Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
24 "Staging"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Validation of 2023 FIGO Stage IA1–IIIC2 Endometrial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Tertiary Centers in South Korea and Taiwan
Myeong-Seon Kim, Yen-Ling Lai, Yurimi Lee, Hyun-Soo Kim, Yu-Li Chen, Yoo-Young Lee
Received December 11, 2024  Accepted February 10, 2025  Published online February 17, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.1190    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
As understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of endometrial carcinoma (EC) advanced, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was revised in 2023. This study compared EC survival outcomes using the 2009 and 2023 FIGO staging systems.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 3,029 patients diagnosed with 2009 FIGO stage I–III EC between 1985 and 2022 in South Korea, and between 2020 and 2022 in Taiwan. All patients were reclassified using the 2023 FIGO staging, and survival and risk factors were examined under both systems.
Results
Transitioning from the 2009 to 2023 FIGO resulted in 549 (18.0%) patients being upstaged and their survival curves being diversified, indicating significant prognostic value of the 2023 FIGO. Re-classification using the 2023 FIGO upstaged the 2009 FIGO stage IA high-risk ECs, allowing more intensive treatment and potentially improving survival outcomes. The most significant changes occurred in the 2009 FIGO stages IA, IB, and IIIA ECs: upstaging in 16.5%, 49.0%, and 2.0% of IA, IB, and IIIA tumors, respectively, and downstaging 0.3% and 40.8% of IB and IIIA tumors, respectively. The risk factors for poor survival included old age (≥60), menopause, diabetes, substantial lymphovascular space invasion, aberrant p53 expression, and some aggressive histological types (carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine carcinoma).
Conclusion
The 2023 FIGO staging provides more refined stratification of early-stage EC than the 2009 version. Thus, the 2023 FIGO may more accurately guide prognosis and therapeutic decision-making.
  • 752 View
  • 86 Download
Close layer
Lung and Thoracic cancer
Differences in the Prognostic Impact between Single-Zone and Multi-Zone N2 Node Metastasis in Patients with Station-Based Multiple N2 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Shia Kim, Geun Dong Lee, SeHoon Choi, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Dong Kwan Kim, Seung-Il Park, Jae Kwang Yun
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(1):95-104.   Published online July 22, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.120
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer suggests further subdivision of pathologic N (pN) category in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by incorporating the location and number of involved lymph node (LN) stations. We reclassified patients with the station-based N2b disease into single-zone and multi-zone N2b groups and compared survival outcomes between the groups.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study included patients with pN2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy from 2006 to 2019. The N2 disease was subdivided into four categories: single-station N2 without N1 (N2a1), single-station N2 with N1 (N2a2), multiple-station N2 with single zone involvement (single-zone N2b), and multiple-station N2 with multiple zone involvement (multi-zone N2b). LN zones included in the subdivision of N2 disease were upper mediastinal, lower mediastinal, aortopulmonary, and subcarinal.
Results
Among 996 eligible patients, 211 (21.2%), 394 (39.6%), and 391 (39.3%) were confirmed to have pN2a1, pN2a2, and pN2b disease, respectively. In multivariable analysis after adjustment for sex, age, pT category, and adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival was significantly better with single-zone N2b disease (n=125, 12.6%) than with multi-zone N2b disease (n=266, 26.7%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.90; p=0.009) and was comparable to that of N2a2 disease (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.49; p=0.46).
Conclusion
Prognosis of single-zone LN metastasis was better than that of multiple-zone LN metastasis in patients with N2b NSCLC. Along with the station-based N descriptors, zone-based descriptors might ensure optimal staging, enabling the most appropriate decision-making on adjuvant therapy for patients with pN2 NSCLC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Using Primary Tumor Somatic Mutation Data
    Victor Lee, Nicholas S. Moore, Joshua Doyle, Daniel Hicks, Patrick Oh, Shari Bodofsky, Sajid Hossain, Abhijit A. Patel, Sanjay Aneja, Robert Homer, Henry S. Park
    JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 1,984 View
  • 123 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Genitourinary cancer
TNM-Based Head-to-Head Comparison of Urachal Carcinoma and Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Stage-Matched Analysis of a Large Multicenter National Cohort
Sang Hun Song, Jaewon Lee, Young Hwii Ko, Jong Wook Kim, Seung Il Jung, Seok Ho Kang, Jinsung Park, Ho Kyung Seo, Hyung Joon Kim, Byong Chang Jeong, Tae-Hwan Kim, Se Young Choi, Jong Kil Nam, Ja Yoon Ku, Kwan Joong Joo, Won Sik Jang, Young Eun Yoon, Seok Joong Yun, Sung-Hoo Hong, Jong Jin Oh
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(4):1337-1345.   Published online April 17, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.417
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Outcome analysis of urachal cancer (UraC) is limited due to the scarcity of cases and different staging methods compared to urothelial bladder cancer (UroBC). We attempted to assess survival outcomes of UraC and compare to UroBC after stage-matched analyses.
Materials and Methods
Total 203 UraC patients from a multicenter database and 373 UroBC patients in single institution from 2000 to 2018 were enrolled (median follow-up, 32 months). Sheldon stage conversion to corresponding TNM staging for UraC was conducted for head-to-head comparison to UroBC. Perioperative clinical variables and pathological results were recorded. Stage-matched analyses for survival by stage were conducted.
Results
UraC patients were younger (mean age, 54 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001), with 163 patients (80.3%) receiving partial cystectomy and 23 patients (11.3%) radical cystectomy. UraC was more likely to harbor ≥ pT3a tumors (78.8% vs. 41.8%). While 5-year recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival were comparable between two groups (63.4%, 67%, and 62.1% in UraC and 61.5%, 75.9%, and 67.8% in UroBC, respectively), generally favorable prognosis for UraC in lower stages (pT1-2) but unfavorable outcomes in higher stages (pT4) compared to UroBC was observed, although only 5-year CSS in ≥ pT4 showed statistical significance (p=0.028). Body mass index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.929), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.921), pathologic T category (HR, 3.846), and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.993) were predictors of CSS for all patients.
Conclusion
Despite differing histology, UraC has comparable prognosis to UroBC with relatively favorable outcome in low stages but worse prognosis in higher stages. The presented system may be useful for future grading and risk stratification of UraC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Urachal Carcinomas: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Caio Vinícius Suartz, Lucas Motta Martinez, Marcelo Henrique Lima Silvestre, Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Pedro Henrique Souza Brito, Ketlyn Assunção Galhardo, Roberto Iglesias Lopes, Victor Hondo Silva de Moraes, Caio Mazzonetto Teofilo de Moraes, Luana Cov
    International braz j urol.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Presentation and Targeted Interventions in Urachal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Case Series and Review of Emerging Therapies
    Akshay Mathavan, Akash Mathavan, Rodrigo Murillo-Alvarez, Kriti Gera, Urszula Krekora, Aaron J. Winer, Mohit Mathavan, Ellery Altshuler, Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2024; 22(1): 67.     CrossRef
  • Robotic‐assisted approaches to urachal carcinoma: A comprehensive systematic review of the safety and efficacy outcomes
    Caio Vinícius Suartz, Lucas Motta Martinez, Pedro Henrique Brito, Carlos Victori Neto, Maurício Dener Cordeiro, Luiz Antonio Assan Botelho, Fábio Pescarmona Gallucci, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro‐Filho
    BJUI Compass.2024; 5(3): 327.     CrossRef
  • 4,030 View
  • 208 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Lung and Thoracic cancer
Diagnostic Performance of Endosonography to Detect Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Radiological N1 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Bo-Guen Kim, Jong Ho Cho, Sun Hye Shin, Kyungjong Lee, Sang-Won Um, Hojoong Kim, Jhingook Kim, Young Mog Shim, Byeong-Ho Jeong
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(3):832-840.   Published online March 2, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1428
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Guidelines recommend that non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with suspected hilar lymph node (LN) metastases should undergo invasive mediastinal LN staging prior to surgical treatment via endosonography. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of endosonography for detecting occult mediastinal metastases (OMM) and determined the factors associated with OMM in NSCLC patients with radiological N1.
Materials and Methods
Patients with confirmed primary NSCLC with radiological N1 who underwent endosonography for nodal staging assessment from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
The prevalence of OMM was found to be 83/279 (29.7%) and only 38.6% (32/83) were diagnosed via endosonography. However, five of them were confirmed as N3 by endosonography. The overall diagnostic sensitivity, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve of endosonography were 38.6%, 79.4%, 81.7%, and 0.69, respectively. In multivariable analysis, central tumor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 3.68; p=0.016), solid tumor (aOR, 10.24; 95% CI, 1.32 to 79.49; p=0.026), and adenocarcinoma (aOR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.63 to 5.55; p < 0.001) were related to OMM in radiological N1 NSCLC patients.
Conclusion
Although the sensitivity of endosonography for detecting OMM was only 40%, the prevalence of OMM was not low (30%) and some cases even turned out to be N3 diseases. Clinicians should be aware that OMM may be more likely in patients with central, solid, and adenocarcinomatous tumor when performing nodal staging in radiological N1 NSCLC via endosonography.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Incorporating Lymph Node Size at CT as an N1 Descriptor in Clinical N Staging for Lung Cancer
    Yura Ahn, Sang Min Lee, Jooae Choe, Se Hoon Choi, Kyung-Hyun Do, Joon Beom Seo
    Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and Risk Factors for Pathologic N2 Disease in Resected Lung Cancers Assessed as N0 or N1 Disease on Preoperative Imaging
    Yura Ahn, Sang Min Lee, Jooae Choe, Sehoon Choi, Kyung-Hyun Do, Joon Beom Seo
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • EBUS‐TBNA for mediastinal staging of centrally located T1N0M0 non‐small cell lung cancer clinically staged with PET/CT
    Pere Serra Mitjà, Bruno García‐Cabo, Ignasi Garcia‐Olivé, Joaquim Radua, Ramón Rami‐Porta, Lluís Esteban, Bienvenido Barreiro, Sergi Call, Carmen Centeno, Felipe Andreo, Carme Obiols, Juan Manuel Ochoa, Mireia Martínez‐Palau, Nina Reig, Mireia Serra, José
    Respirology.2024; 29(2): 158.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effect of Endosonography on Overall Survival in Patients with Radiological N1 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Bo-Guen Kim, Byeong-Ho Jeong, Goeun Park, Hong Kwan Kim, Young Mog Shim, Sun Hye Shin, Kyungjong Lee, Sang-Won Um, Hojoong Kim, Jong Ho Cho
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(2): 502.     CrossRef
  • Clinical utility of artificial intelligence–augmented endobronchial ultrasound elastography in lymph node staging for lung cancer
    Yogita S. Patel, Anthony A. Gatti, Forough Farrokhyar, Feng Xie, Waël C. Hanna
    JTCVS Techniques.2024; 27: 158.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Can Predict Lymph Node Malignancy from Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Images for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Yogita S. Patel, Anthony A. Gatti, Forough Farrokhyar, Feng Xie, Waël C. Hanna
    Respiration.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • 3,767 View
  • 128 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Gastrointestinal Cancer
Effect of Preoperative Tumor Under-Staging on the Long-term Survival of Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Mi Lin, Qi-Yue Chen, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Chang-Ming Huang
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(4):1123-1133.   Published online March 5, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.651
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative tumor staging deviation (PTSD) on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (RGGC).
Materials and Methods
Clinicopathological data of 2,346 patients who underwent RGGC were retrospectively analyzed. The preoperative tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) under-staging group (uTNM) comprised patients who had earlier preoperative TNM than postoperative TNM, and the no preoperative under-staging group (nTNM) comprised the remaining patients.
Results
There were 1,031 uTNM (44.0%) and 1,315 nTNM cases (56.0%). Cox prognostic analysis revealed that PTSD independently affected the overall survival (OS) after surgery. The 5-year OS was lower in the uTNM group (41.8%) than in the nTNM group (71.6%). The patients less than 65 years old, with lower American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, 2-5 cm tumor located at the lower stomach, and cT1 or cN0 preoperative staging would more likely undergo D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) in uTNM (p < 0.05). Logistic analyses revealed that tumor size > 2 cm and body mass index ≤ 22.72 kg/m2 were independent risk factors of preoperative TNM tumor under-staging in patients with cT1N0M0 staging (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Underestimated tumor staging is not rare, which possibly results in inadequate LND and affects the long-term survival for patients undergoing RGGC. D2 LND should be carefully performed in patients who are predisposed to this underestimation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • PREOPERATIVE PREDICTION OF WALL INVASION DEPTH OF PRIMARY TUMOR (PT) IN GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS
    M.YU. REUTOVICH, O.V. KRASKO, A.I. PATSEIKA, H.S. HUSSEIN
    AVICENNA BULLETIN.2025; 27(2): 327.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative prediction of gastric cancer T-staging based on ordinal regression models
    O. V. Krasko, M. Yu. Reutovich, A. L. Patseika
    Informatics.2024; 21(2): 36.     CrossRef
  • rhG-CSF is associated with an increased risk of metastasis in NSCLC patients following postoperative chemotherapy
    Yong Wang, Chen Fang, Renfang Chen, Shangkun Yuan, Lin Chen, Xiaotong Qiu, Xiaoying Qian, Xinwei Zhang, Zhehao Xiao, Qian Wang, Biqi Fu, Xiaoling Song, Yong Li
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors of Organizing Surgical Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers and Patient Survival: Real-World Data
    D. A. Andreev, A. A. Zavyalov
    Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology.2022; 32(6): 20.     CrossRef
  • 6,493 View
  • 87 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
Soo Young Jeong, Hyea Park, Myeong Seon Kim, Jun Hyeok Kang, E Sun Paik, Yoo-Young Lee, Tae Joong Kim, Jeong Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk Soo Bae, Chel Hun Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):516-523.   Published online October 29, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status.
Materials and Methods
Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion).
Results
A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage.
Conclusion
In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis in colon cancer: development and validation of an online dynamic nomogram based on multiple preoperative data
    Longlian Deng, Lemuge Che, Haibin Sun, Riletu En, Bowen Ha, Tao Liu, Tengqi Wang, Qiang Xu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Complete remission of a high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastases treated with first-line tislelizumab plus bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with maintenance therapy: a case report
    Juan Lang, Qianqian Liu, Rong Ji, Miao Qiu, Siben Wang, Qingmeng Liu, Dapeng Li, Ping Chen, Zhongkui Xiong
    Frontiers in Immunology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of CT in predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer and construction of a preoperative nomogram
    Xiao Meng, Siyu Song, Ke Li, Yajie Duan, Jiayuan Zhong, Jiawei Wang, Shichao Han
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer due to oxidative stress
    Amir Asotić, Memić Asotić, Muhamed Memić, Kerim Asotić, Amra Asotić
    Sanamed.2024; 19(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Investigating and Analyzing Prognostic Factors and Their Impact on Recurrent Cervical Cancers
    Ashish Uke, Shweta B Dahake, Anurag Luharia, Monika Luharia, Gaurav V Mishra, Chanrashekhar Mahakalkar
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Based on 3D-PDU and clinical characteristics nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastasis and lymph-vascular space invasion of early cervical cancer preoperatively
    Shuang Dong, Yan-Qing Peng, Ya-Nan Feng, Xiao-Ying Li, Li-Ping Gong, Shuang Zhang, Xiao-Shan Du, Li-Tao Sun
    BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in Cervical Cancer Management: A Review on Novel Prognostic Factors in Primary and Recurrent Tumors
    Angela Santoro, Frediano Inzani, Giuseppe Angelico, Damiano Arciuolo, Emma Bragantini, Antonio Travaglino, Michele Valente, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Giulia Scaglione, Stefania Sfregola, Alessia Piermattei, Federica Cianfrini, Paola Roberti, Gian Franco Za
    Cancers.2023; 15(4): 1137.     CrossRef
  • Identification of lymph node metastasis in pre‐operation cervical cancer patients by weakly supervised deep learning from histopathological whole‐slide biopsy images
    Qingqing Liu, Nan Jiang, Yiping Hao, Chunyan Hao, Wei Wang, Tingting Bian, Xiaohong Wang, Hua Li, Yan zhang, Yanjun Kang, Fengxiang Xie, Yawen Li, XuJi Jiang, Yuan Feng, Zhonghao Mao, Qi Wang, Qun Gao, Wenjing Zhang, Baoxia Cui, Taotao Dong
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(17): 17952.     CrossRef
  • Roles of DWI and T2-weighted MRI volumetry in the evaluation of lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion of stage IB–IIA cervical cancer
    Y. Wang, X. Chen, H. Pu, Y. Yuan, S. Li, G. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Li
    Clinical Radiology.2022; 77(3): 224.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer
    Mu Xu, Xiaoyan Xie, Liangzhi Cai, Yongjin Xie, Qiao Gao, Pengming Sun
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Miriam Dolciami, Silvia Capuani, Veronica Celli, Alessandra Maiuro, Angelina Pernazza, Innocenza Palaia, Violante Di Donato, Giusi Santangelo, Stefania Maria Rita Rizzo, Paolo Ricci, Carlo Della Rocca, Carlo Catalano, Lucia Manganaro
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(4): 638.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic significance of pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy and a comparison of dosimetric outcomes and clinical toxicities between tomotherapy and volumetric
    Yuan-Kai Cheng, Shih-Hsun Kuo, Heng-Hsuan Yen, Jing-Hu Wu, Yu-Chieh Chen, Ming-Yii Huang
    Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What MRI-based tumor size measurement is best for predicting long-term survival in uterine cervical cancer?
    Njål Lura, Kari S. Wagner-Larsen, David Forsse, Jone Trovik, Mari K. Halle, Bjørn I. Bertelsen, Øyvind Salvesen, Kathrine Woie, Camilla Krakstad, Ingfrid S. Haldorsen
    Insights into Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical value of MRI, serum SCCA, and CA125 levels in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis and para-uterine infiltration in cervical cancer
    Chao Ran, Jian Sun, Yunhui Qu, Na Long
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel Four-Gene Prognostic Signature as a Risk Biomarker in Cervical Cancer
    Jun Wang, Hua Zheng, Yatian Han, Geng Wang, Yanbin Li, Cuida Meng
    International Journal of Genomics.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • 10,878 View
  • 226 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
Close layer
Validation of the 8th AJCC Cancer Staging System for Pancreas Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Korean Nationwide Surgery Database
Yunghun You, Jin-Young Jang, Song Cheol Kim, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Chol Kyoon Cho, Sang-Jae Park, Jae Do Yang, Woo Jung Lee, Tae Ho Hong, Keun Soo Ahn, Chi-Young Jeong, Hyeon Kook Lee, Seung Eun Lee, Young Hoon Roh, Hee Joon Kim, Hongbeom Kim, In Woong Han
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1639-1652.   Published online April 19, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.023
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) included several significant changes. We aim to evaluate this staging system compared to the 7th edition AJCC staging system and European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) system.
Materials and Methods
We used Korean nationwide surgery database (2000-2014). Of 972 patients who had undergone surgery for PNET, excluding patients diagnosed with ENETS/World Health Organization 2010 grade 3 (G3), only 472 patients with accurate stage were included.
Results
Poor discrimination in overall survival rate (OSR) was noted between AJCC 8th stage III and IV (p=0.180). The disease-free survival (DFS) curves of 8th AJCC classification were well separated between all stages. Compared with stage I, the hazard ratio of II, III, and IV was 3.808, 13.928, and 30.618, respectively (p=0.007, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The curves of OSR and DFS of certain prognostic group in AJCC 7th and ENETS overlapped. In ENETS staging system, no significant difference in DFS between stage IIB versus IIIA (p=0.909) and IIIA versus IIIB (p=0.291). In multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002), perineural invasion (p=0.003), and grade (p < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for DFS.
Conclusion
This is the first large-scale validation of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for PNET. The revised 8th system provides better discrimination compared to that of the 7th edition and ENETS TNM system. This supports the clinical use of the system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imaging Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Eric Rupe, Mahmoud Diab, LeeAnn Xoubi, Noha Kabeel, Ajaykumar Morani, Albert Klekers, Priya Bhosale
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2025; 60(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs): Genetic and environmental biomarkers for risk of occurrence and prognosis
    Matteo Tacelli, Manuel Gentiluomo, Paolo Biamonte, Justo P. Castano, Maja Cigrovski Berković, Mauro Cives, Sanja Kapitanović, Ilaria Marinoni, Sonja Marinovic, Ilias Nikas, Lenka Nosáková, Sergio Pedraza-Arevalo, Eleonora Pellè, Aurel Perren, Jonathan Str
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2025; 112: 112.     CrossRef
  • Validation of a Pretrained Artificial Intelligence Model for Pancreatic Cancer Detection on Diagnosis and Prediagnosis Computed Tomography Scans
    Laura Degand, Clément Abi-Nader, Alexandre Bône, Rebeca Vetil, Davide Placido, Piotr Chmura, Marc-Michel Rohé, Federico De Masi, Søren Brunak
    Investigative Radiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of CT-based radiomics in grade 1–2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Subin Heo, Hyo Jung Park, Hyoung Jung Kim, Jung Hoon Kim, Seo Young Park, Kyung Won Kim, So Yeon Kim, Sang Hyun Choi, Jae Ho Byun, Song Cheol Kim, Hee Sang Hwang, Seung Mo Hong
    Cancer Imaging.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Contemporary Approaches to the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Akash Kartik, Valerie L. Armstrong, Chee-Chee Stucky, Nabil Wasif, Zhi Ven Fong
    Cancers.2024; 16(8): 1501.     CrossRef
  • Optimal surgical management of unifocal vs. multifocal NF-PNETs: a respective cohort study
    Juwan Kim, Seung Soo Hong, Sung Hyun Kim, Ho Kyong Hwang, Chang Moo Kang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NON-FUNCTIONING SPORADIC PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR IS AN INDEPENDENT RISK FACTOR FOR RECURRENCE AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT
    Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, André Luis Montagnini, Jessica Okubo, Ana Gabriela Vivarelli Fernandes, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Paulo Herman, José Jukemura
    ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Venous invasion and lymphatic invasion are correlated with the postoperative prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm
    Sho Kiritani, Junichi Arita, Yuichiro Mihara, Rihito Nagata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Takeaki Ishizawa, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Junichi Kaneko, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
    Surgery.2023; 173(2): 365.     CrossRef
  • Impact of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on Staging and Therapeutic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors
    Aleksander Kosmala, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Thomas Lindner, Kerstin Michalski, Andreas Schirbel, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas K. Buck, Alexander Weich, Rudolf A. Werner
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence and outcomes of non‐functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours post‐resection: an Australian retrospective, multicentre cohort study
    Sean Lim, Lynn Chong, Saania Peeroo, Olukunle Onasanya, Evelyn He, Simon Banting, Daniel Croagh
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(1-2): 160.     CrossRef
  • Validation of a supplementary condition of eighth AJCC staging system for stage II hepatocellular carcinoma
    Min Li, Linquan Wu, Shuaiwu Luo, Yaran Liu, Chi Sun, Enliang Li, Jiakun Wang, Bowen Li, Zhihao Huang, Jin Ge, Jun Lei, Fan Zhou, Wenjun Liao
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(7): 1217.     CrossRef
  • A population-based nomogram to individualize treatment modality for pancreatic cancer patients underlying surgery
    Xiao-Ya Shi, Yan Wang, Xuan Zhou, Meng-Li Xie, Qian Ma, Gan-Xin Wang, Jing Zhan, Yi-Ming Shao, Bai Wei
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of CXCR4-Directed PET/CT on Staging and Proposed Oncologic Management in Patients With Digestive System Tumors
    Alexander Weich, Sebastian E. Serfling, Wiebke Schlötelburg, Takahiro Higuchi, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas Schirbel, Marieke Heinrich, Andreas K. Buck, Steven P. Rowe, Aleksander Kosmala, Rudolf A. Werner
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(7): 586.     CrossRef
  • Lifestyle, clinical and histological indices-based prediction models for survival in cancer patients: a city-wide prospective cohort study in China
    Ce Sun, Huan Xu, Suixiang Wang, Ke Li, Pengzhe Qin, Boheng Liang, Lin Xu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(12): 9965.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Approach Using [18F]FDG PET-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
    Yong-Jin Park, Young Suk Park, Seung Tae Kim, Seung Hyup Hyun
    Molecular Imaging and Biology.2023; 25(5): 897.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic validity of the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition staging system for well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Hebin Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hang Zhang, Jun Liu, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Feng Peng, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu, Jikuan Jin, Yi Wu, Abu
    HPB.2022; 24(5): 681.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using data from the KOTUS-BP national database: overcoming selection bias and the necessity of definite indications
    Hongbeom Kim, Jin Seok Heo, Chang Moo Kang, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Joon Seong Park, Sung-Sik Han, Yong Hoon Kim, Hyeon Kook Lee, Young-Dong Yu, In Seok Choi, Jae Do Yang, Younghoon Roh, Seong-Ryong Kim, Junchul Chung, Sang Hwa Song,
    HPB.2022; 24(10): 1804.     CrossRef
  • Fate of Surgical Patients with Small Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An International Study Using Multi-Institutional Registries
    In Woong Han, Jangho Park, Eun Young Park, So Jeong Yoon, Gang Jin, Dae Wook Hwang, Kuirong Jiang, Wooil Kwon, Xuefeng Xu, Jin Seok Heo, De-Liang Fu, Woo Jung Lee, Xueli Bai, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Yin-Mo Yang, Keun Soo Ahn, Chunhui Yuan, Hyeon Kook Lee, Bei Sun,
    Cancers.2022; 14(4): 1038.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Modified Eighth AJCC Staging System for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Xu-Feng Zhang, Feng Xue, Zheng Wu, Alexandra G. Lopez-Aguiar, George Poultsides, Eleftherios Makris, Flavio Rocha, Zaheer Kanji, Sharon Weber, Alexander Fisher, Ryan Fields, Bradley A. Krasnick, Kamran Idrees, Paula M. Smith, Cliff Cho, Megan Beems, Yi Ly
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 275(6): e773.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center
    Sara Coelho, Cláudia Costa, Ana Paula Santos, Pedro Souteiro, Joana Oliveira, Júlio Oliveira, Isabel Azevedo, Isabel Torres, Maria José Bento
    Endocrine Oncology.2022; 2(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes, Long-Term Survivals and Staging Systems of World Health Organization G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Min Yang, Lin Zeng, Shengzhong Hou, Bole Tian, Shuguang Jin, Yi Zhang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(18): 5253.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Periampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Database Analysis
    Jinghua Chen, Qichen Chen, Yiqiao Deng, Yujuan Jiang, Zhen Huang, Jianguo Zhou, Hong Zhao, Jianqiang Cai
    Current Oncology.2022; 30(1): 344.     CrossRef
  • Clinical value of 68Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET/CT in the diagnosis and detection of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huan Ma, Ying Kan, Ji-gang Yang
    Acta Radiologica.2021; 62(9): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Strategy Based on Radiological 3D Reconstruction in a Giant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Pancreas: A Case Report of an Interdisciplinary Approach
    Gabriel Fridolin Hess, Savas Deniz Soysal, Guillaume Nicolas, Martin Bolli, Christoph Johannes Zech, Alexandar Tzankov, Emanuel Christ, Michael Montemurro, Otto Kollmar, Tahsin Colak
    Case Reports in Surgery.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of extracellular volume fraction with equilibrium contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Hiromichi Iwaya, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Shinichi Hashimoto, Shiroh Tanoue, Machiko Kawahira, Makoto Hinokuchi, Toshihiro Fujita, Yuga Komaki, Shiho Arima, Fumisato Sasaki, Shuji Kanmura, Michiyo Higashi, Kiichi Tamada, Akio Ido
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(4): 779.     CrossRef
  • The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update
    Xiaoyan Liao, Dongwei Zhang
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2021; 145(5): 543.     CrossRef
  • Insights of Outcome after Resection of Small Nonfunctioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors
    Estela Regina Ramos Figueira, Julia Fray Ribeiro, Thiago Costa Ribeiro, Ricardo Jureidini, Guilherme Naccache Namur, Thiago Nogueira Costa, Telesforo Bacchella, Ivan Cecconello, Jose Celso Ardengh
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • New staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms combining TNM stage and WHO grade classification [ ]
    Min Wang, Ding Ding, Tingting Qin, Hebin Wang, Yahui Liu, Jianhua Liu, Jun Liu, Hang Zhang, Junfang Zhao, Chien-Hui Wu, Ammar Javed, Christopher Wolfgang, Shiwei Guo, Qingmin Chen, Weihong Zhao, Wei Shi, Feng Zhu, Xingjun Guo, Xu Li, Ruizhi He, Simiao Xu,
    Cancer Letters.2021; 518: 207.     CrossRef
  • Ampullary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insight into a Rare Histology
    Samantha M. Ruff, Oliver Standring, Grace Wu, Anna Levy, Sandeep Anantha, Elliot Newman, Martin S. Karpeh, William Nealon, Gary B. Deutsch, Matthew J. Weiss, Danielle K. DePeralta
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(13): 8318.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A review of serum biomarkers, staging, and management
    Zu-Yi Ma, Yuan-Feng Gong, Hong-Kai Zhuang, Zi-Xuan Zhou, Shan-Zhou Huang, Yi-Ping Zou, Bo-Wen Huang, Zhong-Hai Sun, Chuan-Zhao Zhang, Yun-Qiang Tang, Bao-Hua Hou
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(19): 2305.     CrossRef
  • Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Hong-Yu Chen, Ya-Liang Zhou, Yong-Hua Chen, Xing Wang, Hao Zhang, Neng-Wen Ke, Xu-Bao Liu, Chun-Lu Tan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(25): 3638.     CrossRef
  • Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification
    Lokesh Khanna, Srinivasa R. Prasad, Abhijit Sunnapwar, Sainath Kondapaneni, Anil Dasyam, Varaha S. Tammisetti, Umber Salman, Alia Nazarullah, Venkata S. Katabathina
    RadioGraphics.2020; 40(5): 1240.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Ashley L. Titan, Jeffrey A. Norton, Andrea T. Fisher, Deshka S. Foster, E. John Harris, David J. Worhunsky, Patrick J. Worth, Monica M. Dua, Brendan C. Visser, George A. Poultsides, Michael T. Longaker, Robert T. Jensen
    JAMA Network Open.2020; 3(11): e2024318.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies
    Lingaku Lee, Tetsuhide Ito, Robert T Jensen
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2019; 19(12): 1029.     CrossRef
  • 10,922 View
  • 255 Download
  • 35 Web of Science
  • 34 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Value and Staging Classification of Lymph Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Yanru Feng, Caineng Cao, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1222-1230.   Published online December 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.595
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‒determined lymph nodal necrosis (LNN) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and explore the feasibility of an N-classification system based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system.
Materials and Methods
The MRI scans of 616 patients with newly diagnosed stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC who were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were reviewed.
Results
Multivariate analysis showed that LNN was an independent negative prognostic predictor of distant metastasis free survival (hazard ratio, 1.634; 95% confidence interval, 1.023 to 2.609; p=0.040) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.154; 95% confidence interval, 1.282 to 3.620; p=0.004). Patients of classification N1 disease with LNN were reclassified as classification N2, and classification N2 disease with LNN as classification N3 in the proposed N-classification system. Correlation with death and distant failure was significant, and the total difference between N1 and N3 was wider with the proposed system.
Conclusion
MRI-determined LNN is an independent negative prognostic factor for NPC. The proposed N classification system is powerfully predictive.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identifying adverse nodal features associated with poor prognosis in stage IB nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on the 9th AJCC/UICC staging system: Implications for treatment intensification
    Jing Zhong, Hongye Chen, Xinlan Chen, Ning Ma, Yuan Huang, Shaojun Lin, Jianji Pan, Yunbin Chen, Tianzhu Lu, Youping Xiao, Peng Shi, Hanchuan Xu, Qiaojuan Guo
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2025; 205: 110747.     CrossRef
  • Advanced image-identified extranodal extension of retropharyngeal lymph nodes in the refinement of N classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wei Jiang, Gao-Yuan Wang, Guan-Jie Qin, Wu-Qi Zhang, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Ya-Qian Han, Feng Lei, Liang-Fang Shen, Kun-Yu Yang, Chun-Yan Cui, Ling-Long Tang, Yan-Ping Mao, Lei Chen, Rui Guo, Ling Li, Zheng Wu, Gui-Qiong Xu, Qin Zhou, Jing Huang, Shao-Hui Huang,
    Cell Reports Medicine.2025; 6(2): 101942.     CrossRef
  • Advances in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging: from the 7th to the 9th Edition of the TNM System and Future Outlook
    Binhao Wu, Xiaozhong Chen, Caineng Cao
    Current Oncology Reports.2025; 27(3): 322.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on the Different Grades of Cervical Lymph Node Necrosis to Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Run-Zhi Wang, Li-Ru Zhu, Yao-Can Xu, Mei-Wen Chen, Zhong-Guo Liang, Kai-Hua Chen, Ling Li, Xiao-Dong Zhu
    Academic Radiology.2025; 32(6): 3647.     CrossRef
  • Matted Lymph Nodes on MRI in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Prognostic Factor and Potential Indication for Induction Chemotherapy Benefits
    Annan Dong, Siyu Zhu, Huali Ma, Xiaoyu Wei, Wenjie Huang, Guangying Ruan, Lizhi Liu, Yunxian Mo, Fei Ai
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 59(6): 1976.     CrossRef
  • Statistical and machine learning methods for cancer research and clinical practice: A systematic review
    Laura Lopez-Perez, Eleni Georga, Carlo Conti, Victor Vicente, Rebeca García, Leandro Pecchia, Dimitris Fotiadis, Lisa Licitra, Maria Fernanda Cabrera, Maria Teresa Arredondo, Giuseppe Fico
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control.2024; 92: 106067.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Value of Serum Sialic Acid in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    Zetan Chen, Gang Wu, Xiangying Lin, Xiaopeng Huang, Shuai Zhang, Kaihua Chen, Zhongguo Liang, Xiaodong Zhu
    Cancer Management and Research.2024; Volume 16: 215.     CrossRef
  • A prognostic nomogram incorporating tumor size and lymph node size for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Qi Yi, Jiazuo Cai, Yunen Lin, Zimei Hu, Jie Lin, Zhong Huang, Wei Liu, Ronghui Zheng, YaWei Yuan, Chengcong Chen
    American Journal of Otolaryngology.2023; 44(2): 103717.     CrossRef
  • Intra- and peritumoral MRI radiomics assisted in predicting radiochemotherapy response in metastatic cervical lymph nodes of nasopharyngeal cancer
    Hao Xu, Ai Wang, Chi Zhang, Jing Ren, Peng Zhou, Jieke Liu
    BMC Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Construction of Prognostic Nomogram in Patients with N3-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Wenmiao Cao, Xiaoxin Li, Jianqi Yang, Enming Xing, Wenjuan Wu, Yizhi Ge, Buhai Wang
    ORL.2023; 85(4): 195.     CrossRef
  • Detection and staging of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of FDG PET/MR
    Yongfeng Piao, Caineng Cao, Yuanfan Xu, Shuang Huang, Feng Jiang, Ting Jin, Qifeng Jin, Yonghong Hua, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2022; 279(1): 353.     CrossRef
  • A nonendemic analysis of the patterns and prognosis of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomas in older patients aged ≥ 65 years
    Baoqiu Liu, Mingxing Zhang, Yanqing Cao, Zhe Wang, Xicheng Wang
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of cervical nodal necrosis on staging imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi-Yong H. Ai, Kuo Feng Hung, Tiffany Y. So, Frankie K. F. Mo, Wing Tsung Anthony Chin, Edwin P. Hui, Brigette B. Y. Ma, Michael Ying, Ann D. King
    Cancer Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus Endostar compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study
    Yuanxiu Yin, Ziyan Zhou, Zhiru Li, Mingjun Shen, Yating Qin, Chaolin Yang, Rensheng Wang, Min Kang
    Radiation Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • FMISO-Based Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Martin Dolezel, Marek Slavik, Tomas Blazek, Tomas Kazda, Pavel Koranda, Lucia Veverkova, Petr Burkon, Jakub Cvek
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(8): 1245.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of the cervical lymph node necrosis ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Ying Bin, Zhen Meng, Lu-Lu Huang, Xue-Ying Hu, Jun-Mei Song, Yi-Ting Xie, Min Kang, Ren-Sheng Wang
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2022; 177: 185.     CrossRef
  • Influence of tumor necrosis on treatment sensitivity and long-term survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Shao-Bo Liang, Lu-Si Chen, Xing-Li Yang, Dan-Ming Chen, Dong-Hui Wang, Chun-Yan Cui, Chuan-Bo Xie, Li-Zhi Liu, Xiang-Ying Xu
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2021; 155: 219.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram to predict overall survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis
    Wanpeng Li, Hanyu Lu, Huan Wang, Li Hu, Xicai Sun, Hongmeng Yu, Dehui Wang
    Head & Neck.2021; 43(8): 2353.     CrossRef
  • Contemporary management of the neck in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wai Tong Ng, Raymond K. Y. Tsang, Jonathan J. Beitler, Remco de Bree, Andrés Coca‐Pelaz, Avraham Eisbruch, Orlando Guntinas‐Lichius, Anne W. M. Lee, Antti A. Mäkitie, William M. Mendenhall, Sandra Nuyts, Alessandra Rinaldo, K. Thomas Robbins, Juan P. Rodr
    Head & Neck.2021; 43(6): 1949.     CrossRef
  • MRI-based radiomics as response predictor to radiochemotherapy for metastatic cervical lymph node in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Hao Xu, Jieke Liu, Ying Huang, Peng Zhou, Jing Ren
    The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term survival outcomes and adverse effects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT in a non-endemic region: a population-based retrospective study
    Man Xu, Jian Zang, Shanquan Luo, Jianhua Wang, Xuqi Li
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(8): e045417.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with N3 disease
    Xiaoshuang Niu, Fen Xue, Peiyao Liu, Chaosu Hu, Xiayun He
    Translational Oncology.2021; 14(12): 101216.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value and the potential role of treatment options for cervical lymph node necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Kuiyuan Liu, Siting Lin, Liangru Ke, Weixiong Xia, Chun Zhang, Jianpeng Li, Mingyong Gao, Mengyun Qiang, Xi Chen, Jia Liu, Chuanmiao Xie, Xiang Guo, Xing Lv
    Oral Oncology.2020; 109: 104864.     CrossRef
  • The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions
    Si-Qi Tang, Yan-Ping Mao, Cheng Xu, Rui Guo, Wen-Fei Li, Ling-Long Tang, Ying Sun, Jun Ma
    Chinese Medical Journal.2020; 133(17): 2044.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and Treatment Guiding Significance of MRI-Based Tumor Burden Features and Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Xi Chen, Xun Cao, Bingzhong Jing, Weixiong Xia, Liangru Ke, Yanqun Xiang, Kuiyuan Liu, Mengyun Qiang, Chixiong Liang, Jianpeng Li, Mingyong Gao, Wangzhong Li, Jingjing Miao, Guoying Liu, Zhuochen Cai, Shuhui Lv, Xiang Guo, Chaofeng Li, Xing Lv
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patterns and Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis on Distant Metastasis and Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study, 2006–2015
    Yali Xu, Taoyuan Huang, Liqin Fan, Wei Jin, Xiaoming Chen, Jinhai Chen
    Journal of Oncology.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Screening of key miRNAs and evaluation of their diagnostic and prognostic values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Xianlu Zhuo, Wei Zhou, Huiping Ye, Dairong Li, Aoshuang Chang, Yongzhong Wu, Qi Zhou
    Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,718 View
  • 171 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of the 7th and the 8th AJCC Staging System for Non-metastatic D2-Resected Lymph Node–Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Different Adjuvant Protocols
Jeong Il Yu, Do Hoon Lim, Jeeyun Lee, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Seung Tae Kim, Su Jin Lee, Sung Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Heejin Yoo, Kyunga Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):876-885.   Published online October 1, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.401
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare prognostic differentiation performances of the 7th and the 8th edition of American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1,633 GC patients who underwent curative D2 resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone (CA) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) from 2004 to 2013 were included. Concordance index (c-index) was applied to compare the discriminatory ability.
Results
In the 8th edition, migration of stage was detected in 248 patients (15.2%). Among them, 121 patients were up-staged while 127 patients were down-staged. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the discriminatory ability between the 7th and 8th editions. The new edition of staging system, however, showed a trend of better prognostic performance not only in recurrence-free survival (c-index=0.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.762 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.740; 95% CI, 0.712 to 0.768 in the 8th edition; p=0.14), but also in overall survival (c-index=0.717; 95% CI, 0.688 to 0.745 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.722; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.751 in the 8th edition; p=0.19), especially in stage III. This finding was repeated in the subgroup analysis regardless of adjuvant CA or CCRT.
Conclusion
Generally, the 8th edition of AJCC staging system had failed to show a superior discriminatory ability for curatively D2 resected GC patients than the 7th edition, although there was a trend of better prognostic performance of the new edition, regardless of adjuvant treatment method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3
    Hongyu Zhang, Nan Sun, Feng Li, Qiyang Wang, Zhao Sun, Yawei Zhang, Lei Wang, Chunlin Zhao, Yang Fu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An analysis of the relationship of triglyceride glucose index with gastric cancer prognosis: A retrospective study
    Chao Cai, Cheng Chen, Xiuli Lin, Huihui Zhang, Mingming Shi, Xiaolei Chen, Weisheng Chen, Didi Chen
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pathologic N classification system
    Kailai Yin, Xuanhong Jin, Yang Pan, Mengli Zi, Yingsong Zheng, Yubo Ma, Chuhong Pang, Kang liu, Jinxia Chen, Yizhou Wei, Dujiang Liu, Xiangdong Cheng, Li Yuan
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(8): 1283.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma
    Styliani Mantziari, Penelope St Amour, Francesco Abboretti, Hugo Teixeira-Farinha, Sergio Gaspar Figueiredo, Caroline Gronnier, Dimitrios Schizas, Nicolas Demartines, Markus Schäfer
    Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1628.     CrossRef
  • Normalization weighted combination scores re-evaluate TNM staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database
    Junpeng Wu, Hao Wang, Xin Yin, Yufei Wang, Zhanfei Lu, Jiaqi Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yingwei Xue
    International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Substage Increase in The AJCC Classification System Improves Prognostic Prediction in Stage III Gastric Cancer With Insufficient Lymph Nodes Removed
    Ri-Sheng Zhao, Yi-Nan Liu, Wei-Gang Dai, Si-Le Chen, Jin-Ning Ye, Er-Tao Zhai, Shi-Rong Cai, Jian-Hui Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current therapeutic options for gastric adenocarcinoma
    C.R. Akshatha, Smitha Bhat, R. Sindhu, Dharini Shashank, Sarana Rose Sommano, Wanaporn Tapingkae, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Shashanka K. Prasad
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021; 28(9): 5371.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Mesenchymal and Non-Mesenchymal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer
    Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park, Jeeyun Lee, Changhoon Choi, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Seung Tae Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Heewon Han, Kyunga Kim, Sung Kim, Do Hoon Lim
    Cancers.2020; 12(4): 943.     CrossRef
  • 12,038 View
  • 232 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Validation of the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma
Sun-Young Jun, You-Na Sung, Jae Hoon Lee, Kwang-Min Park, Young-Joo Lee, Seung-Mo Hong
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):98-111.   Published online March 2, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.595
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
T category of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal bile duct carcinoma (DBDC) was changed to include tumor invasion depth measurement, while the N category adopted a 3-tier classification system based on the number of metastatic nodes.
Materials and Methods
To validate cancer staging, a total of 200 surgically resected DBDCs were staged and compared according to the seventh and eighth editions.
Results
T categories included T1 (n=37, 18.5%), T2 (n=114, 57.0%), and T3 (n=49, 24.5%). N categories included N0 (n=133, 66.5%), N1 (n=50, 25.0%), and N2 (n=17, 8.5%). Stage groupings included I (n=33, 16.5%), II (n=150, 75.0%), and III (n=17, 8.5%). The overall 5-year survival rates (5-YSRs) of T1, T2, and T3 were 59.3%, 42.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. T category could discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (T1 and T2, p=0.011; T2 and T3, p < 0.001) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of N0, N1, and N2 were 47.3%, 17.0%, and 14.7%, respectively. N category could partly discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (N0 and N1, p < 0.001; N1 and N2, p=0.579) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of stages I, II, and III were 59.0%, 35.4%, and 14.7%, respectively. Stages could distinguish patient survival by both pairwise (I and II, p=0.002; II and III, p=0.015) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. On multivariate analyses, T and N categories (p=0.014 and p=0.029) and pancreatic invasion (p=0.006) remained significant prognostic factors.
Conclusion
The T andNcategories of the eighth edition AJCC staging system for DBDC accurately predict patient prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival outcome of patient with pT1N0 biliary tract cancer treated with surgery alone
    Masaaki Kagoura, Shin Kobayashi, Motohiro Kojima, Masashi Kudo, Motokazu Sugimoto, Masaru Konishi, Naoto Gotohda
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(3): 107980.     CrossRef
  • Effect of MELD-Na score on overall survival of periampullary cancer
    Serkan Yılmaz, Mesut Yur
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(5): 1819.     CrossRef
  • Subdivision of pT1N0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition) distal cholangiocarcinoma for adjuvant chemotherapy consideration
    Shimpei Otsuka, Teiichi Sugiura, Ryo Ashida, Katsuhisa Ohgi, Mihoko Yamada, Yoshiyasu Kato, Kageyama Yumiko, Nobuyuki Ohike, Takashi Sugino, Katsuhiko Uesaka
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2024; 31(8): 559.     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of pancreatic invasion in T1‐stage distal bile duct cancer and prognostic factors associated with long‐term survival: A multicenter study
    Ye Won Jeon, Chang Moo Kang, Yoo‐Seok Yoon, Wooil Kwon, Sung‐Sik Han, Yejong Park, Bong Jun Kwak, Woohyung Lee, Ki Byung Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Song Cheol Kim, Sang Hyun Shin, Dae Wook Hwang
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2024; 31(9): 658.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative prognostic stratification and prediction of long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma
    Tomotaka Kato, Katsuya Okada, Yasutaka Baba, Masanori Yasuda, Yuhei Ohshima, Kenichiro Takase, Yuichiro Watanabe, Yukihiro Watanabe, Masayasu Aikawa, Kojun Okamoto, Isamu Koyama
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(12): 108691.     CrossRef
  • Does Adjuvant Therapy Benefit Low-Risk Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma? An Evaluation of the NCCN Guidelines
    Muhammad Musaab Munir, Samantha M. Ruff, Yutaka Endo, Henrique A. Lima, Laura Alaimo, Zorays Moazzam, Chanza Shaikh, Timothy M. Pawlik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(3): 511.     CrossRef
  • Proposal for a new N-stage classification system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Shan Liao, Ruizhe Liao, Huaxing Wu, Shijie Wang, Yanming Zhou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retrospective analysis of 8th edition American Joint Cancer Classification: Distal cholangiocarcinoma
    Atish Darshan Bajracharya, Suniti Shrestha, Hyung Sun Kim, Ji Hae Nahm, Kwanhoon Park, Joon Seong Park
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2023; 27(3): 251.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Growth Pattern in Predicting Outcome of Opisthorchis viverrini-Associated Distal Cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand
    Waritta Kunprom, Chaiwat Aphivatanasiri, Prakasit Sa-ngiamwibool, Sakkarn Sangkhamanon, Piyapharom Intarawichian, Walailak Bamrungkit, Malinee Thanee, Piya Prajumwongs, Watcharin Loilome, Narong Khuntikeo, Attapol Titapun, Apiwat Jareanrat, Vasin Thanasuk
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The T Category of Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct Carcinoma
    Sun-Young Jun, Jae Hoon Shin, Jihyun Chun, Hyo Jeong Kang, Seung-Mo Hong
    American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2022; 46(7): 907.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous pancreatic cancer 18 years after resection of common bile duct cancer: A case report
    Seoung Hoon Kim
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The consistencies and inconsistencies between distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tian-Run Lv, Ju-Mei Wang, Wen-Jie Ma, Ya-Fei Hu, Yu-Shi Dai, Yan-Wen Jin, Fu-Yu Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in predicting outcome of distal cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand
    Piyapharom Intarawichian, Sirada Sangpaibool, Piya Prajumwongs, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Sakkarn Sangkhamanon, Waritta Kunprom, Malinee Thanee, Watcharin Loilome, Narong Khuntikeo, Attapol Titapun, Apiwat Jareanrat, Vasin Thanasukarn, Tharatip Srisuk, Vor
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of biliary malignancy
    T. Peter Kingham, Victoria G. Aveson, Alice C. Wei, Jason A. Castellanos, Peter J. Allen, Daniel P. Nussbaum, Yinin Hu, Michael I. D'Angelica
    Current Problems in Surgery.2021; 58(2): 100854.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors of Long-term Survival Following Radical Resection for Ampullary Carcinoma
    Daniel Weiss Vilhordo, Cleandra Gregório, Dirceu Felipe Valentini, Maria Isabel Albano Edelweiss, Diego Mendonça Uchoa, Alessandro Bersch Osvaldt
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(3): 872.     CrossRef
  • Intra-pancreatic distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a common short and long-term prognosis?
    Théophile Guilbaud, Edouard Girard, Coralie Lemoine, Ghislain Schlienger, Oyekashopefoluw Alao, Olivier Risse, Stéphane Berdah, Mircea Chirica, Vincent Moutardier, David Jérémie Birnbaum
    Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(2): 439.     CrossRef
  • The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update
    Xiaoyan Liao, Dongwei Zhang
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2021; 145(5): 543.     CrossRef
  • Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers
    Angela Lamarca, Julien Edeline, Mairéad G McNamara, Richard A Hubner, Masato Nagino, John Bridgewater, John Primrose, Juan W Valle
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2020; 84: 101936.     CrossRef
  • Validation of the T category for distal cholangiocarcinoma: Measuring the depth of invasion is complex but correlates with survival
    Joon Young Park, So Young Kim, Dong Hoon Shin, Kyung Un Choi, Jee Yeon Kim, Mee Young Sol, Hyun Jung Lee, Chungsu Hwang, Je Ho Ryu, Kwang Ho Yang, Tae Beom Lee, Jung Hee Lee
    Annals of Diagnostic Pathology.2020; 46: 151489.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological significance of olfactomedin-4 in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma
    Sun-Young Jun, Soyeon An, Tom Huh, Joon-Yong Chung, Seung-Mo Hong
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2020; 216(5): 152940.     CrossRef
  • Proposed Modification of Staging for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Based on the Lymph Node Ratio Using Korean Multicenter Database
    Yunghun You, Yong Chan Shin, Dong Wook Choi, Jin Seok Heo, Sang Hyun Shin, Naru Kim, Kee-Taek Jang, Hongbeom Kim, Chang-Sup Lim, Sun Hee Chang, Kang Min Han, In Woong Han
    Cancers.2020; 12(3): 762.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Significance of Gallbladder and Cystic Duct Invasion in Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma
    Sun-Young Jun, Soyeon An, You-Na Sung, Yejong Park, Jae Hoon Lee, Dae Wook Hwang, Seung-Mo Hong
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2020; 144(6): 755.     CrossRef
  • Validation Study of Tumor Invasive Thickness for Postoperative Prognosis in 110 Patients Who Underwent Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma at a Single Institution
    Yang Zhao, Yoshitsugu Nakanishi, Mariko Ogino, Mitsunobu Oba, Keisuke Okamura, Takahiro Tsuchikawa, Toru Nakamura, Takehiro Noji, Toshimichi Asano, Kimitaka Tanaka, Hayato Hosoi, Tomohide Nakayama, Tomoko Mitsuhashi, Chaoliu Dai, Satoshi Hirano
    American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2019; 43(5): 717.     CrossRef
  • Cholangiocarcinoma: classification and staging
    A. I. Shchegolev, U. N. Tumanova, G. G. Karmazanovsky, O. D. Mishnev
    Medical Visualization.2018; (5): 55.     CrossRef
  • 11,476 View
  • 294 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
Paranasal Sinus Invasion in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):73-79.   Published online February 26, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.607
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of paranasal sinus invasion for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its suitable position in the T classification.
Materials and Methods
The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 695 patients with previously untreated, biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC that was treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were reviewed retrospectively.
Results
The incidence of paranasal sinus invasion was 39.4% (274 of 695 patients). Multivariate analysis showed that paranasal sinus invasion was an independent negative prognostic factor for local failure-free survival (LFFS) (p < 0.05). According to the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, 275 patients were classified as T3 classification. Of these, 78 patients (28.4%) developed paranasal sinus invasion (T3b) and 197 (71.6%) didn’t (T3a). The estimated 5-year LFFS and overall survival (OS) rates for the patients with T3b and T3a classification were 88.6% versus 95.0% (p=0.047), and 84.5% versus 93.3% (p=0.183), respectively. The estimated 5-year LFFS and OS rates for the patientswith T4 classificationwere 89.5% and 83.2%,whichwere similarwith the outcomes of patients with T3b classification.
Conclusion
MRI-determined paranasal sinus invasion is an independent prognostic factor of NPC treated by IMRT. Paranasal sinus invasion is recommended to classify as T4 classification in the 8th AJCC staging system for NPC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Study of Early-Nasal Intervention Among Individuals With Nasopharyngeal Cancer to Prevent Radiation-Induced Sinusitis
    Tianbin Ouyang, Hou Shi, Yaowen Wang, Jianliang Zhou
    Ear, Nose & Throat Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of 18F‐FDG PET/MRI as an Initial Staging Procedure for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Caineng Cao, Yuting Fang, Bocheng Yu, Yuanfan Xu, Mengyun Qiang, Changjuan Tao, Shuang Huang, Xiaozhong Chen
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024; 59(3): 922.     CrossRef
  • Extent of paranasal sinus involvement and its prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Proposed modification in the current UICC/AJCC staging system
    Xiao-Yi Wang, Si-Yu Zhu, Wei-Jie WU, Hao-Jiang Li, Jiao Li, Xiao-Feng Lin, Li Li, Li-Zhi Liu
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2021; 160: 221.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Locoregional Extension Patterns of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Detected by FDG PET/MR
    Caineng Cao, Yuanfan Xu, Shuang Huang, Feng Jiang, Ting Jin, Qifeng Jin, Yonghong Hua, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Paranasal Sinus Invasion on Oncologic and Dosimetric Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Following Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy—Implications for Risk Stratification and Planning Optimization
    Xin Zhou, Xiayun He, Fen Xue, Xiaomin Ou, Chaosu Hu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value and Staging Classification of Lymph Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
    Yanru Feng, Caineng Cao, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1222.     CrossRef
  • Paranasal sinus invasion suggested T4 classification of patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A two‐center retrospective investigation
    Liqing Wu, Shuiqing Zhuo, Weike Zeng, Shaobo Liang, Shunxin Wang, Chunyan Cui, Jian Zhou, Guangyin Ruan, Shuoyu Xu, Lifei Wang, Ling Huang, Lizhi Liu, Haojiang Li
    Head & Neck.2019; 41(12): 4088.     CrossRef
  • 9,590 View
  • 151 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Detected Intracranial Extension in the T4 Classification Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Caineng Cao, Jingwei Luo, Li Gao, Junlin Yi, Xiaodong Huang, Suyan Li, Jianping Xiao, Zhong Zhang, Guozhen Xu
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):518-525.   Published online August 24, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.299
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study was conducted is to identify the prognostic value and staging categories of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–detected intracranial extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to determine whether it is necessary to subclassify the T4 classification NPC.
Materials and Methods
A total of 335 nonmetastatic T4 classificationNPC patientswith MRI treated between March 2004 and June 2011 by radical IMRTwere included. The T4 classification patientswere subclassified into two grades (T4a, without intracranial extension vs. T4b, with intracranial extension) according to the site of invasion.
Results
The frequency of intracranial extensionwas 40.9% (137 of 335 patients). Multivariate analysis identified subclassification (T4a vs. T4b) as an independent prognostic factor for local failure-free survival (p=0.049; hazard ratio [HR], 0.498) and overall survival (p=0.004; HR, 0.572); however, it had no effect on regional failure-free survival or distant failure-free survival (p > 0.050).
Conclusion
For patients with T4 classification NPC, those with MRI-detected intracranial extension are more likely to experience local failure and death afterIMRT than patientswithout intracranial extension. According to the site of invasion, subclassification of T4 patients as T4a or T4b has prognostic value in NPC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic value of MR-detected mandibular nerve involvement: potential indication for future individual induction chemotherapy in T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wenjie Huang, Shuqi Li, Chao Luo, Zhiying Liang, Shumin Zhou, Haojiang Li, Yi Cai, Shaobo Liang, Guangying Ruan, Peiqiang Cai, Lizhi Liu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5951.     CrossRef
  • The application of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with pterygopalatine fossa invasion
    Bi Zhou, Zhuoyue Tang, Liang Lv, Jiayi Yu, Xiaojiao Li, Chao Yang, Shifeng Xiang, Zuhua Song, Dan Zhang
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2023; 96: 38.     CrossRef
  • MRI-based random survival Forest model improves prediction of progression-free survival to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Wei Pei, Chen Wang, Hai Liao, Xiaobo Chen, Yunyun Wei, Xia Huang, Xueli Liang, Huayan Bao, Danke Su, Guanqiao Jin
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of boost dose for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with residual primary lesion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Zhaodong Fei, Ting Xu, Xiufang Qiu, Mengying Li, Taojun Chen, Li Li, Chaoxiong Huang, Chuanben Chen
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2021; 147(7): 2047.     CrossRef
  • Can Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging be Used to Differentiate Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma From Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma?
    Zongqiong Sun, Shudong Hu, Yuxi Ge, Linfang Jin, Jianfeng Huang, Weiqiang Dou
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2021; 53(4): 1140.     CrossRef
  • Detailed analysis of recovery process of cranial nerve palsy after IMRT-based comprehensive treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Jian Zang, Yan Li, Shanquan Luo, Jianhua Wang, Bingxin Hou, Min Yao, Lina Zhao, Mei Shi
    Radiation Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chi Leung Chiang, Qiaojuan Guo, Wai Tong Ng, Shaojun Lin, Tiffany Sze Wai Ma, Zhiyuan Xu, Youping Xiao, Jishi Li, Tianzhu Lu, Horace Cheuk Wai Choi, Wenqi Chen, Eric Sze Chun Chau, Peter Ho Yin Luk, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O’Sullivan, Jianji Pan, Anne Wing
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Locoregional Extension Patterns of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Detected by FDG PET/MR
    Caineng Cao, Yuanfan Xu, Shuang Huang, Feng Jiang, Ting Jin, Qifeng Jin, Yonghong Hua, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Orbital Metastases: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Treatment Outcomes
    Paolo Palmisciano, Gianluca Ferini, Christian Ogasawara, Waseem Wahood, Othman Bin Alamer, Aditya D. Gupta, Gianluca Scalia, Alexandra M. G. Larsen, Kenny Yu, Giuseppe E. Umana, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol, Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh, Ali S. Haider
    Cancers.2021; 14(1): 94.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic efficacy of extensive invasion of primary tumor volume for T3-4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Fen Xue, Dan Ou, Xiaomin Ou, Xin Zhou, Chaosu Hu, Xiayun He
    Oral Oncology.2020; 100: 104478.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes for nasopharyngeal cancer with intracranial extension after taxane‐based induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy in the modern era
    Sarbani Ghosh‐Laskar, Avinash Pilar, Carlton Johnny, Kumar Prabhash, Amit Joshi, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Tejpal Gupta, Ashwini Budrukkar, Vedang Murthy, Monali Swain, Vanita Noronha, Vijay Maruthi Patil, Prathamesh Pai, Deepa Nair, Devendra Arvind Chaukar, S
    World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2020; 6(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Paranasal Sinus Invasion on Oncologic and Dosimetric Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Following Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy—Implications for Risk Stratification and Planning Optimization
    Xin Zhou, Xiayun He, Fen Xue, Xiaomin Ou, Chaosu Hu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of maximum MLC leaf speed on the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Jiayun Chen, Weijie Cui, Qi Fu, Haojia Zhang, Xiaodong Huang, Fei Han, Wenlong Xia, Bin Liang, Jianrong Dai
    Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.2020; 21(11): 37.     CrossRef
  • Paranasal Sinus Invasion in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
    Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Grading of MRI–detected skull-base invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with skull-base invasion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Yanru Feng, Caineng Cao, Qiaoying Hu, Xiaozhong Chen
    Radiation Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Locoregional extension and patterns of failure for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intracranial extension
    Caineng Cao, Feng Jiang, Qifeng Jin, Ting Jin, Shuang Huang, Qiaoying Hu, Yuanyuan Chen, Yongfeng Piao, Yonghong Hua, Xinglai Feng, Xiaozhong Chen
    Oral Oncology.2018; 79: 27.     CrossRef
  • Dosimetric comparison and observation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Rongqiang Pan, Jingming Wang, Feng Qi, Ruizhen Liu
    Oncology Letters.2017; 14(4): 4741.     CrossRef
  • 11,342 View
  • 163 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Preliminary Suggestion about Staging of Anorectal Malignant Melanoma May Be Used to Predict Prognosis
Won Young Chae, Jong Lyul Lee, Dong-Hyung Cho, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Roh, Jin Cheon Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):240-249.   Published online March 6, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.305
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Anorectal malignant melanomas (AMM) are rare and have poor survival. The study aims to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with AMM, and to devise a staging system predictive of survival outcome.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective study of 28 patients diagnosed with, and treated for AMM. Patients classified by clinical staging of mucosal melanoma (MM) were reclassified via rectal and anal TNM staging. Survival outcomes were compared among patients grouped by the three different staging systems.
Results
The three staging systems were equated with similar figures for 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with stage I disease. Patients (n=19) diagnosed with MM stage II disease were reclassified by rectal TNM staging into three subgroups: IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC. For these patients, both 5-year OS and 5-year DFS differed significantly between the subgroups IIIA and IIIC (OS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 66.7% vs. 0%, p=0.002; DFS: IIIA vs. IIIC, 51.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The accuracy of prognosis in patients diagnosed with AMM and lymph node metastasis has improved by using rectal TNM staging, which includes information regarding the number of lymph node metastases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival and Prognosis for Patients with Rectal Melanomas in the United States: A SEER-Based Study
    Fan Zhang, Boqi Xu, Yao Peng, Runda Wu, Shan Tong, Zhongqi Mao
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence and survival of patients with primary gastrointestinal melanoma: a population-based study
    Yu Du, Xiaona Chang, Xiangxiang Li, Shugang Xing
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Melanoma anorrectal primario: reporte de un caso y revisión de una neoplasia infrecuente
    Hernando Marulanda Fernández, Felipe Vera-Polanía, Juan Antonio Trejos Naranjo, Julian Ernesto Parga Bermudez, William Otero Regino
    Revista colombiana de Gastroenterología.2023; 38(4): 504.     CrossRef
  • A New Anorectal Melanoma Cell Line Derived from a Primary Human Rectal Tumor
    Seiichi Shinji, Yuuki Shichi, Takeshi Yamada, Goro Takahashi, Ryo Ohta, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akihisa Matsuda, Kazuhide Yonaga, Takuma Iwai, Kohki Takeda, Koji Ueda, Sho Kuriyama, Toshimitsu Miyasaka, Yoshibumi Ueda, Norihiko Sasaki, Kimimasa Takahashi, Ryuji
    Journal of Nippon Medical School.2022; 89(4): 368.     CrossRef
  • Difficulties in diagnosing anorectal melanoma: A case report and review of the literature
    Raluca Cristina Apostu, Elena Stefanescu, Radu Razvan Scurtu, Gabriel Kacso, Radu Drasovean
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(36): 11369.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Patients with Anorectal Malignant Melanoma; Results of Nine Cases in a Single Institution
    Tomoyuki Nagaoka, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Eiji Shinozaki, Yosuke Fukunaga
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(2): 192.     CrossRef
  • Management and outcomes of primary anorectal melanoma in the United States
    Hari Menon, Roshal R Patel, Taylor R Cushman, Arya Amini, Steven N Seyedin, Anngela C Adams, Chi Lin, Vivek Verma
    Future Oncology.2020; 16(8): 329.     CrossRef
  • Melanoma anal, una patología radicalmente distinta al melanoma cutáneo, con un pronóstico infausto
    Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
    Cirugía Española.2020; 98(8): 491.     CrossRef
  • Anal Melanoma, a Radically Different Pathology to the Cutaneous Melanoma, With an Infaustic Forecast
    Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2020; 98(8): 491.     CrossRef
  • Beyond adenocarcinoma: MRI of uncommon rectal neoplasms and mimickers
    David D. B. Bates, Maria Clara Fernandes de Paula, Natally Horvat, Shannon Sheedy, Chandana Lall, Zahra Kassam, Perry Pickhardt, Neeraj Lalwani, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Iva Petkovska
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(11): 3581.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors in primary anorectal melanoma: a clinicopathological study of 60 cases in China
    Min Ren, Yawen Lu, Jiaojie Lv, Xuxia Shen, Jincheng Kong, Bo Dai, Yunyi Kong
    Human Pathology.2018; 79: 77.     CrossRef
  • 16,391 View
  • 191 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
A Distribution Weighted Prognostic Scoring Model for Node Status in Advanced Rectal Cancer
Kwang-Hee Yeo, Ho Hyun Kim, Dong-Yi Kim, Young-Jin Kim, Jae-Kyun Ju
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(1):41-47.   Published online January 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.1.41
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
There are various lymph node-based staging systems. Nevertheless, there is debate over the use of parameters such as the number of involved lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio. As a possible option, the distribution of metastatic lymph nodes may have a prognostic significance in rectal cancer. This study is designed to evaluate the impact of distribution-weighted nodal staging on oncologic outcome in rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database of our institution, a total of 435 patients who underwent a curative low anterior resection for mid and upper rectal cancer between 1995 and 2004 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the location of apical metastatic nodes. A location-weighted prognostic score was calculated by a scoring model using a logistic regression test for location based-statistical weight to number of lymph nodes. All cases were categorized in quartiles from lymph node I to lymph node IV using this protocol.
RESULTS
The location of lymph node metastasis was an independent factor that was associated with a poor prognostic outcome (p<0.001). Based on this result, the location-weighted-nodal prognostic scoring model did not show lesser significant results (p<0.0001) in both overall survival and cancer-free survival analyses.
CONCLUSION
The location of apical nodes among the metastatic nodes does not have a lesser significant impact on oncologic result in patients with advanced rectal cancer. A location-weighted prognostic scoring model, which considered the numbers of involved lymph nodes as the rate of significance according to the location, may more precisely predict the survival outcome in patients with lymph node metastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors for T1-2 colorectal cancer after radical resection: Lymph node distribution is a valuable predictor of its survival
    Xing Huang, Hao Liu, Xiangqi Liao, Zhigang Xiao, Zhongcheng Huang, Guoxin Li
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 241.     CrossRef
  • Chemical shift effect predicting lymph node status in rectal cancer using high-resolution MR imaging with node-for-node matched histopathological validation
    Hongmei Zhang, Chongda Zhang, Zhaoxu Zheng, Feng Ye, Yuan Liu, Shuangmei Zou, Chunwu Zhou
    European Radiology.2017; 27(9): 3845.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic impact of lymph node skip metastasis in Stage III colorectal cancer
    F. Bao, L.‐y. Zhao, A. I. Balde, H. Liu, J. Yan, T.‐t. Li, H. Chen, G.‐x. Li
    Colorectal Disease.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Stage III Colon Cancer
    Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Yoshiya Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Yosuke Fukunaga, Masami Arai, Masashi Ueno
    World Journal of Surgery.2015; 39(12): 3008.     CrossRef
  • Five-year outcomes of preoperative chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma in Saudi population: single-institutional experience
    Eyad Fawzi AlSaeed, Mutahir Tunio, Ahmad Zubaidi, Omar Al-Obaid, Abdullah Kamal Ahmed, Omar Abdulmohsen Al-Omar, Emad Ahmed Abid, Mohammed Jaber Alsiwat
    Annals of Saudi Medicine.2015; 35(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • 10,889 View
  • 53 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Value of New Staging Systems for Multiple Myeloma
Jung-Hye Choi, Jae-Hoon Yoon, Seong-Kyu Yang
Cancer Res Treat. 2007;39(4):171-174.   Published online December 31, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2007.39.4.171
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

We wanted to investigate the validity of the recently introduced Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) staging system and the International Staging System (ISS) by comparing both systems with the widely accepted Durie/Salmon (DS) system for multiple myeloma patients.

Materials and Methods

Between 1992 and 2005, 85 multiple myeloma patients (men: women 41:44, median age: 63 years (range: 36~87)) with available baseline values of albumin and β2-microglobulin were enrolled. The clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively obtained.

Results

According to the ISS, 11 patients were stage I (12.9%), 30 patients stage II (35.3%) and 44 patients stage III (51.8%). The median survivals of the ISS stages I, II and III were 78.6 months, 31.8 months and 15.1 months, respectively (p=0.015). The DS staging system was not able to predict the survival. For the SWOG staging system, 14 patients were stage I (16.4%), 27 patients stage II (31.8%), 27 patients stage III (31.8%) and 17 patients were stage IV (20.0%). The median survivals of the SWOG staging system stage I, II, III and IV were 78.6 months, 31.8 months, 11.6 months and 24.8 months, respectively (p=0.0075).

Conclusion

The ISS staging system showed better reliability, simplicity and predictability for survival than the DS and SWOG staging systems for multiple myeloma patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk stratification of cardiac metastases using late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: prognostic impact of hypo-enhancement evidenced tumor avascularity
    Angel T. Chan, William Dinsfriend, Jiwon Kim, Brian Yum, Razia Sultana, Christopher A. Klebanoff, Andrew Plodkowski, Rocio Perez Johnston, Michelle S. Ginsberg, Jennifer Liu, Raymond J. Kim, Richard Steingart, Jonathan W. Weinsaft
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.2021; 23(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Utility of a Diagnostic Approach to Detect Genetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Experience
    Hyun Ae Jung, Mi-Ae Jang, Kihyun Kim, Sun-Hee Kim
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2018; 38(3): 196.     CrossRef
  • The Role of18F-FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma Staging according to IMPeTUs: Comparison of the Durie–Salmon Plus and Other Staging Systems
    Shengming Deng, Bin Zhang, Yeye Zhou, Xin Xu, Jihui Li, Shibiao Sang, Wei Zhang
    Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Biochemical and electrophoretic evaluation of Clinically suspected multiple myeloma
    R SREEVANI NAMANI, DR LAXMI NARAYANA SRIPURAM
    International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reconstruction of multiple myeloma lesions around the pelvis and acetabulum
    Vasileios I. Sakellariou, Andreas F. Mavrogenis, Olga Savvidou, Franklin H. Sim, Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2015; 25(4): 643.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective analysis of 264 multiple myeloma patients
    CHUANYING GENG, NIAN LIU, GUANGZHONG YANG, AIJUN LIU, YUN LENG, HUIJUAN WANG, LIHONG LI, YIN WU, YANCHEN LI, WENMING CHEN
    Oncology Letters.2013; 5(2): 707.     CrossRef
  • 9,460 View
  • 31 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Differences in Overall Survival When Colorectal Cancer Patients are Stratified into New TNM Staging Strategy
Ho-Suk Oh, Hyoung-Jung Chung, Hearn-Kook Kim, Jong-Soo Choi
Cancer Res Treat. 2007;39(2):61-64.   Published online June 30, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2007.39.2.61
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the prognosis can be more precisely gauged by the revised 6th AJCC staging system and if this is suitable for Korean colorectal cancer patients, and especially for those patients in the Youngdong district.

Materials and Methods

Between September 1996 and December 2003, 365 patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare the overall and stage-specific 5-year survival. All the statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

The overall 5-year survival for the entire cohort was 62%. According to the stages defined by the AJCC fifth edition system, the 5-year stage-specific survival was 91% for stage I, 82% for stage II, 51% for stage III and 4% for stage IV. According to the stages defined by the AJCC sixth edition system, the 5-year stage-specific survival was 91% for stage I, 81% for stage IIa, 83% for stage IIb, 100% for stage IIIa, 64% for stage IIIb, 37% for stage IIIc and 4% for stage IV. The 5-year survival was significantly better for the patients with stage IIIb (64%) than those patients with stage IIIc (37%) (p<.001).

Conclusion

It is widely known that the AJCC sixth edition system for colorectal cancer stratifies survival more distinctly than does the fifth edition system by providing more substages. Our study showed that stage IIIb disease had better survival than stage IIIc disease, but we couldn't confirm that this new staging system is relevant in our Korean clinical practice due to the small study population. Therefore, further study is required in a larger population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Pathological Characteristics, Prognostic Determinants and the Outcome of Patients Diagnosed with Colorectal Adenocarcinoma at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali
    Delphine Uwamariya, Déogratias Ruhangaza, Belson Rugwizangoga, Antonio Giovanni Solimando
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Estimating short-term and long-term survival in rectal cancer patients using cure model
    Behrouz Beiranvand, Shaghayegh Kamian, Robabeh Ghodssi-Ghassemabadi
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2022; 11(9): 5615.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of prognostic factors in long-term survival of male and female patients with colorectal cancer using non-mixture cure model based on the Weibull distribution
    Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha, Elaheh Zarean, Fatemeh Masaebi, Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Reza Zali
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 38: 101562.     CrossRef
  • The role of socioeconomic disparity in colorectal cancer stage at presentation
    Aesha Patel, Owen Gantz, Pavel Zagadailov, Aziz M. Merchant
    Updates in Surgery.2019; 71(3): 523.     CrossRef
  • The effects of time valuation in cancer optimal therapies: a study of chronic myeloid leukemia
    Pedro José Gutiérrez-Diez, Miguel Ángel López-Marcos, Julia Martínez-Rodríguez, Jose Russo
    Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Permanent colostomy wound: Aeromedical disposal
    U Bhattacharya, A Kumar, AVK Raju
    Indian Journal of Aerospace Medicine.2019; 63: 39.     CrossRef
  • Analyzing the Long-Term Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Study Using Parametric Non-Mixture Cure Rate Models
    Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha, Elaheh Zarean , Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Seyyed Vahid Hosseini, Tara Azimi, Soheila Khodakarim
    International Journal of Cancer Management.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer in Jordan: Survival Rate and Its Related Factors
    Ghazi Faisal Sharkas, Kamal H. Arqoub, Yousef S. Khader, Mohammad R. Tarawneh, Omar F. Nimri, Marwan J. Al-zaghal, Hadil S. Subih
    Journal of Oncology.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • ROR1 expression as a biomarker for predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer
    Jian-Kang Zhou, Yu-Zhu Zheng, Xue-Sha Liu, Qiheng Gou, Rui Ma, Cheng-Lin Guo, Carlo M. Croce, Lunxu Liu, Yong Peng
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(20): 32864.     CrossRef
  • High expression levels of unc-51-like kinase 1 as a predictor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer
    YIFENG ZOU, ZEXIAN CHEN, XIAOWEN HE, XIAOSHENG HE, XIANRUI WU, YUFENG CHEN, XIAOJIAN WU, JIANPING WANG, PING LAN
    Oncology Letters.2015; 10(3): 1583.     CrossRef
  • Follow-up After Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer
    Bridget N. Fahy
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2014; 21(3): 738.     CrossRef
  • An overview of colorectal cancer survival rates and prognosis in Asia
    Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2012; 4(4): 71.     CrossRef
  • 17,148 View
  • 105 Download
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Usefulness of Additional Delayed Regional F-18 Fluorodeoxy-glucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Lymph Node Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Young So, June-Key Chung, Jae Min Jeong, Dong Soo Lee, Myung Chul Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(2):114-121.   Published online April 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.2.114
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

In this study, we examined whether additional, delayed regional FDG PET scans could increase the accuracy of the lymph node staging of NSCLC patients.

Materials and Methods

Among 87 patients who underwent open thoracotomy or mediastinoscopic biopsy under the suspicion of NSCLC, 35 (32 NSCLC and 3 infectious diseases) who had visible lymph nodes on both preoperative whole body scan and regional FDG PET scan were included. The following 3 calculations were made for each biopsy-proven, visible lymph node: maximum SUV of whole body scan (WB SUV), maximum SUV of delayed chest regional scan (Reg SUV), and the percent change of SUV between WB and regional scans (% SUV Change). ROC curve analyses were performed for WB SUVs, Reg SUVs and % SUV Changes.

Results

Seventy lymph nodes (29 benign, 41 malignant) were visible on both preoperative whole bodyscan and regional scan. The means of WB SUVs, Reg SUVs and % SUV Changes of the 41 malignant nodes, 3.71±1.08, 5.18±1.60, and 42.59±33.41%, respectively, were all significantly higher than those of the 29 benign nodes, 2.45±0.73, 3.00±0.89, and 22.71±20.17%, respectively. ROC curve analysis gave sensitivity and specificity values of 80.5% and 82.8% at a cutoff of 2.89 (AUC 0.839) for WB SUVs, 87.8% and 82.8% at a cutoff of 3.61 (AUC 0.891) for Reg SUVs, and 87.8% and 41.4% at a cutoff of 12.3% (AUC 0.671) for % SUV Changes.

Conclusion

Additional, delayed regional FDG PET scans may improve the accuracy of lymph node staging of whole body FDG PET scan by providing additional criteria of Reg SUV and % SUV Change.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • KSNM60 in Clinical Nuclear Oncology
    Seung Hwan Moon, Young Seok Cho, Joon Young Choi
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2021; 55(5): 210.     CrossRef
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and backgro
    Stephen P Povoski, Douglas A Murrey, Sabrina M Smith, Edward W Martin, Nathan C Hall
    BMC Cancer.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography ratio in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy
    Hyun-Cheol Kang, Hong-Gyun Wu, Tosol Yu, Hak Jae Kim, Jin Chul Paeng
    Radiation Oncology Journal.2013; 31(3): 111.     CrossRef
  • Defining the role of modern imaging techniques in assessing lymph nodes for metastasis in cancer: evolving contribution of PET in this setting
    Thomas C. Kwee, Sandip Basu, Drew A. Torigian, Babak Saboury, Abass Alavi
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2011; 38(7): 1353.     CrossRef
  • Imaging Atherosclerosis in the Carotid Arteries with F-18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography: Effect of Imaging Time after Injection on Quantitative Measurement
    Minyoung Oh, Ji Young Kim, Kwang-Ho Shin, Seol Hoon Park, Jin-Sook Ryu, Jae Seung Kim, Hye-Jin Kim, Dong-Wha Kang, Dae Hyuk Moon
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2010; 44(4): 261.     CrossRef
  • 10,386 View
  • 48 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
FDG-PET in Mediastinal Nodal Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Correlation of False Results with Histopathologic Finding
Hee Jong Baek, Jin Haeng Chung, Jong Ho Park, Jae Ill Zo, Gi Jeong Cheon, Chang Woon Choi, Sang Moo Lim, Soo Yong Choi, Jong Myeon Hong, Jang Soo Hong
Cancer Res Treat. 2003;35(3):232-238.   Published online June 30, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2003.35.3.232
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer can be markedly improved by FDG-PET scan, but the problem of false staging of mediastinal nodes by PET scan in non-small cell lung cancer has not yet been overcome. The aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying the false staging of mediastinal nodes by FDG-PET in the case of non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate the factors determining the FDG uptake in mediastinal nodes, FDG-PET was performed preoperatively, and mediastinal dissection with pulmonary resection was performed in 62 patients with NSCLC. GLUT-1 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry of the mediastinal nodes (n=111, true positive 31, true negative 41, false positive 27, false negative 12) using the anti-GLUT-1 antibody. The size, percentage of tumor (tumor ratio), labeling index (rate of stained tumor), staining intensity of the tumor, level of follicular hyperplasia, and staining intensity of the follicle center in the mediastinal node were also studied. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in size among the 4 nodal groups (TP, TN, FP, FN), nor in the tumor ratio of the metastatic nodes between the TP and FN groups. The labeling index and staining intensity of the TP group were higher than those of the FN group (Mann-Whitney test, p=.001, p=.007) in the case of the metastatic nodes. The level of follicular hyperplasia of the FP group was higher than that of the TN group in the case of the non-metastatic nodes (p=.000). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer by FDG-PET, the FN node is associated with low uptake of FDG due to low expression of GLUT-1, and that the FP node is associated with a high level of follicular hyperplasia as a result of there being a reactive change to an inflammatory and/or immune reaction. This is the first report on the mechanism underlying the false results that are sometimes obtained, and which constitute a major problem in the clinical application of FDG-PET to the mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Value of glucose transport protein 1 expression in detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer
    Hongsik Kim, Song-Yi Choi, Tae-Young Heo, Kyeong-Rok Kim, Jisun Lee, Min Young Yoo, Taek-Gu Lee, Joung-Ho Han
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2024; 12(5): 931.     CrossRef
  • Associations between GLUT expression and SUV values derived from FDG-PET in different tumors—A systematic review and meta analysis
    Hans-Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke, Alexey Surov, Pankaj K Singh
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(6): e0217781.     CrossRef
  • 4,061 View
  • 22 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
The Inefficiency of Routine Performance of a Batch of Tests in the Clinical Staging Work-up of Cervical Carcinoma
Soon Sup Shim, Jae Weon Kim, Yong Beom Kim, Ju Won Rho, Chul Min Lee, Noh Hyun Park, Yong Sang Song, Soon Beom Kang, Hyo Pyo Lee
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2000;32(4):705-713.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This study was to evaluate the efficiency of routine performance of a batch of tests in the clinical staging work-up of cervical carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The medical records were reviewed for 1,393 consecutive cervical carcinoma patients who underwent pretreatment staging work-up in Seoul National University Hospital from January 1988 to December 1997. The impression stage -which is designated ten tatively by the findings of pelvic examination and biopsy-, the results of staging work-up, and the finally allotted FIGO clinical stage were reviewed. The annual trend of stage distribution and the positive yields of tests were evaluated.
RESULTS
Annual trend shows that Ia is increasing. The positive yield of chest x-ray was 0.22% (3/1, 379; Ib: 1, IIa: 1, IIb: 1), intravenous pyelography (IVP) 2.50% (31/1, 242; Ib: 2, IIa: 4, IIb: 17, IIIb: 8), cystoscopy 0.55% (6/1, 093; IIb: 4, IIIb: 2), and proctosigmoidoscopy 0.086% (1/1, 157; Ib: 1). After completing the staging work-up, 29 patients (2.08%) were upstaged. The routine performance of IVP in impression stage Ia and cystoscopy in impression stage IIa or less was considered inefficient. The routine performance of proctosigmoidoscopy was considered inefficient because of its very low yield.
CONCLUSION
The selective performance of tests according to the impression stage during staging work-up is recommended to minimize the unnecessary treatment delay, cost, and patients' discomfort.
  • 2,453 View
  • 15 Download
Close layer
Role of PET Scan in Staging Work - up and Reevaluation after Therapy in Lymphoma
Young Jin Yuh, Chul Won Jung, Seock Ah Im, Dae Seog Heo, Yung Jue Bang, Seonyang Park, June Key Chung, Myung Chul Lee, Byoung Kook Kim, Noe Kyeong Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1999;31(5):1011-1017.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The authors evaluated the usefulness of the positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18-tluorodeoxyglucose (8F-FDG) in initial staging, reevaluation after radical therapy and diagnosis of recurrence for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, compaired to conventional imaging studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
FDG-PET (ECAT Exact 47, Siemens) and conventional chest X-ray and computerized tomography (CT) were studied in patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma.
RESULTS
There were 17 patients (13 male, 4 female). Age was ranged from 18 to 62 years (median 49). By histological subgroup, diffuse large cell were 8 cases, peripheral T cell were 2 cases, diffuse mixed was 1 case, follicular mixed was 1 case, Burkitt's lymphoma was 1 case, Hodgkin's disease were 3 cases. The aims for PET were the initial staging work-up in 7 cases, the reevaluation of residual disease after radical therapy in 7 cases, the diagnosis of recurrence after complete remission in 3 cases. Between PET image and the conventional image, there were 3 cases with discrepancy, 1 case for initial staging work-up and 2 cases for the reevaluation of residual disease after radical therapy. Among the 3 cases with discrepancy, the 2 cases for the reevaluation of residual disease after radical therapy revealed that PET image reflects the involvement of lymphoma more accurately than the conventional image.
CONCLUSION
The visual analysis of FDG-PET would be helpful in determining the residual disease of lymphoma after radical therapy.
  • 2,703 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer
Evaluation of the New UICC Staging System for Gastric Carcinoma
Hyeong Myeong Back, Sung Joon Kwon, Oh Jung Kwon, Pah Jong Jung, Kwang Su Lee, Jin Young Kwak, Kyu Young Jun, Chi Kyu Won
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1999;31(1):54-61.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
There are several kinds of classificatian dealing with the staging of the gastric adenocarcinoma. However, such different staging systems pose difficulty in the inter- institutional or intemational comparison of the disease status and the treatment results. The purpose of this study is to evaluate each staging system and to assess the usefulness of the new UICC-TNM staging system (1997) for gastric adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 473 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma who were operated at the Department of General Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital during the period from 1992 to 1996. Using these cases, we analyzed their cumulative 5-year survival rate according to three kinds of staging systems; old UICC-TNM staging system (1987), new UICC-TNM staging system (1997), and the Japanese staging system for gastric carcinoma (1993).
RESULTS
The follow up rate was 94.3% and the median follow up period was 30.3 months. All of these three systems showed a statistically significant survival difference according to their different classifications. When the distribution of stage between old and new UICC-TNM staging system was compared, 95 cases (20.1%) were subjected to stage shifting, which involves 12.1% of up-staging and 8.4% of down-staging. Stage shifting was most prominent in stage IIIb (68.8%). The cumulative 5-year survival rate according to the new UICC-TNM staging system was 99.1% in stage Ia, 81.4% in stage Ib, 75.2% in stage II, 45.9% in stage IIIa, 21.0% in stage IIIb, and 19.4% in stage IV.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that the new UICC-TNM staging system is simple, practically convenient, and highly reproducible, and it showed a statistically significant survival difference according to their staging classification.
  • 3,051 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer
Evaluation of Staging with MR Imaging in the Uterine Cervical Cancer
Woo Cheol Kim, Hae Jeong Jeon, Soon Gu Cho, Young Kap Cho, John K Loh
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1997;29(5):842-850.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Uterine cervical carcinoma is the most common cancer in Korean women. We evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in determining the stage and extent of disease in cervical carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 1994 through December 1996, in all 35 patients, MR imaging was performed before any operative procedure. With a 1.5T superconducting magnet, TR (repetition time)/TE (echo time) of 483/9msec for T1-weighted images and 3750/98msec for T2-weighted images were used. All patients underwent radical hysterectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy and had detailed histologic evaluation. MR image were reviewed and compared with pathologic findings on the presence of tumor size, depth of stromal invasion and vagina extension.
RESULTS
The accuracy of MRI in determination of stage was 74%. Its accuracy was 60% for the assessment of tumor size. Tumor size was underestimated in 6 patients (17%) and overestimated in 8 patients (23%). Tumor infiltration into the stroma was classified as no, partial, complete. The accuracy of MRI in cervical stromal invasion was 66%.
CONCLUSION
MR is a relatively promising method for staging and evaluating extent of disease in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
  • 2,645 View
  • 19 Download
Close layer
Quantitative Analysis of Metastatic Lymph Nodes after Curative Surgery in Gastric Cancer
Wansik Yu, Yeon Sik Ji, Gyu Seok Choi, Ilwoo Whang, In Soo Suh
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1997;29(1):62-68.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
A consecutive series of 710 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for carcinoma was studied with a special reference to the number or frequency of lymph node metastasis and the patient's prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between each group was evaluated statistically by the log-rank method. Follow-up was obtained for 709 patients (99.9%).
RESULTS
According to the number of lymph nodal metastases, the five year survival rate for group 1 (1~3 positive nodes) was 50.9%; for group 2 (4~6 positive nodes), 56.7%; and for group 3 (more than 6 positive nodes), 12.0% (p<0.0001). According to the frequency of lymph node metastases, the five year survival rate for those with up to 25 per cent frequency of metastases was 47.5%; for those with up to 50 per cent frequency of metastases, 15.6%; and for those with greater than 50 per cent metastases, 6.3% (p<0.0001). According to the frequency of the regional lymph nodes (which include perigastric nodes along the lesser and greater curvatures, nodes located along the left gastric, common hepatic, splenic, and celiac arteries) metastasis, we categorized them as group 0 (N0: no metastasis), 1 (N1: metastasis in up to 25%), and 2 (N2: metastasis in greater than 25%).
CONCLUSION
This subdivision could be successfully applied to the clinical evaluation of gastric carcinoma (five year survival rate for N0, 86.9%; for N1, 49.0%; and for N2, 10.7% (p<0.0001)) without difficulty in dividing certain lymph nodes into the correct location.
  • 2,627 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer
Accuracy of Properative Pathologic Diagnosis and Clinical Staging for Clinically Staged 3A Non - Small Cell Lung Cancer
Mi Sook Kim, Kyoung Hwan Koh, Seong Yul Yoo, Chul Koo Cho, Jae Ill Zo, Young Soo Do, Kyung Ja Cho
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1995;27(5):816-822.
AbstractAbstract PDF
The clinical staging of lung cancer, especially stage IIIA, provides important information for clinical analysis and treatment method to surgeon ar radiation oncologist. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate of difference between clinical staging and pathologic staging and determine to accuracy of preoperative pathologic diagnosis and clinical staging for clinically staged IIIA NSCLC. Analysis was performed on 138 patients who has been staged IIIA NSCLC. Pathologic diagnosis was performed using sputum cytology, bronchoscopy or percutaneous needle aspiration. All patients were evaluated by CT and staged according to American Joint Commit- tee on Cancer staging classification. All patients received the thoracotomy. The pathologic diagnosis was changed after surgery in 9 patients(6.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CT in dis- tinguishing T3 from Tl-T2 were 62.5%, 89.7%, 47.6%, 87.5%, and 75.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CT in distinguishing N2 from NO-Nl were 91.8%, 24.3%, 42.7%, 78.3%, and 54.8% respec- tively. According to pathologic staging, there were 27(19.6%) patients in stage I, 24(17.4%) in stage II, 64(46.4%) in stage IIIA, 21(15.2%) in stage IIIB, and 2(1.5%) in stage IV. Comparing clincal staging with pathologic staging, concordant results were found in 46.4%, 37.0% were clinically overestimated and 16.7% underestimated. Preoperative pathologic diagnosis was well correlate postoperative pathologic finding. But CT accuracy was low in both primary tumor and mediastinal lymph node. Especially to diagnose malignant involvement of mediastinal nodes, CT is not a valid means. Patients would not be denied the opportunity for curative surgery on the basis of CT signs.
  • 2,764 View
  • 14 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP