Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Tumor biomarker"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Biomarker Testing Practices for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survey Insights from South Korean Pathology Laboratories
Sehui Kim, Dajeong Kim, Lucia Kim, Wan-Seop Kim
Received August 27, 2025  Accepted January 28, 2026  Published online January 30, 2026  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2025.927    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Molecular biomarker testing is essential for lung cancer management and precision medicine. This study evaluated biomarker testing practices for non-small cell lung cancer across pathology laboratories in South Korea.
Materials and Methods
A nationwide survey of 30 pathology laboratories assessed testing policies, biomarker adoption, testing platforms, next-generation sequencing (NGS) implementation, reporting practices, turnaround times (TATs), and perceived challenges.
Results
All institutions routinely performed biomarker testing; 20 (66.7%) employed reflex testing at least in part. Tissue was the primary specimen type, and cytology and liquid biopsy specimens were accepted by 90.0% and 46.7% of institutions, respectively. For non-squamous NSCLC, all institutions tested EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and PD-L1, with additional testing for BRAF (86.7%) and KRAS (80.0%); other actionable targets were rarely tested outside NGS. In squamous NSCLC, PD-L1 was routinely assessed, whereas other drivers were tested less frequently. All institutions performed tissue-based NGS using companion diagnostic (CDx) and/or non-CDx platforms, and liquid biopsy–based NGS was available in 46.7% of institutions. Median TATs were 2–3, 5, 9, 19, and 15 days for immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence in situ hybridization, tissue-based NGS, and liquid biopsy–based NGS, respectively. Reported barriers included limited sample availability, workforce shortages, prolonged TATs, regulatory restrictions, and lack of standardization.
Conclusion
Biomarker testing is widely implemented in South Korea, with increasing integration of NGS. Despite alignment with international recommendations, systemic and policy reforms are needed to harmonize workflows, reduce variability, and optimize precision oncology.
  • 444 View
  • 33 Download
Close layer
CA19-9 or CEA Decline after the First Cycle of Treatment Predicts Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Treated with S-1 and Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Dae-Won Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Yu Jung Kim, Yaewon Yang, Jiyoung Rhee, Im Il Na, Kyung-Hun Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Sae-Won Han, In Sil Choi, Do-Youn Oh, Jee Hyun Kim, Tae-You Kim, Yung-Jue Bang
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):807-815.   Published online January 18, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.326
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
While tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA 19-9] and carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) can aid in the diagnosis of biliary tract cancer, their prognostic role has not been clearly elucidated. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic role of tumor markers and tumor marker change in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Materials and Methods
Patients with pathologically proven metastatic or relapsed biliary tract cancer who were treated in a phase II trial of first-line S-1 and cisplatin chemotherapy were enrolled. Serum tumor markers were measured at baseline and after the first cycle of chemotherapy.
Results
Among a total of 104 patients, 80 (77%) had elevated baseline tumor markers (69 with CA 19-9 elevation and 40 with CEA). A decline ≥ 30% of the elevated tumor marker level after the first cycle of chemotherapy conferred an improved time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and better chemotherapy response. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor marker decline as an independent positive prognostic factor of TTP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p=0.003) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.37; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results in each group of patients with CA 19-9 elevation and CEA elevation. In addition, elevated baseline CEA was associated with poor survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Tumor marker decline was associated with improved survival in biliary tract cancer. Measuring tumor marker after the first cycle of chemotherapy can be used as an early assessment of treatment outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A survival prediction model for biliary tract cancer based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator–cox regression
    Shanshan Fan, Kexin Zhao, Ziwei Liang, Yang Ge
    Annals of Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: a real-world retrospective study
    Nan Zhou, Xinyi Li, Mingyou Gao, Xiaofen Li, Sirui Tan, Qiancheng Hu, Zijian Lu, Xi Xiao, Tianhong Wang, Shunyu Zhang, Haiyan Luo, Cheng Yi, Yu Yang, Hongfeng Gou
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in North-Central India and association of immunological markers, NLR, MLR and PLR in the diagnostic/prognostic prediction of GBC
    Jyotsna Singh, Durgesh Shukla, Sanjiv Gupta, Braj Raj Shrivastav, Pramod Kumar Tiwari
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2021; 28: 100431.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei—A Novel Treatment Approach
    Aruna Prabhu, Andreas Brandl, Satoshi Wakama, Shouzou Sako, Haruaki Ishibashi, Akiyoshi Mizumoto, Nobuyuki Takao, Kousuke Noguchi, Shunsuke Motoi, Masumi Ichinose, Yang Liu, Yutaka Yonemura
    Cancers.2020; 12(8): 2212.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Translational Research Challenges in Biliary Tract Cancers
    Angela Lamarca, Melissa Frizziero, Mairéad G. McNamara, Juan W. Valle
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2020; 27(29): 4756.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors in unresectable gallbladder cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin
    Min su You, Ji Kon Ryu, Young Hoon Choi, Jin Ho Choi, Gunn Huh, Woo Hyun Paik, Sang Hyub Lee, Yong-Tae Kim
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of interventional therapy and effect on inflammatory factors in patients with gastric cancer after chemotherapy
    Puzhao Wu, Jing Wang
    Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CA19-9 kinetics during systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer
    Naminatsu Takahara, Yousuke Nakai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takashi Sasaki, Kei Saito, Kensaku Noguchi, Tatsunori Suzuki, Tomoka Nakamura, Tatsuya Sato, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Rie Uchino, Suguru Mizuno, Hirofumi Kogure, Minoru Tada
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2017; 80(6): 1105.     CrossRef
  • 15,946 View
  • 207 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP