Investigating Trk Protein Expression between Oropharyngeal and Non-oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Possible Roles of Human Papillomavirus Infection

Yoon Ah Cho; Ji Myung Chung; Hyunmi Ryu; Eun Kyung Kim; Byoung Chul Cho; Sun Och Yoon

doi:10.4143/crt.2018.411

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 51(3); 2019 > Article

Original Article Investigating Trk Protein Expression between Oropharyngeal and Non-oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Possible Roles of Human Papillomavirus Infection: Yoon Ah Cho, MD¹, Ji Myung Chung, MS², Hyunmi Ryu, PhD¹, Eun Kyung Kim, MD, PhD¹, Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD³, Sun Och Yoon, MD, PhD^1,; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2019;51(3):1052-1063.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.411
Published online: October 24, 2018

¹Department of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

²Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

³Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Sun Och Yoon, MD, PhD Department of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
Tel: 82-2-2228-1763 Fax: 82-2-362-0860 E-mail: soyoon@yuhs.ac

• Received: July 18, 2018 • Accepted: October 23, 2018

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

7,902 Views
249 Download
10 Web of Science
9 Crossref
10 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
The relationship between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and subtypes of tropomyosin-related kinase (Trk) has not been studied in-depth. In this study, we evaluated the expression patterns of TrkA, TrkB, and panTrk and their clinicopathological significance as well as association with p16 expression and human papilloma virus (HPV) status.
Materials and Methods
Total of 396 radically resected oropharyngeal (n=121) and non-oropharyngeal (n=275) HNSCCs were included. Immunohistochemistry for TrkA, TrkB, and panTrk was performed. In addition, p16 immunohistochemistry was performed to assess the HPV status. Using HPV-negative HNSCC cell lines, FaDu and CAL27, HPV type 16 E6/E7 gene was transfected, and then changes of TrkA and TrkB expression were analyzed.
Results
In the clinical samples of HNSCC, high expression of TrkA and panTrk were more associated with oropharyngeal and p16 positive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In patients with completely resected (R0-resected) oropharyngeal SCC, high TrkA expression was related to superior overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS). In patients with R0-resected oral cavity SCC, high panTrk was related to poor RFS. In HPV type E6/E7 gene-transfected FaDu and CAL27 cell lines, increase of TrkA expression was observed.
Conclusion
It seems that expression pattern of panTrk and TrkA differed according to anatomical sites of HNSCC and was closely related to p16 expression and patient prognosis. Trk expression should be considered in the context of anatomical site, p16 expression or HPV status and Trk subtypes.
Key words: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Trk proteins, TrkA, TrkB, panTrk, Human papillomavirus

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a rare cancer [1]. Recurrence and metastasis occur in about one third of all HNSCC patients. When recurrence or metastasis occurs, the outcomes are dismal [2]. Therefore, it is desirable to have alternative treatment options for such cases.

Oropharyngeal cancer, in contrast to other non-oropharyngeal head and neck cancers, is known to be related to human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, and patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer have a better prognosis than those with HPV-negative cancer [3]. According to the recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification [4,5], oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is classified as HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal SCC. Regarding ‘HPV-positive’ and ‘HPV-negative,’ the new WHO classification [4,5] specifically note p16 immunohistochemistry alone (with appropriate criteria for a positive versus negative test) as a suitable surrogate marker and recommend the terminology HPV-positive even if only p16 is performed. Using moderate to intense nuclear and cytoplasmic p16 immunohistochemistry in 70% or more of the tumor cells as surrogate marker for HPV status has been widely validated, especially in oropharyngeal SCC [6,7]. HPV status appears to affect tumor characteristics in patients with oropharyngeal cancer, but the underlying mechanism has not yet been clarified.

Trophomyosin-related kinases (Trk), namely TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC, belong to a family of neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinases and are encoded by the NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 genes, respectively. TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC bind to nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and neurotrophin 3, respectively [8]. In HNSCC, TrkB is known to be overexpressed and related to oncogenesis, tumor progression, and conventional chemotherapy resistance [9,10].

While attempts to describe Trk expression patterns have drawn increasing interest, Trk expression status has rarely been studied in clinical samples of HNSCC. In this study, we sought to evaluate the expression status of Trk in oropharyngeal cancer and non-oropharyngeal cancer and to determine its clinicopathological significance. In addition, possible associations between HPV status, p16 expression and Trk protein expression were investigated.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients, samples, and clinical data

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were obtained from consecutive HNSCC patients who underwent surgical resection with curative aim at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between 2005 and 2012. Appropriate cases were selected from among the archived cases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: available tumor tissue, relevant clinical data regarding smoking status and survival data, absence of preoperative treatment, and no clinicopathologic evidence of distant metastasis at the time of surgery. We excluded HNSCC tissue samples that had been subjected to decalcification for accurate immunohistochemistry. Ultimately, 121 oropharyngeal cases and 275 non-oropharyngeal cases, total 396 cases were selected, among which complete R0 resection, defined histologically as tumor-free resection margins, achieved in 305 (S1 Table). Several pathologic factors, including tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, pathologic TNM staging, according to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria and tumor classification by the WHO system [11,12], were obtained from the slide review by two individual pathologists (Y.A. Cho and S.O. Yoon). Clinical data and survival outcomes were collected and reviewed from patients’ medical records. The median follow-up period was 37.1 months (range, 0.8 to 99.6 months). Other clinicopathologic characteristics are described in S1 Table.

2. Tissue microarray preparation

Sections of FFPE tissues were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Representative tumor areas were confirmed microscopically, selected two or three different representative areas per case, and used for tissue microarray (TMA) construction as previously described [13].

3. Immunohistochemistry and interpretation

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-μm TMA tissue sections with a Ventana Bench Mark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) as described in previous reports [14,15]. The following primary antibodies were tested: anti-TrkA antibody (1:100 dilution, EP1058Y, rabbit monoclonal antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-TrkB antibody (1:300 dilution, ab18987, rabbit polyclonal antibody, Abcam), anti-panTrk (1:100 dilution, Trk A+B+C, EPR17341, rabbit monoclonal antibody, Abcam), and p16 (E03347, mouse monoclonal antibody, RTU, Ventana Medical Systems).

Expression of Trk subtypes was analyzed according to the semi-quantitative H-score method; this method yields a total score range of 0-300 as previously described [16]. The intensity of expression was scored by cytoplasmic staining only (Fig. 1A-D). Conventionally accepted criteria were used for p16 immunohistochemistry as previously described. Positive and negative pattern is described in Fig. 1E and F respectively [17-22].

4. Cell lines and culture

HNSCC cell lines FaDu, a cell line derived from HPV-negative pharynx SCC, and CAL27, a cell line derived from HPV-negative tongue SCC were prepared. FaDu cell line was maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (22400-089, Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; 5000-044, Gibco, Life Technologies). CAL27 and UMSCC 47 cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (SH30243.01, HyClone, Thermo Scientific, Logan, UT) supplemented with 10% FBS (6000-044, Gibco, Life Technologies).

5. Transfection with HPV gene

Plasmid p1321 HPV-16 E6/E7 or empty plasmid vector (Addgene, Cambridge, MA) was transfected into each cell-line of FaDu and CAL27 by using TransIT-X2 Dynamic Delivery System (Mirus, Madison, WI).

6. RNA isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction

RNA was isolated after 24 hours and 48 hours of transfection using RNeasy plus mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA was made using qPCRBIO cDNA synthesis kit (PCR Biosystems, London, UK). Primers of GAPDH, E6, E7, TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC were manufactured (Integrated DNA Technologies, Skokie, IL), and primer sequences were summarized in S2 Table. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using 2× qPCRBIO SyGreen Mix Lo-Rox (PCR Biosystems) as PCR reagent and ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the following cycling parameters: 95°C for 2 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds, 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 10 minutes. Relative mRNA expression levels were determined by the comparative method (2^-ddCt).

7. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS ver. 22 software for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test, were used to analyze the significance of differences between the evaluated variables. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of initial diagnosis to that of death or the last follow-up visit. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was measured from the date of initial diagnosis to that of disease progression, defined as cancer recurrence, continuance of stable disease/partial remission/progressive disease without complete remission, or cancer-related death during the study period. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival rates, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate regression analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

8. Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital with a waiver of informed consent (No. 4-2015-0954).

Results

1. Expression status of Trk protein according to anatomical site and p16 expression

In overall HNSCC cases, TrkA expression was on average 91.8 (range, 0 to 230), TrkB 36.8 (range, 0 to 278), and panTrk 79.2 (range, 0 to 263) among all HNSCC cases (S3 Fig.). Trk expression varied among anatomical sites. Expression of TrkA and panTrk was significantly higher in oropharyngeal SCCs than non-oropharyngeal SCCs. Also both expressions were significantly higher in p16 positive HNSCCs than negative cases. However, TrkB expression showed no correlation with anatomical sites and p16 status (Fig. 2A and B, S4 and S5 Figs.).

2. Alteration of Trk protein expression by HPV gene transfection

After transfection of HPV-16 E6/E7 gene inserted plasmid, significant increase of E6 and E7 gene expression was confirmed at the time of 24 and 48 hours after transfection (S6 Fig.). The levels of TrkA, TrkB and TrkC mRNA level were measured 48 hours after transfection; and both FaDu and CAL27 transfected with HPV-16 E6/E7 genes revealed increased |expression of TrkA and TrkC when compared to control (Fig. 3A, B, E and F). TrkB gene expression showed a tendency of decreased expression after HPV-16 E6/E7 gene transfection (Fig. 3C and D).

3. Clinicopathological characteristics in conjunction with Trk expression

Among all HNSCC cases, high TrkA and panTrk expression was significantly associated with the presence of lymphovascular invasion and p16 expression (Table 1). In addition, high panTrk expression was significantly associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001). However, other clinicopathologic variables were not related to the expression of TrkA and panTrk proteins (Table 1). In oropharyngeal HNSCCs, only p16 expression was significantly associated with TrkA and panTrk protein expression (p < 0.001 and p=0.038, respectively) (Table 2). However, panTrk expression was significantly correlated with the presence of lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), presence of perineural invasion (p=0.007), advanced pathologic T category (p=0.045), and presence of lymph node metastasis (p=0.002) in non-oropharyngeal HNSCC (Table 3). Both TrkA and panTrk expression showed no significant correlation with perinodal soft tissue extension status. TrkB expression status showed no statistically significant correlation with any of the clinico-pathologic factors (S7 Table).

4. Prognostic impact of Trk protein expression on HNSCC patients

Among R0 resected HNSCCs (n=305), five cases were not available for Kaplan-Meier analysis due to the absence of follow-up data. Among 300 cases of R0 resected HNSCCs, high TrkA expression showed a tendency to be related to superior OS (Fig. 4A), although it was not associated with RFS (Fig. 4B). Especially in R0-resected oropharyngeal SCCs (n=82), high TrkA expression was significantly related to superior OS (Fig. 4C) and RFS (Fig. 4D). In non-oropharyngeal SCCs, especially in those of oral cavity (n=181), high panTrk expression tended to be related to poor OS and inferior RFS than those with low panTrk expression (Fig. 4E and F). TrkB expression was not related to OS or RFS in oropharyngeal or non-oropharyngeal SCCs (S8 Fig.). Other nonoropharyngeal SCCs showed no significant correlation with the expression of TrkA and panTRK protein in Kaplan-Meier analysis (S9 and S10 Figs.).

In multivariate Cox analysis in R0 resected oropharyngeal HNSCC, only p16 expression status and pathologic T category acts as independent prognostic factors for OS and RFS (Table 4). However, in R0 resected oral cavity HNSCCs, age, presence of lymphovascular invasion and advanced pathologic T category were independent factors for OS and RFS (S11 Table). Higher panTrk expression tends to relate with inferior RFS in multivariate analysis (p=0.060) (S11 Table). In Kaplan-Meier analysis of 91 R1-resected head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in association with Trk expression, no significant difference was observed in OS and RFS according to TrkA, panTRkA, or TrkB expression (S12 Fig.).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated and compared the expression status of subtypes of Trk in oropharyngeal cancer and non-oropharyngeal cancer and investigated the relationship between the expression levels of these subtypes and p16 expression status, clinicopathological variables, and patient prognosis.

In our study, cytoplasmic staining of tumors varied in intensity. Recent studies have described the reliability of pan-Trk and TrkA immunohistochemical staining in the prediction of NTRK gene alteration [23-25]: one study reported 15 cases of positive pan-Trk positive staining in 16 cases of known NTRK fusions. Interestingly, cytoplasmic staining accompanied by other expression patterns has been found to be associated with specific NTRK fusion patterns: EML4-NTRK3 fusion with nuclear staining, LMNA-NTK1 fusion with nuclear membrane staining, and TPM3/4-NTRK1/3 and TRAF2-NTRK2 fusion with membranous staining [24]. Also, research suggest that strong cytoplasmic TrkA expression might be related with NTRK1 gene fusion in colorectal cancers [23] and might be indicative of gene copy number gain in solid tumors, such as lung adenocarcinoma, and colon and bile duct cancer [25].

We observed that TrkA and panTrk were expressed more highly in oropharyngeal than non-oropharyngeal SCCs. Oropharyngeal cancer shows a significant association with HPV infection, in contrast to non-oropharyngeal SCC. Carcinomas driven by HPV infection induce p16 protein overexpression through loss of control over cell cycle regulation; therefore, p16 immunohistochemistry is a reliable surrogate marker for HPV infection [18,19,21,22,26,27]. These previous findings and those of the present study suggest that high expression of TrkA and panTrk might be related to HPV-driven molecular changes during the carcinogenesis of oropharyngeal SCCs. In the present study, HPV gene transfection on the originally HPV-negative HNSCC cell-lines altered TrkA and TrkB gene expression. Especially, the increment of TrkA and TrkC gene expression after HPV gene transfection reflects our observation about the close correlation between high TrkA and panTrk (A+B+C) expression and p16 positive HNSCC cases. From the findings, HPV infection may play a role in regulation of TrkA and TrkC expression. Further in-depth studies are needed for the detailed mechanisms related to the interaction between HPV infection and each Trk subtype regulation.

Besides HPV infection, genetic alteration may be related to alter Trk expression. According to recent The Cancer Genome Atlas data for HNSCCs (530 samples/528 patients; www.cbioportal.org/study?id=hnsc_tcga#summary); however, mutations of the NTRK1, 2, and 3 genes have a very low frequency (0.6%, 0.6%, and 2.1%, respectively), and copy number alterations (amp-lifications or deletions) are also low frequency (1.2%, 0.8%, and 0.6%, respectively). These findings suggest that genetic mutations or copy number alterations are not the major factors underlying TrkA and panTrk overexpression in HNSCCs. A recent study of colorectal adenocarcinomas reported that high TrkA protein expression was related to NTRK1 gene rearrangement [28]. Although colorectal adenocarcinomas are very different from HNSCCs in terms of anatomical origin, histology, and biology of carcinogenesis, investigation of NTRK gene rearrangements should be performed to gain insights into the mechanism underlying TrkA and panTrk overexpression in HNSCCs.

In the present study, high TrkA expression was related to favorable prognosis. Given that HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCCs have a more favorable prognosis than HPV-negative carcinomas [29], and that high TrkA expression was associated with p16 positivity in the present study, close association between high TrkA expression and the favorable outcome of oropharyngeal SCCs may be related to HPV infection. Further in-depth study, however, may be necessary about the relations among HPV infection, Trk regulation, tumor cell growth.

In contrast, high panTrk expression was related to poor outcomes in patients with oral cavity SCCs, but couldn’t prove as independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS. Regarding previous studies about pancreatic cancer and adenoid cystic carcinoma [30,31], overexpression of Trk protein is associated with tumor metastasis or perineural invasion which is concordant with our result. Given that panTrk includes TrkA, B, and C, among TrkA, B, and C or the combination of these Trk subtypes affects lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion and contribute to the poor outcome in patients with oral cavity SCCs. However, we were not able to assess TrkC protein expression by immunohistochemistry, because of the lack of commercially available and reliable antibodies. Although further studies are required to identify the prognostic relevance of TrkC, oral cavity SCCs showing high panTrk expression may be candidates for treatment with panTrk inhibitors.

In previous in vitro study, TrkB expression may be related with tumor proliferation and chemotherapy resistance [32-34]. However, we could not prove the relationship between TrkB expression and OS or RFS. This might be limitation of immunohistochemical staining of TrkB protein. Since our study cohort is composed of surgically resected specimen without prior therapy, there may be need for TrkB expression status in samples of recurrent HNSCC or chemotherapy-resistant cases.

Trk protein expression seems to differ according to anatomical site and p16 expression or HPV status with clinical relevance. As a result, Trk expression status should be considered in the context of anatomical site and Trk subtype when considering treatment using Trk inhibitors.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at Cancer Research and Treatment website (http://www.e-crt.org).

crt-2018-411-suppl1.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl2.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl3.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl4.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl5.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl6.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl7.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl8.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl9.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl10.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl11.pdf

crt-2018-411-suppl12.pdf

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a grant from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1-A1A09059399).

Fig. 1.

Expression pattern of Trk protein and p16 using immunohistochemistry (×200). Representative expression as assessed by Trk immunohistochemistry: Trk showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells. The four cases shown had different intensities of Trk expression in all tumor cells. (A) Negative, H-score 0. (B) Intensity 1, H-score 100. (C) Intensity 2, H-score 200. (D) Intensity 3, H-score 300. Strong and diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of p16 immunohistochemical staining (E) and negative staining was observed (F).

Fig. 2.

Expression of Trk protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas according to anatomical location and p16 status. (A) H-scores of TrkA and panTrk were significantly higher at oropharyngeal sites than non-oropharyngeal areas (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in H-scores of TrkB according to anatomical site. (B) H-scores of TrkA and panTrk were higher in p16 positive cases than p16 negative cases. No significant difference was observed in the H-score of TrkB between p16 positive cases and p16 negative cases.

Fig. 3.

Alteration of TrkA and TrkB expression and proliferation ability by HPV-16 oncogene. (A) Increased level of TrkA mRNA 48 hours after transfection in FaDu cell line. (B) Increased level of TrkA mRNA 48 hours after transfection in CAL-27 cell-line. (C) Slight decreased level of TrkB mRNA in FaDu cell line. (D) Decreased level of TrkB in CAL27 cell line. Increased level of TrkC mRNA 48 hours after transfection in FaDu cell line (E) and CAL27 cell line (F). CTR, transfection with empty vector; HPV, transfection with HPV-16 oncogene.

Fig. 4.

Kaplan-Meier analysis of R0-resected head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in aspect of anatomical sites. (A) In the analysis of 300 R0 resected cases, TrkA high expression group tended to have a longer overall survival (OS) than the Trk low expression group (p=0.060). (B) No significant difference was observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to TrkA expression status (p=0.348). (C) In the analysis of 82 R0 resected oropharyngeal SCCs, TrkA high group had a significantly longer OS than the TrkA low expression group (p=0.044). (D) In addition, the TrkA high group showed longer RFS than the TrkA low expression group (p=0.032). (E) In 180 R0 resected oral cavity SCCs, high panTrk expression tended to be related to poor OS (p=0.065). (F) Furthermore, the high panTrk group showed a significantly inferior RFS than the low panTrk group (p=0.001).

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics of 391 HNSCCs according to TrkA and panTrk expression status

Variable	No. (n=391)^a)	TrkA expression		p-value	panTrk expression		p-value
Variable	No. (n=391)^a)	High (n=160)	Low (n=231)	p-value	High (n=169)	Low (n=222)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 58	190	76 (47.5)	114 (49.4)	0.758	73 (43.2)	117 (52.7)	0.067
≥ 58	201	84 (52.5)	117 (50.6)		96 (56.8)	105 (47.3)
Sex
Female	97	40 (25.0)	57 (24.7)	> 0.999	34 (20.1)	63 (28.4)	0.076
Male	294	120 (75.0)	175 (75.3)		135 (79.9)	159 (71.6)
Location
Hypopharynx	28	8 (5.0)	20 (8.7)	0.011	13 (7.7)	15 (6.8)	< 0.001
Larynx	42	12 (7.5)	30 (13.0)		16 (9.5)	26 (11.7)
Oral cavity	200	77 (48.1)	123 (53.2)		57 (33.7)	143 (64.4)
Oropharynx	121	63 (39.4)	58 (25.1)		83 (49.1)	38 (17.1)
Smoking
Non-smoker	151	70 (43.8)	81 (35.1)	0.214	55 (32.5)	96 (43.2)	0.085
Ex-smoker	80	29 (18.1)	51 (22.1)		40 (23.7)	40 (18.0)
Smoker	160	61 (38.1)	99 (42.9)		74 (43.8)	86 (38.7)
p16 IHC status
Negative	269	88 (55.0)	181 (78.4)	< 0.001	86 (50.9)	183 (82.4)	< 0.001
Positive	122	72 (45.0)	50 (21.6)		83 (49.1)	39 (17.6)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	315	118 (73.8)	197 (85.3)	0.004	119 (70.4)	196 (88.3)	< 0.001
Present	76	42 (26.3)	34 (14.7)		50 (29.6)	26 (11.7)
Perineural invasion
Absent	337	132 (82.5)	205 (88.7)	0.054	139 (82.2)	198 (89.2)	0.055
Present	54	28 (17.5)	26 (11.3)		30 (17.8)	24 (10.8)
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	321	128 (80.0)	193 (83.5)	0.421	133 (78.7)	188 (84.7)	0.143
pT3-4	70	32 (20.0)	38 (16.5)		36 (21.3)	34 (15.3)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	172	62 (38.8)	110 (47.6)	0.097	53 (31.4)	119 (53.6)	< 0.001
Present	219	98 (61.3)	121 (52.4)		116 (68.6)	103 (46.4)
Perinodal soft tissue extension^b)
Absent	52	25 (34.7)	27 (35.1)	> 0.999	24 (29.6)	28 (41.2)	0.169
Present	97	47 (65.3)	50 (64.9)		57 (70.4)	40 (58.8)

Values are presented as number (%). HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

^a) TrkA and PanTrk immunohistochemistry was performed in all 396 cases but five cases could not be interpreted because of a damaged core,

^b) The perinodal soft tissue extension status was evaluated in 149 HNSCC cases.

Table 2.

Clinicopathological characteristics of 121 oropharyngeal HNSCCs according to TrkA and panTrk expression status

Variable	No. (n=121)	TrkA expression		p-value	panTrk expression		p-value
Variable	No. (n=121)	High (n=63)	Low (n=58)	p-value	High (n=83)	Low (n=38)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 58	57	27 (42.9)	30 (51.7)	0.365	38 (45.8)	19 (50.0)	0.698
≥ 58	64	36 (57.1)	28 (48.3)		45 (54.2)	19 (50.0)
Sex
Female	20	8 (12.7)	12 (20.7)	0.328	14 (16.9)	6 (15.8)	> 0.999
Male	101	55 (87.3)	46 (79.3)		69 (83.1)	32 (84.2)
Smoking
Non-smoker	38	22 (34.9)	16 (27.6)	0.676	26 (31.3)	12 (31.6)	0.345
Ex-smoker	25	12 (19.0)	13 (22.4)		20 (24.1)	5 (13.2)
Smoker	58	29 (46.0)	29 (50.0)		37 (44.6)	21 (55.2)
p16 IHC status
Negative	29	6 (9.5)	23 (39.7)	< 0.001	15 (18.1)	14 (36.8)	0.038
Positive	92	57 (90.5)	35 (60.3)		68 (81.9)	24 (63.2)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	81	39 (61.9)	42 (72.4)	0.250	54 (65.1)	27 (71.1)	0.541
Present	40	24 (38.1)	16 (27.6)		29 (34.9)	11 (28.9)
Perineural invasion
Absent	111	56 (88.9)	55 (94.8)	0.327	75 (90.4)	36 (94.7)	0.503
Present	10	7 (11.1)	3 (5.2)		8 (9.6)	2 (5.3)
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	101	50 (79.4)	51 (87.9)	0.230	69 (83.1)	32 (84.2)	> 0.999
pT3-4	20	13 (20.6)	7 (12.1)		14 (16.9)	6 (15.8)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	23	12 (19.0)	11 (19.0)	> 0.999	18 (21.7)	5 (13.2)	0.325
Present	98	51 (81.0)	47 (81.0)		65 (78.3)	33 (86.8)
Perinodal soft tissue extension^a)
Absent	22	13 (32.5)	9 (31.0)	> 0.999	13 (27.7)	9 (40.9)	0.284
Present	47	27 (67.5)	20 (69.0)		34 (72.3)	13 (59.1)

Values are presented as number (%). HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

^a) The perinodal soft tissue extension status was evaluated in 69 oropharyngeal HNSCC cases.

Table 3.

Clinicopathological characteristics of 270 non-oropharyngeal HNSCCs according to Trk expression status

Variable	No. (n=270)^a)	TrkA expression		p-value	panTrk expression		p-value
Variable	No. (n=270)^a)	High (n=97)	Low (n=173)	p-value	High (n=86)	Low (n=184)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 58	133	49 (50.5)	84 (48.6)	0.800	35 (40.7)	98 (53.3)	0.067
≥ 58	137	48 (49.5)	89 (51.4)		51 (59.3)	86 (46.7)
Sex
Female	77	32 (33.0)	45 (26.0)	0.261	20 (23.3)	57 (31.0)	0.247
Male	193	65 (67.0)	128 (74.0)		66 (76.7)	127 (69.0)
Smoking
Non-smoker	113	48 (49.5)	65 (37.6)	0.163	29 (33.7)	84 (45.7)	0.180
Ex-smoker	55	17 (17.5)	38 (22.0)		20 (23.3)	35 (19.0)
Smoker	102	32 (33.0)	70 (40.5)		37 (43.0)	65 (35.3)
p16 IHC status
Negative	240	82 (84.5)	158 (91.3)	0.107	71 (82.6)	169 (91.8)	0.036
Positive	30	15 (15.5)	15 (8.7)		15 (17.4)	15 (8.2)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	234	79 (81.4)	155 (89.6)	0.064	65 (75.6)	169 (91.8)	< 0.001
Present	36	18 (18.6)	18 (10.4)		21 (24.4)	15 (8.2)
Perineural invasion
Absent	226	76 (78.4)	150 (86.7)	0.087	64 (74.4)	162 (88.0)	0.007
Present	44	21 (21.6)	23 (13.3)		22 (25.6)	22 (12.0)
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	220	78 (80.4)	142 (82.1)	0.746	64 (74.4)	156 (84.8)	0.045
pT3-4	50	19 (19.6)	31 (17.9)		22 (25.6)	28 (15.2)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	149	50 (51.5)	99 (57.2)	> 0.999	35 (40.7)	114 (62.0)	0.002
Present	121	47 (48.5)	74 (42.8)		51 (59.3)	70 (38.0)
Perinodal soft tissue extension^b)
Absent	30	12 (37.5)	18 (37.5)	> 0.999	11 (32.4)	19 (41.3)	0.487
Present	50	20 (62.5)	30 (62.5)		23 (67.6)	27 (58.7)

Values are presented as number (%). HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

^a) Trk immunohistochemistry was performed in all 275 cases but five cases could not be interpreted because of a damaged core,

^b) The perinodal soft tissue extension status was evaluated in 80 non-oropharyngeal HNSCC cases.

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of RFS and OS in R0 resected oropharyngeal HNSCC (n=82)

Variable	OS				RFS
	Univariate		Multivariate		Univariate		Multivariate
	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value
Age (yr)^a)
< 58	1		-		1		-
≥ 58	0.414 (0.076-2.264)	0.309	-	-	0.978 (0.297-3.217)	0.970	-	-
Sex
Female	1		-		1		-
Male	3.291 (0.097-112.2)	0.508	-	-	3.395 (0.285-48.89)	0.333	-	-
Smoking
Non-smoker	1		-		1		-
Ex-smoker	2.220 (0.070-70.69)	0.652	-	-	1.526 (0.081-28.82)	0.778	-	-
Smoker	6.063 (0.369-99.61)	0.207	-	-	8.095 (0.934-70.13)	0.058	-	-
p16 IHC status
Negative	1		1		1		1
Positive	0.135 (0.022-0.828)	0.030	0.192 (0.034-1.092)	0.063	0.281 (0.084-0.939)	0.039	0.281 (0.083-0.953)	0.042
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	1		-		1		-
Present	0.486 (0.057-4.158)	0.510	-	-	1.476 (0.431-5.058)	0.536	-	-
Perineural invasion
Absent	1		-		1		-
Present	0.346 (0.001-101.0)	0.714	-	-	0.345 (0.005-22.01)	0.616	-	-
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	1		1		1		1
pT3-4	11.65 (2.327-58.34)	0.003	11.305 (2.173-58.803)	0.004	7.038 (2.048-24.19)	0.002	7.041 (2.023-24.51)	0.002
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	1		-		1		-
Present	1.592 (0.185-13.723)	0.657	-	-	1.322 (0.285-6.132)	0.713	-	-
TrkA expression
Low	1		-		1		-
High	0.021 (0.000-18.39)	0.265	-	-	0.144 (0.018-1.126)	0.065	-	-
TrkB expression
Low	1		-		1		-
High	0.838 (0.152-4.630)	0.839	-	-	0.655 (0.173-2.478)	0.533	-	-
PanTrk expression
Low	1		-		1		-
High	0.416 (0.084-2.060)	0.282	-	-	0.466 (0.142-1.531)	0.208	-	-

RFS, recurrence-free survival; OS, overall survival; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

^a) Median age of 82 patients was 58.0 years.

REFERENCES

1. Chaturvedi AK, Anderson WF, Lortet-Tieulent J, Curado MP, Ferlay J, Franceschi S, et al. Worldwide trends in incidence rates for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4550–9. Article PubMed PMC
2. Sun S, Wang Z. Head neck squamous cell carcinoma c-Met(+) cells display cancer stem cell properties and are responsible for cisplatin-resistance and metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2337–48. Article PubMed
3. Hamilton D, Khan MK, O'Hara J, Paleri V. The changing landscape of oropharyngeal cancer management. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131:3–7. Article PubMed
4. Westra WH, Lewis JS Jr. Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumours: oropharynx. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11:41–7. Article PubMed PMC PDF
5. Westra WH, Boy S, El-Mofty SK, Gillison M, Schwartz MR, Syrjanen S, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma, HPV-positive. In: El-Naggar AK, Chan JK, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, editors. WHO classification of head and neck tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017. p. 136–8.
6. Lewis JS Jr, Beadle B, Bishop JA, Chernock RD, Colasacco C, Lacchetti C, et al. Human papillomavirus testing in head and neck carcinomas: guideline from the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:559–97. Article PubMed
7. Fakhry C, Lacchetti C, Rooper LM, Jordan RC, Rischin D, Sturgis EM, et al. Human papillomavirus testing in head and neck carcinomas: ASCO clinical practice guideline endorsement of the College of American Pathologists guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3152–61. Article PubMed
8. Thiele CJ, Li Z, McKee AE. On Trk--the TrkB signal transduction pathway is an increasingly important target in cancer biology. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5962–7. Article PubMed PMC
9. Kupferman ME, Jiffar T, El-Naggar A, Yilmaz T, Zhou G, Xie T, et al. TrkB induces EMT and has a key role in invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2010;29:2047–59. Article PubMed PMC PDF
10. Zhu L, Werner JA, Mandic R. Implications of tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) in head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:3121–6. PubMed
11. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
12. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D. World Health Organization classfication of tumours: pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005.
13. Cho YA, Kim EK, Heo SJ, Cho BC, Kim HR, Chung JM, et al. Alteration status and prognostic value of MET in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer. 2016;7:2197–206. Article PubMed PMC
14. Yun S, Koh JM, Lee KS, Seo AN, Nam KH, Choe G. Expression of c-MET in invasive meningioma. J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49:44–51. Article PubMed PMC PDF
15. Shin JH, Kim CJ, Jeon EJ, Sung CO, Shin HJ, Choi J, et al. Overexpression of C-reactive protein as a poor prognostic marker of resectable hepatocellular carcinomas. J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49:105–11. Article PubMed PMC PDF
16. Park E, Park SY, Kim H, Sun PL, Jin Y, Cho SK, et al. Membranous insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) expression is predictive of poor prognosis in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49:382–8. Article PubMed PMC PDF
17. Bishop JA, Ma XJ, Wang H, Luo Y, Illei PB, Begum S, et al. Detection of transcriptionally active high-risk HPV in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as visualized by a novel E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization method. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1874–82. Article PubMed PMC
18. Mirghani H, Casiraghi O, Amen F, He M, Ma XJ, Saulnier P, et al. Diagnosis of HPV-driven head and neck cancer with a single test in routine clinical practice. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:1518–27. Article PubMed PDF
19. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan PF, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:24–35. Article PubMed PMC
20. Lewis JS Jr, Chernock RD, Ma XJ, Flanagan JJ, Luo Y, Gao G, et al. Partial p16 staining in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: extent and pattern correlate with human papillomavirus RNA status. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1212–20. Article PubMed PDF
21. Castellsague X, Alemany L, Quer M, Halec G, Quiros B, Tous S, et al. HPV involvement in head and neck cancers: comprehensive assessment of biomarkers in 3680 patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv403.Article PubMed PDF
22. Lewis JS Jr. p16 immunohistochemistry as a standalone test for risk stratification in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6 Suppl 1:S75–82. Article PubMed PDF
23. Choi Y, Won YJ, Lee S, Kim A, Kim Y, Park WY, et al. Cytoplasmic TrkA expression as a screen for detecting NTRK1 fusions in colorectal cancer. Transl Oncol. 2018;11:764–70. Article PubMed PMC
24. Hechtman JF, Benayed R, Hyman DM, Drilon A, Zehir A, Frosina D, et al. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry is an efficient and reliable screen for the detection of NTRK fusions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1547–51. Article PubMed PMC
25. Mauri G, Valtorta E, Cerea G, Amatu A, Schirru M, Marrapese G, et al. TRKA expression and NTRK1 gene copy number across solid tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71:926–31. Article PubMed
26. Ndiaye C, Mena M, Alemany L, Arbyn M, Castellsague X, Laporte L, et al. HPV DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16INK4a detection in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1319–31. Article PubMed
27. Nevens D, Nuyts S. HPV-positive head and neck tumours, a distinct clinical entity. B-ENT. 2015;11:81–7. PubMed
28. Lee SJ, Li GG, Kim ST, Hong ME, Jang J, Yoon N, et al. NTRK1 rearrangement in colorectal cancer patients: evidence for actionable target using patient-derived tumor cell line. Oncotarget. 2015;6:39028–35. Article PubMed PMC
29. Feller L, Wood NH, Khammissa RA, Lemmer J. Human papillomavirus-mediated carcinogenesis and HPV-associated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Part 2: Human papillomavirus associated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Face Med. 2010;6:15.Article PubMed PMC PDF
30. Shan C, Wei J, Hou R, Wu B, Yang Z, Wang L, et al. Schwann cells promote EMT and the Schwann-like differentiation of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma cells via the BDNF/TrkB axis. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:427–35. Article PubMed
31. Sclabas GM, Fujioka S, Schmidt C, Li Z, Frederick WA, Yang W, et al. Overexpression of tropomysin-related kinase B in metastatic human pancreatic cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(2 Pt 1):440–9. Article PubMed PDF
32. Lee J, Jiffar T, Kupferman ME. A novel role for BDNF-TrkB in the regulation of chemotherapy resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30246Article PubMed PMC
33. Yilmaz T, Jiffar T, de la Garza G, Lin H, Milas Z, Takahashi Y, et al. Theraputic targeting of Trk supresses tumor proliferation and enhances cisplatin activity in HNSCC. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:644–53. Article PubMed PMC
34. Pearse RN, Swendeman SL, Li Y, Rafii D, Hempstead BL. A neurotrophin axis in myeloma: TrkB and BDNF promote tumor-cell survival. Blood. 2005;105:4429–36. Article PubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

NTRK Gene Expression Analysis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mexican Population
Lilibeth Stephania Escoto-Vasquez, Javier Portilla-Robertson, Josué Orlando Ramírez-Jarquín, Luis Fernando Jacinto-Alemán, Alejandro Alonso-Moctezuma, Carla Monserrat Ramírez-Martínez, Osmar Alejandro Chanes-Cuevas, Fabiola Salgado-Chavarria
Dentistry Journal.2024; 12(10): 327. CrossRef
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of depth of invasion in tongue carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Kondajji Ramachandra Vijayalakshmi, Vanshika Jain
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery.2023; 14(3): 341. CrossRef
CYLD Alterations in the Tumorigenesis and Progression of Human Papillomavirus–Associated Head and Neck Cancers
Zhibin Cui, Hyunseok Kang, Jennifer R. Grandis, Daniel E. Johnson
Molecular Cancer Research.2021; 19(1): 14. CrossRef
Genome-wide analysis identifies critical DNA methylations within NTRKs genes in colorectal cancer
Zijian Chen, Zenghong Huang, Yanxin Luo, Qi Zou, Liangliang Bai, Guannan Tang, Xiaolin Wang, Guangwen Cao, Meijin Huang, Jun Xiang, Huichuan Yu
Journal of Translational Medicine.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Ferroportin and FBXL5 as Prognostic Markers in Advanced Stage Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Cheol Keun Park, Jayoon Heo, Won Sik Ham, Young-Deuk Choi, Sang Joon Shin, Nam Hoon Cho
Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(4): 1174. CrossRef
Clinical Significance of Trk Receptor Expression as a New Therapeutic Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Sangjoon Choi, Sujin Park, Yoon Ah Cho, Cheol-Keun Park, Sang Yun Ha
Pathology & Oncology Research.2020; 26(4): 2587. CrossRef
Overexpression of wild type or a Q311E mutant MB21D2 promotes a pro‐oncogenic phenotype in HNSCC
Daniel E. Gracilla, Praveen Kumar Korla, Ming‐Tsung Lai, An‐Jen Chiang, Wen‐Shiung Liou, Jim Jinn‐Chyuan Sheu
Molecular Oncology.2020; 14(12): 3065. CrossRef
NOVA1 induction by inflammation and NOVA1 suppression by epigenetic regulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Eun Kyung Kim, Yoon Ah Cho, Mi-kyoung Seo, Hyunmi Ryu, Byoung Chul Cho, Yoon Woo Koh, Sun Och Yoon
Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma arising in young patients: Particular focus on molecular alteration and tumor immunity
Hyang Joo Ryu, Eun Kyung Kim, Byoung Chul Cho, Sun Och Yoon
Head & Neck.2019; 41(1): 198. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Investigating Trk Protein Expression between Oropharyngeal and Non-oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Possible Roles of Human Papillomavirus Infection

Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1052-1063. Published online October 24, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.411

XML Download

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Electronic Supplementary Material
NOTES
REFERENCES

Investigating Trk Protein Expression between Oropharyngeal and Non-oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Possible Roles of Human Papillomavirus Infection

Fig. 1. Expression pattern of Trk protein and p16 using immunohistochemistry (×200). Representative expression as assessed by Trk immunohistochemistry: Trk showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells. The four cases shown had different intensities of Trk expression in all tumor cells. (A) Negative, H-score 0. (B) Intensity 1, H-score 100. (C) Intensity 2, H-score 200. (D) Intensity 3, H-score 300. Strong and diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining of p16 immunohistochemical staining (E) and negative staining was observed (F).

Fig. 2. Expression of Trk protein in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas according to anatomical location and p16 status. (A) H-scores of TrkA and panTrk were significantly higher at oropharyngeal sites than non-oropharyngeal areas (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in H-scores of TrkB according to anatomical site. (B) H-scores of TrkA and panTrk were higher in p16 positive cases than p16 negative cases. No significant difference was observed in the H-score of TrkB between p16 positive cases and p16 negative cases.

Fig. 3. Alteration of TrkA and TrkB expression and proliferation ability by HPV-16 oncogene. (A) Increased level of TrkA mRNA 48 hours after transfection in FaDu cell line. (B) Increased level of TrkA mRNA 48 hours after transfection in CAL-27 cell-line. (C) Slight decreased level of TrkB mRNA in FaDu cell line. (D) Decreased level of TrkB in CAL27 cell line. Increased level of TrkC mRNA 48 hours after transfection in FaDu cell line (E) and CAL27 cell line (F). CTR, transfection with empty vector; HPV, transfection with HPV-16 oncogene.

Fig. 4. Kaplan-Meier analysis of R0-resected head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in aspect of anatomical sites. (A) In the analysis of 300 R0 resected cases, TrkA high expression group tended to have a longer overall survival (OS) than the Trk low expression group (p=0.060). (B) No significant difference was observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to TrkA expression status (p=0.348). (C) In the analysis of 82 R0 resected oropharyngeal SCCs, TrkA high group had a significantly longer OS than the TrkA low expression group (p=0.044). (D) In addition, the TrkA high group showed longer RFS than the TrkA low expression group (p=0.032). (E) In 180 R0 resected oral cavity SCCs, high panTrk expression tended to be related to poor OS (p=0.065). (F) Furthermore, the high panTrk group showed a significantly inferior RFS than the low panTrk group (p=0.001).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Investigating Trk Protein Expression between Oropharyngeal and Non-oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Possible Roles of Human Papillomavirus Infection

Variable	No. (n=391)^a)	TrkA expression		p-value	panTrk expression		p-value
Variable	No. (n=391)^a)	High (n=160)	Low (n=231)	p-value	High (n=169)	Low (n=222)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 58	190	76 (47.5)	114 (49.4)	0.758	73 (43.2)	117 (52.7)	0.067
≥ 58	201	84 (52.5)	117 (50.6)		96 (56.8)	105 (47.3)
Sex
Female	97	40 (25.0)	57 (24.7)	> 0.999	34 (20.1)	63 (28.4)	0.076
Male	294	120 (75.0)	175 (75.3)		135 (79.9)	159 (71.6)
Location
Hypopharynx	28	8 (5.0)	20 (8.7)	0.011	13 (7.7)	15 (6.8)	< 0.001
Larynx	42	12 (7.5)	30 (13.0)		16 (9.5)	26 (11.7)
Oral cavity	200	77 (48.1)	123 (53.2)		57 (33.7)	143 (64.4)
Oropharynx	121	63 (39.4)	58 (25.1)		83 (49.1)	38 (17.1)
Smoking
Non-smoker	151	70 (43.8)	81 (35.1)	0.214	55 (32.5)	96 (43.2)	0.085
Ex-smoker	80	29 (18.1)	51 (22.1)		40 (23.7)	40 (18.0)
Smoker	160	61 (38.1)	99 (42.9)		74 (43.8)	86 (38.7)
p16 IHC status
Negative	269	88 (55.0)	181 (78.4)	< 0.001	86 (50.9)	183 (82.4)	< 0.001
Positive	122	72 (45.0)	50 (21.6)		83 (49.1)	39 (17.6)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	315	118 (73.8)	197 (85.3)	0.004	119 (70.4)	196 (88.3)	< 0.001
Present	76	42 (26.3)	34 (14.7)		50 (29.6)	26 (11.7)
Perineural invasion
Absent	337	132 (82.5)	205 (88.7)	0.054	139 (82.2)	198 (89.2)	0.055
Present	54	28 (17.5)	26 (11.3)		30 (17.8)	24 (10.8)
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	321	128 (80.0)	193 (83.5)	0.421	133 (78.7)	188 (84.7)	0.143
pT3-4	70	32 (20.0)	38 (16.5)		36 (21.3)	34 (15.3)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	172	62 (38.8)	110 (47.6)	0.097	53 (31.4)	119 (53.6)	< 0.001
Present	219	98 (61.3)	121 (52.4)		116 (68.6)	103 (46.4)
Perinodal soft tissue extension^b)
Absent	52	25 (34.7)	27 (35.1)	> 0.999	24 (29.6)	28 (41.2)	0.169
Present	97	47 (65.3)	50 (64.9)		57 (70.4)	40 (58.8)

Variable	No. (n=121)	TrkA expression		p-value	panTrk expression		p-value
Variable	No. (n=121)	High (n=63)	Low (n=58)	p-value	High (n=83)	Low (n=38)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 58	57	27 (42.9)	30 (51.7)	0.365	38 (45.8)	19 (50.0)	0.698
≥ 58	64	36 (57.1)	28 (48.3)		45 (54.2)	19 (50.0)
Sex
Female	20	8 (12.7)	12 (20.7)	0.328	14 (16.9)	6 (15.8)	> 0.999
Male	101	55 (87.3)	46 (79.3)		69 (83.1)	32 (84.2)
Smoking
Non-smoker	38	22 (34.9)	16 (27.6)	0.676	26 (31.3)	12 (31.6)	0.345
Ex-smoker	25	12 (19.0)	13 (22.4)		20 (24.1)	5 (13.2)
Smoker	58	29 (46.0)	29 (50.0)		37 (44.6)	21 (55.2)
p16 IHC status
Negative	29	6 (9.5)	23 (39.7)	< 0.001	15 (18.1)	14 (36.8)	0.038
Positive	92	57 (90.5)	35 (60.3)		68 (81.9)	24 (63.2)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	81	39 (61.9)	42 (72.4)	0.250	54 (65.1)	27 (71.1)	0.541
Present	40	24 (38.1)	16 (27.6)		29 (34.9)	11 (28.9)
Perineural invasion
Absent	111	56 (88.9)	55 (94.8)	0.327	75 (90.4)	36 (94.7)	0.503
Present	10	7 (11.1)	3 (5.2)		8 (9.6)	2 (5.3)
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	101	50 (79.4)	51 (87.9)	0.230	69 (83.1)	32 (84.2)	> 0.999
pT3-4	20	13 (20.6)	7 (12.1)		14 (16.9)	6 (15.8)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	23	12 (19.0)	11 (19.0)	> 0.999	18 (21.7)	5 (13.2)	0.325
Present	98	51 (81.0)	47 (81.0)		65 (78.3)	33 (86.8)
Perinodal soft tissue extension^a)
Absent	22	13 (32.5)	9 (31.0)	> 0.999	13 (27.7)	9 (40.9)	0.284
Present	47	27 (67.5)	20 (69.0)		34 (72.3)	13 (59.1)

Variable	No. (n=270)^a)	TrkA expression		p-value	panTrk expression		p-value
Variable	No. (n=270)^a)	High (n=97)	Low (n=173)	p-value	High (n=86)	Low (n=184)	p-value
Age (yr)
< 58	133	49 (50.5)	84 (48.6)	0.800	35 (40.7)	98 (53.3)	0.067
≥ 58	137	48 (49.5)	89 (51.4)		51 (59.3)	86 (46.7)
Sex
Female	77	32 (33.0)	45 (26.0)	0.261	20 (23.3)	57 (31.0)	0.247
Male	193	65 (67.0)	128 (74.0)		66 (76.7)	127 (69.0)
Smoking
Non-smoker	113	48 (49.5)	65 (37.6)	0.163	29 (33.7)	84 (45.7)	0.180
Ex-smoker	55	17 (17.5)	38 (22.0)		20 (23.3)	35 (19.0)
Smoker	102	32 (33.0)	70 (40.5)		37 (43.0)	65 (35.3)
p16 IHC status
Negative	240	82 (84.5)	158 (91.3)	0.107	71 (82.6)	169 (91.8)	0.036
Positive	30	15 (15.5)	15 (8.7)		15 (17.4)	15 (8.2)
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	234	79 (81.4)	155 (89.6)	0.064	65 (75.6)	169 (91.8)	< 0.001
Present	36	18 (18.6)	18 (10.4)		21 (24.4)	15 (8.2)
Perineural invasion
Absent	226	76 (78.4)	150 (86.7)	0.087	64 (74.4)	162 (88.0)	0.007
Present	44	21 (21.6)	23 (13.3)		22 (25.6)	22 (12.0)
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	220	78 (80.4)	142 (82.1)	0.746	64 (74.4)	156 (84.8)	0.045
pT3-4	50	19 (19.6)	31 (17.9)		22 (25.6)	28 (15.2)
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	149	50 (51.5)	99 (57.2)	> 0.999	35 (40.7)	114 (62.0)	0.002
Present	121	47 (48.5)	74 (42.8)		51 (59.3)	70 (38.0)
Perinodal soft tissue extension^b)
Absent	30	12 (37.5)	18 (37.5)	> 0.999	11 (32.4)	19 (41.3)	0.487
Present	50	20 (62.5)	30 (62.5)		23 (67.6)	27 (58.7)

Variable	OS				RFS
	Univariate		Multivariate		Univariate		Multivariate
	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value	HR (95% CI)	p-value
Age (yr)^a)
< 58	1		-		1		-
≥ 58	0.414 (0.076-2.264)	0.309	-	-	0.978 (0.297-3.217)	0.970	-	-
Sex
Female	1		-		1		-
Male	3.291 (0.097-112.2)	0.508	-	-	3.395 (0.285-48.89)	0.333	-	-
Smoking
Non-smoker	1		-		1		-
Ex-smoker	2.220 (0.070-70.69)	0.652	-	-	1.526 (0.081-28.82)	0.778	-	-
Smoker	6.063 (0.369-99.61)	0.207	-	-	8.095 (0.934-70.13)	0.058	-	-
p16 IHC status
Negative	1		1		1		1
Positive	0.135 (0.022-0.828)	0.030	0.192 (0.034-1.092)	0.063	0.281 (0.084-0.939)	0.039	0.281 (0.083-0.953)	0.042
Lymphovascular invasion
Absent	1		-		1		-
Present	0.486 (0.057-4.158)	0.510	-	-	1.476 (0.431-5.058)	0.536	-	-
Perineural invasion
Absent	1		-		1		-
Present	0.346 (0.001-101.0)	0.714	-	-	0.345 (0.005-22.01)	0.616	-	-
Pathologic T category
pT1-2	1		1		1		1
pT3-4	11.65 (2.327-58.34)	0.003	11.305 (2.173-58.803)	0.004	7.038 (2.048-24.19)	0.002	7.041 (2.023-24.51)	0.002
Lymph node metastasis
Absent	1		-		1		-
Present	1.592 (0.185-13.723)	0.657	-	-	1.322 (0.285-6.132)	0.713	-	-
TrkA expression
Low	1		-		1		-
High	0.021 (0.000-18.39)	0.265	-	-	0.144 (0.018-1.126)	0.065	-	-
TrkB expression
Low	1		-		1		-
High	0.838 (0.152-4.630)	0.839	-	-	0.655 (0.173-2.478)	0.533	-	-
PanTrk expression
Low	1		-		1		-
High	0.416 (0.084-2.060)	0.282	-	-	0.466 (0.142-1.531)	0.208	-	-

Table 1. Clinicopathological characteristics of 391 HNSCCs according to TrkA and panTrk expression status

Values are presented as number (%). HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

TrkA and PanTrk immunohistochemistry was performed in all 396 cases but five cases could not be interpreted because of a damaged core,

The perinodal soft tissue extension status was evaluated in 149 HNSCC cases.

Table 2. Clinicopathological characteristics of 121 oropharyngeal HNSCCs according to TrkA and panTrk expression status

Values are presented as number (%). HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

The perinodal soft tissue extension status was evaluated in 69 oropharyngeal HNSCC cases.

Table 3. Clinicopathological characteristics of 270 non-oropharyngeal HNSCCs according to Trk expression status

Values are presented as number (%). HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Trk immunohistochemistry was performed in all 275 cases but five cases could not be interpreted because of a damaged core,

The perinodal soft tissue extension status was evaluated in 80 non-oropharyngeal HNSCC cases.

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis of RFS and OS in R0 resected oropharyngeal HNSCC (n=82)

RFS, recurrence-free survival; OS, overall survival; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IHC, immunohistochemistry.