, Young Bae Choi1
, Hyun Joo Jung1, Jun Eun Park2 This article has been accepted for publication following full peer review and is provided as an unedited Accepted Article to allow early access to its findings. It has not yet undergone copyediting, typesetting, pagination, or proofreading, and the final Version of Record may differ from this version.
Purpose
Outcomes of children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated using an institutional risk-adapted strategy were assessed, and survival was compared among risk groups.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study included patients newly diagnosed with ALL during 2006–2020. Patients were stratified as standard-risk (SR), high-risk (HR), or very-high-risk (VHR). The SR group received a POG 9605-based protocol in 2006–2011 and a modified regimen with an additional delayed intensification phase in 2012–2020. The HR group received the ALL 0601 regimen, and the VHR group received institutional hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-oriented treatment.
Results
Ninety-two patients were included (SR, 34; HR, 45; and VHR, 13). The 10-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 85.2% and 70.9%, with cumulative incidences of relapse and treatment-related mortality of 22.6% and 3.3%, respectively. The 10-year OS was 92.8%, 88.7%, and 60.9% in the SR, HR, and VHR groups, and the corresponding 10-year EFS was 78.5%, 77.2%, and 34.2%, respectively. In SR, 10-year OS/EFS were 85.1%/71.4% in 2006–2011 and 100%/84.4% in 2012–2020. In the HR group, rapid early responders exhibited significantly better outcomes than did slow early responders, with 10-year OS of 97.0% vs. 63.6% (p = 0.001) and 10-year EFS of 87.9% vs. 43.6% (p < 0.001). Most relapses occurred during therapy or within 3 years of treatment completion.
Conclusion
VHR patients and HR patients with slow early response demonstrated the poorest outcomes. This supports refining risk-directed treatment strategies, including prospective evaluation of intensified and novel therapeutic approaches.
