Purpose
Molecular biomarker testing is essential for lung cancer management and precision medicine. This study evaluated biomarker testing practices for non-small cell lung cancer across pathology laboratories in South Korea.
Materials and Methods
A nationwide survey of 30 pathology laboratories assessed testing policies, biomarker adoption, testing platforms, next-generation sequencing (NGS) implementation, reporting practices, turnaround times (TATs), and perceived challenges.
Results
All institutions routinely performed biomarker testing; 20 (66.7%) employed reflex testing at least in part. Tissue was the primary specimen type, and cytology and liquid biopsy specimens were accepted by 90.0% and 46.7% of institutions, respectively. For non-squamous NSCLC, all institutions tested EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and PD-L1, with additional testing for BRAF (86.7%) and KRAS (80.0%); other actionable targets were rarely tested outside NGS. In squamous NSCLC, PD-L1 was routinely assessed, whereas other drivers were tested less frequently. All institutions performed tissue-based NGS using companion diagnostic (CDx) and/or non-CDx platforms, and liquid biopsy–based NGS was available in 46.7% of institutions. Median TATs were 2–3, 5, 9, 19, and 15 days for immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence in situ hybridization, tissue-based NGS, and liquid biopsy–based NGS, respectively. Reported barriers included limited sample availability, workforce shortages, prolonged TATs, regulatory restrictions, and lack of standardization.
Conclusion
Biomarker testing is widely implemented in South Korea, with increasing integration of NGS. Despite alignment with international recommendations, systemic and policy reforms are needed to harmonize workflows, reduce variability, and optimize precision oncology.
Dae-Won Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Yu Jung Kim, Yaewon Yang, Jiyoung Rhee, Im Il Na, Kyung-Hun Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Sae-Won Han, In Sil Choi, Do-Youn Oh, Jee Hyun Kim, Tae-You Kim, Yung-Jue Bang
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):807-815. Published online January 18, 2017
Purpose
While tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA 19-9] and carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) can aid in the diagnosis of biliary tract cancer, their prognostic role has not been clearly elucidated. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic role of tumor markers and tumor marker change in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Materials and Methods
Patients with pathologically proven metastatic or relapsed biliary tract cancer who were treated in a phase II trial of first-line S-1 and cisplatin chemotherapy were enrolled. Serum tumor markers were measured at baseline and after the first cycle of chemotherapy.
Results
Among a total of 104 patients, 80 (77%) had elevated baseline tumor markers (69 with CA 19-9 elevation and 40 with CEA). A decline ≥ 30% of the elevated tumor marker level after the first cycle of chemotherapy conferred an improved time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and better chemotherapy response. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor marker decline as an independent positive prognostic factor of TTP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p=0.003) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.37; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results in each group of patients with CA 19-9 elevation and CEA elevation. In addition, elevated baseline CEA was associated with poor survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Tumor marker decline was associated with improved survival in biliary tract cancer. Measuring tumor marker after the first cycle of chemotherapy can be used as an early assessment of treatment outcome.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A survival prediction model for biliary tract cancer based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator–cox regression Shanshan Fan, Kexin Zhao, Ziwei Liang, Yang Ge Annals of Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: a real-world retrospective study Nan Zhou, Xinyi Li, Mingyou Gao, Xiaofen Li, Sirui Tan, Qiancheng Hu, Zijian Lu, Xi Xiao, Tianhong Wang, Shunyu Zhang, Haiyan Luo, Cheng Yi, Yu Yang, Hongfeng Gou Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in North-Central India and association of immunological markers, NLR, MLR and PLR in the diagnostic/prognostic prediction of GBC Jyotsna Singh, Durgesh Shukla, Sanjiv Gupta, Braj Raj Shrivastav, Pramod Kumar Tiwari Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2021; 28: 100431. CrossRef
Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei—A Novel Treatment Approach Aruna Prabhu, Andreas Brandl, Satoshi Wakama, Shouzou Sako, Haruaki Ishibashi, Akiyoshi Mizumoto, Nobuyuki Takao, Kousuke Noguchi, Shunsuke Motoi, Masumi Ichinose, Yang Liu, Yutaka Yonemura Cancers.2020; 12(8): 2212. CrossRef
Clinical and Translational Research Challenges in Biliary Tract Cancers Angela Lamarca, Melissa Frizziero, Mairéad G. McNamara, Juan W. Valle Current Medicinal Chemistry.2020; 27(29): 4756. CrossRef
Therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors in unresectable gallbladder cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin Min su You, Ji Kon Ryu, Young Hoon Choi, Jin Ho Choi, Gunn Huh, Woo Hyun Paik, Sang Hyub Lee, Yong-Tae Kim BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of interventional therapy and effect on inflammatory factors in patients with gastric cancer after chemotherapy Puzhao Wu, Jing Wang Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
CA19-9 kinetics during systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer Naminatsu Takahara, Yousuke Nakai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Kei Saito, Kensaku Noguchi, Tatsunori Suzuki, Tomoka Nakamura, Tatsuya Sato, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Rie Uchino, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogure, Minoru Tada Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2017; 80(6): 1105. CrossRef