Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
23 "Kyung Hae Jung"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Ten-Year Follow-Up Clinical Outcomes and the Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Patients with Microinvasive Breast Cancer
Yeokyeong Shin, Soo-Young Lee, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, BeomSeok Ko, Ji Sun Kim, Il Yong Chung, Hee Jin Lee, Gyungyub Gong, Sae Byul Lee, Jae Ho Jeong
Received November 22, 2024  Accepted March 3, 2025  Published online March 5, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.1120    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Although HER2 positivity is prevalent in microinvasive breast cancer (MIBC), data focused on HER2-positive MIBC are limited. We investigated the clinical course and long-term outcomes of HER2-positive MIBC and evaluated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
The study included patients with curatively resected pT1mi pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer between January 2000 and January 2020. Treatments and survival outcomes, including invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
Results
The analysis included 799 female patients. The median age was 51 years (range, 23–79), and 51.6% (n=412) were premenopausal. Multifocality was confirmed in 17.3% (n=138), and estrogen receptor (ER) positivity in 29.8% (n = 238). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 17.5% (n=140), with doxifluridine in 96.4% of cases. One patient (0.1%) received trastuzumab. With a median follow-up of 119.0 months (95% CI, 114.0–127.0), the 8-year IBCFS, DRFS, and OS were 91.2% (95% CI, 89.1–93.3), 97.5% (95% CI, 96.4–98.7), and 98.8% (95% CI, 98.0–99.6), respectively. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. The lack of differences in IBCFS by chemotherapy was consistent across subgroups, including pre-/postmenopausal patients, grade 1-2/3 tumors, and ER-negative disease.
Conclusion
A clinically meaningful proportion of HER2-positive MIBC patients experience IBCFS events with long-term follow-up. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve survival, potentially due to the use of an outdated, ineffective regimen. The role of modern adjuvant regimens, particularly those incorporating HER2-targeted therapy, warrants further exploration.
  • 304 View
  • 28 Download
Close layer
General
The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group
Bum Jun Kim, Chi Hoon Maeng, Bhumsuk Keam, Young-Hyuck Im, Jungsil Ro, Kyung Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Tae Won Kim, Jae Lyun Lee, Dae Seog Heo, Sang-We Kim, Keunchil Park, Myung-Ju Ahn, Byoung Chul Cho, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang, Jae Yong Cho, Hwan Jung Yun, Byung-Ho Nam, Dae Young Zang
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(1):39-46.   Published online July 10, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.421
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) is a nationwide cancer clinical trial group dedicated to advancing investigator-initiated trials (IITs) by conducting and supporting clinical trials. This study aims to review IITs conducted by KCSG and quantitatively evaluate the survival and financial benefits of IITs for patients.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed IITs conducted by KCSG from 1998 to 2023, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) gains for participants. PFS and OS benefits were calculated as the difference in median survival times between the intervention and control groups, multiplied by the number of patients in the intervention group. Financial benefits were assessed based on the cost of investigational products provided.
Results
From 1998 to 2023, KCSG conducted 310 IITs, with 133 completed and published. Of these, 21 were included in the survival analysis. The analysis revealed that 1,951 patients in the intervention groups gained a total of 2,558.4 months (213.2 years) of PFS and 2,501.6 months (208.5 years) of OS, with median gains of 1.31 months in PFS and 1.58 months in OS per patient. When analyzing only statistically significant results, PFS and OS gain per patients was 1.69 months and 3.02 months, respectively. Investigational drug cost analysis from six available IITs indicated that investigational products provided to 252 patients were valued at 10,400,077,294 won (approximately 8,046,481 US dollars), averaging about 41,270,148 won (approximately 31,930 US dollars) per patient.
Conclusion
Our findings, based on analysis of published research, suggest that IITs conducted by KCSG led to survival benefits for participants and, in some studies, may have provided financial benefits by providing investment drugs.
  • 1,560 View
  • 140 Download
Close layer
Breast cancer
Efficacy of Limited Dose Modifications for Palbociclib-Related Grade 3 Neutropenia in Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Seul-Gi Kim, Min Hwan Kim, Sejung Park, Gun Min Kim, Jee Hung Kim, Jee Ye Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Seho Park, Byeong Woo Park, Seung Il Kim, Jung Hwan Ji, Joon Jeong, Kabsoo Shin, Jieun Lee, Hyung-Don Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Joohyuk Sohn
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1198-1209.   Published online April 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1543
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Frequent neutropenia hinders uninterrupted palbociclib treatment in patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive breast cancer. We compared the efficacy outcomes in multicenter cohorts of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) receiving palbociclib following conventional dose modification or limited modified schemes for afebrile grade 3 neutropenia.
Materials and Methods
Patients with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative mBC (n=434) receiving palbociclib with letrozole as first-line therapy were analyzed and classified based on neutropenia grade and afebrile grade 3 neutropenia management as follows: group 1 (maintained palbociclib dose, limited scheme), group 2 (dose delay or reduction, conventional scheme), group 3 (no afebrile grade 3 neutropenia event), and group 4 (grade 4 neutropenia event). The primary and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) between groups 1 and 2 and PFS, overall survival, and safety profiles among all groups.
Results
During follow-up (median 23.7 months), group 1 (2-year PFS, 67.9%) showed significantly longer PFS than did group 2 (2-year PFS, 55.3%; p=0.036), maintained across all subgroups, and upon adjustment of the factors. Febrile neutropenia occurred in one and two patients of group 1 and group 2, respectively, without mortality.
Conclusion
Limited dose modification for palbociclib-related grade 3 neutropenia may lead to longer PFS, without increasing toxicity, than the conventional dose scheme.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and Safety of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies
    Hui-Chen Su, Ho-Wei Lin, Ka-Wai Tam
    Targeted Oncology.2025; 20(1): 71.     CrossRef
  • Palbociclib Is Safe for Breast Cancer Patients With Mild Hepatic Impairment: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Using Real‐World Data
    Alieke K. Bos, Annelieke E.C.A.B. Willemsen, Loes E. Visser, Lennart J. Stoker, Jurjen S. Kingma, Mirjam K. Rommers, Emile M. Kuck, Paul D. van der Linden, Merel van Nuland
    Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2025; 117(4): 1115.     CrossRef
  • Real-world effectiveness of CDK4/6i in first-line treatment of HR+/HER2− advanced/metastatic breast cancer: updated systematic review
    Nadia Harbeck, Adam Brufsky, Chloe Grace Rose, Beata Korytowsky, Connie Chen, Krista Tantakoun, Endri Jazexhi, Do Hoang Vien Nguyen, Meaghan Bartlett, Imtiaz A. Samjoo, Timothy Pluard
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Palbociclib

    Reactions Weekly.2023; 1988(1): 138.     CrossRef
  • 4,305 View
  • 272 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Impacts of Subtype on Clinical Feature and Outcome of Male Breast Cancer: Multicenter Study in Korea (KCSG BR16-09)
Jieun Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Heejung Chae, Joohyuk Sohn, Gun Min Kim, Kyung-Hee Lee, Su Hwan Kang, Kyung Hae Jung, Jae-ho Jeong, Jae Ho Byun, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Seungtaek Lim, Hee Jun Kim, Hye Sung Won, Hyung Soon Park, Guk Jin Lee, Soojung Hong, Sun Kyung Baek, Soon Il Lee, Moon Young Choi, In Sook Woo
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(1):123-135.   Published online March 24, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.1561
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The treatment of male breast cancer (MBC) has been extrapolated from female breast cancer (FBC) because of its rarity despite their different clinicopathologic characteristics. We aimed to investigate the distribution of intrinsic subtypes based on immunohistochemistry, their clinical impact, and treatment pattern in clinical practice through a multicenter study in Korea.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 248 MBC patients from 18 institutions across the country from January 1995 to July 2016.
Results
The median age of MBC patients was 63 years (range, 25 to 102 years). Among 148 intrinsic subtype classified patients, 61 (41.2%), 44 (29.7%), 29 (19.5%), and 14 (9.5%) were luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively. Luminal A subtype showed trends for superior survival compared to other subtypes. Most hormone receptor-positive patients (166 patients, 82.6%) received adjuvant endocrine treatment. Five-year completion of adjuvant endocrine treatment was associated with superior disease-free survival (DFS) in patients classified with an intrinsic subtype (hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.49; p=0.002) and in all patients (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.54; p=0.003).
Conclusion
Distribution of subtypes of MBC was similar to FBC and luminal type A was most common. Overall survival tended to be improved for luminal A subtype, although there was no statistical significance. Completion of adjuvant endocrine treatment was associated with prolonged DFS in intrinsic subtype classified patients. MBC patients tended to receive less treatment. MBC patients should receive standard treatment according to guidelines as FBC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • HER2 expression and pathway status in male breast cancer patients: results of an integrated analysis among 6,150 patients
    Boqiang Lyu, Shidi Zhao, Hui Wang, Shouping Gong, Biyuan Wang
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Male breast cancer - a single center experience
    Igor Djurisic, Milan Zegarac, Milan Kocic, Vladimir Jokic, Nikola Vucic, Ognjen Petrovic, Nada Santrac, Jovana Koncar, Andjela Ivezic, Srdjan Nikolic
    Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo.2025; 153(1-2): 53.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Features and Prognoses of Male Patients With Breast Cancer
    Meiling Huang, Jingjing Xiao, Changjiao Yan, Rui Ling, Ting Wang
    American Journal of Men's Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,008 View
  • 181 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Lung and Thoracic cancer
Integrin αvβ3 Induces HSP90 Inhibitor Resistance via FAK Activation in KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Shinkyo Yoon, Hannah Yang, Hyun-Min Ryu, Eunjin Lee, Yujin Jo, Seyoung Seo, Deokhoon Kim, Chang Hoon Lee, Wanlim Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Sook Ryun Park, Eun Kyung Choi, Sang-We Kim, Kang-Seo Park, Dae Ho Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):767-781.   Published online September 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.651
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Heat shock protein-90 (HSP90) remains an important cancer target because of its involvement in multiple oncogenic protein pathways and biologic processes. Although many HSP90 inhibitors have been tested in the treatment of KRAS-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most, including AUY922, have failed due to toxic effects and resistance generation, even though a modest efficacy has been observed for these drugs in clinical trials. In our present study, we investigated the novel mechanism of resistance to AUY922 to explore possible avenues of overcoming and want to provide some insights that may assist with the future development of successful next-generation HSP90 inhibitors.
Materials and Methods
We established two AUY922-resistant KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells and conducted RNA sequencing to identify novel resistance biomarker.
Results
We identified novel two resistance biomarkers. We observed that both integrin Av (ITGAv) and β3 (ITGB3) induce AUY922-resistance via focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation, as well as an epithelial-mesenchymal transition, in both in vitro and in vivo xenograft model. mRNAs of both ITGAv and ITGB3 were also found to be elevated in a patient who had shown acquired resistance in a clinical trial of AUY922. ITGAv was induced by miR-142 downregulation, and ITGB3 was increased by miR-150 downregulation during the development of AUY922-resistance. Therefore, miR-150 and miR-142 overexpression effectively inhibited ITGAvB3-dependent FAK activation, restoring sensitivity to AUY922.
Conclusion
The synergistic co-targeting of FAK and HSP90 attenuated the growth of ITGAvB3-induced AUY922-resistant KRAS-mutated NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that this combination may overcome acquired AUY922-resistance in KRAS-mutant NSCLC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Integrin αV Inhibition by GMI, a Ganoderma Microsporum Immunomodulatory Protein, Abolish Stemness and Migration in EGFR‐Mutated Lung Cancer Cells Resistant to Osimertinib
    Yu‐Ting Kang, Hui‐Yi Chang, Ya‐Chu Hsieh, Chia‐Hsuan Chou, I‐Lun Hsin, Jiunn‐Liang Ko
    Environmental Toxicology.2024; 39(12): 5238.     CrossRef
  • Junctional adhesion molecular 3 (JAM3) is a novel tumor suppressor and improves the prognosis in breast cancer brain metastases via the TGF-β/Smad signal pathway
    Kaitao Zhu, Shiwei Li, Hongru Yao, Jilong Hei, WenGuo Jiang, Tracey Martin, Shanyi Zhang
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2024; 170(2): 331.     CrossRef
  • Autophagy, molecular chaperones, and unfolded protein response as promoters of tumor recurrence
    Bashar Alhasan, Marina Mikeladze, Irina Guzhova, Boris Margulis
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.2023; 42(1): 217.     CrossRef
  • 9,083 View
  • 277 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Breast cancer
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Clinical Outcome of Everolimus Followed by CDK4/6 Inhibitors with the Opposite Treatment Sequence in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Hyehyun Jeong, Jae Ho Jeong, Jeong Eun Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):469-477.   Published online June 23, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.205
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
In hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+ HER2–MBC), the mainstay treatment options include cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and everolimus (EVE) in combination with endocrine treatment. This study aims to compare the outcomes of the following treatment sequences: CDK4/6i followed by EVE and EVE followed by CDK4/6i.
Materials and Methods
Data from HR+ HER2– MBC patients treated between January 2014 and November 2020 with both CDK4/6i and EVE were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Among the 88 patients included in the study, 51 received CDK4/6i before EVE (C→E group), and 37 received EVE before CDK4/6i (E→C group) with endocrine treatment. More patients in the E→C group had endocrine resistance (13.7% vs. 40.5%), experienced palliative chemotherapy (7.8% vs. 40.5%), and were heavily treated (treated as ≥ 3rd line, 5.9% vs. 40.5%). Median overall survival was 46.8 months in the C→E group and 38.9 months in the E→C group (p=0.151). Median composite progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the start of the preceding regimen to disease progression on the following regimen or death, was 24.8 months in the C→E group vs. 21.8 months in the E→C group (p=0.681). Median PFS2/PFS1 ratio did not differ significantly between groups (0.5 in the C→E group, 0.6 in the E→C group; p=0.775). Ten patients (11.4%) discontinued EVE, and two patients (2.3%) discontinued CDK4/6i during treatment.
Conclusion
Although the CDK4/6i-based regimen should be considered as an earlier line of treatment, CDK4/6i- and EVE-based treatments can be valid options in circumstances where the other treatment had been already given.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The different sequences of CDK4/6 inhibitor and mTOR inhibitor in HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer: A multicenter real-world study
    Yuqian Liao, Yujing Tan, Yipeng Li, Fei Ma, Jiayu Wang, Pin Zhang, Qing Li, Qiao Li, Yang Luo, Bo Lan, Shanshan Chen, Binghe Xu, Hanfang Jiang, Weihong Zhao, Ying Fan
    Heliyon.2024; 10(19): e38147.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Results with Everolimus in Advanced Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer in a Multicenter National Real-World Observational Study
    Hélène François-Martin, Audrey Lardy-Cléaud, Barbara Pistilli, Christelle Levy, Véronique Diéras, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, Séverine Guiu, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Audrey Mailliez, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Thierry Petit, Mony Ung, Isabelle Desmoulins, Paule
    Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1191.     CrossRef
  • Selective protection of normal cells from chemotherapy, while killing drug-resistant cancer cells
    Mikhail V. Blagosklonny
    Oncotarget.2023; 14(1): 193.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of computational approaches to understand cancer biology for informed drug repurposing
    Faheem Ahmed, Anupama Samantasinghar, Afaque Manzoor Soomro, Sejong Kim, Kyung Hyun Choi
    Journal of Biomedical Informatics.2023; 142: 104373.     CrossRef
  • Tetraspanin 1 (TSPAN1) promotes growth and transferation of breast cancer cells via mediating PI3K/Akt pathway
    Yange Wu, Wenxiu Chen, Yufeng Gong, Hongxia Liu, Bo Zhang
    Bioengineered.2021; 12(2): 10761.     CrossRef
  • 6,988 View
  • 218 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Breast Cancer
Implications of Tamoxifen Resistance in Palbociclib Efficacy for Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of KCSG-BR15-10 (YoungPEARL)
Jiyun Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Gun Min Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Seok Yun Kang, In Hae Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(3):695-702.   Published online December 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1246
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
YoungPEARL (KCSG-BR15-10) trial demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian function suppression compared to capecitabine. However, the number of tamoxifen-sensitive premenopausal patients was small because most recurrences occurred early during adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), with tamoxifen being the only drug used; hence, the data for these patients were limited. Here we present a subgroup analysis according to tamoxifen sensitivity from the YoungPEARL study. Materials and Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive palbociclib+ET (oral exemestane 25 mg/day for 28 days, palbociclib 125 mg/day for 21 days, plus leuprolide 3.75 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy (oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks). Tamoxifen resistance was defined as: relapse while on adjuvant tamoxifen, relapse within 12 months of completing adjuvant tamoxifen, or progression while on first-line tamoxifen within 6 months for MBC.
Results
In total, 184 patients were randomized and 178 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. PFS improvement in the palbociclib+ET group was observed in tamoxifen-sensitive patients (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 1.19). Furthermore, palbociclib+ET prolonged median PFS compared with capecitabine in tamoxifen-sensitive (20.5 months vs. 12.6 months) and tamoxifen-resistant (20.1 months vs. 14.5 months) patients. Palbociclib+ET demonstrated a higher rate of objective response, disease control, and clinical benefit in tamoxifen-sensitive patients. Conclusion This post hoc exploratory analysis suggests that palbociclib+ET is a promising therapeutic option for premenopausal HR+/HER2– MBC patients irrespective of tamoxifen sensitivity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive and HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study in the northwest of China
    Jiao Yang, Bing Zhao, Xiaoling Ling, Donghui Li, Jiuda Zhao, Yonggang Lv, Guangxi Wang, Xinlan Liu, Nanlin Li, Jin Yang
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,309 View
  • 278 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
A Nomogram for Predicting the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Women with T1-3N0-1miM0 Hormone Receptor‒Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)‒Negative Breast Cancer
Sae Byul Lee, Junetae Kim, Guiyun Sohn, Jisun Kim, Il Yong Chung, Hee Jeong Kim, Beom Seok Ko, Byung Ho Son, Sei-Hyun Ahn, Jong Won Lee, Kyung Hae Jung
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1073-1085.   Published online November 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.357
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This preliminary study was conducted to evaluate the association between Oncotype DX (ODX) recurrence score and traditional prognostic factors. We also developed a nomogram to predict subgroups with low ODX recurrence scores (less than 25) and to avoid additional chemotherapy treatments for those patients.
Materials and Methods
Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical variables were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed from a series of 485 T1-3N0-1miM0 hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2‒negative breast cancer patients with available ODX test results at Asan Medical Center from 2010 to 2016. One hundred twenty-seven patients (26%) had positive axillary lymph node micrometastases, and 408 (84%) had ODX recurrence scores of ≤25. Logistic regression was performed to build a nomogram for predicting a low-risk subgroup of the ODX assay.
Results
Multivariate analysis revealed that estrogen receptor (ER) score, progesterone receptor (PR) score, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and Ki-67 had a statistically significant association with the low-risk subgroup. With these variables, we developed a nomogram to predict the low-risk subgroup with ODX recurrence scores of ≤25. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 0.96). When applied to the validation group the nomogram was accurate with an area under the curve = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95).
Conclusion
The low ODX recurrence score subgroup can be predicted by a nomogram incorporating five traditional prognostic factors: ER, PR, histologic grade, LVI, and Ki-67. Our nomogram, which predicts a low-risk ODX recurrence score, will be a useful tool to help select patients who may or may not need additional ODX testing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Novel Nomogram for Estimating a High-Risk Result in the EndoPredict® Test for Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Negative Breast Carcinoma
    Víctor Macarrón, Itsaso Losantos-García, Alberto Peláez-García, Laura Yébenes, Alberto Berjón, Laura Frías, Covadonga Martí, Pilar Zamora, José Ignacio Sánchez-Méndez, David Hardisson
    Cancers.2025; 17(2): 273.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy, safety, and predictive model of Palbociclib in the treatment of HR-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Wei Wang, Wenqian Lei, Ziru Fang, Ruiyuan Jiang, Xiaojia Wang
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a clinical breast cancer tool for accurate prediction of recurrence
    Asim Dhungana, Augustin Vannier, Fangyuan Zhao, Jincong Q. Freeman, Poornima Saha, Megan Sullivan, Katharine Yao, Elbio M. Flores, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Alexander T. Pearson, Dezheng Huo, Frederick M. Howard
    npj Breast Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Based on Systematic Evaluation of Ki-67 Scores in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer
    Ji Min Kim, Eun Yoon Cho
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2024; 27(3): 201.     CrossRef
  • Development of a nomogram to predict recurrence scores obtained using Oncotype DX in Japanese patients with breast cancer
    Akio Shibata, Nobuko Tamura, Keiichi Kinowaki, Aya Nishikawa, Kiyo Tanaka, Yoko Kobayashi, Takuya Ogura, Yuko Tanabe, Hidetaka Kawabata
    Breast Cancer.2024; 31(6): 1018.     CrossRef
  • Shear-wave elastography-based nomograms predicting 21-gene recurrence score for adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients with breast cancer
    Ji Hyun Youk, Eun Ju Son, Joon Jeong, Hye Mi Gweon, Na Lae Eun, Jeong-Ah Kim
    European Journal of Radiology.2023; 158: 110638.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Using Clinicopathological Variables in Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer
    Min Chong Kim, Sun Young Kwon, Jung Eun Choi, Su Hwan Kang, Young Kyung Bae
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2023; 26(2): 105.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Oncotype DX Risk Group in Patients with ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
    Ran Song, Dong-Eun Lee, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Jai Hong Han, Keun Seok Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Heejung Chae, Youngmee Kwon, Jaeyeon Woo, So-Youn Jung
    Cancers.2023; 15(18): 4451.     CrossRef
  • A simplified risk scoring system for predicting high-risk groups in gene expression tests for patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-positive breast cancer
    Kwang Hyun Yoon, Suk Jun Lee, Yujin Kim, Jee Hyun Ahn, Jee Ye Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Seung Il Kim, Seho Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 360.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning-Based Pathology Image Analysis Enhances Magee Feature Correlation With Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score
    Hongxiao Li, Jigang Wang, Zaibo Li, Melad Dababneh, Fusheng Wang, Peng Zhao, Geoffrey H. Smith, George Teodoro, Meijie Li, Jun Kong, Xiaoxian Li
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel Surrogate Nomogram Capable of Predicting OncotypeDX Recurrence Score©
    Matthew G. Davey, Amirhossein Jalali, Éanna J. Ryan, Ray P. McLaughlin, Karl J. Sweeney, Michael K. Barry, Carmel M. Malone, Maccon M. Keane, Aoife J. Lowery, Nicola Miller, Michael J. Kerin
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(7): 1117.     CrossRef
  • Use of a supervised machine learning model to predict Oncotype DX risk category in node-positive patients older than 50 years of age
    Austin D. Williams, Kate R. Pawloski, Hannah Y. Wen, Varadan Sevilimedu, Donna Thompson, Monica Morrow, Mahmoud El-Tamer
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 196(3): 565.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score in Predicting Axillary Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Jaime A. Pardo, Betty Fan, Alessandra Mele, Stephanie Serres, Monica G. Valero, Isha Emhoff, Amulya Alapati, Ted A. James
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(3): 1320.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram to predict the high-risk RS in HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients older than 50 years of age
    Jing Yu, Jiayi Wu, Ou Huang, Jianrong He, Li Zhu, Weiguo Chen, Yafen Li, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological correlates, oncological impact, and validation of Oncotype DX™ in a European Tertiary Referral Centre
    Matthew G. Davey, Éanna J. Ryan, Sami Abd Elwahab, Jessie A. Elliott, Peter F. McAnena, Karl J. Sweeney, Carmel M. Malone, Ray McLaughlin, Michael K. Barry, Maccon M. Keane, Aoife J. Lowery, Michael J. Kerin
    The Breast Journal.2021; 27(6): 521.     CrossRef
  • Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and diffusion-weighted image as predictors of lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer
    Bo Bae Choi
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score for regional recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Minji Koh, Jinhong Jung, Su Ssan Kim, Seung Do Ahn, Eun Kyung Choi, Il Yong Chung, Jong Won Lee, Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Ho Jeong
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 188(3): 583.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
    Young Joo Lee, Young Sol Hwang, Junetae Kim, Sei-Hyun Ahn, Byung Ho Son, Hee Jeong Kim, Beom Seok Ko, Jisun Kim, Il Yong Chung, Jong Won Lee, Sae Byul Lee
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of a Nomogram to Predict the Recurrence Score of 21-Gene Prediction Assay in Hormone Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer
    Shin Hye Yoo, Tae-Yong Kim, Miso Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Eunshin Lee, Han-Byoel Lee, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Sae-Won Han, Tae-You Kim, Seock-Ah Im
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • Ki‐67 index, progesterone receptor expression, histologic grade and tumor size in predicting breast cancer recurrence risk: A consecutive cohort study
    Yanna Zhang, Yidong Zhou, Feng Mao, Ru Yao, Qiang Sun
    Cancer Communications.2020; 40(4): 181.     CrossRef
  • Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update
    Kimberly H. Allison, M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Mitchell Dowsett, Shannon E. McKernin, Lisa A. Carey, Patrick L. Fitzgibbons, Daniel F. Hayes, Sunil R. Lakhani, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Jane Perlmutter, Charles M. Perou, Meredith M. Regan, David L. Rimm, W
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2020; 144(5): 545.     CrossRef
  • Oncotype DX Predictive Nomogram for Recurrence Score Output: The Novel System ADAPTED01 Based on Quantitative Immunochemistry Analysis
    Fabio Marazzi, Roberto Barone, Valeria Masiello, Valentina Magri, Antonino Mulè, Angela Santoro, Federica Cacciatori, Luca Boldrini, Gianluca Franceschini, Francesca Moschella, Giuseppe Naso, Silverio Tomao, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Giovanna Mantini,
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(5): e600.     CrossRef
  • 12,792 View
  • 338 Download
  • 27 Web of Science
  • 22 Crossref
Close layer
Landscape of Actionable Genetic Alterations Profiled from 1,071 Tumor Samples in Korean Cancer Patients
Se-Hoon Lee, Boram Lee, Joon Ho Shim, Kwang Woo Lee, Jae Won Yun, Sook-Young Kim, Tae-You Kim, Yeul Hong Kim, Young Hyeh Ko, Hyun Cheol Chung, Chang Sik Yu, Jeeyun Lee, Sun Young Rha, Tae Won Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Sukki Cho, Jin Hyoung Kang, Jihun Kim, Sang Kyum Kim, Han Suk Ryu, Sang Yun Ha, Jong Il Kim, Yeun-Jun Chung, Cheolmin Kim, Hyung-Lae Kim, Woong-Yang Park, Dong-Young Noh, Keunchil Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):211-222.   Published online April 23, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.132
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
With the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, profiling a wide range of genomic alterations has become a possibility resulting in improved implementation of targeted cancer therapy. In Asian populations, the prevalence and spectrum of clinically actionable genetic alterations has not yet been determined because of a lack of studies examining high-throughput cancer genomic data.
Materials and Methods
To address this issue, 1,071 tumor samples were collected from five major cancer institutes in Korea and analyzed using targeted NGS at a centralized laboratory. Samples were either fresh frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) and the quality and yield of extracted genomic DNA was assessed. In order to estimate the effect of sample condition on the quality of sequencing results, tissue preparation method, specimen type (resected or biopsied) and tissue storage time were compared.
Results
We detected 7,360 non-synonymous point mutations, 1,164 small insertions and deletions, 3,173 copy number alterations, and 462 structural variants. Fifty-four percent of tumors had one or more clinically relevant genetic mutation. The distribution of actionable variants was variable among different genes. Fresh frozen tissues, surgically resected specimens, and recently obtained specimens generated superior sequencing results over FFPE tissues, biopsied specimens, and tissues with long storage duration.
Conclusion
In order to overcome, challenges involved in bringing NGS testing into routine clinical use, a centralized laboratory model was designed that could improve the NGS workflows, provide appropriate turnaround times and control costs with goal of enabling precision medicine.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical implementation of next-generation sequencing testing and genomically-matched therapy: a real-world data in a tertiary hospital
    Jin Won Kim, Hee Young Na, Sejoon Lee, Ji-Won Kim, Koung Jin Suh, Se Hyun Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Keun-Wook Lee, Jong Seok Lee, Jaihwan Kim, Jin-Hyeok Hwang, Kihwan Hwang, Chae-Yong Kim, Yong Beom Kim, Soomin Ahn, Kyu Sang Lee, Hyojin Kim, Hye Seung Lee, So Yeo
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Real-World Data and Clinical Implications of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-Based Analysis in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
    Fabio Canino, Antonio Tornincasa, Stefania Bettelli, Samantha Manfredini, Monica Barbolini, Luca Moscetti, Claudia Omarini, Angela Toss, Fabio Tamburrano, Giuseppina Antonelli, Federica Baglio, Lorenzo Belluzzi, Giulio Martinelli, Salvatore Natalizio, Orn
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(5): 2490.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the DNA methylome of Korean patients with colorectal cancer consolidates the clinical implications of cancer-associated methylation markers
    Sejoon Lee, Kil-yong Lee, Ji-Hwan Park, Duck-Woo Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Seong-Taek Oh, Jongbum Jeon, Dongyoon Lee, Soobok Joe, Hoang Bao Khanh Chu, Jisun Kang, Jin-Young Lee, Sheehyun Cho, Hyeran Shim, Si-Cho Kim, Hong Seok Lee, Young-Joon Kim, Jin Ok Yang,
    BMB Reports.2024; 57(3): 161.     CrossRef
  • Establishing molecular pathology curriculum for pathology trainees and continued medical education: a collaborative work from the Molecular Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists
    Jiwon Koh, Ha Young Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jun Kang, Uiju Cho, Seung Eun Lee, Haeyoun Kang, Min Eui Hong, Jae Kyung Won, Youn-La Choi, Wan-Seop Kim, Ahwon Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2023; 57(5): 265.     CrossRef
  • Quality and Quantity of Nucleic Acids Extracted from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Lymphoma Biopsies from Nigerian Archived Biopsy
    IC Uzoma, IA Taiwo, NI Ugwu, MA Durosinmi, O Akinloye
    Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.2023; 26(12): 1854.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group
    Shinkyo Yoon, Miso Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Han Sang Kim, Seung Tae Kim, Jihun Kim, Hongseok Yun, Changhoon Yoo, Hee Kyung Ahn, Hyo Song Kim, In Hee Lee, In-Ho Kim, Inkeun Park, Jae Ho Jeong, Jaekyung Cheon, Jin Won Kim, Jina Yun, Sun Min Lim, Yongjun Cha, Se
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 54(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • State legislative trends related to biomarker testing
    Gelareh Sadigh, Hilary Gee Goeckner, Ella A. Kazerooni, Bruce E. Johnson, Robert A. Smith, Devon V. Adams, Ruth C. Carlos
    Cancer.2022; 128(15): 2865.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Breast Cancer: Real-World Data
    Koung Jin Suh, Se Hyun Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Heechul Shin, Eunyoung Kang, Eun-Kyu Kim, Sejoon Lee, Ji Won Woo, Hee Young Na, Soomin Ahn, Bum-Sup Jang, In Ah Kim, So Yeon Park, Jee Hyun Kim
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2022; 25(5): 366.     CrossRef
  • Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Is the Black Box Finally Opening Up?
    Birgitta I. Hiddinga, Klaas Kok
    Cancers.2021; 13(2): 236.     CrossRef
  • Real‐world utility of next‐generation sequencing for targeted gene analysis and its application to treatment in lung adenocarcinoma
    Jwa Hoon Kim, Shinkyo Yoon, Dae Ho Lee, Se Jin Jang, Sung‐Min Chun, Sang‐We Kim
    Cancer Medicine.2021; 10(10): 3197.     CrossRef
  • Actionability evaluation of biliary tract cancer by genome transcriptome analysis and Asian cancer knowledgebase
    Yuki Okawa, Nobutaka Ebata, Nayoung K.D. Kim, Masashi Fujita, Kazuhiro Maejima, Shota Sasagawa, Toru Nakamura, Woong-Yang Park, Satoshi Hirano, Hidewaki Nakagawa
    Oncotarget.2021; 12(15): 1540.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of Targeted Gene Sequencing Panel Based Companion Diagnostic for Korean Patients with Solid Tumors
    Byung-Joo Min, Woo Seung Lee, Myung-Eui Seo, Kye-Hwa Lee, Seung-Yong Jeong, Ja-Lok Ku, Yeul Hong Kim, Sang-Won Shin, Ju Han Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(20): 5112.     CrossRef
  • Junction Location Identifier (JuLI)
    Hyun-Tae Shin, Nayoung K.D. Kim, Jae Won Yun, Boram Lee, Sungkyu Kyung, Ki-Wook Lee, Daeun Ryu, Jinho Kim, Joon Seol Bae, Donghyun Park, Yoon-La Choi, Se-Hoon Lee, Myung-Ju Ahn, Keunchil Park, Woong-Yang Park
    The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.2020; 22(3): 304.     CrossRef
  • Simple prediction model for homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancers in adolescents and young adults
    Tomoko Watanabe, Takayuki Honda, Hirohiko Totsuka, Masayuki Yoshida, Maki Tanioka, Kouya Shiraishi, Yoko Shimada, Eri Arai, Mineko Ushiama, Kenji Tamura, Teruhiko Yoshida, Yae Kanai, Takashi Kohno
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 182(2): 491.     CrossRef
  • 14,734 View
  • 468 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
Randomized Open Label Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane: PROCEED Trial (KCSG BR 11-01)
In Hae Park, Seock-Ah Im, Kyung Hae Jung, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Yeon Hee Park, Keun Seok Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Kyong-Hwa Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Byung Ho Nam, Hee-Jun Kim, Tae-Yong Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Suee Lee, Jungsil Ro
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):43-52.   Published online February 14, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.562
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We investigated whether irinotecan plus capecitabine improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine alone in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) negative and anthracycline and taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
Materials and Methods
A total of 221 patients were randomly assigned to irinotecan (80 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) and capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day, days 1-14) or capecitabine alone (1,250 mg/m2 twice a day, days 1-14) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS.
Results
There was no significant difference in PFS between the combination and monotherapy arm (median, 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.11; p=0.84). In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, n=90), the combination significantly improved PFS (median, 4.7 months vs. 2.5 months; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.91; p=0.02). Objective response rate was numerically higher in the combination arm, though it failed to reach statistical significance (44.4% vs. 33.3%, p=0.30). Overall survival did not differ between arms (median, 20.4 months vs. 24.0 months; p=0.63). While grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common in the combination arm (39.6% vs 9.0%), hand-foot syndrome was more often observed in capecitabine arm. Quality of life measurements in global health status was similar. However, patients in the combination arm showed significantly worse symptom scales especially in nausea/vomiting and diarrhea.
Conclusion
Irinotecan plus capecitabine did not prove clinically superior to single-agent capecitabine in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated HER2 negative MBC patients. Toxicity profiles of the two groups differed but were manageable. The role of added irinotecan in patients with TNBC remains to be elucidated.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group
    Bum Jun Kim, Chi Hoon Maeng, Bhumsuk Keam, Young-Hyuck Im, Jungsil Ro, Kyung Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Tae Won Kim, Jae Lyun Lee, Dae Seog Heo, Sang-We Kim, Keunchil Park, Myung-Ju Ahn, Byoung Chul Cho, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang, Jae Yong Cho, Hwan Jung Yu
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Second-Line Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of the Clinical Evidence
    José Ángel García-Saenz, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Josefina Cruz, Joan Albanell, Emilio Alba, Antonio Llombart
    Targeted Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Targeting EMSY-mediated methionine metabolism is a potential therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer
    Cui-Cui Liu, Lie Chen, Yu-Wen Cai, Yu-Fei Chen, Yi-Ming Liu, Yu-Jie Zhou, Zhi-Ming Shao, Ke-Da Yu
    Cell Reports Medicine.2024; 5(2): 101396.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel in taxane‐pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients
    Weili Xiong, Ting Xu, Xiao Liu, Lili Zhang, Yuan Yuan
    Cancer.2024; 130(S8): 1488.     CrossRef
  • Eribulin plus carboplatin combination for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, real-world cohort study
    Mengqian Ni, Lijia Zhou, Yongkui Lu, Dachuan Guo, Xiuyue Li, Lixia Li, Lidong Zhang, Meiting Chen, Lulu Zhang, Fei Xu, Zhongyu Yuan, Shusen Wang, Yanxia Shi, Anli Yang, Xin An
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Subgroup analyses from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Sara A. Hurvitz, Aditya Bardia, Kevin Punie, Kevin Kalinsky, Lisa A. Carey, Hope S. Rugo, Véronique Diéras, See Phan, Rosemary Delaney, Yanni Zhu, Sara M. Tolaney
    npj Breast Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Dual Bispecific Hydrolysis Peptide‐Drug Conjugate Responsive to Micro‐Acidic and Reduction Circumstance Promotes Antitumor Efficacy in Triple‐Negative Breast Cancer
    Tingting Tang, Naiyu Liu, Lingjuan Wang, Kaiyue Zuo, Xinjie Zhu
    ChemBioChem.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Synergizing Immunotherapy and Antibody–Drug Conjugates: New Horizons in Breast Cancer Therapy
    Antonello Pinto, Chiara Guarini, Marianna Giampaglia, Valeria Sanna, Assunta Melaccio, Laura Lanotte, Anna Natalizia Santoro, Francesca Pini, Antonio Cusmai, Francesco Giuliani, Gennaro Gadaleta-Caldarola, Palma Fedele
    Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(9): 1146.     CrossRef
  • Preliminary results from ASCENT-J02: a phase 1/2 study of sacituzumab govitecan in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors
    Yoichi Naito, Seigo Nakamura, Nobuko Kawaguchi-Sakita, Takanori Ishida, Takahiro Nakayama, Yutaka Yamamoto, Norikazu Masuda, Koji Matsumoto, Takahiro Kogawa, Kazuki Sudo, Akihiko Shimomura, Catherine Lai, Danjie Zhang, Yuki Iwahori, Dianna Gary, Danh Huyn
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 29(11): 1684.     CrossRef
  • A Phase IIb, single arm, multicenter trial of sacituzumab govitecan in Chinese patients with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer who received at least two prior treatments
    Binghe Xu, Fei Ma, Tao Wang, Shusen Wang, Zhongsheng Tong, Wei Li, Xinhong Wu, Xiaojia Wang, Tao Sun, Yueyin Pan, Herui Yao, Xian Wang, Ting Luo, Jin Yang, Xiaohua Zeng, Weihong Zhao, Xiuyu Julie Cong, Jiongjie Chen
    International Journal of Cancer.2023; 152(10): 2134.     CrossRef
  • Update on Classic and Novel Approaches in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review
    Salvatore Greco, Nicolò Fabbri, Riccardo Spaggiari, Alfredo De Giorgi, Fabio Fabbian, Antonio Giovine
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(6): 1772.     CrossRef
  • Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Jiao Xie, SiNi Li, YaMin Li, JianHe Li
    BMC Health Services Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Triple negative breast cancer: second and successive lines of treatment
    Fernando Henao Carrasco, Sara Leal Sánchez
    Revisiones en Cáncer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • TROPION-Breast02: Datopotamab deruxtecan for locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Rebecca A Dent, David W Cescon, Thomas Bachelot, Kyung Hae Jung, Zhi-Ming Shao, Shigehira Saji, Tiffany A Traina, Petra Vukovic, Darlington Mapiye, Micah J Maxwell, Peter Schmid, Javier Cortés
    Future Oncology.2023; 19(35): 2349.     CrossRef
  • An integrated analysis of Sacituzumab govitecan in relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Shao-Xian Cheng, Qiu-Chi Chen, Guo-He Lin, Yan-Hong Han, Bi-Cheng Wang, Yi Dai, Yan-Xia Zhao
    Medicine.2023; 102(30): e34486.     CrossRef
  • Post-marketing safety surveillance of sacituzumab govitecan: an observational, pharmacovigilance study leveraging FAERS database
    Wensheng Liu, Qiong Du, Zihan Guo, Xuan Ye, Jiyong Liu
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Sacituzumab on Breast Cancer: Target Therapy
    Elina Armani Khatibi, Tooba Gholikhani, Balam Jimenez Brito, Nastaran Farshbaf Moghimi
    Biomedical Research Bulletin.2023; 1(4): 141.     CrossRef
  • The Place of Chemotherapy in The Evolving Treatment Landscape for Patients With HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC
    Chris Twelves, Rupert Bartsch, Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch, Simona Borstnar, Luc Dirix, Petra Tesarova, Constanta Timcheva, Lyudmila Zhukova, Xavier Pivot
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2022; 22(3): 223.     CrossRef
  • Quality-of-life methodology in hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer: Current tools and perspectives for the future
    Fatima Cardoso, David Cella, Galina Velikova, Victoria Harmer, Eva Schumacher-Wulf, Julie Rihani, Ana Casas, Nadia Harbeck
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2022; 102: 102321.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive metabolomics expands precision medicine for triple-negative breast cancer
    Yi Xiao, Ding Ma, Yun-Song Yang, Fan Yang, Jia-Han Ding, Yue Gong, Lin Jiang, Li-Ping Ge, Song-Yang Wu, Qiang Yu, Qing Zhang, François Bertucci, Qiuzhuang Sun, Xin Hu, Da-Qiang Li, Zhi-Ming Shao, Yi-Zhou Jiang
    Cell Research.2022; 32(5): 477.     CrossRef
  • Major advancements in metastatic breast cancer treatment: when expanding options means prolonging survival
    F. Miglietta, M. Bottosso, G. Griguolo, M.V. Dieci, V. Guarneri
    ESMO Open.2022; 7(2): 100409.     CrossRef
  • Association of Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Cancer Drug Trials With Survival Outcomes and Drug Class
    Joseph N. Samuel, Christopher M. Booth, Elizabeth Eisenhauer, Michael Brundage, Scott R. Berry, Bishal Gyawali
    JAMA Oncology.2022; 8(6): 879.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of patients without and with an initial triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis in the phase 3 randomized ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Adam Brufsky, Hope S. Rugo, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Sagar Sardesai, Erika Hamilton, Delphine Loirat, Tiffany Traina, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Sara A. Hurvitz, Kevin Kalinsky, Aditya Bardia, Stephanie Henry, Ingrid Mayer, Yanni Zhu, S
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 195(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Sacituzumab govitecan as second-line treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer—phase 3 ASCENT study subanalysis
    Lisa A. Carey, Delphine Loirat, Kevin Punie, Aditya Bardia, Véronique Diéras, Florence Dalenc, Jennifer R. Diamond, Christel Fontaine, Grace Wang, Hope S. Rugo, Sara A. Hurvitz, Kevin Kalinsky, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Sibylle Loibl, Luca Gianni, Martine Picc
    npj Breast Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Safety analyses from the phase 3 ASCENT trial of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Hope S. Rugo, Sara M. Tolaney, Delphine Loirat, Kevin Punie, Aditya Bardia, Sara A. Hurvitz, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Javier Cortés, Véronique Diéras, Lisa A. Carey, Luca Gianni, Martine J. Piccart, Sibylle Loibl, David M. Goldenberg, Quan Hong, Martin Olivo,
    npj Breast Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Apatinib plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who failed first/second-line treatment: the NAN trial
    Dou-Dou Li, Zhong-hua Tao, Bi-Yun Wang, Lei-Ping Wang, Jun Cao, Xi-Chun Hu, Jian Zhang
    npj Breast Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combination treatment of radiofrequency ablation and peptide neoantigen vaccination: Promising modality for future cancer immunotherapy
    Jiawei Shou, Fan Mo, Shanshan Zhang, Lantian Lu, Ning Han, Liang Liu, Min Qiu, Hongseng Li, Weidong Han, Dongying Ma, Xiaojie Guo, Qianpeng Guo, Qinxue Huang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Shengli Ye, Hongming Pan, Shuqing Chen, Yong Fang
    Frontiers in Immunology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A prospective, open-label, multicenter phase IV clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer
    Min Yan, Peng Yuan, Quchang Ouyang, Ying Cheng, Guohui Han, Dewei Wang, Li Ran, Tao Sun, Da Zhao, Yuju Bai, Shun’e Yang, Xiaojia Wang, Rong Wu, Xiaohua Zeng, Herui Yao, Xuening Ji, Jun Jiang, Xiaohua Hu, Haifeng Lin, Liping Zheng, Zhitu Zhu, Wei Ge, Junla
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Phase I study of liposomal irinotecan in patients with metastatic breast cancer: findings from the expansion phase
    Jasgit C. Sachdev, Pamela Munster, Donald W. Northfelt, Hyo Sook Han, Cynthia Ma, Fiona Maxwell, Tiffany Wang, Bruce Belanger, Bin Zhang, Yan Moore, Arunthathi Thiagalingam, Carey Anders
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 185(3): 759.     CrossRef
  • Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Aditya Bardia, Sara A. Hurvitz, Sara M. Tolaney, Delphine Loirat, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Adam Brufsky, Sagar D. Sardesai, Kevin Kalinsky, Amelia B. Zelnak, Robert Weaver, Tiffany Traina, Florence Dalenc, Philippe Aftimos, Filipa Lynce, Sami Diab,
    New England Journal of Medicine.2021; 384(16): 1529.     CrossRef
  • Glembatumumab vedotin for patients with metastatic, gpNMB overexpressing, triple-negative breast cancer (“METRIC”): a randomized multicenter study
    Linda T. Vahdat, Peter Schmid, Andres Forero-Torres, Kimberly Blackwell, Melinda L. Telli, Michelle Melisko, Volker Möbus, Javier Cortes, Alberto J. Montero, Cynthia Ma, Rita Nanda, Gail S. Wright, Yi He, Thomas Hawthorne, Rebecca G. Bagley, Abdel-Baset H
    npj Breast Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Occult triple negative male breast cancer. The usefulness of molecular platforms. A case report
    Angelats L, Estival A, Martinez-Cardús A, Musulen E, Margelí M
    Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports.2021; : 100097.     CrossRef
  • A Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Irinotecan-Based Regimens in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes
    Jiaojiao Suo, Xiaorong Zhong, Ping He, Hong Zheng, Tinglun Tian, Xi Yan, Ting Luo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies
    Ellen Cusano, Chelsea Wong, Eddy Taguedong, Marcus Vaska, Tasnima Abedin, Nancy Nixon, Safiya Karim, Patricia Tang, Daniel Y. C. Heng, Doreen Ezeife
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 4894.     CrossRef
  • High Antitumor Activity of the Dual Topoisomerase Inhibitor P8-D6 in Breast Cancer
    Inken Flörkemeier, Tamara N. Steinhauer, Nina Hedemann, Jörg Paul Weimer, Christoph Rogmans, Marion T. van Mackelenbergh, Nicolai Maass, Bernd Clement, Dirk O. Bauerschlag
    Cancers.2021; 14(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients treated in phase I clinical trials at University of Colorado Cancer Center
    Jennifer A. Weiss, Andrew Nicklawsky, Jodi A. Kagihara, Dexiang Gao, Christine Fisher, Anthony Elias, Virginia F. Borges, Peter Kabos, Sarah L. Davis, Stephen Leong, Sue Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R. Diamond
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(23): 8801.     CrossRef
  • Chemotherapy Options beyond the First Line in HER-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Vito Lorusso, Agnese Latorre, Francesco Giotta, Ozkan Kanat
    Journal of Oncology.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Aditya Bardia, Ingrid A. Mayer, Linda T. Vahdat, Sara M. Tolaney, Steven J. Isakoff, Jennifer R. Diamond, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Rebecca L. Moroose, Alessandro D. Santin, Vandana G. Abramson, Nikita C. Shah, Hope S. Rugo, David M. Goldenberg, Ala M. Sweidan
    New England Journal of Medicine.2019; 380(8): 741.     CrossRef
  • An open label phase 1 study evaluation safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose of oral administration of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine
    I. Kümler, R. L. Eefsen, Peter Grundtvig Sørensen, S. Theile, A. Fullerton, P. G. Nielsen, Benny Vittrup Jensen, D. L. Nielsen
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2019; 84(2): 441.     CrossRef
  • Exploiting DNA repair defects in breast cancer: from chemotherapy to immunotherapy
    Burak Yasin Aktas, Gurkan Guner, Deniz Can Guven, Cagatay Arslan, Omer Dizdar
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(7): 589.     CrossRef
  • Sacituzumab govitecan: breakthrough targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer
    Jennifer Weiss, Ashley Glode, Wells A. Messersmith, Jennifer Diamond
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(8): 673.     CrossRef
  • The role of capecitabine and eribulin in the treatment of metastatic HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    I V Kolyadina, I V Poddubnaya
    Journal of Modern Oncology.2018; 20(3): 26.     CrossRef
  • 10,820 View
  • 453 Download
  • 38 Web of Science
  • 42 Crossref
Close layer
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
In Hae Park, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Sung Bae Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Joo Seop Chung, Soo Hyeon Lee, Tae You Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Eun Kyung Cho, Yang Soo Kim, Hong Suk Song, Jae Hong Seo, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sun Ah Lee, So Young Yoon, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Kim, Mi Ryung Jin, Jungsil Ro
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):569-577.   Published online September 12, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol).
Materials and Methods
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).
Results
The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m2 (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m2 (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (pnon-inferiority=0.021, psuperiority=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments.
Conclusion
Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Revolutionizing cancer treatment: ROS-induced apoptosis via nanoformulated alkaloids
    Swathi Putta, Santhosh Kumar Chinnaiyan, Ramadevi Korni, Venkata Radha Gadela
    Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.2025; 104: 106556.     CrossRef
  • A drug-eluting balloon catheter coated with chitosan and paclitaxel-loaded poloxamer-stabilized PLA microparticles for the effective treatment of cholangiocarcinoma
    Jin Sil Lee, Jaehee Jang, Hyeryeon Oh, Eunhye Lee, Don Haeng Lee, Panmo Son, Daekyung Sung, Won Il Choi
    Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanomicellar Prodrug Delivery of Glucose-Paclitaxel: A Strategy to Mitigate Paclitaxel Toxicity
    Didi Yan, Xinyue Ma, Yixin Hu, Guogang Zhang, Beibei Hu, Bo Xiang, Xiaokun Cheng, Yongshuai Jing, Xi Chen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2025; Volume 20: 2087.     CrossRef
  • Administration of Inhibitory Molecules through Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Therapy
    Christian Rafael Quijia, Andreina Quevedo Enríquez, Carlos Daniel Zappia, Roxana Noemí Peroni, Marlus Chorilli
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 31(6): 726.     CrossRef
  • Innovative strategies for effective paclitaxel delivery: Recent developments and prospects
    Sławomir Wileński, Agnieszka Koper, Paulina Śledzińska, Marek Bebyn, Krzysztof Koper
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2024; 30(2): 367.     CrossRef
  • Effect of zwitterionic sulfobetaine incorporation on blood behaviours, phagocytosis, and in vivo biodistribution of pH-responsive micelles with positive charges
    Chengwei Wang, Hao Liu, Hu Lin, Rui Zhong, Hao Li, Jiaxin Liu, Xianglin Luo, Meng Tian
    Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2024; 12(6): 1652.     CrossRef
  • Reexamining in vivo fate of paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelles
    Shiqi Lin, Yifei Yu, Ercan Wu, Tianhao Ding, Yuxiu Chu, Feng Pan, Yang Yang, Changyou Zhan
    Nano Today.2024; 56: 102255.     CrossRef
  • Functionalized Polymeric Micelles for Targeted Cancer Therapy: Steps from Conceptualization to Clinical Trials
    Ana Serras, Célia Faustino, Lídia Pinheiro
    Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(8): 1047.     CrossRef
  • Polyester nanoparticles delivering chemotherapeutics: Learning from the past and looking to the future to enhance their clinical impact in tumor therapy
    Giuseppe Longobardi, Thomas Lee Moore, Claudia Conte, Francesca Ungaro, Ronit Satchi‐Fainaro, Fabiana Quaglia
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research progress of paclitaxel nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
    Jia-xin Qiao, Dong-yan Guo, Huan Tian, Zhan-peng Wang, Qiang-qiang Fan, Yuan Tian, Jing Sun, Xiao-fei Zhang, Jun-bo Zou, Jiang-xue Cheng, Fei Luan, Bing-tao Zhai
    Materials Today Bio.2024; 29: 101358.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology in cancer therapeutics, diagnosis, and management
    Disha Hazarika, Sumit Sarma, Priyanka Shankarishan
    BioTechnologia.2024; 105(3): 287.     CrossRef
  • Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis of Porous Biomolecule‐Incorporated Metal‐Organic Frameworks as Efficient Nanocarriers for Anti‐Cancer Drugs
    Trang Thi Thu Nguyen, Bao Quang Gia Le, Vy Tran Hanh Nguyen, Jae‐Hyoung Lee, Ngoc Xuan Dat Mai, Linh Ho Thuy Nguyen, Tan Le Hoang Doan
    ChemistrySelect.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Innovative nanotheranostics: Smart nanoparticles based approach to overcome breast cancer stem cells mediated chemo‐ and radioresistances
    Prithwish Kola, Prasanth Kumar Bhusetty Nagesh, Pritam Kumar Roy, K. Deepak, Rui Luis Reis, Subhas C. Kundu, Mahitosh Mandal
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer metastases: Current and future perspectives
    Mangala Hegde, Nikunj Naliyadhara, Jyothsna Unnikrishnan, Mohammed S. Alqahtani, Mohamed Abbas, Sosmitha Girisa, Gautam Sethi, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara
    Cancer Letters.2023; 556: 216066.     CrossRef
  • Influence of lung cancer model characteristics on tumor targeting behavior of nanodrugs
    Weixia Xu, Shengmin Yang, Linwei Lu, Qianzhu Xu, Sunyi Wu, Jianfen Zhou, Jiashen Lu, Xingyan Fan, Nana Meng, Yuan Ding, Xudong Zheng, Weiyue Lu
    Journal of Controlled Release.2023; 354: 538.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Breast Cancer: Review of Emerging Nanotherapeutics
    Ranga Dissanayake, Rheal Towner, Marya Ahmed
    Cancers.2023; 15(11): 2906.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Nanopaclitaxel Formulation for Cancer Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials
    Xiangmin Deng, Xiaoqin Huang, Xiaoyan Dong, Genxiang Mao, Wenmin Xing
    Nanomedicine.2023; 18(10): 833.     CrossRef
  • Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer
    João P. N. Silva, Bárbara Pinto, Luís Monteiro, Patrícia M. A. Silva, Hassan Bousbaa
    Pharmaceutics.2023; 15(6): 1653.     CrossRef
  • Nano delivery system for paclitaxel: Recent advances in cancer theranostics
    Na Ying, Sisi Liu, Mengmeng Zhang, Jing Cheng, Linghuan Luo, Jiayi Jiang, Gaofan Shi, Shu Wu, Jun Ji, Haoyuan Su, Hongzhi Pan, Dongdong Zeng
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2023; 228: 113419.     CrossRef
  • Current Perspectives on Paclitaxel: Focus on Its Production, Delivery and Combination Therapy
    Yibin Liu, Fenglan Zhao, Qibao Wang, Qingjie Zhao, Guige Hou, Qingguo Meng
    Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.2023; 23(18): 1780.     CrossRef
  • Current perspectives and trends in nanoparticle drug delivery systems in breast cancer: bibliometric analysis and review
    Sheng Sun, Ye-hui Wang, Xiang Gao, He-yong Wang, Lu Zhang, Na Wang, Chun-mei Li, Shao-quan Xiong
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Paclitaxel prodrug-encapsulated polypeptide micelles with redox/pH dual responsiveness for cancer chemotherapy
    Jinyu Liu, Yanhao Zhang, Chao Liu, Yuhao Jiang, Zihao Wang, Xinsong Li
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2023; 645: 123398.     CrossRef
  • Biodegradable polyester-based nano drug delivery system in cancer chemotherapy: a review of recent progress (2021–2023)
    Zongheng Wang, Miaomiao Xiao, Fangliang Guo, Yue Yan, Hong Tian, Qianshi Zhang, Shuangyi Ren, Liqun Yang
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of triblock copolymeric micelles based on α- and ε-poly(L-lysine): a Cornelian choice
    Franck Marquet, Viorica Patrulea, Gerrit Borchard
    Polymer Journal.2022; 54(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Current understandings and clinical translation of nanomedicines for breast cancer therapy
    Yike Jiang, Ziyi Jiang, Mingzhe Wang, Lan Ma
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 180: 114034.     CrossRef
  • Poly(ϵ-Caprolactone)-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol (PCL-MPEG)-Based Micelles for Drug-Delivery: The Effect of PCL Chain Length on Blood Components, Phagocytosis, and Biodistribution
    Zemin Hou, Wencheng Zhou, Xi Guo, Rui Zhong, Ao Wang, Jiehua Li, Ying Cen, Chao You, Hong Tan, Meng Tian
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2022; Volume 17: 1613.     CrossRef
  • Engineered nanomaterials as an effective tool for HER2+ breast cancer therapy
    Prashant Pandey, Dilip Kumar Arya, Mohan Kumar Ramar, Kumarappan Chidambaram, P.S. Rajinikanth
    Drug Discovery Today.2022; 27(9): 2526.     CrossRef
  • Biophysical Characterization of Interactions between Serum Albumin and Block Copolymer Micelles
    Catherine F. Dial, Richard A. Gemeinhart
    ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.2022; 8(7): 2899.     CrossRef
  • Micelles in Cancer Therapy: An Update on Preclinical and Clinical Status
    Rabia Aqeel, Nidhi Srivastava, Poonam Kushwaha
    Recent Patents on Nanotechnology.2022; 16(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Challenging the fundamental conjectures in nanoparticle drug delivery for chemotherapy treatment of solid cancers
    Juanjuan Yang, Xiaojin Wang, Bingshun Wang, Kinam Park, Karen Wooley, Shiyi Zhang
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 190: 114525.     CrossRef
  • In Vivo Sustained Release of the Retrograde Transport Inhibitor Retro-2.1 Formulated in a Thermosensitive Hydrogel
    Robin Vinck, Laetitia Anvi Nguyen, Mathilde Munier, Lucie Caramelle, Diana Karpman, Julien Barbier, Alain Pruvost, Jean-Christophe Cintrat, Daniel Gillet
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(23): 14611.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Translation of Self‐Assembled Cancer Nanomedicines
    Peng Mi, Kanjiro Miyata, Kazunori Kataoka, Horacio Cabral
    Advanced Therapeutics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From Conventional to Precision Therapy in Canine Mammary Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Guillermo Valdivia, Ángela Alonso-Diez, Dolores Pérez-Alenza, Laura Peña
    Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced Biotechnologies: Collections of Plant Cell Cultures As a Basis for Development and Production of Medicinal Preparations
    E. V. Popova, A. V. Nosov, M. V. Titova, D. V. Kochkin, A. A. Fomenkov, I. E. Kulichenko, A. M. Nosov
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.2021; 68(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation
    Xin Luan, Hebao Yuan, Yudong Song, Hongxiang Hu, Bo Wen, Miao He, Huixia Zhang, Yan Li, Feng Li, Pan Shu, Joseph P. Burnett, Nathan Truchan, Maria Palmisano, Manjunath P. Pai, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao, Duxin Sun
    Biomaterials.2021; 275: 120910.     CrossRef
  • Breast cancer: Muscarinic receptors as new targets for tumor therapy
    Alejandro Español, Agustina Salem, Yamila Sanchez, María Elena Sales
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 12(6): 404.     CrossRef
  • Direct Comparison of Analogous Amphiphilic Gradient and Block Polyoxazolines
    Lenka Loukotová, Pavel Švec, Ondřej Groborz, Tomáš Heizer, Hynek Beneš, Helena Raabová, Tereza Bělinová, Vít Herynek, Martin Hrubý
    Macromolecules.2021; 54(17): 8182.     CrossRef
  • Challenges towards Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Nanomedicines
    Muhammad Nadeem Hafeez, Christian Celia, Vilma Petrikaite
    Processes.2021; 9(9): 1527.     CrossRef
  • Drug Delivery of Natural Products Through Nanocarriers for Effective Breast Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Literature
    Kah Min Yap, Mahendran Sekar, Shivkanya Fuloria, Yuan Seng Wu, Siew Hua Gan, Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, Chandrakant Kokare, Pei Teng Lum, M Yasmin Begum, Shankar Mani, Dhanalekshmi Unnikrishnan Meenakshi, Kathiresan V Sathasiva
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2021; Volume 16: 7891.     CrossRef
  • Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study)
    Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Hong Seo, Jin-Hee Ahn, Tae-Yong Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Joohyuk Sohn, Yaewon Yang, Kyong Hwa Park, Yong Wha Moon, Seungtaek Lim, Myoung Joo Kang, Koung Eun Yoon, Hyun Ju Cho, Keun Seok Lee
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Self-assembly of oxidation-responsive polyethylene glycol-paclitaxel prodrug for cancer chemotherapy
    Chengyuan Dong, Quan Zhou, Jiajia Xiang, Fusheng Liu, Zhuxian Zhou, Youqing Shen
    Journal of Controlled Release.2020; 321: 529.     CrossRef
  • Clinical applications of nanomedicine in cancer therapy
    Mohammad Norouzi, Mehrnaz Amerian, Mahshid Amerian, Fatemeh Atyabi
    Drug Discovery Today.2020; 25(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • Improvement of Paclitaxel-Associated Adverse Reactions (ADRs) via the Use of Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis


    Pi-Ling Chou, Ya-Ping Huang, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kun-Ming Rau, Yi-Ping Fang
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 1731.     CrossRef
  • Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Adam S. Komorowski, Helen J. MacKay, Rossanna C. Pezo
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(14): 5035.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges
    Saeid Kargozar, Francesco Baino, Sepideh Hamzehlou, Michael R. Hamblin, Masoud Mozafari
    Chemical Society Reviews.2020; 49(14): 5008.     CrossRef
  • Furry nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization of nanoemulsion-mediated core crosslinked nanoparticles and their robust stability in vivo
    Rena Tanaka, Koichi Arai, Jun Matsuno, Miyo Soejima, Ji Ha Lee, Rintaro Takahashi, Kazuo Sakurai, Shota Fujii
    Polymer Chemistry.2020; 11(27): 4408.     CrossRef
  • Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval
    Duhyeong Hwang, Jacob D. Ramsey, Alexander V. Kabanov
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2020; 156: 80.     CrossRef
  • What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right
    Duxin Sun, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao
    ACS Nano.2020; 14(10): 12281.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis of PCL–PEG–PCL Triblock Copolymer via Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization and Its Application as an Injectable Hydrogel—An Interdisciplinary Learning Trial
    Kaiting Wu, Lin Yu, Jiandong Ding
    Journal of Chemical Education.2020; 97(11): 4158.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical-Based Nanomedicine for Advanced Cancer Theranostics: Perspectives on Clinical Trials to Clinical Use


    Madhusmita Dhupal, Devasish Chowdhury
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 9125.     CrossRef
  • A Compressive Review about Taxol®: History and Future Challenges
    Julia Gallego-Jara, Gema Lozano-Terol, Rosa Alba Sola-Martínez, Manuel Cánovas-Díaz, Teresa de Diego Puente
    Molecules.2020; 25(24): 5986.     CrossRef
  • Recent Clinical Developments of Nanomediated Drug Delivery Systems of Taxanes for the Treatment of Cancer
    Ruben AG van Eerden, Ron HJ Mathijssen, Stijn LW Koolen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 8151.     CrossRef
  • Basic principles of drug delivery systems – the case of paclitaxel
    S. Ezrahi, A. Aserin, N. Garti
    Advances in Colloid and Interface Science.2019; 263: 95.     CrossRef
  • Biomolecules Turn Self-Assembling Amphiphilic Block Co-polymer Platforms Into Biomimetic Interfaces
    Saziye Yorulmaz Avsar, Myrto Kyropoulou, Stefano Di Leone, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Wolfgang P. Meier, Cornelia G. Palivan
    Frontiers in Chemistry.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polyester Nanoparticle Encapsulation Mitigates Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    R. Ganugula, M. Deng, M. Arora, H.-L. Pan, M. N. V. Ravi Kumar
    ACS Chemical Neuroscience.2019; 10(3): 1801.     CrossRef
  • PEGylation of Ginsenoside Rg3-Entrapped Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization, and In Vitro Biological Studies
    Lijun Zhang, Junfeng Hui, Pei Ma, Yu Mi, Daidi Fan, Chenhui Zhu, Lei Chi, Yanan Dong
    Journal of Nanomaterials.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy by formulation approach
    Xiaowei Zang, Jong Bong Lee, Kiran Deshpande, Olga B. Garbuzenko, Tamara Minko, Leonid Kagan
    Journal of Controlled Release.2019; 303: 109.     CrossRef
  • Current status of nanomedicine in the chemotherapy of breast cancer
    A. I. Fraguas-Sánchez, C. Martín-Sabroso, A. Fernández-Carballido, A. I. Torres-Suárez
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2019; 84(4): 689.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Genexol-PM and Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bhumsuk Keam, Keun-Wook Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Keun-Yong Eom, Suzy Kim, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Seong Keun Kwon, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung, Ji-Won Kim, Dae Seog Heo
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • Advances in thermosensitive polymer-grafted platforms for biomedical applications
    Phung Ngan Le, Chan Khon Huynh, Ngoc Quyen Tran
    Materials Science and Engineering: C.2018; 92: 1016.     CrossRef
  • Supramolecular polymeric chemotherapy based on cucurbit[7]uril-PEG copolymer
    Hao Chen, Yueyue Chen, Han Wu, Jiang-Fei Xu, Zhiwei Sun, Xi Zhang
    Biomaterials.2018; 178: 697.     CrossRef
  • pH/NIR-Responsive Polypyrrole-Functionalized Fibrous Localized Drug-Delivery Platform for Synergistic Cancer Therapy
    Arjun Prasad Tiwari, Tae In Hwang, Jung-Mi Oh, Bikendra Maharjan, Sungkun Chun, Beom Su Kim, Mahesh Kumar Joshi, Chan Hee Park, Cheol Sang Kim
    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2018; 10(24): 20256.     CrossRef
  • The Blood Clearance Kinetics and Pathway of Polymeric Micelles in Cancer Drug Delivery
    Xuanrong Sun, Guowei Wang, Hao Zhang, Shiqi Hu, Xin Liu, Jianbin Tang, Youqing Shen
    ACS Nano.2018; 12(6): 6179.     CrossRef
  • Different Nanoformulations Alter the Tissue Distribution of Paclitaxel, Which Aligns with Reported Distinct Efficacy and Safety Profiles
    Feng Li, Huixia Zhang, Miao He, Jinhui Liao, Nianhang Chen, Yan Li, Simon Zhou, Maria Palmisano, Alex Yu, Manjunath P. Pai, Hebao Yuan, Duxin Sun
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2018; 15(10): 4505.     CrossRef
  • Emerging advances in P-glycoprotein inhibitory nanomaterials for drug delivery
    Longfa Kou, Rui Sun, Yangzom D. Bhutia, Qing Yao, Ruijie Chen
    Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery.2018; 15(9): 869.     CrossRef
  • The battle of “nano” paclitaxel
    Alexandros Marios Sofias, Michael Dunne, Gert Storm, Christine Allen
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overcoming the Road Blocks: Advancement of Block Copolymer Micelles for Cancer Therapy in the Clinic
    Loujin Houdaihed, James C. Evans, Christine Allen
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2017; 14(8): 2503.     CrossRef
  • PEG-PCL-based nanomedicines: A biodegradable drug delivery system and its application
    Philip Grossen, Dominik Witzigmann, Sandro Sieber, Jörg Huwyler
    Journal of Controlled Release.2017; 260: 46.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thermoresponsive Poly(L-lactic acid)–poly(ethylene glycol) Gel Injection on Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Rat Myocardial Infarction Model
    Shota Somekawa, Atsushi Mahara, Kazunari Masutani, Yoshiharu Kimura, Hiroshi Urakawa, Tetsuji Yamaoka
    Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.2017; 14(5): 507.     CrossRef
  • A versatile nanoplatform for synergistic combination therapy to treat human esophageal cancer
    Xin-shuai Wang, De-jiu Kong, Tzu-yin Lin, Xiao-cen Li, Yoshihiro Izumiya, Xue-zhen Ding, Li Zhang, Xiao-chen Hu, Jun-qiang Yang, She-gan Gao, Kit S Lam, Yuan-pei Li
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.2017; 38(6): 931.     CrossRef
  • 17,690 View
  • 639 Download
  • 74 Web of Science
  • 70 Crossref
Close layer
Feasibility and Efficacy of Eribulin Mesilate in Korean Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Korean Multi-center Phase IV Clinical Study Results
Yeon Hee Park, Tae Yong Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Keun-Seok Lee, In Hae Park, Joohyuk Sohn, Soo-Hyeon Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Jee Hyun Kim, Se Hyun Kim, Soo Jung Lee, Su-Jin Koh, Ki Hyeong Lee, Yoon Ji Choi, Eun Kyung Cho, Suee Lee, Seok Yun Kang, Jae Hong Seo, Sung-Bae Kim, Kyung Hae Jung
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):423-429.   Published online August 3, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.191
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Eribulin mesilate was approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC),who had received at least two chemotherapeutic regimens, including anthracycline and taxane. On the other hand, the efficacy and safety information of eribulin in Korean patients is limited by the lack of clinical trials.
Materials and Methods
In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV study, locally advanced or MBC patients were enrolled between June 2013 and April 2014 from 14 centers in Korea. One point four mg/m2 dose of eribulin was administered on days 1 and 8 of every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the frequency and intensity of the treatment emergent adverse event. The secondary endpoint was the disease control rate, which included the rate of complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease.
Results
A total of 101 patients received at least one dose of eribulin and were included in the safety set. The patients received a total of 543 treatment cycles, with a median of three cycles (range, 1 to 31 cycles). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (91.1% of patients, 48.3% of cycles). The frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, decrease in appetite, fatigue/asthenia, and myalgia/arthralgia. The peripheral neuropathy of any grade occurred in 27 patients (26.7%), including grade 3 in two patients. Disease control rate was 52.7% and 51.3% of patients in the full analysis set and per-protocol set, respectively.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated the feasible safety profile and activity of eribulin in Korean patients with MBC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness and healthcare costs of eribulin versus capecitabine among metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan
    Yu-Ju Lin, Chun-Nan Kuo, Yu Ko
    The Breast.2021; 57: 18.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive factors of eribulin in patients with heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer
    Pei-Hsin Chen, Dah-Cherng Yeh, Heng-Hsin Tung, Chin-Yao Lin
    Medicine.2021; 100(47): e27859.     CrossRef
  • Multifarious targets beyond microtubules—role of eribulin in cancer therapy
    Priya Seshadri, Barnali Deb, Prashant Kumar
    Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A nationwide, multicenter retrospective study on the effectiveness and safety of eribulin in Korean breast cancer patients (REMARK)
    Min Ho Park, Soo Jung Lee, Woo Chul Noh, Chang Wan Jeon, Seok Won Lee, Gil Soo Son, Byung-In Moon, Jin Sun Lee, Sung Soo Kang, Young Jin Suh, Geumhee Gwak, Tae Hyun Kim, Young Bum Yoo, Hyun-Ah Kim, Min Young Kim, Ju Yeon Kim, Joon Jeong
    The Breast.2020; 54: 121.     CrossRef
  • Effect of eribulin on patients with metastatic breast cancer: multicenter retrospective observational study in Taiwan
    Kun-Ming Rau, Fu Ou-Yang, Ta-Chung Chao, Yao-Lung Kuo, Tsui-Fen Cheng, Tsu-Yi Chao, Dar-Ren Chen, Yen-Dun Tzeng, Being-Whey Wang, Chun-Yu Liu, Ming-Hung Hu, Yin-Che Lu, Wei-Jen Ou, Chin-Ho Kuo, Chieh-Han Chuang, Jung-Yu Kan, Fang-Ming Chen, Ming-Feng Hou
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 170(3): 583.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and clinical parameters associated with eribulin mesylate-induced peripheral neuropathy
    Bin Zhao, Hong Zhao, Jiaxin Zhao
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2018; 128: 110.     CrossRef
  • Angiomodulators in cancer therapy: New perspectives
    Lenka Varinska, Peter Kubatka, Jan Mojzis, Anthony Zulli, Katarina Gazdikova, Pavol Zubor, Dietrich Büsselberg, Martin Caprnda, Radka Opatrilova, Iveta Gasparova, Martin Klabusay, Martin Pec, Eitan Fibach, Mariusz Adamek, Peter Kruzliak
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2017; 89: 578.     CrossRef
  • Eribulin in Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety, Efficacy and New Perspectives
    Ornella Garrone, Emanuela Miraglio, Anna Maria Vandone, Paola Vanella, Daniele Lingua, Marco C Merlano
    Future Oncology.2017; 13(30): 2759.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and relative risk of peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients treated with eribulin: a meta-analysis
    Ling Peng, Yun Hong, Xianghua Ye, Peng Shi, Junyan Zhang, Yina Wang, Qiong Zhao
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(67): 112076.     CrossRef
  • 11,948 View
  • 333 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Value of Axillary Nodal Ratio after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Se Hyun Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Tae-Yong Kim, Seock-Ah Im, In Sil Choi, Yee Soo Chae, Sun Kyung Baek, Seok Yun Kang, Sarah Park, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Yoon Ji Choi, Soohyeon Lee, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Yeon-Hee Park, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin-Hee Ahn, Sung-Bae Kim, Jee Hyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1373-1381.   Published online March 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.475
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective analysis is based on the data of 814 patientswith stage II/III breast cancer treated with four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel before surgery. We evaluated the clinical significance of LNR (3 categories: low 0-0.20 vs. intermediate 0.21-0.65 vs. high 0.66-1.00) using a Cox proportional regression model.
Results
A total of 799 patients underwent breast surgery. Pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/isN0) was achieved in 129 patients (16.1%) (hormone receptor [HR] +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] –, 34/373 [9.1%]; HER2+, 45/210 [21.4%]; triple negative breast cancer, 50/216 [23.1%]). The mean numbers of involved LN and retrieved LN were 2.70 (range, 0 to 42) and 13.98 (range, 1 to 64), respectively. The mean LNR was 0.17 (low, 574 [71.8%]; intermediate, 170 [21.3%]; high, 55 [6.9%]). In univariate analysis, LNR showed significant association with a worse relapse-free survival (3-year relapse-free survival rate 84.8% in low vs. 66.2% in intermediate vs. 54.3% in high; p < 0.001, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, LNR did not show significant association with recurrence after adjusting for other clinical factors (age, histologic grade, subtype, ypT stage, ypN stage, lymphatic or vascular invasion, and pCR). In subgroup analysis, the LNR system had good prognostic value in HR+/HER2– subtype.
Conclusion
LNR is not superior to ypN stage in predicting clinical outcome of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the prognostic value of the LNR system in HR+/HER2– patients is notable and worthy of further investigation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System
    Zhe Wang, Wei Chong, Huikun Zhang, Xiaoli Liu, Yawen Zhao, Zhifang Guo, Li Fu, Yongjie Ma, Feng Gu
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic role of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A dose-response meta-analysis
    Jinzhao Liu, Yifei Li, Weifang Zhang, Chenhui Yang, Chao Yang, Liang Chen, Mingjian Ding, Liang Zhang, Xiaojun Liu, Guozhong Cui, Yunjiang Liu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic implications of regression of metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
    Yul Ri Chung, Ji Won Woo, Soomin Ahn, Eunyoung Kang, Eun-Kyu Kim, Mijung Jang, Sun Mi Kim, Se Hyun Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, So Yeon Park
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using a novel T-lymph node ratio model to evaluate the prognosis of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients who received preoperative radiotherapy followed by mastectomy
    Yang Wang, Yuanyuan Zhao, Song Liu, Weifang Tang, Hong Gao, Xucai Zheng, Shikai Hong, Shengying Wang
    Medicine.2017; 96(42): e8203.     CrossRef
  • The genetic variants in the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway predict susceptibility and CE(A)F chemotherapy response to breast cancer and clinical outcomes
    Xiang Li, Ruishan Zhang, Zhuangkai Liu, Shuang Li, Hong Xu
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(12): 20252.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Inner Quadrant Involvement in Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ji Hyun Chang, Wan Jeon, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Yung-Jue Bang
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2016; 19(4): 394.     CrossRef
  • 11,970 View
  • 163 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Circulating Plasma Biomarkers for TSU-68, an Oral Antiangiogenic Agent, in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
Changhoon Yoo, Sung-Bae Kim, Jungsil Ro, Seock-Ah Im, Young-Hyuck Im, Jee Hyun Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Hong Suk Song, Seok Yun Kang, Hee Sook Park, Hyun-Cheol Chung
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):499-507.   Published online July 14, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.089
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study analyzed the role of plasma biomarkers for TSU-68 in a previous phase II trial comparing TSU-68 plus docetaxel and docetaxel alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
A total of 77 patients were eligible for this study (38 in the TSU-68 plus docetaxel arm and 39 in the docetaxel alone arm). Blood samples were collected prior to the start of each cycle, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)- AA, -AB, -BB, fibroblast growth factor, M30, C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were measured using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
In patients with baseline PDGF-AA ≥ median, median PFS was significantly worse in the TSU-68 plus docetaxel group than in the docetaxel alone group (5.4 months vs. 13.7 months, p=0.049), while a trend toward a PFS benefit was observed in those with baseline PDGF-AA < median (9.7 months vs. 4.0 months, p=0.18; p for interaction=0.03). In the TSU-68 plus docetaxel group, PFS showed significant association with fold changes in CRP (p=0.001), IL-6 (p < .001), PDGF-BB (p=0.02), and VEGF (p=0.047) following the first treatment cycle.
Conclusion
Baseline PDGF-AA levels and dynamics of VEGF, PDGF-BB, CRP, and IL-6 levels were predictive for the efficacy of TSU-68.
  • 11,746 View
  • 112 Download
Close layer
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine Plus Vinorelbine Followed by Docetaxel Versus Adriamycin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Changhoon Yoo, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin-Hee Ahn, Jeong Eun Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Gyung-Yub Gong, Byung-Ho Son, Sei-Hyun Ahn, Seung Do Ahn, Hak-Hee Kim, Hee Jung Shin, Woo Kun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(3):406-415.   Published online November 27, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.073
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Given the promising activity of capecitabine and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer, this randomized phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Materials and Methods Patients with operable breast cancer (n=75) were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of adriamycin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (AC-D) or four cycles of capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 (day 1-14) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (CV-D). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in the primary breast (ypT0/is). Results Most patients (84%) had locally advanced (n=41) or inflammatory breast cancer (n=22). pCR rates in the primary breast were 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 30%) and 11% (95% CI, 4% to 26%) in the AC-D and CV-D groups, respectively. The overall response rates and 5-year progression-free survival rates in the AC-D and CV-D groups were 62% and 64%, and 51.3% (95% CI, 34.6% to 68.0%) and 30.2% (95% CI, 13.3% to 47.1%), respectively. Although both regimens were well tolerated, CV-D showed less frequent grade 3-4 neutropenia and vomiting than AC-D, whereas manageable diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome were more common in the CV-D group. Conclusion CV-D is a feasible and active non-anthracycline–based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer
    Siao-Nge Hoon, Peter K H Lau, Alison M White, Max K Bulsara, Patricia D Banks, Andrew D Redfern
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • rApoptin induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells via phosphorylation of Nur77 and Akt
    Zhenhuan Hou, Jun Mao, Ying Lu, Lianhong Li
    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.2018; 498(1): 221.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Challenges and uncertainties
    Mick Van de Wiel, Yanina Dockx, Tim Van den Wyngaert, Sigrid Stroobants, Wiebren A.A. Tjalma, Manon T. Huizing
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2017; 210: 144.     CrossRef
  • Human serum albumin-mediated apoptin delivery suppresses breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo
    Fang Wu, Yizhi Liu, Jian Li, Lei Hou, Fuxi Lei, Shangke Huang, Lu Feng, Xinhan Zhao
    Oncology Letters.2017; 13(2): 579.     CrossRef
  • Capecitabine in Combination with Standard (Neo)Adjuvant Regimens in Early Breast Cancer: Survival Outcome from a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ze-Chun Zhang, Qi-Ni Xu, Sui-Ling Lin, Xu-Yuan Li, Hemant Kumar Bid
    PLOS ONE.2016; 11(10): e0164663.     CrossRef
  • 12,277 View
  • 101 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Single Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia
Dae Kyung Sohn, Seung-Yong Jeong, Hyo Seong Choi, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Myeong Huh, Dae-Hyun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Kyung Hae Jung, Joong-Bae Ahn, Hyun Kyung Kim, Jae-Gahb Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(1):20-23.   Published online February 28, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.1.20
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the validity of a single immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Materials and Methods

A total of 3,794 average-risk screenees and 304 colorectal cancer patients admitted to the National Cancer Center, Korea, between May 2001 and November 2002, were studied prospectively. All screenees and admitted patients underwent FOBT and total colonoscopic examinations. Stools were self-collected, and examined using an immunochemical fecal occult blood test (OC-hemodia®, Eiken Chemical Co. Tokyo, Japan) and an OC-sensor analyzer® (Eiken Chemical Co. Tokyo, Japan).

Results

Of the 3,794 asymptomatic screenees, the colonoscopy identified colorectal adenomas and cancers in 613 (16.2%) and 12 (0.3%) subjects, respectively. The sensitivities of a single immunochemical FOBT for detecting colorectal cancers and adenomas in screenees were 25.0 and 2.4%, respectively. The false positive rate of FOBT for colorectal cancer in screenees was 1.19%. For the total 316 colorectal cancer cases (including 12 cases from screenees), the FOBT sensitivities according to the T-stage were 38.5, 75.0%, 78.9 and 79.2% for T1, 2, 3 and 4 cancers, respectively. The sensitivities according to the Dukes stages A, B and C were 63.4, 79.3 and 78.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

The sensitivities of a single immunochemical FOBT for detecting colorectal cancers and adenomas in screenees were 25.0 and 2.4%, respectively. The sensitivities of FOBT were about 80% for Dukes B or C colorectal cancers and 63.4% for Dukes A.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Interval Advanced Adenomas and Neoplasia in Patients with Negative Colonoscopy Following Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test
    Kyle S. Liu, Rollin George, Caleb Shin, Jia Q. Xiong, Taher Jamali, Yan Liu, Priya Roy, Sonia Singh, Samuel Ma, Hashem B. El-Serag, Mimi C. Tan
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2025; 70(1): 350.     CrossRef
  • Findings in the distal and proximal colon in colonoscopy screening after positive FIT and related pre-procedure factors
    M.� Henar Núñez Rodríguez, Pilar Díez Redondo, Fausto Riu Pons, Marta Cimavilla, Andrea Loza, Manuel Perez-Miranda
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals
    Esmée J Grobbee, Pieter HA Wisse, Eline H Schreuders, Aafke van Roon, Leonie van Dam, Ann G Zauber, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Wichor Bramer, Sarah Berhane, Jonathan J Deeks, Ewout W Steyerberg, Monique E van Leerdam, Manon CW Spaander, Ernst J Kuipers
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
    Mohammad Yaghoobi, Parsa Mehraban Far, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Yuhong Yuan, David Armstrong, Lehana Thabane, Paul Moayyedi
    Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases.2022; 14(4): 382.     CrossRef
  • Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology
    Rumi Shin, Seongdae Lee, Kyung-Su Han, Dae Kyung Sohn, Sang Hui Moon, Dong Hyun Choi, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hae-Jung Son, Sun Il Lee, Sumin Si, Won-Kyung Kang
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 100(3): 154.     CrossRef
  • Screening for Colorectal Cancer
    Jennifer S. Lin, Leslie A. Perdue, Nora B. Henrikson, Sarah I. Bean, Paula R. Blasi
    JAMA.2021; 325(19): 1978.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes of 2412 Prostate Cancer Patients Considered for Carbon Ion Radiotherapy
    Nao Kobayashi, Takahiro Oike, Nobuteru Kubo, Yuhei Miyasaka, Tatsuji Mizukami, Hiro Sato, Akiko Adachi, Hiroyuki Katoh, Hidemasa Kawamura, Tatsuya Ohno
    Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4481.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the Cut-Off Value of Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening during Health Checkups
    Hye-Ran Park, Eun-Hee Nah, Jong-Seon Lee, Seon Cho
    Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance.2021; 43(4): 190.     CrossRef
  • Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tobias Niedermaier, Yesilda Balavarca, Hermann Brenner
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 115(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Detection Differs According to Stage and Location
    Tobias Niedermaier, Kaja Tikk, Anton Gies, Stefanie Bieck, Hermann Brenner
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 18(13): 2920.     CrossRef
  • Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
    Thomas F. Imperiale, Rachel N. Gruber, Timothy E. Stump, Thomas W. Emmett, Patrick O. Monahan
    Annals of Internal Medicine.2019; 170(5): 319.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kevin Selby, Emma H. Levine, Cecilia Doan, Anton Gies, Hermann Brenner, Charles Quesenberry, Jeffrey K. Lee, Douglas A. Corley
    Gastroenterology.2019; 157(6): 1494.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening
    Anton Gies, Megha Bhardwaj, Christian Stock, Petra Schrotz‐King, Hermann Brenner
    International Journal of Cancer.2018; 143(2): 234.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus
    M García-Carrasco, C Mendoza-Pinto, M A Autrán-Limón, E Herrera Robles, S Méndez Martínez, I Etchegaray Morales, Á Montiel Jarquín, J L Gálvez Romero, P Soto-Santillán, J Galindo-Herrera, A López-Colombo
    Lupus.2018; 27(5): 788.     CrossRef
  • Quality Metrics of a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea
    Dae Ho Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Young-Hak Cho, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee
    Gut and Liver.2018; 12(2): 183.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
    Douglas J. Robertson, Jeffrey K. Lee, C. Richard Boland, Jason A. Dominitz, Francis M. Giardiello, David A. Johnson, Tonya Kaltenbach, David Lieberman, Theodore R. Levin, Douglas K. Rex
    Gastroenterology.2017; 152(5): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer
    Douglas J. Robertson, Jeffrey K. Lee, C. Richard Boland, Jason A. Dominitz, Francis M. Giardiello, David A. Johnson, Tonya Kaltenbach, David Lieberman, Theodore R. Levin, Douglas K. Rex
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2017; 85(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
    Douglas J Robertson, Jeffrey K Lee, Richard C Boland, Jason A Dominitz, Francis M Giardiello, David A Johnson, Tonya Kaltenbach, David Lieberman, Theodore R Levin, Douglas K Rex
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 112(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Nam Hee Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn, Kyuyong Choi, Yoon Suk Jung
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(2): 151.     CrossRef
  • Which Fecal Immunochemical Test Should I Choose?
    Jeanette M. Daly, Yinghui Xu, Barcey T. Levy
    Journal of Primary Care & Community Health.2017; 8(4): 264.     CrossRef
  • Cancer-Type Oatp1B3 mRNA Has the Potential to Become a Detection and Prognostic Biomarker for Human Colorectal Cancer
    Yuchen Sun, Manami Harada, Osamu Shimozato, Hiroaki Souda, Nobuhiro Takiguchi, Yoshihiro Nabeya, Takehiko Kamijo, Hidetaka Akita, Naohiko Anzai, Kan Chiba, Tomomi Furihata
    Biomarkers in Medicine.2017; 11(8): 629.     CrossRef
  • Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future
    Marcello Maida, Fabio Salvatore Macaluso, Gianluca Ianiro, Francesca Mangiola, Emanuele Sinagra, Georgina Hold, Carlo Maida, Giovanni Cammarota, Antonio Gasbarrini, Giuseppe Scarpulla
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2017; 17(12): 1131.     CrossRef
  • Age-adapted Variation in Screening Interval of Fecal Immunochemical Test May Improve its Participation and Colonoscopy Acceptance
    Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha, Jin Young Yoon, Jung Won Jeon, Hyun Phil Shin, Kwang Ro Joo, Joung Il Lee
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2017; 51(9): 825.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer
    Jeffrey K. Lee, Elizabeth G. Liles, Stephen Bent, Theodore R. Levin, Douglas A. Corley
    Annals of Internal Medicine.2014; 160(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Use of a Low Cut-Off Value for the Fecal Immunochemical Test Enables Better Detection of Proximal Neoplasia
    Jae Myung Cha, Joung Il Lee, Kwang Ro Joo, Hyun Phil Shin, Jung Won Jeun, Jun Uk Lim
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2013; 58(11): 3256.     CrossRef
  • Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test Is Not Decreased by High Ambient Temperature in the Rapid Return System
    Jae Myung Cha, Joung Il Lee, Kwang Ro Joo, Hyun Phil Shin, Jae Jun Park, Jung Won Jeun, Jun Uk Lim, Sang-Hyun Hwang
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2012; 57(8): 2178.     CrossRef
  • A comparison of qualitative and quantitative fecal immunochemical tests in the Korean national colorectal cancer screening program
    Mi Jin Park, Kui Son Choi, You Kyoung Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Hoo-Yeon Lee
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2012; 47(4): 461.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Features of Colorectal Cancer Detected by the National Cancer Screening Program
    Dae-Do Park, Rumi Shin, Ji-Sun Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Jae-Gahb Park
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2010; 26(6): 420.     CrossRef
  • The Significance of Fecal Immunochemical Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer in National Cancer Screening Program
    Jun Uk Lim, Na Young Bae, Won Koung Song, Jae Myung Cha, Joung Il Lee
    Intestinal Research.2010; 8(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • False negative fecal occult blood tests due to delayed sample return in colorectal cancer screening
    Leo G.M. van Rossum, Anne F. van Rijn, Martijn G.H. van Oijen, Paul Fockens, Robert J.F. Laheij, Andre L.M. Verbeek, Jan B.M.J. Jansen, Evelien Dekker
    International Journal of Cancer.2009; 125(4): 746.     CrossRef
  • Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme
    L G M van Rossum, A F van Rijn, R J F Laheij, M G H van Oijen, P Fockens, J B M J Jansen, A L M Verbeek, E Dekker
    British Journal of Cancer.2009; 101(8): 1274.     CrossRef
  • Random Comparison of Guaiac and Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Population
    Leo G. van Rossum, Anne F. van Rijn, Robert J. Laheij, Martijn G. van Oijen, Paul Fockens, Han H. van Krieken, Andre L. Verbeek, Jan B. Jansen, Evelien Dekker
    Gastroenterology.2008; 135(1): 82.     CrossRef
  • 11,142 View
  • 89 Download
  • 32 Crossref
Close layer
Clinicopathologic Comparison of Intermediate or High Grade Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma with Diffuse B-Cell Lymphoma
Kyung Hae Jung, In Sook Woo, Heung Moon Chang, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Chul Woo Kim, Seonyang Park, Byoung Kook Kim, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1997;29(1):136-145.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) derived from mature T cells forms morphologically diverse group of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and the clinicopathologic features remain to be debated. In order to elucidate the specific characteristics of PTCL, comparison with a group of diffuse B-cell lymphomas (DBCL) was done.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between Dec. 1989 and Feb. 1993, clinical data of 67 cases of intermediate or high grade NHL identified as T-cell or B-cell origin by immunophenotyping was reviewed.
RESULTS
There were 30 cases of PTCL and 37 cases of DBCL. PTCL had more advanced stage and B symptoms at diagnosis. Frequent sites of extranodal involvement were bone marrow, nasal cavity/paranasal sinus, and skin in PTCL and gastrointestinal tract in DBCL. Based on NCI Working Formulation, 40% of PTCL and 14% of DBCL were high grade. Patients with DBCL had a better 3-year overall survival rate (67% vs 47%), however, there was no difference in complete remission rate and disease-free survival rate between two groups with intensive treatment. A subgroup of PTCL patients who had died earlier was found to have more advanced stage and poor performance status.
CONCLUSION
Although patients with PTCL had worse survival in advanced stage, the outcome of patients with PTCL who received intensive treatment was comparable to that of DBCL.
  • 2,494 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer
Chemotherapy of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Etoposide, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin (VIP)
Won Seog Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Hyun Ah Kim, Sung Hyun Yang, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1997;29(1):128-135.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Soft tissue sarcomas are uncommon primary malignancies. So studies on the effective chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas are limited. We started this study to evaluate the effectiveness of VIP (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin) combination chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty patients with recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma were treated with VIP combination chemotherapy between December 1989 and June 1996. Each patient was given etoposide 75 mg/m2, ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously for five consecutive days every three weeks. Mesna (sodium-2-mercaptoethansulfonate) was given to avoid the urologic toxicity.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight of 30 patients were evaluable for response, and among the 28 evaluable patients, there were 9 partial response (32%). Duration of response in 9 responders ranged from 4.1 to 16.2 months (median 8.8 months). Overall survival ranged from 1.7 to 41.5 months (median 11 months) and survival was better for patients with partial response (median survival 14.8 months vs. 9.7 months with stable disease vs. 5.1 months with progressive disease p=0.0006). Nausea and vomiting was noted in more than 90% of cycles, but was markedly severe in only 4%. Leukopenia was noted in 60% of cycles, including 11% of cycles with counts <2,000/mm3. There was no treatment related death, but we had to stop chemotherapy in 2 patients due to leukopenia (1 patient) and neurotoxicity (1 patient).
CONCLUSION
Combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin was fairly active for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with myelosuppresion and peripheral neuropathy being the most serious toxicities.
  • 3,633 View
  • 39 Download
Close layer
Phase II trial of VP-16 plus cisplatin for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Young Iee Park, Tae Yoo Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung Hyun Yang, Jung Ae Lee, Dae Suk Huh, Young Joo Bang, No Kyung Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1993;25(4):539-547.
AbstractAbstract PDF
No abstract available.
  • 2,814 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer
Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone(C-MOPP) in Hodgkin's disease
Kyung Hae Jung, Dong Bok Shin, Hyun Ah Kim, Young Iee Park, Tae You Kim, Keun Chil Park, Yoon Koo Kang, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1991;23(4):806-813.
AbstractAbstract PDF
No abstract available.
  • 2,544 View
  • 24 Download
Close layer
5-fluorouracil and cisplatin(FP) combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients treated previously with chemotherapy
Heung Tae Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Won Ki Kang, Young Suk Park, Chang In Suh, Young Hyunk Im, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1991;23(2):279-290.
AbstractAbstract PDF
No abstract available.
  • 2,626 View
  • 14 Download
Close layer
Cyclophosphamide , Adriamycin and Cisplatin ( CAP ) Combination Chemotherapy for Invasive Thymoma
Young Suk Park, Young Hyuk Im, Won Ki Kang, Chang In Suh, Kee Hyung Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Heung Tae Kim, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1990;22(3):532-539.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Between October 1985 and January 1990, the combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatin (CAP) has been administered in 16 patients with invasive, recurrent or metastatic thymoma. Among 14 evaluable patients, 1 patient(7%) achieved a complete response and 4 patients (29%) had a partial response. The 4 year overall survival rates were 56.7% with a median follow-up of 11.5 months. The mast frequent hematologic toxicity was leukopenia (15.9%) and nonhematologic toxicity (WHO criteria; grade II) were alopecia (80%) and nausea/vomiting (66.7%). The CAP regimen is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of invasive thymoma, and further study is needed to confirm the relative effectiveness of CAP regimen in comparison with other regimens and to find out the prognostic factors related to response rate and survival
  • 3,363 View
  • 38 Download
Close layer
5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin ( FP ) Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer
In Sook Woo, Kyung Hae Jung, Young Iee Park, Jung Ae Rhee, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1996;28(5):835-842.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Esophageal Carcinoma is widely disseminated in many patients at the time of diagnosis. Therefore systemic chemotherapy has assumed an important role in the treatment of this disease. We conducted a phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in 39 patients with advanced esophageal cancer. The regimen consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 1,000 mg/§³/day in 12 hour continuous infusion on day 1 to 5 and cisplatin, 60 mg/§³/day iv on day 1 every three weeks. Response rates were calculated only from 37 patients with measurable disease. The response rate was 39%(complete response 2%, partial response 37%) with a median duration of 4 months (range 2~10 months). Median time of survival for all patients was 9 months(range 1~4 months). The toxicities were moderate. This study demonstrates that combination of 5-fluoriuracil and cisplatin is an efficient and tolerable chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.
  • 6,886 View
  • 112 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP