Hyung-Don Kim; Hyungwoo Cho; Shin Kim; Kyoungmin Lee; Eun Hee Kang; Jung Sun Park; Chan-Sik Park; Jooryung Huh; Jin Sook Ryu; Sang-Wook Lee; Dok-Hyun Yoon; Seok Jin Kim; Young Hyeh Ko; Won Seog Kim; Cheolwon Suh

doi:10.4143/crt.2020.1060

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 53(3); 2021 > Article

Original Article Hematologic Malignancy Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Burkitt Lymphoma Using Serum β2-microglobulin Levels: Hyung-Don Kim¹, Hyungwoo Cho¹, Shin Kim¹, Kyoungmin Lee¹, Eun Hee Kang¹, Jung Sun Park¹, Chan-Sik Park², Jooryung Huh², Jin Sook Ryu³, Sang-Wook Lee⁴, Dok-Hyun Yoon¹, Seok Jin Kim⁵, Young Hyeh Ko⁶, Won Seog Kim⁵, Cheolwon Suh¹; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2021;53(3):847-856.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1060
Published online: December 17, 2020

¹Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

³Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

⁴Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

⁵Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

⁶Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Cheolwon Suh, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea,
Tel: 82-2-3010-3209, Fax: 82-2-3010-6961, E-mail: csuh@amc.seoul.kr

• Received: October 15, 2020 • Accepted: December 16, 2020

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

6,134 Views
151 Download
12 Web of Science
12 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of serum β2-microglobulin for patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and to propose a risk-stratifying classification system.
Materials and Methods
A prospective registry-based cohort study of BL patients treated with dose-intensive or effective dose-adjusted chemotherapies (n=81) was conducted. Survival outcomes were compared based on previously reported risk groups and/or serum β2-microglobulin levels. A risk-stratifying classification system incorporating serum β2-microglobulin levels was proposed and validated in an independent validation cohort (n=60).
Results
The median age was 47 years, and 57 patients (70.4%) were male. Patients with high serum β2-microglobulin levels (> 2 mg/L) had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01 for both). Serum β2-microglobulin levels further stratified patients in the low-risk and high-risk groups in terms of PFS (p=0.010 and p=0.044, respectively) and OS (p=0.014 and p=0.026, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that a high serum β2-microglobulin level (> 2 mg/L) was independently associated with a shorter PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 3.56; p=0.047) and OS (HR, 4.66; p=0.043). The new classification system incorporating the serum β2-microglobulin level allowed the stratification of patients into three distinct risk subgroups with 5-year OS rates of 100%, 89.5%, and 62.5%. In an independent cohort of BL, the system was validated by stratifying patients with different survival outcomes.
Conclusion
Serum β2-microglobulin level is an independent prognostic factor for BL patients. The proposed β2-microglobulin–based classification system could stratify patients with distinct survival outcomes, which may help define appropriate treatment approaches for individual patients.
Key words: Burkitt lymphoma, β2-microglobulin, Prognosis, Risk stratification

Introduction

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma of B cell origin that features highly aggressive biological and clinical behavior [1,2]. The molecular hallmark of BL is a MYC translocation, which results in an extremely high rate of cellular proliferation. BL is highly sensitive to chemotherapy and can potentially be cured with high-intensity chemotherapy regimens [1,2].

Despite the highly aggressive biological behavior of BL, the patterns of disease involvement and clinical course show substantial heterogeneity [1–4]. Population-based studies have identified several risk factors for a poor outcome among patients with BL, such as older age, advanced stage, African ancestry, poor performance status (PS), and high levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [5–9]. A recent multicenter study reported age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS, LDH, and central nervous system involvement as independent prognostic factors for the survival outcomes of patients with BL [6]. Based on the known prognostic factors, risk-adapted treatment approaches with dose adjustment have been proposed to effectively treat high-risk patients with dose-intensified regimens while minimizing treatment-related toxicities in low-risk patients by reducing the chemotherapeutic dose intensity [10,11]. In this strategy, the stage of the disease, serum LDH levels, ECOG PS, and the presence of bulky disease are taken into consideration to classify patients into low- and high-risk groups. However, the absence of a validated prognostic scoring system for patients with BL warrants further investigation into additional prognostic factors and the development of risk-stratifying models for these patients.

β2-microglobulin is a small protein that is an essential part of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, and its serum levels can be elevated under various pathologic conditions. Elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels have been shown to be associated with poor clinical outcomes in various types of lymphoma [12–14], suggesting potential biological roles in the development and progression of lymphomatous disease. In particular, the β2-microglobulin level was shown to be a strong prognostic factor in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma [15]. However, the prognostic value of β2-microglobulin has not been specifically investigated in patients with BL.

In this study, using two independent BL cohorts, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of β2-microglobulin and to propose a risk-stratifying classification based on serum β2-microglobulin levels.

Materials and Methods

1. Study patients and diagnosis of BL

The study patients were identified from a prospective registry of lymphoma patients at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) (Asan Lymphoma Registry). Between May 2004 and March 2020, 103 patients were diagnosed as having BL based on both histologic and immunophenotypic findings. After excluding patients with no baseline serum β2-microglobulin value (n=10) and those who did not receive dose-intensive or effective dose-adjusted chemotherapies (n=12), 81 patients were included as the main study population (training cohort). Data such as patient characteristics and survival outcomes were obtained from the prospectively collected database and electronic medical record system of the institution.

The validation cohort was constructed based on 60 BL patients who were treated with intensive chemotherapy regimens and had a baseline serum β2-microglobulin value recorded at Samsung Medical Center between February 2000 and December 2019.

The diagnosis of BL was confirmed by experienced pathologists from each institution (C.S.P., J.H., and Y.H.K) based on morphological characteristics and immunohistochemical features, including CD10, CD20, Bcl-6, Bcl-2, and Ki-67 expression. Chromosomal translocations such as t(8;14), t(8;22), and t(2;8), and c-Myc overexpression, were assessed based on karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

2. Chemotherapy regimens

The dose-intensive or dose-adjusted chemotherapy regimens used were as follows: (1) brief-duration high-intensity chemotherapy regimen consisting of one cycle of cyclophosphamide and prednisone followed by cycles containing ifosfamide; high-dose methotrexate, vincristine, dexamethasone, and either doxorubicin or etoposide/cytarabine; or intrathecal triple therapy (B-NHL) [16]; (2) hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone with rituximab (R-HyperCVAD) [17] or without rituximab (HyperCVAD); (3) dose-adjusted infusional etoposide, doxorubicin, and vincristine with prednisone, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) [18]; (4) cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin and high-dose methotrexate (COPADM); and (5) the LMB protocol where COPADM is delivered in the induction phase, and the consolidation phase is maintained with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine [19].

3. Serum β2-microglobulin levels

Serum β2-microglobulin values were obtained as part of regular clinical practice for lymphoma staging work-up. Serum β2-microglobulin was measured using a radioimmunoassay kit (Immunotech, Inc., Prague, Czech Republic). The kit manufacturer defined the upper normal limit of serum β2-microglobulin as 2.5 mg/L.

4. Classification of risk groups

The low-risk group was defined as patients having stage I/II disease, normal LDH levels, ECOG PS of ≤ 1, and non-bulky disease (tumor mass with a diameter of < 7 cm) [11], whereas the high-risk group was defined as patients who did not meet the low-risk group criteria [10,11].

5. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R software ver. 3.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time interval from the time of initial diagnosis (index date) to the date of disease progression [20] or death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval between the index date and the date of death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes, and the log-rank test was used to compare these survival outcomes among the subgroups. The maximal chi-square method was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of serum β2-microglobulin that best segregated the PFS outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS and OS were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. The examined variables included serum β2-microglobulin levels, age, sex, and previously known prognostic factors for BL, such as age, sex, stage, serum LDH levels, presence of bulky disease, and ECOG PS. In multivariate analyses, variables with a potential relationship (p < 0.05) in the univariate analyses were included. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

1. Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics of 81 study patients with BL in the training cohort are summarized in Table 1. Their median age was 47 years (range, 16 to 82 years), and 57 patients (70.4%) were male. There were nine (11.1%), 56 (61.5%), 14 (17.3%), and two (2.5%) patients with an ECOG PS of 0, 1, 2, and 3 or 4, respectively. In addition, two patients (2.5%) were infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Stage IV disease (n=62, 76.5%) was the most prevalent, followed by stage I (n=10, 12.3%), stage II (n=8, 9.9%), and stage III (n=1, 1.2%). The majority of patients (n=65, 80.2%) were classified as the high-risk group, and 16 (19.8%) patients were classified as the low-risk group. Median serum LDH and β2-microglobulin levels were 395 IU/L (range, 139 to 18,822 IU/L) and 2.3 mg/dL (range, 0.76 to 22.2 mg/dL), respectively. All of the study patients received dose-intensive or effective dose-adjusted chemotherapies; B-NHL was the most frequently used regimen (n=37, 45.7%), followed by R-HyperCVAD (n=28, 34.6%) and DA-EPOCH-R (n=16, 19.8%).

Patients in the validation cohort had comparable baseline characteristics. The chemotherapy regimens used for the patients in the validation cohort were as follows: R-HyperCVAD (n=29, 48.3%), LMB protocol (n=25, 41.7%), COPADM (n=4, 6.7%), and HyperCVAD (n=2, 3.3%).

2. Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes according to the serum β2-microglobulin levels

We first compared the clinical outcomes of the study patients according to risk groups. There was no significant difference in the treatment regimens between the low-risk and high-risk groups (p=0.239) (S1 Table). In comparison with the low-risk group, the high-risk group showed a trend toward a shorter PFS and OS (p=0.084 and p=0.130, respectively) (Fig. 1A).

We examined the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the subgroups of BL patients according to their serum β2-microglobulin levels (Table 2). In this regard, we adopted a hot-spot cut-off value of 2 mg/L that best segregated the PFS outcomes. Patients with higher levels of serum β2-microglobulin (the high-B2MG group) were significantly older than those with lower levels (the low-B2MG group) (median age, 53 vs. 38.5 years; p=0.014). The proportion of patients with bulky disease was comparable between the two groups. However, the high-B2MG group had significantly more patients with elevated serum LDH (82.0% vs. 45.2%, p=0.001) and stage III/IV disease (92.0% vs. 51.6%, p < 0.001) (Table 2).

A comparison of the survival outcomes of the entire cohort revealed the significantly shorter PFS and OS of the high-B2MG group (p=0.002 and p=0.001, respectively) compared with the low-B2MG group (Fig. 1B). When the study patients were further classified based on their different β2-microglobulin levels (i.e., β2-microglobulin ≤ 2.0 mg/L; 2.0 mg/L < β2-microglobulin ≤ 2.5 mg/L; and β2-microglobulin > 2.5 mg/L), patients with a β2-microglobulin level of > 2.0 mg/L but ≤ 2.5 mg/L had a PFS and OS that were comparable to those with a β2-microglobulin level of > 2.5 mg/L, but inferior to those with a β2-microglobulin level of < 2.0 mg/L (S2 Fig.).

3. Survival outcomes of patients in the low- and high-risk groups according to their serum β2-microglobulin levels

In the low-risk group, 12 patients (75.0%) had low serum β2-microglobulin levels (≤ 2 mg/L), whereas four patients (25.0%) had high serum β2-microglobulin levels (> 2 mg/L). In the high-risk group, 46 patients (70.8%) had low serum β2-microglobulin levels, whereas 19 patients (29.2%) had high serum β2-microglobulin levels. In the low-risk group, patients with β2-microglobulin levels of > 2 mg/L had significantly shorter PFS and OS (Fig. 2A) (p=0.010 and p=0.001, respectively). Notably, neither disease progression nor death events were observed in the low-risk group among patients with low serum β2-microglobulin levels (≤ 2 mg/L). Similarly, in the high-risk group, high serum β2-microglobulin levels (> 2 mg/L) were associated with a significantly shorter PFS and OS (Fig. 2B) (p=0.044 and p=0.026, respectively). When we compared survival outcomes between low-risk patients with elevated serum β2-microglobulin and high-risk patients, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS (p=0.730 and p=0.530, respectively) (Fig. 2C). PFS and OS were also comparable among patients who received different chemotherapy regimens (p=0.760 and p=0.940, respectively).

4. Multivariate analyses for PFS and OS

We performed Cox regression analyses for PFS and OS (Table 3). Multivariate analyses revealed that a serum β2-microglobulin level of > 2 mg/L was independently associated with a shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 12.45; p=0.047) and OS (HR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.04 to 20.85; p=0.043). Older age (> 65 years) was marginally associated with a shorter PFS (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 0.98 to 6.01; p=0.055), whereas poor PS (ECOG PS ≥ 2) was an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS (HR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.89 to 10.02; p < 0.001). Both older age (> 65 years) and poor PS (ECOG PS ≥ 2) were independently associated with a shorter OS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.17 to 7.79; p=0.021 and HR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.84 to 10.99; p < 0.001, respectively).

5. Proposal of a novel risk stratification classification incorporating serum β2-microglobulin

Considering the ability of serum β2-microglobulin levels to stratify BL patients with distinct clinical outcomes, we proposed a new risk stratification classification system with distinct survival outcomes (Fig. 3A): (1) a low-risk group with serum β2-microglobulin levels of ≤ 2 mg/L with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 100% (95% CI, 100 to 100) and 100% (95% CI, 100 to 100), respectively (minimal risk subgroup); (2) a high-risk group with serum β2-microglobulin levels of ≤ 2 mg/L with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 83.1% (95% CI, 67.2 to 100) and 89.5% (95% CI, 76.7 to 100), respectively (the intermediate risk subgroup), and (3) any-risk group with serum β2-microglobulin levels of > 2 mg/L with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 59.0% (95% CI, 46.6 to 74.7) and 62.5% (95% CI, 50 to 78.2), respectively (the highest risk subgroup). Patients in the three new risk subgroups showed statistically different PFS and OS (p < 0.01 for both).

To validate the generalizability of our classification system, we used it for patients in the validation cohort (Fig. 3B). Similarly, the system was able to stratify patients with different PFS and OS (p=0.036 and p=0.026, respectively). Patients in the minimal, intermediate, and highest risk subgroups showed 5-year PFS rates of 100% (95% CI, 100 to 100), 85.1% (95% CI, 68.3 to 100), and 48.7% (95% CI, 35.1 to 67.5), respectively. The 5-year OS rates for the minimal, intermediate, and highest risk subgroups were 100% (95% CI, 100 to 100), 92.9% (95% CI, 80.3 to 100), and 53.9% (95% CI, 40.2 to 72.3), respectively.

Discussion

In the current study, we investigated the clinical value of serum β2-microglobulin for the risk stratification of BL patients. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to highlight the level of serum β2-microglobulin as a robust prognosticator for patients with BL. Our β2-microglobulin-based stratification of risk subgroups raises an important question regarding the application of dose adjustment of chemotherapy for patients with BL. The clinical value of this study is considerably improved by the validation of our risk-stratifying system in an independent cohort.

The prognostic value of serum β2-microglobulin has been widely investigated in various types of lymphoproliferative disorders such as extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma [13], non-gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma [14], follicular lymphoma [21], diffuse large B cell lymphoma [22], Hodgkin lymphoma [23], and multiple myeloma [24]. Owing to its robustness as a prognosticator, serum β2-microglobulin has been incorporated into the prognostic staging system for multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma [21,24]. In agreement with these findings, serum β2-microglobulin was found to be an independent prognosticator in our BL cohort.

The exact mechanism linking β2-microglobulin to the poor clinical outcomes of patients with various lymphoproliferative diseases remains poorly understood. In our analyses, high serum β2-microglobulin levels were associated with a more advanced disease status and reflected a higher tumor burden represented by elevated serum LDH. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies showing an association between elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels and a higher tumor burden [13,25]. Notably, the cut-off value of β2-microglobulin was 2.0 mg/L (identified as the best prognostic segregator in the training cohort), which was lower than the upper normal limit of serum β2-microglobulin (2.5 mg/L). This suggests that only a slight increase in the β2-microglobulin value may reflect the aggressive biological and clinical features of BL. Indeed, patients with a β2-microglobulin level of > 2.0 mg/L but ≤ 2.5 mg/L showed survival outcomes comparable to those with a β2-microglobulin level of > 2.5 mg/L, but inferior to those with a β2-microglobulin level of < 2.0 mg/L. These results suggest that adopting a β2-microglobulin cut-off of 2.0 mg/L would be more reasonable in terms of stratifying BL patients with distinct survival outcomes. Unlike LDH, for which the upper normal limit varies widely due to different assay methods yielding different results, the quantification of β2-microglobulin levels is generally considered standardized. Indeed, the International Staging System for the staging of multiple myeloma adopts β2-microglobulin levels as a continuous variable [24] with cut-off values of 3.5 mg/L and 5.5 mg/L, rather than the upper normal limit (2.5 mg/L). Nevertheless, our cut-off value of 2 mg/L will need to be further validated in cohorts from other institutions employing different β2-microglobulin assay methods.

Importantly, our study demonstrated the ability of serum β2-microglobulin levels to further stratify the clinical outcomes of patients in addition to known risk stratification criteria that were originally developed for selecting different chemotherapeutic dose intensities [11,26]. The risk-stratifying criteria were proposed based on the International Prognostic Index and the presence of bulky disease [26]. Subsequently, a recent phase 2 study of risk-adapted DA-EPOCH-R adopted this classification system for patient stratification and allocation to different chemotherapeutic intensities [11]. Although each factor comprising this risk-stratifying criterion was shown to be prognostic in patients with BL [5–9], to our knowledge, the validity of the previously suggested system has not been thoroughly confirmed as a robust prognostic index for BL patients. Since the chemotherapy regimens were not significantly different between the different risk groups based on the previously suggested criteria, no definite difference in our study in the survival outcomes of patient subgroups based on these criteria indicates that they have room for improvement. Our results suggest that additional incorporation of the β2-microglobulin level may be one of the feasible options to improve the risk stratification of BL patients.

Our results showed that patients in the low-risk group with elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels exhibited clinical outcomes comparable to those of patients in the high-risk group, suggesting that extreme caution should be taken when treating these patients. Therefore, additional studies are required to confirm whether serum β2-microglobulin levels are elevated in low-risk group patients with poor clinical outcomes in other BL cohorts. This is important given that a fair proportion (25%) of patients in our study in the low-risk group had elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels. On the other hand, serum β2-microglobulin was able to significantly stratify patients in the high-risk group in terms of PFS and OS. This suggests that high-risk group patients with low serum β2-microglobulin levels may be treated with less intense chemotherapeutic regimens, which may lead to reduced acute treatment-related morbidities such as severe myelosuppression or long-term sequelae such as cognitive dysfunction, secondary malignancy, and disabling neuropathy [27,28].

Considering the strong prognostic impact of serum β2-microglobulin levels, we proposed a new classification system that could stratify patients into three distinct risk subgroups with 5-year OS rates of 100%, 89.5%, and 62.5%. Importantly, the risk-stratifying ability of our system was well validated in an independent cohort, with 5-year OS rates of 100%, 92.9%, and 53.9% for the risk subgroups. Our newly proposed risk-stratifying system should be further investigated in the context of risk-adapted therapy with dose adjustment. The optimization of therapeutic strategies, including the chemotherapeutic regimen and dose intensity for the re-classified patients (i.e., the low-risk group with elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels and the high-risk group with low serum β2-microglobulin levels) is a topic of particular interest. From a practical point of view, the level of serum β2-microglobulin is easily determined with excellent reproducibility, and our results suggest that serum β2-microglobulin level measurements in daily practice may guide treatment decisions and the prediction of clinical outcomes. However, the retrospective nature of our study and the relatively small number of patients, may limit the interpretation and generalizability of our data.

In conclusion, the serum β2-microglobulin level is an independent prognostic factor, which allows for further risk stratification of BL patients. This risk-stratifying classification system incorporating the serum β2-microglobulin level may be useful in stratifying BL patients with distinct survival outcomes. This classification system warrants further investigation in future studies dealing with the issue of applying risk-adapted treatment approaches with dose adjustment.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at Cancer Research and Treatment website (https://www.e-crt.org).

crt-2020-1060-suppl1.pdf

crt-2020-1060-suppl2.pdf

NOTES

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) (No.2020-1229). Informed consent from the patients was waived.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Kim HD, Suh C.

Collected the data: Kim HD, Cho H, Kim S, Lee K, Kang EH, Park JS, Park CS, Huh J, Ryu JS, Lee SW, Yoon DH, Kim SJ, Ko YH, Kim WS, Suh C.

Contributed data or analysis tools: Kim HD, Cho H, Suh C.

Performed the analysis: Kim HD, Suh C.

Wrote the paper: Kim HD, Suh C.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Fig. 1

Survival outcomes according to risk groups and serum β2-microglobulin (B2M) levels: progression-free survival and overall survival according to risk groups (A) and serum B2M levels (B).

Fig. 2

Survival outcomes of patients with different serum β2-microglobulin (B2M) levels in different risk groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival according to the serum B2M levels in the low-risk group (A) and high-risk group (B). (C) Survival outcomes were compared between low-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of > 2.0 mg/L and high-risk group patients.

Fig. 3

Survival outcomes in subgroups determined by a novel serum β2-microglobulin (B2M)–based risk stratification system. Progression-free survival and overall survival of low-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of ≤ 2 mg/L, high-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of ≤ 2 mg/L, and any-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of > 2 mg/L in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B).

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the patients

Variable	Training cohort (n=81)	Validation cohort (n=60)
Age (yr)	47 (16–82)	52.5 (18–84)
Age > 65 yr	13 (16.0)	10 (16.7)
Male sex	57 (70.4)	42 (70)
ECOG PS
0	9 (11.1)	10 (16.7)
1	56 (61.5)	31 (51.7)
2	14 (17.3)	19 (31.6)
3/4	2 (2.5)	0
HIV infection	2 (2.5)	2 (3.6)^a)
Stage
I	10 (12.3)	6 (10.0)
II	8 (9.9)	9 (15.0)
III	1 (1.2)	5 (8.3)
IV	62 (76.5)	40 (66.7)
Bulky disease	7 (8.6)	1 (1.7)
Risk group
Low	16 (19.8)	9 (15.0)
High	65 (80.2)	51 (85.0)
LDH > UNL	55 (67.9)	45 (75.0)
β2-microglobulin (mg/dL)	2.3 (0.76–22.2)	2.7 (1.11–22.5)

Values are presented as median (range) or number (%). ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance status; UNL, upper normal limit.

^a) Data of 56 patients were available.

Table 2

Clinical characteristics according to serum B2MG levels

Variable	Low-B2MG group (n=31)	High-B2MG group (n=50)	p-value
Age (yr)	38.5 (28.5–47.5)	53.0 (30.0–64.0)	0.014
Male sex	20 (64.5)	37 (74.0)	0.510
Bulky disease	2 (6.5)	5 (10.0)	0.844
Risk group			0.002
Low	12 (38.7)	4 (8.0)
High	19 (61.3)	46 (92.0)
LDH > UNL	14 (45.2)	41 (82.0)	0.001
ECOG PS ≥ 2	1 (3.2)	15 (30.0)	0.008
Stage III/IV	16 (51.6)	46 (92.0)	< 0.001

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%). B2MG, β2-microglobulin; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance status; UNL, upper normal limit.

Table 3

Factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival

Variable	Progression-free survival				Overall survival

	Univariate		Multivariate		Univariate		Multivariate

	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value
B2MG > 2 mg/dL	5.65 (1.69–18.90)	0.005	3.56 (1.02–12.45)	0.047	7.66 (1.79–32.82)	0.006	4.66 (1.04–20.85)	0.043

Age > 65 yr	2.68 (1.11–6.45)	< 0.001	2.43 (0.98–6.01)	0.055	3.33 (1.34–8.26)	0.010	3.02 (1.17–7.79)	0.021

Male sex	0.91 (0.39–2.12)	0.833	-	-	0.77 (0.32–1.83)	0.548	-	-

Stage III/IV	4.50 (10.06–19.11)	0.042	-	-	3.80 (0.89–16.27)	0.072	-	-

LDH > UNL	2.33 (0.87–6.20)	0.092	-	-	2.64 (0.89–7.81)	0.080	-	-

Bulky disease	0.95 (0.22–4.03)	0.095	-	-	1.10 (0.26–4.72)	0.896	-	-

ECOG PS ≥ 2	5.64 (2.54–12.53)	< 0.001	4.35 (1.89–10.02)	< 0.001	5.90 (2.52–13.82)	< 0.001	4.50 (1.84–10.99)	< 0.001

B2MG, β2-microglobulin; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR, hazards ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance status; UNL, upper normal limit.

REFERENCES

1. Perkins AS, Friedberg JW. Burkitt lymphoma in adults. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008;341–8. Article PubMed
2. Kalisz K, Alessandrino F, Beck R, Smith D, Kikano E, Ramaiya NH, et al. An update on Burkitt lymphoma: a review of pathogenesis and multimodality imaging assessment of disease presentation, treatment response, and recurrence. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:56.Article PubMed PMC
3. Hwang I, Go H, Jeon YK, Ko YH, Yoon DH, Suh C, et al. Expression of JL1 in Burkitt lymphoma is associated with improved overall survival. Virchows Arch. 2011;459:353–9. Article PubMed
4. Jang SJ, Yoon DH, Kim S, Yoon S, Kim DY, Park CS, et al. A unique pattern of extranodal involvement in Korean adults with sporadic Burkitt lymphoma: a single center experience. Ann Hematol. 2012;91:1917–22. Article PubMed
5. Wästerlid T, Jonsson B, Hagberg H, Jerkeman M. Population based study of prognostic factors and treatment in adult Burkitt lymphoma: a Swedish Lymphoma Registry study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011;52:2090–6. Article PubMed
6. Evens AM, Danilov AV, Jagadeesh D, Sperling AL, Kim SH, Vaca RA, et al. Burkitt lymphoma in the modern era: real world outcomes and prognostication across 30 US cancer centers. Blood. 2021;137:374–386. Article PubMed PMC PDF
7. Jakobsen LH, Ellin F, Smeland KB, Wasterlid T, Christensen JH, Jorgensen JM, et al. Minimal relapse risk and early normalization of survival for patients with Burkitt lymphoma treated with intensive immunochemotherapy: an international study of 264 real-world patients. Br J Haematol. 2020;189:661–71. Article PubMed
8. Castillo JJ, Winer ES, Olszewski AJ. Population-based prognostic factors for survival in patients with Burkitt lymphoma: an analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer. 2013;119:3672–9. Article PubMed
9. Sweetenham JW, Pearce R, Taghipour G, Blaise D, Gisselbrecht C, Goldstone AH. Adult Burkitt’s and Burkitt-like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: outcome for patients treated with high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in first remission or at relapse: results from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2465–72. Article PubMed
10. Mead GM, Barrans SL, Qian W, Walewski J, Radford JA, Wolf M, et al. A prospective clinicopathologic study of dose-modified CODOX-M/IVAC in patients with sporadic Burkitt lymphoma defined using cytogenetic and immunophenotypic criteria (MRC/NCRI LY10 trial). Blood. 2008;112:2248–60. Article PubMed PMC
11. Roschewski M, Dunleavy K, Abramson JS, Powell BL, Link BK, Patel P, et al. Multicenter study of risk-adapted therapy with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in adults with untreated Bur-kitt lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2519–29. Article PubMed PMC
12. Chronowski GM, Wilder RB, Tucker SL, Ha CS, Sarris AH, Hagemeister FB, et al. An elevated serum beta-2-microglobulin level is an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with early-stage Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 2002;95:2534–8. Article PubMed
13. Yoo C, Yoon DH, Jo JC, Yoon S, Kim S, Lee BJ, et al. Prognostic impact of beta-2 microglobulin in patients with extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2014;93:995–1000. Article PubMed
14. Yoo C, Yoon DH, Yoon S, Kim S, Huh J, Park CJ, et al. Prognostic impact of beta(2)-microglobulin in patients with non-gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56:688–93. PubMed
15. Johnson PW, Whelan J, Longhurst S, Stepniewska K, Matthews J, Amess J, et al. Beta-2 microglobulin: a prognostic factor in diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:792–7. Article PubMed PMC
16. Lee EJ, Petroni GR, Schiffer CA, Freter CE, Johnson JL, Barcos M, et al. Brief-duration high-intensity chemotherapy for patients with small noncleaved-cell lymphoma or FAB L3 acute lymphocytic leukemia: results of cancer and leukemia group B study 9251. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4014–22. Article PubMed
17. Thomas DA, Faderl S, O’Brien S, Bueso-Ramos C, Cortes J, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with hyper-CVAD plus rituximab for the treatment of adult Burkitt and Burkitt-type lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2006;106:1569–80. Article PubMed
18. Dunleavy K, Pittaluga S, Shovlin M, Steinberg SM, Cole D, Grant C, et al. Low-intensity therapy in adults with Burkitt’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1915–25. Article PubMed PMC
19. Choi MK, Jun HJ, Lee SY, Kim KH, Lim DH, Kim K, et al. Treatment outcome of adult patients with Burkitt lymphoma: results using the LMB protocol in Korea. Ann Hematol. 2009;88:1099–106. Article PubMed
20. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–68. Article PubMed PMC
21. Federico M, Bellei M, Marcheselli L, Luminari S, Lopez-Guillermo A, Vitolo U, et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index 2: a new prognostic index for follicular lymphoma developed by the international follicular lymphoma prognostic factor project. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4555–62. Article PubMed
22. Lopez-Guillermo A, Colomo L, Jimenez M, Bosch F, Villamor N, Arenillas L, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: clinical and biological characterization and outcome according to the nodal or extranodal primary origin. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2797–804. Article PubMed
23. Vassilakopoulos TP, Nadali G, Angelopoulou MK, Siakantaris MP, Dimopoulou MN, Kontopidou FN, et al. The prognostic significance of beta(2)-microglobulin in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Haematologica. 2002;87:701–8. PubMed
24. Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2863–9. Article PubMed PMC
25. Constantinides IP, Pathouli C, Karvountzis G, Papadopoulos P, Varvoutsi-Constantinides M, Eliakis P, et al. Serum beta 2 microglobulin in malignant lymphoproliferative disorders. Cancer. 1985;55:2384–9. Article PubMed
26. Mead GM, Sydes MR, Walewski J, Grigg A, Hatton CS, Pescosta N, et al. An international evaluation of CODOX-M and CODOX-M alternating with IVAC in adult Burkitt’s lymphoma: results of United Kingdom Lymphoma Group LY06 study. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1264–74. Article PubMed
27. Rizzieri DA, Johnson JL, Niedzwiecki D, Lee EJ, Vardiman JW, Powell BL, et al. Intensive chemotherapy with and without cranial radiation for Burkitt leukemia and lymphoma: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9251. Cancer. 2004;100:1438–48. Article PubMed
28. Neglia JP, Friedman DL, Yasui Y, Mertens AC, Hammond S, Stovall M, et al. Second malignant neoplasms in five-year survivors of childhood cancer: childhood cancer survivor study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:618–29. Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Prognostic Factors for Survival in Adults With Burkitt Lymphoma: A Systematic Review
Aythami de Armas‐Castellano, Diego Infante‐Ventura, Tasmania del Pino‐Sedeño, Yadira González Hernández, Raul Quiros, Beatriz León‐Salas, Vincent Ribrag, María M. Trujillo‐Martín
Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The clinical significance and prognostic value of serum beta-2 microglobulin in adult lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a multicenter analysis of 326 patients
Ze Jin, Yi Miao, Jie Zhang, Jing Zhang, Chunling Wang, Xuzhang Lu, Yuqing Miao, Miao Sun, Yunping Zhang, Yun Zhuang, Haiwen Ni, Jingyan Xu, Wanchuan Zhuang, Min Zhao, Jianfeng Zhu, Min Xu, Guoqiang Lin, Haiying Hua, Xiaoyan Xie, Maozhong Xu, Tao Jia, Liji
Annals of Hematology.2024; 103(7): 2257. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics in Extranodal Nasal-Type NK/T Cell Lymphoma
Yu Luo, Zhun Huang, Zihan Gao, Bingbing Wang, Yanwei Zhang, Yan Bai, Qingxia Wu, Meiyun Wang
Korean Journal of Radiology.2024; 25(2): 189. CrossRef
The Role of Beta2-Microglobulin in Central Nervous System Disease
Zhen-Yuan Liu, Feng Tang, Jin-Zhou Yang, Xi Chen, Ze-Fen Wang, Zhi-Qiang Li
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Serum beta2-microglobulin acts as a biomarker for severity and prognosis in glioma patients: a preliminary clinical study
Zhen-Yuan Liu, Feng Tang, Jing Wang, Jin-Zhou Yang, Xi Chen, Ze-Fen Wang, Zhi-Qiang Li
BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Serum beta2-microglobulin and peripheral blood eosinophils for the assessment of severity and prognosis with omicron variant COVID-19 infection
Jie Tan, Hanxi Fang, Xiao Hu, Ming Yue, Junling Yang
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A novel inflammation-related prognostic model for predicting the overall survival of primary central nervous system lymphoma: A real-world data analysis
Zhentian Wu, Chenyi Wang, Yao Lyu, Zheshen Lin, Ming Lu, Shixiong Wang, Bingxuan Wang, Na Yang, Yeye Li, Jianhong Wang, Xiaohui Duan, Na Zhang, Jing Gao, Yuan Zhang, Miaowang Hao, Zhe Wang, Guangxun Gao, Rong Liang
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Beta2-microglobulin is a valuable marker and identifies a poor-prognosis subgroup among intermediate-risk patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Ning-Chun Chen, Hung Chang, Hsiao-Wen Kao, Che-Wei Ou, Ming-Chung Kuo, Po-Nan Wang, Tung-Liang Lin, Jin-Hou Wu, Yu-Shin Hung, Yi-Jiun Su, Yuen-Chin Ong, Hsuan-Jen Shih
Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2023; 23(7): 3759. CrossRef
Tuberculosis combined with Burkitt lymphoma in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report and literature review
Jian-Nan Hu, Mu-Qing Yu, Li-Juan Hua, Chen Bao, Qian Liu, Chao Liu, Zi-Ling Li, Xi Wang, Shu-Yun Xu
Medicine.2023; 102(18): e33671. CrossRef
Elevated serum beta-2 microglobulin level predicts short-term poor prognosis of patients with de novo acute omicron variant COVID-19 infection
Shengping Gong, Ruishuang Ma, Ting Zhu, Xiaoqin Ge, Rongrong Xie, Qingsong Tao, Cong Shi
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
An Externally Validated Nomogram for Predicting the Overall Survival of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Based on Clinical Characteristics and Systemic Inflammatory Markers
Yajiao Liu, Li Sheng, Haiying Hua, Jingfen Zhou, Ying Zhao, Bei Wang
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic significance of serum β2-microglobulin levels in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified
Hyung-Don Kim, Hyungwoo Cho, Byeong Seok Sohn, Chan-Sik Park, Jooryung Huh, Jin Sook Ryu, Sang-Wook Lee, Sang Eun Yoon, Seok Jin Kim, Young Hyeh Ko, Won Seog Kim, Cheolwon Suh
Leukemia & Lymphoma.2022; 63(1): 124. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Burkitt Lymphoma Using Serum β2-microglobulin Levels

Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(3):847-856. Published online December 17, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1060

XML Download

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Electronic Supplementary Material
NOTES
REFERENCES

Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Burkitt Lymphoma Using Serum β2-microglobulin Levels

Fig. 1 Survival outcomes according to risk groups and serum β2-microglobulin (B2M) levels: progression-free survival and overall survival according to risk groups (A) and serum B2M levels (B).

Fig. 2 Survival outcomes of patients with different serum β2-microglobulin (B2M) levels in different risk groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival according to the serum B2M levels in the low-risk group (A) and high-risk group (B). (C) Survival outcomes were compared between low-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of > 2.0 mg/L and high-risk group patients.

Fig. 3 Survival outcomes in subgroups determined by a novel serum β2-microglobulin (B2M)–based risk stratification system. Progression-free survival and overall survival of low-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of ≤ 2 mg/L, high-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of ≤ 2 mg/L, and any-risk group patients with serum B2M levels of > 2 mg/L in the training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B).

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Burkitt Lymphoma Using Serum β2-microglobulin Levels

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the patients

Variable	Training cohort (n=81)	Validation cohort (n=60)
Age (yr)	47 (16–82)	52.5 (18–84)
Age > 65 yr	13 (16.0)	10 (16.7)
Male sex	57 (70.4)	42 (70)
ECOG PS
0	9 (11.1)	10 (16.7)
1	56 (61.5)	31 (51.7)
2	14 (17.3)	19 (31.6)
3/4	2 (2.5)	0
HIV infection	2 (2.5)	2 (3.6)^a)
Stage
I	10 (12.3)	6 (10.0)
II	8 (9.9)	9 (15.0)
III	1 (1.2)	5 (8.3)
IV	62 (76.5)	40 (66.7)
Bulky disease	7 (8.6)	1 (1.7)
Risk group
Low	16 (19.8)	9 (15.0)
High	65 (80.2)	51 (85.0)
LDH > UNL	55 (67.9)	45 (75.0)
β2-microglobulin (mg/dL)	2.3 (0.76–22.2)	2.7 (1.11–22.5)

^a)Data of 56 patients were available.

Table 2

Clinical characteristics according to serum B2MG levels

Variable	Low-B2MG group (n=31)	High-B2MG group (n=50)	p-value
Age (yr)	38.5 (28.5–47.5)	53.0 (30.0–64.0)	0.014
Male sex	20 (64.5)	37 (74.0)	0.510
Bulky disease	2 (6.5)	5 (10.0)	0.844
Risk group			0.002
Low	12 (38.7)	4 (8.0)
High	19 (61.3)	46 (92.0)
LDH > UNL	14 (45.2)	41 (82.0)	0.001
ECOG PS ≥ 2	1 (3.2)	15 (30.0)	0.008
Stage III/IV	16 (51.6)	46 (92.0)	< 0.001

Table 3

Factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival

Variable	Progression-free survival				Overall survival

	Univariate		Multivariate		Univariate		Multivariate

	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value
B2MG > 2 mg/dL	5.65 (1.69–18.90)	0.005	3.56 (1.02–12.45)	0.047	7.66 (1.79–32.82)	0.006	4.66 (1.04–20.85)	0.043

Age > 65 yr	2.68 (1.11–6.45)	< 0.001	2.43 (0.98–6.01)	0.055	3.33 (1.34–8.26)	0.010	3.02 (1.17–7.79)	0.021

Male sex	0.91 (0.39–2.12)	0.833	-	-	0.77 (0.32–1.83)	0.548	-	-

Stage III/IV	4.50 (10.06–19.11)	0.042	-	-	3.80 (0.89–16.27)	0.072	-	-

LDH > UNL	2.33 (0.87–6.20)	0.092	-	-	2.64 (0.89–7.81)	0.080	-	-

Bulky disease	0.95 (0.22–4.03)	0.095	-	-	1.10 (0.26–4.72)	0.896	-	-

ECOG PS ≥ 2	5.64 (2.54–12.53)	< 0.001	4.35 (1.89–10.02)	< 0.001	5.90 (2.52–13.82)	< 0.001	4.50 (1.84–10.99)	< 0.001

B2MG, β2-microglobulin; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR, hazards ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance status; UNL, upper normal limit.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the patients

Data of 56 patients were available.

Table 2 Clinical characteristics according to serum B2MG levels

Table 3 Factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival

B2MG, β2-microglobulin; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR, hazards ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance status; UNL, upper normal limit.