The Usefulness of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Early Diagnostic Markers of Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

Dae Yong Kim; Yoon-Seon Lee; Shin Ahn; Yeon Hee Chun; Kyung Soo Lim

doi:10.4143/crt.2011.43.3.176

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Cancer Res Treat > Volume 43(3); 2011 > Article

Original Article The Usefulness of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Early Diagnostic Markers of Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia: Dae Yong Kim, MD, Yoon-Seon Lee, MD, PhD, Shin Ahn, MD, Yeon Hee Chun, MD, Kyung Soo Lim, MD; Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association 2011;43(3):176-180.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2011.43.3.176
Published online: September 30, 2011

Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Yoon-Seon Lee, MD, PhD. Department of Emergency Medicine, Cancer Emergency, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap 2-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
Tel: 82-2-3010-5905, Fax: 82-2-3010-3360, ysdoc@amc.seoul.kr

• Received: February 11, 2011 • Accepted: June 2, 2011

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

13,398 Views
155 Download
38 Crossref
46 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

Purpose
Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are well known inflammatory markers. This study was designed to determine whether PCT and CRP are useful as early diagnostic markers for bacteremia in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) in the emergency department (ED).
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study, 286 episodes of FN in the ED were consecutively included between June 2009 and August 2010. From medical records, clinical characteristics including PCT and CRP were extracted and analyzed.
Results
Bacteremia was identified in 38 (13.3%) of the 286 episodes. The median values of PCT (2.8 ng/mL vs. 0.0 ng/mL, p=0.000) and CRP (15.9 mg/dL vs. 5.6 mg/dL, p=0.002) were significantly higher in the group with bacteremia compared to the group without bacteremia. In univariate analysis, elevated PCT (>0.5 ng/mL) and CRP (>10 mg/dL) as well as older age, hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea, and high body temperature were significantly associated with bacteremia. On multivariate analysis, elevated PCT (>0.5 ng/mL) (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 9.2; p<0.01) and tachypnea (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 8.5; p<0.01) were independent early diagnostic markers for bacteremia in FN patients. The area under the curve of PCT was 74.8% (95% CI, 65.1 to 84.6%) and that of CRP was 65.5% (95% CI, 54.8 to 76.1%). With a PCT cut-off value of 0.5 ng/mL, sensitivity and specificity were 60.5% and 82.3%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity were 57.6% and 67.3%, respectively, with a CRP cutoff of 10 mg/dL.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that PCT is a useful early diagnostic marker for the detection of bacteremia in FN at the ED and has better diagnostic value than CRP.
Key words: Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, Neutropenia, Biomarkers, Bacteremia

Introduction

Febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients is a common complication related to antineoplastic therapy, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It is a high risk factor for developing serious bacterial infections that can result in fatal outcomes. Mortality has been reported to be higher in FN patients with bacteremia than in those without bacteremia [1]. Recently, more cancer patients receive chemotherapy in outpatient settings, so the number of patients that visit the emergency department (ED) with complications related to antineoplastic therapy is increasing [2]. Therefore an immediate and appropriate strategy for this population in ED is required to reduce treatment delays and improve outcomes.

The early diagnosis of bacterial infection among patients with FN is challenging. Focus of infection is uncertain, and only a few clinical signs such as fever, headache, and hypotension may indicate bacterial infections in many cases of FN [3]. Efforts to predict bacteremia have been made, but their sensitivity and specificity have been poor [4]. Even though blood cultures are the gold standard for the diagnosis of bacteremia [5], obtaining and testing these is time-consuming and their results are not available immediately in the ED. Therefore, a predictive tool to diagnose bacterial infections in FN is crucial for early diagnosis in the ED.

Several inflammatory markers have been studied for the diagnosis of infection. Among them, C-reactive protein (CRP) is frequently used and is a good marker of infection but it rarely distinguishes between bacterial and viral infection [6]. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a prohormone of calcitonin secreted from C-cells of the thyroid gland, and has been proposed as a candidate marker for diagnosis of active bacterial infections [7]. Serum PCT concentration in healthy individuals is low, but raises during septic conditions, especially when related to bacterial infections [8].

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of PCT and CRP as early diagnostic markers of bacteremia in cancer patients with chemotherapy-related FN in the ED.

Materials and Methods

Subjects enrolled in this study were adult cancer patients (16 years or older) with chemotherapy-associated FN who visited the ED of a university-affiliated tertiary referral medical center, between June 2009 and August 2010. Clinical data were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical records.

Fever was defined as a single oral temperature of ≥38.3℃ or a temperature of ≥38.0℃ for ≥1 hour, and neutropenia was defined as a neutrophil count of <500 cells/mm³, or a count of <1,000 cells/mm³ with a predicted decrease to <500 cells/mm³ [9].

Laboratory data were obtained with complete blood count, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase (ALT) as well as PCT and CRP, at the time of admission to ED.

All statistical data were analyzed with SPSS ver. 12.0.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The Chi-square test and Student's t-test were used for univariate analysis. The Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous data was used to screen for admission parameters potentially associated with final outcomes. Median values with interquartile range were calculated for inflammatory markers including PCT and CRP. For univariate analysis, age was categorized by the median value and clinical measurements were classified as hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP]<90 mm Hg), tachycardia (pulse rate>120 beats/min), tachypnea (respiratory rate>24 breathes/min), and high body temperature (>39℃). PCT were grouped by three cut-off values of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 ng/mL, and similarly CRP by cutoff values of 5, 10, and 20 mg/dL. All the categorical variables were compared using Chi-square analysis. Parameters considered significantly associated with a high risk of bacteremia were selected in univariate analysis, and the logistic regression for multivariate analysis was calculated for odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Diagnostic values for bacteremia of PCT and CRP were calculated by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. p-values<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

1. Baseline characteristics of the overall population

A total of 286 patients were included as the study population, including 239 (83.6%) from solid tumors and 47 (16.4%) from hematologic malignancies. Among solid tumors, breast cancer was the most common in 94 followed by gastrointestinal cancer in 68 and lung cancer in 37 patients. Hematologic malignancies consisted of 37 lymphoma, 4 myelodysplastic syndromes, and 3 leukemia patients. The median age of patients was 54 years and females were dominant in the population (male : female=1 : 1.25).

As shown in Table 1, bacteremia was detected in 38 episodes (13.3%). In comparison between groups with and without bacteremia, the bacteremia group showed significantly higher rates of pulse (115 beats/min vs. 108 beats/min, p=0.01) and respiration (22 breaths/min vs. 20 breaths/min, p< 0.01) than the non-bacteremia group whereas SBP (114 mm Hg vs. 117 mm Hg) and body temperature (38.5℃ vs. 38.4℃) were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05, each). The bacteremia group had poorer laboratory findings than the non-bacteremia group, although there was no significant difference in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and ALT. In the same way, PCT and CRP showed much higher levels in the bacteremia group compared to the non-bacteremia group (the median value of PCT, 2.75 ng/mL vs. 0.00 ng/mL, p<0.01; the median value of CRP, 15.9 mg/dL vs. 5.6 mg/dL, p<0.01).

2. Comparison of early clinical features between FN groups with and without bacteremia

The majority of patients in the bacteremia group were older than those in the non-bacteremia group (68% vs. 44%, p<0.01). Two groups showed difference in gender distribution but this finding was not significant. Hypotension (24% vs. 4%), tachycardia (42% vs. 19%), tachypnea (37% vs. 9%), and high body temperature (42% vs. 21%) were reported more commonly and significantly in the bacteremia group than in the non-bacteremia group (p<0.01 for all). As shown in Table 2, in all comparisons of various cut-off values of PCT, the bacteremia group had higher PCT levels than the non-bacteremia group with statistical significance. On the other hand, in a category of CRP with the cut-off value of 5 mg/dL, there was no significant difference between bacteremia and non-bacteremia groups (68% vs. 52%, p=0.08), even though significant differences were observed in other categories of CRP with the cut-off value of 10 mg/dL (58% vs. 33%, p<0.01) and 20 mg/dL (37% vs. 12%, p<0.01) (Table 2). On multivariate analysis, PCT with a cutoff value of 0.5 ng/mL (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.2; p<0.01) and tachypnea (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 8.5; p<0.01) were independent early diagnostic markers for bacteremia in FN patients at ED (Table 3).

3. Diagnostic accuracy of PCT and CRP for bacteremia in FN

The ROC curves of PCT and CRP are shown in Fig. 1. The area under the curve (AUC) of PCT was 74.8% (95% CI, 65.1 to 84.6%) while the AUC of CRP was 65.5% (95% CI, 54.8 to 76.1%), representing higher diagnostic accuracy of PCT to predict bacteremia than the accuracy of CRP (p<0.05). With a PCT cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL, sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 60.5% and 82.3%, respectively. CRP with a cutoff of 10 mg/dL showed sensitivity and specificity of CRP as 57.6% and 67.3%, respectively. Table 4 shows sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios for PCT and CRP.

Discussion

FN with infection is a medical emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and intervention as soon as possible. Localizing signs and symptoms of infection are minimal or often absent and the progression of infection can be rapid in FN patients [9]. Therefore, an early diagnostic test to predict bacteremia in FN would be of great value by providing physicians with more definite evidence of the etiology of fever; especially in the ED where the first point of care has to be done.

On account of difficulties in diagnosis of bacterial infection in the FN, attempts to improve accuracy and rapidity of diagnosis of infection have been made through efforts on biomarkers [10]. Among various biomarkers, PCT and CRP have been considered useful [11]. In previous reports on PCT and CRP, PCT was shown to be more strongly associated with documented bacterial infection in FN patients [12]. PCT increased earlier in bacterial infection and returned to the normal range more quickly than CRP. In healthy individuals, PCT concentrations were below the detection limit but levels increased with increasing severity of the inflammatory response to bacterial infection [13]. In comparison with PCT, there was a wider overlap of CRP levels between groups with and without bacteremia. On multivariate analysis, PCT was an independent, useful marker whereas CRP was not significant in predicting bacteremia. Similarly, the ROC curve showed superior sensitivity and specificity of PCT over CRP. A cut-off value of serum PCT to discriminate bacteremia from non-bacterial infection was adopted in this study as proposed previously [14,15]. PCT≥0.5 ng/mL showed statistical significance in predicting bacteremia in FN patients. On the basis of the reported PCT values in FN, PCT values<0.5 ng/mL were less likely to occur in patients with bacteremia. For a cut-off value of CRP, 10 mg/dL was used as proposed in the previous study [16].

In this study, the incidence of bacteremia was 13.3% and variables including age, initial vital signs, laboratory data except ANC and ALT, PCT and CRP, were significantly different between groups with and without bacteremia. However, to discover factors related with unrevealed bacteremia in early phase and to evaluate the usefulness of inflammatory markers, vital signs recorded initially at the ED and inflammatory markers, including PCT and CRP, at the time of admission were analyzed. As the result, tachypnea as well as PCT was significant as an early diagnostic marker for bacteremia. In the study by Bossink et al. [17], among the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrme (SIRS) criteria, tachypnea was the only factor that significantly predicted shock development in febrile patients using multivariate analysis. Considering that rapid respiratory rate and elevated PCT were independently and strongly associated with bacteremia, physicians should pay more attention to FN patients who present these characteristics.

Origins of inflammatory PCT are controversial since the production of PCT in the infection phase is not related to thyroid tissues [18]. The exact site of production during sepsis has not been identified, but it has been demonstrated that immunoreactive cells including neutrophils were possible sources of PCT production [19]. Therefore, concerns have been raised about possible impairment of PCT production in patients with neutropenia. However, other studies have demonstrated higher PCT levels in FN patients with documented bacterial infections [20], and our study also supported the plausibility of PCT as a reliable marker for bacterial infection in FN.

This study has several limitations. Some recent studies suggested that PCT kinetics were more valuable to assess prognosis in infectious diseases [21]. In this study, however, the levels of PCT were evaluated only once at the time of admission at the ED. Another limitation is the heterogeneity of the cancer population. Cancer patients have great variation in the degree of immunosuppression and long-term survival. The majority of patients enrolled in this study were with solid tumors. Patients with hematologic malignancies are more likely to be immunocompromised than patients with solid organ malignancy and are at high risk of sepsis and have worse prognosis compared to solid tumors [22].

Limitation of PCT is that PCT only reflects systemic manifestation of bacterial infection. PCT may not or may only slightly increase when infection remains in a localized tissue with no systemic manifestations [23]. In patients with localized infections without signs of systemic manifestation, therapeutic measures such as antibiotics or surgical intervention may be necessary despite of normal PCT levels. Although elevated PCT values during severe infections may decrease to very low levels with appropriate therapy, this does not always indicate complete eradication of the infection but merely that generalization of the infection or the septic response is under control. Continuation of antibiotic therapy or surgical measures may be necessary until all clinical signs of infection have disappeared [13].

Conclusion

Bacteremia were detected in 13.3% of enrolled episodes of FN. Serum PCT concentration were significantly higher in patients with bacteremia. In a multivariate analysis, tachypnea and elevated PCT were independently and significantly associated with bacteremia.

These findings suggest that PCT is a useful early diagnostic marker to detect bacteremia in cancer patients with FN and has better diagnostic value than CRP. It is recommended to establish an early treatment strategy to prevent complications of bacterial infection in FN patients with high serum PCT concentration in the ED.

NOTES

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

REFERENCES

1. Adelberg DE, Bishop MR. Emergencies related to cancer chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2009;27:311–331. PMID: 19447314Article PubMed
2. Courtney DM, Aldeen AZ, Gorman SM, Handler JA, Trifilio SM, Parada JP, et al. Cancer-associated neutropenic fever: clinical outcome and economic costs of emergency department care. Oncologist. 2007;12:1019–1026. PMID: 17766662Article PubMed
3. Rasool Hassan BA, Yusoff ZB, Othman SB. Fever/clinical signs and association with neutropenia in solid cancer patients: bacterial infection as the main cause. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:1273–1277. PMID: 21198276PubMed
4. Bossink AW, Groeneveld J, Hack CE, Thijs LG. Prediction of mortality in febrile medical patients: How useful are systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis criteria? Chest. 1998;113:1533–1541. PMID: 9631790Article PubMed
5. Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, Parmigiani G, et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:584–602. PMID: 9145732Article PubMed
6. Gendrel D, Raymond J, Coste J, Moulin F, Lorrot M, Guérin S, et al. Comparison of procalcitonin with C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 and interferon-alpha for differentiation of bacterial vs. viral infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:875–881. PMID: 10530583Article PubMed
7. Maruna P, Nedelníková K, Gürlich R. Physiology and genetics of procalcitonin. Physiol Res. 2000;49(Suppl 1):S57–S61. PMID: 10984072PubMed
8. Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, Raymond J, Guilbaud J, Bohuon C. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet. 1993;341:515–518. PMID: 8094770Article PubMed PMC
9. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, et al. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:730–751. PMID: 11850858Article PubMed
10. Marshall JC, Reinhart K. International Sepsis Forum. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2290–2298. PMID: 19487943Article PubMed
11. Massaro KS, Costa SF, Leone C, Chamone DA. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as severe systemic infection markers in febrile neutropenic adults. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:137PMID: 18034890Article PubMed PMC
12. Schuttrumpf S, Binder L, Hagemann T, Berkovic D, Trumper L, Binder C. Utility of procalcitonin concentration in the evaluation of patients with malignant diseases and elevated C-reactive protein plasma concentrations. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:468–473. PMID: 16838236Article PubMed
13. Karzai W, Oberhoffer M, Meier-Hellmann A, Reinhart K. Procalcitonin: a new indicator of the systemic response to severe infections. Infection. 1997;25:329–334. PMID: 9427049Article PubMed PMC
14. Giamarellou H, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Repoussis P, Galani L, Anagnostopoulos N, Grecka P, et al. Potential use of procalcitonin as a diagnostic criterion in febrile neutropenia: experience from a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:628–633. PMID: 15214875Article PubMed
15. Jimeno A, García-Velasco A, del Val O, González-Billalabeitia E, Hernando S, Hernández R, et al. Assessment of procalcitonin as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in patients with solid tumors and febrile neutropenia. Cancer. 2004;100:2462–2469. PMID: 15160353Article PubMed
16. Hambach L, Eder M, Dammann E, Schrauder A, Sykora KW, Dieterich C, et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin serum levels in comparison with C-reactive protein in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2002;87:643–651. PMID: 12031922PubMed
17. Bossink AW, Groeneveld AB, Koffeman GI, Becker A. Prediction of shock in febrile medical patients with a clinical infection. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:25–31. PMID: 11176153Article PubMed
18. Russwurm S, Wiederhold M, Oberhoffer M, Stonans I, Zipfel PF, Reinhart K. Molecular aspects and natural source of procalcitonin. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:789–797. PMID: 10536927Article PubMed
19. Hitoglou-Hatzi S, Hatzistilianou M, Gougoustamou D, Rekliti A, Agguridaki CH, Athanassiadou F, et al. Serum adenosine deaminase and procalcitonin concentrations in neutropenic febrile children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Clin Exp Med. 2005;5:60–65. PMID: 16096855Article PubMed
20. Ruokonen E, Nousiainen T, Pulkki K, Takala J. Procalcitonin concentrations in patients with neutropenic fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:283–285. PMID: 10385017Article PubMed
21. Boussekey N, Leroy O, Alfandari S, Devos P, Georges H, Guery B. Procalcitonin kinetics in the prognosis of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:469–472. PMID: 16477418Article PubMed
22. Williams MD, Braun LA, Cooper LM, Johnston J, Weiss RV, Qualy RL, et al. Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mortality, and associated costs of care. Crit Care. 2004;8:R291–R298. PMID: 15469571Article PubMed PMC
23. Eberhard OK, Haubitz M, Brunkhorst FM, Kliem V, Koch KM, Brunkhorst R. Usefulness of procalcitonin for differentiation between activity of systemic autoimmune disease (systemic lupus erythematosus/systemic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis) and invasive bacterial infection. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1250–1256. PMID: 9214425Article PubMed

Fig. 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The areas under the ROC curves of PCT and CRP were 74.8% and 65.5%, respectively. CI, confidence interval.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics in the overall study population

Characteristics	All	Bacteremia (+)	Bacteremia (-)	p-value
No. of patients (%)	286	38 (13.3)	248 (86.7)
Age (range, yr)	54 (42-64)	62 (24-91)	53 (16-82)	＜0.01
Male gender	127 (44.4)	22 (57.9)	105 (42.3)	0.07
Underlying malignancy				0.24
Solid tumor	239 (84)	29/239 (12)	210/239 (88)
Hematologic malignancy	47 (16)	9/47 (19)	38/47 (81)
Vital signs
SBP (mm Hg)	116 (104-128)	114 (91-126)	117 (105-128)	0.09
Pulse rate (beats/min)	108 (98-118)	115 (103-135)	108 (98-118)	0.01
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)	20 (20-22)	22 (20-24)	20 (20-20)	＜0.01
Body temperature (℃)	38.4 (36.3-38.9)	38.5 (38.1-39.2)	38.4 (38.1-38.8)	0.18
Laboratory findings
ANC (/mm³)	130 (40-370)	90 (20-363)	140 (41-383)	0.20
Hemoglobin (g/dL)	10.6 (9.3-11.6)	9.8 (8.6-10.6)	10.7 (9.4-11.7)	＜0.01
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	126.5 (81.5-188.0)	68.0 (28.0-126.3)	136.5 (92.0-197.3)	＜0.01
AST (IU/L)	26 (20-37)	39 (24-54)	25 (20-35)	＜0.01
ALT (IU/L)	23 (16-36)	28 (16-53)	23 (16-53)	0.08
BUN (mg/dL)	11 (7-16)	18 (14-31)	10 (7-15)	＜0.01
Creatinine (mg/dL)	0.7 (0.6-0.9)	0.6 (0.7-1.3)	0.7 (0.6-0.8)	＜0.01
CRP (mg/dL)	5.8 (2.6-14.0)	15.9 (3.6-26.0)	5.6 (2.5-12.7)	＜0.01
PCT (ng/mL)	0.05 (0.00-0.36)	2.8 (0.04-20.8)	0.0 (0.00-0.18)	＜0.01

Values are presented as number (%) or median (IQR). By the Shapiro-Wilk test, all variables in categories of vital signs and laboratory findings were not normally distributed. The Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used to calculate variables in each category. SBP, systolic blood pressure; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; IQR, interquartile range.

Table 2

Comparison of early clinical features between febrile neutropenia groups with and without bacteremia

	Bacteremia (+) (n=38)	Bacteremia (-) (n=248)	p-value
Clinical history
Age＞median age of 54 yr	26 (68)	108 (44)	＜0.01
Male gender	22 (58)	105 (42)	0.08
Clinical measurements
SBP＜90 mm Hg	9 (24)	10 (4)	＜0.01
Pulse rate＞120 beats/min	16 (42)	46 (19)	＜0.01
Respiratory rate＞24 breaths/min	14 (37)	21 (9)	＜0.01
Body temperature＞39℃	16 (42)	53 (21)	＜0.01
Inflammatory markers
PCT (ng/mL)
＞0.1	27 (71)	84 (34)	＜0.01
＞0.5	23 (61)	44 (18)	＜0.01
＞1.0	22 (58)	28 (11)	＜0.01
CRP (mg/dL)
＞5	26 (68)	130 (52)	0.08
＞10	22 (58)	81 (33)	＜0.01
＞20	14 (37)	29 (12)	＜0.01

Values are presented as number (%). SBP, systolic blood pressure; PCT, procalcitonin; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 3

Multivariate analysis for bacteremia in febrile neutropenia patients

	Odds ratio (95% CI)	p-value
Age＞ median age of 54 yr	1.7 (0.8-3.9)	0.19
SBP＜90 mm Hg	2.4 (0.8-7.7)	0.14
Pulse rate＞120 beats/min	1.8 (0.8-4.0)	0.18
Respiratory rate＞24 breaths/min	3.4 (1.4-8.5)	＜0.01
Body temperature＞39℃	1.6 (0.7-3.5)	0.31
PCT > 0.5 ng/mL	3.6 (1.4-9.2)	＜0.01
CRP > 10 mg/dL	0.8 (0.34-2.1)	0.71

CI, confidence interval; SBP, systolic blood pressure; PCT, procalcitonin; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 4

Diagnostic accuracy of PCT and CRP for bacteremia in febrile neutropenia

Parameters	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	LR +	LR-
PCT (ng/mL)
＞0.1	71.1	66.1	2.1	0.4
＞0.5	60.5	82.3	3.4	0.5
＞1.0	57.9	88.7	3.8	0.7
CRP (mg/dL)
＞5	68.4	47.6	1.3	0.7
＞10	57.6	67.3	1.8	0.6
＞20	36.8	88.3	3.1	0.7

PCT, procalcitonin; CRP, C-reactive protein; LR, likelihood ratio.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical features, procalcitonin concentration, and bacterial infection in febrile hospitalized cancer patients: a descriptive study and association analysis
Pornpimon Patipatdontri, Rattagan Kajeekul, Jirawat Thanestada
Supportive Care in Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The utility of procalcitonin for diagnosing bacteremia and bacterial pneumonia in hospitalized oncology patients
Mary K. Munsell, Temidayo Fadelu, Sherri O. Stuver, Katherine P. Baker, Brett Glotzbecker, Justin L. Simmons, Kerry L. Reynolds, Ami K. Patel
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(8): 5193. CrossRef
Lycopene: A Natural Arsenal in the War against Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Diseases
May Nasser Bin-Jumah, Muhammad Shahid Nadeem, Sadaf Jamal Gilani, Bismillah Mubeen, Inam Ullah, Sami I. Alzarea, Mohammed M. Ghoneim, Sultan Alshehri, Fahad A. Al-Abbasi, Imran Kazmi
Antioxidants.2022; 11(2): 232. CrossRef
Current Status of Antibiotic Stewardship and the Role of Biomarkers in Antibiotic Stewardship Programs
Chung-Jong Kim
Infection & Chemotherapy.2022; 54(4): 674. CrossRef
Profile of febrile neutropenia in childhood cancer patients and the clinical utility of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in identifying severe infections
Latha Sneha, Sunitha Ramasamy, Vidya Krishna, Uma Sekar, Kopula Sathyamoorthy Sridharan, Shruti Krishna Iyengar, Julius Xavier Scott, Dhaarani Jayaraman
Sri Ramachandra Journal of Health Sciences.2022; 2: 61. CrossRef
Serum procalcitonin in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms
Ivan Krečak, Nena Peran, Ivana Lapić, Velka Gverić-Krečak, Filip Krečak, Pavle Rončević, Nadira Duraković
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.2021; 133(1-2): 62. CrossRef
Presepsin and Midregional Proadrenomedullin in Pediatric Oncologic Patients with Febrile Neutropenia
Luisa Agnello, Giulia Bivona, Elisa Parisi, Giuseppe Dejan Lucido, Alessandro Iacona, Anna Maria Ciaccio, Rosaria Vincenza Giglio, Ottavio Ziino, Marcello Ciaccio
Laboratory Medicine.2020; 51(6): 585. CrossRef
Comparison of CRP and procalcitonin for etiological diagnosis of fever during febrile neutropenia in hematology patients- an experience from a tertiary care center in Northern India
Rohan Halder, Tulika Seth, Pradeep K. Chaturvedi, Priyanka Mishra, Manoranjan Mahapatra, Hara P. Pati, Seema Tyagi, Renu Saxena
Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases.2020; 84: 102445. CrossRef
Procalcitonin as a Diagnostic Marker for Bacteremia in Terminal Cancer Patients
Jungeun Kim, Youn Seon Choi, Juneyoung Lee, In Cheol Hwang
Korean Journal of Clinical Geriatrics.2020; 21(1): 16. CrossRef
Utility of procalcitonin as a predictor of bloodstream infections and supportive modality requirements in critically ill cancer patients
Amanda G. Blouin, Meier Hsu, Martin Fleisher, Lakshmi V. Ramanathan, Stephen M. Pastores
Clinica Chimica Acta.2020; 510: 181. CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and C-Reactive Protein in Detection of Bacterial Infections and Prediction of Outcome in Nonneutropenic Febrile Patients with Lung Malignancy
Shanshan Ding, Jun Ma, Xingguo Song, Xiaohan Dong, Li Xie, Xianrang Song, Lisheng Liu
Journal of Oncology.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Prognostic value of procalcitonin and lipopolysaccharide binding protein in cancer patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia presenting to an emergency department
Ignacio Español-Morales, María Dolores Albaladejo-Otón, Ana Hernando-Holgado, Enrique Jiménez-Santos, Patricia Esteban-Torrella, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo
Biochemia medica.2019; 29(1): 57. CrossRef
Combination of sepsis biomarkers may indicate an invasive fungal infection in haematological patients
Igor Stoma, Igor Karpov, Anatoly Uss, Svetlana Krivenko, Igor Iskrov, Natalia Milanovich, Svetlana Vlasenkova, Irina Lendina, Kristina Belyavskaya, Veronika Cherniak
Biomarkers.2019; 24(4): 401. CrossRef
Serum procalcitonin as an independent diagnostic markers of bacteremia in febrile patients with hematologic malignancies
Mina Yang, Seung Jun Choi, Jaewoong Lee, Dong Gun Lee, Yoon-Joo Kim, Yeon-Joon Park, Eun-Jee Oh, Senthilnathan Palaniyandi
PLOS ONE.2019; 14(12): e0225765. CrossRef
Presepsin as a diagnostic marker of bacterial infections in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients with hematological malignancies
Ahmad Baraka, Marwa Zakaria
International Journal of Hematology.2018; 108(2): 184. CrossRef
Diagnostic value of sepsis biomarkers in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in a condition of high prevalence of gram-negative pathogens
Igor Stoma, Igor Karpov, Anatoly Uss, Oleg Rummo, Natalia Milanovich, Igor Iskrov
Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.2017; 10(1): 15. CrossRef
Comparison of diagnostic and prognostic utility of lactate and procalcitonin for sepsis in adult cancer patients presenting to emergency department with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Esra Keçe, Elif Yaka, Serkan Yılmaz, Nurettin Özgür Doğan, Cansu Alyeşil, Murat Pekdemir
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine.2016; 16(1): 1. CrossRef
The diagnostic value of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor compared with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in children with febrile neutropenia
Melis Sirinoglu, Ahmet Soysal, Ayşe Karaaslan, Eda Kepenekli Kadayifci, Ismail Cinel, Ahmet Koç, Gülnur Tokuç, Ali Yaman, Goncagül Haklar, Önder Şirikçi, Serap Turan, Gülşen Altınkanat Gelmez, Güner Söyletir, Mustafa Bakır
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology.2016; 33(3): 200. CrossRef
Initial procalcitonin level predicts infection and its outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma with febrile neutropenia
Xiao Liu, Dao Feng Wang, Yi Fang, Wen Feng Ye, Shu Liu, Ning Lou
Leukemia & Lymphoma.2015; 56(1): 85. CrossRef
Value of lipopolysaccharide binding protein as diagnostic marker of infection in adult cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: comparison with C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin 6
Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo, Ignacio Español-Morales, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Luciano Consuegra-Sánchez, Ana Hernando-Holgado, Patricia Esteban-Torrella, Enrique Jiménez-Santos, Monserrat Viqueira-González, África de Béjar-Almira, María Dolores Alba
Supportive Care in Cancer.2015; 23(7): 2175. CrossRef
Adrenomedullin—A New Marker in Febrile Neutropenia: Comparison With CRP and Procalcitonin
Metin Demirkaya, Deniz Tugcu, Arzu Akcay, Gönül Aydogan, Ferhan Akıcı, Zafer Salcioglu, Hakan Ekmekci, Betül Sevinir, Ozlem Balci Ekmekci
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology.2015; 32(7): 482. CrossRef
Utilización de procalcitonina y proteína C reactiva como marcadores de infección en la neutropenia febril de pacientes sometidos a trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos
Marina Sánchez-Yepes, Eduardo Aznar-Oroval, Pablo Lorente-Alegre, Tomás García-Lozano, Isabel Picón-Roig, Pilar Pérez-Ballestero, Blanca Ortiz-Muñoz
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica.2014; 32(7): 418. CrossRef
Predictive factors of bacteremia in patients with febrile urinary tract infection: an experience at a tertiary care center
H. Lee, Y.-S. Lee, R. Jeong, Y.-J. Kim, S. Ahn
Infection.2014; 42(4): 669. CrossRef
Differential diagnosis between bacterial infection and neoplastic fever in patients with advanced urological cancer: The role of procalcitonin
Hiroshi Yaegashi, Kouji Izumi, Yasuhide Kitagawa, Yoshifumi Kadono, Hiroyuki Konaka, Atsushi Mizokami, Mikio Namiki
International Journal of Urology.2014; 21(1): 104. CrossRef
Utilidad de la procalcitonina para predecir bacteriemia en pacientes oncológicos con fiebre
Enrique Jiménez-Santos, Ana Hernando-Holgado, Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo, Monserrat Viqueira-González, Pablo Cerezuela Fuentes, Ignacio Español Morales
Revista del Laboratorio Clínico.2014; 7(4): 127. CrossRef
The Utility of Proadrenomedullin and Procalcitonin in Comparison to C-Reactive Protein as Predictors of Sepsis and Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients With Cancer*
Labib Debiane, Ray Y. Hachem, Iba Al Wohoush, William Shomali, Ramez R. Bahu, Ying Jiang, Anne-Marie Chaftari, Joseph Jabbour, Munirah Al Shuaibi, Alexander Hanania, S. Egbert Pravinkumar, Philipp Schuetz, Issam Raad
Critical Care Medicine.2014; 42(12): 2500. CrossRef
Utility of C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin for Detecting Bloodstream Infection in Patients with HIV/AIDS
Arianna Castillo Marshall, Tersilia García Castellanos, Isabel Martínez Motas, Daniel Salazar Rodriguez, María Eugenia Toledo Romaní, Jorge Pérez Ávila
World Journal of AIDS.2014; 04(03): 287. CrossRef
The Use of Procalcitonin in Clinical Practice
Clementine YF Yap, Tar Choon Aw
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare.2014; 23(1): 33. CrossRef
Is Procalcitonin Reduction Indicative of Immunomodulation in Septic Patients Treated with Hemodialysis with High Cutoff Membrane?
Gianluca Villa, Paola Di Maggio, A. Raffaele De Gaudio
Blood Purification.2014; 38(2): 100. CrossRef
Utilidad de la procalcitonina en la detección de bacteriemia en los pacientes con cáncer
E. Aznar-Oroval, M. Sánchez-Yepes, T. García-Lozano, B. Ortiz-Muñoz, P. Pérez-Ballestero
Revista Clínica Española.2013; 213(5): 267. CrossRef
The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index score: 10 years of use for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients
Jean Klastersky, Marianne Paesmans
Supportive Care in Cancer.2013; 21(5): 1487. CrossRef
Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Significance of Pleural C-Reactive Protein in Lung Cancer Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions
Do-Sim Park, Dong Kim, Ki-Eun Hwang, Yu-Ri Hwang, Chul Park, Chang-Hwan Seol, Kyung-Hwa Cho, Byoung-Ryun Kim, Seong-Hoon Park, Eun-Taik Jeong, Hak-Ryul Kim
Yonsei Medical Journal.2013; 54(2): 396. CrossRef
Streamlining antibiotic therapy with procalcitonin protocols: consensus and controversies
Sebastian Haubitz, Beat Mueller, Philipp Schuetz
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine.2013; 7(2): 145. CrossRef
The significance of serum urokinase plasminogen activation receptor (suPAR) in the diagnosis and follow-up of febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies
Selçuk Kaya, Iftihar Köksal, Ahmet Menteşe, Mehmet Sönmez, Ayşegül Sümer, Seval Sönmez Yıldırım, Gürdal Yılmaz
International Journal of Infectious Diseases.2013; 17(11): e1056. CrossRef
Procalcitonin in sepsis and bacterial infections
Abhijit Chaudhury, G.L. Sachin Sumant, R. Jayaprada, Usha Kalawat, B.V. Ramana
Journal of Clinical & Scientific Research.2013; 2(4): 216. CrossRef
Procalcitonin as a marker of infection in febrile neutropenia: A systematic review
Anders K. Boysen, Bettina R. Jensen, Laurids Ø. Poulsen, Paw Jensen, Søren Ladefoged
Modern Chemotherapy.2013; 02(01): 8. CrossRef
Can procalcitonin distinguish infectious fever from tumor‐related fever in non‐neutropenic cancer patients?
William Shomali, Ray Hachem, Anne‐Marie Chaftari, Ying Jiang, Ramez Bahu, Joseph Jabbour, Sammy Raad, Munirah Al Shuaibi, Iba Al Wohoush, Issam Raad
Cancer.2012; 118(23): 5823. CrossRef
Allergic Airway Inflammation Initiates Long-Term Vascular Remodeling of the Pulmonary Circulation
Kristina Rydell-Törmänen, Lena Uller, Jonas S. Erjefält
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.2009; 149(3): 251. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The Usefulness of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Early Diagnostic Markers of Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

Cancer Res Treat. 2011;43(3):176-180. Published online September 30, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2011.43.3.176

XML Download

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
NOTES
REFERENCES

The Usefulness of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Early Diagnostic Markers of Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

Fig. 1 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). The areas under the ROC curves of PCT and CRP were 74.8% and 65.5%, respectively. CI, confidence interval.

Fig. 1

The Usefulness of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein as Early Diagnostic Markers of Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

Characteristics	All	Bacteremia (+)	Bacteremia (-)	p-value
No. of patients (%)	286	38 (13.3)	248 (86.7)
Age (range, yr)	54 (42-64)	62 (24-91)	53 (16-82)	＜0.01
Male gender	127 (44.4)	22 (57.9)	105 (42.3)	0.07
Underlying malignancy				0.24
Solid tumor	239 (84)	29/239 (12)	210/239 (88)
Hematologic malignancy	47 (16)	9/47 (19)	38/47 (81)
Vital signs
SBP (mm Hg)	116 (104-128)	114 (91-126)	117 (105-128)	0.09
Pulse rate (beats/min)	108 (98-118)	115 (103-135)	108 (98-118)	0.01
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)	20 (20-22)	22 (20-24)	20 (20-20)	＜0.01
Body temperature (℃)	38.4 (36.3-38.9)	38.5 (38.1-39.2)	38.4 (38.1-38.8)	0.18
Laboratory findings
ANC (/mm³)	130 (40-370)	90 (20-363)	140 (41-383)	0.20
Hemoglobin (g/dL)	10.6 (9.3-11.6)	9.8 (8.6-10.6)	10.7 (9.4-11.7)	＜0.01
Platelet (×10³/mm³)	126.5 (81.5-188.0)	68.0 (28.0-126.3)	136.5 (92.0-197.3)	＜0.01
AST (IU/L)	26 (20-37)	39 (24-54)	25 (20-35)	＜0.01
ALT (IU/L)	23 (16-36)	28 (16-53)	23 (16-53)	0.08
BUN (mg/dL)	11 (7-16)	18 (14-31)	10 (7-15)	＜0.01
Creatinine (mg/dL)	0.7 (0.6-0.9)	0.6 (0.7-1.3)	0.7 (0.6-0.8)	＜0.01
CRP (mg/dL)	5.8 (2.6-14.0)	15.9 (3.6-26.0)	5.6 (2.5-12.7)	＜0.01
PCT (ng/mL)	0.05 (0.00-0.36)	2.8 (0.04-20.8)	0.0 (0.00-0.18)	＜0.01

	Bacteremia (+) (n=38)	Bacteremia (-) (n=248)	p-value
Clinical history
Age＞median age of 54 yr	26 (68)	108 (44)	＜0.01
Male gender	22 (58)	105 (42)	0.08
Clinical measurements
SBP＜90 mm Hg	9 (24)	10 (4)	＜0.01
Pulse rate＞120 beats/min	16 (42)	46 (19)	＜0.01
Respiratory rate＞24 breaths/min	14 (37)	21 (9)	＜0.01
Body temperature＞39℃	16 (42)	53 (21)	＜0.01
Inflammatory markers
PCT (ng/mL)
＞0.1	27 (71)	84 (34)	＜0.01
＞0.5	23 (61)	44 (18)	＜0.01
＞1.0	22 (58)	28 (11)	＜0.01
CRP (mg/dL)
＞5	26 (68)	130 (52)	0.08
＞10	22 (58)	81 (33)	＜0.01
＞20	14 (37)	29 (12)	＜0.01

	Odds ratio (95% CI)	p-value
Age＞ median age of 54 yr	1.7 (0.8-3.9)	0.19
SBP＜90 mm Hg	2.4 (0.8-7.7)	0.14
Pulse rate＞120 beats/min	1.8 (0.8-4.0)	0.18
Respiratory rate＞24 breaths/min	3.4 (1.4-8.5)	＜0.01
Body temperature＞39℃	1.6 (0.7-3.5)	0.31
PCT > 0.5 ng/mL	3.6 (1.4-9.2)	＜0.01
CRP > 10 mg/dL	0.8 (0.34-2.1)	0.71

Parameters	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	LR +	LR-
PCT (ng/mL)
＞0.1	71.1	66.1	2.1	0.4
＞0.5	60.5	82.3	3.4	0.5
＞1.0	57.9	88.7	3.8	0.7
CRP (mg/dL)
＞5	68.4	47.6	1.3	0.7
＞10	57.6	67.3	1.8	0.6
＞20	36.8	88.3	3.1	0.7

Table 1 Baseline characteristics in the overall study population

Table 2 Comparison of early clinical features between febrile neutropenia groups with and without bacteremia

Values are presented as number (%). SBP, systolic blood pressure; PCT, procalcitonin; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 3 Multivariate analysis for bacteremia in febrile neutropenia patients

CI, confidence interval; SBP, systolic blood pressure; PCT, procalcitonin; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy of PCT and CRP for bacteremia in febrile neutropenia