This study aimed to evaluate the radiation-induced adverse effects on ocular structures in head and neck cancer patients and investigate the radiation dose-volume effects on the cornea, lacrimal gland, retina, optic nerve and chiasm.
A total of 38 eyes of 19 patients were included in this prospective, cohort study. All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination in addition to contrast sensitivity, visual field and visual evoked potentials (VEP) tests. Ophthalmological examinations and psychophysical tests were performed in 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th months and in the last visit. The relationship between the ophthalmologic findings, and the radiation doses below and above the cut-off values was evaluated.
Contrast sensitivity decrease and visual field deterioration were observed in 42% of the patients in the last visit (median 26 months) whereas a prolonged latency and decreased amplitude of P100 wave in VEP was observed in 58% and 33% of the eyes, respectively at 24th month. Totally 16 patients (84.2%) developed dry eye disease and eight of them received radiotherapy below tolerance doses and had mild to moderate dry eye findings. Radiation-induced retinopathy was observed in three of the eyes in eight patients who received radiation above tolerance dose.
Head and neck cancers treated with radiotherapy, resulted in various ophthalmic complications. All patients who are treating with radiotherapy should be evaluated by an ophthalmologist in terms of anterior and posterior segment damage, even if the radiation dose is below the tolerance limit.
Despite the serious damage to the orbit and surrounding tissues due to proximity, radiotherapy (RT) has an essential and critical role in the treatment of vascular, soft tissue, bone neoplasms in the paranasal sinus, nasal cavity, nasopharynx, and other head and neck neoplasms. The estimated radiation-induced damage to orbit has a quite wide spectrum. Ocular surface damage related with dry eye, cataract, optic neuropathy, retinopathy and even complete vision loss may develop.
Radiation retinopathy is defined as an occlusive vasculopathy secondary to the retinal vascular endothelial cell damage that results with ischemia. Radiation-induced optic neuropathy is caused by demyelination, free radical injury or DNA damage and presented with sudden, painless, irreversible visual loss after months to years following irradiation. Both are reported to have peak in 1–1.5 years, taking place between 3 months and 8 years. Radiation may cause direct damage to the corneal surface epithelium and associated erosion in the deep stromal layer, and endothelium. Keratitis sicca may also develop as a result of secondary tear loss. Thus, numerous small defects develop within days and months, leading to corneal opacification, ulceration, vascularization, and eventually loss of vision [
Ocular morbidity is closely related to the proximity of the RT to the orbital tissues, the affected part, and volume in the orbital tissues and RT dose. The effects and critical dose of RT on orbital tissues are well documented in literature [
In this study, the potential toxicity of RT; expected to develop due to the doses taken by the optical structures, has been prospectively evaluated. The relationship between dose-volume and ocular structures was studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the functions of the anterior visual pathways with psychophysical (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field), electrophysiologic (visual evoked potentials [VEP] latency, VEP amplitude) tests in head and neck cancer patients to evaluate the radiation dose-volume effects on the cornea, lacrimal gland, retina, optic nerve and chiasm.
This prospective, cohort study included 23 patients who were treated with RT either as adjuvant after operation or curatively due to nasopharynx, paranasal sinus, and nasal cavity tumors located close to the optic structures were diagnosed in 2015–2016. Three of the patients were excluded from the study because of local recurrence, receiving the second series of RT, and one patient developing distant metastasis. A total of 19 patients were able to complete the study. According to the 2017 American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging system, 42% of the patients were stage 3. All patients were treated with volumetric arc therapy. Total RT dose to the gross tumor volume, R1 resection, R0 resection were 70 Gy, 66 Gy and 60 Gy respectively with 2.12/2.06 Gy daily fractions. The patients received 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel followed by cisplatin concomitant with RT, at 3-week intervals or concomitant weekly cisplatin or none. The details are presented in
The patients were scanned in the supine position with a multidetector-row spiral computed tomography (CT) with a section thickness of 2 mm. On CT images, cornea, retina, lacrimal gland, retina, optic nerve, optic chiasm are defined according to the consensus guidelines of DahaNCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology, and TROG [
Dose limitations of ocular structures have been arranged according to the dose constraint guide of critical structures in five. However, since there is no definition for the lacrimal gland in this guideline, it is planned as the parotid gland. There is also no defined guideline for cornea yet, so the Dmean of the cornea was determined according to the previous studies in the literature [
Patients with history of prior RT to the same region, recurrent disease, tumor invasion to the optical structures, vision loss, advanced refractive error, glaucoma, or keratitis history prior to RT and non-compliant patients were excluded.
Visual acuity, anterior and posterior segment evaluation, followed by visual field, contrast sensitivity, and VEP tests were performed before the RT of the patients, and after the treatment at 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th months. The final ophthalmological examination was done at median 26 months (range, 24 to 91 months) of follow-up.
Visual acuity was measured with Snellen’s chart, based on the autorefractometer results after refractive correction. For diagnosis of dry eye disease, besides “Schirmer” and tear “Break-up Time” tests, staining of ocular surface with fluorescein was done during anterior segment examination. “Schirmer” test was performed to measure tear secretion and values above 10 mm were considered as normal. Tear film quality was assessed by tear “Break-up Time” and accepted as normal when it was higher than 10 seconds.
A full visual field (120°) test was performed with Zeiss Humphrey Field Analyser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Berlin, Germany). Visual field tests reveal the functional deterioration in visual pathways as scotomas and reflects the localization of the damage. Visual field defects were scored as grade 1: normal; grade 2: peripheral defects outside the central 30°-field; grade 3: defects located in the central 30°-field; grade 4: generalized defects.
Contrast sensitivity examinations were performed by MetroVision (Monopack 3, Perenchies, France), under photopic conditions, while the patient was sitting 2 meters away from the screen, with one (the tested) eye open. The patient was asked to look at the screen, on which sinusoidal impulses with gradually increasing contrast and decreasing frequency were demonstrated and was asked to push the button in front of them when they notice the lines. Spatial frequencies between 0.5 and 15 cycle/degree were evaluated. Contrast sensitivity was scored as grade 1, normal; grade 2, under the normal line beginning from high spatial frequencies (5 cycle/degree); grade 3, under the normal line beginning from low spatial frequencies (1 cycle/degree) for each eye.
VEP were also obtained via MetroVision using pattern reversal stimulus. Three electrodes were placed on patients head, after cleaning with alcohol swab and drying the related areas, The ground electrode was placed on the forehead, reference electrode was placed on the vertex and the active electrode was placed on the occipital scalp, all located on the midline. Then, patient was asked to look at the red fixation point at the center of a black-white chekerboard patterned screen, under scotopic conditions, while the pattern reverses every half-second. The latency and amplitude of the P100 potentials for each eye was recorded in milliseconds and microvolts, respectively. VEP is the physiologic response of the visual pathway from optic nerve to occipital cortex to a visual stimulus. The normal range of VEP latency for the P100 potential is 106±3 ms, and the VEP amplitude for the P100 potential is 9±4 μV for MetroVision device. Amplitudes lower than normal and/or delay in latency is considered pathological.
PASW Statistics 18 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for the statistical analysis. The significance level of α, for type I error was accepted as 0.05. The relationship between the higher and lower values of radiation dose-volume cut-off values and ophthalmologic tests was assessed using Pearson’s chi-square. Fisher’s exact test was used when expected numbers were less than 5 (expected frequencies). The visual acuities and VEP latency tests of patients with above tolerance doses on the eyeball and optic nerves were compared with those of patients with below tolerance doses. The risk of damage was determined by cross-tabulation odds ratio.
A total of 38 eyes of 19 patients were evaluated in the study. The median age of the patients was 45 years (range, 18 to 70 years), 57% of them were male. Lens Dmax was > 10 Gy in 58%, lacrimal gland Dmean was > 26 Gy in 11% of the eyes. For retina, Dmean and D10 were > 36 Gy and 60 Gy (respectively) in 18%; while for optic nerve and chiasm, Dmax were > 60 Gy in 13% and 21% of the eyes, respectively. A decrease in contrast sensitivity and progression in visual field were observed since the beginning of RT in 42% of the patients in the last visit.
At 24th month, a decrease in visual acuity was detected in 50% of the eyes whereas a progress in visual field defect was observed in 75% of them. Contrast sensitivity was decreased 67% of the eyes, while a prolonged latency and decreased amplitude of P100 wave in VEP was observed in 58% and 33% of the eyes, respectively.
In comparison of the eight patients with eyeball and/or optic nerve radiation doses above the tolerance dose/volume (group 1) with the 11 patients with radiation doses below the tolerance dose/volume (group 2); a decrease in visual acuity was observed in six eyes (0–4/10 Snellen lines) in group 1 and in one eye in group 2 (p < 0.001; odds, 6.759; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 14.47) at 36th month (
Eight patients who received radiation above tolerance doses on optic nerve and eyeball (group 1) were evaluated as a subgroup (
All patients who had any ocular pathology were followed and treated by ophthalmologists. Dry eye disease was treated with ocular lubricants, anti-inflammatory agents and artificial tear drops. The patient No. 6 required penetrating keratoplasty due to corneal perforation. Patient Nos. 1 and 2 underwent cataract surgery. In addition, while the patient Nos. 2 and 4 were treated with intravitreal injections for radiation retinopathy, patient No. 5 was evaluated as inoperable because of unfavorable results of retinal surgery in the eye with no light perception.
In eight of 11 patients with radiation doses below the tolerance limit (group 2), there were mild to moderate dry eye findings which responded well to topical therapy without any further complication.
It requires a wide range of knowledge to predict which parts of the eye-related structures in the field of RT will be affected by how much RT and what kind of sequela changes may develop. However, it remains unclear due to the lack of prospective, controlled studies. In this prospective study, 38 eyes of 19 patients who had RT for head and neck tumors were followed regularly with VEP, dry eye tests and complete ophthalmological examinations. In our study, corneal perforation, keratitis and corneal opacity were observed in between 1st and 24th month, in patients with anterior segment RT dose above 40 Gy. Anterior segment damage might be caused by the direct effect of RT on cornea and conjunctiva. Limbal stem cells located at the limbus—the junction of the cornea and sclera-, play an important role in keeping the cornea transparent and in the process of renewal of the epithelium. In limbal stem cell deficiency, ocular surface damage such as basement membrane damage of the corneal epithelium in acute or chronic inflammatory processes is expected to result with superficial vascularization of the cornea [
Radiation retinopathy is a progressive retinal vascular pathology characterized by capillary occlusion, microaneurysm formation, edema, telangiectasia, hemorrhage, retinal microvascular abnormalities and neovascularization [
In the same guideline, D0.03cm3 < 60 Gy is defined for the optic nerve. In our previous study, prolonged P100 wave latency in VEP and optic neuropathy were detected above Dmax 60 Gy in the late period [
Although the small number of patients were evaluated (due to disease progression and deaths), separate dose calculation of the anterior segment from the retina and the cut-off for the dose could be defined with examination findings and patient characteristics.
The primary limitation of this study is the low number of patients. The relapses of the disease and patient deaths resulted in a lower number of patients completing the study. Another limitation was the inability to evaluate the optic neuropathy which occurs as a late complication, in patients with keratitis and retinopathy, due to unreliable VEP tests. Despite these limitations, our study still provided valuable information about dose contraints of optical structures.
In our prospective study that we evaluate the radiation dose-volume effect with radiation-induced ocular complications, we came to the conclusion that awareness of anterior segment injury is as important as radiation-induced retinopathy. In addition to defining the volume separately from the retina, it should be known that major and minor tear glands and limbal stem cells on the corneal surface will contribute to the effect of RT. Especially for retinopathy, pre-existing systemic diseases should be known before treatment and it should be taken into consideration that lower doses may contribute to therapeutic toxicity.
Written informed consent was taken from all patients, and instructional review board approval was gathered from the Ege University Ethics Committee with protocol number 1226/474.
Conceived and designed the analysis: Akagunduz OO, Yilmaz SG, Tavlayan E.
Collected the data: Akagunduz OO, Yilmaz SG, Tavlayan E, Baris ME.
Contributed data or analysis tools: Akagunduz OO, Yilmaz SG, Afrashi F.
Performed the analysis: Akagunduz OO, Afrashi F, Esassolak M.
Wrote the paper: Akagunduz OO, Yilmaz SG, Baris ME.
Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.
Results of visual acuity compared between retina D10 < 60 Gy and ≥ 60 Gy. CI, confidence interval; D10, highest dose to 10% of the volume; OR, odds ratio.
Patient characteristics
Characteristic | No. (%) (n=19) |
---|---|
45 (19–70) | |
Female | 8 (42) |
Male | 11 (58) |
Nasal cavity | 8 (42) |
Paranasal sinus | 7 (37) |
Nasopharynx | 3 (16) |
Skin | 1 (5) |
II | 6 (32) |
III | 8 (42) |
IVA | 5 (26) |
None | 1 (5) |
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy | 16 (84) |
Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy | 2 (11) |
Adjuvant 60–66 Gy (2–2.06 Gy/fx) | 15 (79) |
Definitive 70 Gy (2.12 Gy/fx) | 4 (21) |
Diabetes mellitus | 8 (42) |
Hypertension | 10 (53) |
Alcohol consumption | 9 (47) |
VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Subgroup patients who received radiotheraphy above tolerance doses on optic nerve and/or eyeball
Patient (eye) | Lakrimal gland Dmean | Cornea Dmean | Retina Dmean | Retina D10 | Optic nerve D5 | Optic nerve Dmax | Chiasm Dmax |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (right) | 35 | 50 | 53 | 65 | 58 | 60 | 61 |
2 (left) | 17 | 36 | 36 | 67 | 70 | 71 | 56 |
3 (right) | 30 | 45 | 49 | 62 | 58 | 58 | 50 |
4 (right) | 33 | 49 | 53 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 53 |
5 (left) | 15 | 53 | 47 | 65 | 50 | 52 | 36 |
6 (right) | 26 | 44 | 47 | 65 | 70 | 71 | 56 |
7 (right) | 25 | 38 | 41 | 61 | 54 | 54 | 56 |
8 (right) | 12 | 15 | 20 | 46 | 66 | 68 | 55 |
D5, highest dose to 5% of the volume; D10, highest dose to 10% of the volume; Dmax, maximum dose; Dmean, mean dose.
Subgroup patients: VA, VF, CS, and VEP tests before the radiotherapy of the patients and after the treatment at 24th month, and 36th month for VA
Patient (eye) | VA 0 | VA 6 | VA 12 | VA 24 | VA 36 | VF 0 | VF 24 | CS 0 | CS 24 | VL 0 | VL24 | VA 0 | VA 24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (right) | 1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | NLP | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 120 | 117 | 5.1 | 3.6 |
2 (left) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 105 | 106 | 12.1 | 10.7 |
3 (right) | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 121 | 128 | 9.5 | 1.7 |
4 (right) | 1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | NLP | NLP | 2 | - | 2 | - | 112 | 128 | 10.7 | - |
5 (left) | 1 | 0.8 | NLP | NLP | NLP | 1 | - | 1 | - | 109 | - | 4.7 | - |
6 (right) | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | NLP | NLP | 1 | - | 1 | - | 103 | - | 3.0 | - |
7 (right) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 103 | 102 | 8.2 | 6.1 |
8 (right) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 102 | 103 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
CS, contrast sensitivity (grade); NLP, no light perception; VA, visual acuity; VEP, visual evoked potential; VF, visual field (grade).
Subgroup patients: the ophthalmologic examination findings
Patient (eye) | Dry eye severety levels | Retinopathy | Other ocular complications | Treatment |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 (right) | Severe | − | Keratitis and cataract | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops, anti-inflammatory agents, and cataract surgery |
2 (left) | Mild | + | Cataract | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops and intravitreal injection |
3 (right) | Modarete | − | − | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops, anti-inflammatory agents |
4 (right) | Modarate | + | + | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops, anti-inflammatory agents and intravitreal injection |
5 (left) | Modarate | + | Retinal detachment | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops, anti-inflammatory agents, considered as inoperable |
6 (right) | Severe | − | Corneal perforation | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops, anti-inflammatory agents and penetrating keratoplasty |
7 (right) | Mild | − | − | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops |
8 (right) | Mild | − | − | Ocular lubricants, artificial tear drops |