Altered Expression of Smad Proteins in T or NK-cell Lymphomas

Jai Hyang Go

doi:10.4143/crt.2008.40.4.197

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 40(4); 2008 > Article

Original Article Altered Expression of Smad Proteins in T or NK-cell Lymphomas: Jai Hyang Go, M.D.; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2008;40(4):197-201.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2008.40.4.197
Published online: December 31, 2008

Department of Pathology, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Correspondence: Jai Hyang Go, Department of Pathology, Dankook University College of Medicine, 16-5, Anseo-dong, Cheonan 330-715, Korea. (Tel) 82-41-550-3896, (Fax) 82-41-561-9127, jaihyang@yahoo.co.kr

• Received: September 15, 2008 • Accepted: October 19, 2008

8,015 Views
42 Download
2 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
Smad proteins mediate cellular signaling through the transforming growth factor-β family (TGF-βs). Smads 2 and 3 transmit signals from TGF-β, and Smad4 is a common mediator, as well. However, little is known concerning the expression patterns of Smads in lymphoid tissue.
Materials and Methods
Immunohistochemistry for Smad3 and Smad4 was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue sections collected from 26 T- or NK-cell lymphomas.
Results
Nearly all cells in germinal centers were positive for Smad3, and more than 50% of paracortical cells were positive for Smad3 in reactive lymphoid tissue. When Smad4 immunostaining was conducted, nearly all the cells in the germinal centers showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining, and most of them exhibited nuclear positivity, as well. In addition, more than 50% of the cells in the paracortex were positive for Smad4. Furthermore, the Smad3 staining pattern was preserved in all malignant lymphomas, but four of these cases (15%) exhibited decreased expression of Smad4. All lymphoblastic lymphomas showed strong positivity in most of tumor cells, but one unspecified peripheral lymphoma, two nasal NK/T cell lymphomas, and one anaplastic large cell lymphoma were negative for Smad4.
Conclusions
These results suggest that TGF-β-specific Smads may be actively involved in signal transduction in lymphoid organs and that Smad-mediated TGF-β signaling pathways are operative in malignant lymphoma. In addition, loss of Smad4 expression might be associated with development of some T-cell lymphomas.
Key words: Smad proteins, T lymphocytes, Lymphoma, Etiology

INTRODUCTION

The transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) family is a multifunctional group of cytokines that includes three mammalian TGF-βs, activins, inhibins, and a number of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), all of which can regulate processes such as cell growth, terminal differentiation, apoptosis, immune responses, and expression of extracellular matrix through transcriptional regulation of a diverse number of gene targets (1-3).

The TGF-β superfamily members signal through a family of transmembrane receptors that have intrinsic cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinase activity. The binding of a ligand to a type II receptor (TGF-βRII) results in the recruitment and transphophorylation of type I receptors (TGF-βRI), which then signal downstream responses and induce carboxy-terminal serine phosphorylation of a set of cytoplasmic signal-transducing proteins collectively referred to as Smad proteins (1-4). Receptor-activated Smads then interact transiently with specific, ligand-activated TGF-βRI and are phosphorylated. Pathway-specific Smads include Smads 1, 5, and 8, which mediate BMP signaling, and Smads 2 and 3, which mediate TGF-β and activin signaling. A phosphorylated pathway-specific Smad heterodimerizes with Smad4, and this complex then translocates to the nucleus to transactivate specific target genes. Smad4 is functionally unique among the Smads and is not regulated by phosphorylation, but instead acts as a common mediator of all of the pathway-specific Smads and as a common mediator of TGF-β, activin, and BMP signaling responses. Inhibitory Smads disrupt signal transduction by preventing phosphorylation of pathway-specific Smads. Smad6 appears to inhibit BMP signaling, while Smad7 is more involved in the inhibition of TGF-β-dependent signaling. In contrast to the pathway-specific Smads, the inhibitory Smads are primarily localized to the nucleus in the absence of a ligand. However, they accumulate in the cytoplasm upon receptor activation (1-4).

TGF-β is a potent growth inhibitor of most cells (5). Cellular insensitivity to growth inhibition by TGF-β is a hallmark in the genesis and progression of human cancer, which can be directly linked to inactivating mutations or the loss of expression of various signaling molecules whose activities are regulated by TGF-β. TGF-β and its intracellular signaling proteins are widely established tumor suppressors (6), and mutation or loss of the gene responsible for TGF-β receptor expression has been noted in cases of cutaneous and noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma, B-cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma (5,7,8). Therefore, loss of TGF-β receptors nullifies the immunosuppressive properties of TGF-β in lymphocytes and enhances cell proliferation, indicating that this may be an important step in the development of malignant lymphoma.

The Smads for TGF-β also appear to function as tumor suppressors. For instance, mutations that inactivate Smad2 have been identified in human colorectal and lung cancers, whereas mutations that lead to the inactivation or loss of Smad4 expression have been found in human pancreatic, breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, and head and neck cancers (9). Moreover, the Smad3 gene functions as a tumor suppressor in mice. Therefore, targeted disruption of Smad3 leads to the formation of colorectal adenocarcinomas that are capable of penetrating the intestinal wall and metastasizing to distant locations. This finding suggests that the gene encoding Smad3 is a tumor suppressor, similar to the genes that encode for Smad2 and Smad4 (10). In spite of the information available regarding Smad proteins, little is known about their expression pattern during lymphomagenesis. Therefore, in this study, the localizations of Smad3 and Smad4 in T-cell lymphoma tissues were compared in order to elucidate their roles in lymphomagenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of surgically resected tissues, diagnosed as T-cell lymphomas based on the new WHO classification, were retrieved from the surgical files. Immunohistochemical detection was used for B-cell (CD20), T-cell (CD3), and NK-cell (CD56) markers in paraffin-embedded sections in order to confirm the T- or NK-cell nature of these tumors. Twenty-six cases of T-cell lymphoma broke down as follows: 4 cases of acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, 8 cases of peripheral T-cell lymphoma-unspecified, 10 cases of nasal or nasal type NK/T-cell lymphoma, 2 cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 1 case of angioimmunoblastic lymphoma, and 1 case of adult T-cell lymphoma. All cases were included in this study.

1) Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded materials using a primary antibody for Smad3 (diluted 1:50) (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA (51~1,500)) or Smad4 (diluted 1:50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, (B-8)). Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated, washed in distilled water, immersed in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6), and then microwaved for 10 minutes. Next, the sections were treated with a 3% H₂O₂ solution to reduce endogenous peroxidase activity, and then washed in phosphate buffer saline. The samples were then incubated with primary antibodies. Detection of immunoreactive staining was achieved by the streptavidin biotin method using an LSAB kit (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). Sections were subjected to a color reaction with diaminobenzidine, and then counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. Tumors were considered to be positive only when a distinct nuclear staining comparable to that of normal lymphoid cells (tonsil and thymus) could be demonstrated.

2) Statistical analysis

The differences in Smad4 positivity in precursor and peripheral T-cell lymphomas were assessed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Normal squamous epithelium is positive for Smad3 and Smad4; therefore, it was used as the positive control. More than 50% of the thymocytes in the thymus showed strong nuclear staining for Smad3 (Fig. 1A), and nearly all of the cells in the germinal centers and more than 50% of the paracortical cells in the tonsils were positive for Smad3, with moderate staining intensity (Fig. 1B). When Smad4 immunostaining was conducted, nearly all of the thymocytes showed strong to moderate nuclear staining in the thymus (Fig. 1C), and nearly all of the cells in the germinal centers showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining, with most of them exhibiting nuclear positivity, as well. In addition, more than 50% of the cells in the paracortex of the tonsil were positive for Smad4, with moderate staining intensity (Fig. 1D).

When the malignant lymphomas were evaluated, all of the cases were strongly positive for Smad3 (Fig. 2). However, 22 cases were also moderately to strongly positive for Smad4 (Fig. 3), and 4 cases (15%) were negative for Smad4 (Table 1). When Smad3 was evaluated, all of the precursor lymphomas were positive, and nearly all of the tumor cells within the lymphomas were positive with a staining intensity (strong) similar to that seen in the non-neoplastic thymocytes. Furthermore, analysis of all of the peripheral T-cell lymphomas revealed that most of the tumor cells were positive and had a stronger staining intensity than the paracortical mature T-cells did. When Smad4 was evaluated, all acute lymphoblastic lymphomas showed nuclear positivity. In contrast, one unspecified peripheral lymphoma, two nasal NK/T cell lymphomas, and one anaplastic large cell lymphoma were negative for Smad4, although these differences were clinically insignificant (p=0.489). Staining intensities similar to those observed in non-neoplastic thymocytes were observed in nearly all tumor cells in precursor T-cell lymphomas, and positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas exhibited more intense staining than that observed in non-neoplastic lymphoid tissue.

DISCUSSION

TGF-β and BMP are widely expressed during embryonic development, especially in tissues in which the inductive factors produced at the mesenchymal-epithelial interfaces influence cell differentiation and organogenesis (2). The early discovery of the anti-proliferative effects of TGF-β on T-cells in vitro suggested that TGF-β plays a crucial role in T-cell regulation (11), and it has been shown that TGF-β1 plays a major role in T-cell differentiation and function. In addition, TGF-β1 mediates inhibition of the proliferation of freshly isolated human thymocytes in response to IL-2, IL-4, and IL-7 (12). Thymocytes and thymic epithelial cells express TGF-β, which limits the developmental progression of thymocytes (13), and TGF-β type I receptor and nuclear translocated phosphorylated-Smad2, a hallmark of active TGF-β/activin signaling, have been detected in the thymus (13). These findings are similar to those seen in the present study, in which more than 50% of the thymocytes showed strong nuclear staining for Smad3, and nearly all of the thymocytes showed strong to moderate nuclear staining for Smad4.

In normal lymph nodes, TGF-β is produced by follicular dendritic cells within the microenvironment of the secondary lymphatic follicles (14). However, in the reactive lymphoid tissues, less than 5% of the small lymphocytes have been shown to be positive for TGF-β (15), and most of the small lymphocytes, granulocytes, and germinal centers are non-reactive (16,17). In a previous experiment, a mouse model was used to demonstrate that all of the tissues that were examined expressed at least one of the BMP-specific Smads (1 or 5) and one of the TGF-β/activin-specific Smads (2 or 3). However, the amount of nuclear staining for these Smad proteins varied depending upon the tissue and cell type (2). In lymphoid tissue, the stromal cells and T cells of the developing thymus showed widespread expression of the common mediator, Smad4, and moderate expression of the TGF-β-specific Smads, 2 and 3, with Smad3 being found primarily in the nucleus. In the spleen, Smads 2 and 4 are the most highly expressed Smads (2). However, little information has been gathered regarding the expression patterns of Smad proteins in human lymphoid tissue. In this study, nearly all of the cells in the germinal centers and more than 50% of the paracortical cells were positive for Smad3. In addition, most of the cells in the germinal centers and the paracortical regions showed nuclear positivity for Smad4. TGF-β plays an important role in regulating the balance between proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic cells (18,19), and it is also an important regulator of immune cell development and function (20). The generalized expression patterns of Smad3 and Smad4 found in lymphoid tissues, including thymus and tonsil, suggest that TGF-β-specific Smads may be actively involved in signal transduction in the TGF-β signaling pathway, and that they function to maintain the homeostasis of lymphoid cells in human lymphoid organs.

In a study conducted on non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, only a few small lymphocytes were positive for TGF-β, and no TGF-β was detected in tumor cells obtained from follicular lymphomas or peripheral T-cell lymphomas (15). Conversely, the same study found that 30% of the Reed-Sternberg cells were positive for TGF-β, and a large number of medium-sized T-lymphocytes were also positive for TGF-β in the Hodgkin's lymphoma samples (15). In addition, another study found that all of the low- and high-grade gastric B-cell lymphomas were negative or weakly positive for TGF-β1 (13). Another study involving diffuse large B-cell lymphomas found that the tumors were all positive for Smad3, but that some of these cases (19%) were negative for Smad4 (21).

To date, there has been little data generated regarding the expression patterns of Smads in T-cell lymphoma. In our study, all T- or NK-cell lymphomas were strongly positive for Smad3. In contrast, one group reported decreased expression of Smad3 by Western blotting in T-cell leukemia (22), suggesting that the level of Smad3 protein expressed by T-cells might be an important determinant in the suppression of T-cell tumorigenesis. Generally, the level of Smad3 protein in T-cells is known to be directly correlated with the gene dosage: levels in Smad +/- mice are approximately half those seen in Smad3 +/+ mice, and the loss of Smad3 alone is insufficient to initiate T-cell tumorigenesis. In their study, 10% of Smad3 +/-, p27 -/- mice developed T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Smad3 was expressed from the retained allele, as evidenced by immunohistochemistry detection in solid tumors and Western blotting detection in lysates of purified lymphoblasts (22). Therefore, our cases showing Smad3 protein expression might be Smad3 +/- associated with alterations in other factors that control the activation, proliferation, and viability of T-cells such as p27.

However, some of T or NK-cell lymphomas in our study (4/26) were negative for Smad4. All acute lymphoblastic lymphomas were positive, in contrast to four peripheral T-cell lymphomas showing Smad4 negativity. Genetic changes, including DNA mutations of the Smad genes, have been rarely reported in hematopoietic tumors (18). Therefore, loss of Smad4 expression might be related to an epigenetic mechanism or might be induced by alterations at the post-DNA level.

Our findings suggest that the TGF-β signaling pathway, mediated through the Smad proteins, generally operates in this type of lymphoma because the nuclear localization of Smad proteins pinpoints the area in which signaling is particularly active (2).

High expression of inhibitory Smads may ameliorate or attenuate strong signaling by receptor-activated Smads, and the expression of other factors, such as BAMBI/Eyb/nma, Ski, SnoN, and SARA, may modulate this signaling. Moreover, it has been shown that signaling by members of the TGF-β superfamily is not exclusively Smad-dependent (2). TGF-β-induced growth stimulation occurs in a Smad-independent manner and is accompanied with increased Erk phosphorylation and elevated cyclin D1 expression (23). However, further studies to evaluate these factors in normal lymphoid tissues and lymphoma tissues are needed to evaluate the reason for Smad3 and Smad4 expression in the development of lymphoid organs and in T-cell lymphomagenesis.

Disturbance of the lymphocyte TGF-β signaling pathway enhances cell proliferation and may contribute to the development of malignant lymphoma. In this study, a small portion of the lymphomas exhibited loss of Smad4 expression. Smads can function as tumor suppressors to ameliorate TGF-β signaling in lymphoid tissues. Further studies using larger samples will be required to correlate the loss of Smad4 expression with other clinicopathologic parameters, as well as to determine its clinical significance in the setting of T-cell lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

Smad3 and Smad4 proteins were expressed in most of T or NK-cell lymphomas, suggesting that TGF-β-specific Smads may be actively involved in signal transduction in malignant lymphoma. In addition, loss of Smad4 expression might be associated with development of some T-cell lymphomas.

NOTES

The research was conducted by the research fund of Dankook University in 2008.

REFERENCES

1. de Caestecker MP, Yahata T, Wang D, Parks WT, Huang S, Hill CS, et al. The Smad4 activation domain (SAD) is a proline-rich, p300-dependent transcriptional activation domain. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:2115–2122. PMID: 10636916Article PubMed
2. Flanders KC, Kim ES, Roberts AB. Immunohistochemical expression of Smads 1-6 in the 15-day gestation mouse embryo: signaling by BMPs and TGF-betas. Dev Dyn. 2001;220:141–154. PMID: 11169847Article PubMed
3. Larisch-Bloch S, Danielpour D, Roche NS, Lotan R, Hsing AY, Kerner H, et al. Selective loss of the transforming growth factor-beta apoptotic signaling pathway in mutant NRP-154 rat prostatic epithelial cells. Cell Growth Differ. 2000;11:1–10. PMID: 10672898PubMed
4. Patil S, Wildey GM, Brown TL, Choy L, Derynck R, Howe PH. Smad7 is induced by CD40 and protects WEHI 231 B-lymphocytes from transforming growth factor-beta-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38363–38370. PMID: 10995749Article PubMed
5. Miyazono K. TGF-beta receptors and signal transduction. Int J Hematol. 1997;65:97–104. PMID: 9071813Article PubMed
6. Schiemann WP, Pfeifer WM, Levi E, Kadin ME, Lodish HF. A deletion in the gene for transforming growth factor beta type I receptor abolishes growth regulation by transforming growth factor beta in a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 1999;94:2854–2861. PMID: 10515889Article PubMed
7. Kadin ME, Cavaille-Coll MW, Gertz R, Massague J, Cheifetz S, George D. Loss of receptors for transforming growth factor beta in human T-cell malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:6002–6006. PMID: 8016105Article PubMed PMC
8. Knaus PI, Lindemann D, DeCoteau JF, Perlman R, Yankelev H, Hille M, et al. A dominant inhibitory mutant of the type II transforming growth factor beta receptor in the malignant progression of a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:3480–3489. PMID: 8668164Article PubMed PMC
9. Takaku K, Oshima M, Miyoshi H, Matsui M, Seldin MF, Taketo MM. Intestinal tumorigenesis in compound mutant mice of both Dpc4 (Smad4) and Apc genes. Cell. 1998;92:645–656. PMID: 9506519Article PubMed
10. Zhu Y, Richardson JA, Parada LF, Graff JM. Smad3 mutant mice develop metastatic colorectal cancer. Cell. 1998;94:703–714. PMID: 9753318Article PubMed
11. Gorelik L, Flavell RA. Transforming growth factor-beta in T-cell biology. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:46–53. PMID: 11905837Article PubMed
12. Rubtsov YP, Rudensky AY. TGFbeta signalling in control of T-cell-mediated self-reactivity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:443–453. PMID: 17525753Article PubMed
13. Rosendahl A, Speletas M, Leandersson K, Ivars F, Sideras P. Transforming growth factor-beta- and Activin-Smad signaling pathways are activated at distinct maturation stages of the thymopoiesis. Int Immunol. 2003;15:1401–1414. PMID: 14645149Article PubMed
14. Djaborkhel R, Tvrdik D, Eckschlager T, Raska I, Muller J. Cyclin A down-regulation in TGFbeta1-arrested follicular lymphoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 2000;261:250–259. PMID: 11082295Article PubMed
15. Hsu SM, Lin J, Xie SS, Hsu PL, Rich S. Abundant expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 and -beta 2 by Hodgkin's Reed-Sternberg cells and by reactive T lymphocytes in Hodgkin's disease. Hum Pathol. 1993;24:249–255. PMID: 7681031Article PubMed
16. Go JH. Decreased expression of TGF-β type 2 receptor in primary B-cell lymphomas of the stomach. Pathol Res Pract. 2002;198:333–337. PMID: 12092769Article PubMed
17. Kadin ME, Agnarsson BA, Ellingsworth LR, Newcom SR. Immunohistochemical evidence of a role for transforming growth factor beta in the pathogenesis of nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's disease. Am J Pathol. 1990;136:1209–1214. PMID: 2356855PubMed PMC
18. Kim SJ, Letterio J. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Leukemia. 2003;17:1731–1737. PMID: 12970772Article PubMed
19. Hu X, Zuckerman KS. Transforming growth factor: signal transduction pathways, cell cycle mediation, and effects on hematopoiesis. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2001;10:67–74. PMID: 11276360Article PubMed
20. Yang X, Letterio JJ, Lechleider RJ, Chen L, Hayman R, Gu H, et al. Targeted disruption of SMAD3 results in impaired mucosal immunity and diminished T cell responsiveness. EMBO J. 1999;18:1280–1291. PMID: 10064594Article PubMed PMC
21. Go JH. Expression Pattern of smad proteins in diffuse large b-cell lymphomas. Korean J Pathol. 2004;38:301–305.
22. Wolfraim LA, Fernandez TM, Mamura M, Fuller WL, Kumar R, Cole DE, et al. Loss of Smad3 in acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:552–559. PMID: 15295048Article PubMed
23. Chi SG. Transcriptional Regulation of Oncogenes by TGF-β1. Cancer Res Treat. 2003;35(Suppl 1):12.

Fig. 1

When Smad3 immunostaining was conducted, more than 50% of the thymocytes showed strong nuclear staining (A), and more than 50% of the paracortical cells were positive with moderate staining intensity (B). When Smad4 immunostaining was conducted, nearly all of the thymocytes showed strong to moderate nuclear staining (C), and more than 50% of the cells in the paracortex were positive, with moderate staining intensity (D).

Fig. 2

When the T-cell lymphomas were evaluated, all of the cases were strongly positive for Smad3.

Fig. 3

Twenty-one T-cell lymphomas were moderately to strongly positive for Smad4, and four cases (15%) were negative for Smad4.

Table 1

Expression of Smad3 and Smad4 in T-cell lymphomas

^*acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, ^†peripheral T-cell lymphoma-unspecified, ^‡anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ^§angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ^∥adult T-cell lymphoma.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Appreciating the broad clinical features of SMAD4 mutation carriers: a multicenter chart review
Karen E. Wain, Marissa S. Ellingson, Jamie McDonald, Amanda Gammon, Maegan Roberts, Pavel Pichurin, Ingrid Winship, Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Noralane M. Lindor
Genetics in Medicine.2014; 16(8): 588. CrossRef
Genomic profiling combined with gene expression profiling in primary central nervous system lymphoma
Chang Ohk Sung, Sang Cheol Kim, Sivasundaram Karnan, Kennosuke Karube, Hyung Jin Shin, Do-Hyun Nam, Yeon-Lim Suh, Seok-Hyung Kim, Ji Yeon Kim, Seok Jin Kim, Won Seog Kim, Masao Seto, Young-Hyeh Ko
Blood.2011; 117(4): 1291. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Altered Expression of Smad Proteins in T or NK-cell Lymphomas

Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40(4):197-201. Published online December 31, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2008.40.4.197

XML Download

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
NOTES
REFERENCES

Altered Expression of Smad Proteins in T or NK-cell Lymphomas

Fig. 1 When Smad3 immunostaining was conducted, more than 50% of the thymocytes showed strong nuclear staining (A), and more than 50% of the paracortical cells were positive with moderate staining intensity (B). When Smad4 immunostaining was conducted, nearly all of the thymocytes showed strong to moderate nuclear staining (C), and more than 50% of the cells in the paracortex were positive, with moderate staining intensity (D).

Fig. 2 When the T-cell lymphomas were evaluated, all of the cases were strongly positive for Smad3.

Fig. 3 Twenty-one T-cell lymphomas were moderately to strongly positive for Smad4, and four cases (15%) were negative for Smad4.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Altered Expression of Smad Proteins in T or NK-cell Lymphomas

Table 1

Expression of Smad3 and Smad4 in T-cell lymphomas

^*acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, ^†peripheral T-cell lymphoma-unspecified, ^‡anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ^§angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ^∥adult T-cell lymphoma.

Table 1 Expression of Smad3 and Smad4 in T-cell lymphomas

^*acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, ^†peripheral T-cell lymphoma-unspecified, ^‡anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ^§angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ^∥adult T-cell lymphoma.