Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Joo Seop Chung"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
In Hae Park, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Sung Bae Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Joo Seop Chung, Soo Hyeon Lee, Tae You Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Eun Kyung Cho, Yang Soo Kim, Hong Suk Song, Jae Hong Seo, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sun Ah Lee, So Young Yoon, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Kim, Mi Ryung Jin, Jungsil Ro
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):569-577.   Published online September 12, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol).
Materials and Methods
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).
Results
The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m2 (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m2 (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (pnon-inferiority=0.021, psuperiority=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments.
Conclusion
Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Revolutionizing cancer treatment: ROS-induced apoptosis via nanoformulated alkaloids
    Swathi Putta, Santhosh Kumar Chinnaiyan, Ramadevi Korni, Venkata Radha Gadela
    Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.2025; 104: 106556.     CrossRef
  • A drug-eluting balloon catheter coated with chitosan and paclitaxel-loaded poloxamer-stabilized PLA microparticles for the effective treatment of cholangiocarcinoma
    Jin Sil Lee, Jaehee Jang, Hyeryeon Oh, Eunhye Lee, Don Haeng Lee, Panmo Son, Daekyung Sung, Won Il Choi
    Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanomicellar Prodrug Delivery of Glucose-Paclitaxel: A Strategy to Mitigate Paclitaxel Toxicity
    Didi Yan, Xinyue Ma, Yixin Hu, Guogang Zhang, Beibei Hu, Bo Xiang, Xiaokun Cheng, Yongshuai Jing, Xi Chen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2025; Volume 20: 2087.     CrossRef
  • Administration of Inhibitory Molecules through Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Therapy
    Christian Rafael Quijia, Andreina Quevedo Enríquez, Carlos Daniel Zappia, Roxana Noemí Peroni, Marlus Chorilli
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 31(6): 726.     CrossRef
  • Innovative strategies for effective paclitaxel delivery: Recent developments and prospects
    Sławomir Wileński, Agnieszka Koper, Paulina Śledzińska, Marek Bebyn, Krzysztof Koper
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2024; 30(2): 367.     CrossRef
  • Effect of zwitterionic sulfobetaine incorporation on blood behaviours, phagocytosis, and in vivo biodistribution of pH-responsive micelles with positive charges
    Chengwei Wang, Hao Liu, Hu Lin, Rui Zhong, Hao Li, Jiaxin Liu, Xianglin Luo, Meng Tian
    Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2024; 12(6): 1652.     CrossRef
  • Reexamining in vivo fate of paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelles
    Shiqi Lin, Yifei Yu, Ercan Wu, Tianhao Ding, Yuxiu Chu, Feng Pan, Yang Yang, Changyou Zhan
    Nano Today.2024; 56: 102255.     CrossRef
  • Functionalized Polymeric Micelles for Targeted Cancer Therapy: Steps from Conceptualization to Clinical Trials
    Ana Serras, Célia Faustino, Lídia Pinheiro
    Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(8): 1047.     CrossRef
  • Polyester nanoparticles delivering chemotherapeutics: Learning from the past and looking to the future to enhance their clinical impact in tumor therapy
    Giuseppe Longobardi, Thomas Lee Moore, Claudia Conte, Francesca Ungaro, Ronit Satchi‐Fainaro, Fabiana Quaglia
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research progress of paclitaxel nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
    Jia-xin Qiao, Dong-yan Guo, Huan Tian, Zhan-peng Wang, Qiang-qiang Fan, Yuan Tian, Jing Sun, Xiao-fei Zhang, Jun-bo Zou, Jiang-xue Cheng, Fei Luan, Bing-tao Zhai
    Materials Today Bio.2024; 29: 101358.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology in cancer therapeutics, diagnosis, and management
    Disha Hazarika, Sumit Sarma, Priyanka Shankarishan
    BioTechnologia.2024; 105(3): 287.     CrossRef
  • Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis of Porous Biomolecule‐Incorporated Metal‐Organic Frameworks as Efficient Nanocarriers for Anti‐Cancer Drugs
    Trang Thi Thu Nguyen, Bao Quang Gia Le, Vy Tran Hanh Nguyen, Jae‐Hyoung Lee, Ngoc Xuan Dat Mai, Linh Ho Thuy Nguyen, Tan Le Hoang Doan
    ChemistrySelect.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Innovative nanotheranostics: Smart nanoparticles based approach to overcome breast cancer stem cells mediated chemo‐ and radioresistances
    Prithwish Kola, Prasanth Kumar Bhusetty Nagesh, Pritam Kumar Roy, K. Deepak, Rui Luis Reis, Subhas C. Kundu, Mahitosh Mandal
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer metastases: Current and future perspectives
    Mangala Hegde, Nikunj Naliyadhara, Jyothsna Unnikrishnan, Mohammed S. Alqahtani, Mohamed Abbas, Sosmitha Girisa, Gautam Sethi, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara
    Cancer Letters.2023; 556: 216066.     CrossRef
  • Influence of lung cancer model characteristics on tumor targeting behavior of nanodrugs
    Weixia Xu, Shengmin Yang, Linwei Lu, Qianzhu Xu, Sunyi Wu, Jianfen Zhou, Jiashen Lu, Xingyan Fan, Nana Meng, Yuan Ding, Xudong Zheng, Weiyue Lu
    Journal of Controlled Release.2023; 354: 538.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Breast Cancer: Review of Emerging Nanotherapeutics
    Ranga Dissanayake, Rheal Towner, Marya Ahmed
    Cancers.2023; 15(11): 2906.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Nanopaclitaxel Formulation for Cancer Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials
    Xiangmin Deng, Xiaoqin Huang, Xiaoyan Dong, Genxiang Mao, Wenmin Xing
    Nanomedicine.2023; 18(10): 833.     CrossRef
  • Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer
    João P. N. Silva, Bárbara Pinto, Luís Monteiro, Patrícia M. A. Silva, Hassan Bousbaa
    Pharmaceutics.2023; 15(6): 1653.     CrossRef
  • Nano delivery system for paclitaxel: Recent advances in cancer theranostics
    Na Ying, Sisi Liu, Mengmeng Zhang, Jing Cheng, Linghuan Luo, Jiayi Jiang, Gaofan Shi, Shu Wu, Jun Ji, Haoyuan Su, Hongzhi Pan, Dongdong Zeng
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2023; 228: 113419.     CrossRef
  • Current Perspectives on Paclitaxel: Focus on Its Production, Delivery and Combination Therapy
    Yibin Liu, Fenglan Zhao, Qibao Wang, Qingjie Zhao, Guige Hou, Qingguo Meng
    Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.2023; 23(18): 1780.     CrossRef
  • Current perspectives and trends in nanoparticle drug delivery systems in breast cancer: bibliometric analysis and review
    Sheng Sun, Ye-hui Wang, Xiang Gao, He-yong Wang, Lu Zhang, Na Wang, Chun-mei Li, Shao-quan Xiong
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Paclitaxel prodrug-encapsulated polypeptide micelles with redox/pH dual responsiveness for cancer chemotherapy
    Jinyu Liu, Yanhao Zhang, Chao Liu, Yuhao Jiang, Zihao Wang, Xinsong Li
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2023; 645: 123398.     CrossRef
  • Biodegradable polyester-based nano drug delivery system in cancer chemotherapy: a review of recent progress (2021–2023)
    Zongheng Wang, Miaomiao Xiao, Fangliang Guo, Yue Yan, Hong Tian, Qianshi Zhang, Shuangyi Ren, Liqun Yang
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of triblock copolymeric micelles based on α- and ε-poly(L-lysine): a Cornelian choice
    Franck Marquet, Viorica Patrulea, Gerrit Borchard
    Polymer Journal.2022; 54(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Current understandings and clinical translation of nanomedicines for breast cancer therapy
    Yike Jiang, Ziyi Jiang, Mingzhe Wang, Lan Ma
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 180: 114034.     CrossRef
  • Poly(ϵ-Caprolactone)-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol (PCL-MPEG)-Based Micelles for Drug-Delivery: The Effect of PCL Chain Length on Blood Components, Phagocytosis, and Biodistribution
    Zemin Hou, Wencheng Zhou, Xi Guo, Rui Zhong, Ao Wang, Jiehua Li, Ying Cen, Chao You, Hong Tan, Meng Tian
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2022; Volume 17: 1613.     CrossRef
  • Engineered nanomaterials as an effective tool for HER2+ breast cancer therapy
    Prashant Pandey, Dilip Kumar Arya, Mohan Kumar Ramar, Kumarappan Chidambaram, P.S. Rajinikanth
    Drug Discovery Today.2022; 27(9): 2526.     CrossRef
  • Biophysical Characterization of Interactions between Serum Albumin and Block Copolymer Micelles
    Catherine F. Dial, Richard A. Gemeinhart
    ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.2022; 8(7): 2899.     CrossRef
  • Micelles in Cancer Therapy: An Update on Preclinical and Clinical Status
    Rabia Aqeel, Nidhi Srivastava, Poonam Kushwaha
    Recent Patents on Nanotechnology.2022; 16(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Challenging the fundamental conjectures in nanoparticle drug delivery for chemotherapy treatment of solid cancers
    Juanjuan Yang, Xiaojin Wang, Bingshun Wang, Kinam Park, Karen Wooley, Shiyi Zhang
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 190: 114525.     CrossRef
  • In Vivo Sustained Release of the Retrograde Transport Inhibitor Retro-2.1 Formulated in a Thermosensitive Hydrogel
    Robin Vinck, Laetitia Anvi Nguyen, Mathilde Munier, Lucie Caramelle, Diana Karpman, Julien Barbier, Alain Pruvost, Jean-Christophe Cintrat, Daniel Gillet
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(23): 14611.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Translation of Self‐Assembled Cancer Nanomedicines
    Peng Mi, Kanjiro Miyata, Kazunori Kataoka, Horacio Cabral
    Advanced Therapeutics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From Conventional to Precision Therapy in Canine Mammary Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Guillermo Valdivia, Ángela Alonso-Diez, Dolores Pérez-Alenza, Laura Peña
    Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced Biotechnologies: Collections of Plant Cell Cultures As a Basis for Development and Production of Medicinal Preparations
    E. V. Popova, A. V. Nosov, M. V. Titova, D. V. Kochkin, A. A. Fomenkov, I. E. Kulichenko, A. M. Nosov
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.2021; 68(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation
    Xin Luan, Hebao Yuan, Yudong Song, Hongxiang Hu, Bo Wen, Miao He, Huixia Zhang, Yan Li, Feng Li, Pan Shu, Joseph P. Burnett, Nathan Truchan, Maria Palmisano, Manjunath P. Pai, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao, Duxin Sun
    Biomaterials.2021; 275: 120910.     CrossRef
  • Breast cancer: Muscarinic receptors as new targets for tumor therapy
    Alejandro Español, Agustina Salem, Yamila Sanchez, María Elena Sales
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 12(6): 404.     CrossRef
  • Direct Comparison of Analogous Amphiphilic Gradient and Block Polyoxazolines
    Lenka Loukotová, Pavel Švec, Ondřej Groborz, Tomáš Heizer, Hynek Beneš, Helena Raabová, Tereza Bělinová, Vít Herynek, Martin Hrubý
    Macromolecules.2021; 54(17): 8182.     CrossRef
  • Challenges towards Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Nanomedicines
    Muhammad Nadeem Hafeez, Christian Celia, Vilma Petrikaite
    Processes.2021; 9(9): 1527.     CrossRef
  • Drug Delivery of Natural Products Through Nanocarriers for Effective Breast Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Literature
    Kah Min Yap, Mahendran Sekar, Shivkanya Fuloria, Yuan Seng Wu, Siew Hua Gan, Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, Chandrakant Kokare, Pei Teng Lum, M Yasmin Begum, Shankar Mani, Dhanalekshmi Unnikrishnan Meenakshi, Kathiresan V Sathasiva
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2021; Volume 16: 7891.     CrossRef
  • Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study)
    Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Hong Seo, Jin-Hee Ahn, Tae-Yong Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Joohyuk Sohn, Yaewon Yang, Kyong Hwa Park, Yong Wha Moon, Seungtaek Lim, Myoung Joo Kang, Koung Eun Yoon, Hyun Ju Cho, Keun Seok Lee
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Self-assembly of oxidation-responsive polyethylene glycol-paclitaxel prodrug for cancer chemotherapy
    Chengyuan Dong, Quan Zhou, Jiajia Xiang, Fusheng Liu, Zhuxian Zhou, Youqing Shen
    Journal of Controlled Release.2020; 321: 529.     CrossRef
  • Clinical applications of nanomedicine in cancer therapy
    Mohammad Norouzi, Mehrnaz Amerian, Mahshid Amerian, Fatemeh Atyabi
    Drug Discovery Today.2020; 25(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • Improvement of Paclitaxel-Associated Adverse Reactions (ADRs) via the Use of Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis


    Pi-Ling Chou, Ya-Ping Huang, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kun-Ming Rau, Yi-Ping Fang
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 1731.     CrossRef
  • Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Adam S. Komorowski, Helen J. MacKay, Rossanna C. Pezo
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(14): 5035.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges
    Saeid Kargozar, Francesco Baino, Sepideh Hamzehlou, Michael R. Hamblin, Masoud Mozafari
    Chemical Society Reviews.2020; 49(14): 5008.     CrossRef
  • Furry nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization of nanoemulsion-mediated core crosslinked nanoparticles and their robust stability in vivo
    Rena Tanaka, Koichi Arai, Jun Matsuno, Miyo Soejima, Ji Ha Lee, Rintaro Takahashi, Kazuo Sakurai, Shota Fujii
    Polymer Chemistry.2020; 11(27): 4408.     CrossRef
  • Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval
    Duhyeong Hwang, Jacob D. Ramsey, Alexander V. Kabanov
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2020; 156: 80.     CrossRef
  • What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right
    Duxin Sun, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao
    ACS Nano.2020; 14(10): 12281.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis of PCL–PEG–PCL Triblock Copolymer via Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization and Its Application as an Injectable Hydrogel—An Interdisciplinary Learning Trial
    Kaiting Wu, Lin Yu, Jiandong Ding
    Journal of Chemical Education.2020; 97(11): 4158.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical-Based Nanomedicine for Advanced Cancer Theranostics: Perspectives on Clinical Trials to Clinical Use


    Madhusmita Dhupal, Devasish Chowdhury
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 9125.     CrossRef
  • A Compressive Review about Taxol®: History and Future Challenges
    Julia Gallego-Jara, Gema Lozano-Terol, Rosa Alba Sola-Martínez, Manuel Cánovas-Díaz, Teresa de Diego Puente
    Molecules.2020; 25(24): 5986.     CrossRef
  • Recent Clinical Developments of Nanomediated Drug Delivery Systems of Taxanes for the Treatment of Cancer
    Ruben AG van Eerden, Ron HJ Mathijssen, Stijn LW Koolen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 8151.     CrossRef
  • Basic principles of drug delivery systems – the case of paclitaxel
    S. Ezrahi, A. Aserin, N. Garti
    Advances in Colloid and Interface Science.2019; 263: 95.     CrossRef
  • Biomolecules Turn Self-Assembling Amphiphilic Block Co-polymer Platforms Into Biomimetic Interfaces
    Saziye Yorulmaz Avsar, Myrto Kyropoulou, Stefano Di Leone, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Wolfgang P. Meier, Cornelia G. Palivan
    Frontiers in Chemistry.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polyester Nanoparticle Encapsulation Mitigates Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    R. Ganugula, M. Deng, M. Arora, H.-L. Pan, M. N. V. Ravi Kumar
    ACS Chemical Neuroscience.2019; 10(3): 1801.     CrossRef
  • PEGylation of Ginsenoside Rg3-Entrapped Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization, and In Vitro Biological Studies
    Lijun Zhang, Junfeng Hui, Pei Ma, Yu Mi, Daidi Fan, Chenhui Zhu, Lei Chi, Yanan Dong
    Journal of Nanomaterials.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy by formulation approach
    Xiaowei Zang, Jong Bong Lee, Kiran Deshpande, Olga B. Garbuzenko, Tamara Minko, Leonid Kagan
    Journal of Controlled Release.2019; 303: 109.     CrossRef
  • Current status of nanomedicine in the chemotherapy of breast cancer
    A. I. Fraguas-Sánchez, C. Martín-Sabroso, A. Fernández-Carballido, A. I. Torres-Suárez
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2019; 84(4): 689.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Genexol-PM and Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bhumsuk Keam, Keun-Wook Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Keun-Yong Eom, Suzy Kim, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Seong Keun Kwon, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung, Ji-Won Kim, Dae Seog Heo
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • Advances in thermosensitive polymer-grafted platforms for biomedical applications
    Phung Ngan Le, Chan Khon Huynh, Ngoc Quyen Tran
    Materials Science and Engineering: C.2018; 92: 1016.     CrossRef
  • Supramolecular polymeric chemotherapy based on cucurbit[7]uril-PEG copolymer
    Hao Chen, Yueyue Chen, Han Wu, Jiang-Fei Xu, Zhiwei Sun, Xi Zhang
    Biomaterials.2018; 178: 697.     CrossRef
  • pH/NIR-Responsive Polypyrrole-Functionalized Fibrous Localized Drug-Delivery Platform for Synergistic Cancer Therapy
    Arjun Prasad Tiwari, Tae In Hwang, Jung-Mi Oh, Bikendra Maharjan, Sungkun Chun, Beom Su Kim, Mahesh Kumar Joshi, Chan Hee Park, Cheol Sang Kim
    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2018; 10(24): 20256.     CrossRef
  • The Blood Clearance Kinetics and Pathway of Polymeric Micelles in Cancer Drug Delivery
    Xuanrong Sun, Guowei Wang, Hao Zhang, Shiqi Hu, Xin Liu, Jianbin Tang, Youqing Shen
    ACS Nano.2018; 12(6): 6179.     CrossRef
  • Different Nanoformulations Alter the Tissue Distribution of Paclitaxel, Which Aligns with Reported Distinct Efficacy and Safety Profiles
    Feng Li, Huixia Zhang, Miao He, Jinhui Liao, Nianhang Chen, Yan Li, Simon Zhou, Maria Palmisano, Alex Yu, Manjunath P. Pai, Hebao Yuan, Duxin Sun
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2018; 15(10): 4505.     CrossRef
  • Emerging advances in P-glycoprotein inhibitory nanomaterials for drug delivery
    Longfa Kou, Rui Sun, Yangzom D. Bhutia, Qing Yao, Ruijie Chen
    Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery.2018; 15(9): 869.     CrossRef
  • The battle of “nano” paclitaxel
    Alexandros Marios Sofias, Michael Dunne, Gert Storm, Christine Allen
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overcoming the Road Blocks: Advancement of Block Copolymer Micelles for Cancer Therapy in the Clinic
    Loujin Houdaihed, James C. Evans, Christine Allen
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2017; 14(8): 2503.     CrossRef
  • PEG-PCL-based nanomedicines: A biodegradable drug delivery system and its application
    Philip Grossen, Dominik Witzigmann, Sandro Sieber, Jörg Huwyler
    Journal of Controlled Release.2017; 260: 46.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thermoresponsive Poly(L-lactic acid)–poly(ethylene glycol) Gel Injection on Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Rat Myocardial Infarction Model
    Shota Somekawa, Atsushi Mahara, Kazunari Masutani, Yoshiharu Kimura, Hiroshi Urakawa, Tetsuji Yamaoka
    Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.2017; 14(5): 507.     CrossRef
  • A versatile nanoplatform for synergistic combination therapy to treat human esophageal cancer
    Xin-shuai Wang, De-jiu Kong, Tzu-yin Lin, Xiao-cen Li, Yoshihiro Izumiya, Xue-zhen Ding, Li Zhang, Xiao-chen Hu, Jun-qiang Yang, She-gan Gao, Kit S Lam, Yuan-pei Li
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.2017; 38(6): 931.     CrossRef
  • 17,667 View
  • 638 Download
  • 74 Web of Science
  • 70 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Usefulness of Hydromorphone-OROS in Improving Sleep Disturbances in Korean Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label Study
Seong Hoon Shin, Ho Sup Lee, Yang Soo Kim, Young Jin Choi, Sung Hyun Kim, Hyuk Chan Kwon, Sung Yong Oh, Jung Hun Kang, Chang Hak Sohn, Sang Min Lee, Jin Ho Baek, Young Joo Min, Choongrak Kim, Joo Seop Chung
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(4):331-338.   Published online July 21, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.130
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of hydromorphone-OROS (HM-OROS) in reducing sleep disturbance and relieving cancer pain. Materials and Methods One hundred twenty cancer patients with pain (numeric rating scale [NRS] ≥ 4) and sleep disturbance (NRS ≥ 4) were evaluated. The initial HM-OROS dosing was based on previous opioid dose (HM-OROS:oral morphine=1:5). Dose adjustment of the study drug was permitted at the investigator’s discretion. Pain intensity, number of breakthrough pain episodes, and quality of sleep were evaluated. Results A total of 120 patients received at least one dose of HM-OROS; 74 of them completed the final assessment. Compared to the previous opioids, HM-OROS reduced the average pain NRS from 5.3 to 4.1 (p < 0.01), worst pain NRS from 6.7 to 5.4 (p < 0.01), sleep disturbance NRS from 5.9 to 4.1 (p < 0.01), incidence of breakthrough pain at night from 2.63 to 1.53 times (p < 0.001), and immediate-release opioids use for the management of breakthrough pain from 0.83 to 0.39 times per night (p = 0.001). Of the 74 patients who completed the treatment, 83.7% indicated that they preferred HM-OROS to the previous medication. The adverse events (AEs) were somnolence, asthenia, constipation, dizziness, and nausea. Conclusion HM-OROS was efficacious in reducing cancer pain and associated sleep disturbances. The AEs were manageable.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Pain and Analgesic Related Insomnia
    Jana Mlíchová, Zoltán Paluch, Ondřej Šimandl
    Pain Management Nursing.2023; 24(3): 254.     CrossRef
  • Initial titration with 200 μg fentanyl buccal tablets: a retrospective safety analysis in Korean cancer patients
    Mi-Young Kwon, Ha-Na Cho, Dong-Hoe Koo, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Sukjoong Oh, Seung-Sei Lee
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2018; 33(3): 577.     CrossRef
  • Endogenous Opiates and Behavior: 2015
    Richard J. Bodnar
    Peptides.2017; 88: 126.     CrossRef
  • Drug Formulation Advances in Extended-Release Medications for Pain Control
    Mark R. Jones, Martin J. Carney, Rachel J. Kaye, Amit Prabhakar, Alan D. Kaye
    Current Pain and Headache Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Applications of Extended-Release Abuse-Deterrent Opioids
    Nalini Vadivelu, Erika Schermer, Gopal Kodumudi, Jack M. Berger
    CNS Drugs.2016; 30(7): 637.     CrossRef
  • Once-Daily OROS Hydromorphone for Management of Cancer Pain: an Open-Label, Multi-Center, Non-Interventional Study
    Cheol Kyu Park, Hyun-Wook Kang, In-Jae Oh, Young-Chul Kim, Yeo-Kyeoung Kim, Kook-Joo Na, Sung-Ja Ahn, Tae Ok Kim, Young Jin Choi, Geun Am Song, Min Ki Lee
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2016; 31(12): 1914.     CrossRef
  • 13,385 View
  • 81 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Heptaplatin 1-hour Infusion and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy Comparing with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Hyung Min Jin, Jinmo Yang, Hong Suk Song, Young Rok Do, Hun Mo Ryoo, Joo Seop Chung, Dae Young Zang, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jong Youl Jin, Chang Yeol Yim, Hee Sook Park, Jun Suk Kim, Chang Hak Sohn, Soon Nam Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41(1):12-18.   Published online March 31, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2009.41.1.12
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

Heptaplatin (Sunpla) is a cisplatin derivative. A phase IIb trial using heptaplatin resulted in a 34% response rate with mild nephrotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase III trial of heptaplatin plus 5-FU compared with cisplatin plus 5-FU in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

One hundred seventy-four patients (heptaplatin, n=88; cisplatin, n=86) from 13 centers were enrolled. The eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with pathologically-proven adenocarcinoma, chemonaive patients, or patients who had received only single adjuvant chemotherapy, and who had a measurable or evaluable lesion. On day 1, heptaplatin (400 mg/m2) or cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given over 1 hour with 5-FU (1 gm/m2) on days 1~5 every 4 weeks.

Results

At the time of survival analysis, the median overall survival was 7.3 months in the 5-FU + heptaplatin (FH) arm and 7.9 months in the 5-FU + cisplatin (FP) arm (p=0.24). Of the FH patients, 34.2% (complete response [CR], 1.3%; partial response [PR], 32.9%) experienced a confirmed objective response compared with 35.9% (CR 0%, PR 35.9%) of FP patients (p=0.78). The median-time-to-progression was 2.5 months in the FH arm and 2.3 months in the FP arm. The incidence of neutropenia was higher with FP (28%) than with FH (16%; p=0.06); grade 3~4 nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the FP than in the FH arm (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). The incidence of increased proteinuria and creatininemia was higher with FH than with FP; however, there was no statistical difference. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Heptaplatin showed similar effects to cisplatin when combined with 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer patients with tolerable toxicities.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group
    Bum Jun Kim, Chi Hoon Maeng, Bhumsuk Keam, Young-Hyuck Im, Jungsil Ro, Kyung Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Tae Won Kim, Jae Lyun Lee, Dae Seog Heo, Sang-We Kim, Keunchil Park, Myung-Ju Ahn, Byoung Chul Cho, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang, Jae Yong Cho, Hwan Jung Yu
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Quantum mechanical approaches and molecular docking analysis of platinum metal-based anticancer drugs Lobaplatin and Heptaplatin targeting cancer DNA - a comparative analysis
    Madhavi Sahadevan, Mullainathan Sundaram, Karunagaran Subramanian
    Chemical Physics Letters.2024; 842: 141191.     CrossRef
  • Cisplatin Resistance in Cancer Therapy: Causes and Overcoming Strategies
    S. Shruthi, K. Bhasker Shenoy
    ChemistrySelect.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances on Pt-Based Compounds for Theranostic Applications
    Giulia Ferrari, Ines Lopez-Martinez, Thomas Wanek, Claudia Kuntner, Diego Montagner
    Molecules.2024; 29(15): 3453.     CrossRef
  • Hallmarks of anticancer and antimicrobial activities of corroles
    Vinay K. Sharma, Yehuda G. Assaraf, Zeev Gross
    Drug Resistance Updates.2023; : 100931.     CrossRef
  • Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases
    Dobrina Tsvetkova, Stefka Ivanova
    Molecules.2022; 27(8): 2466.     CrossRef
  • Second and third-row transition metal compounds containing benzimidazole ligands: An overview of their anticancer and antitumour activity
    Galdina V. Suárez-Moreno, Delia Hernández-Romero, Óscar García-Barradas, Óscar Vázquez-Vera, Sharon Rosete-Luna, Carlos A. Cruz-Cruz, Aracely López-Monteon, Jesús Carrillo-Ahumada, David Morales-Morales, Raúl Colorado-Peralta
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2022; 472: 214790.     CrossRef
  • Metalofármacos en la terapia contra el cáncer
    Elizabeth Márquez López, Esmeralda Sánchez Pavón, Rodolfo Peña Rodríguez, Delia Hernández Romero, José M. Rivera Villanueva, Raúl Colorado Peralta, David Morales Morales
    TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua.2022; 16(3): e1010.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(IV) anticancer agents; are we en route to the holy grail or to a dead end?
    Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2021; 217: 111353.     CrossRef
  • Monofunctional Platinum(II) Anticancer Agents
    Suxing Jin, Yan Guo, Zijian Guo, Xiaoyong Wang
    Pharmaceuticals.2021; 14(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Pt(IV) Prodrugs with NSAIDs as Axial Ligands
    Daniil Spector, Olga Krasnovskaya, Kirill Pavlov, Alexander Erofeev, Peter Gorelkin, Elena Beloglazkina, Alexander Majouga
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(8): 3817.     CrossRef
  • Multi-action Pt(IV) anticancer agents; do we understand how they work?
    Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2019; 191: 77.     CrossRef
  • TOXview: a novel graphical presentation of cancer treatment toxicity profiles
    Lok Lam Ngai, Emil ter Veer, Héctor G. van den Boorn, E. Hugo van Herk, Jessy Joy van Kleef, Martijn G. H. van Oijen, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
    Acta Oncologica.2019; 58(8): 1138.     CrossRef
  • Photoactivated platinum-based anticancer drugs
    Muhammad Imran, Wagma Ayub, Ian S. Butler, Zia-ur-Rehman
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2018; 376: 405.     CrossRef
  • Survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sakura Iizumi, Atsuo Takashima, Kentaro Sakamaki, Satoshi Morita, Narikazu Boku
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2018; 81(6): 981.     CrossRef
  • An Analytics Approach to Designing Combination Chemotherapy Regimens for Cancer
    Dimitris Bertsimas, Allison O’Hair, Stephen Relyea, John Silberholz
    Management Science.2016; 62(5): 1511.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(iv) anticancer prodrugs – hypotheses and facts
    Dan Gibson
    Dalton Transactions.2016; 45(33): 12983.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(II) carboxylato complexes containing 7-azaindoles as N-donor carrier ligands showed cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines
    Pavel Štarha, Zdeněk Trávníček, Lucia Pazderová, Zdeněk Dvořák
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2016; 162: 109.     CrossRef
  • VEGF- and VEGFR2-Targeted Liposomes for Cisplatin Delivery to Glioma Cells
    Sergey A. Shein, Ilya I. Kuznetsov, Tatiana O. Abakumova, Pavel S. Chelushkin, Pavel A. Melnikov, Anna A. Korchagina, Dmitry A. Bychkov, Irina F. Seregina, Mikhail A. Bolshov, Alexander V. Kabanov, Vladimir P. Chekhonin, Natalia V. Nukolova
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2016; 13(11): 3712.     CrossRef
  • Condensations of single DNA molecules induced by heptaplatin and its chiral isomer
    Hong-Yan Zhang, Yu-Ru Liu, Wei Li, Hui Li, Shuo-Xing Dou, Ping Xie, Wei-Chi Wang, Peng-Ye Wang
    AIP Advances.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanocarriers for delivery of platinum anticancer drugs
    Hardeep S. Oberoi, Natalia V. Nukolova, Alexander V. Kabanov, Tatiana K. Bronich
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2013; 65(13-14): 1667.     CrossRef
  • Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials
    Kohei Shitara, Junko Ikeda, Tomoya Yokota, Daisuke Takahari, Takashi Ura, Kei Muro, Keitaro Matsuo
    Investigational New Drugs.2012; 30(3): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Cellular interactions of platinum drugs
    Ezequiel Wexselblatt, Eylon Yavin, Dan Gibson
    Inorganica Chimica Acta.2012; 393: 75.     CrossRef
  • What do we know about the reduction of Pt(IV) pro-drugs?
    Ezequiel Wexselblatt, Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2012; 117: 220.     CrossRef
  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
    X.-L. Zhang, H.-J. Shi, S.-Z. Cui, Y.-Q. Tang, M.-C. Ba
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2011; 37(6): 466.     CrossRef
  • The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials
    Nial J. Wheate, Shonagh Walker, Gemma E. Craig, Rabbab Oun
    Dalton Transactions.2010; 39(35): 8113.     CrossRef
  • 12,196 View
  • 114 Download
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
Docetaxel and Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck
Jung Hyun Lee, Kyung Woo Lee, Young Jin Choi, Jae Hoon Choi, Ho Jin Shin, Joo Seop Chung, Goon Jae Cho, Byung Ju Lee, Soo Geun Wang
Cancer Res Treat. 2003;35(3):261-266.   Published online June 30, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2003.35.3.261
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The objective of this phase II study was to assess the clinical antitumor activity and toxicities of docetaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy, in patients with locally advanced and metastatic, recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All eligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic, recurrent SCCHN had received two courses of chemotherapy followed by repeated head and neck examinations and computed tomography. Patients who had received prior chemotherapy with taxanes were ineligible. If the patients achieved a response (either CR or PR), they received one more course of chemotherapy prior to undergoing definitive local treatment. The combination chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel, 70 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, on day 1, with the cycles repeated every 3~4 weeks. RESULTS: All 32 patients were assessable for response and toxicity analyses. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 11% of cases. No febrile neutropenia was noticed. The other grade 3/4 adverse events included: anemia (2%) and stomatitis (3%). The response rate in patients with locally advanced cancer was 19/21 (90%). Fifteen patients (71%) achieved a CR and 4 (19%) a PR. Out of the 4 patients presenting with a distant metastatic disease, 1 each achieved CR and PR, with 2 stable disease (SD). Out of the 7 patients with a recurrence at a distant site, 1 each achieved PR and SD, and 5 (71%) had a progression of the disease (PD). The overall response rate was 22/32 (69%).
CONCLUSION
Docetaxel plus cisplatin is an effective regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile. This regimen may offer high antitumor activity on short outpatient administration, with a low incidence of severe toxicity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Analysis of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel and Platinum in Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Jongseung Kim, Kyengsuk Lee, Byungeon Hwang, Sangho Lim, Sunho Ryu, Ilwoo Ha, Eun Jung Lee, Kihwan Hong, Yunsu Yang
    Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.2010; 53(11): 706.     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy of an Induction Chemotherapy Combination with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-FU Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
    Jae-Sook Ahn, Sang-Hee Cho, Ok-Ki Kim, Joon-Kyoo Lee, Deok-Hwan Yang, Yeo-Kyeoung Kim, Je-Jung Lee, Sang-Chul Lim, Hyeoung-Joon Kim, Woong-Ki Chung, Ik-Joo Chung
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2007; 39(3): 93.     CrossRef
  • 5,147 View
  • 21 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Combination Chemotherapy with Etoposide, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin (VIP) in Small Cell Lung Cancer
Goon Jae Cho, Joo Seop Chung, Ihm Soo Kwak, Ha Yeon Rha
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1999;31(3):539-547.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Combination chemotherapy has shown promising activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study was perfonned to determine the efficacy of the combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) in previously untreated patients with SCLC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients with SCLC were treated with etoposide (75 mg/m iv. D1-4), ifosfamide (1200 mg/m iv. Dl-4 with mesna) and cisplatin (20 mg/m iv. D1-4). The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles in principle. Thoracic radiotherapy was administered to patients with limited disease (LD) of SCLC after initial 2 or 3 cycles of chemotherapy subsequently. Praphylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was given to complete responders of SCLC.
RESULTS
From April 1996 through June 1998, 42 patients were included, but 32 were eligible for the study (4 refused of treatment, 2 lost in follow-up, and 4 combined with other disease). The median age was 62 years (range, 42-74). Twelve patients had LD and 20 patients were with extended disease (ED). Complete response (CR) rate was 34% (LD 58%, ED 20%) and overall response rate was 72% (LD 83%, ED 65%). The median duration of response was 28 weeks (38 weeks in LD, 24 weeks in ED, P=0.016) With the median follow-up period of 65 weeks (6-134 weeks), overall median survival was 43 weeks (56 weeks in LD, 34 weeks in ED, P 0.001), and the median disease free survival (DFS) of eleven CR patients was 16 weeks. Stage, performance, and LDH level were significant prognostic factom (P 0.011, 0.002, 0.043, respectively), but sex and age did not affect the outcome significantly. The hematologic side effects (WHO grade 2) of evaluable 152 cycles of chemotherapy were leukopenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (31%) and anemia (16%); and nonhematologic side effects (WHO grade >2) were alopecia (84%), nausea/vomiting (45%) and stomatitis (19%).
CONCLUSION
It appears that VIP combination chemotherapy is a safe, effective and well tolerated regimen for the patients with SCLC.
  • 2,670 View
  • 13 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP