Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
6 "Sang-Jae Park"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Gastrointestinal cancer
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Kum Hei Ryu, Sunhwa Park, Jung Won Chun, Eunhae Cho, Jongmun Choi, Dong-Eun Lee, Hyoeun Shim, Yun-Hee Kim, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Sang Myung Woo, Sun-Young Kong
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1303-1312.   Published online April 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.291
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The genetic attribution for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reported as 5%-10%. However, the incidence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in Korean PDAC patients has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we studied to identify the risk factors and prevalence of PV for future treatment strategies in PDAC.
Materials and Methods
Total of 300 (155 male) patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 33 to 90 years) were enrolled in National Cancer Center in Korea. Cancer predisposition genes, clinicopathologic characteristics, and family history of cancer were analyzed.
Results
PVs were detected in 20 patients (6.7%, median age 65) in ATM (n=7, 31.8%), BRCA1 (n=3, 13.6%), BRCA2 (n=3), and RAD51D (n=3). Each one patient showed TP53, PALB2, PMS2, RAD50, MSH3, and SPINK1 PV. Among them, two likely PVs were in ATM and RAD51D, respectively. Family history of various types of cancer including pancreatic cancer (n=4) were found in 12 patients. Three patients with ATM PVs and a patient with three germline PVs (BRCA2, MSH3, and RAD51D) had first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer. Familial pancreatic cancer history and PVs detection had a significant association (4/20, 20% vs. 16/264, 5.7%; p=0.035).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that germline PVs in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51D are most frequent in Korean PDAC patients and it is comparable to those of different ethnic groups. Although this study did not show guidelines for germline predisposition gene testing in patients with PDAC in Korea, it would be emphasized the need for germline testing for all PDAC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • FOXM1 promotes malignant biological behavior and metabolic reprogramming by targeting SPINK1 in hepatocellular carcinoma and affecting the p53 pathway
    Xu Ding, Jinjun Shi, Zhengqing Lei, Guoqing Wang, Chenchun Fu, Xiangyu Su, Guangyu Zhu
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease.2025; 1871(3): 167673.     CrossRef
  • MLH1 Inhibits Metastatic Potential of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma via Downregulation of GPRC5C
    Wen-Jing Liu, Jun Lu, Wei-Xun Zhou, Jian-Zhou Liu, Li Zhou
    Laboratory Investigation.2024; 104(9): 102107.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of PALB2 Pathogenic Germline Variant
    Min-Chae Kang, R.N., Jong Eun Park, Mi-Ae Jang, Dongju Won, Boyoung Park, Seeyoun Lee, Dong Ock Lee, Kum Hei Ryu, Yoon-Jung Chang, Sun-Young Kong
    Laboratory Medicine Online.2024; 14(4): 311.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence Estimation of the PALB2 Germline Variant in East Asians and Koreans through Population Database Analysis
    Jong Eun Park, Min-Chae Kang, Taeheon Lee, Eun Hye Cho, Mi-Ae Jang, Dongju Won, Boyoung Park, Chang-Seok Ki, Sun-Young Kong
    Cancers.2024; 16(19): 3318.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the Genetic Landscape of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Support Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review
    Antonino Pantaleo, Giovanna Forte, Candida Fasano, Martina Lepore Signorile, Paola Sanese, Katia De Marco, Elisabetta Di Nicola, Marialaura Latrofa, Valentina Grossi, Vittoria Disciglio, Cristiano Simone
    Cancers.2023; 16(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • 4,033 View
  • 251 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Prevalence of Psychological Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy and Results of a Distress Management System: A Clinic-Based Study
Mee Joo Kang, Eun-Seung Yu, Young Hwa Kang, Hyeong Min Park, Sang-Jae Park, Sun-Whe Kim, Jong-Heun Kim, Sung-Sik Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(4):1138-1147.   Published online January 4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.842
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy are a high-risk group that requires psychosocial support. This study retrospectively reviewed the prevalence of psychological symptoms in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasm and the psychosocial referral rate after implementing full screening and triage algorithm for administering a distress management protocol based on the integrated supportive care system established in 2010.
Materials and Methods
From September 2010 to December 2018, insomnia, anxiety, and depression were screened on the first day of admission (T1) and on the 10th postoperative day (T2). Patients with clinical levels of distress were referred to a mental health clinic for appropriate aftercare.
Results
The adherence rate to routine screening was 82.7% (364/440). Among the 364 patients, the prevalence of insomnia, anxiety, and depression increased from 22.0% (T1) to 32.6% (T2, p=0.001), 29.1% to 33.6% (p=0.256), and 18.4% to 27.6% (p=0.001), respectively. Less than 45% of those with psychological symptoms expressed their needs for psychological supportive care. Among those with psychological symptoms at T2, clinical insomnia, anxiety, and depression were detected via in-depth evaluations among 77.2%, 38.1%, and 82.5% of patients, respectively. Patients who had two or more symptoms at T2 had a longer postoperative hospital stay, as compared to those with one or no symptoms (a median of 20.5 days vs. 18.0 days, p=0.006). Psychiatric consultation rate was 72.8% among patients with clinical psychological symptoms, and 74% of the consulted patients completed psychiatric intervention before discharge.
Conclusion
Over one-third of the patients had psychological symptoms before and after pancreatoduodenectomy. Implementing a routine psychological symptoms screening with a systematic psychiatric referral protocol enhanced surgeons’ responsiveness to patients’ psychological symptoms.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Assessing the long-term priorities of pancreaticoduodenectomy survivors
    Edward A. Joseph, Kara D. Bowers, Rebecca Marcus, Bibek Aryal, Suzanne C. Schiffman, Patrick L. Wagner, Sricharan Chalikonda, David L. Bartlett, Casey J. Allen
    HPB.2024; 26(5): 703.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postoperative application of esketamine on postoperative depression and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol
    Kaili Yu, Zhenguo Song, Bowen Zhang, Qian Pan, Shan Gan, Shaoyong Yang, Quanyong Yang, Xinhua Zuo, Yiqing Yin
    Trials.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5,030 View
  • 100 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
First Course of treatment and Prognosis of Exocrine Pancreatic Cancer in Korea from 2006 to 2017
Mee Joo Kang, Jiwon Lim, Sung-Sik Han, Hyeong Min Park, Sang-Jae Park, Young-Joo Won, Sun-Whe Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):208-217.   Published online May 21, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.421
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Hospital-based clinical studies have limitations in holistic assessment of cancer treatment and prognosis, as they omit out-of-hospital patients including elderly individuals. This study aimed to investigate trends in initial treatment and corresponding prognosis of patients with exocrine pancreatic cancer (EPC) in Korea.
Materials and Methods
The Korea Central Cancer Registry data of patients with EPC from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. We defined the first course of treatment (FT) as the cancer-directed treatment administered within four months after cancer diagnosis according to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.
Results
Among 62,209 patients with EPC, localized and regional (LR) SEER stage; patients over 70 years old; and ductal adenocarcinoma excluding cystic or mucinous (DAC) accounted for 40.6%, 50.1%, and 95.9%, respectively. “No active treatment” (NT, 46.5%) was the most frequent, followed by non-surgical FT (28.7%) and surgical FT (22.0%). Among 25,198 patients with LR EPC, surgical FT increased (35.9% to 46.3%) and NT decreased (45.0% to 29.5%) from 2006 to 2017. The rate of surgical FT was inversely related to age (55.1% [< 70 years], 37.3% [70-79 years], 10.9% [≥ 80 years]). Five-year relative survival rates of LR DAC were higher after surgical FT than after NT in localized (46.1% vs. 12.9%) and regional stage (23.6% vs. 4.9%) from 2012 to 2017.
Conclusion
Less than half of overall patients with LR EPC underwent surgical FT, and this proportion decreased significantly in elderly individuals. Clinicians should focus attention on elderly patients with EPC to provide appropriate medical advice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Conditional Relative Survival of Exocrine Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study
    Mee Joo Kang, Johyun Ha, Hyeong Min Park, Sang-Jae Park, Kyu-Won Jung, Sung-Sik Han
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(2): 1178.     CrossRef
  • Potential role of Fibrosis‐4 score in hepatocellular carcinoma screening: The Kangbuk Samsung Health Study
    Sujeong Shin, Won Sohn, Yoosoo Chang, Yoosun Cho, Min‐Jung Kwon, Sarah H. Wild, Christopher D. Byrne, Seungho Ryu
    Hepatology Research.2024; 54(6): 551.     CrossRef
  • Three-year follow-up study reveals improved survival rate in NSCLC patients underwent guideline-concordant diagnosis and treatment
    Huijuan Mu, Xing Yang, Yanxia Li, Bingzheng Zhou, Li Liu, Minmin Zhang, Qihao Wang, Qian Chen, Lingjun Yan, Wei Sun, Guowei Pan
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Epidemiological trends and factors associated with survival in patients with medulloblastoma: A 45-year population-based retrospective study
    Dongjie He, Yahui Yang, Peiwen Wu, Siying Zhu, Hao Chang, Chao Zhang, Qiuju Shao, Zongyan Yu
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2024; 126: 154.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer
    Sun-Whe Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(2): 63.     CrossRef
  • Exocrine pancreatic cancer as a second primary malignancy: A population-based study
    Mee Joo Kang, Jiwon Lim, Sung-Sik Han, Hyeong Min Park, Sung Chun Cho, Sang-Jae Park, Sun-Whe Kim, Young-Joo Won
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2023; 27(4): 415.     CrossRef
  • Distinct prognosis of biliary tract cancer according to tumor location, stage, and treatment: a population-based study
    Mee Joo Kang, Jiwon Lim, Sung-Sik Han, Hyeong Min Park, Sun-Whe Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Tae Hyun Kim, Young-Joo Won, Sang-Jae Park
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trend Analysis and Prediction of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea
    Hyeong Min Park, Young-Joo Won, Mee Joo Kang, Sang-Jae Park, Sun-Whe Kim, Kyu-Won Jung, Sung-Sik Han
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer in Korea: Trends in Incidence and Survival Based on Korea Central Cancer Registry Data (1999–2019)
    Sin Hye Park, Mee Joo Kang, E Hwa Yun, Kyu-Won Jung
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2022; 22(3): 160.     CrossRef
  • Incidence, mortality and survival of gallbladder, extrahepatic bile duct, and pancreatic cancer using Korea central cancer registry database: 1999-2019
    Mee Joo Kang, E Hwa Yun, Kyu-Won Jung, Sang-Jae Park
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2022; 26(3): 220.     CrossRef
  • Incidence, mortality, and survival of liver cancer using Korea central cancer registry database: 1999-2019
    Sung Yeon Hong, Mee Joo Kang, Taegyu Kim, Kyu-Won Jung, Bong-Wan Kim
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2022; 26(3): 211.     CrossRef
  • 6,120 View
  • 116 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Validation of the 8th AJCC Cancer Staging System for Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Korean Nationwide Surgery Database
Yunghun You, Jin-Young Jang, Song Cheol Kim, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Chol Kyoon Cho, Sang-Jae Park, Jae Do Yang, Woo Jung Lee, Tae Ho Hong, Keun Soo Ahn, Chi-Young Jeong, Hyeon Kook Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Young Hoon Roh, Hee Joon Kim, Hongbeom Kim, In Woong Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1639-1652.   Published online April 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.023
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) included several significant changes. We aim to evaluate this staging system compared to the 7th edition AJCC staging system and European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) system.
Materials and Methods
We used Korean nationwide surgery database (2000-2014). Of 972 patients who had undergone surgery for PNET, excluding patients diagnosed with ENETS/World Health Organization 2010 grade 3 (G3), only 472 patients with accurate stage were included.
Results
Poor discrimination in overall survival rate (OSR) was noted between AJCC 8th stage III and IV (p=0.180). The disease-free survival (DFS) curves of 8th AJCC classification were well separated between all stages. Compared with stage I, the hazard ratio of II, III, and IV was 3.808, 13.928, and 30.618, respectively (p=0.007, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The curves of OSR and DFS of certain prognostic group in AJCC 7th and ENETS overlapped. In ENETS staging system, no significant difference in DFS between stage IIB versus IIIA (p=0.909) and IIIA versus IIIB (p=0.291). In multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002), perineural invasion (p=0.003), and grade (p < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for DFS.
Conclusion
This is the first large-scale validation of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for PNET. The revised 8th system provides better discrimination compared to that of the 7th edition and ENETS TNM system. This supports the clinical use of the system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imaging Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Eric Rupe, Mahmoud Diab, LeeAnn Xoubi, Noha Kabeel, Ajaykumar Morani, Albert Klekers, Priya Bhosale
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2025; 60(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of CT-based radiomics in grade 1–2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Subin Heo, Hyo Jung Park, Hyoung Jung Kim, Jung Hoon Kim, Seo Young Park, Kyung Won Kim, So Yeon Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, Jae Ho Byun, Song Cheol Kim, Hee Sang Hwang, Seung Mo Hong
    Cancer Imaging.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Contemporary Approaches to the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Akash Kartik, Valerie L. Armstrong, Chee-Chee Stucky, Nabil Wasif, Zhi Ven Fong
    Cancers.2024; 16(8): 1501.     CrossRef
  • Optimal surgical management of unifocal vs. multifocal NF-PNETs: a respective cohort study
    Juwan Kim, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyong Hwang, Chang Moo Kang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NON-FUNCTIONING SPORADIC PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR IS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR RECURRENCE AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT
    Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, André Luis Montagnini, Jessica Okubo, Ana Gabriela Vivarelli Fernandes, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Paulo Herman, José Jukemura
    ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Venous invasion and lymphatic invasion are correlated with the postoperative prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm
    Sho Kiritani, Junichi Arita, Yuichiro Mihara, Rihito Nagata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Takeaki Ishizawa, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Junichi Kaneko, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
    Surgery.2023; 173(2): 365.     CrossRef
  • Impact of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on Staging and Therapeutic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors
    Aleksander Kosmala, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Thomas Lindner, Kerstin Michalski, Andreas Schirbel, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Weich, Rudolf A. Werner
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence and outcomes of non‐functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours post‐resection: an Australian retrospective, multicentre cohort study
    Sean Lim, Lynn Chong, Saania Peeroo, Olukunle Onasanya, Evelyn He, Simon Banting, Daniel Croagh
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(1-2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Validation of a supplementary condition of eighth AJCC staging system for stage II hepatocellular carcinoma
    Min Li, Linquan Wu, Shuaiwu Luo, Yaran Liu, Chi Sun, Enliang Li, Jiakun Wang, Bowen Li, Zhihao Huang, Jin Ge, Jun Lei, Fan Zhou, Wenjun Liao
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(7): 1217.     CrossRef
  • A population-based nomogram to individualize treatment modality for pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery
    Xiao-Ya Shi, Yan Wang, Xuan Zhou, Meng-Li Xie, Qian Ma, Gan-Xin Wang, Jing Zhan, Yi-Ming Shao, Bai Wei
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of CXCR4-Directed PET/CT on Staging and Proposed Oncologic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors
    Alexander Weich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas Schirbel, Marieke Heinrich, Andreas K. Buck, Steven P. Rowe, Aleksander Kosmala, Rudolf A. Werner
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(7): 586.     CrossRef
  • Lifestyle, clinical and histological indices-based prediction models for survival in cancer patients: a city-wide prospective cohort study in China
    Ce Sun, Huan Xu, Suixiang Wang, Ke Li, Pengzhe Qin, Boheng Liang, Lin Xu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(12): 9965.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Approach Using [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
    Yong-Jin Park, Young Suk Park, Seung Tae Kim, Seung Hyup Hyun
    Molecular Imaging and Biology.2023; 25(5): 897.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic validity of the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition staging system for well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Hebin Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hang Zhang, Jun Liu, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Feng Peng, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu, Jikuan Jin, Yi Wu, Abu
    HPB.2022; 24(5): 681.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using data from the KOTUS-BP national database: overcoming selection bias and the necessity of definite indications
    Hongbeom Kim, Jin Seok Heo, Chang Moo Kang, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Sung-Sik Han, Yong Hoon Kim, Hyeon Kook Lee, Young-Dong Yu, In Seok Choi, Jae Do Yang, Younghoon Roh, Seong-Ryong Kim, Junchul Chung, Sang Hwa Song,
    HPB.2022; 24(10): 1804.     CrossRef
  • Fate of Surgical Patients with Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An International Study Using Multi-Institutional Registries
    In Woong Han, Jangho Park, Eun Young Park, So Jeong Yoon, Gang Jin, Dae Wook Hwang, Kuirong Jiang, Wooil Kwon, Xuefeng Xu, Jin Seok Heo, De-Liang Fu, Woo Jung Lee, Xueli Bai, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Yin-Mo Yang, Keun Soo Ahn, Chunhui Yuan, Hyeon Kook Lee, Bei Sun,
    Cancers.2022; 14(4): 1038.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Modified Eighth AJCC Staging System for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Xu-Feng Zhang, Feng Xue, Zheng Wu, Alexandra G. Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Eleftherios Makris, Flavio Rocha, Zaheer Kanji, Sharon Weber, Alexander Fisher, Ryan Fields, Bradley A. Krasnick, Kamran Idrees, Paula M. Smith, Cliff Cho, Megan Beems, Yi Ly
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 275(6): e773.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center
    Sara Coelho, Cláudia Costa, Ana Paula Santos, Pedro Souteiro, Joana Oliveira, Júlio Oliveira, Isabel Azevedo, Isabel Torres, Maria José Bento
    Endocrine Oncology.2022; 2(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes, Long-Term Survivals and Staging Systems of World Health Organization G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Min Yang, Lin Zeng, Shengzhong Hou, Bole Tian, Shuguang Jin, Yi Zhang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(18): 5253.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Periampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Database Analysis
    Jinghua Chen, Qichen Chen, Yiqiao Deng, Yujuan Jiang, Zhen Huang, Jianguo Zhou, Hong Zhao, Jianqiang Cai
    Current Oncology.2022; 30(1): 344.     CrossRef
  • Clinical value of 68Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET/CT in the diagnosis and detection of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huan Ma, Ying Kan, Ji-gang Yang
    Acta Radiologica.2021; 62(9): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Strategy Based on Radiological 3D Reconstruction in a Giant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Pancreas: A Case Report of an Interdisciplinary Approach
    Gabriel Fridolin Hess, Savas Deniz Soysal, Guillaume Nicolas, Martin Bolli, Christoph Johannes Zech, Alexandar Tzankov, Emanuel Christ, Michael Montemurro, Otto Kollmar, Tahsin Colak
    Case Reports in Surgery.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of extracellular volume fraction with equilibrium contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Hiromichi Iwaya, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Shinichi Hashimoto, Shiroh Tanoue, Machiko Kawahira, Makoto Hinokuchi, Toshihiro Fujita, Yuga Komaki, Shiho Arima, Fumisato Sasaki, Shuji Kanmura, Michiyo Higashi, Kiichi Tamada, Akio Ido
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(4): 779.     CrossRef
  • The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update
    Xiaoyan Liao, Dongwei Zhang
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2021; 145(5): 543.     CrossRef
  • Insights of Outcome after Resection of Small Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors
    Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, Julia Fray Ribeiro, Thiago Costa Ribeiro, Ricardo Jureidini, Guilherme Naccache Namur, Thiago Nogueira Costa, Telesforo Bacchella, Ivan Cecconello, Jose Celso Ardengh
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • New staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms combining TNM stage and WHO grade classification [ ]
    Min Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hebin Wang, Yahui Liu, Jianhua Liu, Jun Liu, Hang Zhang, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu,
    Cancer Letters.2021; 518: 207.     CrossRef
  • Ampullary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insight into a Rare Histology
    Samantha M. Ruff, Oliver Standring, Grace Wu, Anna Levy, Sandeep Anantha, Elliot Newman, Martin S. Karpeh, William Nealon, Gary B. Deutsch, Matthew J. Weiss, Danielle K. DePeralta
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(13): 8318.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management
    Zu-Yi Ma, Yuan-Feng Gong, Hong-Kai Zhuang, Zi-Xuan Zhou, Shan-Zhou Huang, Yi-Ping Zou, Bo-Wen Huang, Zhong-Hai Sun, Chuan-Zhao Zhang, Yun-Qiang Tang, Bao-Hua Hou
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(19): 2305.     CrossRef
  • Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Hong-Yu Chen, Ya-Liang Zhou, Yong-Hua Chen, Xing Wang, Hao Zhang, Neng-Wen Ke, Xu-Bao Liu, Chun-Lu Tan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(25): 3638.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification
    Lokesh Khanna, Srinivasa R. Prasad, Abhijit Sunnapwar, Sainath Kondapaneni, Anil Dasyam, Varaha S. Tammisetti, Umber Salman, Alia Nazarullah, Venkata S. Katabathina
    RadioGraphics.2020; 40(5): 1240.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Ashley L. Titan, Jeffrey A. Norton, Andrea T. Fisher, Deshka S. Foster, E. John Harris, David J. Worhunsky, Patrick J. Worth, Monica M. Dua, Brendan C. Visser, George A. Poultsides, Michael T. Longaker, Robert T. Jensen
    JAMA Network Open.2020; 3(11): e2024318.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies
    Lingaku Lee, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T Jensen
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(12): 1029.     CrossRef
  • 10,362 View
  • 253 Download
  • 33 Web of Science
  • 32 Crossref
Close layer
Proximal Resection Margins: More Prognostic than Distal Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Resection
Tae Yoo, Sang-Jae Park, Sung-Sik Han, Seong Hoon Kim, Seung Duk Lee, Tae Hyun Kim, Soon-ae Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Woo Jin Lee, Eun Kyung Hong
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1106-1113.   Published online November 16, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.320
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Even though the therapeutic gold standard of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) resection is cancer-free resection margin (RM), surgical treatment still remains challenging. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of RM status in resected HCCA patients and identified survival prognostic factors.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed records of 96 HCCA patients who underwent surgery from 2001 to 2012 and analyzed the RM status and prognostic factors that affecting survival.
Results
Negative RM (n=31, 33%) was significantly associated with better survival vs. positive RM (n=65, 67%) (mean survival time [MST], 33 months vs. 21 months; p=0.011). Margins with histological findings of non-dysplastic epithelium, low-grade dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ were not associated with survival differences (MST, 33 months vs. 33 months vs. 30 months; p=0.452), whereas positive margins were associated with poorer survival relative to carcinoma in situ (MST, 30 months vs. 21 months; p=0.050). Among patients with R0 resection, narrow (≤ 5 mm) and wide (> 5 mm) margins were not associated with survival differences (MST, 33 months vs. 30 months; p=0.234). Although positive proximal RM was associated with poorer survival compared to negative RM (MST, 19 vs. 33; p=0.002), no survival difference was observed between positive and negative distal RMs (MST, 30 vs. 33; p=0.628). Proximal RM positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.688; p=0.007) and nodal involvement (HR, 3.293; p < 0.001) were independent survival prognostic factors.
Conclusion
A clear RM, especially proximal RM status, was significant prognosticator, and proximal bile duct resection to the greatest technically feasible extent may be necessary, with careful consideration of the potential morbidity and oncologic outcomes after resection. However, an aggressive approach to obtain a negative distal RM might be controversial and should be considered carefully, depending on the patient's status.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Molecular profiling and prognostic analysis in Chinese cholangiocarcinoma: an observational, retrospective single-center study
    Changkun Zhang, Xia You, Qin Zhang, Dong Wang
    Investigational New Drugs.2024; 42(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Radiographic features predictive of recurrence and survival after surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Julaluck Promsorn, Panjaporn Naknan, Aumkhae Sookprasert, Kosin Wirasorn, Jarin Chindaprasirt, Attapol Titapun, Piyapharom Intarawichian, Mukesh Harisinghani
    Heliyon.2024; 10(7): e28805.     CrossRef
  • Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers
    Hyung Sun Kim, Mee Joo Kang, Jingu Kang, Kyubo Kim, Bohyun Kim, Seong-Hun Kim, Soo Jin Kim, Yong-Il Kim, Joo Young Kim, Jin Sil Kim, Haeryoung Kim, Hyo Jung Kim, Ji Hae Nahm, Won Suk Park, Eunkyu Park, Joo Kyung Park, Jin Myung Park, Byeong Jun Song, Yong
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2024; 28(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Perineural (Pn), Lymphangio (L) and Vascular (V) Invasion on Survival after Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Rabea Margies, Lisa-Katharina Gröger, Beate K. Straub, Fabian Bartsch, Hauke Lang
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3463.     CrossRef
  • Liver transplantation for unresectable Klatskin tumor: experience of two centers, first distant results
    D. A. Granov, V. N. Zhuikov, I. I. Tileubergenov, A. V. Moiseenko, I. O. Rutkin, A. R. Sheraliev, A. A. Polikarpov, O. O. Rummo, A. E. Shcherba, I. P. Shturich, S. V. Korotkov, L. V. Kirkovsky, T. M. Chernishov
    Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery.2024; 29(3): 70.     CrossRef
  • Significance of dysplasia in bile duct resection margin in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis
    Jung Wan Choe, Hyo Jung Kim, Jae Seon Kim
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(10): 3078.     CrossRef
  • Klatskin Tumor: A Survival Analysis According to Tumor Characteristics and Inflammatory Ratios
    Vlad-Ionuţ Nechita, Emil Moiş, Luminiţa Furcea, Mihaela-Ancuţa Nechita, Florin Graur
    Medicina.2022; 58(12): 1788.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Remnant Carcinoma in Situ at the Ductal Stump on Long‐Term Outcomes in Patients with Distal Cholangiocarcinoma
    Koya Yasukawa, Akira Shimizu, Hiroaki Motoyama, Koji Kubota, Tsuyoshi Notake, Kentaro Fukushima, Tomohiko Ikehara, Hikaru Hayashi, Akira Kobayashi, Yuji Soejima
    World Journal of Surgery.2021; 45(1): 291.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive analysis of genomic alterations of Chinese hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients
    Feiling Feng, Xiaobing Wu, Xiaoliang Shi, Qingxiang Gao, Yue Wu, Yong Yu, Qingbao Cheng, Bin Li, Bin Yi, Chen Liu, Qing Hao, Lin Zhang, Chunfang Gao, Xiaoqing Jiang
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 26(4): 717.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of Perioperative CA19-9 Levels in Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Jong Woo Lee, Jae Hoon Lee, Yejong Park, Jaewoo Kwon, Woohyung Lee, Ki Byung Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(7): 1345.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System
    Jong Woo Lee, Jae Hoon Lee, Yejong Park, Woohyung Lee, Jaewoo Kwon, Ki Byung Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 886.     CrossRef
  • Comparative study of laparoscopic‐assisted and open total gastrectomy for Siewert Types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
    Jianchu Wang, Jin‐Cheng Wang, Bin Song, Xu‐Dong Dai, Xiao‐Yu Zhang
    Journal of Cellular Physiology.2019; 234(7): 11235.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of carcinoma in situ at ductal resection margins in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Toshifumi Wakai, Jun Sakata, Tomohiro Katada, Yuki Hirose, Daiki Soma, Pankaj Prasoon, Kohei Miura, Takashi Kobayashi
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2018; 2(5): 359.     CrossRef
  • 8,788 View
  • 244 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Close layer
Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Followed by Simultaneous Integrated Boost–Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results from a Feasibility Study
Sang Myung Woo, Min Kyeong Kim, Jungnam Joo, Kyong-Ah Yoon, Boram Park, Sang-Jae Park, Sung-Sik Han, Ju Hee Lee, Eun Kyung Hong, Yun-Hee Kim, Hae Moon, Sun-Young Kong, Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):1022-1032.   Published online January 19, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.495
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study assessed the feasibility and compliance of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by simultaneous integrated boost–intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Materials and Methods
In this trial, patients received induction chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each treatment cycle. Patients were subsequently treated with gemcitabine (300 mg/m2/wk) during SIB-IMRT. The patients received total doses of 55 and 44 Gy in 22 fractions to planning target volume 1 and 2, respectively. As an ancillary study, digital polymerase chain reaction was performed to screen for the seven most common mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS oncogene of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA).
Results
Forty-four patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2015. Of these, 33 (75%) completed the treatment. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (18.2%), grade 3 nausea (6.8%) and vomiting (6.8%). The most common toxicities during SIB-IMRT were grade 3 neutropenia (24.2%) and grade 3 anemia (12.1%). Ten patients (23%) underwent a curative resection after therapy. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative resection (16.8 months vs. 11 months, p < 0.01). The median cfDNA concentration was significantly lower after treatment (108.5 ng/mL vs. 18.4 ng/mL, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent SIB-IMRT was well tolerated and active.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Krishan R. Jethwa, Ed Kim, Jordan Berlin, Christopher J. Anker, Leila Tchelebi, Gerard Abood, Christopher L. Hallemeier, Salma Jabbour, Timothy Kennedy, Rachit Kumar, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vonetta Williams, Suzanne Russo
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 47(4): 185.     CrossRef
  • Kinetics of plasma cell-free DNA as a prospective biomarker to predict the prognosis and radiotherapy effect of esophageal cancer
    Y. Li, J. Wu, Y. Feng, D. Wang, H. Tao, J. Wen, F. Jiang, P. Qian, Y. Liu
    Cancer/Radiothérapie.2024; 28(3): 242.     CrossRef
  • Circulating tumor DNA: a help to guide therapeutic strategy in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma?
    Olivier Caliez, Daniel Pietrasz, Feryel Ksontini, Solène Doat, Jean-Marc Simon, Jean-Christophe Vaillant, Valerie Taly, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Jean-Baptiste Bachet
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2022; 54(10): 1428.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Tumor DNA Detection by Digital-Droplet PCR in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Marisol Huerta, Susana Roselló, Luis Sabater, Ana Ferrer, Noelia Tarazona, Desamparados Roda, Valentina Gambardella, Clara Alfaro-Cervelló, Marina Garcés-Albir, Andrés Cervantes, Maider Ibarrola-Villava
    Cancers.2021; 13(5): 994.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy-Based Actionable Mutations Detected via ddPCR
    Irina Palacín-Aliana, Noemí García-Romero, Adrià Asensi-Puig, Josefa Carrión-Navarro, Víctor González-Rumayor, Ángel Ayuso-Sacido
    Biomedicines.2021; 9(8): 906.     CrossRef
  • A review on the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seed implantation in unresectable pancreatic cancers
    Sheng-Nan Jia, Fu-Xing Wen, Ting-Ting Gong, Xin Li, Hui-Jie Wang, Ya-Min Sun, Ze-Cheng Yang
    International Journal of Radiation Biology.2020; 96(3): 383.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost technique for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Eun Sang Oh, Sang Hee Youn, Hye Young Jang, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Cancer Panel Sequencing Defines Genetic Diversity and Changes in the Mutational Characteristics of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment
    Kyong-Ah Yoon, Sang Myung Woo, Yun-Hee Kim, Sun-Young Kong, Min Kyoung Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang-Jae Park
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(6): 683.     CrossRef
  • Plasma Cell-Free DNA as a Predictive Marker after Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Sangjoon Park, Eun Jung Lee, Chai Hong Rim, Jinsil Seong
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2018; 59(4): 470.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Pancreatic Cancer
    Tae Hyun Kim, Woo Jin Lee, Sang Myung Woo, Hyunjung Kim, Eun Sang Oh, Ju Hee Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Sang-Jae Park, Yang-Gun Suh, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 10,132 View
  • 254 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP