Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
59 "Surgery"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Large Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Asian Population
Jong Won Park, Seowoong Jun, Ki Chang Keum, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Kyung Hwan Kim
Received June 20, 2024  Accepted December 28, 2024  Published online December 31, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.580    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
To investigate the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with large uveal melanoma (UM).
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of 64 consecutive patients with UM treated with Cyberknife at Yonsei Cancer Center from September 2015 to October 2021. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range 48-64 Gy) administered in four fractions every alternate day. The local failure-free rate (LFFR), distant metastasis-free rate (DMFR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze the predictive factors affecting survival outcomes and the factors associated with vision loss.
Results
The median tumor diameter and height were 11.5 mm and 8.4 mm, respectively. After a median follow-up of 32.1 months (range 4.9–89.9), the 3-year LFFR, DMFR, PFS, and OS were 89.5%, 70.5%, 65.5%, and 89.4%, respectively. Enucleation was performed in 13 (20.3%) patients, with three cases attributed to disease progression. A larger tumor diameter was associated with significantly worse DMFR (HR=1.35, p=0.015) and OS (HR=1.49, p=0.026) in the multivariate analysis. Regarding visual prognosis, 41 (64.1%) patients had baseline visual acuity ≥20/200, but only 4 (6.3%) patients maintained visual acuity ≥20/200 by the final follow-up. Initial visual acuity ≥20/40 (HR 0.45, p=0.030) was the single favorable significant factor predicting visual retention ≥20/200 in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
SBRT using CyberKnife demonstrated a comparable local control rate to that observed in historical studies for patients with large UM. Distant metastasis and treatment-related ocular toxicity remain the limitations of this treatment.
  • 166 View
  • 10 Download
Close layer
Lung and Thoracic cancer
Upfront Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Brain Metastases from Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of a 10-Year Bi-institutional Experience
Myungsoo Kim, Jihye Cha, Hun Jung Kim, Woo Chul Kim, Jeongshim Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(1):47-56.   Published online July 3, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.223
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) are increasingly used as initial therapies for brain metastases (BM). We aimed to assess the outcomes of SRS/FSRT in patients aged ≥ 65 years who had 1-10 BM from non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 91 elderly NSCLC patients with 222 BM who were treated with SRS/FSRT at two institutions between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after SRS/FSRT. In addition, in-field local control (IFLC) within the treated field was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors affecting OS and IFLC.
Results
During a median follow-up of 18 months, the median OS was 32 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 69.8% and 56.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the NSCLC-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score (p=0.007) and administration of systemic therapy (p=0.039) were defined as prognosticators affecting OS. The median IFLC period was 31 months, and the 1- and 2-year IFLC rates were 75.9% and 57.6%, respectively. The total BM volume (p=0.042) significantly affected IFLC. No severe adverse events were reported after SRS/FSRT.
Conclusion
SRS/FSRT is an effective upfront treatment option for BM arising from NSCLC in elderly patients, with a good OS without severe side effects. Higher GPA score and active systemic treatment were associated with improved OS, indicating that elderly patients are significant candidates for SRS/FSRT.
  • 1,164 View
  • 100 Download
Close layer
Clinical Effect of Endosonography on Overall Survival in Patients with Radiological N1 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Bo-Guen Kim, Byeong-Ho Jeong, Goeun Park, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim, Sun Hye Shin, Kyungjong Lee, Sang-Won Um, Hojoong Kim, Jong Ho Cho
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(2):502-512.   Published online December 4, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.840
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
It is unclear whether performing endosonography first in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with radiological N1 (rN1) has any advantages over surgery without nodal staging. We aimed to compare surgery without endosonography to performing endosonography first in rN1 on the overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective analysis of patients with rN1 NSCLC between 2013 and 2019. Patients were divided into ‘no endosonography’ and ‘endosonography first’ groups. We investigated the effect of nodal staging through endosonography on OS using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
Results
In the no endosonography group, pathologic N2 occurred in 23.0% of patients. In the endosonography first group, endosonographic N2 and N3 occurred in 8.6% and 1.6% of patients, respectively. Additionally, 51 patients were pathologic N2 among 249 patients who underwent surgery and mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) in endosonography first group. After PSM, the 5-year OSs were 68.1% and 70.6% in the no endosonography and endosonography first groups, respectively. However, the 5-year OS was 80.2% in the subgroup who underwent surgery and MLND of the endosonography first group. Moreover, in patients receiving surgical resection with MLND, the endosonography first group tended to have a better OS than the no endosonography group in adjusted analysis using various models.
Conclusion
In rN1 NSCLC, preoperative endosonography shows better OS than surgery without endosonography. For patients with rN1 NSCLC who are candidates for surgery, preoperative endosonography may help improve survival through patient selection.
  • 2,873 View
  • 103 Download
Close layer
Aggressive Local Ablative Radiotherapy Mitigates Progression Risk in Oligometastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma
Gowoon Yang, Kyung Hwan Kim, Chang Geol Lee, Min Hee Hong, Hye Ryun Kim, Yeona Cho, Hong In Yoon
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):115-124.   Published online August 29, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.600
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to determine the role of local ablative radiotherapy (LART) in oligometastatic/oligoprogressive lung adenocarcinoma.
Materials and Methods
Patients (n=176) with oligometastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with LART were identified, and those treated with LART at the initial diagnosis of synchronous oligometastatic disease (OMD group) or treated with LART when they presented with repeat oligoprogression (OPD group) were included.
Results
In the OMD group (n=54), the 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 50.9% and 22.5%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 3-year overall survival in the OPD group were 75.9% and 58.1%, respectively. Forty-one patients (75.9%) received LART at all gross disease sites. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use and all-metastatic site LART were significant predictors of higher PFS (p=0.018 and p=0.046, respectively). In patients treated with TKIs at the time of LART (n=23) and those treated with all-metastatic site LART, the 1-year PFS was 86.7%, while that of patients not treated with all-metastatic site LART was 37.5% (p=0.006). In the OPD group (n=122), 67.2% of the patients (n=82) maintained a systemic therapy regimen after LART. The cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy was 39.6%, 62.9%, and 78.5% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after LART, respectively.
Conclusion
Aggressive LART can be an option to improve survival in patients with oligometastatic disease. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease receiving TKI and all-metastatic site LART may have improved PFS. In patients with repeat oligoprogression, LART might potentially extend survival by delaying the need to change the systemic treatment regimen.
  • 2,974 View
  • 183 Download
Close layer
Sublobar Resection versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinical Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Study Using Data from the Korean Nationwide Lung Cancer Registry
Jeonghee Yun, Jong Ho Cho, Tae Hee Hong, Kyungmi Yang, Yong Chan Ahn, Hong Kwan Kim, Korean Association for Lung Cancer, Korea Central Cancer Registry
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1171-1180.   Published online April 17, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1581
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) had been increasingly recognized as a favorable alternative to surgical resection in patients with high risk for surgery. This study compared survival outcomes between sublobar resection (SLR) and SBRT for clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
Data were obtained from the Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry, a sampled nationwide database. This study retrospectively reviewed 382 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent curative SLR or SBRT from 2014 to 2016.
Results
Of the patients, 43 and 339 underwent SBRT and SLR, respectively. Patients in the SBRT group were older and had worse pulmonary function. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in the SLR group compared with the SBRT group (86.6% vs. 57%, log-rank p < 0.001). However, after adjusting for age, sex, tumor size, pulmonary function, histology, smoking history, and adjuvant therapy, treatment modality was not an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.43 to 2.77; p=0.974). We performed subgroup analysis in the following high-risk populations: patients who were older than 75 years; patients who were older than 70 years and had diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide ≤ 80%. In each subgroup, there were no differences in OS and recurrence-free survival between patients who underwent SLR and those who received SBRT.
Conclusion
In our study, there were no significant differences in terms of survival or recurrence between SBRT and SLR in medically compromised stage I NSCLC patients. Our findings suggest that SBRT could be considered as a potential treatment option for selected patients.
  • 3,692 View
  • 197 Download
Close layer
Clinical Outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Lung Cancer with Ground-Glass Opacity Predominant Lesions: A Single Institution Experience
Jeong Yun Jang, Su Ssan Kim, Si Yeol Song, Young Seob Shin, Sei Won Lee, Wonjun Ji, Chang-Min Choi, Eun Kyung Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1181-1189.   Published online March 21, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1656
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The detection rate of early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity (GGO) has increased, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as an alternative to surgery in inoperable patients. However, reports on treatment results are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical outcome after SBRT in patients with early-stage lung cancer with GGO-predominant tumor lesions at a single institution.
Materials and Methods
This study included 89 patients with 99 lesions who were treated with SBRT for lung cancer with GGO-predominant lesions that had a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of ≤0.5 at Asan Medical Center between July 2016 and July 2021. A median total dose of 56.0 Gy (range, 48.0–60.0) was delivered using 10.0–15.0 Gy per fraction.
Results
The overall follow-up period for the study was median 33.0 months (range, 9.9 to 65.9 months). There was 100% local control with no recurrences in any of the 99 treated lesions. Three patients had regional recurrences outside of the radiation field, and three had distant metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 91.6%, and 82.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that advanced age and a low level of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were significantly associated with overall survival. There were no patients with grade ≥3 toxicity.
Conclusion
SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GGO-predominant lung cancer lesions and is likely to be considered as an alternative to surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recent Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review
    Jibran Ahmad Khan, Ibrahem Albalkhi, Sarah Garatli, Marcello Migliore
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(11): 3354.     CrossRef
  • The clinical effect of thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the treatment of lung malignancies less than 2CM in diameter
    Yafeng Zhang, Renzhong Shi, Xiaoming Xia, Kaiyao Zhang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy
    Jintao Ma, Shaonan Fan, Wenhan Huang, Xiaohong Xu, Yong Hu, Jian He
    Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3,847 View
  • 224 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
General
Role of Local Treatment for Oligometastasis: A Comparability-Based Meta-Analysis
Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Jong Hoon Lee, Young Seok Kim, Yang-Gun Suh, Kyung Hwan Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Yong Chan Ahn, The Oligometastasis Working Group, Korea Cancer Association
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(4):953-969.   Published online August 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.329
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
We intend to investigate the oncological efficacy and feasibility of local consolidative therapy (LCT) through a meta-analysis method.
Materials and Methods
Four databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched. Target studies are controlled trials comparing outcomes of LCT versus a control group. Primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
A total of 54 studies involving 7,242 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed that the LCT arm could achieve improved OS with pooled odds ratio of 2.896 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.377 to 3.528; p < 0.001). Regarding PFS, pooled analyses showed pooled odds ratio of 3.045 (95% CI, 2.356 to 3.937; p < 0.001) in favor of the LCT arm. In the subgroup analyses including the studies with reliable comparability (e.g. randomized studies or intentionally matched studies without significant favorable prognosticator in LCT arms), pooled odds ratio was 2.548 (95% CI, 1.808 to 3.591; p < 0.001) favoring the LCT arm regarding OS. Regarding PFS, pooled OR was 2.656 (95% CI, 1.713 to 4.120; p < 0.001) which also favored the LCT arm. Subgroup analyses limited to the randomized controlled trials (RCT) were also performed and pooled odds ratios on OS and PFS were 1.535 (95% CI, 1.082 to 2.177; p=0.016) and 1.668 (95% CI, 1.187 to 2.344; p=0.003). The rates of grade ≥ 3 complications related to LCT was mostly low (< 10%) and not significantly higher compared to the control arm.
Conclusion
Pooled analyses results of all included studies, selected studies with reliable comparability, and RCT’s demonstrated the survival benefit of LCT. These consistent results suggest that LCT was beneficial to the patients with oligometastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identifying Trends in Oncology Research through a Bibliographic Analysis of Cancer Research and Treatment
    Choong-kun Lee, Jeong Min Choo, Yong Chan Ahn, Jin Kim, Sun Young Rha, Chai Hong Rim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Clinical Practice Guideline on Surgical Management of Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Mara B. Antonoff, Kyle G. Mitchell, Samuel S. Kim, Hai V. Salfity, Svetlana Kotova, Robert Taylor Ripley, Alfonso L. Neri, Pallavi Sood, Saumil G. Gandhi, Yasir Y. Elamin, Jessica S. Donington, David R. Jones, Elizabeth A. David, Stephen G. Swisher, Isabe
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Aggressive Local Ablative Radiotherapy Mitigates Progression Risk in Oligometastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Gowoon Yang, Kyung Hwan Kim, Chang Geol Lee, Min Hee Hong, Hye Ryun Kim, Yeona Cho, Hong In Yoon
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(1): 115.     CrossRef
  • MR-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic oligometastases: Evaluation of toxicity and dosimetric parameters
    Mette van Overeem Felter, Pia Krause Møller, Mirjana Josipovic, Susanne Nørring Bekke, Uffe Bernchou, Eva Serup-Hansen, Kasper Madsen, Parag J. Parikh, Joshua Kim, Poul Geertsen, Claus P. Behrens, Ivan R. Vogelius, Mette Pøhl, Tine Schytte, Gitte Fredberg
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2024; 192: 110090.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of neck dissection for metastatic lymph nodes originating from non-head and neck regions
    Min Ji Kim, So Hee Kang, MinSu Kwon, Young Ho Jung, Seung-Ho Choi, Soon Yuhl Nam, Yoon Se Lee
    Acta Oto-Laryngologica.2024; 144(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Surgery for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Biologic Resectability
    Shruti Koti, Lyudmyla Demyan, Gary Deutsch, Matthew Weiss
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(6): 4031.     CrossRef
  • Radiation Oncologists’ Perspectives on Oligometastatic Disease: A Korean Survey Study
    Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Jong Hoon Lee, Young Seok Kim, Yang-Gun Suh, Kyung Hwan Kim, Ah Ram Chang, Eui Kyu Chie, Yong Chan Ahn
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(2): 414.     CrossRef
  • Radiation Oncologists’ Perspectives on Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Survey from Korean Oligometastasis Working Group
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Sunmin Park, Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Ah Ram Chang, Young Seok Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Eui Kyu Chie
    Current Oncology.2024; 31(6): 3239.     CrossRef
  • Local Ablative Therapy Combined With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Synchronous Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Recursive Partitioning Analysis
    Hye In Lee, Eun Kyung Choi, Su Ssan Kim, Young Seob Shin, Junhee Park, Chang-Min Choi, Shinkyo Yoon, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Young Hyun Cho, Si Yeol Song
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2024; 120(3): 698.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Surgical Resection of Adrenal Metastases from Solid Tumors
    Jamie Lütscher, Hans Gelpke, Adrian Zehnder, Laetitia Mauti, Christian Padevit, Hubert John, Nidar Batifi, Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen, Robert Förster, Christina Schröder
    Cancers.2024; 16(15): 2655.     CrossRef
  • A new proposal of simplified classification of non-small cell lung cancer oligometastases for easy applicability through systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation
    Hanseung Kang, Woohyeon Do, Yong Chan Ahn, Eui Kyu Chie, Chai Hong Rim
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 212: 115043.     CrossRef
  • Oligometastasis: More Lessons to Be Learned
    Kyung Hwan Kim, Yong Chan Ahn
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Top Ten Lessons Learned from Trials in Oligometastatic Cancers
    Vivian S. Tan, David A. Palma
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Genomic Characteristics and the Potential Clinical Implications in Oligometastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Rongxin Liao, Kehong Chen, Jinjin Li, Hengqiu He, Guangming Yi, Mingfeng Huang, Rongrong Chen, Lu Shen, Xiaoyue Zhang, Zaicheng Xu, Zhenzhou Yang, Yuan Peng
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(3): 814.     CrossRef
  • Metastasis-Directed Local Therapy of Hepatic Oligometastasis from Colorectal Cancer and Future Perspective in Radiation Therapy
    Gyu Sang Yoo, Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Jae-Uk Jeong, Eui Kyu Chie, Hyeon-Min Cho, Jun Won Um, Yong Chan Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(3): 707.     CrossRef
  • Barriers in Oligometastasis Care in Korea: Radiation Oncologists’ Perspectives
    Eui Kyu Chie, Chai Hong Rim, Won Kyung Cho, Yong Chan Ahn
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1063.     CrossRef
  • Impact of high dose radiotherapy for breast tumor in locoregionally uncontrolled stage IV breast cancer: a need for a risk-stratified approach
    Nalee Kim, Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Tae Gyu Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Yeon Hee Park, Ji-Yeon Kim
    Radiation Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oligometastasis: Expansion of Curative Treatments in the Field of Oncology
    Ah Reum Lim, Chai Hong Rim
    Medicina.2023; 59(11): 1934.     CrossRef
  • Treating Oligometastses, Prelude or Just Hassles of Systemic Treatment
    Dae Ho Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 54(4): 951.     CrossRef
  • 6,689 View
  • 331 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 19 Crossref
Close layer
Gynecologic cancer
Effect of BRCA1/2 Mutational Status on Survival Outcomes According to Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery and Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Real-World Evidence Study
Se Ik Kim, Hyunji Lim, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song, Maria Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(1):245-257.   Published online July 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.232
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the impact of BRCA1/2 mutational status on survival outcomes in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively identified patients who received secondary treatment for PSR EOC at our institution between January 2007 and June 2021 and who underwent BRCA1/2 gene testing by either germline or somatic methods. The association between BRCA1/2 mutational status and survival outcomes was evaluated. Both secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and maintenance therapy were stratified considering real-world clinical practice.
Results
Of 262 patients, 91 (34.7%) and 171 (65.3%) were assigned to BRCA1/2 mutation and wild-type groups, respectively. The two groups had similar proportions of patients undergoing secondary CRS (26.4% vs. 32.7%, p=0.286) and maintenance therapy (54.9% vs. 46.2%, p=0.178). Overall, no differences in progression-free survival (PFS; median, 19.7 vs. 15.1 months, p=0.120) and overall survival (OS; p=0.400) were observed between the two groups. In multivariate analyses, BRCA1/2 mutational status was not associated with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.816; 95% confidence interval, 0.596 to 1.119; p=0.207). BRCA1/2 mutational status did not affect PFS among patients who underwent secondary CRS (n=80) and among those who did not (n=182) (p=0.074 and p=0.222, respectively). PFS did not differ in the BRCA1/2 mutational status among the patients who received bevacizumab maintenance (n=90, p=0.992).
Conclusion
In this real-world evidence study, BRCA1/2 mutational status itself was not associated with PFS and OS in PSR EOC, which was consistent with whether secondary CRS or not and with bevacizumab maintenance.
  • 4,393 View
  • 154 Download
Close layer
Breast cancer
Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy after Primary Tumor Resection in De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 19-02)
Yeon Joo Kim, Yeon-Joo Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Ik Jae Lee, Jeanny Kwon, Kyubo Kim, Jihye Cha, Myungsoo Kim, In Young Jo, Jung Hoon Kim, Jaehyeon Park, Jin Hee Kim, Juree Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Su Ssan Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):478-487.   Published online July 12, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.632
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) patients undergoing planned primary tumor resection (PTR) and to identify the subgroup of patients who would most benefit from PORT.
Materials and Methods
This study enrolled 426 patients with dnMBC administered PTR alone or with PORT. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS), respectively.
Results
The median follow-up time was 53.7 months (range, 3.1 to 194.4). The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 73.2% and 32.0%, respectively. For OS, clinical T3/4 category, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), postoperative chemotherapy alone were significantly poor prognostic factors, and administration of PORT failed to show its significance. Regarding PFS, PORT was a favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.82; p < 0.001), in addition to T1/2 category, ≤ 5 metastases, and non-TNBC. According to the multivariate analyses of OS in the PORT group, we divided the patients into three groups (group 1, T1/2 and non-TNBC [n=193]; group 2, T3/4 and non-TNBC [n=171]; and group 3, TNBC [n=49]), and evaluated the effect of PORT. Although PORT had no significance for OS in all subgroups, it was a significant factor for good prognosis regarding PFS in groups 1 and 2, not in group 3.
Conclusion
PORT was associated with a significantly better PFS in patients with dnMBC who underwent PTR. Patients with clinical T1/2 category and non-TNBC benefited most from PORT, while those with TNBC showed little benefit.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Letter to the editor for the article“Tumor margin irregularity degree is an important preoperative predictor of adverse pathology for clinical T1/2 renal cell carcinoma and the construction of predictive model”
    Yaping Miao, Lexin Wang, Ping Chen, Jiaan Lu, Guanhu Yang, Hao Chi
    World Journal of Urology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic differences and the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy between post‐chemotherapy ypT1‐2ypN1 and de novo pT1‐2N1 breast cancer
    Tian Yang, Xiaorong Zhong, Jun Wang, Zhongzheng Xiang, Yuanyuan Zeng, Siting Yu, Zelei Dai, Ningyue Xu, Ting Luo, Lei Liu
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(7): 8112.     CrossRef
  • Impact of high dose radiotherapy for breast tumor in locoregionally uncontrolled stage IV breast cancer: a need for a risk-stratified approach
    Nalee Kim, Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Tae Gyu Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Yeon Hee Park, Ji-Yeon Kim
    Radiation Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Machine learning predicts the prognosis of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases
    Chaofan Li, Mengjie Liu, Jia Li, Weiwei Wang, Cong Feng, Yifan Cai, Fei Wu, Xixi Zhao, Chong Du, Yinbin Zhang, Yusheng Wang, Shuqun Zhang, Jingkun Qu
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Influencing Prognosis in Patients with De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Meilin Zhang, Zining Jin, Yingying Xu, Bo Chen, Jian Song, Muyao Li, Feng Jin, Ang Zheng
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,284 View
  • 170 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Head and Neck cancer
Radiotherapy versus Surgery in Early-Stage HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer
Dong-Yun Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Jin Ho Kim, Joo Ho Lee, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Keun-Yong Eom, Young Ho Jung, Woo-Jin Jeong, Tack-Kyun Kwon, Suzy Kim, Chan Woo Wee
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(2):406-416.   Published online June 23, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.441
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of primary radiotherapy (RT) versus surgery in early-stage human papilloma virus–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (hpv+OPC), and investigate the preoperative clinical factors that can predict the requirement for postoperative adjuvant treatment.
Materials and Methods
This multicenter study included 166 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition-Stages I-II hpv+OPC. Sixty (36.1%) and 106 (63.9%) patients underwent primary (concurrent chemo)radiotherapy [(CC)RT] and surgery, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (73.6%) in the surgery group received postoperative (CC)RT.
Results
With a median follow-up of 45.6 months for survivors, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LC) for RT/surgery were 97.8%/96.4%, 91.1%/92.0%, and 92.9%/93.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, patients with synchronous radiologic extranodal extension and conglomeration (ENEcong) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) showed significantly poorer OS (p=0.047), PFS (p=0.001), and LC (p=0.003). In patients undergoing primary surgery, two or more clinically positive LN metastases (odds ratio [OR], 5.15; p=0.004) and LN metastases with ENEcong (OR, 3.75; p=0.009) were predictors of postoperative chemoradiotherapy. No patient in the primary RT group demonstrated late severe toxicity whereas three (2.8%), one (0.9%), and one (0.9%) patient in the surgery group showed grade 3 dysphagia, grade 3 xerostomia, and fatal oral cavity bleeding.
Conclusion
We found no differences in OS, PFS, and LC between upfront RT and surgery in stage I-II hpv+OPC which warrants comparison through a prospective trial in the treatment de-escalation era. However, most early-stage hpv+OPC patients undergoing surgery received adjuvant (CC)RT. Pretreatment LN findings were prognostic and predictive for adjuvant treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Definitive radio(chemo)therapy versus upfront surgery in the treatment of HPV-related localized or locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Jérémy Baude, Caroline Guigou, David Thibouw, Noémie Vulquin, Mireille Folia, Guillaume Constantin, Jihane Boustani, Christian Duvillard, Sylvain Ladoire, Gilles Truc, Aurélie Bertaut, Cédric Chevalier, Scott M. Langevin
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(7): e0307658.     CrossRef
  • INFLUENCE OF CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY IN COMBINATION WITH RADIOMODIFIERS ON THE CONTENT OF VEGF, COX-2, AND PGE-2 IN BLOOD SERUM OF PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
    N. MITRYAYEVA, L. GREBINYK, S. ARTIUKH, N. BILOZOR, V. STARENKIY
    Experimental Oncology.2024; 46(3): 253.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Radiologic Extranodal Extension Using Combinatorial Analysis of Nodal Margin Breakdown and Metastatic Burden in Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Sungryeal Kim, Hannah Park, Se Hyun Yeou, Jin Roh, Yoo Seob Shin, Chul-Ho Kim, Eun Ju Ha, Jeon Yeob Jang
    Cancers.2023; 15(13): 3276.     CrossRef
  • Expanding the role of combined immunochemotherapy and immunoradiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancer (Review)
    Chun Wei, Xiaojun Lan, Maona Qiu, Ran Cui, Qiuxia Fu, Shafiu Umar Shinge, Tobias Muluh, Ou Jiang
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,562 View
  • 218 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Larynx-preserving Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Comparison with Definitive Radiation-based Treatment
Donghyeok Kim, Nalee Kim, Sungmin Koh, Man Ki Chung, Young-Ik Son, Dongryul Oh, Han-Sin Jeong, Yong Chan Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):84-95.   Published online March 26, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1197
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Larynx-preserving surgery (LPS) have recently gained popularity and achieved comparable oncologic outcomes to conventional radical surgery for localized hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC). In the current study, the role of LPS has been assessed thoroughly in comparison with upfront radiation therapy (RT).
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 185 candidates for LPS with cT1-2 disease; 59 patients underwent upfront LPS while 126 patients received upfront RT, respectively. Oncological and functional outcomes were investigated and compared.
Results
Following LPS, safe margin (≥ 5 mm) was achieved in 37.3% of patients. Overall, better clinical outcomes at 5 years were achieved following upfront LPS than those following upfront RT: overall survival (OS) (72.7% vs. 59.0%, p=0.045), disease-free survival (DFS) (59.8% vs. 45.0%, p=0.039), and functional laryngeal preservation (100% vs. 89.7%, p=0.010). Although similar outcomes were observed in patients with cT1 disease, better 5-year DFS was achieved following upfront LPS in patients with cT2 disease (57.0% vs. 36.4%, p=0.023) by virtue of better local control. Despite frequent cN2-3 disease in upfront LPS group, comparable outcomes were observed between upfront RT and LPS group. However, multivariable analyses revealed that performance status and double primary cancer diagnosed within 6 months of HPC diagnosis affected OS significantly, while treatment modality per se did not.
Conclusion
Although upfront LPS could provide better local control than upfront RT in patients with cT2 disease, overall outcomes were comparable following either modality. Treatment selection of larynx-preserving approach for HPC should be individualized based on tumor and patient factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • In Reply to Liu and Luo
    Kangpyo Kim, Yong Chan Ahn
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2024; 118(1): 308.     CrossRef
  • The role and clinical significance of microRNA-29a-3p in the development of hypopharyngeal carcinoma
    Tao Liu, Detao Ding, Wei Wang, Yungang Wu, Dengdian Ma, Miaomiao Liu, Ziqiao Tan, Jing Yao, Xiaoyu Li
    Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology.2023; 89(3): 401.     CrossRef
  • Survival and swallowing function outcome impact factors analysis of surgery-oriented comprehensive treatment for hypopharyngeal cancer in a series of 122 patients
    Wan-Xin Li, Yan-Bo Dong, Cheng Lu, Patrick J. Bradley, Liang-Fa Liu
    Ear, Nose & Throat Journal.2022; 101(8): 532.     CrossRef
  • 7,137 View
  • 163 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Lung Cancer
Prognostic Factor and Clinical Outcome in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Study Based on Real-World Clinical Data in the Korean Population
Ho Cheol Kim, Wonjun Ji, Jae Cheol Lee, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Si Yeol Song, Chang-Min Choi, Korean Association for Lung Cancer, Korea Central Cancer Registry
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(4):1033-1041.   Published online February 16, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1350
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The optimal treatment for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcome in stage III NSCLC using real-world clinical data in the Korean population.
Materials and Methods
Among 8,110 patients with lung cancer selected from 52 hospitals in Korea during 2014-2016, only patients with stage III NSCLC were recruited and analyzed. A standardized protocol was used to collect clinical information and cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for mortality.
Results
A total of 1,383 patients (46.5% had squamous cell carcinoma and 40.9% had adenocarcinoma) with stage III NSCLC were enrolled, and their median age was 70 years. Regarding clinical stage, 548 patients (39.6%) had stage IIIA, 517 (37.4%) had stage IIIB, and 318 (23.0%) had stage IIIC. Pertaining to the initial treatment method, the surgery group (median survival period: 36 months) showed better survival outcomes than the non-surgical treatment group (median survival period: 18 months, p=0.001) in patients with stage IIIA. Moreover, among patients with stage IIIB and stage IIIC, those who received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT, median survival period: 24 months) showed better survival outcomes than those who received chemotherapy (median survival period: 11 months), or radiation therapy (median survival period: 10 months, p<0.001).
Conclusion
While surgery might be feasible as the initial treatment option in patients with stage IIIA NSCLC, CCRT showed a beneficial role in patients with stage IIIB and IIIC NSCLC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Real‐world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stage III NSCLC in Korea: The KINDLE study
    Jiyun Lee, Hee Kyung Ahn, Sang‐We Kim, Ji‐Youn Han, Sung Sook Lee, Hyung Soon Park, Hyun Woo Lee, Joo‐Hang Kim, Eunhan Cho, Reto Huggenberger, Byoung Chul Cho
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Contribution of Enhanced Locoregional Control to Improved Overall Survival with Consolidative Durvalumab after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights from Real-World Data
    Jeong Yun Jang, Si Yeol Song, Young Seob Shin, Ha Un Kim, Eun Kyung Choi, Sang-We Kim, Jae Cheol Lee, Dae Ho Lee, Chang-Min Choi, Shinkyo Yoon, Su Ssan Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 785.     CrossRef
  • Glucose metabolic heterogeneity correlates with pathological features and improves survival stratification of resectable lung adenocarcinoma
    Yu-Hung Chen, Yen-Chang Chen, Kun-Han Lue, Sung-Chao Chu, Bee-Song Chang, Ling-Yi Wang, Ming-Hsun Li, Chih-Bin Lin
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine.2023; 37(2): 139.     CrossRef
  • The combined tumor-nodal glycolytic entropy improves survival stratification in nonsmall cell lung cancer with locoregional disease
    Yu-Hung Chen, Kun-Han Lue, Sung-Chao Chu, Bee-Song Chang, Chih-Bin Lin
    Nuclear Medicine Communications.2023; 44(1): 100.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of pretherapeutic FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer with pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis
    Yong-Jin Park, Yunjoo Im, O. Jung Kwon, Joungho Han, Myung-Ju Ahn, Jhingook Kim, Sang-Won Um, Joon Young Choi
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Comparative Study with Historical Control to Determine the Real-World Effectiveness of Durvalumab after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Cheol-Kyu Park, Nakyung Jeon, Hwa-Kyung Park, Hyung-Joo Oh, Young-Chul Kim, Ha-Lim Jeon, Yong-Hyub Kim, Sung-Ja Ahn, In-Jae Oh
    Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1606.     CrossRef
  • Association between clinical outcomes and local treatment in stage IV non‐small cell lung cancer patients with single extrathoracic metastasis
    Jeong Uk Lim, Hye Seon Kang, Ah Young Shin, Chang Dong Yeo, Chan Kwon Park, Sang Haak Lee, Seung Joon Kim
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(9): 1349.     CrossRef
  • Conversion therapy from unresectable stage IIIC non-small-cell lung cancer to radical surgery via anti-PD-1 immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis: A case report and literature review
    Guohua Jia, Shuimei Zhou, Tangpeng Xu, Yabing Huang, Xiangpan Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A phase II, multicenter study of lazertinib as consolidation therapy in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (stage III) who have not progressed following definitive, platinum‐based, chemoradiatio
    Juwhan Choi, Jeong Eun Lee, Chang‐Min Choi, In‐Jae Oh, Kye Young Lee, Tae Won Jang, Seung Hyeun Lee, Eun Young Kim, Dong Won Park, Sun Hyo Park, Sung Yong Lee
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(23): 3431.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Combing Primary Tumor and Nodal Glycolytic–Volumetric Parameters of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Regional Lymph Node Metastasis
    Yu-Hung Chen, Sung-Chao Chu, Ling-Yi Wang, Tso-Fu Wang, Kun-Han Lue, Chih-Bin Lin, Bee-Song Chang, Dai-Wei Liu, Shu-Hsin Liu, Sheng-Chieh Chan
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(6): 1065.     CrossRef
  • 7,789 View
  • 217 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Gynecologic cancer
Nationwide Comparison of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Kyung-Jin Eoh, Eun-Ji Nam, Sang-Wun Kim, Minkyung Shin, Stella J-H Kim, Jung-Ae Kim, Yong-Tae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(2):549-557.   Published online October 22, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.802
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Population-based comparisons between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (robotic surgery [RS] and laparoscopic surgery [LS]) and open surgery (OS) for managing endometrial cancer are lacking. This study aimed to compare surgical and oncologic outcomes between endometrial cancer patients who underwent surgical staging via MIS or OS.
Materials and Methods
A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed using claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance database from January 2012 to December 2016. All patients who underwent hysterectomy under diagnosis of endometrial cancer were identified. Patients were classified into RS, LS, and OS groups. Operative and oncologic outcomes were compared among the three groups after adjustments for age group, risk group (adjuvant therapy status), modified Charlson comorbidity index, income level, insurance type, and index year using propensity scores obtained via the inverse probability of treatment weighted method.
Results
After adjustment, 5,065 patients (RS, n=315; LS, n=3,248; OS, n=1,503) were analyzed. Patient demographics were comparable. Hospital stay, postoperative complications, and cost were more favorable in the RS and LS groups than in the OS group (all p < 0.001). Five-year overall survival was significantly longer in the RS and LS groups than in the OS group (94.8%, 91.9%, and 86.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, the survival benefit of RS was shown in the subgroup analysis of low-risk endometrial cancer patients.
Conclusion
Our study provides further evidence for the RS being a safe surgical alternative to the LS and OS, especially in low-risk endometrial cancer patients, offering surgical and oncologic outcomes equivalent to other surgical approaches.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Robot-assisted pelvic and renal surgery compared with laparoscopic or open surgery: Literature review of cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes
    Thomas Davidson, Rune Sjödahl, Åke Aldman, Claes Lennmarken, Ann-Sofi Kammerlind, Elvar Theodorsson
    Scandinavian Journal of Surgery.2024; 113(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Progress of Research on the Application of Robotic Surgical System in Gynecologic Malignancies
    璐 余
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(03): 327.     CrossRef
  • Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of endometrial cancer cases in Puerto Rico during the period 2009 to 2015: A retrospective study
    Yisel Pagán Santana, Maira Castañeda Ávila, Ruth Ríos Motta, Karen J. Ortiz Ortiz, Asmerom Tesfamariam Sengal
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(5): e0302253.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Robotic Single-Site vs. Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery
    Heeju Kang, Hyewon Chung, Seungmee Lee, Tae-Kyu Jang, So-Jin Shin, Sang-Hoon Kwon, Chi-Heum Cho
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(6): 601.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Robotic Assistance on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis
    Kelly Lamiman, Michael Silver, Nicole Goncalves, Michael Kim, Ioannis Alagkiozidis
    Cancers.2024; 16(14): 2584.     CrossRef
  • Surgical staging in Early Endometrial Cancer without intrauterine manipulator Using the da Vinci SP Robotic System
    Eun Bi Jang, Yong-hee Park, Kyeong A. So, Sun Joo Lee, Tae Jin Kim, Seung-Hyuk Shim
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2024; : 101615.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Relevance of Uterine Manipulation on Oncologic Outcome in Robot-Assisted versus Open Surgery in the Management of Endometrial Cancer
    Kyung Jin Eoh, Yoo-Na Kim, Eun Ji Nam, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(5): 1950.     CrossRef
  • Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan
    Hiroshi Yoshida, Hiroko Machida, Koji Matsuo, Yoshito Terai, Takuma Fujii, Masaki Mandai, Kei Kawana, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Mikio Mikami, Satoru Nagase
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Relevance of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience from Korea
    Kyung-Jin Eoh, Tae-Kyung Lee, Eun-Ji Nam, Sang-Wun Kim, Young-Tae Kim
    Cancers.2023; 15(15): 3984.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Surgery in the Treatment of Gynecological Carcinoma and Malignancies: Introduction to the da Vinci Robotic Surgery System
    Arnav Goel, Soumya Pamnani, Ashish Anjankar
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes
    Kyung Jin Eoh, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Yeol Park, Hee Seung Kim, Jiheum Paek, Young Tae Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Single-Port Laparoscopy with Other Surgical Approaches in Endometrial Cancer Surgical Staging: Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis
    Sang Hyun Cho, Jung-Yun Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Sunghoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Sang Wun Kim
    Cancers.2023; 15(22): 5322.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Outcome of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Women with Diabetes: Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample
    Huang-Pin Shen, Chih-Jen Tseng
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(24): 7713.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic vs. open procedure for intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer: a minimum 4-year follow-up analysis
    Xing Zhou, Sitian Wei, Qingchun Shao, Jun Zhang, Rong Zhao, Rui Shi, Wei Zhang, Kejun Dong, Wan Shu, Hongbo Wang
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery for women with apparent early‐stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi‐institutional retrospective cohort study
    Yu Xu, Juan Shen, Qianwen Zhang, Yuedong He, Cheng Chen, Yong Tian
    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2022; 158(1): 162.     CrossRef
  • Impact of lymphadenectomy on short- and long-term complications in patients with endometrial cancer
    Louisa Proppe, Ibrahim Alkatout, Ricarda Koch, Sascha Baum, Christos Kotanidis, Achim Rody, Lars C. Hanker, Georgios Gitas
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(3): 811.     CrossRef
  • Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
    Pluvio J. Coronado, Agnieszka Rychlik, Laura Baquedano, Virginia García-Pineda, Maria A. Martínez-Maestre, Denis Querleu, Ignacio Zapardiel
    Cancers.2022; 14(4): 1081.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer
    Peter A. Argenta, Jordan Mattson, Colleen L. Rivard, Elizabeth Luther, Alexandra Schefter, Rachel I. Vogel
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 165(2): 347.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Quantitative Nursing Combined with Psychological Intervention in Operating Room on Stress Response, Psychological State, and Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Endometrial Cancer Surgery
    Xiaojing Chen, Huiyan Li, Shouyan Wang, Yu Wang, Li Zhang, Dandan Yao, Li Li, Ge Gao, Shakeel Ahmad
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Increased HSF1 Promotes Infiltration and Metastasis in Cervical Cancer via Enhancing MTDH-VEGF-C Expression
    Xueyan Shi, Zhenghao Deng, Shouman Wang, Shuai Zhao, Lan Xiao, Jiang Zou, Tao Li, Sichuang Tan, SipAin Tan, Xianzhong Xiao
    OncoTargets and Therapy.2021; Volume 14: 1305.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review
    Khadija Alshowaikh, Katarzyna Karpinska-Leydier, Jashvini Amirthalingam , Gokul Paidi, Anuruddhika I Iroshani Jayarathna, Divya Bala Anthony Manisha R Salibindla, Huseyin Ekin Ergin
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in endometrial cancer:comparison with laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy
    Yoshitsugu Chigusa, Sae Yu, Naoki Horikawa, Haruko Okamoto, Masumi Sunada, Ukita Masayo, Koji Yamanoi, Ken Yamaguchi, Akihito Horie, Masaki Mandai
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY.2021; 37(2): 10.     CrossRef
  • 7,389 View
  • 221 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 22 Crossref
Close layer
Gastrointestinal cancer
Tumor Control and Overall Survival after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Hoon Sik Choi, Bae Kwon Jeong, Ki Mun Kang, Hojin Jeong, Jin Ho Song, In Bong Ha, Oh-Young Kwon
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):1188-1198.   Published online July 21, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.402
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
In pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (POM-CRC), the primarily recommended local therapy is metastasectomy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is another local therapy modality that is considered as an alternative option in patients who cannot undergo surgery. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to demonstrate the effects of SBRT on POM-CRC by integrating the relevant studies.
Materials and Methods
The authors explored MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS, and selected studies including patients treated with SBRT for POM-CRC and availability of local control (LC) or overall survival (OS) rate. In this meta-analysis, the effect of SBRT was presented in the form of the LC and OS rates for 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after SBRT as pooled estimates, and the frequency of pulmonary toxicity of grade 3 or higher after SBRT (PTG3-SBRT).
Results
Fourteen full texts among the searched 4,984 studies were the objects of this meta-analysis. The overall number of POM-CRC patients was 495 as per the integration of 14 studies. The pooled estimate LC rate at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after SBRT was 81.0%, 71.5%, 56.0%, and 61.8%, and the OS rate was 86.9%, 70.1%, 57.9%, and 43.0%, respectively. The LC and OS rates gradually declined until 3 years after SBRT in a similar pattern. Among the 14 studies, only two studies reported PTG3-SBRT as 2.2% and 10.8%, respectively.
Conclusion
For POM-CRC, SBRT is an ablative therapy with a benefit on LC and OS rates and less adverse effects on the lung.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study
    Myrtle F. Krul, Jan M. van Rees, Amihan M. de Boer, Karlijn K. Neve, Cornelis Verhoef, Koert F.D. Kuhlmann, Tarik R. Baetens, Tineke E. Buffart, Joost L. Knegjens, Houke M. Klomp, Theo J.M. Ruers, Marianne de Vries, Joost Rothbarth, Esther van Meerten, Jo
    Digestive Diseases.2024; 42(6): 538.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and lung toxicities after lung SABR using dynamic conformal arc therapy: a single-institution cohort study
    Emmanuel Mesny, Myriam Ayadi, Pauline Dupuis, Guillaume Beldjoudi, Ronan Tanguy, Isabelle Martel-Lafay
    Radiation Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Knowing When to Use Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Cancer
    Davide Franceschini, Maria Ausilia Teriaca, Luca Dominici, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 7009.     CrossRef
  • 8,244 View
  • 158 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Korea: Nationwide Data from 2013 to 2018
Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(3):938-944.   Published online April 6, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.043
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We report nationwide data on the current status of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Korea.
Materials and Methods
Nationwide data of patients who underwent surgery for CRC from 2013 to 2018 were obtained from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. Data and trends of laparoscopy use for colorectal resection over six years were examined.
Results
In Korea, a total of 117,320 patients underwent surgical resection for CRC from 2013 to 2018. The proportion of laparoscopic resection increased from 64.9% in 2013 to 78.5% in 2018. The rate of laparoscopic resection for colon cancer increased from 64.7% in 2013 to 77.4% in 2018. For rectal cancer, the rate of laparoscopic resection increased from 65.4% to 81.6%. Males accounted for 59.8% of all patients, but females surpassed males at over 80 years of age. The age of peak incidence was in the 60s for males and in the 70s for females. A steady increase in the number of patients undergoing surgery for CRC was observed over 80 years of age.
Conclusion
The laparoscopic penetration rate for CRC in Korea continued to increase annually and reached 78.5% in 2018.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Learning curve for single-port robot-assisted colectomy
    Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Sung Chul Lee, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jungwook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Clinical effect of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer based on propensity score matching
    Yang Liu, Xian-Xue Wang, Yu-Lin Li, Wen-Tao He, Hong Li, Hua Chen
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(1): 124.     CrossRef
  • The impact of surgical volume on outcomes in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients receiving definitive surgeries
    Chiu-Mei Yeh, Tzu-Yu Lai, Yu-Wen Hu, Chung-Jen Teng, Nicole Huang, Chia-Jen Liu
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer
    Min Soo Cho, Hyeon Woo Bae, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 384.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis
    Eun Ji Park, Gyong Tae Noh, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 594.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of incisional hernia after major colorectal cancer surgery & analysis of associated risk factors in Asian population: Is laparoscopy any better?
    Shao Nan Khor, S.H.X. Cheok, Rehena Sultana, Emile Kwong Wei Tan
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • Intracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy – is it time for wider uptake?
    Kim‐Chi Phan‐Thien, Edward A. Cooper, David Z. Lubowski
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(3): 454.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu Zhong, Chuanyuan Liu, Chuanfa Fang, Lei Zhang, Xianping He, Weiquan Zhu, Xueyun Guan
    Medicine.2023; 102(24): e34057.     CrossRef
  • Results of Laparoscopic Surgery and D3 Lymph Node Dissection Combined With Chemotherapy for the Radical Treatment of Advanced-Stage Right Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Observational Study in Vietnam
    Long Huynh Thanh, Khiem Nguyen Manh, Minh Nguyen Thi, Anh Nguyen Tri Trung, Kien Nguyen Trung, Thang Le Viet, Nung Vu Huy
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Learning curve of single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (SILTEP) for inguinal hernia
    Y. Y. Park, K. Lee, S. T. Oh, J. Lee
    Hernia.2022; 26(3): 959.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer in the Treatment of Elderly Colorectal Cancer and Its Effect on Gastrointestinal Function
    Biao Liu, Chuanhui Yao, Haiying Li
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Learning curve for single-port robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery
    Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Chang Kyu Oh, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(3): 159.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer
    Long-Hai He, Bo Yang, Xiao-Qin Su, Yue Zhou, Zhen Zhang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(13): 4042.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors and economic burden of postoperative anastomotic leakage related events in patients who underwent surgeries for colorectal cancer
    Jeonghyun Kang, Hyesung Kim, HyeJin Park, Bora Lee, Kang Young Lee, Alberto Meyer
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(5): e0267950.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Contemporary Practice, Evidence, and Knowledge Gaps
    Jacob Ghotbi, Mushegh Sahakyan, Kjetil Søreide, Åsmund Avdem Fretland, Bård Røsok, Tore Tholfsen, Anne Waage, Bjørn Edwin, Knut Jørgen Labori, Sheraz Yaqub, Dyre Kleive
    Oncology and Therapy.2022; 10(2): 301.     CrossRef
  • A retrospective study of post-operative complications and cost analysis in robotic rectal resection versus laparoscopic rectal resection
    Muhammad Ali, Xiaodong Zhu, Yang Wang, Jianyue Ding, Qi Zhang, Qiannan Sun, Shantanu Baral, Daorong Wang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of colorectal cancer
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 549.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 231.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative complications observed with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer
    Chengkui Liu, Xiaoqing Li, Qingfeng Wang
    Medicine.2021; 100(36): e27158.     CrossRef
  • Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing Using a Direct Injection Method with Indocyanine Green for Localization of Colorectal Tumors: An Efficacy and Safety Comparison Study
    Young Jin Kim, Ji Won Park, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon-Hye Kwon, Min Jung Kim, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2020; 23(4): 186.     CrossRef
  • 7,678 View
  • 174 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
Close layer
Displacement of Surgical Clips in Patients with Human Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Excision Cavity during Whole Breast Irradiation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
Wonguen Jung, Kyubo Kim, Nam Sun Paik
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):388-395.   Published online August 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.213
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the displacement of surgical clips in the excision cavity during whole breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without acellular dermal matrix (ADM) insertion, and to analyze clinicopathologic factors associated with the displacement of surgical clips.
Materials and Methods
From 2016 to 2017, 100 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent BCS with the placement of surgical clips (superior, inferior, medial, lateral, and deep sides) in the tumor bed were included in this study. All patients took first planning computed tomography (CT) scan (CT 1) before whole breast irradiation and second CT scan (CT 2) before boost irradiation. Between two sets of planning CT, the displacement of surgical clips was calculated from the ΔX (lateral–medial), ΔY (anterior–posterior), ΔZ (superior–inferior), and three-dimensional (3D) directions. Patients were divided into two groups according to the breast volume replacement with ADM: group A with ADM and group B without ADM.
Results
The means and 1 standard deviations of 3D displacement for superior, inferior, medial, lateral and deep clips were 5.2±2.9, 5.2±3.2, 5.6±4.5, 5.6±4.3, and 4.9±4.9 mm in entire cohort (n=100); 5.6±2.6, 6.0±3.5, 6.7±5.8, 6.7±5.7, and 6.1±7.4 mm in group A (n=38); 4.9±3.1, 4.8±3.0, 5.0±3.5, 5.0±2.9, and 4.3±2.8 mm in group B (n=62), respectively. The 3D displacements of group A were longer than those of group B, but only significant difference was observed in lateral clip (p=0.047).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated displacement of surgical clips during whole breast irradiation in patients with ADM insertion. For patients who had breast volume replacement using ADM, adaptive boost planning should be considered.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without surgical clips: a pilot study on preoperative magnetic resonance simulation
    Shuning Jiao, Yiqing Wang, Jiabin Ma, Jing Shen, Xi-Qian Zhang, Bing Zhou, Xiansong Sun, Haoran Xu, Xia Liu, Ke Hu, Fuquan Zhang, Xiaorong Hou, Jie Qiu
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What Should We Know in Postoperative Surveillance Imaging After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery with Pellet-Type Acellular Dermal Matrix?
    Yeong Yi An, Hyejung Hwang, Young Jin Suh
    Academic Radiology.2023; 30: S16.     CrossRef
  • Imaging surveillance for the detection of ipsilateral local tumor recurrence in patients who underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with acellular dermal matrix: abbreviated MRI versus conventional mammography and ultrasonography
    Mi Young Kim, Young Jin Suh, Yeong Yi An
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5,798 View
  • 175 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
SUVmax Predicts Disease Progression after Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Yoo-Kang Kwak, Hee Hyun Park, Kyu Hye Choi, Eun Young Park, Soo Yoon Sung, Sea-Won Lee, Ji Hyun Hong, Hyo Chun Lee, Ie Ryung Yoo, Yeon Sil Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(1):85-97.   Published online May 17, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.007
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) is gaining evidence as a predictive factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment in early-stage NSCLC when a patient is unsuitable for surgery. We performed a study to assess the prognostic clinical significance of PET-CT after SABR in early-stage NSCLC.
Materials and Methods
Seventy-six patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SABR were investigated. Total radiation dose ranged from 36 to 63 Gy in three to eight fractions depending on tumor location and size. Respiratory motion control was implemented at simulation and during treatment. PET-CT prior to SABR was performed in 66 patients (86.8%).
Results
Median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 5 to 142 months). Local control rate at 1, 2, and 5 years were 95.9%, 92.8%, and 86.7%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 5 years were 91.0%, 71.3%, and 52.1% respectively. Cause-specific survival at 1, 2, and 5 years were 98.6%, 93.1%, and 84.3% respectively. Tumor size and pre-SABR maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) demonstrated statistical significance in the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank test. In multivariate analyses pre-SABR SUVmax remained statistically significant in correlation to OS (p=0.024; hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 8.8) and with marginal significance in regards to regional progression-free survival (p=0.059; HR, 32.5; 95% CI, 2.6 to 402.5).
Conclusion
Pre-SABR SUVmax demonstrated a predictive power in statistical analyses. Tumors with SUVmax above 6 at diagnosis were associated with inferior outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Enhanced NSCLC subtyping and staging through attention-augmented multi-task deep learning: A novel diagnostic tool
    Runhuang Yang, Weiming Li, Siqi Yu, Zhiyuan Wu, Haiping Zhang, Xiangtong Liu, Lixin Tao, Xia Li, Jian Huang, Xiuhua Guo
    International Journal of Medical Informatics.2025; 193: 105694.     CrossRef
  • Invasive Nodal Staging via Endobronchial Ultrasound and Outcome in Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer – Results from a Single Institution Study
    Benjamin George, Atallah Baydoun, Samar Bhat, Lauryn Bailey, Theodore Arsenault, Yilun Sun, Yuxia Zhang, Yiran Zheng, Prashant Vempati, Tarun Podder, Tithi Biswas
    Clinical Lung Cancer.2024; 25(4): e181.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio on computed tomography in NSCLC: a meta-analysis
    Yongming Wu, Wenpeng Song, Denian Wang, Junke Chang, Yan Wang, Jie Tian, Sicheng Zhou, Yingxian Dong, Jing Zhou, Jue Li, Ziyi Zhao, Guowei Che
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tumor to liver maximum standardized uptake value ratio of FDG-PET/CT parameters predicts tumor treatment response and survival of stage III non-small cell lung cancer
    Pengfei Zhang, Wei Chen, Kewei Zhao, Xiaowen Qiu, Tao Li, Xingzhuang Zhu, Peng Sun, Chunsheng Wang, Yipeng Song
    BMC Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
    Jixia Han, Qi Song, Feng Guo, Rui Du, Henghu Fang, Jingbo Kang, Zejun Lu
    Nuclear Medicine Communications.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessing tumor angiogenesis using dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance-positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
    Yu-Sen Huang, Jenny Ling-Yu Chen, Hsin-Ming Chen, Li-Hao Yeh, Jin-Yuan Shih, Ruoh-Fang Yen, Yeun-Chung Chang
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Potential role of functional imaging in predicting outcome for patients treated with carbon ion therapy: a review
    Giulia Riva, Sara Imparato, Giovanni Savietto, Mattia Pecorilla, Alberto Iannalfi, Amelia Barcellini, Sara Ronchi, Maria Rosaria Fiore, Chiara Paganelli, Giulia Buizza, Mario Ciocca, Guido Baroni, Lorenzo Preda, Ester Orlandi
    The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of metabolic signature on 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy
    Jin Meng, Emmanuel Deshayes, Li Zhang, Wei Shi, Xiaomeng Zhang, Xingxing Chen, Xin Mei, Jinli Ma, Yizhou Jiang, Jiong Wu, Zhimin Shao, Xiaoli Yu, Zhaozhi Yang, Xiaomao Guo
    Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics.2021; 23: 412.     CrossRef
  • Parámetros cuantitativos de la PET/TC con 18F-FDG como factores pronósticos en el cáncer de pulmón localizado e inoperable
    J.R. Infante, J. Cabrera, J.I. Rayo, C. Cruz, J. Serrano, M. Moreno, A. Martínez, P. Jiménez, A. Cobo
    Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular.2020; 39(6): 353.     CrossRef
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT quantitative parameters as prognostic factors in localized and inoperable lung cancer
    J.R. Infante, J. Cabrera, J.I. Rayo, C. Cruz, J. Serrano, M Moreno, A. Martínez, P. Jiménez, A. Cobo
    Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (English Edition).2020; 39(6): 353.     CrossRef
  • 7,232 View
  • 133 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Impact of 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Chemotherapy Decision in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast with Nodal Micrometastases
Wei-Rong Chen, Jia-Peng Deng, Jun Wang, Jia-Yuan Sun, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1437-1448.   Published online March 4, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.611
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on predicting prognosis and chemotherapy decision in node micrometastases (N1mi) breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
Methods
Patients with stage T1-2N1mi and estrogen receptor-positive IDC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were included. The associations of 21-gene RS with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), chemotherapy decision, and benefit of chemotherapy were analyzed.
Results
We identified 4,758 patients including 1,403 patients (29.5%) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In the traditional RS cutoffs, 2,831 (59.5%), 1,634 (34.3%), and 293 (6.2%) patients were in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS groups, respectively. In 3,853 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status available, most patients were HER2-negative disease (98.3%). A higher RS was independently related to chemotherapy receipt, and 14.0%, 47.7%, and 77.8% of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS groups received chemotherapy, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated that a higher RS was related to worse BCSS (p < 0.001). The 5-year BCSS rates were 99.3%, 97.4%, and 91.9% in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). However, chemotherapy receipt did not correlate with better BCSS in low-, intermediate-, or high-risk RS groups. There were similar trends using Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment RS cutoffs.
Conclusion
The 21-gene RS does predict outcome and impact on chemotherapy decision of N1mi breast IDC. Large cohort and long-term outcomes studies are needed to identify the effects of chemotherapy in N1mi patients by different 21-gene RS groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • 21-gene recurrence score predictive of the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for elderly patients with T1N0 and luminal breast cancer
    Run-Jie Wang, Hai-Ying Liu, Lin-Feng Guo, De Yu, San-Gang Wu
    Breast Cancer.2024; 31(6): 1156.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of adjuvant therapy for T1-2N1miM0 breast cancer without further axillary lymph node dissection
    Baiyu Li, Jianbo Liu, Guangyin Wu, Qingyao Zhu, Shundong Cang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of post-mastectomy adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with prognostic stage IB breast cancer: A SEER-based study
    HongMei Wang, Yi Peng, Jianbin Wu, ZhuangWei Chen, HuaLe Zhang
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(9): 3634.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 21-gene assay and St.Gallen International Expert Consensus in the treatment decision for patients with early invasive breast cancers
    Ming Luo, Fu Li, Ka Su, Huiming Yuan, Jian Zeng
    Cancer Biology & Therapy.2020; 21(2): 108.     CrossRef
  • Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score®: A Review of its Use in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Yahiya Y. Syed
    Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.2020; 24(5): 621.     CrossRef
  • 6,684 View
  • 138 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Changes of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes after Core Needle Biopsy and the Prognostic Implications in Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study
Jiahui Huang, Xiaosong Chen, Xiaochun Fei, Ou Huang, Jiayi Wu, Li Zhu, Jianrong He, Weiguo Chen, Yafen Li, Kunwei Shen
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1336-1346.   Published online February 12, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.504
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgery removed sample (SRS) in early stage breast cancer patients and to identify the correlating factors and prognostic significance of TILs changes.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was carried out on 255 patients who received CNB and underwent surgical resection for invasive breast cancer. Stromal TILs levels of CNB and SRS were evaluated respectively. Tumors with ≥50% stromal TILs were defined as lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC). Clinicopathological variables were analyzed to determine whether there were factors associated with TILs changes. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the influences of TILs and TILs changes on survival.
Results
SRS-TILs (median, 10.0%) were significant higher than CNB-TILs (median, 5.0%; p<0.001). Younger age (<60 years, p=0.016) and long surgery time interval (STI, ≥4 days; p=0.003) were independent factors correlating with higher TILs changes. CNB-LPBC patients showed better breast cancer-free interval (BCFI, p=0.021) than CNB-non-LPBC (CNB-nLPBC) patients. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the LPBC change pattern from CNB to SRS: LPBC→LPBC, LPBC→nLPBC, nLPBC→LPBC, and nLPBC→nLPBC, with estimated 5-year BCFI 100%, 100%, 69.7%, and 86.0% (p=0.016). nLPBC→LPBC pattern was an independent prognostic factor of worse BCFI (hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 4.53; p=0.035) compared with other patterns.
Conclusion
TILs were significantly higher in SRS than in CNB. Higher TILs changes were associated with younger age and long STI. Changing from nLPBC to LPBC after CNB indicated a worse BCFI, which needs further validation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A nomogram to predict the pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer based on the TILs-US score
    Hideo Shigematsu, Kayo Fukui, Akiko Kanou, Mutsumi Fujimoto, Kanako Suzuki, Haruka Ikejiri, Ai Amioka, Emiko Hiraoka, Shinsuke Sasada, Akiko Emi, Koji Arihiro, Morihito Okada
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 54(9): 967.     CrossRef
  • Biomarker development for PD-(L)1 axis inhibition: a consensus view from the SITC Biomarkers Committee
    Anne Monette, Sarah Warren, J Carl Barrett, Charlie Garnett-Benson, Kurt A Schalper, Janis M Taube, Brian Topp, Alexandra Snyder
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.2024; 12(7): e009427.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic performance of TILs–US score and LPBC in biopsy specimens for predicting pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer
    Hideo Shigematsu, Kayo Fukui, Akiko Kanou, Erika Yokoyama, Makiko Tanaka, Mutsumi Fujimoto, Kanako Suzuki, Haruka Ikejiri, Ai Amioka, Emiko Hiraoka, Shinsuke Sasada, Akiko Emi, Tetsuya Nakagiri, Koji Arihiro, Morihito Okada
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 29(12): 1860.     CrossRef
  • Stromal grading predicts pathologic complete response and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer
    Sean M. Hacking, Yihong Wang
    Virchows Archiv.2023; 483(6): 765.     CrossRef
  • Whole slide image features predict pathologic complete response and poor clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer
    Sean M. Hacking, Julie Karam, Kamaljeet Singh, Ece D. Gamsiz Uzun, Arlen Brickman, Evgeny Yakirevich, Ross Taliano, Yihong Wang
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2023; 246: 154476.     CrossRef
  • Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and radiological picture of the tumor
    Karolina Frankowska, Michał Zarobkiewicz, Izabela Dąbrowska, Agnieszka Bojarska-Junak
    Medical Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Core needle biopsies alter the amounts of CCR5, Siglec-15, and PD-L1 positivities in breast carcinoma
    Minna Mutka, Kristiina Joensuu, Marja Heiskala, Mine Eray, Päivi Heikkilä
    Virchows Archiv.2023; 483(2): 215.     CrossRef
  • Clinical characteristics, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes, and prognosis in HER2‐low breast cancer: A comparison study with HER2‐zero and HER2‐positive disease
    Yujie Lu, Yiwei Tong, Xiaochun Fei, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(15): 16264.     CrossRef
  • Time interval between breast cancer diagnosis and surgery is associated with disease outcome
    Siji Zhu, Shuai Li, Jiahui Huang, Xiaochun Fei, Kunwei Shen, Xiaosong Chen
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and mammographic density as predictors of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer
    Amalia H. Landén, Kian Chin, Anikó Kovács, Erik Holmberg, Eva Molnar, Axel Stenmark Tullberg, Fredrik Wärnberg, Per Karlsson
    Acta Oncologica.2023; 62(12): 1862.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with a High and Low Expression of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes: A Stratified Analysis According to Molecular Subtypes
    Jiejie Zhou, Yi Jin, Haiwei Miao, Shanshan Lu, Xinmiao Liu, Yun He, Huiru Liu, Youfan Zhao, Yang Zhang, Yan-Lin Liu, Zhifang Pan, Jeon-Hor Chen, Meihao Wang, Min-Ying Su
    Cancers.2023; 15(23): 5672.     CrossRef
  • Histopathological Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) as Predictive Biomarker for Hormone Receptors Status, Proliferative Activity and Clinical Outcome in Her-2 Positive Breast Cancer
    Giuseppe Angelico, Giuseppe Broggi, Rosario Caltabiano, Angela Santoro, Saveria Spadola, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Giulia Scaglione, Michele Valente, Damiano Arciuolo, Alejandro Martin Sanchez, Gianluca Franceschini, Riccardo Masetti, Antonino Mulè, Gian F
    Applied Sciences.2021; 11(15): 6788.     CrossRef
  • Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer
    Zuzana Kos, Elvire Roblin, Rim S. Kim, Stefan Michiels, Brandon D. Gallas, Weijie Chen, Koen K. van de Vijver, Shom Goel, Sylvia Adams, Sandra Demaria, Giuseppe Viale, Torsten O. Nielsen, Sunil S. Badve, W. Fraser Symmans, Christos Sotiriou, David L. Rimm
    npj Breast Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) Be a Predictive Factor for Lymph Nodes Status in Both Early Stage and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer?
    Alexandra Caziuc, Diana Schlanger, Giorgiana Amarinei, George Calin Dindelegan
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(4): 545.     CrossRef
  • 7,058 View
  • 212 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
The Feasibility of Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spinal Metastasis with Epidural Cord Compression
Yi-Jun Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Kyubo Kim, Hak Jae Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Kyung Hwan Shin, Hong-Gyun Wu, Il Han Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1324-1335.   Published online January 29, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.653
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating spinal metastasis with epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC).
Materials and Methods
During 2013-2016, 149 regions of spinal metastasis in 105 patients treated with singlefraction (12-24 Gy) spinal SRS were reviewed. Cord compression of Bilsky grade 2 (with visible cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) or 3 (no visible CSF) was defined as ESCC. Local progression (LP) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rates after SRS were evaluated using multivariate competing-risk regression analysis.
Results
The 1-year cumulative incidences of LP for Bilsky grades 0 (n=80), 1 (n=39), 2 (n=21), and 3 (n=9) were 3.0%, 8.4%, 0%, and 24.9%, respectively. Bilsky grade 2 ESCC did not significantly increase the LP rate (no LP for grade 2). The 1-year cumulative incidences of VCF for Bilsky grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 6.6%, 5.2%, 17.1%, and 12.1%, respectively. ESCC may increase VCF risk (subhazard ratio [SHR] for grade 2, 5.368; p=0.035; SHR for grade 3, 2.215; p=0.460). Complete or partial pain response rates after SRS were 79%, 78%, 53%, and 63% for Bilsky grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.008). No neurotoxicity of grade ≥ 3 was observed.
Conclusion
Spinal SRS for spinal metastasis with Bilsky grade 2 ESCC did not increase the LP rate, was not associated with severe neurotoxicity, and showed moderate VCF and pain response rates. Bilsky grade 3 had a high LP rate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline
    R.S. Guninski, F. Cuccia, F. Alongi, N. Andratschke, C. Belka, D. Bellut, M. Dahele, M. Josipovic, T.E. Kroese, P. Mancosu, G. Minniti, M. Niyazi, U Ricardi, P. Munck af Rosenschold, A. Sahgal, Y. Tsang, W.F.A.R. Verbakel, M. Guckenberger
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2024; 190: 109969.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Spinal Lesion with Minimal Epidural Compression: Surgical Treatment or Stereotactic Radiotherapy?
    O. I. Kit, D. E. Zakondyrin, A. A. Grin, E. E. Rostorguev, Y. V. Przhedetskiy, P. G. Sakun, V. I. Voshedskii, B. V. Matevosian, T. S. Shepelya
    Creative surgery and oncology.2024; 14(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Interventions Following Radiotherapy in Spinal Metastases with Intermediate Instability: A Risk Factor Analysis: The Korean Society of Spinal Tumor Multicenter Study (KSST 2022-02)
    Se-Jun Park, Jin Ho Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Woong Sub Koom, Hwa Kyung Byun, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Dong-Ho Kang
    Cancers.2024; 16(14): 2554.     CrossRef
  • Development of a novel 12-point grading system for evaluating epidural spinal cord compression and its clinical implications
    Xuyong Cao, Weihao Jiang, Xiongwei Zhao, Haikuan Yu, Mingxing Lei, Yuncen Cao, Xiuyun Su, Yaosheng Liu
    The Spine Journal.2023; 23(12): 1858.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Total En Bloc Spondylectomy versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Single Spinal Metastasis
    Dong-Ho Kang, Wooseok Lee, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim, Sam Yeol Chang, Seong Hwa Hong, Jin Ho Kim, Hee Jung Son
    Cancers.2023; 15(23): 5518.     CrossRef
  • Radiomic modeling to predict risk of vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases
    Chengcheng Gui, Xuguang Chen, Khadija Sheikh, Liza Mathews, Sheng-Fu L. Lo, Junghoon Lee, Majid A. Khan, Daniel M. Sciubba, Kristin J. Redmond
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(2): 294.     CrossRef
  • Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review
    Lanlan Guo, Lixin Ke, Ziyi Zeng, Chuanping Yuan, Ziwei Wu, Lei Chen, Lixia Lu
    Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment of Metastatic Spinal Disease; what the Radiologist needs to know
    Stephen Supple, Shahjehan Ahmad, Santhosh Gaddikeri, Miral D. Jhaveri
    The British Journal of Radiology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions
    Daniel M. Sciubba, Zach Pennington, Matthew W. Colman, C. Rory Goodwin, Ilya Laufer, Joshua C. Patt, Kristin J. Redmond, Philip Saylor, John H. Shin, Joseph H. Schwab, Andrew J. Schoenfeld
    The Spine Journal.2021; 21(9): 1414.     CrossRef
  • An updated algorithm for the treatment of spinal metastasis
    Kawngwoo Park, Seong Son, Sang Gu Lee, En Kyung Cho, Hee Kyung Ahn, In Keun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Young Saing Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.2021; 17(2): 70.     CrossRef
  • Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review
    Giuseppe Di Perna, Fabio Cofano, Cristina Mantovani, Serena Badellino, Nicola Marengo, Marco Ajello, Ludovico Maria Comite, Giuseppe Palmieri, Fulvio Tartara, Francesco Zenga, Umberto Ricardi, Diego Garbossa
    Journal of Bone Oncology.2020; 25: 100320.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary management of metastatic spine disease: initial symptom-directed management
    Jeremy M Steinberger, Frank Yuk, Amish H Doshi, Sheryl Green, Isabelle M Germano
    Neuro-Oncology Practice.2020; 7(Supplement): i33.     CrossRef
  • 9,776 View
  • 232 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
High-Dose Thoracic Re-irradiation of Lung Cancer Using Highly Conformal Radiotherapy Is Effective with Acceptable Toxicity
Ji Hyun Hong, Yeon-Sil Kim, Sea-Won Lee, So Jung Lee, Jin Hyung Kang, Suk Hee Hong, Ju-Young Hong, GeumSeong Cheon
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1156-1166.   Published online November 29, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.472
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Thoracic re-irradiation (re-RT) of lung cancer has been challenged by the tolerance doses of normal tissues. We retrospectively analyzed local control, overall survival (OS) and toxicity after thoracic re-RT using highly conformal radiotherapy, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-one patients who received high-dose thoracic re-RT were analyzed. Doses were recalculated to determine biologically equivalent doses. The median interval to re-RT was 15.1 months (range, 4.4 to 56.3 months), the median initial dose was 79.2 Gy10 (range, 51.75 to 150 Gy10), and the median re-RT dose was 68.8 Gy10 (range, 43.2 to 132 Gy10).
Results
Eighteen (58.1%) and eleven (35.5%) patients showed loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively, after 17.4 months of median follow-up. The 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 60.2% and 43.7%, respectively. The median loco-regional recurrence-free-survival (LRFS) was 15.4 months, and the median OS was 20.4 months. The cumulative and re-RT biologically equivalent dose for α/β=10 (BED10) doses were the most significant prognostic factors. Cumulative BED10 ≥145 Gy10 and re-RT BED10≥68.7 Gy10 were significantly associated with longer OS (p=0.029 and p=0.012, respectively) and LRFS (p=0.003 and p=0.000, respectively). The most frequent acute toxicity was grade 1-2 pulmonary toxicity (41.9%). No acute grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred.
Conclusion
Our results show that high-dose thoracic re-RT of lung cancer can be safely delivered using highly conformal radiotherapy with favorable survival and acceptable toxicity. An optimal strategy to select patients who would benefit from re-RT is crucial in extending the indications and improving the efficacy with a sufficiently high dose.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Proton Beam Therapy
    Steven J. Frank, Indra J. Das, Charles B. Simone, Brian J. Davis, Curtiland Deville, Zhongxing Liao, Simon S. Lo, Susan L. McGovern, Rahul R. Parikh, Michael Reilly, William Small, Naomi R. Schechter
    International Journal of Particle Therapy.2024; 13: 100021.     CrossRef
  • Ultra-Hypofractionated Re-Irradiation with Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy for Locoregionally Recurrent (after Radical Chemo-Radiotherapy) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Konstantinos Filippatos, Ioannis M. Koukourakis, Stavros Anevlavis, Axiotis Giaktzidis, Michael I. Koukourakis
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5083.     CrossRef
  • Re-irradiation for intra-thoracic tumours and extra-thoracic breast cancer: dose accumulation, evaluation of efficacy and toxicity based on a literature review
    Dorota Gabrys, Roland Kulik, Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka
    The British Journal of Radiology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High Dose Thoracic Re-Irradiation and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Centrally Recurrent NSCLC
    Brane Grambozov, Markus Stana, Bernhard Kaiser, Josef Karner, Sabine Gerum, Elvis Ruznic, Barbara Zellinger, Raphaela Moosbrugger, Michael Studnicka, Gerd Fastner, Felix Sedlmayer, Franz Zehentmayr
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 573.     CrossRef
  • Toxicity of Proton Therapy versus Photon Therapy on Salvage Re-Irradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Kyungmi Yang, Yang-Gun Suh, Hyunju Shin, Hongryull Pyo, Sung Ho Moon, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh, Eunah Chung, Kwanghyun Jo, Jae Myoung Noh
    Life.2022; 12(2): 292.     CrossRef
  • Salvage proton beam therapy for locoregional recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer
    Hyunju Shin, Jae Myoung Noh, Hongryull Pyo, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2021; 39(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Thoracic re-irradiation with 3D-conformal or more advanced techniques: A systematic review of treatment safety by the Re-irradiation Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation and Oncology AIRO
    Marta Maddalo, Elisa D’Angelo, Francesco Fiorica, Angela Argenone, Melissa Scricciolo, Salvatore Cozzi, Alessia Nardangeli, Francesco Dionisi, Gianluca Costantino, Stefano Vagge, Antonio Pontoriero, Vittorio Donato, Mariangela Massaccesi
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2021; 167: 103500.     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours using an oral fixation and parameter acquisition device and TOMO technology: a randomised controlled study
    Xiaofang Zhang, Tianlu Wang, Xinyan Xiao, Xia Li, Chen Yu Wang, Bo Huang, Lei He, Yingqiu Song
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(11): e052542.     CrossRef
  • The Medical Physics Management of Reirradiation Patients
    Kelly C. Paradis, Martha M. Matuszak
    Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2020; 30(3): 204.     CrossRef
  • Reirradiation at local relapse of non-small cell lung cancer
    D.V. Gogolin, I.A. Gulidov, Y.S. Mardynsky, T.Y. Antonenko, A.Y. Buksha
    Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P.A.Gertsena.2020; 9(3): 48.     CrossRef
  • 8,337 View
  • 255 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of Breast Conserving Surgery Followed by Radiation Therapy with Mastectomy Alone for Pathologic N1 Breast Cancer Patients in the Era of Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 1418)
Gyu Sang Yoo, Won Park, Jeong Il Yu, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon-Joo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Chan Woo Wee, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Ran Park, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn, Jong Hoon Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Mison Chun, Hyung-Sik Lee, Jung Soo Kim, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1041-1051.   Published online November 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.424
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We compared the oncologic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy (BCS+RT) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) under anthracycline plus taxane-based (AT) regimens and investigated the role of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) breast cancer treated by mastectomy.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 2,011 patients with pN1 breast cancer who underwent BCS+RT or MRM alone at 12 institutions between January 2006 and December 2010. Two-to-one propensity score matching was performed for balances in variables between the groups.
Results
The median follow-up duration for the total cohort was 69 months (range, 1 to 114 months). After propensity score matching, 1,074 patients (676 in the BCS+RT group and 398 in the MRM-alone group) were analyzed finally. The overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, and regional failure-free survival (RFFS) curves of the BCS+RT group vs. MRM-alone group were not significantly different. The subgroup analysis revealed that in the group with both lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and histologic grade (HG) III, the BCS+RT showed significantly superior RFFS (p=0.008). Lymphedema (p=0.007) and radiation pneumonitis (p=0.031) occurred more frequently in the BCS+RT group than in the MRM-alone group, significantly.
Conclusion
There are no differences in oncologic outcomes between BCS+RT and MRM-alone groups under the AT chemotherapy regimens for pN1 breast cancer. However, BCS+RT group showed superior RFFS to MRM-alone group in the patients with LVI and HG III. Adjuvant RT might be considerable for pN1 breast cancer patients with LVI and HG III.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • 21-gene recurrence score in predicting the outcome of postoperative radiotherapy in T1-2N1 luminal breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery
    Shang-Jin Xie, Run-Jie Wang, San-Gang Wu, Fu-Xing Zhang
    The Breast.2024; 74: 103679.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Radiation Effects on Chemo-Treated BT20 and 4T1 Breast Cancer, and Neuroblastoma Cell Lines: A Study of Single and Multiple-Cell Ionization via Infrared Laser Trapping
    Mulugeta S. Goangul, Daniel B. Erenso, Ying Gao, Li Chen, Kwame O. Eshun, Gisela Alvarez, Horace T. Crogman
    Radiation.2024; 4(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Overall survival after mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: meta-analysis
    Kiran K Rajan, Katherine Fairhurst, Beth Birkbeck, Shonnelly Novintan, Rebecca Wilson, Jelena Savović, Chris Holcombe, Shelley Potter
    BJS Open.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy dosimetry and radiotherapy related complications of immediate implant-based reconstruction after breast cancer surgery
    Yu Zhang, Fuxiu Ye, Yun Teng, Jin Zheng, Chunlu Li, Ruilan Ma, Haichen Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients
    Gabriel De la Cruz Ku, Manish Karamchandani, Diego Chambergo-Michilot, Alexis R. Narvaez-Rojas, Michael Jonczyk, Fortunato S. Príncipe-Meneses, David Posawatz, Salvatore Nardello, Abhishek Chatterjee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(10): 6163.     CrossRef
  • Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy
    Tae Hoon Lee, Ji Hyun Chang, Bum-Sup Jang, Jae Sik Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Won Park, Yong Bae Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Wonshik Han, Han-Byoel Lee, Kyung Hwan Shin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors to identify the indication for regional nodal irradiation in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer: A joint analysis of 4,243 real-world cases from two institutions
    Guang-Yi Sun, Ge Wen, Yu-Jing Zhang, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Hui Fang, Jian-Yang Wang, Jiang-Hu Zhang, Xu-Ran Zhao, Si-Ye Chen, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Yuan Tang, Shu-Nan Qi, Ning Li, Bo Chen, Ning-Ning Lu, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Chemo-treated 4T1 breast cancer cells radiation response measured by single and multiple cell ionization using infrared laser trap
    Endris Muhammed, Li Chen, Ying Gao, Daniel Erenso
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,897 View
  • 314 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era
Jin Hee Kim, Kyungjoo Kim, Seo Jin Park, Jung-Yun Lee, Kidong Kim, Myong Cheol Lim, Jae Weon Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):788-796.   Published online September 11, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.120
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Despite the benefits of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer, there are a lack of randomized trials comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy. We compared morbidity, cost of care, and survival between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Materials and Methods
We used the Korean nationwide database to identify women with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014. Patients who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy were compared to those who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. Perioperative morbidity, the use of adjuvant therapy, and survival were evaluated after propensity score balancing.
Results
We identified 6,335 patients, including 3,235 who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy and 3,100 who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. The use of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy increased from 46.1% in 2011 to 51.8% in 2014. Patients who were younger, had a more recent year of diagnosis, and were treated in the metropolitan area were more likely to undergo a laparoscopic procedure (p < 0.001). Compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of complication, fewertransfusions, a shorter hospital stay, less adjuvant therapy, and reduced total medical costs (p < 0.001). Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a better overall survival than abdominal operation (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.85).
Conclusion
In the postdissemination era, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with more favorable morbidity profiles, a lower cost of care, and comparable survival than abdominal radical hysterectomy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Internal Validation of Predictive Models for Recurrence-Free Survival and Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Figo Stages I–IV Cervical Cancer
    Jorge Cea García, Francisco Márquez Maraver, M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez, Laura Ríos-Pena, Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lymph Node Yield, Positivity Ratio, and Overall Survival in Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Carcinoma Cervix: A Retrospective Analysis
    Subbiah Shanmugam, Jagadish Singh, Mohanasundaram Natarajan
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research Progress on the Therapeutic Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery without Uterine Ma-nipulator on Cervical Cancer
    潇予 刘
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(08): 13249.     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
    Greg Marchand, Ahmed Taher Masoud, Ahmed Abdelsattar, Alexa King, Hollie Ulibarri, Julia Parise, Amanda Arroyo, Catherine Coriell, Sydnee Goetz, Carmen Moir, Atley Moberly, Malini Govindan
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical adenosquamous carcinoma at stage IA2 to IIA2: A multicenter retrospective study
    Xiaohui Teng, Shan Kang, Weili Li, Hongmei Ding, Bin Ling, Lin Zhu, Danbo Wang, Jinghe Lang, Ping Liu, Chunlin Chen
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2023; 49(6): 1592.     CrossRef
  • The sealing effect of magnetic-sealing uterine manipulator in isolated uterus from patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a pre-clinical study
    Xue Zhou, Dongxin Liang, Qing Li, Lanbo Zhao, Yadi Bin, Feng Ma, Rongqian Wu, Yi Lv, Qiling Li
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • External Validation of the eCura System for Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer with Noncurative Endoscopic Resection
    Hyo-Joon Yang, Young-Il Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Kee Don Choi, Sang Gyun Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Jie-Hyun Kim, Sung Kwan Shin, Hyuk Lee, Wan Sik Lee, Gwang Ha Kim, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Il Ju Choi
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(4): 537.     CrossRef
  • Internal Validation of a Predictive Model for Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO stages I–IV Cervical Cancer
    Jorge Cea García, Francisco Márquez Maraver, Inmaculada Rodríguez Jiménez, Laura Ríos-Pena, M. Carmen Rubio Rodríguez
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
    Si Sun, Jing Cai, Ruixie Li, Yujia Wang, Jing Zhao, Yuhui Huang, Linjuan Xu, Qiang Yang, Zehua Wang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(3): 623.     CrossRef
  • Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy
    Rüdiger Klapdor, Hermann Hertel, Laura Delebinski, Peter Hillemanns
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 305(1): 215.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study
    Zhiqiang Li, Chunlin Chen, Ping Liu, Anwei Lu, Hongwei Zhao, Xuemei Zhan, Hui Duan, Pengfei Li, Weidong Zhao, Jilong Yao, Donglin Li, Haixia Jiang, Mubiao Liu, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 305(2): 449.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy
    J. Kampers, E. Gerhardt, P. Sibbertsen, T. Flock, H. Hertel, R. Klapdor, M. Jentschke, P. Hillemanns
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(2): 295.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH
    R. Wojdat, E. Malanowska, Harald Krentel
    BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Mengting Zhang, Wei Dai, Yuexiu Si, Yetan Shi, Xiangyuan Li, Ke Jiang, Jingyi Shen, Liying Ying
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Impaction of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy for Lymphovascular Space Invasion of Early Cervical Cancer
    Wei Huang, Yina Wang, Fanchun Yang, Ning Luo, Guihai Ai, Yuliang Wu, Zhongping Cheng
    Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2022; 11(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019
    Danuta Vasilevska, Dominika Vasilevska, Andrzej Semczuk, Vilius Rudaitis
    Medicina.2022; 58(4): 553.     CrossRef
  • The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(10): 7114.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    I.-Ning Chen, I.-Te Wang, Hsueh-Yu Mu, J.-Timothy Qiu, Wei-Min Liu, Ching-Wen Chang, Yen-Hsieh Chiu
    Cancers.2022; 14(9): 2117.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study
    Sabrina Piedimonte, Gregory R. Pond, Marie Plante, Gregg Nelson, Janice Kwon, Alon Altman, Tomer Feigenberg, Laurie Elit, Susie Lau, Jeanelle Sabourin, Karla Willows, Christa Aubrey, Ji-Hyun Jang, Ly-Ann Teo-Fortin, Norah Cockburn, Nora-Beth Saunders, Sar
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 166(2): 230.     CrossRef
  • The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
    Mario M. Leitao, Qin C. Zhou, Benny Brandt, Alexia Iasonos, Vasileios Sioulas, Katherine Lavigne Mager, Mark Shahin, Shaina Bruce, Destin R. Black, Carrie G. Kay, Meeli Gandhi, Maira Qayyum, Jennifer Scalici, Nathaniel L. Jones, Rajesh Paladugu, Jubilee B
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 166(3): 417.     CrossRef
  • New Insights in the Diagnosis of Rare Adenocarcinoma Variants of the Cervix—Case Report and Review of Literature
    Cristina Secosan, Oana Balint, Aurora Ilian, Lavinia Balan, Ligia Balulescu, Andrei Motoc, Delia Zahoi, Dorin Grigoras, Laurentiu Pirtea
    Healthcare.2022; 10(8): 1410.     CrossRef
  • Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
    Seongmin Kim, Kyung Jin Min, Sanghoon Lee, Jin Hwa Hong, Jae Yun Song, Jae Kwan Lee, Nak Woo Lee
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 174.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of lymph node metastasis after non-curative endoscopic resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer
    Hyo-Joon Yang, Jae-Young Jang, Sang Gyun Kim, Ji Yong Ahn, Su Youn Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Wan-Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung Hyun Tae, Youn
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(1): 168.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated intramucosal early gastric cancer larger than 2 cm
    Hyo-Joon Yang, Su Youn Nam, Byung-Hoon Min, Ji Yong Ahn, Jae-Young Jang, Jung Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Wan-Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung Hyun Tae, Young-Il
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(2): 435.     CrossRef
  • Conditional relative survival of cervical cancer: a Korean National Cancer Registry Study
    Dong Wook Shin, Jaeman Bae, Johyun Ha, Kyu-Won Jung
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of preoperative cross-sectional imaging in cervical cancer patients undergoing primary radical surgery
    S. Allison Staley, Katherine R. Tucker, Paola A. Gehrig, Leslie H. Clark
    Gynecologic Oncology.2021; 160(2): 384.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study
    François Zaccarini, Anna Santy, Yohann Dabi, Vincent Lavoue, Xavier Carcopino, Sofiane Bendifallah, Amélie Benbara, Pierre Collinet, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Emilie Raimond, Olivier Graesslin, Lobna Ouldamer, Emile Daraï, Cyrille Huchon, François Golfier, Cyril
    Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction.2021; 50(2): 102046.     CrossRef
  • Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis
    Juliana Rodriguez, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, James Saenz, David Ortiz Isla, Gabriel Jaime Rendon Pereira, Diego Odetto, Fabio Martinelli, Vladimir Villoslada, Ignacio Zapardiel, Lina Maria Trujillo, Milagros Perez, Marcela Hernandez, Jose Martin Saadi, Fr
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2021; 31(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith, Tiffany Nicole Jones, Diana Miao, Amanda Nickles Fader
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2021; 28(3): 544.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm
    Zhiqiang Li, Chunlin Chen, Ping Liu, Hui Duan, Mubiao Liu, Yan Xu, Pengfei Li, Wenling Zhang, Haixia Jiang, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(8): 2125.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Cancer Surgery
    Fan Chun Yang, Wei Huang, Weihong Yang, Jie Liu, Guihai Ai, Ning Luo, Jing Guo, Peng Teng Chua, Zhongping Cheng
    Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2021; 10(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups
    Johanna Kampers, E. Gerhardt, P. Sibbertsen, T. Flock, R. Klapdor, H. Hertel, M. Jentschke, P. Hillemanns
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2021; 304(3): 577.     CrossRef
  • The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
    Hyeongsu Kim, Ho Jin Jeong, Bo Wook Kim, Jong Ha Hwang
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term Outcomes of Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer with Positive Horizontal Margins after Endoscopic Resection
    Hyo-Joon Yang, Wan-Sik Lee, Bong Eun Lee, Ji Yong Ahn, Jae-Young Jang, Joo Hyun Lim, Su Youn Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Moon Kyung Joo, Jae Myung Park, Woon Geon Shin, Hang Lak Lee, Tae-Geun Gweon, Moo In Park, Jeongmin Choi, Chung Hyun Tae, Young
    Gut and Liver.2021; 15(5): 723.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies
    Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(4): 1509.     CrossRef
  • Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004–2015
    Cong Liang, Ping Liu, Zhumei Cui, Zhiqing Liang, Xiaonong Bin, Jinghe Lang, Chunlin Chen
    Gynecologic Oncology.2020; 156(1): 115.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate?
    Stefano Greggi, Gennaro Casella, Felice Scala, Francesca Falcone, Serena Visconti, Cono Scaffa
    Current Oncology Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
    Benny Brandt, Vasileios Sioulas, Derman Basaran, Theresa Kuhn, Katherine LaVigne, Ginger J. Gardner, Yukio Sonoda, Dennis S. Chi, Kara C. Long Roche, Jennifer J. Mueller, Elizabeth L. Jewell, Vance A. Broach, Oliver Zivanovic, Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum, Mario
    Gynecologic Oncology.2020; 156(3): 591.     CrossRef
  • Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach
    Alexander Melamed, Pedro T. Ramirez
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology.2020; 32(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Roni Nitecki, Pedro T. Ramirez, Michael Frumovitz, Kate J. Krause, Ana I. Tergas, Jason D. Wright, J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Alexander Melamed
    JAMA Oncology.2020; 6(7): 1019.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China
    Ting wen yi Hu, Yue Huang, Na Li, Dan Nie, Zhengyu Li
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2020; 30(8): 1143.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tanitra Tantitamit, Kuan-Gen Huang, Chyi-Long Lee
    Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020; 59(4): 481.     CrossRef
  • Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer
    Giorgio Bogani, Antonino Ditto, Valentina Chiappa, Ciro Pinelli, Cristina Sonetto, Francesco Raspagliesi
    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2020; 151(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Yizi Wang, Bo Li, Fang Ren, Zixuan Song, Ling Ouyang, Kuiran Liu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic regional radical hysterectomy showed promising clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer
    Weihong Yang, Rong Chen, Caixia Li, Li Li, Ning Luo, Zhongping Cheng
    Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2020; 9(4): 220.     CrossRef
  • A Retrospective Comparison of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early and Advanced Cancer of the Cervix, in the Post-LACC Era
    Subbiah Shanmugam, Sujay Susikar, Syed Afroze Hussain, T. Bharanidharan, Rajiv Michael
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1–IIA2 cervical cancer
    Se Ik Kim, Jae Hyun Cho, Aeran Seol, Young Im Kim, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song
    Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 153(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Minimally-Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cancer of the Cervix: The Perspective of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC)
    James R. Bentley
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada.2019; 41(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Hystérectomie radicale à effraction minimale pour le traitement d'un cancer du col de l'utérus : point de vue de la GOC
    James R. Bentley
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada.2019; 41(2): 146.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff – a multicenter analysis
    Christhardt Köhler, Hermann Hertel, Jörg Herrmann, Simone Marnitz, Peter Mallmann, Giovanni Favero, Andrea Plaikner, Peter Martus, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Achim Schneider
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2019; 29(5): 845.     CrossRef
  • After the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) survey
    Miseon Kim, Yong Beom Kim, Jae-Weon Kim
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea
    Se Ik Kim, Maria Lee, Sungyoung Lee, Dong Hoon Suh, Hee Seung Kim, Kidong Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae Hong No, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song, Yong Beom Kim
    Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 155(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • 11,572 View
  • 493 Download
  • 53 Web of Science
  • 52 Crossref
Close layer
Long-term Outcomes of One Stage Surgery Using Transanal Colorectal Tube for Acute Colorectal Obstruction of Stage II/III Distal Colon Cancer
Yusuke Okuda, Tomonori Yamada, Yoshikazu Hirata, Takaya Shimura, Ryuzo Yamaguchi, Eiji Sakamoto, Satoshi Sobue, Takahiro Nakazawa, Hiromi Kataoka, Takashi Joh
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):474-482.   Published online June 6, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.059
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Since oncological outcomes of transanal colorectal tube (TCT) placement, an endoscopic treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with acute colorectal obstruction (ACO), remain unknown, this study analyzed long-term outcomes of TCT placement for stage II/III CRC with ACO.
Materials and Methods
Data were retrospectively reviewed from consecutive patients with distal stage II/III CRC who underwent surgery between January 2007 and December 2011 at two Japanese hospitals. One hospital conducted emergency surgery and the other performed TCT placement as the standard treatment for all CRCs with ACO. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to adjust baseline characteristics between two groups.
Results
Among 754 patients with distal stage II/III CRC, 680 did not have ACO (non-ACO group) and 74 had ACO (ACO group). The PS matching between both hospitals identified 234 pairs in the non-ACO group and 23 pairs in the ACO group. In the non-ACO group, the surgical quality was equivalent between the two institutions, with no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the ACO group, the rate of primary resection/anastomosis was higher in the TCT group than in the surgery group (87.0% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between the surgery and the TCT groups in OS (5-year OS, 61.9% vs. 51.5%; p=0.490) and DFS (5-year DFS, 45.9% vs. 38.3%; p=0.658).
Conclusion
TCT placement can achieve similar long-term outcomes to emergency surgery, with a high rate of primary resection/anastomosis for distal stage II/III colon cancer with ACO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Which treatment strategy is optimal for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction? A Bayesian meta-analysis
    Kaibo Ouyang, Zifeng Yang, Yuesheng Yang, Junjiang Wang, Deqing Wu, Yong Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A multicenter case–control study of self-expanding metallic stent versus trans-anal colorectal tube for stage II/III non-right-sided obstructive colon cancer
    Yusuke Okuda, Takaya Shimura, Konomu Uno, Tomonori Yamada, Takayuki Nukui, Takashi Mizushima, Yuya Takenaka, Keisuke Itoh, Yuki Inagaki, Takanori Ozeki, Kazuhiro Nagao, Masahide Ebi, Erika Uchida, Satoshi Nomura, Yu Nojiri, Shozo Togawa, Naomi Sugimura, S
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 58(3): 217.     CrossRef
  • Long-term and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection following tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study
    Kiyoaki Sugiura, Yuki Seo, Hikaru Aoki, Yoshihiko Onishi, Yusuke Nishi, Norihiro Kishida, Motomu Tanaka, Yasuhiro Ito, Hideyuki Tokura, Takayuki Takahashi
    Surgery Today.2022; 52(9): 1284.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the prognosis of four different treatment strategies for acute left malignant colonic obstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ling Tan, Zi-lin Liu, Meng-ni Ran, Ling-han Tang, Yan-jun Pu, Yi-lei Liu, Zhou Ma, Zhou He, Jiang-wei Xiao
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A nomogram model for predicting prognosis of obstructive colorectal cancer
    Jian Lv, Yuan yuan Liu, Yi tao Jia, Jing li He, Guang yao Dai, Peng Guo, Zhao long Zhao, Yan ni Zhang, Zhong xin Li
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The long non‐coding RNA HCG18 promotes the growth and invasion of colorectal cancer cells through sponging miR‐1271 and upregulating MTDH/Wnt/β‐catenin
    Shunle Li, Tao Wu, Di Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Xinwu Zhang
    Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology.2020; 47(4): 703.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA‐876‐5p represses the cell proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer through suppressing YAP signalling via targeting RASAL2
    Li Ren, Zhiyong Zhang, Yun Feng, Miaosha Luo, Zhiming Hao
    Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology.2020; 47(5): 867.     CrossRef
  • Pathological impact of transanal colorectal tube for obstructive colorectal cancer
    Yusuke Okuda, Takaya Shimura, Hiroyuki Kato, Tomonori Yamada, Yoshikazu Hirata, Makoto Natsume, Hiroyasu Iwasaki, Ryuzo Yamaguchi, Eiji Sakamoto, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(9): 4011.     CrossRef
  • 7,503 View
  • 236 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Long-term Survival in Patients Treated with a Robotic Radiosurgical Device for Liver Metastases
Sebastian Stintzing, Jobst von Einem, Christoph Fueweger, Alfred Haidenberger, Michael Fedorov, Alexander Muavcevic
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):187-193.   Published online April 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.594
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The treatment of liver metastases with local procedures is a fast progressing field. For the most, long-term survival data is missing raising questions with regard to the efficacy of such modalities when compared to surgical resection. Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife device enables the treatment of liver lesions with a single-session approach. Here we present long-term survival data to explore the curative potential of this strategy.
Materials and Methods
Patients with oligo-metastatic disease limited to the liver have been treated with single-session or hypo-fractioned radiosurgery in curative intent and prospectively followed until death. Follow-up (FU) was performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2 months after radiation and at 3-month intervals for the first 2 years. After that annual computed tomography or MRI scans were performed until 5 years post-treatment. Local recurrence in the radiated volume and recurrence outside the treated volume were used to define local and distant progression. Survival times were censored at the time of the last FU.
Results
One hundred twenty-six patients treated between 2005 and 2015 with 194 lesions were included into this study. Median FU was 30.0 months. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 55.2% had a complete remission and 11.3% a partial remission. Seventy-two point two percent recurred outside the radiated lesion and median overall survival was 35.2 months with a 3-year survival rate of 47.7%.
Conclusion
This is currently the largest cohort of stereotactic body radiation therapy treated liver lesions with a median long-term follow of 30 months. Robotic radiosurgery using a single session approach has a high efficacy to control the radiated lesion with the potential to cure patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Evidence Quality Assessment
    Ilektra Kyrochristou, Ilias Giannakodimos, Maria Tolia, Ioannis Georgakopoulos, Nikolaos Pararas, Francesk Mulita, Nikolaos Machairas, Dimitrios Schizas
    Diagnostics.2024; 14(10): 1055.     CrossRef
  • Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy for Liver Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines
    Ciro Franzese, Alexander V. Louie, Rupesh Kotecha, Zhenwei Zhang, Matthias Guckenberger, Mi-Sook Kim, Alison C. Tree, Ben J. Slotman, Arjun Sahgal, Marta Scorsetti
    Practical Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review
    Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf, Salem Alshehri, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Syahir Mansor, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido, Mamdouh Alqathami
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    A. N. Moskalenko, V. K. Lyadov, I. V. Sagaydak, M. V.  Chernykh, N. N. Britskaya
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Anti-EGFR Therapy Induces EGF Secretion by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Confer Colorectal Cancer Chemoresistance
    Colleen M. Garvey, Roy Lau, Alyssa Sanchez, Ren X. Sun, Emma J. Fong, Michael E. Doche, Oscar Chen, Anthony Jusuf, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Brent Larson, Shannon M. Mumenthaler
    Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1393.     CrossRef
  • 7,867 View
  • 152 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Survival and Functional Outcome after Treatment for Primary Base of Tongue Cancer: A Comparison of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Sangjoon Park, Yeona Cho, Jeongshim Lee, Yoon Woo Koh, Se-Heon Kim, Eun Chang Choi, Hye Ryun Kim, Ki Chang Keum, Kyung Ran Park, Chang Geol Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1214-1225.   Published online December 26, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.498
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in patients with primary base of tongue (BOT) cancer who received definitive radiotherapy (RT) or surgery followed by radiotherapy (SRT).
Materials and Methods
Between January 2002 andDecember 2016, 102 patientswith stage I-IVB primary BOT cancer underwent either definitive RT (n=46) or SRT (n=56), and treatment outcomeswere compared between two groups. The expression of p16 was also analyzed.
Results
The RT group had more patients with advanced T stage (T3-4) disease (58.7% vs. 35.7%, p=0.021) and who received chemotherapy (91.3% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001) than the SRT group. At a median followup of 36.9 months (range, 3.3 to 181.5 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 75.5% and 68.7%, respectively. With respect to treatment group, the 5-year OS and DFS in the RT and SRT groups did not differ significantly (OS, 68.7% vs. 80.5%, p=0.601; DFS, 63.1% vs. 73.1%, p=0.653). In multivariate analysis, OS differed significantly according to p16 expression (p16-negative vs. p16- positive; hazard ratio [HR], 0.145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.025 to 0.853; p=0.033). Regarding DFS, p16 expression (p16-negative vs. p16-positive; HR, 0.164; 95% CI, 0.045 to 0.598; p=0.006) showed a significant effect in multivariate analysis. Functional defects (late grade ≥ 3 dysphagia or voice alteration) were more frequently reported in the SRT than in the RT group (16.1% vs. 2.2%, p=0.021).
Conclusion
Despite advanced disease, patients in the RT group showed comparable survival outcomes and better functional preservation than those in the SRT group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Treatment de‐escalation for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Fausto Petrelli, Andrea Luciani, Antonio Ghidini, Sara Cherri, Paolo Gamba, Marta Maddalo, Paolo Bossi, Alberto Zaniboni
    Head & Neck.2022; 44(5): 1255.     CrossRef
  • Ginsenoside Rd inhibits migration and invasion of tongue cancer cells through H19/miR-675-5p/CDH1 axis
    Lu CHANG, Dongxu WANG, Shaoning KAN, Ming HAO, Huimin LIU, Zhijing YANG, Qianyun XIA, Weiwei LIU
    Journal of Applied Oral Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer in the Era of Modern Radiation Techniques
    Tae Hyung Kim, In-Ho Cha, Eun Chang Choi, Hye Ryun Kim, Hyung Jun Kim, Se-Heon Kim, Ki Chang Keum, Chang Geol Lee
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy for cancer: A case report
    Hong Loi Nguyen, Truong Phu M. Ho, Xuan Phu Tran, Thanh Xuan Nguyen
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases.2021; 7(2): 100219.     CrossRef
  • Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy
    Ambika Parmar, Michaelina Macluskey, Niall Mc Goldrick, David I Conway, Anne-Marie Glenny, Janet E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Kelvin KW Chan
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Larynx-preserving reconstruction after extended base of the tongue resection
    Hideki Kadota, Junichi Fukushima, Sei Yoshida, Kenichi Kamizono, Muneyuki Masuda, Satoshi Toh, Ryuji Yasumatsu, Torahiko Nakashima, Takashi Nakagawa
    Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.2020; 73(4): 740.     CrossRef
  • 9,739 View
  • 228 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
The Impact of Surgical Timing on Pathologic Tumor Response after Short Course and Long Course Preoperative Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Sea-Won Lee, Jong Hoon Lee, In Kyu Lee, Seong Taek Oh, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Jae Hwan Oh, Ji Yeon Baek, Hee Jin Chang, Hee Chul Park, Hee Cheol Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, Taek-Keun Nam, Hong Seok Jang
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):1039-1050.   Published online November 21, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.252
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
A pooled analysis of multi-institutional trials was performed to analyze the effect of surgical timing on tumor response by comparing short course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with long course CCRT followed by delayed surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Materials and Methods
Three hundred patients with cT3-4N0-2 rectal adenocarcinoma were included. Long course patients from KROG 14-12 (n=150) were matched 1:1 to 150 short course patients from KROG 10-01 (NCT01129700) and KROG 11-02 (NCT01431599) according to stage, age, and other risk factors. The primary endpoint was to determine the interval between surgery and the last day of neoadjuvant CCRT which yields the best tumor response after the short course and long course CCRT. Downstaging was defined as ypT0-2N0M0 and pathologic complete response (ypCR) was defined as ypT0N0M0, respectively.
Results
Both the long and short course groups achieved lowest downstaging rates at < 6 weeks (long 20% vs. short 8%) and highest downstaging rates at 6-7 weeks (long 44% vs. short 40%). The ypCR rates were lowest at < 6 weeks (both long and short 0%) and highest at 6-7 weeks (long 21% vs. short 11%) in both the short and long course arms. The downstaging and ypCR rates of long course group gradually declined after the peak at 6-7 weeks and those of the short course group trend to constantly increase afterwards.
Conclusion
It is optimal to perform surgery at least 6 weeks after both the short course and long course CCRT to obtain maximal tumor regression in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association between personality types and low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients following surgery
    Ting‐Yu Chiang, Yu‐Jen Hsu, Yih‐Jong Chern, Chun‐Kai Liao, Wen‐Sy Tsai, Pao‐Shiu Hsieh, Hung‐Chih Hsu, Yu‐Fen Lin, Hsiu‐Lan Lee, Jeng‐Fu You
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lateral Lymph Node Size and Tumor Distance From Anal Verge Accurately Predict Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(6): 785.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ri Na Yoo, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(6): 1556.     CrossRef
  • Does a long interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery benefit the clinical outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer? A systematic review and meta analyses
    Miao Yu, Deng-Chao Wang, Sheng Li, Li-Yan Huang, Jian Wei
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(4): 855.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Factors of Complete Pathological Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    AmirHossein Latif, Mohammad Shirkhoda, Mohammad Reza Rouhollahi, Saeed Nemati, Seyed Hossein Yahyazadeh, Kazem Zendehdel, Ahmad Reza Soroush, Aidin Yaghoobi Notash
    Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases.2022; 14(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • Practical recommendation for treatment of patients with colon cancer during covid-19 pandemic
    M. Yu. Fedyanin
    Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council.2020; (9): 213.     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long-course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer
    É J Ryan, D P O'Sullivan, M E Kelly, A Z Syed, P C Neary, P R O'Connell, D O Kavanagh, D C Winter, J M O'Riordan
    British Journal of Surgery.2019; 106(10): 1298.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) with delayed surgery versus preoperative long-course radiotherapy for locally resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Wang Qiaoli, Huang Yongping, Xiong Wei, Xu Guoqiang, Ju Yunhe, Liu Qiuyan, Li Cheng, Guo Mengling, Li Jiayi, Xiong Wei, Yang Yi
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(12): 2171.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of long course and short course preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yongjun Yu, Yuwei Li, Chen Xu, Zhao Zhang, Xipeng Zhang
    Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 9,469 View
  • 332 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Survival Nomograms after Curative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Surgery for Stage IB2-IIIB Cervical Cancer
Claudia Marchetti, Francesca De Felice, Anna Di Pinto, Alessia Romito, Angela Musella, Innocenza Palaia, Marco Monti, Vincenzo Tombolin, Ludovico Muzii, PierLuigi Benedetti Panici
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):768-776.   Published online July 19, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.141
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to develop nomograms for predicting the probability of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery.
Materials and Methods
Nomograms to predict the 5-year OS rates and the 2-year PFS rates were constructed. Calibration plots were constructed, and concordance indices were calculated. Evaluated variableswere body mass index, age, tumor size, tumor histology, grading, lymphovascular space invasion, positive parametria, and positive lymph nodes.
Results
In total 245 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery were included for the construction of the nomogram. The 5-year OS and PFS were 72.6% and 66%, respectively. Tumor size, grading, and parametria status affected the rate of OS, whereas tumor size and positive parametria were the main independent PFS prognostic factors.
Conclusion
We constructed a nomogram based on clinicopathological features in order to predict 2-year PFS and 5-year OS in locally advanced cervical cancer primarily treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. This tool might be particularly helpful for assisting in the follow-up of cervical cancer patients who have not undergone concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Plasma-based proteomic and metabolomic characterization of lung and lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients
    Yue Feng, Zijian Sun, Huan Zhang, Zhao Wang, Lichao Wang, Hui Ye, Xiaojing Zhang, Zhuomin Yin, Juan Ni, Jingkui Tian, Hanmei Lou, Xiaojuan Lv, Wei Zhu
    Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.2025; 253: 116521.     CrossRef
  • Dose prediction for cervical cancer in radiotherapy based on the beam channel generative adversarial network
    Hui Xie, Tao Tan, Hua Zhang, Qing Li
    Heliyon.2024; 10(18): e37472.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction models used in cervical cancer
    Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Umeshkumar B. Sherkhane, Vinay Jaiswar, Biche Osong, Nilendu Purandare, Sadhana Kannan, Kumar Prabhash, Sudeep Gupta, Ben Vanneste, Venkatesh Rangarajan, Andre Dekker, Leonard Wee
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.2023; 139: 102549.     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of radiomic signature for predicting overall survival in advanced-stage cervical cancer
    Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Umeshkumar B. Sherkhane, Vinay Jaiswar, Sneha Shah, Nilendu Purandare, Kumar Prabhash, Amita Maheshwari, Sudeep Gupta, Leonard Wee, V. Rangarajan, Andre Dekker
    Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced cervical stump cancer after laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy: a case report of imaging, laparoscopic staging and treatment approach
    Dimitrios Andrikos, Argyrios Andrikos, Antoine Naem, Olga Ebertz, Rajesh Devassy, Rudy Leon De Wilde, Michael Khamou, Harald Krentel
    BMC Women's Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Successful neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus sintilimab for locally advanced cervical cancer: case series and review of the literature
    Linlin Liu, Xianbo Deng, Shuang Guo, Shouhua Yang
    Diagnostic Pathology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the Clinical Nursing Pathway on Nursing Outcomes and Complications of Cervical Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy via PICC
    Hongxia Tang, Li Gao, Yahui Li, Zhiqian Zhang
    Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Current and future direction in treatment of HPV-related cervical disease
    Niloofar Khairkhah, Azam Bolhassani, Reza Najafipour
    Journal of Molecular Medicine.2022; 100(6): 829.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning of Dose-Volume Histogram Parameters Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy
    Zhiyuan Xu, Li Yang, Qin Liu, Hao Yu, Longhua Chen, Claudia Marchetti
    Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab on cervical cancer: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
    Lin Qi, Ning Li, Aimin Lin, Xiuli Wang, Jianglin Cong
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy
    Jing Liu, Guyu Tang, Qin Zhou, Weilu Kuang
    Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The comparative study for survival outcome of locally advanced cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant arterial interventional chemotherapy or intravenous chemotherapy followed by surgery or concurrent chemoradiation
    Yi Sun, Gailing Li, Panpan Hai, Yuan Cao, Pin Han, Yuchen Liu, Jing Wen, Yuanpei Wang, Xiaoran Cheng, Fang Ren
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pembrolizumab for advanced cervical cancer: safety and efficacy
    Francesca De Felice, Elena Giudice, Giulia Bolomini, Maria Grazia Distefano, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Fagotti, Claudia Marchetti
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2021; 21(2): 221.     CrossRef
  • Nomograms predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer
    Yifan Feng, Ye Wang, Yangqin Xie, Shuwei Wu, Yuyang Li, Min Li
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of therapeutic effects of chemo-radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in patients with bulky cervical carcinoma (stage IB3 & IIA2)
    Setareh Akhavan, Abbas Alibakhshi, Mahdieh Parsapoor, Abbas Alipour, Elahe Rezayof
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Macleayins A From Macleaya Promotes Cell Apoptosis Through Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway and Inhibits Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion in Cervical Cancer HeLa Cells
    Chunmei Sai, Wei Qin, Junyu Meng, Li-Na Gao, Lufen Huang, Zhen Zhang, Huannan Wang, Haixia Chen, Chaohua Yan
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging
    Lele Zang, Qin Chen, Xiaozhen Zhang, Xiaohong Zhong, Jian Chen, Yi Fang, An Lin, Min Wang
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 9391.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of early response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: Value of multi-parameter MRI combined with clinical prognostic factors
    Xiaomin Zheng, Weiqian Guo, Jiangning Dong, Liting Qian
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2020; 72: 159.     CrossRef
  • Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study
    Guilan Xie, Ruiqi Wang, Li Shang, Cuifang Qi, Liren Yang, Liyan Huang, Wenfang Yang, Mei Chun Chung
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • SPP1 inhibition improves the cisplatin chemo-sensitivity of cervical cancer cell lines
    Xing Chen, Dongsheng Xiong, Liya Ye, Huichun Yang, Shuangshuang Mei, Jinhong Wu, Shanshan Chen, Ruoran Mi
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2019; 83(4): 603.     CrossRef
  • Systemic therapy in cervical cancer: 30 years in review
    Michalis Liontos, Anastasios Kyriazoglou, Ioannis Dimitriadis, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, Aristotelis Bamias
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2019; 137: 9.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng Li, Mengyang Hu, Yuanjian Wang, Xingsheng Yang
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2019; 238: 1.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-to-IIB cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Lei Li, Ming Wu, Shuiqing Ma, Xianjie Tan, Sen Zhong
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2019; 24(11): 1440.     CrossRef
  • Immune check-point in cervical cancer
    F. De Felice, C. Marchetti, I. Palaia, R. Ostuni, L. Muzii, V. Tombolini, P. Benedetti Panici
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2018; 129: 40.     CrossRef
  • 9,590 View
  • 396 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
Are We Predicting Disease Progress of the Rectal Cancer Patients without Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy?
Bo Young Oh, Jung Wook Huh, Woo Yong Lee, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):634-645.   Published online July 3, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.069
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
There are patients who do not undergo surgery, regardless of tumor response for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer. However, there have been few reports focused on how oncologic outcomes are worse in these patients. We sought to investigate oncologic outcomes for these non-operated patients with rectal cancer after nCRT.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1,063 records of patients with rectal cancer who were treated with nCRT from January 2002 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. We categorized patients into the non-operated group (n=77), transanal local excision (TLE) group (n=54), ortotal mesorectal excision (TME) group (n=932) and compared each group using propensity score matching.
Results
In the non-operated group, the most common reason for no surgery was patient refusal (n=64). Eleven patients were considered to have achieve clinical complete response (cCR), which was an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival (p=0.045). In patients with disease progression in the non-operated group, the overall survival did not improved according to salvage treatments (p=0.451). The non-operated group showed worse survivals compared to the TLE or TME group before and after matching (p < 0.001). This finding was also noted in the analysis of survival only in patients with cCR.
Conclusion
In this study, non-operated patients did not secure oncologic safety regardless of cCR after nCRT. Our results suggest that a non-operative management must be carefully considered even if cCR is achieved.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term efficacy of transanal local excision versus total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Yihui Lei, Li Lin, Qiming Shao, Weiping Chen, Guoyan Liu, Antonio Brillantino
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294510.     CrossRef
  • Non-operative Management (NOM) of Rectal Cancer: Literature Review and Translation of Evidence into Practice
    Christopher J. Anker, Dmitriy Akselrod, Steven Ades, Nancy A. Bianchi, Nataniel H. Lester-Coll, Peter A. Cataldo
    Current Colorectal Cancer Reports.2021; 17(2): 23.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors and Treatment of Recurrence after Local Excision of Rectal Cancer
    Moon Suk Choi, Jung Wook Huh, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2021; 62(12): 1107.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of stage I‐III rectal cancer: Who is refusing surgery?
    Adam C. Fields, Pamela W. Lu, James Yoo, Jennifer Irani, Joel E. Goldberg, Ronald Bleday, Nelya Melnitchouk
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 121(6): 990.     CrossRef
  • MRI Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: 2020 Guide for Practice from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology
    Seong Ho Park, Seung Hyun Cho, Sang Hyun Choi, Jong Keon Jang, Min Ju Kim, Seung Ho Kim, Joon Seok Lim, Sung Kyoung Moon, Ji Hoon Park, Nieun Seo
    Korean Journal of Radiology.2020; 21(7): 812.     CrossRef
  • Survival Effects of Cytoreductive Surgery for Refractory Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Wonkyo Shin, Joseph J. Noh, Sang-Soo Seo, Sokbom Kang, Chel-Hun Choi, Sang-Yoon Park, Byoung-Gie Kim, Myong Cheol Lim
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2020; 61(11): 935.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Risk of Rectal Preservation Against Medical Advice After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Comparative Cross‐Sectional Study with Rectal Preservation as Supported by Surgeon
    Kwang‐Seop Song, Sung Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Jae Hwan Oh, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung‐Bum Ryoo, Seung‐Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    World Journal of Surgery.2019; 43(12): 3216.     CrossRef
  • 10,373 View
  • 246 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Current Trends of Lung Cancer Surgery and Demographic and Social Factors Related to Changes in the Trends of Lung Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of the National Database from 2010 to 2014
Samina Park, In Kyu Park, Eung Re Kim, Yoohwa Hwang, Hyun Joo Lee, Chang Hyun Kang, Young Tae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):330-337.   Published online July 18, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.196
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We investigated current trends in lung cancer surgery and identified demographic and social factors related to changes in these trends.
Materials and Methods
We estimated the incidence of lung cancer surgery using a procedure code-based approach provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (http://opendata.hira.or.kr). The population data were obtained every year from 2010 to 2014 from the Korean Statistical Information Service (http://kosis.kr/). The annual percent change (APC) and statistical significance were calculated using the Joinpoint software.
Results
From January 2010 to December 2014, 25,687 patients underwent 25,921 lung cancer surgeries, which increased by 45.1% from 2010 to 2014. The crude incidence rate of lung cancer surgery in each year increased significantly (APC, 9.5; p < 0.05). The male-to-female ratio decreased from 2.1 to 1.6 (APC, −6.3; p < 0.05). The incidence increased in the age group of ≥ 70 years for both sexes (male: APC, 3.7; p < 0.05; female: APC, 5.96; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the proportion of female patients aged ≥ 65 years increased (APC, 7.2; p < 0.05), while that of male patients aged < 65 years decreased (APC, −3.9; p < 0.05). The proportions of segmentectomies (APC, 17.8; p < 0.05) and lobectomies (APC, 7.5; p < 0.05) increased, while the proportion of pneumonectomies decreased (APC, −6.3; p < 0.05). Finally, the proportion of patients undergoing surgery in Seoul increased (APC, 1.1; p < 0.05), while the proportion in other areas decreased (APC, −1.5; p < 0.05).
Conclusion
An increase in the use of lung cancer surgery in elderly patients and female patients, and a decrease in the proportion of patients requiring extensive pulmonary resection were identified. Furthermore, centralization of lung cancer surgery was noted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical characteristics and course of pulmonary artery stump thrombosis following lung cancer surgery: A retrospective study from tertiary care hospital
    Ji-Eun Park, Seung-Ick Cha, Deok Heon Lee, Eung Bae Lee, Sun Ha Choi, Yong Hoon Lee, Hyewon Seo, Seung-Soo Yoo, Shin-Yup Lee, Jaehee Lee, Chang-Ho Kim, Jae-Yong Park
    Medicine.2024; 103(2): e36879.     CrossRef
  • Lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment: The radiologist's perspective
    Bingqing Long, Zeng Xiong, Manzo Habou
    Meta-Radiology.2024; 2(1): 100066.     CrossRef
  • Inter-prefectural and urban–rural regional disparities in lung cancer surgery: a Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2017 to 2019
    Masamitsu Kido, Satoru Okada, Naoyuki Takashima, Luying Yan, Atsuki Uchibori, Koji Sensaki, Tetsuo Kido, Masayoshi Inoue
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(12): 1428.     CrossRef
  • Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a matched-pair study
    Seyer Safi, Maximilian Robert Gysan, Dorothea Weber, Rouven Behnisch, Thomas Muley, Michael Allgäuer, Hauke Winter, Hans Hoffmann, Martin Eichhorn
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening for Lung Cancer, Overdiagnosis, and Healthcare Utilization: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
    So Yeon Kim, Gerard A. Silvestri, Yeon Wook Kim, Roger Y. Kim, Sang-Won Um, Yunjoo Im, Jung Hye Hwang, Seung Ho Choi, Jung Seop Eom, Kang Mo Gu, Yong-Soo Kwon, Shin Yup Lee, Hyun Woo Lee, Dong Won Park, Yeonjeong Heo, Seung Hun Jang, Kwang Yong Choi, Yeol
    Journal of Thoracic Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced surgical technologies for lung cancer treatment: Current status and perspectives
    Hongfei Cai, Yonghui Wang, Da Qin, Youbin Cui, Hongbo Zhang
    Engineered Regeneration.2023; 4(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • Domestic medical travel from non-Seoul regions to Seoul for initial breast cancer treatment: a nationwide cohort study
    Jae Ho Jeong, Jinhong Jung, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Beom-Seok Ko, Byung Ho Son, Kyung Hae Jung, Il Yong Chung
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge root extract induces apoptosis of murine lung carcinoma cells in vitro
    Minjeong Kwon, Jongbeom Chae, Ju-Ock Nam
    Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disparities in lung cancer short- and long-term outcomes after surgery: Analysis from the national cancer database
    Mark R. Korst, Aman M. Patel, Daniel J. Garcia, Akash R. Patel, Hassaam S. Choudhry, Joseph G. Santitoro, Vincent Yeung, Joshua A. Kra
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2023; 37: 100777.     CrossRef
  • Trend of lung cancer surgery, hospital selection, and survival between 2005 and 2016 in South Korea
    Dohun Kim, Gil‐Won Kang, Hoyeon Jang, Jun Yeun Cho, Bumhee Yang, Hee Chul Yang, Jinwook Hwang
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(2): 210.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Lung Cancer and Surgery Based on Studies Using a Nationwide Database
    Dohun Kim, Jung-Won Lee
    Journal of Chest Surgery.2022; 55(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of textbook outcome after lobectomy for early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer in a Korean institution: A retrospective study
    Woo Sik Yu, Jaeyong Shin, Jung A Son, Joonho Jung, Seokjin Haam
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(8): 1211.     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary vein stump thrombosis after lung resection for lung cancer: clinical features and outcome
    Ji-Eun Park, Seung-Ick Cha, Deok Heon Lee, Eung Bae Lee, Sun Ha Choi, Yong Hoon Lee, Hyewon Seo, Seung-Soo Yoo, Shin-Yup Lee, Jaehee Lee, Chang-Ho Kim, Jae-Yong Park
    Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis.2022; 33(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Healthcare vulnerability disparities in pancreatic cancer treatment and mortality using the Korean National Sample Cohort: a retrospective cohort study
    Sung Hoon Jeong, Hyeon Ji Lee, Choa Yun, Il Yun, Yun Hwa Jung, Soo Young Kim, Hee Seung Lee, Sung-In Jang
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trends in the traditional cardiothoracic surgery resident operative experience for cardiac cases: An analysis of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs
    Aakash M. Shah, Emaad Siddiqui, Sari D. Holmes, Alexis Okoh, Mohamed Abdullah, Kristopher Deatrick, Sunjay Kaushal, Justin Sambol
    The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2021; 161(3): 1064.     CrossRef
  • Does Delaying Time in Cancer Treatment Affect Mortality? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Korean Lung and Gastric Cancer Patients
    Kyu-Tae Han, Woorim Kim, Seungju Kim
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(7): 3462.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: right drugs, right patient, right time?
    Elizabeth Ahern, Ben J Solomon, Rina Hui, Nick Pavlakis, Ken O'Byrne, Brett G M Hughes
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.2021; 9(6): e002248.     CrossRef
  • Do Patients Residing in Provincial Areas Transport and Spend More on Cancer Treatment in Korea?
    Woorim Kim, Kyu-Tae Han, Seungju Kim
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(17): 9247.     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Korean National Health Insurance Database
    Woo Sik Yu, Mi Kyung Bae, Jung Kyu Choi, Young Ki Hong, In Kyu Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(4): 1104.     CrossRef
  • Rare location and drainage pattern of right pulmonary veins and aberrant right upper lobe bronchial branch: A case report
    Fu-Qiang Wang, Rui Zhang, Han-Lu Zhang, Yun-Hai Mo, Yu Zheng, Guang-Hao Qiu, Yun Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(32): 9954.     CrossRef
  • Comment on: ‘Hospital lung surgery volume and patient outcomes’
    Rob Stirling, Michael Stenger, John Zalcberg
    Lung Cancer.2020; 142: 138.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes after aortic aneurysm repair in patients with history of cancer: a nationwide dataset analysis
    Sanghyun Ahn, Jin-Young Min, Hyunyoung G. Kim, Hyejin Mo, Seung-Kee Min, Sangil Min, Jongwon Ha, Kyoung-Bok Min
    BMC Surgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Time trends and predictors of survival in surgically resected early‐stage non–small cell lung cancer patients
    Jitesh B. Shewale, Erin M. Corsini, Arlene M. Correa, Eric L. Brown, Luis G. Leon‐Novelo, Alan G. Nyitray, Mara B. Antonoff, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Reza J. Mehran, David C. Rice, Jack Roth, Garrett L. Walsh, Ara A. Vaporciyan, Stephen G. Swisher, Boris Sepe
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 122(3): 495.     CrossRef
  • Patterns of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of the lung and risk of PTNB-related severe pneumothorax: A nationwide population-based study
    Bo Ram Yang, Mi-Sook Kim, Chang Min Park, Soon Ho Yoon, Kum Ju Chae, Joongyub Lee, James West
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(7): e0235599.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer
    Haley Hoy, Thuy Lynch, Monica Beck
    Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America.2019; 31(3): 303.     CrossRef
  • Higher Age Puts Lung Cancer Patients at Risk for Not Receiving Anti-cancer Treatment
    Won-Il Choi, Jiah Choi, Mi-Ae Kim, Gyumin Lee, Jihyeon Jeong, Choong Won Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1241.     CrossRef
  • Recent Trends in Demographics, Surgery, and Prognosis of Patients with Surgically Resected Lung Cancer in a Single Institution from Korea
    Jae Kwang Yun, Han Pil Lee, Geun Dong Lee, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Dong Kwan Kim, Seung-Il Park, Sehoon Choi
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pharmacodynamics of Pre-Operative PD1 checkpoint blockade and receptor activator of NFkB ligand (RANKL) inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase 1B/2, translational trial (POPCORN)
    Elizabeth Ahern, Annette Cubitt, Emma Ballard, Michele W. L. Teng, William C. Dougall, Mark J. Smyth, David Godbolt, Rishendran Naidoo, Amanda Goldrick, Brett G. M. Hughes
    Trials.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Progress in the Management of Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in 2017
    Jessica S. Donington, Young Tae Kim, Betty Tong, Andre L. Moreira, Jamie Bessich, Kathleen D. Weiss, Yolonda L. Colson, Dennis Wigle, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon, Jeffrey Zweig, Heather Wakelee, Justin Blasberg, Megan Daly, Leah Backhus, Paul Van Schil
    Journal of Thoracic Oncology.2018; 13(6): 767.     CrossRef
  • 10,683 View
  • 290 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 29 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP