Clinical Features of Male Breast Cancer: Experiences from Seven Institutions Over 20 Years

Ji Hyung Hong; Kyung Sun Ha; Yun Hwa Jung; Hye Sung Won; Ho Jung An; Guk Jin Lee; Donghoon Kang; Ji Chan Park; Sarah Park; Jae Ho Byun; Young Jin Suh; Jeong Soo Kim; Woo Chan Park; Sang Seol Jung; Il Young Park; Su-Mi Chung; In Sook Woo

doi:10.4143/crt.2015.410

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 48(4); 2016 > Article

Original Article Clinical Features of Male Breast Cancer: Experiences from Seven Institutions Over 20 Years: Ji Hyung Hong, MD, PhD¹, Kyung Sun Ha, MD², Yun Hwa Jung, MD³, Hye Sung Won, MD, PhD⁴, Ho Jung An, MD, PhD⁵, Guk Jin Lee, MD⁶, Donghoon Kang, MD², Ji Chan Park, MD⁷, Sarah Park, MD, PhD², Jae Ho Byun, MD, PhD¹, Young Jin Suh, MD, PhD⁸, Jeong Soo Kim, MD, PhD⁹, Woo Chan Park, MD, PhD¹⁰, Sang Seol Jung, MD, PhD¹¹, Il Young Park, MD, PhD¹², Su-Mi Chung, MD, PhD¹³, In Sook Woo, MD, PhD^3,; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2016;48(4):1389-1398.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.410
Published online: April 11, 2016

¹Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea

²Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea

³Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea

⁴Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Korea

⁵Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea

⁶Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Bucheon, Korea

⁷Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, Daejeon, Korea

⁸Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea

⁹Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Korea

¹⁰Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea

¹¹Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea

¹²Department of Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Bucheon, Korea

¹³Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: In Sook Woo, MD, PhD Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 10 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07345, Korea
Tel: 82-2-3779-1574 Fax: 82-2-780-3132 E-mail: insookwoo@catholic.ac.kr

• Received: October 26, 2015 • Accepted: March 22, 2016

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

14,409 Views
249 Download
36 Web of Science
34 Crossref
40 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
Breast cancer treatment has progressed significantly over the past 20 years. However, knowledge regarding male breast cancer (MBC) is sparse because of its rarity. This study is an investigation of the clinicopathologic features, treatments, and clinical outcomes of MBC.
Materials and Methods
Clinical records of 59 MBC patients diagnosed during 1995-2014 from seven institutions in Korea were reviewed retrospectively.
Results
Over a 20-year period, MBC patients accounted for 0.98% among total breast cancer patients, and increased every 5 years. The median age of MBC patientswas 66 years (range, 24 to 87 years). Forty-three patients (73%) complained of a palpable breast mass initially. The median symptom duration was 5 months (range, 1 to 36 months). Mastectomy was performed in 96% of the patients. The most frequent histology was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (75%). Ninety-one percent of tumors (38/43) were estrogen receptor–positive, and 28% (11/40) showed epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) overexpression. After curative surgery, 42% of patients (19/45) received adjuvant chemotherapy; 77% (27/35) received hormone therapy. Five out of ten patients with HER-2 overexpressing tumors did not receive adjuvant anti–HER-2 therapy, while two out of four patients with HER-2 overexpressing tumors received palliative trastuzumab for recurrent and metastatic disease. Letrozole was used for one patient in the palliative setting. The median overall survival durations were 7.2 years (range, 0.6 to 17.0 years) in patients with localized disease and 2.9 years (range, 0.6 to 4.3 years) in those with recurrent or metastatic disease.
Conclusion
Anti–HER-2 and hormonal therapy, except tamoxifen, have been underutilized in Korean MBC patients compared to female breast cancer patients. With the development of precision medicine, active treatment with targeted agents should be applied. Further investigation of the unique pathobiology of MBC is clinically warranted.
Key words: Male breast neoplasms, Survival, Prognosis

Introduction

Since the early 2000s, the incidence of female breast cancer (FBC) in the United States has been decreasing, a phenomenon attributed to a decline in the use of hormone replacement therapy among postmenopausal women [1]. In contrast, according to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result and the United Kingdom Association of Cancer Registries databases, between the 1970s and 2000s, the incidence of male breast cancer (MBC) increased from 0.1% to 1% [2,3]. In Korea, according to the annual report of cancer statistics, the incidence of MBC increased from 0.041% in 1999 to 0.068% in 2012 [4]. Furthermore, studies indicate that the incidence of MBC in Korea was as high as 0.27%-0.58% [5-7].

Because MBC is rare, the general treatment approaches for MBC are based upon those for FBC [8]. Since the development of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)–targeted agents such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, trastuzumab-DM1, and lapatinib, and hormone agents such as aromatase inhibitors, the treatment outcomes for FBC have improved remarkably. However, these treatments have not been fully implemented in MBC patients because of the lack of clinical trials investigating MBC, as well as concerns that the tumor biology may be different between the sexes. Moreover, studies have reported contradictory treatment outcomes between MBC and FBC patients [9-11].

In the present study, we analyzed data from seven Korean institutions, spanning a 20-year period, to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes of MBC patients in the modern treatment era. The treatment outcomes and prognostic factors affecting survival were also evaluated.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients

Among 6,000 patients with breast cancer treated between 1995 and 2014 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (Seoul, Korea), Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital (Seoul, Korea), Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital (Incheon, Korea), Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital (Uijeongbu, Korea), Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital (Bucheon, Korea), St. Vincent’s Hospital (Suwon, Korea), and Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital (Daejeon, Korea), data for 59 MBC patients were collected for analysis (Fig. 1).

The patients’ medical records were reviewed in July 2015 to obtain the age at diagnosis, complaints at the time of diagnosis, symptom duration, family history of cancer, marital status, smoking habits, alcohol intake, pathologic features, treatments, and clinical course of the disease. Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of The Catholic Medical Center (No. XC15RIMI0046O). The informed consent was waived because of its retrospective design of the study.

2. Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 19.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics are presented for the baseline characteristics. To compare two groups, we used the chi-square test for categorical variables, the t test for continuous variables, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test when the assumption of normality was questionable. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval from the date of diagnosis to that of death from any cause or the last follow-up date. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time interval between the date of diagnosis and that of the first recurrence or death from any cause. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the risk of death. All p-values presented are two-sided, and p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

1. Patient characteristics

The baseline patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median symptom duration was 5 months (range, 1 to 36 months). Left-sided tumors accounted for 53% of cases. The most common complaint at diagnosis was a palpable breast mass. The majority of patients had stage II, clinical (c) T1, and cN0 disease at the time of diagnosis. In the six patients who had a family history of breast cancer, the age at onset of the disease tended to be earlier than in those who did not have a family history of the disease (52.3 years vs. 65.4 years, p=0.051). There were no differences in the tumor grade, hormone receptor (HR) positivity, or HER-2 overexpression status between patients with or without a family history of breast cancer. Among patients with initial stage IV disease, four demonstrated bone metastases and one demonstrated apparent liver metastasis.

2. Histopathology

The histopathological characteristics are in Table 2. The most common MBC histological subtype was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (74.5%). Most tumors showed poor or moderate differentiation (35.6%/37.3%). The pathologic (p) T classification data was available for 51 tumors, and most of them were pT1 or pT2. The median tumor diameter was 2.0 cm (range, 0.4 to 9.0 cm). The median number of lymph nodes removed during surgery was 10 (range, 0 to 35). Nineteen patients had pathologically positive lymph nodes, and the mean number of involved lymph nodes was 1.3 (standard deviation, 2.6; range, 0 to 11). Eighteen of 59 patients had histologic evidence of lymphatic invasion.

Among the 42 patients with available data, 90.5% were positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and 64.3% for progesterone receptor (PR) expression. All PR-positive patients were ER-positive. Of the 40 patients with HER-2 expression data obtained using immunohistochemical or fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses, 27.5% showed HER-2 overexpression. There were no differences in the age distribution, family history of breast cancer, alcohol intake, smoking, and disease stage according to the HR positivity and HER-2 overexpression statuses.

3. Surgery and adjuvant treatment

Details of the treatments administered are in Table 3. Fifty patients underwent curative surgery, including modified radical mastectomy or total mastectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated for node-positive tumors or tumors > 1 cm in size, and 19 of 45 (42.2%) such patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Of these 19 patients, 15 received anthracycline-based regimens, as follows: seven received adriamycin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel; five received fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide; one received epirubicin and docetaxel; one received epirubicin and carboplatin; and one underwent adriamycin monotherapy. Two patients were administered a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. One patient received paclitaxel monotherapy and another received oral fluorouracil monotherapy. There were no differences in the age distribution, family history of breast cancer, alcohol intake, smoking, and stage between patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Node-positive disease was observed more frequently in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.007).

Among 35 patients with HR-positive tumors after curative surgery, 27 (77.1%) received adjuvant hormone therapy. One patient did not undergo any adjuvant treatment because of poor compliance. Eleven patients recieved both adjuvant chemotherapy and hormone treatment. In seven patients, the reason for not administering adjuvant hormone treatment was not identified owing to insufficient medical records. There were no differences in the age distribution, family history of breast cancer, alcohol intake, and stage between patients treated with and without adjuvant hormone treatment. However, alcohol consumption was observed more frequently in patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy (p=0.019). Among 10 patients with HER-2 overexpressing tumors, five were indicated for adjuvant trastuzumab; however, they did not receive trastuzumab.

4. Recurrence and palliative treatment

Eleven patients (22.0%) with localized disease who underwent curative surgery had recurrence at the time of analysis. The most frequent recurrence site was the bone (7 patients, 63.6%), followed by the lungs/pleura (5, 45.5%) and brain (2, 18.2%). Local relapse involving the lymph nodes occurred in three patients (27.3%). HR-positive tumors occurred in 54.5% (6/11) and 18.2% (2/11) of patients with recurrence had HER-2 overexpressing tumors. Between patients who experienced recurrence and those who did not, there were no differences in the HR positivity and HER-2 overexpression status.

In patients with initial stage IV disease, the most frequent metastatic site was the bone (4 patients), followed by the lymph node, liver, and pericardium (1 patient each). In the 16 patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, 13 (81.3%) received palliative treatment. Two patients did not receive anti-cancer treatment because of underlying pneumonia and poor performance status. One patient refused treatment and received best supportive care. In the four patients diagnosed with HER-2 overexpressing disseminated tumors, two received HER-2 targeted palliative treatment. Among eight patients with HR-positive tumors, one patient, who experienced multiple bone metastases under adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen, received palliative letrozole alone without gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or orchiectomy, surviving 21 months progression-free. Five patients received palliative chemotherapy after progression under hormone therapy. One patient did not receive any treatment.

5. Survival outcomes

Eleven patients (18.7%) had died at the time of analysis. The median OS of the 59 patients was 6.3 years (range, 0.6 to 17.0 years). The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 62% and 44% (Fig. 2A). The median OS and DFS in patients with localized disease were 7.2 years (range, 0.6 to 17.0 years) and 2.9 years (range, 0.6 to 4.3 years). The 5- and 10-year OS rates for patients with localized disease were 66% and 47% (Fig. 2B). The 5- and 10-year DFS rates for patients with localized disease were 57% and 43% (Fig. 2C). The median OS in patients with metastatic disease was 2.9 years (range, 0.6 to 4.3 years), with 50% of the 3-year OS rates.

A family history of breast cancer, alcohol intake, smoking, age, and axillary lymph node involvement did not affect the OS or DFS. There was no difference in OS between patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy among the indicated patients (p=0.081 and p=0.218, respectively).

In patients with positive HR status, there was no significant difference in DFS between patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy and those who did not (p=0.636). However, in terms of OS, adjuvant hormone therapy improved survival in patients with positive HR status (8.5 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49 to 12.58 vs. 4.2 years; 95% CI, 3.09 to 5.29; p=0.047).

6. Factors associated with OS

The Cox regression analysis of the factors associated with OS is shown in Table 4. Stage was the only factor significantly associated with survival (p=0.034) in the univariate analysis. Patients with early stage and locally advanced breast cancer showed better OS than those with metastatic disease (9.9 years; 95% CI, 7.97 to 11.97 vs. 2.8 years; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.51; p=0.019). The HR and HER-2 overexpression status had no effect on the OS (p=0.087 and p=0.280, respectively).

Discussion

In the present study, over a 20-year period, MBC patients were detected in 0.98% of total breast cancer patients across seven institutions in Korea. The global incidence rates of MBC vary widely by location and ethnicity. In Japan, the rate is reported at 0.49%; in the United States and Europe, it is 1%; and across African nations, it is reported at 5%-15% [2,3,9,12]. As the global population ages and diagnostic techniques improve, the global incidence rate of MBC continues to rise.

The distinct histologic characteristics and related biology of MBC compared with FBC have not been fully described, and, therefore, knowledge is still lacking regarding MBC.

The median age of MBC onset in our study, 66 years, was consistent with the literature (62-69 years), and is much later than that reported for FBC (< 50 years) [10,12]. This late onset might be due to a lack of awareness of the early signs of MBC, which may lead to delayed screening and diagnosis [10]. The median symptom duration was reported as 18.6 months by Baek et al. [5] and 13 months by Cho et al. [6], longer than the median duration of 5 months in the present study. This prolonged period of symptom duration likely contributes to the differences in stage distribution between MBC and FBC patients and may be the reason why metastatic disease is more frequently detected at the time of diagnosis in MBC patients. The rate of disseminated disease in the present study (8.5%) was similar to that reported by Nahleh et al. [13] (8.9%) and Miao et al. [10] (10.9%), whereas the rate for FBC patients was lower (5%-6%).

The rate of familial breast cancer in MBC is reported as 15%-20%, higher than for FBC (7%) [8,14]. In the present study, MBC patients with a family history of breast cancer (8.5%) had earlier disease onset compared to MBC patients without a family history, although the difference was not significant. Other clinicopathologic features, as well as survival, were not different by family history. These findings were consistent with those of Hill et al. [14], who did not find any significant effect of family history on stage at diagnosis or survival outcome in MBC patients. Meanwhile, according to Ottini et al. [15], MBC patients with BRCA2 mutations were more likely to have a family history of breast or ovarian cancers, higher tumor grades, and HER-2 overexpression when compared to those with BRCA1 mutations [15]. Further studies evaluating the BRCA1/2 mutation status in MBC are clinically warranted to understand the genotype-phenotype correlations in MBC patients.

HER-2 overexpression occurs in approximately 25% of FBC cases, and there are contradictory reports about the rate of HER-2 overexpression in MBC. Some researchers suggest that the HER-2 overexpression rates in MBC patients may be higher (30%-56%) than thoses in FBC patients [16], while others report lower HER-2 overexpression rates in MBC patients (2%-18%) [8,17]. According to Park et al. [18], among 10 Korean MBC patients, five (50%) demonstrated HER-2 overexpression. Furthermore, Cho et al. [6] showed that four of 14 MBC patients (28.5%) had HER-2 overexpression. In the present study, 11 of 40 MBC patients (27.5%) overexpressed HER-2. Discrepancies in the HER-2 overexpression rates between these studies are likely explained by the small study populations of each study as well as heterogeneity in the included stages and ethnicities and epidemiological differences.

Since a regression of metastasis after orchiectomy was firstly reported in 1942, orchiectomy has become the standard treatment for advanced disease in MBC and results in a 55% response rate [19]. Following reports of substantial response with anti-estrogen, hormonal therapy is an appealing alternative to surgery, avoiding psychological, morbidity, and mortality risks associated with surgery [20]. Tamoxifen is the standard treatment for adjuvant hormonal therapy over aromatase inhibitor in MBC as well as for metastatic disease. The efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in MBC is ambivalent because of differences in estrogen repression between the sexes. Administration of anastrozole in healthy young men reduced estradiol concentrations by only 50%, limiting the anti-tumor effect of anastrozole, whereas in women, it completely suppressed estrogen levels [21]. In a study of Zagouri et al. [22] with 23 metastatic MBC patients, no significant effects of combination of GnRH analogue and aromatase inhibitor were noted on OS and progression-free survival (PFS). In contrary, in a larger study of 60 metastatic MBC patients, patients treated with aromatase inhibitor in combination with GnRH analogues showed better PFS and OS compared with aromatase inhibitor alone [23]. Currently, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines suggest that in men with advanced breast cancer, the use of aromatase inhibitors is ineffective without concomitant suppression of testicular steroidogenesis [24]. Interestingly, in our study, one patient with recurrence of multiple bone metastases was on letrozole for 21 months and survived for 90 months after recurrence.

Some studies suggest that MBC has a worse outcome than FBC [11]. The presumption is that the small volume of breast tissue in men, which would permit cancer cells easy access to the lymphatic system and direct extension to the muscles and chest wall, leads to high recurrence rates of cancer [11]. Another explanation could be that MBC is initially diagnosed at a much later age, and that these patients are more likely to have a higher risk of cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities [8,9]. Similarly, because of the advanced age, the use of radiotherapy is more limited in MBC patients compared with in FBC patients [8,9]. Delayed diagnosis and treatment, and a lack of knowledge of the unique characteristics of MBC could result in a less favorable prognosis for MBC patients compared with FBC patients. Estimates for 5-year survival for MBC patients are reported at 40%-65%, which was similar to 62% of our present study [9]. However, some studies evaluating age- and stage-matched patients did not find any significant survival differences between MBC and FBC patients [9,10].

The strengths of the present study are the large sample size and the long-term survival data for MBC patients compared to previous reports in Korea. The Korean male population is well represented because the data were collected from seven institutions, including two tertiary referral and five community hospitals, which provide medical services to mixed urban and rural populations.

However, the study has limitations, including the lack of information regarding molecular characteristics such as BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and the p53 status. In addition, the pathologic data were collected in a retrospective manner and could not be reviewed for each patient.

At present, the systemic treatment guideline recommended for MBC is almost the same as that for postmenopausal FBC. However, according to this study, other hormonal agents, except tamoxifen and anti–HER-2 therapy, have been underutilized in MBC patients compared with FBC. The reason may be that many of the therapeutic agents used for breast cancer have been specified for FBC, as there is little clinical trial evidence for MBC and therefore limitation of national insurance guidelines. It is logistically difficult to perform prospective randomized clinical trials for the development of the therapeutic regimens for MBC because of paucity of cases. Therefore, the physician and patient should be aware of these limitations and follow a more active approach for treating this disease.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this study, the HR-positive rate was higher in patients with MBC compared to that reported in patients with FBC, whereas the HER-2 overexpression rate was similar. The survival outcomes in MBC patients were similar to those reported in FBC patients. Personalized treatment should be performed for MBC in concordance with the advances in the treatment of FBC.

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Fig. 1.

Patients diagram. FBC, female breast cancer; MBC, male breast cancer; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; LN, lymph node.

Fig. 2.

(A) Overall survival (OS) of total male patients with breast cancer. (B) OS of male patients with localized breast cancer. (C) Disease-free survival (DFS) of male patients with localized breast cancer.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=59)
Age at diagnosis, median (range, yr)	66 (24-87)
Diagnosis period
1995-1999	8 (13.6)
2000-2004	13 (22.0)
2005-2010	17 (28.8)
2010-2014	21 (35.6)
Laterality (n=57)
Right	25 (43.9)
Left	31 (54.4)
Both	1 (1.7)
Marital status
Never married	2 (3.4)
Married	33 (55.9)
NA	24 (40.7)
Alcohol
Current alcohol user	16 (27.1)
No alcohol	18 (30.5)
NA	25 (42.4)
Tobacco
Current smoker	10 (16.9)
Ex-smoker	10 (16.9)
Never smoker	29 (49.2)
NA	10 (16.9)
Chief complaint at the time of diagnosis
Palpable mass	43 (72.9)
Nipple discharge	3 (5.1)
Nipple tenderness	1 (1.7)
Back pain	1 (1.7)
Dyspnea	1 (1.7)
NA	10 (16.9)
Duration of symptoms, median (range, mo)	5 (1-36)
Less than 1 mo	13 (22.0)
1-6 mo	13 (22.0)
6 mo-1 yr	8 (13.6)
1-2 yr	2 (3.4)
2-3 yr	4 (6.8)
Over 3 yr	3 (5.1)
NA	16 (27.1)
Family history of cancer
No family history	33 (55.9)
Family history of cancer	6 (10.2)
NA	20 (33.9)
Clinical stage
I	17 (28.8)
II	26 (44.1)
III	6 (10.2)
IV	5 (8.5)
NA	5 (8.5)
Clinical T stage
T1	28 (47.5)
T2	20 (33.9)
T3	4 (6.8)
NA	7 (11.9)
Clinical N stage
N0	27 (45.8)
N1	19 (32.2)
N2	2 (3.4)
N3	4 (6.8)
NA	7 (11.9)

NA, not available.

Table 2.

Histopathologic characteristics

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=59)
Histology
Infiltrating ductal carcinoma	44 (74.5)
Papillary carcinoma	4 (6.8)
Ductal carcinoma in situ	4 (6.8)
Mucinous carcinoma	2 (3.4)
Cribriform carcinoma	2 (3.4)
Sarcoma	1 (1.7)
Carcinoma, NOS	2 (3.4)
Grade
Well	5 (8.5)
Moderately	22 (37.3)
Poorly	21 (35.6)
NA	11 (18.7)
TNM stage
I	17 (28.8)
II	26 (44.1)
III	6 (10.2)
IV	5 (8.5)
NA	5 (8.5)
Pathologic T stage (n=50)
T1	27 (54.0)
T2	18 (36.0)
T3	4 (8.0)
NA	1 (2.0)
Pathologic N stage (n=50)
N0	25 (50.0)
N1	19 (38.0)
N2	2 (4.0)
N3	3 (6.0)
NA	1 (2.0)
Lymphatic invasion (n=33)
Positive	18 (54.5)
Negative	15 (45.5)
Estrogen receptor (n=42)
Negative	4 (9.5)
Positive	38 (90.5)
Progesterone receptor (n=42)
Negative	15 (35.7)
Positive	27 (64.3)
HER-2 overexpression (n=40)
Negative	29 (72.5)
Positive	11 (27.5)

NOS, not otherwise specified; NA, not available; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Table 3.

Treatment and survival status

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=59)
Surgery (n=50)
Sentinel lymph node biopsy	5 (10.0)
Modified radical mastectomy	43 (86.0)
Total mastectomy	5 (10.0)
Lumpectomy	2 (4.0)
Adjuvant treatment (n=41)
Chemotherapy	8 (19.5)
Hormone therapy	21 (51.2)
Radiotherapy	1 (2.4)
Both chemotherapy and hormone therapy	11 (26.8)
Status at last follow-up
No evidence of disease	43 (72.9)
Alive with disease	5 (8.5)
Dead of disease	8 (13.6)
Dead of other causes	3 (5.1)

Table 4.

Cox regression analysis of the factors associated with overall survival in male breast cancer (n=59)

Characteristic	Crude HR	95% CI	p-value
Stage (I vs. II, III, IV)	6.11	1.151-32.428	0.034^*
Age (< 65 yr vs. ≥ 65 yr)	0.64	0.216-1.951	0.442
Smoking state (never vs. ever)	1.66	0.522-5.308	0.389
LN involvement (absent vs. present)	1.33	0.633-1.338	0.633
Lymphatic invasion (absent vs. present)	4.42	0.514-37.966	0.176
ER status (positive vs. negative)	27.04	0.001-959,175.267	0.537
HER2 status (negative vs. positive)	0.39	0.741-2.152	0.280
Axillary lymph node dissection (done vs. not done)	1.34	0.405-4.418	0.633
Adjuvant treatment (done vs. not done)	1.81	0.555-5.878	0.327

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; LN, lymph node; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

^* p < 0.05.

REFERENCES

1. Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, Berg CD, Chlebowski RT, Feuer EJ, et al. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1670–4. Article PubMed
2. Stang A, Thomssen C. Decline in breast cancer incidence in the United States: what about male breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112:595–6. Article PubMed
3. Speirs V, Shaaban AM. The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:429–30. Article PubMed
4. Ministry of Health and Welfare; Korea Central Cancer Registry; National Cancer Center. Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2012. Goyang: National Cancer Center; 2012.
5. Baek JM, Sung GY, Lee DS, Kim W, Park IY, Jung SS, et al. Male breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2005;8:123–7. Article
6. Cho J, Han W, Ko E, Lee JW, Jung SY, Kim EK, et al. The clinical and histopathological characteristics of male breast cancer patient. J Breast Cancer. 2007;10:211–6. Article
7. Lee PC, Son BH, Kwon JN, Lee WB, Lee KM. Clinical features of the male breast cancer-13 cases. J Korean Breast Cancer Soc. 2004;7:193–8. Article
8. Gomez-Raposo C, Zambrana Tevar F, Sereno Moyano M, Lopez Gomez M, Casado E. Male breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:451–7. Article PubMed
9. Fentiman IS, Fourquet A, Hortobagyi GN. Male breast cancer. Lancet. 2006;367:595–604. Article PubMed
10. Miao H, Verkooijen HM, Chia KS, Bouchardy C, Pukkala E, Laronningen S, et al. Incidence and outcome of male breast cancer: an international population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4381–6. Article PubMed
11. Scott-Conner CE, Jochimsen PR, Menck HR, Winchester DJ. An analysis of male and female breast cancer treatment and survival among demographically identical pairs of patients. Surgery. 1999;126:775–80. Article PubMed
12. Ioka A, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A. Survival of male breast cancer patients: a population-based study in Osaka, Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36:699–703. Article PubMed
13. Nahleh ZA, Srikantiah R, Safa M, Jazieh AR, Muhleman A, Komrokji R. Male breast cancer in the veterans affairs population: a comparative analysis. Cancer. 2007;109:1471–7. Article PubMed
14. Hill A, Yagmur Y, Tran KN, Bolton JS, Robson M, Borgen PI. Localized male breast carcinoma and family history: an analysis of 142 patients. Cancer. 1999;86:821–5. Article PubMed
15. Ottini L, Silvestri V, Rizzolo P, Falchetti M, Zanna I, Saieva C, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative male breast cancer patients: results from a collaborative multicenter study in Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:411–8. Article PubMed
16. Onami S, Ozaki M, Mortimer JE, Pal SK. Male breast cancer: an update in diagnosis, treatment and molecular profiling. Maturitas. 2010;65:308–14. Article PubMed PMC
17. Ottini L, Rizzolo P, Zanna I, Falchetti M, Masala G, Ceccarelli K, et al. BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and clinical-pathologic features of 108 male breast cancer cases from Tuscany: a population-based study in central Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:577–86. Article PubMed
18. Park HL, Kwak JY, Lee SD, Nam SJ, Yang JH. Male breast cancer-10 cases. J Korean Breast Cancer Soc. 2003;6:303–7. Article
19. Jaiyesimi IA, Buzdar AU, Sahin AA, Ross MA. Carcinoma of the male breast. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:771–7. Article PubMed
20. Giordano SH, Valero V, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Efficacy of anastrozole in male breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:235–7. Article PubMed
21. Mauras N, O'Brien KO, Klein KO, Hayes V. Estrogen suppression in males: metabolic effects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2370–7. Article PubMed
22. Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Koutoulidis V, Sparber C, Steger GG, Dubsky P, et al. Aromatase inhibitors with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in metastatic male breast cancer: a case series. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2259–63. Article PubMed PMC
23. Di Lauro L, Pizzuti L, Barba M, Sergi D, Sperduti I, Mottolese M, et al. Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in metastatic male breast cancer: results from a pooled analysis. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8:53.Article PubMed PMC
24. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Breast Cancer [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2015 [cited 2016 Dec 30]. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls?PDF?brastt.pdf

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine treatment with tamoxifen for male breast cancer
Yaping Huang, Chengjie Ke, Jiaqin Cai, Xiaoxia Wei, Maohua Chen, Hong Sun
Breast Cancer.2024; 31(5): 917. CrossRef
Cáncer de mama en el varón: estudio multicéntrico en Aragón durante 27 años
Olga Dobato Portoles, Daniel Aparicio Lopez, Reyes Ibañez Carreras, Elena Aguirre Ortega, Beatriz Eizaguirre Zarza, Carmen García Mur, Aurora Carrasquer Puyal, María Pilar Cebollero Benito, Laura Isabel Comín Novella, Marta Allue Cabañuz, Fernando Martine
Cirugía Española.2024; 102(10): 524. CrossRef
Observational Study of Men and Women with Breast Cancer in Terms of Overall Survival
Vlad Bogdan Varzaru, Diana-Maria Anastasiu-Popov, Anca-Elena Eftenoiu, Roxana Popescu, Daliborca Cristina Vlad, Cristian Sebastian Vlad, Aurica Elisabeta Moatar, Daniela Puscasiu, Ionut Marcel Cobec
Cancers.2024; 16(17): 3049. CrossRef
Male breast cancer: A multicenter study in Aragon over 27 years
Olga Dobato Portoles, Daniel Aparicio Lopez, Reyes Ibañez Carreras, Elena Aguirre Ortega, Beatriz Eizaguirre Zarza, Carmen García Mur, Aurora Carrasquer Puyal, María Pilar Cebollero Benito, Laura Isabel Comín Novella, Marta Allue Cabañuz, Fernando Martine
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2024; 102(10): 524. CrossRef
Male breast cancer: a 32-year retrospective analysis in radiation therapy referral center in northern Iran
Mahboobeh Asgharian, Dariush Moslemi, Hossein-Ali Nikbakht, Mohammad-Ali Jahani, Ali Bijani, Hakimeh Mehdizadeh
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(10): 5756. CrossRef
Impacts of Subtype on Clinical Feature and Outcome of Male Breast Cancer: Multicenter Study in Korea (KCSG BR16-09)
Jieun Lee, Keun Seok Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Heejung Chae, Joohyuk Sohn, Gun Min Kim, Kyung-Hee Lee, Su Hwan Kang, Kyung Hae Jung, Jae-ho Jeong, Jae Ho Byun, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Seungtaek Lim, Hee Jun Kim, Hye Sung Won, Hyung Soon Park, Guk Jin Lee, S
Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(1): 123. CrossRef
Clinicopathological features and correlation analysis of male breast cancer
Lei Xi, Jinxing Zhou, Yan Wu, Rong Rong
Medicine.2023; 102(30): e34408. CrossRef
Characteristics of metastasis and survival between male and female breast cancer with different molecular subtypes: A population‐based observational study
Wentong Fang, Yue Huang, Xu Han, Jinghui Peng, Mingjie Zheng
Cancer Medicine.2022; 11(3): 764. CrossRef
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between men and women with breast cancer: a retrospective study using nationwide inpatient data in Japan
Takaaki Konishi, Michimasa Fujiogi, Nobuaki Michihata, Kojiro Morita, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Masahiko Tanabe, Yasuyuki Seto, Hideo Yasunaga
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 186(3): 731. CrossRef
Ulcerated Nipple Nodule, Clinicopathologic Challenge: Answer
Ahmad Adel, Mona R. E. Abdel-Halim, Yosra Abdel-Galeil
The American Journal of Dermatopathology.2021; 43(6): 466. CrossRef
Genetic Landscape of Male Breast Cancer
Fernando Augusto Batista Campos, Etienne Rouleau, Giovana Tardin Torrezan, Dirce Maria Carraro, José Claudio Casali da Rocha, Higor Kassouf Mantovani, Leonardo Roberto da Silva, Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osório, Solange Moraes Sanches, Sandrine M.
Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3535. CrossRef
Treatment of male breast cancer: meta-analysis of real-world evidence
A. P. Lin, T.-W. Huang, K.-W. Tam
British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(9): 1034. CrossRef
Polycaprolactone nanofibers as an adjuvant strategy for Tamoxifen release and their cytotoxicity on breast cancer cells
Ana D. Pinzón-García, Ruben Sinisterra, Maria Cortes, Fredy Mesa, Sandra Ramírez-Clavijo
PeerJ.2021; 9: e12124. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors in Male Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Study in South Korea by the Study of SMARTSHIP Group
Sungmin Park, Ho Hur, Ji Sung Lee, JaeSun Yoon, Sung Mo Hur, Il Yong Chung, Jong Won Lee, Hyun Jo Youn, Se Jeong Oh, Cheol Wan Lim, Jihyoun Lee
Journal of Breast Cancer.2021; 24(6): 561. CrossRef
Meme Kanseri Cerrahisi Sonrası Lenfödem ve Uçak Seyahati
Aysel GÜL, Dilek AYGİN
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2021; (15): 669. CrossRef
Italian Men Tested for BRCA1/2 Mutation: Psychological Distress during 6-Month Follow-Up
F. Pellini, S. Mirandola, E. Granuzzo, S. Urbani, G. Piccinni Leopardi, G. P. Pollini
Journal of Oncology.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Comparing the Characteristics and Outcomes of Male and Female Breast Cancer Patients in Korea: Korea Central Cancer Registry
Eun-Gyeong Lee, So-Youn Jung, Myong Cheol Lim, Jiwon Lim, Han-Sung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Jai Hong Han, Heein Jo, Young-Joo Won, Eun Sook Lee
Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 739. CrossRef
The effect of chemotherapy on survival in patients with nonmetastatic male breast cancer: A population‐based observational study
Hong Pan, Kai Zhang, Ming Wang, Lijun Ling, Shui Wang, Wenbin Zhou
Cancer.2020; 126(S16): 3830. CrossRef
Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Male Breast Cancer—A Rare Indication?
Tobias Forster, Clara Köhler, Rami El Shafie, Fabian Weykamp, Laila König, Nathalie Arians, Sebastian Adeberg, Laura Michel, Katharina Smetanay, Michael Golatta, Christof Sohn, Jörg Heil, Andreas Schneeweiss, Jürgen Debus, Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Cancers.2020; 12(12): 3645. CrossRef
Male Breast Cancer: Surgical and Genetic Features and a Multidisciplinary Management Strategy
Francesca Pellini, Eleonora Granuzzo, Silvia Urbani, Sara Mirandola, Marina Caldana, Davide Lombardi, Elena Fiorio, Marta Mandarà, Giovanni Paolo Pollini
Breast Care.2020; 15(1): 14. CrossRef
Ultrasonographic and Mammographic Findings of Male Breast Disease
Su Hong Kim, Young‐Seon Kim
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2019; 38(1): 243. CrossRef
Pattern of care of adjuvant radiotherapy in male breast cancer patients in clinical practice: an observational study
Paul Rogowski, Stephan Schönecker, Montserrat Pazos, Daniel Reitz, Michael Braun, Martin Pölcher, Claus Hanusch, Rachel Wuerstlein, Nadia Harbeck, Sven Mahner, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.2019; 195(4): 289. CrossRef
Survival analysis for male ductal and lobular breast cancer patients with different stages
Jizhao Wang, Yuchen Sun, Jingkun Qu, Huang Zuo, Xixi Zhao, Lin Liu, Jinteng Feng, Jiansheng Wang, Guangjian Zhang
Future Oncology.2019; 15(2): 167. CrossRef
Clinical features of patients with male breast cancer in Shanxi province of China from 2007 to 2016
Weigang Wang, Xiaoqin Xu, Baoguo Tian, Yan Wang, Lili Du, Ting Sun, Yanchun Shi, Xianwen Zhao, Yali Jia, Yanfeng Xi, Jiexian Jing
Journal of Investigative Medicine.2019; 67(3): 699. CrossRef
Metastasis pattern and prognosis of male breast cancer patients in US: a population-based study from SEER database
Jun Xie, Yao-Yu Ying, Bin Xu, Yan Li, Xian Zhang, Chong Li
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Different Patterns of Conditional Survival of Breast Cancer Patients by Age and Histologic Types: Evidence from the Korean Nationwide Registry
So-Youn Jung, Kyu-Won Jung, Johyun Ha, Young-Joo Won, Young Ae Kim, Youngmee Kwon, Sun-Young Kong, Eun Sook Lee
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2019; 28(7): 1169. CrossRef
Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Male Breast Lesions
Raza S. Hoda, Ronald N. Arpin III, Ravi V. Gottumukkala, Kevin S. Hughes, Amy Ly, Elena F. Brachtel
Acta Cytologica.2019; 63(4): 319. CrossRef
The endocrinology of male breast cancer
Ian S Fentiman
Endocrine-Related Cancer.2018; 25(6): R365. CrossRef
Magee Equation Recurrence Score Is Associated With Distal Metastatic Risk in Male Breast Carcinomas
Yanjun Hou, Harrison S Moosavi, Lai Wei, Anil V Parwani, Xiaoxian (Bill) Li, Zaibo Li
American Journal of Clinical Pathology.2018; 150(6): 491. CrossRef
Axillary lymph node metastasis as the first manifestation of male occult breast cancer
Xinyu Wang, Liwen Fan, Wenxing Yan, Qi Zhang, Shunchao Bao, Ying Wang, Xin Bao, Linlin Liu
Medicine.2018; 97(50): e13706. CrossRef
A review of estrogen receptor/androgen receptor genomics in male breast cancer
Tesa M Severson, Wilbert Zwart
Endocrine-Related Cancer.2017; 24(3): R27. CrossRef
Imaging the Male Breast
Shruthi Ram, Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri
Current Radiology Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Mammary gland tumors in a male Cocker Spaniel
Soon-Chan Kwon, Dae-Young Yoo, Minho Ko, Kwon-Young Lee, Ho-Hyun Kwak, In-Chul Park, In-Koo Hwang, Jung-Hoon Choi, Jin-Young Chung
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Male occult breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis as the first manifestation
Ruixin Xu, Jianbin Li, Yingjie Zhang, Hongbiao Jing, Youzhe Zhu
Medicine.2017; 96(51): e9312. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Clinical Features of Male Breast Cancer: Experiences from Seven Institutions Over 20 Years

Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1389-1398. Published online April 11, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.410

XML Download

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
NOTES
REFERENCES

Clinical Features of Male Breast Cancer: Experiences from Seven Institutions Over 20 Years

Fig. 1. Patients diagram. FBC, female breast cancer; MBC, male breast cancer; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; LN, lymph node.

Fig. 2. (A) Overall survival (OS) of total male patients with breast cancer. (B) OS of male patients with localized breast cancer. (C) Disease-free survival (DFS) of male patients with localized breast cancer.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Clinical Features of Male Breast Cancer: Experiences from Seven Institutions Over 20 Years

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=59)
Age at diagnosis, median (range, yr)	66 (24-87)
Diagnosis period
1995-1999	8 (13.6)
2000-2004	13 (22.0)
2005-2010	17 (28.8)
2010-2014	21 (35.6)
Laterality (n=57)
Right	25 (43.9)
Left	31 (54.4)
Both	1 (1.7)
Marital status
Never married	2 (3.4)
Married	33 (55.9)
NA	24 (40.7)
Alcohol
Current alcohol user	16 (27.1)
No alcohol	18 (30.5)
NA	25 (42.4)
Tobacco
Current smoker	10 (16.9)
Ex-smoker	10 (16.9)
Never smoker	29 (49.2)
NA	10 (16.9)
Chief complaint at the time of diagnosis
Palpable mass	43 (72.9)
Nipple discharge	3 (5.1)
Nipple tenderness	1 (1.7)
Back pain	1 (1.7)
Dyspnea	1 (1.7)
NA	10 (16.9)
Duration of symptoms, median (range, mo)	5 (1-36)
Less than 1 mo	13 (22.0)
1-6 mo	13 (22.0)
6 mo-1 yr	8 (13.6)
1-2 yr	2 (3.4)
2-3 yr	4 (6.8)
Over 3 yr	3 (5.1)
NA	16 (27.1)
Family history of cancer
No family history	33 (55.9)
Family history of cancer	6 (10.2)
NA	20 (33.9)
Clinical stage
I	17 (28.8)
II	26 (44.1)
III	6 (10.2)
IV	5 (8.5)
NA	5 (8.5)
Clinical T stage
T1	28 (47.5)
T2	20 (33.9)
T3	4 (6.8)
NA	7 (11.9)
Clinical N stage
N0	27 (45.8)
N1	19 (32.2)
N2	2 (3.4)
N3	4 (6.8)
NA	7 (11.9)

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=59)
Histology
Infiltrating ductal carcinoma	44 (74.5)
Papillary carcinoma	4 (6.8)
Ductal carcinoma in situ	4 (6.8)
Mucinous carcinoma	2 (3.4)
Cribriform carcinoma	2 (3.4)
Sarcoma	1 (1.7)
Carcinoma, NOS	2 (3.4)
Grade
Well	5 (8.5)
Moderately	22 (37.3)
Poorly	21 (35.6)
NA	11 (18.7)
TNM stage
I	17 (28.8)
II	26 (44.1)
III	6 (10.2)
IV	5 (8.5)
NA	5 (8.5)
Pathologic T stage (n=50)
T1	27 (54.0)
T2	18 (36.0)
T3	4 (8.0)
NA	1 (2.0)
Pathologic N stage (n=50)
N0	25 (50.0)
N1	19 (38.0)
N2	2 (4.0)
N3	3 (6.0)
NA	1 (2.0)
Lymphatic invasion (n=33)
Positive	18 (54.5)
Negative	15 (45.5)
Estrogen receptor (n=42)
Negative	4 (9.5)
Positive	38 (90.5)
Progesterone receptor (n=42)
Negative	15 (35.7)
Positive	27 (64.3)
HER-2 overexpression (n=40)
Negative	29 (72.5)
Positive	11 (27.5)

Characteristic	No. (%) (n=59)
Surgery (n=50)
Sentinel lymph node biopsy	5 (10.0)
Modified radical mastectomy	43 (86.0)
Total mastectomy	5 (10.0)
Lumpectomy	2 (4.0)
Adjuvant treatment (n=41)
Chemotherapy	8 (19.5)
Hormone therapy	21 (51.2)
Radiotherapy	1 (2.4)
Both chemotherapy and hormone therapy	11 (26.8)
Status at last follow-up
No evidence of disease	43 (72.9)
Alive with disease	5 (8.5)
Dead of disease	8 (13.6)
Dead of other causes	3 (5.1)

Characteristic	Crude HR	95% CI	p-value
Stage (I vs. II, III, IV)	6.11	1.151-32.428	0.034^*
Age (< 65 yr vs. ≥ 65 yr)	0.64	0.216-1.951	0.442
Smoking state (never vs. ever)	1.66	0.522-5.308	0.389
LN involvement (absent vs. present)	1.33	0.633-1.338	0.633
Lymphatic invasion (absent vs. present)	4.42	0.514-37.966	0.176
ER status (positive vs. negative)	27.04	0.001-959,175.267	0.537
HER2 status (negative vs. positive)	0.39	0.741-2.152	0.280
Axillary lymph node dissection (done vs. not done)	1.34	0.405-4.418	0.633
Adjuvant treatment (done vs. not done)	1.81	0.555-5.878	0.327

Table 1. Patient characteristics

NA, not available.

Table 2. Histopathologic characteristics

NOS, not otherwise specified; NA, not available; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Table 3. Treatment and survival status

Table 4. Cox regression analysis of the factors associated with overall survival in male breast cancer (n=59)

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; LN, lymph node; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.