Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

Head and Neck cancer

Effect of National Oral Health Screening Program on the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Korean National Population-Based Study: Chan Woo Wee, Hyo-Jung Lee, Jae-Ryun Lee, Hyejin Lee, Min-Jeong Kwoen, Woo-Jin Jeong, Keun-Yong Eom; Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):709-718. Published online October 22, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.834

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
Poor oral health is associated with head and neck cancer (HNC). We evaluated whether a national oral health screening program (OHSP) could reduce the risk of HNC.
Materials and Methods
Data from 408,247 healthy individuals aged ≥ 40 years from the National Health Insurance System-National Health Screening program during 2003 and 2004 in Korea were analyzed. The risk of HNC was compared between subjects who underwent OHSP (HEALS-Dental+, n=165,292) and routine health check-ups only (HEALS-Dental‒, n=242,955). The impact of individual oral health-related factors on HNC risk was evaluated in HEALS-Dental+.
Results
A total of 1,650 HNC cases were diagnosed. The 10-year HNC-free rate was 99.684% with a median follow-up of 11 years. The risk of all HNC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.29; p=0.011) and oropharyngeal cancer (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.94; p=0.005) was significantly higher in HEALS-Dental‒ than in HEALS-Dental+. In HEALS-Dental+, oral cavity cancer was marginally reduced (p=0.085), and missing teeth was a significant factor for HNC (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.50; p=0.032). Toothbrushing was a significant factor in univariate analysis (p=0.028), but not in multivariate analysis (p=0.877).
Conclusion
The National OHSP significantly reduced the long-term HNC risk, particularly the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer. Routine OHSP should be considered at the population level.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Gold Nanoparticles Enhance the Tumor Growth-Suppressing Effects of Cetuximab and Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo
Takumi Sato, Yasumasa Kakei, Takumi Hasegawa, Masahiko Kashin, Shun Teraoka, Akinobu Yamaguchi, Ryohei Sasaki, Masaya Akashi
Cancers.2023; 15(23): 5697. CrossRef

6,287 View
138 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Radiotherapy versus Surgery in Early-Stage HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer: Dong-Yun Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Jin Ho Kim, Joo Ho Lee, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Keun-Yong Eom, Young Ho Jung, Woo-Jin Jeong, Tack-Kyun Kwon, Suzy Kim, Chan Woo Wee; Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):406-416. Published online June 23, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.441

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of primary radiotherapy (RT) versus surgery in early-stage human papilloma virus–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (hpv+OPC), and investigate the preoperative clinical factors that can predict the requirement for postoperative adjuvant treatment.
Materials and Methods
This multicenter study included 166 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition-Stages I-II hpv+OPC. Sixty (36.1%) and 106 (63.9%) patients underwent primary (concurrent chemo)radiotherapy [(CC)RT] and surgery, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (73.6%) in the surgery group received postoperative (CC)RT.
Results
With a median follow-up of 45.6 months for survivors, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LC) for RT/surgery were 97.8%/96.4%, 91.1%/92.0%, and 92.9%/93.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, patients with synchronous radiologic extranodal extension and conglomeration (ENEcong) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) showed significantly poorer OS (p=0.047), PFS (p=0.001), and LC (p=0.003). In patients undergoing primary surgery, two or more clinically positive LN metastases (odds ratio [OR], 5.15; p=0.004) and LN metastases with ENEcong (OR, 3.75; p=0.009) were predictors of postoperative chemoradiotherapy. No patient in the primary RT group demonstrated late severe toxicity whereas three (2.8%), one (0.9%), and one (0.9%) patient in the surgery group showed grade 3 dysphagia, grade 3 xerostomia, and fatal oral cavity bleeding.
Conclusion
We found no differences in OS, PFS, and LC between upfront RT and surgery in stage I-II hpv+OPC which warrants comparison through a prospective trial in the treatment de-escalation era. However, most early-stage hpv+OPC patients undergoing surgery received adjuvant (CC)RT. Pretreatment LN findings were prognostic and predictive for adjuvant treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Definitive radio(chemo)therapy versus upfront surgery in the treatment of HPV-related localized or locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Jérémy Baude, Caroline Guigou, David Thibouw, Noémie Vulquin, Mireille Folia, Guillaume Constantin, Jihane Boustani, Christian Duvillard, Sylvain Ladoire, Gilles Truc, Aurélie Bertaut, Cédric Chevalier, Scott M. Langevin
PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0307658. CrossRef
INFLUENCE OF CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY IN COMBINATION WITH RADIOMODIFIERS ON THE CONTENT OF VEGF, COX-2, AND PGE-2 IN BLOOD SERUM OF PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
N. MITRYAYEVA, L. GREBINYK, S. ARTIUKH, N. BILOZOR, V. STARENKIY
Experimental Oncology.2024; 46(3): 253. CrossRef
Assessment of Radiologic Extranodal Extension Using Combinatorial Analysis of Nodal Margin Breakdown and Metastatic Burden in Oropharyngeal Cancer
Sungryeal Kim, Hannah Park, Se Hyun Yeou, Jin Roh, Yoo Seob Shin, Chul-Ho Kim, Eun Ju Ha, Jeon Yeob Jang
Cancers.2023; 15(13): 3276. CrossRef
Expanding the role of combined immunochemotherapy and immunoradiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancer (Review)
Chun Wei, Xiaojun Lan, Maona Qiu, Ran Cui, Qiuxia Fu, Shafiu Umar Shinge, Tobias Muluh, Ou Jiang
Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

7,584 View
218 Download
3 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Head and Neck Cancer

Recent Treatment Patterns of Oropharyngeal Cancer in Korea Based on the Expert Questionnaire Survey of the Korean Society for Head and Neck Oncology (KSHNO): Kyu Hye Choi, Jin Ho Song, Yeon-Sil Kim, Ji-hoon Kim, Woo-Jin Jeong, Inn-Chul Nam, Jin Ho Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Sang Hoon Chun, Hyun Jun Hong, Young-Hoon Joo, Young-Gyu Eun, Sung Ho Moon, Jeongshim Lee; Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(4):1004-1014. Published online January 29, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.973

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has increased, and staging and optimal therapeutic approaches are challenging. A questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the controversial treatment policy of stage T2 OPC according to the N category and determine the opinions of multidisciplinary experts in Korea.
Materials and Methods
Five OPC scenarios were developed by the Subcommittee on Oropharyngeal Treatment Guidelines of the Korean Society for Head and Neck Oncology and distributed to experts of multidisciplinary treatment hospitals.
Results
Sixty-five experts from 45 institutions responded. For the HPV-positive T2N0M0 scenario, 67.7% of respondents selected surgery followed by definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or radiotherapy alone. For the T2N1M0 HPV-positive scenario, there was a notable difference in the selection of primary treatment by expert specialty; 53.9% of respondents selected surgery and 39.8% selected definitive CCRT as the primary treatment. For the T2N3M0 advanced HPV-positive scenario, 50.0% of respondents selected CCRT and 33.3% considered induction chemotherapy (IC) as the primary treatment. CCRT and IC were significantly more frequently selected for the HPV-related OPC cases (p=0.010). The interdepartmental variability showed that the head and neck surgeons and medical oncologists favored surgery, whereas the radiation oncologists preferably selected definitive CCRT (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In this study, surgery was preferred for lymph node-negative OPC, and as lymph node metastasis progressed, CCRT tended to be preferred, and IC was administered. Clinical practice patterns by stage and HPV status showed differences according to expert specialty. Multidisciplinary consensus guidelines will be essential in the future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Controversies in Lung Cancer: Heterogeneity in Treatment Recommendations for Stage III NSCLC According to Disease Burden and Oncogenic Driver Alterations
Jeremy P Harris, Dylann K Fujimoto, Misako Nagasaka, Eric Ku, Garrett Harada, Hari Keshava, Ali Mahtabifard, Javier Longoria, Niral Patel, Steven Seyedin, Aaron Simon, Allen Chen
Clinical Lung Cancer.2022; 23(4): 333. CrossRef
Survey of radiation field and dose in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer: is de-escalation actually applied in clinical practice?
Kyu Hye Choi, Jin Ho Song, Yeon-Sil Kim, Sung Ho Moon, Jeongshim Lee, Young-Taek Oh, Dongryul Oh, Jin Ho Kim, Jun Won Kim
Radiation Oncology Journal.2021; 39(3): 174. CrossRef

6,237 View
156 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search