Eunah Chung, Jae Myoung Noh, Kyu Chan Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Weon Kuu Chung, Yang-Gun Suh, Jung Ae Lee, Ki Ho Seol, Hong Gyun Wu, Yeon Sil Kim, O Kyu Noh, Jae Won Park, Dong Soo Lee, Jihae Lee, Young Suk Kim, Woo-Yoon Park, Min Kyu Kang, Sunmi Jo, Yong Chan Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1001-1010. Published online October 15, 2018
Purpose
Lung Cancer Subcommittee of Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) has recently launched a prospective clinical trial (KROG 17-06) of hippocampus-sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in treating multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. In order to improve trial quality, dummy run studies among the participating institutions were designed. This work reported the results of two-step dummy run procedures of the KROG 17-06 study.
Materials and Methods
Two steps tested hippocampus contouring variability and radiation therapy planning compliance. In the first step, the variation of the hippocampus delineation was investigated for two representative cases using the Dice similarity coefficients. In the second step, the participating institutions were requested to generate a HS-WBRT with SIB treatment plan for another representative case. The compliance of the treatment plans to the planning protocol was evaluated.
Results
In the first step, the median Dice similarity coefficients of the hippocampus contours for two other dummy run cases changed from 0.669 (range, 0.073 to 0.712) to 0.690 (range, 0.522 to 0.750) and from 0.291 (range, 0.219 to 0.522) to 0.412 (range, 0.264 to 0.598) after providing the hippocampus contouring feedback. In the second step, with providing additional plan priority and extended dose constraints to the target volumes and normal structures, we observed the improved compliance of the treatment plans to the planning protocol.
Conclusion
The dummy run studies demonstrated the notable inter-institutional variability in delineating the hippocampus and treatment plan generation, which could be decreased through feedback from the trial center.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Radiotherapy trial quality assurance processes: a systematic review Chloe Brooks, Elizabeth Miles, Peter J Hoskin The Lancet Oncology.2024; 25(3): e104. CrossRef
Durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer Sehhoon Park, Jae Myoung Noh, Yoon-La Choi, Sang Ah Chi, Kyunga Kim, Hyun Ae Jung, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jong-Mu Sun European Journal of Cancer.2022; 169: 42. CrossRef
Region-Specific Effects of Fractionated Low-Dose Versus Single-Dose Radiation on Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Neuroinflammation Zoé Schmal, Claudia E. Rübe Cancers.2022; 14(22): 5477. CrossRef
Non–coplanar whole brain radiotherapy is an effective modality for parotid sparing Jaehyeon Park, Jae Won Park, Ji Woon Yea Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2019; 36(1): 36. CrossRef
Boram Ha, Kwan Ho Cho, Sung Ho Moon, Chang-Geol Lee, Ki Chang Keum, Yeon-Sil Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Jin Ho Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh, Jae Myoung Noh, Jong Hoon Lee, Sung Hwan Kim, Won Taek Kim, Young-Taek Oh, Min Kyu Kang, Jin Hee Kim, Ji-Yoon Kim, Moon-June Cho, Chul Seoung Kay, Jin Hwa Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):12-23. Published online February 5, 2018
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Materials and Methods
Data on 1,073 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 NPC were collected from a multi-institutional retrospective database (KROG 11-06). All patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT) either with three-dimensional-conformal RT (3D-CRT) (n=576) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) (n=497). The patients were divided into two groups treated at high volume institution (HVI) (n=750) and low volume institution (LVI) (n=323), defined as patient volume ≥ 10 (median, 13; range, 10 to 18) and < 10 patients per year (median, 3; range, 2 to 6), respectively. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS).
Results
At a median follow-up of 56.7 months, the outcomes were significantly better in those treated at HVI than at LVI. For the 614 patients of propensity score-matched cohort, 5-year OS and LRPFS were consistently higher in the HVI group than in the LVI group (OS: 78.4% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001; LRPFS: 86.2% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). According to RT modality, significant difference in 5-year OS was observed in patients receiving 3D-CRT (78.7% for HVI vs. 58.9% for LVI, p < 0.001) and not in those receiving IMRT (77.3% for HVI vs. 75.5% for LVI, p=0.170).
Conclusion
A significant relationship was observed between HVI and LVI for the clinical outcomes of patients with NPC. However, the difference in outcome becomes insignificant in the IMRT era, probably due to the standardization of practice by education.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Accumulated Dose Deviation of Rotational and Residual Setup Errors on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using MIM Treated by Helical Tomotherapy Wenyan Yao, Jiang Hu, Peixun Xu, Mengxue He, Yongwen Fang, Mingzhi Liu, Zongtai Li, Huilang He, Hui Liu, Wenzhao Sun, Senkui Xu Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association Between Radiation Therapy Treatment Volume and Patient Outcomes Jerry Ye Aung Kyaw, Alice Rendall, Erin F. Gillespie, Tom Roques, Laurence Court, Yolande Lievens, Alison C. Tree, Chris Frampton, Ajay Aggarwal International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2023; 117(5): 1063. CrossRef
The Influence of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal, Sinonasal, and Skull-Base Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stephanie Flukes, Rahul K. Sharma, Shivangi Lohia, Marc A. Cohen Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.2022; 83(03): 270. CrossRef
A Comprehensive Analysis of Treatment Management and Survival Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Khodayar Goshtasbi, Brandon M. Lehrich, Jack L. Birkenbeuel, Arash Abiri, Jeremy P. Harris, Edward C. Kuan Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.2021; 165(1): 93. CrossRef
Hospital volume and physician volume in association with survival in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer after radiation therapy Tzu-Yu Lai, Chiu-Mei Yeh, Yu-Wen Hu, Chia-Jen Liu Radiotherapy and Oncology.2020; 151: 190. CrossRef
Byung Sup Kim, Ho Jun Seol, Do-Hyun Nam, Chul-Kee Park, Il Han Kim, Tae Min Kim, Jeong Hoon Kim, Young Hyun Cho, Sang Min Yoon, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui Hyun Kim, Chang-Ok Suh, Tae-Young Jung, Kyung-Hwa Lee, Chae-Yong Kim, In Ah Kim, Chang-Ki Hong, Heon Yoo, Jin Hee Kim, Shin-Hyuk Kang, Min Kyu Kang, Eun-Young Kim, Sun-Hwan Kim, Dong-Sup Chung, Sun-Chul Hwang, Joon-Ho Song, Sung Jin Cho, Sun-Il Lee, Youn-Soo Lee, Kook-Jin Ahn, Se Hoon Kim, Do Hun Lim, Ho-Shin Gwak, Se-Hoon Lee, Yong-Kil Hong
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(1):193-203. Published online June 27, 2016
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and survival benefits of combined treatment with radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) in a Korean sample.
Materials and Methods A total of 750 Korean patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma multiforme, who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with TMZ (CCRT) and adjuvant TMZ from January 2006 until June 2011, were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
After the first operation, a gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), partial resection (PR), biopsy alone were achieved in 388 (51.7%), 159 (21.2%), 96 (12.8%), and 107 (14.3%) patients,respectively. The methylation status of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was reviewed retrospectively in 217 patients. The median follow-up period was 16.3 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 17.5 months. The actuarial survival rates at the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 72.1%, 21.0%, and 9.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.1 months, and the actuarial PFS at 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS were 42.2%, 13.0%, and 7.8%, respectively. The patients who received GTR showed a significantly longer OS and PFS than those who received STR, PR, or biopsy alone, regardless of the methylation status of the MGMT promoter. Patients with a methylated MGMT promoter also showed a significantly longer OS and PFS than those with an unmethylated MGMT promoter. Patients who received more than six cycles of adjuvant TMZ had a longer OS and PFS than those who received six or fewer cycles. Hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or 4 was observed in 8.4% of patients during the CCRT period and in 10.2% during the adjuvant TMZ period.
Conclusion Patients treated with CCRT followed by adjuvant TMZ had more favorable survival rates and tolerable toxicity than those who did not undergo this treatment.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacy and safety of carmustine wafers, followed by radiation, temozolomide, and bevacizumab therapy, for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with maximal resection Masayuki Kanamori, Ichiyo Shibahara, Yoshiteru Shimoda, Yukinori Akiyama, Takaaki Beppu, Shigeo Ohba, Toshiyuki Enomoto, Takahiro Ono, Yuta Mitobe, Mitsuto Hanihara, Yohei Mineharu, Joji Ishida, Kenichiro Asano, Yasuyuki Yoshida, Manabu Natsumeda, Sadahir International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025; 30(1): 51. CrossRef
Letter to the Editor Regarding Cerebral Blood Flow Role in Delineating Treatment Effect from True Tumor Progression in Glioblastoma Multiforme Inibehe Ime Okon, Tolulope Judah Gbayisomore, Samuel Berchi Kankam, Mohammad Jalloh World Neurosurgery.2024; 186: 269. CrossRef
NTRK-fused central nervous system tumours: clinicopathological and genetic insights and response to TRK inhibitors Eric Eunshik Kim, Chul-Kee Park, Seung-Ki Kim, Ji Hoon Phi, Sun Ha Paek, Jung Yoon Choi, Hyoung Jin Kang, Joo Ho Lee, Jae Kyung Won, Hongseok Yun, Sung-Hye Park Acta Neuropathologica Communications.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Recommendation Using the Delphi Method (Version 2023.1) Min-Sung Kim, Se-Il Go, Chan Woo Wee, Min Ho Lee, Seok-Gu Kang, Kyeong-O Go, Sae Min Kwon, Woohyun Kim, Yun-Sik Dho, Sung-Hye Park, Youngbeom Seo, Sang Woo Song, Stephen Ahn, Hyuk-Jin Oh, Hong In Yoon, Sea-Won Lee, Joo Ho Lee, Kyung Rae Cho, Jung Won Choi Brain Tumor Research and Treatment.2023; 11(2): 123. CrossRef
Lymphoproliferative disorder during temozolomide therapy; a representative case of a formidable complication and management challenges Daisuke Sato, Hirokazu Takami, Shunsaku Takayanagi, Kazuki Taoka, Mariko Tanaka, Reiko Matsuura, Shota Tanaka, Nobuhito Saito BMC Neurology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Glioma angiogenesis is boosted by ELK3 activating the HIF-1$$alpha$$/VEGF-A signaling axis Mou Yueyang, Hu Yaqin, Xue Guolian, Zhao Wenjian, Jiao Yang, Li Chen, Cao Haiyan, Chao Min, Deng Jianping, Dai Penggao, Zhu Hongli, Wang Liang BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Levetiracetam as a sensitizer of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: An open‐label phase 2 study Kihwan Hwang, Junhyung Kim, Seok‐Gu Kang, Tae‐Young Jung, Jeong Hoon Kim, Se‐Hyuk Kim, Shin‐Hyuk Kang, Yong‐Kil Hong, Tae Min Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Byung Se Choi, Jong Hee Chang, Chae‐Yong Kim Cancer Medicine.2022; 11(2): 371. CrossRef
Prognostic Value and Risk Factors of Treatment-Related Lymphopenia in Malignant Glioma Patients Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yongchao Zhang, Shichao Chen, Hualei Chen, Shanshan Chen, Zhen Li, Enshan Feng, Wei Li Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
PrACTiC: A Predictive Algorithm for Chemoradiotherapy-Induced Cytopenia in Glioblastoma Patients Alireza Amouheidari, Zahra Alirezaei, Stefan Rauh, Masoud Hassanpour, Ozkan Kanat Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Relapsing High—Grade Glioma from Peritumoral Zone: Critical Review of Radiotherapy Treatment Options Maria Chiara Lo Greco, Roberto Milazzotto, Rocco Luca Emanuele Liardo, Grazia Acquaviva, Madalina La Rocca, Roberto Altieri, Francesco Certo, Giuseppe Maria Barbagallo, Antonio Basile, Pietro Valerio Foti, Stefano Palmucci, Stefano Pergolizzi, Antonio Pon Brain Sciences.2022; 12(4): 416. CrossRef
Effect of Choline Alphoscerate on the Survival of Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study Yeong Jin Kim, Tae-Kyu Lee, Myung-Giun Noh, Tae-Young Jung, In-Young Kim, Shin Jung, Kyung-Hwa Lee, Kyung-Sub Moon Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(20): 6052. CrossRef
Evaluating survival in subjects with astrocytic brain tumors by dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging Matthew L. White, Yan Zhang, Syed A. Jaffar Kazmi, Michele Aizenberg, Nicole Shonka, Fang Yu, Adams Kusi Appiah, Michael C. Burger PLOS ONE.2021; 16(1): e0244275. CrossRef
Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide Alexandra McAleenan, Claire Kelly, Francesca Spiga, Ashleigh Kernohan, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Sarah Dawson, Lena Schmidt, Tomos Robinson, Sebastian Brandner, Claire L Faulkner, Christopher Wragg, Sarah Jefferies, Amy Howell, Luke Vale, Julian P T Higgins, Kathr Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Mixed malignant glioblastoma and schwannoma in spinal cord with metachronous ependymoma: A case report Mostafa Farzin, Mohamadreza Hajiabadi, Mohammad Rahmani, Kasra Kolahdouzan Clinical Case Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective cohort study Srinivas Annavarapu, Anagha Gogate, Trang Pham, Kalatu Davies, Prianka Singh, Nicholas Robert CNS Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Number of Adjuvant Temozolomide Cycles in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Fahimeh Attarian, Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary, Azar Fanipakdel, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Pejman Porouhan, Babak PeyroShabany, Danial Fazilat-Panah Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Tumor treating fields plus temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a sub-group analysis of Korean patients in the EF-14 phase 3 trial Chae-Yong Kim, Sun Ha Paek, Do-hyun Nam, Jong-Hee Chang, Yong-Kil Hong, Jeong Hoon Kim, Oh Lyong Kim, Se-Hyuk Kim Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2020; 146(3): 399. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment in High-Grade Glioma Patients Treated with Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Qiang Wang, Fengxia Xiao, Fei Qi, Xiaopeng Song, Yonghua Yu Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(2): 586. CrossRef
Immunotherapy for gliomas: shedding light on progress in preclinical and clinical development Maria B. Garcia-Fabiani, Maria Ventosa, Andrea Comba, Marianela Candolfi, Alejandro J. Nicola Candia, Mahmoud S. Alghamri, Padma Kadiyala, Stephen Carney, Syed M. Faisal, Anna Schwendeman, James J. Moon, Lindsay Scheetz, Joerg Lahann, Ava Mauser, Pedro R. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs.2020; 29(7): 659. CrossRef
Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 1094 Promotes Initiation and Progression of Glioblastoma by Promoting microRNA-577-Regulated Stabilization of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
Xiaoyan Dong, Xiuxin Fu, Miao Yu, Zengfen Li Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 5619. CrossRef
SNHG7 Facilitates Glioblastoma Progression by Functioning as a Molecular Sponge for MicroRNA-449b-5p and Thereby Increasing MYCN Expression Yaogang Chen, Shaoyong Yuan, Tieying Ning, Huiqing Xu, Bo Guan Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Combined effects of niclosamide and temozolomide against human glioblastoma tumorspheres Hyeong-Cheol Oh, Jin-Kyoung Shim, Junseong Park, Ji-Hyun Lee, Ran Joo Choi, Nam Hee Kim, Hyun Sil Kim, Ju Hyung Moon, Eui Hyun Kim, Jong Hee Chang, Jong In Yook, Seok-Gu Kang Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2020; 146(11): 2817. CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics of High-Grade Glioma with Primary Leptomeningeal Seeding at Initial Diagnosis in a Single Center Study Ji-Eyon Kwon, Kihwan Hwang, Kyeong-O Go, Chan Woo Wee, In Ah Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Gheeyoung Choe, Byung Se Choi, Jung Ho Han, Chae-Yong Kim Brain Tumor Research and Treatment.2020; 8(2): 77. CrossRef
A Longitudinal Study of Lipid Peroxidation and Symptom Clusters in Patients With Brain Cancers Sanghee Kim Nursing Research.2018; 67(5): 387. CrossRef
Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) Perfusion MR in the Prediction of Long-Term Survival of Glioblastomas (GBM): Correlation with MGMT Promoter Methylation and 1p/19q Deletions Yong Wonn Kwon, Won-Jin Moon, Mina Park, Hong Gee Roh, Young Cho Koh, Sang Woo Song, Jin Woo Choi Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2018; 22(3): 158. CrossRef
Notch1ablation radiosensitizes glioblastoma cells Na Han, Guangyuan Hu, Lei Shi, Guoxian Long, Lin Yang, Qingsong Xi, Qiuyun Guo, Jianhua Wang, Zhen Dong, Mengxian Zhang Oncotarget.2017; 8(50): 88059. CrossRef
Impact of epidemiological characteristics of supratentorial gliomas in adults brought about by the 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system Haihui Jiang, Yong Cui, Junmei Wang, Song Lin Oncotarget.2017; 8(12): 20354. CrossRef
Min Kyu Kang, Dongryul Oh, Kwan Ho Cho, Sung Ho Moon, Hong-Gyun Wu, Dae-Seog Heo, Yong Chan Ahn, Keunchil Park, Hyo Jung Park, Jun Su Park, Ki Chang Keum, Jihye Cha, Jun Won Kim, Yeon-Sil Kim, Jin Hyoung Kang, Young-Taek Oh, Ji-Yoon Kim, Sung Hwan Kim, Jin-Hee Kim, Chang Geol Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):425-425. Published online January 10, 2016
Min Kyu Kang, Dongryul Oh, Kwan Ho Cho, Sung Ho Moon, Hong-Gyun Wu, Dae-Seog Heo, Yong Chan Ahn, Keunchil Park, Hyo Jung Park, Jun Su Park, Ki Chang Keum, Jihye Cha, Jun Won Kim, Yeon-Sil Kim, Jin Hyoung Kang, Young-Taek Oh, Ji-Yoon Kim, Sung Hwan Kim, Jin-Hee Kim, Chang Geol Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):871-878. Published online February 13, 2015
Purpose To define the role of neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma, we compared the treatment outcomes of patients treated with curative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Materials and Methods From 2004 to 2011, 138 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 2002 stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated with curative radiotherapy in 12 hospitals in South Korea. Treatment methods included radiotherapy alone in 34 patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy alone in seven, concurrent chemoradiotherapy in 80, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in 17. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in 42 patients. Total radiation dose ranged from 64 Gy to 74.2 Gy (median, 70 Gy).
Results Median follow-up was 48 months (range, 7 to 97 months) for all patients. At the last followup, 13 patients had died and 32 had experienced treatment failure; locoregional failure occurred in 14, distant failure in 16, and both in two. Five-year locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 86.2%, 85.5%, 74.4%, and 88.2%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the significant prognostic factors were concurrent chemotherapy and N stage for locoregional relapse-free survival, concurrent chemotherapy for progression-free survival, and age and N stage for overall survival. Neither neoadjuvant nor concurrent chemotherapy improved distant metastasis-free survival. Conclusion Concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival and progression-free survival in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve either.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in older patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched cohort study Fang Wang, Lu Zhou, Li-Jun Zhang, Chang-Bin Xie, Zhi-Wei Liao, Xiao-Dan Lin, Yue-Feng Wen Radiotherapy and Oncology.2024; 191: 110081. CrossRef
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Radiotherapy Alone in the Treatment of Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Yao-Can Xu, Kai-Hua Chen, Zhong-Guo Liang, Xiao-Dong Zhu Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
MRI-identified multidimensional nodal features predict survival and concurrent chemotherapy benefit for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma Yang Liu, Jianghu Zhang, Jingbo Wang, Runye Wu, Xiaodong Huang, Kai Wang, Yuan Qu, Xuesong Chen, Yexiong Li, Ye Zhang, Junlin Yi Radiology and Oncology.2022; 56(4): 479. CrossRef
The efficacy of chemotherapy in survival of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma Xin-Bin Pan, Ling Li, Song Qu, Long Chen, Shi-Xiong Liang, Xiao-Dong Zhu Oral Oncology.2020; 101: 104520. CrossRef
Survival of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with or without concurrent chemotherapy: A propensity score matching study Di‐Han Liu, Xiao‐Yu Zhou, You‐Guang Pan, Si Chen, Zheng‐Hao Ye, Gang‐Dong Chen Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(4): 1287. CrossRef
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Induction Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Update Ting Jin, Qun Zhang, Dong-Hua Luo, Feng Jiang, Qi-Feng Jin, Yuan-Yuan Chen, Xiao-Zhong Chen, Wei-Min Mao Translational Oncology.2020; 13(1): 25. CrossRef
Predictive factors of chemotherapy use in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma Xin-Bin Pan, Shi-Ting Huang, Kai-Hua Chen, Yan-Ming Jiang, Xiao-Dong Zhu Medicine.2019; 98(7): e14512. CrossRef
The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Retrospective analysis of the national cancer database Zaheer Ahmed, Lara Kujtan, Kevin Kennedy, Valerie Wood, David Schomas, Janakiraman Subramanian Cancer Medicine.2019; 8(4): 1500. CrossRef
Patterns of Failure and Survival Trends in 3,808 Patients with Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosed from 1990 to 2012: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort Study Xue-Song Sun, Di-Han Liu, Sai-Lan Liu, Qiu-Yan Chen, Shan-Shan Guo, Yue-Feng Wen, Li-Ting Liu, Hao-Jun Xie, Qing-Nan Tang, Yu-Jing Liang, Xiao-Yun Li, Jin-Jie Yan, Ming-Huang Hong, Jun Ma, Lin-Quan Tang, Hai-Qiang Mai Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(4): 1449. CrossRef
Combined chemoradiation vs radiation therapy alone in stage-II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis of the published literature Sufang Wang, Shan Li, Liangfang Shen Current Problems in Cancer.2018; 42(3): 302. CrossRef
The efficacy of induction chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in intensity modulated radiotherapy era Pei-Jing Li, Hao-Yuan Mo, Dong-Hua Luo, Wei-Han Hu, Ting Jin Oral Oncology.2018; 85: 95. CrossRef
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy degrades the quality of life of patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma as compared to radiotherapy Xin-Bin Pan, Shi-Ting Huang, Kai-Hua Chen, Yan-Ming Jiang, Jia-Lin Ma, Song Qu, Ling Li, Long Chen, Xiao-Dong Zhu Oncotarget.2017; 8(8): 14029. CrossRef
Chemotherapy use and survival in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma Xin-Bin Pan, Shi-Ting Huang, Kai-Hua Chen, Xiao-Dong Zhu Oncotarget.2017; 8(60): 102573. CrossRef
Long-term survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with Stage II in intensity-modulated radiation therapy era Qiaojuan Guo, Tianzhu Lu, Shaojun Lin, Jingfeng Zong, Zhuhong Chen, Xiaofei Cui, Yu Zhang, Jianji Pan Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2016; 46(3): 241. CrossRef
Comparison of the efficacy between concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma Kai-Hua Chen, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Ling Li, Song Qu, Zhen-Qiang Liang, Xia Liang, Xin-Bin Pan, Zhong-Guo Liang, Yan-Ming Jiang Oncotarget.2016; 7(42): 69041. CrossRef
Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era Lu-Ning Zhang, Yuan-Hong Gao, Xiao-Wen Lan, Jie Tang, Zhen Su, Jun Ma, Wuguo Deng, Pu-Yun OuYang, Fang-Yun Xie Oncotarget.2015; 6(41): 44019. CrossRef
Min Kyu Kang, Yong Chan Ahn, Won Park, Keunchil Park, Chung Hwan Baek, Young Ik Son, Jeong Eun Lee, Young Je Park, Hee Rim Nam, Kyoung Ju Kim, Do Hoon Lim, Seung Jae Huh
Cancer Res Treat. 2003;35(5):391-399. Published online October 31, 2003
PURPOSE Here, our results from a prospective treatment protocol of concurrent radiochemotherapy (CRCT), which was conducted for locally advanced nasopharynx cancers, between April 1994 and May 2001, are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 consecutive eligible patients were accumulated for this protocol. The median radiation doses to the primary site, involved nodes and uninvolved neck were 72, 61.2 and 45 Gy, using a serial shrinking field technique. The boost techniques were 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in 45, intracavitary brachytherapy in 3 and 2-dimensional radiation therapy, with multiple small fields, in 2 patients. Two chemotherapy regimens were used: the first regimen, used in 8 patients during the earlier part of the study duration, consisted of 2 cycles of cisplatin plus 5- fluorouracil every 4 weeks, with concurrent radiation therapy, and 4 cycles with the same agents every 4 weeks, adjuvantly; the second regimen, used in 44 patients during the later part, consisted of 3 cycles of cisplatin every 3 weeks, with concurrent radiation therapy and 3 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The median follow-up period of the survivors was 32 months. The male to female ratio was 36/16, with a median age of 48 years. The stages, according to the new AJCC staging system (1997), were IIb in 6, III in 23, IVa in 14 and IVb in 9 patients. Fifty and 32 patients completed the planned radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, respectively. Two patients died, 1 of septic shock during the CRCT and the other of malnutrition during the adjuvant chemotherapy. There were 12 failures in 11 patients: 7 locoregional recurrences, 1 within and 6 outside the radiation target volume, and 5 distant metastases. The locoregional control, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 84.3, 78.8 and 92.8% at 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: High dose radiation therapy, coupled with concurrent chemotherapy, was judged a highly effective treatment for locally advanced nasopharynx cancers.