Purpose
We investigated the impact of four types of antihypertensive medications, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta blockers (BBs; both selective and non-selective), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and thiazide diuretics (TDs) on survival outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
Materials and Methods
A single-institutional retrospective chart review of 878 patients with EOC was performed. Survival was compared according to use of the four antihypertensive medications during primary treatment. Propensity score matching (ratio 1:3) was performed to control possible associated covariates, such as age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, residual status after primary debulking surgery, and co-morbidity.
Results
Among 878 patients, 56 patients (6.4%) were ARB users, 62 (7.1%) were BB users, 107 (12.2%) were CCBs users and 32 (3.6%) used TDs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for ARB, BB, and CCB users was 37.8, 27.2, and 23.6 months compared with 33.6 months for non-users. ARB was associated with 35% decreased risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.99; p=0.046) in multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching, median PFS for ARB users was 37.8 months and ARB use remained to be associated with lower recurrence rate in univariate (p=0.035) and multivariate analysis (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.93; p=0.022).
Conclusion
In this study, ARBs use during primary treatment is associated with lower recurrence in EOC patients. However, CCBs, BBs, and TDs did not show beneficial impact.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Evaluation of antihypertensive medications use and survival in patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study Rūta Everatt, Irena Kuzmickienė, Birutė Brasiūnienė, Ieva Vincerževskienė, Birutė Intaitė, Saulius Cicėnas, Ingrida Lisauskienė BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Advanced progress of the relationship between renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors and cancers Ruixing Zhang, Hongtao Yin, Mengdi Yang, Jinjin Liu, Donghu Zhen, Zheng Zhang Journal of Hypertension.2024; 42(11): 1862. CrossRef
Impact of ACEI/ARB use on the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer: A meta‑analysis Yao Xiao, Xinlong Chen, Wancheng Li, Xin Li, Wence Zhou Oncology Letters.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Development of Gynecologic Cancers: A 23 Million Individual Population-Based Study Nhi Thi Hong Nguyen, Phung-Anh Nguyen, Chih-Wei Huang, Ching-Huan Wang, Ming-Chin Lin, Min-Huei Hsu, Hoang Bui Bao, Shuo-Chen Chien, Hsuan-Chia Yang International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(4): 3814. CrossRef
Association of Hypertension and Breast Cancer: Antihypertensive Drugs as an Effective Adjunctive in Breast Cancer Therapy Yuanyuan Fan, Nazeer Hussain Khan, Muhammad Farhan Ali Khan, MD Faysal Ahammad, Tayyaba Zulfiqar, Razia Virk, Enshe Jiang Cancer Management and Research.2022; Volume 14: 1323. CrossRef
The effect of angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on progression of gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis Seyed Ali Mehrdad, Farshad Mirzavi, Seyed Mohammad Reza Seyedi, Ahmad Asoodeh Anti-Cancer Drugs.2022; 33(10): 983. CrossRef
Repurposing approved drugs for cancer therapy Catherine H Schein British Medical Bulletin.2021; 137(1): 13. CrossRef
Norepinephrine inhibits migration and invasion of human glioblastoma cell cultures possibly via MMP-11 inhibition Jing Zhong, Weiran Shan, Zhiyi Zuo Brain Research.2021; 1756: 147280. CrossRef
Antihypertensive Drug Use and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Death among Finnish Ovarian Cancer Patients—A Nationwide Cohort Study Eerik E. E. Santala, Miia Artama, Eero Pukkala, Kala Visvanathan, Synnöve Staff, Teemu J. Murtola Cancers.2021; 13(9): 2087. CrossRef
The Use of Antihypertensive Drugs as Coadjuvant Therapy in Cancer José A. Carlos-Escalante, Marcela de Jesús-Sánchez, Alejandro Rivas-Castro, Pavel S. Pichardo-Rojas, Claudia Arce, Talia Wegman-Ostrosky Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Post-Diagnostic Beta Blocker Use and Prognosis of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 11 Cohort Studies With 20,274 Patients Zhao-Yan Wen, Song Gao, Ting-Ting Gong, Yu-Ting Jiang, Jia-Yu Zhang, Yu-Hong Zhao, Qi-Jun Wu Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Stress Hormones: Emerging Targets in Gynecological Cancers Guoqiang Chen, Lei Qiu, Jinghai Gao, Jing Wang, Jianhong Dang, Lingling Li, Zhijun Jin, Xiaojun Liu Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of Local Renin Angiotensin System in the Common Types of Cancer Moudhi Almutlaq, Abir Abdullah Alamro, Hassan S. Alamri, Amani Ahmed Alghamdi, Tlili Barhoumi Frontiers in Endocrinology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Does sympathetic nervous system modulate tumor progression? A narrative review of the literature Ioannis Stavropoulos, Angelos Sarantopoulos, Anastasios Liverezas Journal of Drug Assessment.2020; 9(1): 106. CrossRef
Soo Young Jeong, Hyea Park, Myeong Seon Kim, Jun Hyeok Kang, E Sun Paik, Yoo-Young Lee, Tae Joong Kim, Jeong Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk Soo Bae, Chel Hun Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):516-523. Published online October 29, 2019
Purpose
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status.
Materials and Methods
Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion).
Results
A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage.
Conclusion
In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer due to oxidative stress Amir Asotić, Memić Asotić, Muhamed Memić, Kerim Asotić, Amra Asotić Sanamed.2024; 19(1): 39. CrossRef
Investigating and Analyzing Prognostic Factors and Their Impact on Recurrent Cervical Cancers Ashish Uke, Shweta B Dahake, Anurag Luharia, Monika Luharia, Gaurav V Mishra, Chanrashekhar Mahakalkar Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Based on 3D-PDU and clinical characteristics nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis and lymph-vascular space invasion of early cervical cancer preoperatively Shuang Dong, Yan-Qing Peng, Ya-Nan Feng, Xiao-Ying Li, Li-Ping Gong, Shuang Zhang, Xiao-Shan Du, Li-Tao Sun BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Giuseppe Angelico, Damiano Arciuolo, Emma Bragantini, Antonio Travaglino, Michele Valente, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Giulia Scaglione, Stefania Sfregola, Alessia Piermattei, Federica Cianfrini, Paola Roberti, Gian Franco Za Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1137. CrossRef
Identification of lymph node metastasis in pre‐operation cervical cancer patients by weakly supervised deep learning from histopathological whole‐slide biopsy images Qingqing Liu, Nan Jiang, Yiping Hao, Chunyan Hao, Wei Wang, Tingting Bian, Xiaohong Wang, Hua Li, Yan zhang, Yanjun Kang, Fengxiang Xie, Yawen Li, XuJi Jiang, Yuan Feng, Zhonghao Mao, Qi Wang, Qun Gao, Wenjing Zhang, Baoxia Cui, Taotao Dong Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(17): 17952. CrossRef
Roles of DWI and T2-weighted MRI volumetry in the evaluation of lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion of stage IB–IIA cervical cancer Y. Wang, X. Chen, H. Pu, Y. Yuan, S. Li, G. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Li Clinical Radiology.2022; 77(3): 224. CrossRef
Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Mu Xu, Xiaoyan Xie, Liangzhi Cai, Yongjin Xie, Qiao Gao, Pengming Sun Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Miriam Dolciami, Silvia Capuani, Veronica Celli, Alessandra Maiuro, Angelina Pernazza, Innocenza Palaia, Violante Di Donato, Giusi Santangelo, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Paolo Ricci, Carlo Della Rocca, Carlo Catalano, Lucia Manganaro Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 638. CrossRef
The prognostic significance of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy and a comparison of dosimetric outcomes and clinical toxicities between tomotherapy and volumetric Yuan-Kai Cheng, Shih-Hsun Kuo, Heng-Hsuan Yen, Jing-Hu Wu, Yu-Chieh Chen, Ming-Yii Huang Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
What MRI-based tumor size measurement is best for predicting long-term survival in uterine cervical cancer? Njål Lura, Kari S. Wagner-Larsen, David Forsse, Jone Trovik, Mari K. Halle, Bjørn I. Bertelsen, Øyvind Salvesen, Kathrine Woie, Camilla Krakstad, Ingfrid S. Haldorsen Insights into Imaging.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical value of MRI, serum SCCA, and CA125 levels in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and para-uterine infiltration in cervical cancer Chao Ran, Jian Sun, Yunhui Qu, Na Long World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Novel Four-Gene Prognostic Signature as a Risk Biomarker in Cervical Cancer Jun Wang, Hua Zheng, Yatian Han, Geng Wang, Yanbin Li, Cuida Meng International Journal of Genomics.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef