Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine the level of health equity in relation to cancer incidence.
Materials and Methods
We used the National Health Insurance claims data of the National Health Insurance Service between 2005 and 2022 and annual health insurance and medical aid beneficiaries between 2011 and 2021 to investigate the disparities of cancer incidence. We calculated age-sex standardized cancer incidence rates by cancer and year according to the type of insurance and the trend over time using the annual percentage change. We also compared the hospital type of the first diagnosis by cancer type and year and cancer incidence rates by cancer type and region in 2021 according to the type of insurance.
Results
The total cancer incidence increased from 255,971 in 2011 to 325,772 cases in 2021. The absolute difference of total cancer incidence rate between the NHI beneficiaries and the medical aid (MA) recipients increased from 510.1 cases per 100,000 population to 536.9 cases per 100,000 population. The odds ratio of total cancer incidence for the MA recipients increased from 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77 to 1.82) to 1.90 (95% CI, 1.88 to 1.93). Disparities in access to hospitals and regional cancer incidence were profound.
Conclusion
This study examined health inequities in relation to cancer incidence over the last decade. Cancer incidence was higher in the MA recipients, and the gap was widening. We also found that regional differences in cancer incidence still exist and are getting worse. Investigating these disparities between the NHI beneficiaries and the MA recipients is crucial for implementing of public health policies to reduce health inequities.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
National Expenditures on Anticancer and Immunomodulating Agents During 2013–2022 in Korea Jieun Yun, Youngs Chang, Minsol Jo, Yerin Heo, Dong-Sook Kim Journal of Korean Medical Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A 5-Year Mortality Prediction Model for Prostate Cancer Patients Based on the Korean Nationwide Health Insurance Claims Database Joungyoun Kim, Yong-Hoon Kim, Yong-June Kim, Hee-Taik Kang Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(10): 1058. CrossRef
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of contrast enhanced pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in resectability and prognosis evaluation after staging computed tomography (CT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).
Materials and Methods
From January 2005 to December 2012, 298 patients were diagnosed to have potentially resectable stage PDA on CT. Patients were divided into CT+MR (patients underwent both CT and MRI; n=216) and CT only groups (n=82). Changes in resectability staging in the CT+MR group were evaluated. The overall survival was compared between the two groups. The recurrence-free survival and median time to liver metastasis after curative surgery were compared between the two groups.
Results
Staging was changed from resectable on CT to unresectable state on MRI in 14.4% of (31 of 216 patients) patients of the CT+MR group. The overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.162 and p=0.721, respectively). The median time to liver metastases after curative surgery in the CT+MR group (9.9 months) was significantly longer than that in the CT group (4.2 months) (p=0.011).
Conclusion
Additional MRI resulted in changes of resectability and treatment modifications in a significant proportion of patients who have potentially resectable state at CT and in prolonged time to liver metastases in patients after curative surgery. Additional MRI to standard staging CT can be recommended for surgical candidates of PDA.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments Doaa Bugazia, Ebtesam Al-Najjar, Abdullah Esmail, Saifudeen Abdelrahim, Karen Abboud, Adham Abdelrahim, Godsfavour Umoru, Hashem A. Rayyan, Ala Abudayyeh, Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa, Maen Abdelrahim Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom – Version 3.1 Thomas Seufferlein, Julia Mayerle, Stefan Boeck, Thomas Brunner, Thomas J. Ettrich, Lars Grenacher, Thomas Mathias Gress, Thilo Hackert, Volker Heinemann, Angelika Kestler, Marianne Sinn, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Wedding, Waldemar Uhl Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(10): e874. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom – Version 3.1 Thomas Seufferlein, Julia Mayerle, Stefan Boeck, Thomas Brunner, Thomas J. Ettrich, Lars Grenacher, Thomas Mathias Gress, Thilo Hackert, Volker Heinemann, Angelika Kestler, Marianne Sinn, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Wedding, Waldemar Uhl Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(10): 1724. CrossRef
Additional MRI for initial M-staging in pancreatic cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis Felix G. Gassert, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Johanna Luitjens, Florian T. Gassert, Fabian Tollens, Johann Rink, Marcus R. Makowski, Johannes Rübenthaler, Matthias F. Froelich European Radiology.2022; 32(4): 2448. CrossRef
Diagnostik beim Pankreaskarzinom – Update in der neuen Leitlinie L. Grenacher, M. Juchems, A. G. Schreyer, J. Wessling, K. I. Ringe, W. Uhl, J. Mayerle, T. Seufferlein Der Chirurg.2022; 93(5): 429. CrossRef
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: imaging techniques for diagnosis and management Jawaad Farrukh, Ravivarma Balasubramaniam, Anitha James, Sharan S Wadhwani, Raneem Albazaz British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2022; 83(5): 1. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom – Kurzversion 2.0 – Dezember 2021, AWMF-Registernummer: 032/010OL Thomas Seufferlein, Julia Mayerle, Stefan Böck, Thomas Brunner, Thomas J. Ettrich, Lars Grenacher, Thomas Mathias Gress, Thilo Hackert, Volker Heinemann, Angelika Kestler, Marianne Sinn, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Wedding, Waldemar Uhl Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2022; 60(06): 991. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom – Langversion 2.0 – Dezember 2021 – AWMF-Registernummer: 032/010OL Thomas Seufferlein, Julia Mayerle, Stefan Böck, Thomas Brunner, Thomas J. Ettrich, Lars Grenacher, Thomas Mathias Gress, Thilo Hackert, Volker Heinemann, Angelika Kestler, Marianne Sinn, Andrea Tannapfel, Ulrich Wedding, Waldemar Uhl Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2022; 60(11): e812. CrossRef
The Role of Imaging in Current Treatment Strategies for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Hyungjin Rhee, Mi-Suk Park Korean Journal of Radiology.2021; 22(1): 23. CrossRef
A Comparative Study of Survivor Outcomes between Preoperative Evaluation Using CT Alone and Combined CT and MRI in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Ji Eun Lee, Seong Hyun Kim, Soon Jin Lee, Seo-Youn Choi, Sunyoung Lee, Bo Ra Lee Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology.2021; 82(3): 638. CrossRef
СT and MRI in the assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic tumors A. V. Kudryavtseva, S. S. Bagnenko, I. I. Dzidzawa, I. S. Zheleznyak, G. E. Trufanov, V. V. Ryazanov, V. A. Krasovskaya, A. B. Kotiv, A. D. Kazakov Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery.2021; 26(1): 34. CrossRef
European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer Stefano Partelli, Francesco Sclafani, Sorin Traian Barbu, Marc Beishon, Pierluigi Bonomo, Graça Braz, Filippo de Braud, Thomas Brunner, Giulia Martina Cavestro, Mirjam Crul, Maria Die Trill, Piero Ferollà, Ken Herrmann, Eva Karamitopoulou, Cindy Neuzillet Cancer Treatment Reviews.2021; 99: 102208. CrossRef
ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Ken-ichi Okada, Manabu Kawai, Seiko Hirono, Masayuki Sho, Masaji Tani, Ippei Matsumoto, Suguru Yamada, Ryosuke Amano, Hirochika Toyama, Yo-ichi Yamashita, Takeshi Gocho, Kazuto Shibuya, Minako Nagai, Hiromitsu Maehira, Keiko Kamei, Go Ohira, Yoshihiro Shi Trials.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report Danling Guo, Chao Chen, Sangying Lv, Guanzuan Wu, Wei Shi, Huaifeng Li, Hongjie Hu Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Tumor-Specific miRNA Signatures in Combination with CA19-9 for Liquid Biopsy-Based Detection of PDAC Min Woo Kim, Hani Koh, Jee Ye Kim, Suji Lee, Hyojung Lee, Young Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Seung Il Kim International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(24): 13621. CrossRef
Imaging and Management of Pancreatic Cancer Mariya Kobi, Gregory Veillette, Roshni Narurkar, David Sadowsky, Viktoriya Paroder, Chaitanya Shilagani, Anthony Gilet, Milana Flusberg Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI.2020; 41(2): 139. CrossRef
DUPLICATE: Imaging and Management of Pancreatic Cancer Mariya Kobi, Gregory Veillette, Roshni Narurkar, David Sadowsky, Viktoriya Paroder, Chaitanya Shilagani, Anthony Gilet, Milana Flusberg Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Young Hyuk Im, Kee Hyung Lee, Young Suk Park, Chang In Suh, Won Ki Kang, Hyo Jin Kim, Heung Tae Kim, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim, Soon Beom Kang, Hyo Pyo Lee, Jin Yong Lee, Seung Wook
Twenty-nine patient with advanced cervix cancer were treated with a combination chemotherapy of cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin, and methotrexate between January, 1987 and December, 1988. 1) Among 19 evaluable patients, 4 patients (20.1%) achieved complete response and 6 patients (31. 6%) achieved partial response, giving an overall response rate of 51.7%. The median duration of remission was 23 weeks in the responders. 2) The median survival of overall patients was 50 7 weeks. The median survival of the responders did not reach the median value during the follow-up period of 15-81 weeks. In contrast, the median survival of the non-responders was 30.7 weeks, which was significantly shorter than that of the responders (p<0.05). 3) The only factor influencing remission rate was the pattem of failure, and the patients with distant metastasis showed higher remission rates (p<0.01). There were no prognostic factors influencing the remission duration. The factors improving survival rates were the early stage at diagnosis (p< 0. 005), the previous history of curative operation (p<0.005), and the presence of distant metastasis (p<0.01). 4) Considerable number of patients experienced toxicities. Among these, leukopenia (50%) and thrombocytopenia (4.7%) were the main hematologic toxicities. Most patients experienced nausea, vomiting, diarrhea (89.49o), stomatitis (26 3%), and alopecia (73.7%). Neurotoxicity due to vincristine or cispatin was found in 36.896 of patients, and 2 patients showed pulmonary fibrosis due to bleomycin toxicity. In conclusion, this regimen (PVBM) seems to be effective in terms of remission rates, but did not show any additional benifits in terms of remission duration or overall survival. In addition, the large number of patients experienced considerable side effects. Based on these findings, further studies are needed to find out the new regimen which is more effective and less toxic for the patients with advanced uterine cervix cancer.