Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Whole brain radiotherapy"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Dummy Run of Quality Assurance Program before Prospective Study of Hippocampus-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiotherapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Multiple Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) 17-06 Study
Eunah Chung, Jae Myoung Noh, Kyu Chan Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Weon Kuu Chung, Yang-Gun Suh, Jung Ae Lee, Ki Ho Seol, Hong Gyun Wu, Yeon Sil Kim, O Kyu Noh, Jae Won Park, Dong Soo Lee, Jihae Lee, Young Suk Kim, Woo-Yoon Park, Min Kyu Kang, Sunmi Jo, Yong Chan Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1001-1010.   Published online October 15, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.415
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Lung Cancer Subcommittee of Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) has recently launched a prospective clinical trial (KROG 17-06) of hippocampus-sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in treating multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. In order to improve trial quality, dummy run studies among the participating institutions were designed. This work reported the results of two-step dummy run procedures of the KROG 17-06 study.
Materials and Methods
Two steps tested hippocampus contouring variability and radiation therapy planning compliance. In the first step, the variation of the hippocampus delineation was investigated for two representative cases using the Dice similarity coefficients. In the second step, the participating institutions were requested to generate a HS-WBRT with SIB treatment plan for another representative case. The compliance of the treatment plans to the planning protocol was evaluated.
Results
In the first step, the median Dice similarity coefficients of the hippocampus contours for two other dummy run cases changed from 0.669 (range, 0.073 to 0.712) to 0.690 (range, 0.522 to 0.750) and from 0.291 (range, 0.219 to 0.522) to 0.412 (range, 0.264 to 0.598) after providing the hippocampus contouring feedback. In the second step, with providing additional plan priority and extended dose constraints to the target volumes and normal structures, we observed the improved compliance of the treatment plans to the planning protocol.
Conclusion
The dummy run studies demonstrated the notable inter-institutional variability in delineating the hippocampus and treatment plan generation, which could be decreased through feedback from the trial center.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Radiotherapy trial quality assurance processes: a systematic review
    Chloe Brooks, Elizabeth Miles, Peter J Hoskin
    The Lancet Oncology.2024; 25(3): e104.     CrossRef
  • Durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer
    Sehhoon Park, Jae Myoung Noh, Yoon-La Choi, Sang Ah Chi, Kyunga Kim, Hyun Ae Jung, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jong-Mu Sun
    European Journal of Cancer.2022; 169: 42.     CrossRef
  • Region-Specific Effects of Fractionated Low-Dose Versus Single-Dose Radiation on Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Neuroinflammation
    Zoé Schmal, Claudia E. Rübe
    Cancers.2022; 14(22): 5477.     CrossRef
  • Non–coplanar whole brain radiotherapy is an effective modality for parotid sparing
    Jaehyeon Park, Jae Won Park, Ji Woon Yea
    Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine.2019; 36(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • 10,405 View
  • 287 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Effects of Postoperative Radiotherapy on Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis or Dural Metastasis after Resection of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients
Boram Ha, Seung Yeun Chung, Yeon-Joo Kim, Ho-Shin Gwak, Jong Hee Chang, Sang Hyun Lee, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Seeyoun Lee, Tae Hyun Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Seok-Gu Kang, Chang-Ok Suh
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):748-758.   Published online October 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.303
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
In this retrospective study, we compared the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis or dural metastasis (LMCDM) in patients who received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), partial radiotherapy (PRT), or no radiotherapy (RT) following resection of brain metastases from breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
Fifty-one patients with breast cancer underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed brain metastases in two institutions between March 2001 and March 2015. Among these, 34 received postoperative WBRT (n=24) or PRT (n=10) and 17 did not.
Results
With a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range, 2.3 to 83.6 months), 22/51 patients developed LMCDM at a median of 8.6 months (range, 4.8 to 51.2 months) after surgery. The 18-months LMCDM-free survival (LMCDM-FS) rates were 77.5%, 30.0%, and 13.6%, in the WBRT, PRT, and no RT groups, respectively (p=0.013). The presence of a tumor adjacent to cerebrospinal fluid flow and no systemic treatment after treatment for brain metastases were also associated with poor LMCDM-FS rate. Multivariate analysis showed that WBRT compared to PRT (p=0.009) and systemic treatment (p < 0.001) were independently associated with reduced incidence of LMCDM.
Conclusion
WBRT improved LMCDM-FS rate after resection of brain metastases compared to PRT in breast cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Stroke associated with microvascular tumoral infiltration in a patient with metastatic breast cancer
    Joshua Mangerel, Andres Rodriguez-Sein, Daniel Masri
    Radiology Case Reports.2025; 20(3): 1620.     CrossRef
  • Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis
    Joonho Byun, Jong Hyun Kim
    Brain Tumor Research and Treatment.2023; 11(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Literature Review: Role of Neurosurgery in Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
    Thaís Mitie Ogasawara, Thaís Yumi Kobayashi Batista, Rafael Rodrigues Pinheiro dos Santos, Ana Carla Mondek Rampazzo, Caroline Amane Pessoa Badaoui, Igor Ruan de Araújo Caetano, Jonathan Vinícius Martins, Maria Letícia Nogueira, José Ângelo Guarnieri, Car
    Arquivos Brasileiros de Neurocirurgia: Brazilian Neurosurgery.2023; 42(04): e337.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Following Craniotomy for Resection of Metastatic Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Case Report
    Brittany M. Stopa, Joshua A. Cuoco, Srijan Adhikari, Douglas J. Grider, Cara M. Rogers, Eric A. Marvin
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Autocrine GMCSF Signaling Contributes to Growth of HER2+ Breast Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
    Khairul I. Ansari, Arunoday Bhan, Mika Saotome, Antariksh Tyagi, Bony De Kumar, Clara Chen, Motoki Takaku, Rahul Jandial
    Cancer Research.2021; 81(18): 4723.     CrossRef
  • Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer
    Maria Alice Franzoi, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2019; 135: 85.     CrossRef
  • Leptomeningeal Metastases
    Jerome J. Graber, Santosh Kesari
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal dose and volume for postoperative radiotherapy in brain oligometastases from lung cancer: a retrospective study
    Seung Yeun Chung, Jong Hee Chang, Hye Ryun Kim, Byoung Chul Cho, Chang Geol Lee, Chang-Ok Suh
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2017; 35(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • 14,929 View
  • 290 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP