Minsu Kang, Jeonghyun Kang, Changhoon Song, Heung-Kwon Oh, Hong Chung, Ilhak Lee, Jae Hung Jung, Jae Hyun Jeon, Eunjin Jeong, Jeong Rim Koh, Jung Hye Kwon, Jung-Yeon Choi, Kidong Kim, Kwangmin Kim, Kyung Hyun Moon, Minkyu Jung, Se Jin Hong, Su-Jin Koh, Sukki Cho, Suzy Kim, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Miyoung Choi, Dong Ah Park, Mi Ah Han, In Gyu Hwang, Jin Won Kim, Jee Hyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2026;58(4):1037-1053. Published online February 19, 2026
The Korean Cancer Association’s clinical practice guidelines for geriatric oncology provide an evidence-based, multidisciplinary framework to optimize cancer care for the growing population of older adults. Geriatric assessment (GA) identifies multidimensional vulnerabilities often missed by standard performance measures, providing critical information to guide individualized treatment planning. This guideline recommends using validated geriatric screening tools, life expectancy prediction models, and toxicity risk calculators to support risk stratification and decision-making. By integrating GA-based multidisciplinary interventions and shared decision-making into clinical practice, clinicians can avoid both overtreatment and undertreatment, reduce treatment-related toxicity, and potentially enhance quality of life. Although the certainty of evidence for most recommendations ranged from very low to low, the panel reached a consensus to provide conditional recommendations. This decision reflects the judgment that the clinical benefits—specifically in reducing treatment-related toxicity and identifying vulnerabilities—outweigh the limitations of current evidence, addressing the urgent need for standardized geriatric care in Korea. Ultimately, these guidelines aim to support individualized, patient-centered care and serve as a practical foundation for clinical and educational applications within the Korean healthcare system.
Purpose
This study systematically reviewed cancer screening guidelines for the Korean population to evaluate the benefits and harms of the recommended cancer screening practices.
Materials and Methods
We searched international electronic databases from inception to July 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted reference screening and data extraction. Data were extracted based on recommendations from each guideline and presentation of benefits and harms. General characteristics of the cancer screening guidelines, including cancer type, recommended screening methods, certainty of evidence, were collected. Moreover, we obtained key information on the benefits and harms of screening interventions, including the quantification of their relative and absolute effects.
Results
Fifteen recommendations were identified for the use of interventions for the early detection of stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, cervical, and lung cancers in nine guidelines published between 2011 and 2015. Seven guidelines collected evidence through de novo systematic reviews. Eight guidelines presented the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. Benefits are presented as relative risks, and harms are presented as absolute risks. Six recommendations presented the absolute effects of both benefits and harms (comparable); eight presented them unevenly, including quantifying benefits relatively but presenting harms as absolute measures (asymmetric); and one presented neither benefits nor harms (incomplete).
Conclusion
More than half of guidelines fail to present the benefits and harms of screening in a balanced manner. To enable users and beneficiaries make informed decisions based on evidence, the benefits and harms supporting recommendations should be given in a transparent and balanced manner.
Purpose
We aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 when applied to Korean non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 249 patients who underwent curative transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for primary orrecurrentNMIBCwere asked to complete theKorean version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and -NMIBC24 questionnaires three times (preoperative, post-TURBT 3 months and 6 months). Linguistic validation and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire was conducted.
Results
Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed satisfactory construct validity in five scales except the malaise scale. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70) for the five scales except the malaise scale at the all three time points. Known-group comparison analyses showed better quality-of-life (QOL) scores in patients with higher performance status as expected, and better sexual function in men than women (p < 0.05). Most of the scales had low correlations (< 0.40) with the scales in QLQ-C30 showing divergent validity, except for malaise scale which showed higher correlations (0.42 to 0.60). Responsiveness to change was consistent with clinical implications over time after TURBT.
Conclusion
The Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 has good reliability and cross-cultural validity for measuring various QOL aspects that can be self-administered to Korean NMIBC patients undergoing TURBT.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comprehensive nursing care for advanced digestive malignancy patients during chemotherapy based on probiotic intervention: a randomized controlled study on improvement of gastrointestinal function and prevention of complications Feng Huang, Qi Zhuo, Lijuan Zhang, Zheng Gao, Chennuo He, Lanlan Zhang Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Psychometric Validation of the QLQ-NMIBC24 in Low Grade, Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Charles Peyton, Rahul Dhanda, Tom Burke, Victoria Tsurutis, Nikky Ugwuoke, Anagha Nadkarni, Brent Burger, Veronica Lee, Michael Louie, Angela Stover Research and Reports in Urology.2026; Volume 18: 1. CrossRef
Influencing Factors of Unmet Care Needs Among Taiwanese Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer during Acute Stage of Survivorship: A Preliminary Study Yi-Rong Chen, Yeong-Chin Jou, Yung-Chang Lin, Hsiang-Ping Huang, Randal D. Beaton, Sui-Whi Jane Asian Nursing Research.2026; 20(2): 177. CrossRef
Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): A Systematic Review Ingolf Griebsch, Sunil Shrestha, Carolyn C. Gotay, John L. Gore, Fran Curtis, Andrew Bottomley Oncology and Therapy.2026; 14(3): 939. CrossRef
Health-related Quality of Life During the First 4 Years After Non–Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Diagnosis: Results of a Large Multicentre Prospective Cohort Ivy Beeren, Nena E. Klerks, Katja K. Aben, Jorg R. Oddens, J. Alfred Witjes, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Alina Vrieling European Urology Oncology.2024; 7(4): 829. CrossRef
Transurethral resection of bladder tumor with Bacille Calmette-Guerin intravesical instillation for HRNMIBC and factors influencing recurrence An Xu American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(11): 6914. CrossRef
The current use of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 and QLQ-BLM30 questionnaires for the assessment of health-related quality of life in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review E. Rammant, L. Fox, K. Beyer, N. K. Aaronson, R. Chaloner, S. De Padova, F. Liedberg, L. M. Wintner, K. Decaestecker, V. Fonteyne, N. Perdek, H. Wylie, J. W. F. Catto, T. M. Ripping, B. Holzner, M. Van Leeuwen, M. Van Hemelrijck Quality of Life Research.2023; 32(8): 2127. CrossRef
Quality of life in bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis Sima Rafiei, Golnaz Kheradkhah, Grigorios Kotronoulas, Maryam Doustmehraban, Farnoosh Shafiei, Maryam Masoumi, Elaheh Parnian, Elmira Nosrati Sanjabad, Ahmad Ghashghaee BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.2023; 13(e3): e707. CrossRef
Quality of life patterns and its association with predictors among non-muscle invasive bladder cancer survivors: A latent profile analysis Jeongok Park, Young Deuk Choi, Kyoungjin Lee, Miae Seo, Ahyoung Cho, Sejeong Lee, Keum-hee Nam Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2022; 9(6): 100063. CrossRef
Validation and reliability of the Dutch version of the EORTC QLQ-BLM30 module for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer T. M. Ripping, E. Rammant, J. A. Witjes, N. K. Aaronson, M. van Hemelrijck, L. M. C. van Hoogstraten, J. Boormans, C. A. Goossens, A. G. van der Heijden, M. C. C. M. Hulshof, G. J. L. H. van Leenders, A. M. van Leliveld, R. P. Meijer, R. J. A. van Moorsel Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Validation and reliability of the Dutch version of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 Questionnaire Module for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer Theodora M. Ripping, Ellen Westhoff, Neil K. Aaronson, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Elke Rammant, J. Alfred Witjes, Lambertus. A. Kiemeney, Katja K. H. Aben, Alina Vrieling Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Humanistic and Economic Burden of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of Two Systematic Literature Reviews
Lauren J Lee, Christina S Kwon, Anna Forsythe, Carla M Mamolo, Elizabeth T Masters, Ira A Jacobs ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research.2020; Volume 12: 693. CrossRef
Effect of a patient education and rehabilitation program on anxiety, depression and quality of life in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy Zhonghui Li, Dan Wei, Chenxi Zhu, Qing Zhang Medicine.2019; 98(44): e17437. CrossRef