Purpose In Korea, the “Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life” was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force.
Materials and Methods The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019.
Results The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate.
Conclusion The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient’s determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unnecessary or harmful interventions.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions and Changes in Clinical Practice after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decision Act: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Korea Yoon Jung Jang, Yun Jung Yang, Hoi Jung Koo, Hye Won Yoon, Seongbeom Uhm, Sun Young Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Jin Won Huh, Tae Won Kim, Seyoung Seo Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 280. CrossRef
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study Song-I Lee, Ye-Rin Ju, Da Hyun Kang, Jeong Eun Lee BMC Palliative Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics of Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: National Data Analysis in South Korea Jiyeon Choi, Heejung Jeon, Ilhak Lee Asian Bioethics Review.2024; 16(1): 33. CrossRef
Recent Trends in the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease : 2017–2021 Seung Hwan Kim, Ji Hwan Jang, Young Zoon Kim, Kyu Hong Kim, Taek Min Nam Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2024; 67(1): 73. CrossRef
The Impact of Withdrawing or Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Nationwide Case-Control Study Based on Medical Cost Analysis Claire Junga Kim, Do-Kyong Kim, Sookyeong Mun, Minkook Son Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
For the Universal Right to Access Quality End-of-Life Care in Korea: Broadening Our Perspective After the 2018 Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act Hye Yoon Park, Min Sun Kim, Shin Hye Yoo, Jung Lee, In Gyu Song, So Yeon Jeon, Eun Kyung Choi Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Differences in end-of-life care patterns between types of hospice used for cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study Il Yun, Eun-Cheol Park, Chung Mo Nam, Jaeyong Shin, Suk-Yong Jang, Sung-In Jang BMC Palliative Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidemiology of patients who died in the emergency departments and need of end-of-life care in Korea from 2016 to 2019 Sun Young Lee, Young Sun Ro, Sang Do Shin, Eunsil Ko, Seong Jung Kim Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Use of high‐flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for patients with terminal cancer at the end of life Jung Sun Kim, Jeongmi Shin, Nam Hee Kim, Sun Young Lee, Shin Hye Yoo, Bhumsuk Keam, Dae Seog Heo Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(13): 14612. CrossRef
Preferred versus Actual Place of Care and Factors Associated with Home Discharge among Korean Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study In Young Hwang, Yohan Han, Min Sun Kim, Kyae Hyung Kim, Belong Cho, Wonho Choi, Yejin Kim, Shin Hye Yoo, Sun Young Lee Healthcare.2023; 11(13): 1939. CrossRef
Healthcare resource utilization and medical costs in patients with terminal cancer during best supportive care Dong-Won Kang, Yoon-Bo Shim, Eui-Kyung Lee, Mi-Hai Park, Wen-Chi Chou PLOS ONE.2022; 17(6): e0269565. CrossRef
Aggressiveness of care in the last days of life in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Korea Jung Sun Kim, Sun Young Lee, Min Sung Lee, Shin Hye Yoo, Jeongmi Shin, Wonho Choi, Yejin Kim, Hyung Sook Han, Jinui Hong, Bhumsuk Keam, Dae Seog Heo BMC Palliative Care.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of life-sustaining treatment decision law on pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation rate: A Korean population-based study Jaeyoung Choi, Ah Young Choi, Esther Park, Meong Hi Son, Joongbum Cho Resuscitation.2022; 180: 38. CrossRef
Association of perceived life satisfaction with attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment among the elderly in South Korea: a cross-sectional study Il Yun, Hyunkyu Kim, Eun-Cheol Park, Suk-Yong Jang BMC Palliative Care.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Willingness of patients with cancer pain to participate in end-of-life decisions: a multi-center cross-sectional study from three coastal provinces in southern China Xi Ke, Hongyu Zhu, Yu Zhang, Ling Yang, Simei Shi, Fang Zhu, Huiyu Luo BMC Palliative Care.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Law Changes Behaviors: Is It Just Enough? Dae Ho Lee Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(4): 895. CrossRef
Purpose
Older patient populations commonly have cognitive impairment, which might impact decisional capacity. We examined patients and family caregivers preferences for family involvement in treatment decision making assuming different level of cognitive impairment, and sought to explore the factors associated with the preferences and the degree to which patients and family members agree on preferences.
Materials and Methods
A total of 358 elderly cancer patient and caregiver dyads were recruited from the 11 cancer centers in Korea andwere asked to express their preferences forfamily involvement in treatment decision making using hypothetical scenarios with three different levels of cognitive status (intact, mild impairment, and severe impairment).
Results
Both patients and family caregivers preferred greater family dominance in treatment decision makingwith the increasing the level of cognitive impairment (39.7%, 60.9%, and 86.6% for patients and 45.0%, 66.2%, and 89.7% for caregivers in each scenarios). Patient and family caregiver concordance in decisional control preference was small for all three scenarios (weighted κ=0.32, κ=0.26, and κ=0.36, respectively). Higher patient education was associated with preference for patient dominance in treatment decision in conditions of both mild and severe cognitive impairment. The association of higher patient education and patient-caregiver preference concordance was positive with intact cognition, while it was negative with severe cognitive impairment.
Conclusion
Decision control preferences were affected by hypothesized cognitive status of the patients. Findings from our study would be helpful to develop effective strategy for optimizing family involvement in cancer treatment decision in the context of deteriorating cognitive function of the patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comorbid Dementia and Cancer Therapy Decision-Making: A Scoping Review Sean N. Halpin, Gabriel Alain, Aaron Seaman, Erin E. Stevens, Hui Zhao, Mackenzie E. Fowler, Qiuyang Zhang, Tamara Cadet, Minzhi Ye, Jessica L. Krok-Schoen Journal of Applied Gerontology.2024; 43(8): 1132. CrossRef
Assessing the association between quantity and quality of family caregiver participation in decision-making clinical encounters on patient activation in the metastatic breast cancer setting Nicole L. Henderson, Tanvi Padalkar, Garrett Bourne, Emma K. Hendrix, Courtney P. Williams, J. Nicholas Odom, Kristen Triebel, Gabrielle B. Rocque Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Fatalism and metaphor in Confucianism: A qualitative study of barriers to genetic testing among first‐degree relatives of hereditary cancer patients from China Chaonan Jiang, Li Liu, Ye Wang, Liangzheng Wu, Wenxia Zhang, Xiaodan Wu Psycho-Oncology.2023; 32(2): 275. CrossRef
The Role of Nurse on the Treatment Decision Support for Older People with Cancer: A Systematic Review Hiroko Komatsu, Yasuhiro Komatsu Healthcare.2023; 11(4): 546. CrossRef
A prospective cohort study of decision‐making role preferences of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers Semra Ozdemir, Sean Ng, Isha Chaudhry, Chetna Malhotra, Eric Andrew Finkelstein Cancer.2023; 129(9): 1443. CrossRef
Cancer literacy among Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors and informal carers: Qualitative explorations Samar J. Melhem, Shereen Nabhani-Gebara, Reem Kayyali Frontiers in Public Health.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Preferred and actual involvement of caregivers in oncologic treatment decision-making: A systematic review Laura M.L. Tielemans, Kirsten D. van Heugten, Marije E. Hamaker, Inez C. van Walree Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(6): 101525. CrossRef
Factors Affecting Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Treatment of Myeloma and Indolent Lymphoma Chia Jie Tan, Melinda Si Yun Tan, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng, Yen-Lin Chee, Melissa Ooi, Lawrence Cheng Kiat Ng, Yunxin Chen, Joanne Su Yin Yoong, Xin Yi Wong, Wei-Ying Jen JCO Oncology Practice.2023; 19(12): 1168. CrossRef
The Association Between Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis and Patient Treatment Preferences: a Survey of Older Adults Deborah A. Levine, Andrzej T. Galecki, Brenda L. Plassman, Angela Fagerlin, Lauren P. Wallner, Kenneth M. Langa, Rachael T. Whitney, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Lewis B. Morgenstern, Bailey K. Reale, Emilie M. Blair, Bruno Giordani, Kathleen Anne Welsh-Bohme Journal of General Internal Medicine.2022; 37(8): 1925. CrossRef
Patient activation and treatment decision-making in the context of cancer: examining the contribution of informal caregivers’ involvement Chiara Acquati, Judith H. Hibbard, Ellen Miller-Sonet, Anao Zhang, Elena Ionescu Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2022; 16(5): 929. CrossRef
Factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer: A scoping review Bea L. Dijkman, Marie Louise Luttik, Hanneke Van der Wal-Huisman, Wolter Paans, Barbara L. van Leeuwen Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2022; 13(4): 391. CrossRef
The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol Clizia Cincidda, Serena Oliveri, Virginia Sanchini, Gabriella Pravettoni Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A qualitative study Ni Gong, Qianqian Du, Hongyu Lou, Yiheng Zhang, Hengying Fang, Xueying Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Ya Meng, Meifen Zhang Nursing Ethics.2021; 28(2): 242. CrossRef
Family Caregiving Situations and Engagement in Advance Care Planning Kyeongmo Kim, Michin Hong, Thomas Buckley Journal of Palliative Medicine.2020; 23(1): 125. CrossRef
What We Talk about When We Talk about Caregiving: The Distribution of Roles in Cancer Patient Caregiving in a Family-Oriented Culture Ansuk Jeong, Dongwook Shin, Jong Hyock Park, Keeho Park Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 141. CrossRef
Experience with age discrimination and attitudes toward ageism in older patients with cancer and their caregivers: A nationwide Korean survey Dong Wook Shin, Keeho Park, Ansuk Jeong, Hyung Kook Yang, So Young Kim, Mihee Cho, Jong Hyock Park Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2019; 10(3): 459. CrossRef
How family caregivers of persons with advanced cancer assist with upstream healthcare decision-making: A qualitative study J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom, Deborah Ejem, Rachel Wells, Amber E. Barnato, Richard A. Taylor, Gabrielle B. Rocque, Yasemin E. Turkman, Matthew Kenny, Nataliya V. Ivankova, Marie A. Bakitas, Michelle Y. Martin, Mojtaba Vaismoradi PLOS ONE.2019; 14(3): e0212967. CrossRef