Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Sang-Jae Lee"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
A Phase II Study of Leucovorin, 5-FU and Docetaxel Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Inoperable or Postoperative Relapsed Gastric Cancer
Kwang-Sun Lee, Ha-Yeon Lee, Eun-Kyung Park, Joung-Soon Jang, Sang-Jae Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40(1):11-15.   Published online March 31, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2008.40.1.11
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

To estimate the effect and toxicity of bimonthly low-dose leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus plus continuous infusion(LV5FU2) with docetaxel combination chemotheraphy in patients with inoperable or postoperative relapsed gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

Total 27 patients are enrolled in this study. LV 20 mg/m2 (bolus), 5FU 400 mg/m2 (bolus), 5-FU 600 mg/m2 (24-hour continuous infusion) on day 1, 2, 15, and 16, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion) on day 15 every 4 weeks.

Results

Total of 141 cycles were administered and response rate were 36.8% with 2 complete response (10.5%) and 5 partial response (26.3%) in 19 evaluable patients. The median response duration is 8.1 months (95% CI, 4.0~12.1). The median progression-free survival time is 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.0~8.5) and the median overall survival time is 11.9 months (95% CI, 4.8~19.1). The grade 3-4 toxcity of neutropenia (24.8%) and anemia (11.3%), neutropenic fever (2.8%) is observed. The grade 1 toxcity of injection site reaction is observed all patients and the grade 1-2 toxcity of alopecia is observed 60%.

Conclusions

LV5FU2 with docetaxel combination chemotheraphy is effective and tolerable in patients with inoperable or postoperative relapsed gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial
    Jian-Xian Lin, Yi-Hui Tang, Hua-Long Zheng, Kai Ye, Jian-Chun Cai, Li-Sheng Cai, Wei Lin, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jun Lu, Qi-Yue Chen, Long-Long Cao, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Chang-Ming Huang
    Nature Communications.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts
    P C Thuss-Patience, A Kretzschmar, Y Dogan, F Rothmann, I Blau, I Schwaner, K Breithaupt, D Bichev, M Grothoff, C Grieser, P Reichardt
    British Journal of Cancer.2011; 105(4): 505.     CrossRef
  • 10,018 View
  • 60 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Randomized, Multi-center Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Etoposide Plus Cisplatin as the First-line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Nam-Su Lee, Hee-Sook Park, Jong-Ho Won, Dae-Sik Hong, Su-Taek Uh, Sang-Jae Lee, Joo-Hang Kim, Se-Kyu Kim, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jung-Hye Choi, Suk-Chul Yang, Jung-Ae Lee, Keun-Seok Lee, Chang-Yeol Yim, Yong-Chul Lee, Chul-Soo Kim, Moon-Hee Lee, Kab-Do Jung, Hanlim Moon, Yl-Sub Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(6):332-338.   Published online December 31, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.6.332
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

We prospectively conducted a multi-center, open-label, randomized phase II trial to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) and etoposide plus cisplatin (EC) for treating advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

Seventy-eight previously untreated patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled in this study. The patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 in the DC or EC arm, respectively, every 3 weeks.

Results

The objective response rate was 39.4% (15/38) and 18.4% (7/38) (p=0.023) in the DC and EC arms, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.9 and 2.7 months (p=0.119), and the overall survival was 12.1 and 8.7 months (p=0.168) in the DC and EC arms, respectively. The prognostic factors for longer survival were an earlier disease stage (stage III, p=0.0095), the responders to DC (p=0.0174) and the adenocarcinoma histology (p=0.0454). The grades 3 and 4 toxicities were similar in both arms, with more febrile neutropenia (7.9% vs. 0%) and fatigue (7.9% vs. 0%) being noted in the DC arm.

Conclusion

DC offered a superior overall response rate than does EC, along with tolerable toxicity profiles, although the DC drug combination did not show significantly improved survival and TTP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Correlations between objective response rate and survival-based endpoints in first-line advanced non-small cell lung Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sarah Goring, Nebibe Varol, Nathalie Waser, Evan Popoff, Greta Lozano-Ortega, Adam Lee, Yong Yuan, Laura Eccles, Phuong Tran, John R. Penrod
    Lung Cancer.2022; 170: 122.     CrossRef
  • 10,030 View
  • 67 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP