Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Cancer Assoc > Accepted articles > Article
Original Article
Which Chemotherapy-Related Terms were Difficult for Cancer Patients, and Who Would Have the Most Difficulties?
Mangyeong Lee1,2orcid , Nayeon Kim2,3, Ho-Young Kim3, Ayoung Lee3, Junghee Yoon4,5, Juhee Cho3,4orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.485 [Accepted]
Published online: December 3, 2024
1Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
2Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
3Cancer Education Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
4Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
5Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author:  Juhee Cho
Tel: 82-2-3410-1448 Email: jh1448.cho@samsung.com
Mangyeong Lee and Nayeon Kim contributed equally to this work.
Received: 22 May 2024   • Accepted: 2 December 2024
  • 234 Views
  • 12 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

Purpose
This cross-sectional study aimed to examine which chemotherapy (CTx) terms were most difficult to understand for cancer patients and identify vulnerable patient populations who might need extra support to understand the terms.
Materials and Methods
We listed 56 CTx-related terms based on the experts’ review, then 300 cancer patients and their caregivers completed a questionnaire that assessed literacy in CTx terms (LCT), functional health literacy, and empowerment. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine which CTx-related terms were most difficult for them. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with LCT level.
Results
Of the total 300 people, 162 (54.0%) were in the low-scoring (LS) group in LCT. LS group had a higher proportion of males, lower monthly income, and lived at the province, compared to the high scoring (HS) group. The participants tended to have difficulties in understanding terms related to blood count, risk of infection, and symptoms written in Sino-Korean. In the multivariable logistic regression, male participants (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 2.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48–4.62), those with no cancer-related information-seeking (aOR = 4.32, 95% CI: 1.75–12.33), and those with low empowerment (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.83–5.23) were more likely to have a low level of LCT.
Conclusion
There were still linguistic health literacy challenges faced by cancer patients and their caregivers, specifically in understanding chemotherapy-related terms. Minimizing medical jargon and Sino-Korean terms and empowering patients to be ready for treatment are necessary.

  • Cite
    CITE
    export Copy Download
    Close
    Download Citation
    Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

    Format:
    • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
    • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
    Include:
    • Citation for the content below
    Which Chemotherapy-Related Terms were Difficult for Cancer Patients, and Who Would Have the Most Difficulties?
    Close

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP