Clinical Significance of Pleural Attachment and Indentation of Subsolid Nodule Lung Cancer

Hyung-Jun Kim; Jun Yeun Cho; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Jin-Haeng Chung; Sukki Cho; Kwhanmien Kim; Kyung Won Lee; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee

doi:10.4143/crt.2019.057

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 51(4); 2019 > Article

Original Article Clinical Significance of Pleural Attachment and Indentation of Subsolid Nodule Lung Cancer: Hyung-Jun Kim, MD¹, Jun Yeun Cho, MD^2,3, Yeon Joo Lee, MD^2,3, Jong Sun Park, MD, PhD^2,3, Young-Jae Cho, MD, PhD^2,3, Ho Il Yoon, MD, PhD^2,3, Jin-Haeng Chung, MD, PhD⁴, Sukki Cho, MD, PhD⁵, Kwhanmien Kim, MD, PhD⁵, Kyung Won Lee, MD, PhD⁶, Jae Ho Lee, MD, PhD^2,3, Choon-Taek Lee, MD, PhD^2,3,; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2019;51(4):1540-1548.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.057
Published online: March 25, 2019

¹Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Daegu Hospital, Gyeongsan, Korea

²Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

³Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

⁴Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

⁵Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

⁶Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

Correspondence: Choon-Taek Lee, MD, PhD Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Respiratory Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea
Tel: 82-31-787-7002 Fax: 82-31-787-4052 E-mail: ctlee@snu.ac.kr

• Received: January 25, 2019 • Accepted: March 22, 2019

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

9,501 Views
212 Download
31 Web of Science
25 Crossref
39 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Electronic Supplementary Material
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
Lung cancers presenting as subsolid nodule commonly have peripheral location, making the cancer-pleura relationship noteworthy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of pleural attachment and/or indentation on visceral pleural invasion (VPI) and recurrence-free survival.
Materials and Methods
Patients who underwent curative resection of lung cancer as subsolid nodules from April 2007 to January 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. They were divided into four groups according to their relationship with the pleura. Clinical, radiographical, and pathological findings were analyzed.
Results
Among 404 patients with malignant subsolid nodule, 120 (29.7%) had neither pleural attachment nor indentation, 26 (6.4%) had attachment only, 117 (29.0%) had indentation only, and 141 (34.9%) had both. VPI was observed in nodules of 36 patients (8.9%), but absent in nonsolid nodules and in those without pleural attachment and/or indentation. Compared to subsolid nodules with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation, those with attachment only (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.98) and indentation only (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.31) revealed lower odds of VPI. On subgroup analysis, the size of the solid portion was associated with VPI among those with pleural attachment and indentation (p=0.021). Such high-risk features for VPI were associated with earlier lung cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.58 to 6.91).
Conclusion
Concurrent pleural attachment and indentation are risk factors for VPI, and the odds increase with larger solid portion in subsolid nodules. Considering the risk of recurrence, early surgical resection could be encouraged in these patients.
Key words: Lung neoplasms, Non-small-cell lung carcinoma, Pleura, Neoplasm invasiveness, Prognosis

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with incidence of up to 20.0-44.0 per 100,000 persons in Northern America and Western Europe [1]. Mortality rates are high, and the 5-year survival rate is reportedly 10%-20% [2]. To decrease such lethal consequences, lung cancer screening using low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) in selected patients has proven to reduce overall mortality [3]. Furthermore, such screening has increased the detection of malignant subsolid nodules (SSNs) [4]. Such SSNs require regular follow-up because malignancy rates can be even higher for these nodules than for solid nodules [4]. Although the risk of recurrence after resection is low for subsolid lung cancer [5], the median survival after recurrence is expected to be < 3 years [6]. Thus, identifying risk factors of recurrence is necessary for personalized treatment of patients.

Some factors, such as visceral pleural invasion (VPI), pathological tumor, node, and metastasis staging, lymphovascular invasion, and spread through air space, are associated with postoperative recurrence [7-9]. However, most of these factors can only be detected after a surgery is performed, making further resection difficult during surgery. Thus, it would be better if risk evaluation could be based on radiological findings performed before surgery.

SSNs, which are mostly composed of adenocarcinomas, are frequently found in the peripheral lungs. Therefore, the relationship between SSNs and the pleura is noteworthy. Linear pleural tags with soft tissue component at the pleural end on mediastinal window can predict VPI for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [10]. In contrast, studies of subsolid lung cancers have questioned the effect of indentation on VPI, although pleural contact is a significant factor of VPI [11,12]. The effect of pleura-SSN relationship on VPI, along with the effect on clinical prognoses, is not completely understood.

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of pleural attachment and/or indentation on postoperative outcomes, including VPI and recurrence-free survival, in subsolid lung cancers.

Materials and Methods

1. Study population

Patients who underwent lung resection for SSNs from April 2007 to January 2016 in a tertiary referral center were screened. Among them, solitary lung cancer patients and those with surgery of curative intention were selected. Patients were divided into the following four groups based on CT findings before surgery: with or without pleural attachment and/or indentation.

2. Patient assessment, treatment, and follow-up

Baseline demographics, such as sex, age, smoking status, comorbidities, and pulmonary function test results, were acquired from medical records. The location of lung cancer was identified based on preoperative CT findings. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the extent of surgery was determined by the attending surgeon. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were performed for high-risk patients with stage IB and IIA lung cancer or for those with pathological stage higher than IIB. After treatment, to detect recurrence, patients were followed up on 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals using chest CT.

3. Radiographic evaluation

Chest CT was performed using Brilliance 64 and iCT256 (Philips Medical System, Cleveland, OH). CT parameters were 120 kVp and 100-200 mA, and images were reconstructed with a 1-3-mm thickness. All CT scans were obtained with the patient in the supine position at full inspiration, and the latest CT study obtained before surgical resection was selected for analysis. The mediastinal window had a level of 45 Hounsfield units (HUs) and a width of 250 HU, while the lung window had a level of –500 HU and a width of 2,000 HU.

SSNs were classified as nonsolid nodules (NSNs; formerly pure ground glass opacity nodule) if the opacity disappeared on the mediastinal window, and as part-solid nodules (PSNs; formerly mixed ground glass opacity nodule) if it persisted. According to the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, PSNs with solid component ≥ 8 mm are considered to have a higher probability of malignancy and those with solid component ≤ 5 mm are considered to have lower probability. Regarding such recommendation, PSNs were divided into three groups: PSN with solid portion ≤ 5 mm, solid portion > 5 mm and < 8 mm, and solid portion ≥ 8 mm. The size of the solid portion was calculated as described in the NCCN guideline, i.e., by averaging the longest longitudinal length and largest diameter perpendicular to it.

Other radiographic findings, such as the longest diameter, distance from the pleura, pleural attachment, and indentation, were assessed in the lung window setting. Distance from the pleura was assessed by drawing a perpendicular line between the pleura and SSN, and the shortest distance was measured. SSN was defined to have a pleural attachment when the distance from the pleura was 0 mm. Pleural indentation was defined as linear areas of high attenuation originating from the SSN extending peripherally to contact the pleura [13,14]. When SSN was attached to the pleura, any distortions of the pleural architecture by SSN was also defined as pleural indentation and then defined as concurrent pleural attachment with indentation [12]. SSNs were divided into four groups according to the relationship with the pleura: neither pleural attachment nor indentation, pleural attachment without indentation, pleural indentation without attachment, and concurrent pleural attachment with indentation. The interpretation of the CT findings was done by an investigator who was not aware of any clinical information. The examples of the four groups are shown in Fig. 1.

4. Pathological evaluation

Pathological staging was retrospectively determined according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system [15]. T category was described in eight categories: T1a(mi) to T4; and N category in three categories: N0 to N2. When a lymph node was not evaluated either preoperatively or intraoperatively, it was considered Nx. The overall stage grouping was specified in eight categories (from IA1 to IIIB), in which stage IIIC and IV cancers were not included. Specimens obtained in the early phase of the study were reviewed to allocate them into proper stage according to the AJCC eighth edition. Pathological VPI was considered to be present when invasion beyond the elastic layer was observed [16]. Other pathological findings, such as vascular invasion and lymphatic invasion, were also recorded. An investigator blinded from any clinical information participated in the analysis of the pathological findings.

5. Statistical analysis

Baseline demographics and CT, pathological, and clinical findings were organized as numbers (%) for categorical variables using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables, Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed to describe the values in mean± standard variation or median (interquartile range [IQR]) according to their patterns of distribution. The pathological stage was grouped as T1, T2, and T3-4 for T category and as I, II, and III for overall stage group to compare the characteristics between patients with or without pleural attachment and/or indentation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to measure the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% percentile confidence interval (CI) of important radiographic predictors of VPI.

Furthermore, survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate predictors of lung cancer recurrence. Variables with p-values of < 0.1 were included in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were calculated.

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata ver. 13.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

6. Ethical statement

This study was conducted according to the amended Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (protocol number: B-1604-343-104). Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective design of the study; however, records and information of each patient were anonymized and de-identified before analysis.

Results

1. Patient selection and baseline characteristics

During the 9-year study period, 541 patients underwent lung resection surgery for SSNs, of whom, patients with multiple primary lung cancer (n=73), benign lesion (n=23), adenocarcinoma in situ (n=20), recurred case (n=8), malignancy other than lung cancer (n=5), distant metastasis (n=4), follow-up loss (n=2), N3 disease (n=1), and other coexisting malignancies in the resected specimen (n=1) were excluded. Finally, 404 patients were included. Neither pleural attachment nor indentation was observed in 120 patients (29.7%), pleural attachment without indentation in 26 (6.4%), pleural indentation without attachment in 117 (29.0%), and concurrent pleural attachment with indentation in 141 (34.9%). After surgery, pathological VPI was proven in 36 patients (8.9%). Thirty-four patients (8.4%) experienced lung cancer recurrence at the point of review (S1 Fig.).

Patients had a fairly even distribution of sex, with a mean age of 62.8 years. Patients without pleural attachment or attachment were younger than others (p=0.015). More than half of the patients (63.3%) were never smokers, with common comorbidities of hypertension (29.2%), diabetes mellitus (13.1%), and other malignancies within 5 years (12.1%). Chronic lung diseases, such as asthma (n=9), bronchiectasis (n=8), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=3), were observed in 19 patients (4.7%). Subsolid lung cancer was the commonest in the right upper lobe (38.9%), and concurrent pleural attachment with indentation was predominantly observed in the right middle lobe (10.6%). Pleural attachment and/or indentation were observed more frequently among those with PSNs and those with longer diameter. The extent of lung resection was not significantly different among the four groups (p=0.319), with lobectomy being the most common surgery performed (257 patients, 63.4%). Compared to sublobar resection such as wedge resection and segmentectomy, lobectomy was performed in patients with larger solid portion (p < 0.001), longer longitudinal diameter (median, 24 mm vs. 15 mm; p < 0.001), and when the SSN was located in right upper lobe or right middle lobe (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients who underwent lobectomy revealed higher rates of VPI compared to those of sublobar resection (11.3% vs. 4.8%, p=0.026), along with higher overall pathological stage (p < 0.001). Adjuvant therapy was performed in 27 of 404 patients (6.7%), which were more frequently performed among those with pleural attachment and indentation (7 among 141 patients, 12.0%) (Table 1).

2. Radiographic characteristics and pathological correlation

Pathology reports of postoperative lung specimen were reviewed. All patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, including invasive adenocarcinoma (n=332, 82.2%) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (n=72, 17.8%). VPI was observed in 36 patients (8.9%). SSNs with pleural attachment and indentation had higher association with VPI (31 of 141 patients, 22.0%) than those with attachment alone (1 of 26 patients, 3.9%), indentation alone (4 of 117 patients, 3.4%), and neither (0 of 120 patients, 0.0%) (p < 0.001). None of the NSNs had VPI, and those with larger solid portion (p < 0.001) and longer diameter (median, 27 mm vs. 19 mm; p < 0.001) had a higher probability of VPI (Table 2). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with meaningful factors associated with VPI. Compared with SSNs with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation, those with attachment only (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.98) and indentation only (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.31) revealed lower odds of VPI (Table 3).

Pathological staging according to the recent eighth AJCC recommendation was retrospectively performed. The pathological T category was higher among those with pleural attachment and/or indentation. Approximately 31.9% of the pati-ents with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation had at least T2 category, while only two patients (3.4%) with neither pleural attachment nor indentation had T2 category (p < 0.001). Vascular and lymphatic invasions were also more frequently observed in patients with pleural indentation than in those without it. Although pathological N category (p=0.235) did notreveal statistical difference according to pleural attachment and/or indentation, the overall pathological stage was higher with pleural attachment and indentation (p=0.038) (S2 Table).

Subgroup analysis of patients with the four different features of SSN-pleura relationship was performed, and the probability of VPI was calculated according to the size of the solid portion in each group. The size of the solid portion largerthan 5 mm was associated with VPI among PSNs with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation (p < 0.001), while it was not associated with VPI among other groups (Table 4). Patients with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation, along with solid portion > 5 mm, were categorized as “high risk of VPI” in the following survival analysis.

3. Differences in clinical outcomes

The median follow-up duration for the 404 patients was 48.3 months (IQR, 31.2 to 61.2). Clinical outcomes, such as lung cancer recurrence, and all-cause mortality were compared. Thirty-four patients (8.4%) experienced recurrence within a median of 26.2 months (IQR, 11.7 to 38.5), and 19 patients (4.7%) died in a median of 38.2 months (IQR, 24.4 to 50.1). Concurrent pleural attachment with indentation was associated with higher recurrence (15.6%) and all-cause mortality rate (7.1%) than those without any one of them (3.3% and 0.8%, respectively).

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test, which revealed that concurrent pleural attachment with indentation was associated with shorter time to recurrence in the subsolid lung cancers than in other groups (Fig. 2). With multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, smoking history (adjusted HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.35), “high risk of VPI” features (adjusted HR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.58 to 6.91), and longer diameter (adjusted HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.67 per cm) were significantly associated with earlier time to recurrence (S3 Table).

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study, pleural attachment and/or indentation was observed in more than two-thirds (284 patients) of the 404 patients who underwent curative surgery for subsolid lung cancer. Subsolid lung cancers with pleural attachment and/or indentation were observed in patients with older age and those with larger solid portion and longer diameter. Pleural attachment and/or indentation was not associated with the extent of surgery but was associated with more frequent adjuvant therapies. VPI was not observed in NSNs, while concurrent pleural attachment with indentation was assessed as an independent factor associated with VPI. The size of the solid portion > 5 mm was associated with higher risk of VPI among patients with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation. Time to lung cancer recurrence was shorter among patients with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation and solid portion > 5 mm.

In this study, the rates of pleural attachment (41.3%), indentation (63.9%), and VPI (8.9%) were comparable with those reported previously. Pleural attachment was reportedly present in 35.3%-62.2% and indentation in 19.8%-66.4% among subsolid lung adenocarcinomas [11,12]. The incidence of VPI among nonsolid lung adenocarcinomas is reportedly 0.0%-17.4% and that among part-solid lung adenocarcinoma is 10.0%-32.2% [7,11,12]. We found no VPI among NSNs but found 12.2% of VPI among PSNs.

This is the first study to demonstrate that concurrent pleural attachment with indentation was independently associated with VPI among subsolid lung cancers. Compared to simple attachment of SSN to the pleura, further indentation to the pleura is caused by a combination of two stepwise consequences: contractile change of the cancer and a compensatory enlargement of surrounding tissues to fill the territory between the areas of retracted visceral pleura [17]. Therefore, there exists a higher possibility that the cancer invaded the point of tagged visceral pleura. Pleural indentation has been universally considered a positive predictive factor for VPI and lymphovascular invasiveness in NSCLC, including solid cancers [10,18]. However, considering that chronic lung diseases, such as tuberculosis-destroyed lung, bronchiectasis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, may cause architectural distortion of the lung anatomy, indentation alone may not be relied upon as an independent risk factor for VPI, as shown previously [11]. Furthermore, most previous studies were focused on solid lung cancers. Subsolid lung cancers are considered to be less invasive compared to solid tumors and should be examined separately from solid lung cancers [5]. The importance of concurrent pleural attachment and indentation was previously suggested in a retrospective study of 194 NSCLC patients [19]. Pleural indentation with other additional relationships to the pleura leads to poorer outcomes compared with those with sole indentation.

In a subgroup of subsolid lung cancers with concurrent pleural attachment and indentation, larger solid portion (> 5 mm) was significantly associated with higher odds of VPI. A larger solid portion was reportedly an independent factor of VPI among PSNs, and NSNs do not show VPI, regardless of their relationship with the pleura [11,20,21]. The relationship with the pleura, presented as concurrent pleural attachment with indentation, should be emphasized as an independent factor for VPI, and if the solid portion is larger, a higher risk of VPI should be suspected.

In our study population, 8.4% of patients experienced recurrence of subsolid lung adenocarcinoma during a median 48.3 months of follow-up. The calculated 5-year RFS was 94.4% for patients with stage IA and 69.3% for those with stage higher stages. The RFS rates of stage IA are comparable with those reported in the previous study of subsolid lung adenocarcinomas [7].

VPI is a well-known significant risk factor for recurrence and poor outcomes of NSCLC [22-24]. In subsolid lung cancer, however, the effect of VPI on prognosis is still debated. From a retrospective study of 147 subsolid lung cancers without nodal metastasis, VPI was associated with RFS [7], but another retrospective study of 466 patients demonstrated similar RFS between the two groups [25]. In our study, pathological VPI was an independent factor for earlier recurrence of subsolid lung cancer (adjusted HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.84 to 8.15), and “high risk of VPI” feature, defined as concurrent pleural attachment and indentation with solid portion > 5 mm, was independently associated with earlier recurrence. Pleural indentation is associated with poor outcome among NSCLC [19]. Indentation increases the risk of invasion to the visceral pleura, in which lymphatic drainage is abundant, leading to a higher risk of tumor dissemination [26]. Pleural attachment is another known factor for locoregional recurrence after radiotherapy in NSCLC and poor survival in lung adenocarcinoma [27,28]. Therefore, the “high risk of VPI” feature is associated with higher risk of VPI, and it also increases the risk of recurrence, leading to poor prognosis after surgical resection. The recent NCCN guidelines for lung cancer screening and the statement from the Fleischner Society have also emphasized the importance of the size of the solid area > 5 mm as a higher risk of malignancy among subsolid lung cancers [29].

Despite the important findings above, this study had some limitations. First, this was a retrospective study performed at a single center. More studies from different centers are required for generalizability of the results. Second, we did not differentiate pleural invasion beyond the elastic layer (PL1) and invasion to the visceral pleural surface (PL2). Because the discrimination of PL1 and PL2 was performed at our center after September 2012, patients who underwent surgery before that time did not have appropriate pathological reports regarding the two. It must be recognized that prognostic difference may exist between PL1 and PL2 disease [30]. Third, the study period was long (9 years). The changing lung cancer staging systems and standards of care may have affected the recurrence rates. Furthermore, the follow-up durations of patients differ according to the time of the operation.

In conclusion, concurrent pleural attachment with indentation of subsolid lung cancer is an independent risk factor for VPI, and the odds of VPI were higher among those with solid portion > 5 mm. Furthermore, patients with such “high risk of VPI” features experienced earlier recurrence. Therefore, such high-risk findings should be recognized on preoperative CT scans, and earlier surgery could be recommended in these selected patients.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at Cancer Research and Treatment website (https://www.e-crt.org).

S1 Fig.

Flowchart of patients who underwent curative surgery for subsolid lung adenocarcinoma. CT, computed tomography.

crt-2019-057-suppl1.pdf

S2 Table.

Pathological findings of subsolid lung adenocarcinomas

crt-2019-057-suppl2.pdf

S3 Table.

Effect of clinical and radiographic factors on time to recurrence of subsolid lung adenocarcinomas

crt-2019-057-suppl3.pdf

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Acknowledgements

We deeply appreciate the members of the Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine for sharing their ideas and comments.

This study was supported by SNUBH grant (21-2018-055).

Fig. 1.

Radiographic examples of subsolid nodules. (A, B) Without pleural attachment nor indentation. (C, D) With pleural attachment, but without indentation. (E, F) With indentation, but without pleural attachment. (G, H) With both pleural attachment and indentation.

Fig. 2.

Effect of pleural attachment and indentation on recurrence-free survival of subsolid lung adenocarcinoma. A, attachment; I, indentation.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of 404 patients who underwent curative surgery for subsolid nodule

Variable	A– I– (n=120)	A+ I– (n=26)	A– I+ (n=117)	A+ I+ (n=141)	p-value
Male	56 (46.7)	12 (46.2)	63 (53.9)	56 (39.7)	0.162
Age (yr)	60.3±10.4	63.8±9.3	64.0±10.5	63.8±9.8	0.015
Ever smoker	40 (33.3)	11 (42.3)	50 (42.7)	48 (34.0)	0.364
Comorbidity
Other malignancy in 5 yr	15 (12.5)	2 (7.7)	14 (12.0)	18 (12.8)	0.907
History of tuberculosis	2 (1.7)	4 (15.4)	9 (7.7)	4 (2.8)	0.008
Asthma	3 (2.5)	0	3 (2.6)	3 (2.1)	> 0.999
Bronchiectasis	0	1 (3.9)	3 (2.6)	4 (2.8)	0.170
COPD	0	0	1 (0.9)	2 (1.4)	0.710
Preoperative PFT results
FVC (L)	3.48±0.77	3.07±0.73	3.41±0.89	3.18±0.77	0.005
FEV₁ (L)	2.65±0.57	2.39±0.55	2.55±0.74	2.42±0.58	0.018
FEV₁ /FVC (%)	76.7±8.2	78.2±5.9	74.9±10.1	76.6±9.2	0.240
Location of lung cancer
Right upper lobe	53 (44.2)	6 (23.1)	44 (37.6)	50 (35.5)	0.045
Right middle lobe	2 (1.7)	1 (3.9)	3 (2.6)	15 (10.6)
Right lower lobe	22 (18.3)	6 (23.1)	24 (20.5)	21 (14.9)
Left upper lobe	30 (25.0)	6 (23.1)	26 (22.2)	32 (22.7)
Left lower lobe	13 (10.8)	7 (26.9)	20 (17.1)	23 (16.3)
Type of subsolid nodule
Nonsolid nodule	61 (50.8)	4 (15.4)	18 (15.4)	26 (18.4)	< 0.001
Part-solid nodule
Solid portion ≤ 5 mm	31 (25.8)	3 (11.5)	13 (11.1)	19 (13.5)
Solid portion 5-8 mm^a)	14 (11.7)	3 (11.5)	13 (11.1)	17 (12.1)
Solid portion ≥ 5 mm	14 (11.7)	16 (61.5)	73 (62.4)	79 (56.0)
Longest diameter, mm	16.7±5.7	22.7±9.6	23.9±9.7	24.8±14.0	< 0.001
Extent of surgery
Wedge resection	33 (27.5)	7 (26.9)	20 (17.1)	32 (22.7)	0.319
Segmentectomy	17 (14.2)	4 (15.4)	20 (17.1)	14 (9.9)
Lobectomy	69 (57.5)	15 (57.7)	77 (65.8)	95 (67.4)
Pneumonectomy	1 (0.8)	0	0	0
Adjuvant therapy
None	118 (98.3)	26 (100)	109 (93.2)	124 (87.9)	0.012
Chemotherapy	2 (1.7)	0	5 (4.3)	15 (10.6)
Concurrent chemo-radiation	0	0	3 (2.6)	2 (1.4)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard variation. A, attachment; I, indentation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PFT, pulmonary function test; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

^a) Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

Table 2.

Radiographic findings associated with visceral pleural invasion

Variable	VPI present (n=36)	VPI absent (n=368)	p-value
Relation with pleura
A(–) I(–)	0/120 (0)	120/120 (100)	< 0.001
A(+) I(–)	1/26 (3.9)	25/26 (96.2)
A(–) I(+)	4/117 (3.4)	113/117 (96.6)
A(+) I(+)	31/141 (22.0)	110/141 (78.0)
Type of subsolid nodule
Nonsolid nodule	0/109 (0)	109/109 (100)	< 0.001
Part-solid nodule
Solid portion ≤ 5 mm	1/66 (1.5)	65/66 (98.5)
Solid portion 5-8 mm^a)	3/47 (6.4)	44/47 (93.6)
Solid portion ≥ 8 mm	32/182 (17.5)	150/182 (82.4)
Longest diameter (mm)	27 (23-40)	19 (14-25)	< 0.001
Location of lung cancer
Right upper lobe	10/153 (6.5)	143/153 (93.5)	0.694
Right middle lobe	3/21 (14.2)	18/21 (85.7)
Right lower lobe	7/73 (9.6)	66/73 (90.4)
Left upper lobe	10/94 (10.6)	84/94 (89.4)
Left lower lobe	6/63 (9.5)	57/63 (90.5)

Values are presented as number (%). VPI, visceral pleural invasion; A, attachment; I, indentation.

^a) Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

Table 3.

Radiographic factors associated with visceral pleural invasion in subsolid lung adenocarcinoma

Variable	OR	95% CI	p-value
Relation with pleura
A(–) I(–)	N/A	N/A	N/A
A(+) I(–)	0.12	0.02-0.98	0.048
A(–) I(+)	0.10	0.03-0.31	< 0.001
A(+) I(+)	Reference
Size of the solid portion
Absent solid portion	N/A	N/A	N/A
Solid portion ≤ 5 mm	0.13	0.02-1.02	0.052
Solid portion 5-8 mm^a)	0.44	0.12-1.65	0.221
Solid portion ≥ 8 mm	Reference
Longest diameter, by cm	1.24	0.93-1.64	0.144

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; A, attachment; I, indentation; N/A, not applicable.

^a) Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

Table 4.

Size of the solid portion and visceral pleural invasion according to the pleura-nodule relationship

Variable	Solid portion				p-value
Variable	None	≤ 5 mm	5-8 mm^a)	≥ 8 mm	p-value
VPI in A(–) I(–) group	0/61 (0)	0/31 (0)	0/14 (0)	0/14 (0)	N/A
VPI in A(+) I(–) group	0/4 (0)	0/3 (0)	0/3 (0)	1/16 (6.3)	> 0.999
VPI in A(–) I(+) group	0/18 (0)	0/13 (0)	0/13 (0)	4/73 (5.5)	0.849
VPI in A(+) I(+) group	0/26 (0)	1/19 (5.3)	3/17 (17.6)	27/79 (34.1)	< 0.001

Values are presented as number (%). VPI, visceral pleural invasion; A, attachment; I, indentation; N/A, not available.

^a) Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

REFERENCES

1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. Article PubMed
2. Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, Harewood R, Spika D, Wang XS, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet. 2015;385:977–1010. Article PubMed
3. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409. Article PubMed PMC
4. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1053–7. Article PubMed
5. Nakamura S, Fukui T, Kawaguchi K, Fukumoto K, Hirakawa A, Yokoi K. Does ground glass opacity-dominant feature have a prognostic significance even in clinical T2aN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma? Lung Cancer. 2015;89:38–42. Article PubMed
6. Ujiie H, Kadota K, Chaft JE, Buitrago D, Sima CS, Lee MC, et al. Solid predominant histologic subtype in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma is an independent predictor of early, extrathoracic, multisite recurrence and of poor postrecurrence survival. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2877–84. Article PubMed PMC
7. Seok Y, Lee E. Visceral pleural invasion is a significant prognostic factor in patients with partly solid lung adenocarcinoma sized 30 mm or smaller. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66:150–5. Article PubMed PDF
8. Kadota K, Nitadori J, Sima CS, Ujiie H, Rizk NP, Jones DR, et al. Tumor spread through air spaces is an important pattern of invasion and impacts the frequency and location of recurrences after limited resection for small stage I lung adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:806–14. Article PubMed PMC
9. Lu S, Tan KS, Kadota K, Eguchi T, Bains S, Rekhtman N, et al. Spread through Air Spaces (STAS) is an independent predictor of recurrence and lung cancer-specific death in squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:223–34. Article PubMed
10. Hsu JS, Han IT, Tsai TH, Lin SF, Jaw TS, Liu GC, et al. Pleural tags on CT scans to predict visceral pleural invasion of non-small cell lung cancer that does not abut the pleura. Radiology. 2016;279:590–6. Article PubMed
11. Ahn SY, Park CM, Jeon YK, Kim H, Lee JH, Hwang EJ, et al. Predictive CT features of visceral pleural invasion by T1-sized peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:561–6. Article PubMed
12. Zhao LL, Xie HK, Zhang LP, Zha JY, Zhou FY, Jiang GN, et al. Visceral pleural invasion in lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 3 cm with ground-glass opacity: a clinical, pathological and radiological study. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:1788–97. Article PubMed PMC
13. Zwirewich CV, Vedal S, Miller RR, Muller NL. Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1991;179:469–76. Article PubMed
14. Ko JP, Suh J, Ibidapo O, Escalon JG, Li J, Pass H, et al. Lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of quantitative CT findings with pathologic findings. Radiology. 2016;280:931–9. Article PubMed
15. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:39–51. Article PubMed PMC
16. Travis WD, Giroux DJ, Chansky K, Crowley J, Asamura H, Brambilla E, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the inclusion of broncho-pulmonary carcinoid tumors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:1213–23. Article PubMed
17. Seki N, Fujita Y, Shibakuki R, Seto T, Uematsu K, Eguchi K. Easier understanding of pleural indentation on computed tomography. Intern Med. 2007;46:2029–30. Article PubMed
18. Shimada Y, Yoshida J, Hishida T, Nishimura M, Ishii G, Nagai K. Predictive factors of pathologically proven noninvasive tumor characteristics in T1aN0M0 peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2012;141:1003–9. Article PubMed
19. Meniga IN, Tiljak MK, Ivankovic D, Aleric I, Zekan M, Hrabac P, et al. Prognostic value of computed tomography morphologic characteristics in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2010;11:98–104. Article PubMed
20. Zhang H, Lu C, Lu Y, Yu B, Lv F, Zhu Z. The predictive and prognostic values of factors associated with visceral pleural involvement in resected lung adenocarcinomas. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:2337–48. Article PubMed PMC
21. Bak SH, Lee HY, Kim JH, Um SW, Kwon OJ, Han J, et al. Quantitative CT scanning analysis of pure ground-glass opacity nodules predicts further CT scanning change. Chest. 2016;149:180–91. Article PubMed
22. Jiang L, Liang W, Shen J, Chen X, Shi X, He J, et al. The impact of visceral pleural invasion in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2015;148:903–11. Article PubMed
23. Huang H, Wang T, Hu B, Pan C. Visceral pleural invasion remains a size-independent prognostic factor in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1130–9. Article PubMed
24. Liu QX, Deng XF, Zhou D, Li JM, Min JX, Dai JG. Visceral pleural invasion impacts the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:1707–13. Article PubMed
25. Hattori A, Suzuki K, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, Oh S. Visceral pleural invasion is not a significant prognostic factor in patients with a part-solid lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:433–8. Article PubMed
26. Antony VB, Sahn SA, Mossman B, Gail DB, Kalica A. NHLBI workshop summaries. Pleural cell biology in health and disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:1236–9. Article PubMed
27. Yamamoto T, Kadoya N, Shirata Y, Koto M, Sato K, Matsushita H, et al. Impact of tumor attachment to the pleura measured by a pretreatment CT image on outcome of stage I NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:35.Article PubMed PMC PDF
28. Wang H, Schabath MB, Liu Y, Berglund AE, Bloom GC, Kim J, et al. Semiquantitative computed tomography characteristics for lung adenocarcinoma and their association with lung cancer survival. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015;16:e141–63. Article PubMed PMC
29. Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Pistolesi M, Goo JM, et al. Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2013;266:304–17. Article PubMed
30. Wang T, Zhou C, Zhou Q. Extent of visceral pleural invasion affects prognosis of resected non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1527.Article PubMed PMC PDF

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A CT-based deep learning model: visceral pleural invasion and survival prediction in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma
Xiaofeng Lin, Kunfeng Liu, Kunwei Li, Xiaojuan Chen, Biyun Chen, Sheng Li, Huai Chen, Li Li
iScience.2024; 27(1): 108712. CrossRef
CT-Based Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics Nomograms for the Preoperative Prediction of Spread Through Air Spaces in Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Yun Wang, Deng Lyu, Lei Hu, Junhong Wu, Shaofeng Duan, Taohu Zhou, Wenting Tu, Yi Xiao, Li Fan, Shiyuan Liu
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine.2024; 37(2): 520. CrossRef
Prognostic Analysis of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Abutting Adjacent Structures on Preoperative Computed Tomography
Soohwan Choi, Sun Kyun Ro, Seok Whan Moon
Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 136. CrossRef
Nomogram using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for the preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma
Yun Wang, Deng Lyu, Su Hu, Yanqing Ma, Shaofeng Duan, Yayuan Geng, Taohu Zhou, Wenting Tu, Yi Xiao, Li Fan, Shiyuan Liu
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
Mengchao Xue, Rongyang Li, Junjie Liu, Ming Lu, Zhenyi Li, Huiying Zhang, Hui Tian
Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of postoperative recurrence-free survival in non–small cell lung cancer patients based on consensus clustering
Q. Tian, S.-Y. Zhou, Y.-H. Qin, Y.-Y. Wu, C. Qin, H. Zhou, J. Shi, S.-F. Duan, F. Feng
Clinical Radiology.2024; 79(10): e1214. CrossRef
Predicting bone metastasis-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer from preoperative CT via deep learning
Jia Guo, Jianguo Miao, Weikai Sun, Yanlei Li, Pei Nie, Wenjian Xu
npj Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Tumour–pleura relationship on CT is a risk factor for occult lymph node metastasis in peripheral clinical stage IA solid adenocarcinoma
Chengzhou Zhang, Liping Wang, Xiaoting Cai, Mengfei Li, Dandan Sun, Ping Wang
European Radiology.2023; 33(5): 3083. CrossRef
Analysis of the relevance between computed tomography characterization and pathology of pulmonary ground-glass nodules with different pathology types
Zhang Youguo, Wang Chengye, Cheng Xiaofei, Zhang Xuefei, Liu Changhong
Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2023; 31(1): 95. CrossRef
Risk factors for loss of pulmonary function after wedge resection for peripheral ground-glass opacity dominant lung cancer
Tomohiro Miyoshi, Hiroyuki Ito, Masashi Wakabayashi, Tadayoshi Hashimoto, Yuta Sekino, Kenji Suzuki, Masahiro Tsuboi, Yasumitsu Moriya, Ichiro Yoshino, Tetsuya Isaka, Aritoshi Hattori, Takahiro Mimae, Mitsuhiro Isaka, Tomohiro Maniwa, Makoto Endo, Hiroshi
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Volumetric analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative assessment of non-small cell lung cancer
Jianqin Jiang, Yigang Fu, Lili Zhang, Jia Liu, Xiaowen Gu, Weiwei Shao, Lei Cui, Gaofeng Xu
Japanese Journal of Radiology.2022; 40(9): 903. CrossRef
A Nomogram Combined Radiomics and Clinical Features as Imaging Biomarkers for Prediction of Visceral Pleural Invasion in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Xinyi Zha, Yuanqing Liu, Xiaoxia Ping, Jiayi Bao, Qian Wu, Su Hu, Chunhong Hu
Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Radiologists with and without deep learning–based computer-aided diagnosis: comparison of performance and interobserver agreement for characterizing and diagnosing pulmonary nodules/masses
Tomohiro Wataya, Masahiro Yanagawa, Mitsuko Tsubamoto, Tomoharu Sato, Daiki Nishigaki, Kosuke Kita, Kazuki Yamagata, Yuki Suzuki, Akinori Hata, Shoji Kido, Noriyuki Tomiyama
European Radiology.2022; 33(1): 348. CrossRef
The value of CT radiomics features to predict visceral pleural invasion in ≤3 cm peripheral type early non-small cell lung cancer
Shu-Hua Wei, Jin-Mei Zhang, Bin Shi, Fei Gao, Zhao-Xuan Zhang, Li-Ting Qian
Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology.2022; 30(6): 1115. CrossRef
Pathological components and CT imaging analysis of the area adjacent pleura within the pure ground-glass nodules with pleural deformation in invasive lung adenocarcinoma
Yining Jiang, Ziqi Xiong, Wenjing Zhao, Di Tian, Qiuping Zhang, Zhiyong Li
BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model
Xiaoling Ma, Liming Xia, Jun Chen, Weijia Wan, Wen Zhou
European Radiology.2022; 33(3): 1949. CrossRef
Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Challenges and a Look Ahead, From the AJR Special Series on Radiology Reporting and Data Systems
Lydia Chelala, Rydhwana Hossain, Ella A. Kazerooni, Jared D. Christensen, Debra S. Dyer, Charles S. White
American Journal of Roentgenology.2021; 216(6): 1411. CrossRef
Predicting pathological lymph node status in clinical stage IA peripheral lung adenocarcinoma
Keiju Aokage, Kenji Suzuki, Masashi Wakabayashi, Tomonori Mizutani, Aritoshi Hattori, Haruhiko Fukuda, Shun-Ichi Watanabe
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.2021; 60(1): 64. CrossRef
Discriminating Small-Sized (2 cm or Less), Noncalcified, Solitary Pulmonary Tuberculoma and Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma in Tuberculosis-Endemic Areas
Jingping Zhang, Tingting Han, Jialiang Ren, Chenwang Jin, Ming Zhang, Youmin Guo
Diagnostics.2021; 11(6): 930. CrossRef
Association of postoperative recurrence with radiological and clinicopathological features in patients with stage IA–IIA lung adenocarcinoma
Yanyan Zhang, Fengnian Zhao, Minghao Wu, Yunqing Zhao, Ying Liu, Qian Li, Guiming Zhou, Zhaoxiang Ye
European Journal of Radiology.2021; 141: 109802. CrossRef
Characterization of Newly Detected Costal Pleura–attached Noncalcified Nodules at Annual Low-Dose CT Screenings
Yeqing Zhu, Rowena Yip, Nan You, Qiang Cai, Claudia I. Henschke, David F. Yankelevitz, Claudia I. Henschke, David F. Yankelevitz, Rowena Yip, Dongming Xu, Mary Salvatore, Raja Flores, Andrea Wolf, David S. Mendelson, Dorothy I. McCauley, Mildred Chen, Dan
Radiology.2021; 301(3): 724. CrossRef
Clinicopathological and computed tomographic features associated with occult lymph node metastasis in patients with peripheral solid non-small cell lung cancer
Xiao-Qun He, Tian-You Luo, Xian Li, Ji-Wen Huo, Jun-Wei Gong, Qi Li
European Journal of Radiology.2021; 144: 109981. CrossRef
Surgical Extent for Ground Glass Nodules
Suk Ki Cho
Journal of Chest Surgery.2021; 54(5): 338. CrossRef
CT-guided microcoil localization for pulmonary nodules before VATS: a retrospective evaluation of risk factors for pleural marking failure
Yanyan Xu, Lingchuan Ma, Hongliang Sun, Zhenguo Huang, Zhenrong Zhang, Fei Xiao, Qianli Ma, Chuandong Li, Xiaomeng Zhang, Sheng Xie
European Radiology.2020; 30(10): 5674. CrossRef
Management of Nodules Attached to the Costal Pleura at Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer
Yeqing Zhu, Rowena Yip, Nan You, Claudia I. Henschke, David F. Yankelevitz
Radiology.2020; 297(3): 710. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Clinical Significance of Pleural Attachment and Indentation of Subsolid Nodule Lung Cancer

Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1540-1548. Published online March 25, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.057

XML Download

Figure

Related articles

Clinical Significance of Combining Preoperative and Postoperative Albumin-Bilirubin Score in Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Significance of Pleural Attachment and Indentation of Subsolid Nodule Lung Cancer

Fig. 1. Radiographic examples of subsolid nodules. (A, B) Without pleural attachment nor indentation. (C, D) With pleural attachment, but without indentation. (E, F) With indentation, but without pleural attachment. (G, H) With both pleural attachment and indentation.

Fig. 2. Effect of pleural attachment and indentation on recurrence-free survival of subsolid lung adenocarcinoma. A, attachment; I, indentation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Clinical Significance of Pleural Attachment and Indentation of Subsolid Nodule Lung Cancer

Variable	A– I– (n=120)	A+ I– (n=26)	A– I+ (n=117)	A+ I+ (n=141)	p-value
Male	56 (46.7)	12 (46.2)	63 (53.9)	56 (39.7)	0.162
Age (yr)	60.3±10.4	63.8±9.3	64.0±10.5	63.8±9.8	0.015
Ever smoker	40 (33.3)	11 (42.3)	50 (42.7)	48 (34.0)	0.364
Comorbidity
Other malignancy in 5 yr	15 (12.5)	2 (7.7)	14 (12.0)	18 (12.8)	0.907
History of tuberculosis	2 (1.7)	4 (15.4)	9 (7.7)	4 (2.8)	0.008
Asthma	3 (2.5)	0	3 (2.6)	3 (2.1)	> 0.999
Bronchiectasis	0	1 (3.9)	3 (2.6)	4 (2.8)	0.170
COPD	0	0	1 (0.9)	2 (1.4)	0.710
Preoperative PFT results
FVC (L)	3.48±0.77	3.07±0.73	3.41±0.89	3.18±0.77	0.005
FEV₁ (L)	2.65±0.57	2.39±0.55	2.55±0.74	2.42±0.58	0.018
FEV₁ /FVC (%)	76.7±8.2	78.2±5.9	74.9±10.1	76.6±9.2	0.240
Location of lung cancer
Right upper lobe	53 (44.2)	6 (23.1)	44 (37.6)	50 (35.5)	0.045
Right middle lobe	2 (1.7)	1 (3.9)	3 (2.6)	15 (10.6)
Right lower lobe	22 (18.3)	6 (23.1)	24 (20.5)	21 (14.9)
Left upper lobe	30 (25.0)	6 (23.1)	26 (22.2)	32 (22.7)
Left lower lobe	13 (10.8)	7 (26.9)	20 (17.1)	23 (16.3)
Type of subsolid nodule
Nonsolid nodule	61 (50.8)	4 (15.4)	18 (15.4)	26 (18.4)	< 0.001
Part-solid nodule
Solid portion ≤ 5 mm	31 (25.8)	3 (11.5)	13 (11.1)	19 (13.5)
Solid portion 5-8 mm^a)	14 (11.7)	3 (11.5)	13 (11.1)	17 (12.1)
Solid portion ≥ 5 mm	14 (11.7)	16 (61.5)	73 (62.4)	79 (56.0)
Longest diameter, mm	16.7±5.7	22.7±9.6	23.9±9.7	24.8±14.0	< 0.001
Extent of surgery
Wedge resection	33 (27.5)	7 (26.9)	20 (17.1)	32 (22.7)	0.319
Segmentectomy	17 (14.2)	4 (15.4)	20 (17.1)	14 (9.9)
Lobectomy	69 (57.5)	15 (57.7)	77 (65.8)	95 (67.4)
Pneumonectomy	1 (0.8)	0	0	0
Adjuvant therapy
None	118 (98.3)	26 (100)	109 (93.2)	124 (87.9)	0.012
Chemotherapy	2 (1.7)	0	5 (4.3)	15 (10.6)
Concurrent chemo-radiation	0	0	3 (2.6)	2 (1.4)

Variable	VPI present (n=36)	VPI absent (n=368)	p-value
Relation with pleura
A(–) I(–)	0/120 (0)	120/120 (100)	< 0.001
A(+) I(–)	1/26 (3.9)	25/26 (96.2)
A(–) I(+)	4/117 (3.4)	113/117 (96.6)
A(+) I(+)	31/141 (22.0)	110/141 (78.0)
Type of subsolid nodule
Nonsolid nodule	0/109 (0)	109/109 (100)	< 0.001
Part-solid nodule
Solid portion ≤ 5 mm	1/66 (1.5)	65/66 (98.5)
Solid portion 5-8 mm^a)	3/47 (6.4)	44/47 (93.6)
Solid portion ≥ 8 mm	32/182 (17.5)	150/182 (82.4)
Longest diameter (mm)	27 (23-40)	19 (14-25)	< 0.001
Location of lung cancer
Right upper lobe	10/153 (6.5)	143/153 (93.5)	0.694
Right middle lobe	3/21 (14.2)	18/21 (85.7)
Right lower lobe	7/73 (9.6)	66/73 (90.4)
Left upper lobe	10/94 (10.6)	84/94 (89.4)
Left lower lobe	6/63 (9.5)	57/63 (90.5)

Variable	OR	95% CI	p-value
Relation with pleura
A(–) I(–)	N/A	N/A	N/A
A(+) I(–)	0.12	0.02-0.98	0.048
A(–) I(+)	0.10	0.03-0.31	< 0.001
A(+) I(+)	Reference
Size of the solid portion
Absent solid portion	N/A	N/A	N/A
Solid portion ≤ 5 mm	0.13	0.02-1.02	0.052
Solid portion 5-8 mm^a)	0.44	0.12-1.65	0.221
Solid portion ≥ 8 mm	Reference
Longest diameter, by cm	1.24	0.93-1.64	0.144

Variable	Solid portion				p-value
Variable	None	≤ 5 mm	5-8 mm^a)	≥ 8 mm	p-value
VPI in A(–) I(–) group	0/61 (0)	0/31 (0)	0/14 (0)	0/14 (0)	N/A
VPI in A(+) I(–) group	0/4 (0)	0/3 (0)	0/3 (0)	1/16 (6.3)	> 0.999
VPI in A(–) I(+) group	0/18 (0)	0/13 (0)	0/13 (0)	4/73 (5.5)	0.849
VPI in A(+) I(+) group	0/26 (0)	1/19 (5.3)	3/17 (17.6)	27/79 (34.1)	< 0.001

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of 404 patients who underwent curative surgery for subsolid nodule

Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

Table 2. Radiographic findings associated with visceral pleural invasion

Values are presented as number (%). VPI, visceral pleural invasion; A, attachment; I, indentation.

Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

Table 3. Radiographic factors associated with visceral pleural invasion in subsolid lung adenocarcinoma

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; A, attachment; I, indentation; N/A, not applicable.

Excludes 5 and 8 mm.

Table 4. Size of the solid portion and visceral pleural invasion according to the pleura-nodule relationship

Values are presented as number (%). VPI, visceral pleural invasion; A, attachment; I, indentation; N/A, not available.