Prognostic Significance of CD24 Expression in Gastric Carcinoma

Nevine S. Darwish; Min A Kim; Mee Soo Chang; Hye Seung Lee; Byung Lan Lee; Yong Il Kim; Woo Ho Kim

doi:10.4143/crt.2004.36.5.298

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 36(5); 2004 > Article

Original Article Prognostic Significance of CD24 Expression in Gastric Carcinoma: Nevine S. Darwish, M.D., Ph.D.³, Min A Kim, M.D.¹, Mee Soo Chang, M.D., Ph.D.¹, Hye Seung Lee, M.D., Ph.D.¹, Byung Lan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.², Yong Il Kim, M.D., Ph.D.¹, Woo Ho Kim, M.D., Ph.D.^1,2; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2004;36(5):298-302.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.5.298
Published online: October 30, 2004

¹Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

²Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

³Histology Laboratory, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Cairo, Egypt.

Correspondence: Woo Ho Kim, Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong, Seoul 110-799, Korea. (Tel) +82-02-740-8269, (Fax) +82-02-765-5600, wwwhokim@snu.ac.kr

• Received: September 13, 2004 • Accepted: October 21, 2004

11,494 Views
61 Download
26 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
The human CD24 antigen is a small heavily glycosylated cell surface protein, which is expressed in hematological malignancies, as well as in a large variety of solid tumors. Its expression is now known to be related to the prognosis of several kinds of tumors. This study is designed to examine the prognostic significance of CD24 in Korean gastric cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
In the present study, we examined CD24 expression in 300 consecutive cases of gastric carcinoma by immunohistochemical staining using the tissue-array method. We also investigated the clinicopathological profiles related to CD24 expression.
Results
One hundred and three cases out of 300 (34.3%) showed the positive expression of CD24. The altered expression of CD24 was significantly associated with differentiated cancer (p=0.003), the intestinal subtype according to the Lauren classification (p<0.001), the advanced stage cancer (p=0.027), with lymphatic invasion (p=0.038) and with vascular invasion (p=0.006). The survival analysis revealed that the patients with CD24 positive expression showed significantly poorer survival than those without CD24 expression. Moreover, a combined evaluation revealed that PTEN+/CD24- cases showed the best survival compared to other groups (p=0.01).
Conclusion
Positive CD24 expression occurs in a subset of gastric carcinomas and it correlates significantly with lymphatic invasion, blood vessel invasion and poor survival.
Key words: Immunohistochemistry, Survival analysis, Stomach neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

CD24 has recently attracted considerable interest, as it belongs to the small group of mucin-type glycoprotein ligands for P-selectin. P-selectin is rapidly induced on the surface of platelets or endothelial cells following activation with a variety of agents (1). The human CD24 antigen is a small heavily glycosylated, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) linked cell surface protein. It consists of a small protein core comprising 27 amino acids, which is extensively glycosylated and is bound to the membrane via a phosphatidyl-inositol anchor (2). The human CD24 antigen is physiologically expressed in developing or regenerating tissue, as well as in granulocytes, keratinocytes and renal tubular epithelium. It is normally expressed on the surface of the B cell precursor, but its expression is lost with the onset of plasma cell differentiation. In neoplasia, its expression has been described initially in hematological malignancies, but also in a large variety of solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, glioma, breast cancer and ovarian cancer (3). Recent studies have shown that in ovarian cancer the mean survival time for patients with tumors showing cytoplasmic CD24 staining is less than half that of patients with tumors which do not show cytoplasmic CD24 staining (4). Similar observations were reported for breast (5) and prostate carcinomas (6).

In this study, we examine the consecutive cases of gastric cancer and evaluate the relationship between CD24 expression and the clinicopathologic data including patients' survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1) Patients and samples

A total of 300 consecutive, surgically resected cases of gastric carcinomas were identified from the files of the Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine. The age, gender, tumor location, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion and pTNM stage were evaluated by reviewing the medical charts and pathological records. Glass slides were reviewed for histological classification according to the WHO and the Lauren classification systems. The mean age of the patients was 54.3 years. No patient had received preoperative chemo- or radiotherapy, and 92.7% (278/300) of the patients had undergone curative resection (R0 according to the UICC guideline). The clinical outcome of the patients was followed from the date of surgery to either the date of death or December 1, 2000, resulting in a follow-up period ranging from 1~72 months (mean: 53 months). Those cases lost to follow-up and those ending in death from any cause other than gastric cancer were regarded as censored data during the analysis of the survival rates.

2) Immunohistochemistry

The protein expression of CD24 was assessed by an immunohistochemical staining method using a tissue array (Superbiochips laboratories, Seoul, Korea). Core tissues biopsies (2 mm in diameter) were taken from individual paraffin-embedded gastric tumors and seeded in a new recipient paraffin block (tissue array block) using a trephine apparatus. Each tissue array block consisted of 60 samples, and each block contained normal gastric mucosa from the body, antrum and cardia. Sections of 4µm thickness were cut from each tissue array block.

After the sections were deparaffinized and dehydrated, and immunohistochemical staining with antibody against CD24 (mouse monoclonal antibody; Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA) was performed using a streptavidin-biotin peroxidase procedure, following an antigen retrieval process with microwaves. To prevent the decay of antigenicity, immunohistochemistry was performed within a week after slide preparation. In the previous experiment, we studied the expression of several antigens using the same tissue array slides (7,8). We obtained the expression results of PTEN (anti-PTEN, AG Scientific, San Diego, CA) and CD44 (anti-CD44, Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) from the previous study, and compared the result with the CD24 expression.

3) Statistical analysis

For the clinicopathologic analysis, the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test (two sided) was performed. The cumulated survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between the curves were tested for significance using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We included CD24 expression, sex, pathologic staging, and histologic parameters (Lauren's classification, lymphoid stroma and lymphatic invasion) in the multivariate analysis. The results were considered to be statistically significant when the p values were less than 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 11.0 statistical software program (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

The non-neoplastic gastric mucosa did not show CD24 expression. In the case of the gastric carcinomas, membranous and cytoplasmic expression of CD24 was found (Fig. 1). CD24 immunoreactivity was detected in 103 of the 300 gastric carcinomas (34.3%). The clinicopathological data of our study are presented in Table 1. The positive CD24 expression was more prevalent in the cancers of the upper portion (71.4%, p=0.031), in differentiated cancer (45.4%, p=0.003), in the intestinal subtype according to the Lauren classification (44.6%, p<0.001) and in advanced cancer (38.1%, p=0.027). The correlations with lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were statistically insignificant, however, significant association was noted with lymphatic invasion (43.2%, p=0.038) and with vascular invasion (63.2%, p=0.006)

We compared the survival of patients whose tumors expressed CD24 with that of patients whose tumors did not express CD24 (Fig. 2A). The cumulative survival rate was significantly better in patients with CD24-negative tumors than in those with CD24-positive tumors (p=0.0207). By multivariate analysis, pathologic staging is the strongest prognostic parameter, and lymphatic invasion is also a prognostic factor. CD24 overexpression was found to be significantly associated with patient survival independently of the pTNM stage or lymphatic invasion (p=0.044, Table 2).

We compared the expression of CD44 and CD24, because both of them are the ligands of adhesion molecules. The expression of CD24 and CD44 is positively correlated; CD24 expression was found to be higher in CD44 (+) cases (47.1%) than in CD44 (-) cases (32.5%, p=0.048). When we compared the expression of CD24 and PTEN, they are negatively correlated; CD24 was expressed in 31.7% of PTEN (+) cases, but in 46.7% of PTEN (-) cases (p=0.031). We investigated the survival difference of each group with combinational expression of CD24 and PTEN proteins. PTEN(+)/CD24(-) cases showed the best survival (mean survival, 61 months) among the four groups (p=0.0003, Fig. 2B).

DISCUSSION

CD24 is a cell-surface glycoprotein involved in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. There is increasing evidence that CD24 contributes to both cellular signaling and cell adhesion(1). CD24 is expressed during progression and metastasis in ovarian (4), breast (5) and prostate cancers (6).

The results of the current study showed that CD24 immunoreactivity was detected in 38.1% of advanced carcinomas compared to 24.7% of early carcinomas (p=0.027); and in 45.4% of cases with differentiated tumors compared to 28.1% of cases with undifferentiated tumors (p=0.003). We also noted that CD24 expression in cases with lymphatic invasion was 43.2% (p=0.038). Furthermore, 63.2% of tumors with vascular invasion showed CD24 expression (p=0.006)(Table 1). These results suggest that the positive expression of CD24 characterizes gastric carcinomas with more aggressive phenotype.

It is well known that the depth of tumor invasion, distant metastasis and lymph node metastasis are the major prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. Recently, the expression of different cell surface antigens in various malignant tumors has been reported to be one of the biologic markers of malignant potential. By subtractive technique, CD24 was selected as one of metastasis-associated genes, and CD24 was confirmed to be overexpressed in the metastatic phenotype (9). The mechanism of cancer progression resulting from expressional alteration remains unknown. However, CD24 overexpression may be useful as a marker that indicates invasiveness and poor prognosis.

The mechanism of GPI-anchored protein-mediated signaling remains intriguing, because these proteins do not have any cytoplasmic domain to transduce intracellular signals. A recently proposed concept of glycolipid-enriched membrane (GEM) domains or rafts is expected to provide an explanation for the signaling properties of GPI-anchored proteins (10). CD24 molecules are distributed only in the GEM fractions, and CD24 mediates a negative signal for B cell survival through a GEM-dependent mechanism, that is closely related to the B cell receptor (BCR)-mediated apoptotic signal. This in turn suggests that CD24 mediates the apoptotic signal in B cells upon ligand stimulation or that CD24-mediated stimuli augment BCR- mediated apoptosis in Burkitt's lymphoma cells (11).

It has been speculated that human tumors may use selectins or their ligands during invasion and metastasis (1). In fact, inflammation and trauma, which induce the expression of selectins, can influence the spread of tumor cells. The CD24/P-selectin binding pathway could be important in the dissemination of tumor cells by facilitating the interaction with platelets or endothelial cells (12). The function of CD44 is principally dependant on cellular adhesion. In addition, the CD44 receptor and E-selectin are currently potential candidates for involvement in the extravasation process of gastric tumor cells, which includes the lodging of malignant cells between endothelial cells and their subsequent adhesion to the extracellular matrices, leading to the manifestation of metastatic nodules (13).

Furthermore, it has been found that CD24 can act as a specific ligand for P-selectin (1) and that CD24 expressed by breast carcinoma is necessary and sufficient to support P-selectin dependent rolling in vitro and in vivo (14). Taken together, these findings may indicate that both CD24 and CD44 contribute to the process of metastasis simultaneously through binding with P-selectin and E-selectin, respectively. This is supported by the fact that each of three selectins can have unique binding sites coexisting on a given carcinoma mucin molecule (15). Such a theory supports our results, wherein CD24 positive expression was observed in 63% of the cases of carcinoma with vascular invasion (p=0.006), and increased positive expression of CD44 was observed in the CD24 positive cases.

PTEN is a multifunctional protein endowed with a phosphatase activity capable of dephosphorylating not only proteins, but also phospholipids of the phosphatidylinositol pathway. Its protein phosphatase activity allows it to affect the interactions of cells with the intercellular matrix. These interactions are important in the mechanism of invasion (16). Thus, PTEN can inhibit cell growth, invasion, migration, and focal adhesions. It has been reported that the silencing of the PTEN gene occurs frequently in gastric carcinoma, and that the loss of expression of the PTEN gene is associated with tumor progression, metastasis and poor survival (8,17). It is interesting to note that the PTEN+/CD24- group showed the best prognosis compared to other groups. The clinical relevance of this finding should be confirmed by further experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that positive CD24 expression occurs in a subset of gastric carcinomas and that it correlates significantly with lymphatic invasion, blood vessel invasion and poor survival. CD24 may be a potential prognostic factor in gastric carcinoma.

Acknowledgements

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grant number 04-97-047 from Seoul National University Hospital, and #98-33 from Korea Fundation for Cancer Research Grant.

REFERENCES

1. Aigner S, Sthoeger ZM, Fogel M, Weber E, Zarn J, Ruppert M, Zeller Y, Vestweber D, Stahel R, Sammar M, Altevogt P. CD24, a mucin- type glycoprotein, is a ligand for P-selectin on human tumor cells. Blood. 1997;89:3385–3395. PMID: 9129046Article PubMed
2. Kay R, Rosten PM, Humphries RK. CD24, a signal transducer modulating B cell activation responses, is a very short peptide with a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor. J Immunol. 1991;147:1412–1416. PMID: 1831224Article PubMed PDF
3. Akashi T, Shirasawa T, Hirokawa K. Gene expression of CD24 core polypeptide molecule in normal rat tissues and human tumor cell lines. Virchows Arch. 1994;425:399–406. PMID: 7820302Article PubMed
4. Kristiansen G, Denkert C, Schluns K, Dahl E, Pilarsky C, Hauptmann S. CD24 is expressed in ovarian cancer and is a new independent prognostic marker of patient survival. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:1215–1221. PMID: 12368195Article PubMed PMC
5. Fogel M, Friederichs J, Zeller Y, Husar M, Smirnov A, Roitman L, Altevogt P, Sthoeger ZM. CD24 is a marker for human breast carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 1999;143:87–94. PMID: 10465342Article PubMed
6. Kristiansen G, Pilarsky C, Pervan J, Sturzebecher B, Stephan C, Jung K, Loening S, Rosenthal A, Dietel M. CD24 expression is a significant predictor of PSA relapse and poor prognosis in low grade or organ confined prostate cancer. Prostate. 2004;58:183–192. PMID: 14716744Article PubMed
7. Lee HS, Lee HK, Kim HS, Yang HK, Kim WH. Tumour suppressor gene expression correlates with gastric cancer prognosis. J Pathol. 2003;200:39–46. PMID: 12692839Article PubMed
8. Lee HS, Lee HK, Kim HS, Yang HK, Kim YI, Kim WH. MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 expressions in gastric carcinomas: their roles as prognostic indicators. Cancer. 2001;92:1427–1434. PMID: 11745219Article PubMed
9. Nestl A, Von Stein OD, Zatloukal K, Thies WG, Herrlich P, Hofmann M, Sleeman JP. Gene expression patterns associated with the metastatic phenotype in rodent and human tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1569–1577. PMID: 11245467PubMed
10. Ilangumaran S, He HT, Hoessli DC. Microdomains in lymphocyte signalling: beyond GPI-anchored proteins. Immunol Today. 2000;21:2–7. PMID: 10637551Article PubMed
11. Suzuki T, Kiyokawa N, Taguchi T, Sekino T, Katagiri YU, Fujimoto J. CD24 induces apoptosis in human B cells via the glycolipid-enriched membrane domains/rafts-mediated signaling system. J Immunol. 2001;166:5567–5577. PMID: 11313396Article PubMed
12. Friederichs J, Zeller Y, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Grone HJ, Ley K, Altevogt P. The CD24/P-selectin binding pathway initiates lung arrest of human A125 adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:6714–6722. PMID: 11118057PubMed
13. Kanai Y, Hirohashi S. . In: Sugimura T, Sasako M, editors. Invasion and metastasis. Gastric Cancer. 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 109–123.
14. Aigner S, Ramos CL, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Lawrence MB, Friederichs J, Altevogt P, Ley K. CD24 mediates rolling of breast carcinoma cells on P-selectin. FASEB J. 1998;12:1241–1251. PMID: 9737727Article PubMed
15. Kim YJ, Borsig L, Varki NM, Varki A. P-selectin deficiency attenuates tumor growth and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9325–9330. PMID: 9689079Article PubMed PMC
16. Roux P. PTEN: a tumor suppressor with original properties. Bull Cancer. 1999;86:522–525. PMID: 10417424PubMed
17. Kang YH, Lee HS, Kim WH. Promoter methylation and silencing of PTEN in gastric carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2002;82:285–291. PMID: 11896207Article PubMed

Fig. 1

Microscopic features of CD24 immunohistochemistry. The gastric carcinomas were analyzed using the tissue array method (A, ×1). Non-neoplastic gastric mucosa did not express CD24 (B, ×200). A gastric cancer with intense membraneous and cytoplasmic staining of CD24 (C, ×200). A case with negative CD24 expression in cancer cells (D, ×200).

Fig. 2

Survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method. A. Survival analysis showed that CD24 positive tumors have an unfavorable prognosis compared to CD24 negative carcinomas (p=0.02). B. Survival analysis according to the expression of two proteins. The patients with PTEN+ and CD24- expression pattern showed the best outcome (p=0.0003).

Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of CD24 expression in gastric cancers

Table 2

Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model. The CD24 expression is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer

Table 3

Correlation between CD24 expression and CD44 or PTEN expression in gastric cancers

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

CD24 blockade as a novel strategy for cancer treatment
Yawen Wang, Haoran Yu, Mengyuan Yu, Hui Liu, Bing Zhang, Yuanyuan Wang, Simin Zhao, Qingxin Xia
International Immunopharmacology.2023; 121: 110557. CrossRef
Emerging Immune Checkpoint Molecules on Cancer Cells: CD24 and CD200
Sun Young Moon, Minjoo Han, Gyoungah Ryu, Seong-Ah Shin, Jun Hyuck Lee, Chang Sup Lee
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(20): 15072. CrossRef
Clinical and prognostic significances of cancer stem cell markers in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Mahdieh Razmi, Roya Ghods, Somayeh Vafaei, Maryam Sahlolbei, Leili Saeednejad Zanjani, Zahra Madjd
Cancer Cell International.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Exosomes and GPI-anchored proteins: Judicious pairs for investigating biomarkers from body fluids
Michel Vidal
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2020; 161-162: 110. CrossRef
CD24, A Review of its Role in Tumor Diagnosis, Progression and Therapy
Yang-Hong Ni, Xia Zhao, Wei Wang
Current Gene Therapy.2020; 20(2): 109. CrossRef
DNA Aptamers for the Malignant Transformation Marker CD24
Joanna Fafińska, Andreas Czech, Tobias Sitz, Zoya Ignatova, Ulrich Hahn
Nucleic Acid Therapeutics.2018; 28(6): 326. CrossRef
The Identifications and Clinical Implications of Cancer Stem Cells in Colorectal Cancer
S.M. Riajul Wahab, Farhadul Islam, Vinod Gopalan, Alfred King-yin Lam
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2017; 16(2): 93. CrossRef
Clinicopathological and Prognostic Value of CD24 Expression in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Gao Liu, Guo-Xing Liu, Yu Fang, Zhen-Yu Cao, Hui-Hui Du, Jie Fu, Ke Qian
The International Journal of Biological Markers.2017; 32(2): 182. CrossRef
CD24 associates with EGFR and supports EGF/EGFR signaling via RhoA in gastric cancer cells
Wenjie Deng, Luo Gu, Xiaojie Li, Jianchao Zheng, Yujie Zhang, Biao Duan, Jie Cui, Jing Dong, Jun Du
Journal of Translational Medicine.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
CD24 enrichment protects while its loss increases susceptibility of juvenile chondrocytes towards inflammation
Jieun Lee, Piera Smeriglio, Jason Dragoo, William J. Maloney, Nidhi Bhutani
Arthritis Research & Therapy.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
CD44v3+/CD24− cells possess cancer stem cell-like properties in human oral squamous cell carcinoma
KEITA TODOROKI, SACHIKO OGASAWARA, JUN AKIBA, MASAMICHI NAKAYAMA, YOSHIKI NAITO, NAOKO SEKI, JINGO KUSUKAWA, HIROHISA YANO
International Journal of Oncology.2016; 48(1): 99. CrossRef
CD44 and CD24 coordinate the reprogramming of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells towards a cancer stem cell phenotype through STAT3 activation
Yao-An Shen, Chia-Yu Wang, Hui-Yen Chuang, John Jeng-Jong Hwang, Wei-Hsin Chi, Chih-Hung Shu, Ching-Yin Ho, Wing-Yin Li, Yann-Jang Chen
Oncotarget.2016; 7(36): 58351. CrossRef
CD24 Overexpression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Luminal A and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Mi Jeong Kwon, Jinil Han, Ji Hyun Seo, Kyoung Song, Hae Min Jeong, Jong-Sun Choi, Yu Jin Kim, Seon-Heui Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Young Kee Shin, Yves St-Pierre
PLOS ONE.2015; 10(10): e0139112. CrossRef
Significance of the expression of EMMPRIN, CD24 and p16INK4a promoter methylation in gastric carcinoma
Ahlam A. AbdelMaksoud
Egyptian Journal of Pathology.2015; 35(1): 53. CrossRef
Expression of CD24, p21, p53, and c‐myc in alpha‐fetoprotein‐producing gastric cancer: Correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics and survival
Xiaowen Liu, Hongmei Yu, Hong Cai, Yanong Wang
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2014; 109(8): 859. CrossRef
CD24 mediates gastric carcinogenesis and promotes gastric cancer progression via STAT3 activation
Ying-Chao Wang, Ji-Lin Wang, Xuan Kong, Tian-Tian Sun, Hao-Yan Chen, Jie Hong, Jing-Yuan Fang
Apoptosis.2014; 19(4): 643. CrossRef
CD44 but not CD24 expression is related to poor prognosis in non-cardia adenocarcinoma of the stomach
Xueyuan Cao, Donghui Cao, MeiShan Jin, Zhifang Jia, Fei Kong, Hongxi Ma, Yinping Wang, Jing Jiang
BMC Gastroenterology.2014;[Epub] CrossRef
Hypoxia‐mediated CD24 expression is correlated with gastric cancer aggressiveness by promoting cell migration and invasion
Nobuaki Fujikuni, Hideki Yamamoto, Kazuaki Tanabe, Yutaka Naito, Naoya Sakamoto, Yuka Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yanagihara, Naohide Oue, Wataru Yasui, Hideki Ohdan
Cancer Science.2014; 105(11): 1411. CrossRef
Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of CD24 Overexpression in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Jing-Xun Wu, Yuan-Yuan Zhao, Xuan Wu, Han-Xiang An, Yitao Ding
PLoS ONE.2014; 9(12): e114746. CrossRef
Biomarkers for predicting future metastasis of human gastrointestinal tumors
Lui Ng, Ronnie Tung Ping Poon, Roberta Pang
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.2013; 70(19): 3631. CrossRef
CD44/CD24 Expression in recurrent gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis
Ching-Shya Yong, Chih-Ming Ou Yang, Yenn-Hwei Chou, Chao-Sheng Liao, Chung-Wei Lee, Chin-Cheng Lee
BMC Gastroenterology.2012;[Epub] CrossRef
PTEN deletion is rare but often homogeneous in gastric cancer
Sormeh Mina, Benjamin A Bohn, Ronald Simon, Antje Krohn, Matthias Reeh, Dirk Arnold, Carsten Bokemeyer, Guido Sauter, Jakob R Izbicki, Andreas Marx, Phillip R Stahl
Journal of Clinical Pathology.2012; 65(8): 693. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of loss of c-fos protein in gastric carcinoma
Seon Pil Jin, Ji Hun Kim, Min A Kim, Han-Kwang Yang, Hee Eun Lee, Hye Seung Lee, Woo Ho Kim
Pathology & Oncology Research.2007; 13(4): 284. CrossRef
Tissue Array Methods for High-throughput Clinicopathologic Research
Hye Seung Lee, Woo Ho Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment.2006; 38(1): 1. CrossRef
Loss of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit (DNA-PKcs) Expression in Gastric Cancers
Hye Seung Lee, Han-Kwang Yang, Woo Ho Kim, Gheeyoung Choe
Cancer Research and Treatment.2005; 37(2): 98. CrossRef
Cytoplasmic CD24 Expression in Colorectal Cancer Independently Correlates with Shortened Patient Survival
Wilko Weichert, Carsten Denkert, Mick Burkhardt, Tserenchunt Gansukh, Joachim Bellach, Peter Altevogt, Manfred Dietel, Glen Kristiansen
Clinical Cancer Research.2005; 11(18): 6574. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Prognostic Significance of CD24 Expression in Gastric Carcinoma

Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(5):298-302. Published online October 30, 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.5.298

XML Download

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES

Prognostic Significance of CD24 Expression in Gastric Carcinoma

Fig. 1 Microscopic features of CD24 immunohistochemistry. The gastric carcinomas were analyzed using the tissue array method (A, ×1). Non-neoplastic gastric mucosa did not express CD24 (B, ×200). A gastric cancer with intense membraneous and cytoplasmic staining of CD24 (C, ×200). A case with negative CD24 expression in cancer cells (D, ×200).

Fig. 2 Survival curves using the Kaplan-Meier method. A. Survival analysis showed that CD24 positive tumors have an unfavorable prognosis compared to CD24 negative carcinomas (p=0.02). B. Survival analysis according to the expression of two proteins. The patients with PTEN+ and CD24- expression pattern showed the best outcome (p=0.0003).

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Prognostic Significance of CD24 Expression in Gastric Carcinoma

Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of CD24 expression in gastric cancers

Table 2

Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model. The CD24 expression is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer

Table 3

Correlation between CD24 expression and CD44 or PTEN expression in gastric cancers

Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of CD24 expression in gastric cancers

Table 2 Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model. The CD24 expression is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer

Table 3 Correlation between CD24 expression and CD44 or PTEN expression in gastric cancers