Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Cancer Assoc > Accepted articles > Article
Original Article
Gender Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival According to Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) Risk Stratification
Ke Liu1orcid , Zhen-Zhen Lu2, Zhen-Yu He3orcid , San-Gang Wu4orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.361 [Accepted]
Published online: May 27, 2025
1Xiamen Key Laboratory of Clinical Efficacy and Evidence Studies of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
2The School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
4Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Quality Control Center, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Corresponding author:  Zhen-Yu He
Email: hezhy@sysucc.org.cn
San-Gang Wu
Email: wusg@xmu.edu.cn
Ke Liu and Zhen-Zhen Lu contributed equally to this work.
Received: 31 March 2025   • Accepted: 21 May 2025
  • 215 Views
  • 20 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

Purpose
The role of The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) in male breast cancer (MBC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of CTS5 between MBC and female breast cancer (FBC).
Materials and Methods
Patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative /estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the SEER database. The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were used for statistical analysis.
Results
This study included 169869 patients, comprising 168422 (99.1%) FBC and 1447 (0.9%) MBC patients. More MBC patients had intermediate risk (IR)/high risk (HR) disease compared to FBC patients (17.7% vs. 8.7%, p<0.001). MBC patients had an inferior overall survival (OS) but similar breast cancer-specific survival compared to those with FBC. Sensitivity analyses showed that gender was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS but not BCSS in both the low-risk (LR) and IR/HR cohorts. Those with MBC exhibited significantly worse OS (p<0.001) than FBC patients in both cohorts. In MBC patients, those with IR/HR disease had significantly worse OS (P<0.001) and BCSS (p<0.001) compared to those with LR disease. For FBC patients, the IR/HR group had also significantly worse OS (p<0.001) and BCSS (p<0.001) compared to the LR group.
Conclusion
Our findings highlight critical differences in clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes between MBC and FBC, suggesting the need for gender-tailored approaches in breast cancer management.

  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Gender Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival According to Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) Risk Stratification
    Close

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP