Purpose
To investigate the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with large uveal melanoma (UM).
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of 64 consecutive patients with UM treated with Cyberknife at Yonsei Cancer Center from September 2015 to October 2021. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range 48-64 Gy) administered in four fractions every alternate day. The local failure-free rate (LFFR), distant metastasis-free rate (DMFR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze the predictive factors affecting survival outcomes and the factors associated with vision loss.
Results
The median tumor diameter and height were 11.5 mm and 8.4 mm, respectively. After a median follow-up of 32.1 months (range 4.9–89.9), the 3-year LFFR, DMFR, PFS, and OS were 89.5%, 70.5%, 65.5%, and 89.4%, respectively. Enucleation was performed in 13 (20.3%) patients, with three cases attributed to disease progression. A larger tumor diameter was associated with significantly worse DMFR (HR=1.35, p=0.015) and OS (HR=1.49, p=0.026) in the multivariate analysis. Regarding visual prognosis, 41 (64.1%) patients had baseline visual acuity ≥20/200, but only 4 (6.3%) patients maintained visual acuity ≥20/200 by the final follow-up. Initial visual acuity ≥20/40 (HR 0.45, p=0.030) was the single favorable significant factor predicting visual retention ≥20/200 in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
SBRT using CyberKnife demonstrated a comparable local control rate to that observed in historical studies for patients with large UM. Distant metastasis and treatment-related ocular toxicity remain the limitations of this treatment.
Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) are increasingly used as initial therapies for brain metastases (BM). We aimed to assess the outcomes of SRS/FSRT in patients aged ≥ 65 years who had 1-10 BM from non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 91 elderly NSCLC patients with 222 BM who were treated with SRS/FSRT at two institutions between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after SRS/FSRT. In addition, in-field local control (IFLC) within the treated field was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors affecting OS and IFLC.
Results During a median follow-up of 18 months, the median OS was 32 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 69.8% and 56.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the NSCLC-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score (p=0.007) and administration of systemic therapy (p=0.039) were defined as prognosticators affecting OS. The median IFLC period was 31 months, and the 1- and 2-year IFLC rates were 75.9% and 57.6%, respectively. The total BM volume (p=0.042) significantly affected IFLC. No severe adverse events were reported after SRS/FSRT.
Conclusion SRS/FSRT is an effective upfront treatment option for BM arising from NSCLC in elderly patients, with a good OS without severe side effects. Higher GPA score and active systemic treatment were associated with improved OS, indicating that elderly patients are significant candidates for SRS/FSRT.
Purpose This study aimed to determine the role of local ablative radiotherapy (LART) in oligometastatic/oligoprogressive lung adenocarcinoma.
Materials and Methods Patients (n=176) with oligometastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with LART were identified, and those treated with LART at the initial diagnosis of synchronous oligometastatic disease (OMD group) or treated with LART when they presented with repeat oligoprogression (OPD group) were included.
Results In the OMD group (n=54), the 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 50.9% and 22.5%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 3-year overall survival in the OPD group were 75.9% and 58.1%, respectively. Forty-one patients (75.9%) received LART at all gross disease sites. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use and all-metastatic site LART were significant predictors of higher PFS (p=0.018 and p=0.046, respectively). In patients treated with TKIs at the time of LART (n=23) and those treated with all-metastatic site LART, the 1-year PFS was 86.7%, while that of patients not treated with all-metastatic site LART was 37.5% (p=0.006). In the OPD group (n=122), 67.2% of the patients (n=82) maintained a systemic therapy regimen after LART. The cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy was 39.6%, 62.9%, and 78.5% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after LART, respectively.
Conclusion Aggressive LART can be an option to improve survival in patients with oligometastatic disease. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease receiving TKI and all-metastatic site LART may have improved PFS. In patients with repeat oligoprogression, LART might potentially extend survival by delaying the need to change the systemic treatment regimen.
Purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) had been increasingly recognized as a favorable alternative to surgical resection in patients with high risk for surgery. This study compared survival outcomes between sublobar resection (SLR) and SBRT for clinical stage I non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods Data were obtained from the Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry, a sampled nationwide database. This study retrospectively reviewed 382 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent curative SLR or SBRT from 2014 to 2016.
Results Of the patients, 43 and 339 underwent SBRT and SLR, respectively. Patients in the SBRT group were older and had worse pulmonary function. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in the SLR group compared with the SBRT group (86.6% vs. 57%, log-rank p < 0.001). However, after adjusting for age, sex, tumor size, pulmonary function, histology, smoking history, and adjuvant therapy, treatment modality was not an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.43 to 2.77; p=0.974). We performed subgroup analysis in the following high-risk populations: patients who were older than 75 years; patients who were older than 70 years and had diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide ≤ 80%. In each subgroup, there were no differences in OS and recurrence-free survival between patients who underwent SLR and those who received SBRT.
Conclusion In our study, there were no significant differences in terms of survival or recurrence between SBRT and SLR in medically compromised stage I NSCLC patients. Our findings suggest that SBRT could be considered as a potential treatment option for selected patients.
Purpose
The detection rate of early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity (GGO) has increased, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as an alternative to surgery in inoperable patients. However, reports on treatment results are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical outcome after SBRT in patients with early-stage lung cancer with GGO-predominant tumor lesions at a single institution.
Materials and Methods
This study included 89 patients with 99 lesions who were treated with SBRT for lung cancer with GGO-predominant lesions that had a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of ≤0.5 at Asan Medical Center between July 2016 and July 2021. A median total dose of 56.0 Gy (range, 48.0–60.0) was delivered using 10.0–15.0 Gy per fraction.
Results
The overall follow-up period for the study was median 33.0 months (range, 9.9 to 65.9 months). There was 100% local control with no recurrences in any of the 99 treated lesions. Three patients had regional recurrences outside of the radiation field, and three had distant metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 91.6%, and 82.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that advanced age and a low level of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were significantly associated with overall survival. There were no patients with grade ≥3 toxicity.
Conclusion
SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GGO-predominant lung cancer lesions and is likely to be considered as an alternative to surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Recent Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review Jibran Ahmad Khan, Ibrahem Albalkhi, Sarah Garatli, Marcello Migliore Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(11): 3354. CrossRef
The clinical effect of thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the treatment of lung malignancies less than 2CM in diameter Yafeng Zhang, Renzhong Shi, Xiaoming Xia, Kaiyao Zhang Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of ground-glass component on prognosis in early-stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy via Helical Tomotherapy Jintao Ma, Shaonan Fan, Wenhan Huang, Xiaohong Xu, Yong Hu, Jian He Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose
In pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (POM-CRC), the primarily recommended local therapy is metastasectomy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is another local therapy modality that is considered as an alternative option in patients who cannot undergo surgery. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to demonstrate the effects of SBRT on POM-CRC by integrating the relevant studies.
Materials and Methods
The authors explored MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS, and selected studies including patients treated with SBRT for POM-CRC and availability of local control (LC) or overall survival (OS) rate. In this meta-analysis, the effect of SBRT was presented in the form of the LC and OS rates for 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after SBRT as pooled estimates, and the frequency of pulmonary toxicity of grade 3 or higher after SBRT (PTG3-SBRT).
Results
Fourteen full texts among the searched 4,984 studies were the objects of this meta-analysis. The overall number of POM-CRC patients was 495 as per the integration of 14 studies. The pooled estimate LC rate at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after SBRT was 81.0%, 71.5%, 56.0%, and 61.8%, and the OS rate was 86.9%, 70.1%, 57.9%, and 43.0%, respectively. The LC and OS rates gradually declined until 3 years after SBRT in a similar pattern. Among the 14 studies, only two studies reported PTG3-SBRT as 2.2% and 10.8%, respectively.
Conclusion
For POM-CRC, SBRT is an ablative therapy with a benefit on LC and OS rates and less adverse effects on the lung.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study Myrtle F. Krul, Jan M. van Rees, Amihan M. de Boer, Karlijn K. Neve, Cornelis Verhoef, Koert F.D. Kuhlmann, Tarik R. Baetens, Tineke E. Buffart, Joost L. Knegjens, Houke M. Klomp, Theo J.M. Ruers, Marianne de Vries, Joost Rothbarth, Esther van Meerten, Jo Digestive Diseases.2024; 42(6): 538. CrossRef
Clinical outcomes and lung toxicities after lung SABR using dynamic conformal arc therapy: a single-institution cohort study Emmanuel Mesny, Myriam Ayadi, Pauline Dupuis, Guillaume Beldjoudi, Ronan Tanguy, Isabelle Martel-Lafay Radiation Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Knowing When to Use Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Cancer Davide Franceschini, Maria Ausilia Teriaca, Luca Dominici, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 7009. CrossRef
Purpose
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) is gaining evidence as a predictive factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment in early-stage NSCLC when a patient is unsuitable for surgery. We performed a study to assess the prognostic clinical significance of PET-CT after SABR in early-stage NSCLC.
Materials and Methods
Seventy-six patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SABR were investigated. Total radiation dose ranged from 36 to 63 Gy in three to eight fractions depending on tumor location and size. Respiratory motion control was implemented at simulation and during treatment. PET-CT prior to SABR was performed in 66 patients (86.8%).
Results
Median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 5 to 142 months). Local control rate at 1, 2, and 5 years were 95.9%, 92.8%, and 86.7%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 5 years were 91.0%, 71.3%, and 52.1% respectively. Cause-specific survival at 1, 2, and 5 years were 98.6%, 93.1%, and 84.3% respectively. Tumor size and pre-SABR maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) demonstrated statistical significance in the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank test. In multivariate analyses pre-SABR SUVmax remained statistically significant in correlation to OS (p=0.024; hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 8.8) and with marginal significance in regards to regional progression-free survival (p=0.059; HR, 32.5; 95% CI, 2.6 to 402.5).
Conclusion
Pre-SABR SUVmax demonstrated a predictive power in statistical analyses. Tumors with SUVmax above 6 at diagnosis were associated with inferior outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhanced NSCLC subtyping and staging through attention-augmented multi-task deep learning: A novel diagnostic tool Runhuang Yang, Weiming Li, Siqi Yu, Zhiyuan Wu, Haiping Zhang, Xiangtong Liu, Lixin Tao, Xia Li, Jian Huang, Xiuhua Guo International Journal of Medical Informatics.2025; 193: 105694. CrossRef
Invasive Nodal Staging via Endobronchial Ultrasound and Outcome in Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer – Results from a Single Institution Study Benjamin George, Atallah Baydoun, Samar Bhat, Lauryn Bailey, Theodore Arsenault, Yilun Sun, Yuxia Zhang, Yiran Zheng, Prashant Vempati, Tarun Podder, Tithi Biswas Clinical Lung Cancer.2024; 25(4): e181. CrossRef
Prognostic value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio on computed tomography in NSCLC: a meta-analysis Yongming Wu, Wenpeng Song, Denian Wang, Junke Chang, Yan Wang, Jie Tian, Sicheng Zhou, Yingxian Dong, Jing Zhou, Jue Li, Ziyi Zhao, Guowei Che World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Tumor to liver maximum standardized uptake value ratio of FDG-PET/CT parameters predicts tumor treatment response and survival of stage III non-small cell lung cancer Pengfei Zhang, Wei Chen, Kewei Zhao, Xiaowen Qiu, Tao Li, Xingzhuang Zhu, Peng Sun, Chunsheng Wang, Yipeng Song BMC Medical Imaging.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors Jixia Han, Qi Song, Feng Guo, Rui Du, Henghu Fang, Jingbo Kang, Zejun Lu Nuclear Medicine Communications.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessing tumor angiogenesis using dynamic contrast-enhanced integrated magnetic resonance-positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer Yu-Sen Huang, Jenny Ling-Yu Chen, Hsin-Ming Chen, Li-Hao Yeh, Jin-Yuan Shih, Ruoh-Fang Yen, Yeun-Chung Chang BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Potential role of functional imaging in predicting outcome for patients treated with carbon ion therapy: a review Giulia Riva, Sara Imparato, Giovanni Savietto, Mattia Pecorilla, Alberto Iannalfi, Amelia Barcellini, Sara Ronchi, Maria Rosaria Fiore, Chiara Paganelli, Giulia Buizza, Mario Ciocca, Guido Baroni, Lorenzo Preda, Ester Orlandi The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic value of metabolic signature on 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy Jin Meng, Emmanuel Deshayes, Li Zhang, Wei Shi, Xiaomeng Zhang, Xingxing Chen, Xin Mei, Jinli Ma, Yizhou Jiang, Jiong Wu, Zhimin Shao, Xiaoli Yu, Zhaozhi Yang, Xiaomao Guo Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics.2021; 23: 412. CrossRef
Parámetros cuantitativos de la PET/TC con 18F-FDG como factores pronósticos en el cáncer de pulmón localizado e inoperable J.R. Infante, J. Cabrera, J.I. Rayo, C. Cruz, J. Serrano, M. Moreno, A. Martínez, P. Jiménez, A. Cobo Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular.2020; 39(6): 353. CrossRef
18F-FDG PET/CT quantitative parameters as prognostic factors in localized and inoperable lung cancer J.R. Infante, J. Cabrera, J.I. Rayo, C. Cruz, J. Serrano, M Moreno, A. Martínez, P. Jiménez, A. Cobo Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (English Edition).2020; 39(6): 353. CrossRef
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating spinal metastasis with epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC).
Materials and Methods
During 2013-2016, 149 regions of spinal metastasis in 105 patients treated with singlefraction (12-24 Gy) spinal SRS were reviewed. Cord compression of Bilsky grade 2 (with visible cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) or 3 (no visible CSF) was defined as ESCC. Local progression (LP) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rates after SRS were evaluated using multivariate competing-risk regression analysis.
Results
The 1-year cumulative incidences of LP for Bilsky grades 0 (n=80), 1 (n=39), 2 (n=21), and 3 (n=9) were 3.0%, 8.4%, 0%, and 24.9%, respectively. Bilsky grade 2 ESCC did not significantly increase the LP rate (no LP for grade 2). The 1-year cumulative incidences of VCF for Bilsky grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 6.6%, 5.2%, 17.1%, and 12.1%, respectively. ESCC may increase VCF risk (subhazard ratio [SHR] for grade 2, 5.368; p=0.035; SHR for grade 3, 2.215; p=0.460). Complete or partial pain response rates after SRS were 79%, 78%, 53%, and 63% for Bilsky grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.008). No neurotoxicity of grade ≥ 3 was observed.
Conclusion
Spinal SRS for spinal metastasis with Bilsky grade 2 ESCC did not increase the LP rate, was not associated with severe neurotoxicity, and showed moderate VCF and pain response rates. Bilsky grade 3 had a high LP rate.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline R.S. Guninski, F. Cuccia, F. Alongi, N. Andratschke, C. Belka, D. Bellut, M. Dahele, M. Josipovic, T.E. Kroese, P. Mancosu, G. Minniti, M. Niyazi, U Ricardi, P. Munck af Rosenschold, A. Sahgal, Y. Tsang, W.F.A.R. Verbakel, M. Guckenberger Radiotherapy and Oncology.2024; 190: 109969. CrossRef
Metastatic Spinal Lesion with Minimal Epidural Compression: Surgical Treatment or Stereotactic Radiotherapy? O. I. Kit, D. E. Zakondyrin, A. A. Grin, E. E. Rostorguev, Y. V. Przhedetskiy, P. G. Sakun, V. I. Voshedskii, B. V. Matevosian, T. S. Shepelya Creative surgery and oncology.2024; 14(2): 127. CrossRef
Surgical Interventions Following Radiotherapy in Spinal Metastases with Intermediate Instability: A Risk Factor Analysis: The Korean Society of Spinal Tumor Multicenter Study (KSST 2022-02) Se-Jun Park, Jin Ho Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Woong Sub Koom, Hwa Kyung Byun, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Dong-Ho Kang Cancers.2024; 16(14): 2554. CrossRef
Development of a novel 12-point grading system for evaluating epidural spinal cord compression and its clinical implications Xuyong Cao, Weihao Jiang, Xiongwei Zhao, Haikuan Yu, Mingxing Lei, Yuncen Cao, Xiuyun Su, Yaosheng Liu The Spine Journal.2023; 23(12): 1858. CrossRef
Efficacy of Total En Bloc Spondylectomy versus Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Single Spinal Metastasis Dong-Ho Kang, Wooseok Lee, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim, Sam Yeol Chang, Seong Hwa Hong, Jin Ho Kim, Hee Jung Son Cancers.2023; 15(23): 5518. CrossRef
Radiomic modeling to predict risk of vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases Chengcheng Gui, Xuguang Chen, Khadija Sheikh, Liza Mathews, Sheng-Fu L. Lo, Junghoon Lee, Majid A. Khan, Daniel M. Sciubba, Kristin J. Redmond Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(2): 294. CrossRef
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review Lanlan Guo, Lixin Ke, Ziyi Zeng, Chuanping Yuan, Ziwei Wu, Lei Chen, Lixia Lu Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment of Metastatic Spinal Disease; what the Radiologist needs to know Stephen Supple, Shahjehan Ahmad, Santhosh Gaddikeri, Miral D. Jhaveri The British Journal of Radiology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions Daniel M. Sciubba, Zach Pennington, Matthew W. Colman, C. Rory Goodwin, Ilya Laufer, Joshua C. Patt, Kristin J. Redmond, Philip Saylor, John H. Shin, Joseph H. Schwab, Andrew J. Schoenfeld The Spine Journal.2021; 21(9): 1414. CrossRef
An updated algorithm for the treatment of spinal metastasis Kawngwoo Park, Seong Son, Sang Gu Lee, En Kyung Cho, Hee Kyung Ahn, In Keun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Young Saing Kim Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.2021; 17(2): 70. CrossRef
Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review Giuseppe Di Perna, Fabio Cofano, Cristina Mantovani, Serena Badellino, Nicola Marengo, Marco Ajello, Ludovico Maria Comite, Giuseppe Palmieri, Fulvio Tartara, Francesco Zenga, Umberto Ricardi, Diego Garbossa Journal of Bone Oncology.2020; 25: 100320. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary management of metastatic spine disease: initial symptom-directed management Jeremy M Steinberger, Frank Yuk, Amish H Doshi, Sheryl Green, Isabelle M Germano Neuro-Oncology Practice.2020; 7(Supplement): i33. CrossRef
Purpose
Thoracic re-irradiation (re-RT) of lung cancer has been challenged by the tolerance doses of normal tissues. We retrospectively analyzed local control, overall survival (OS) and toxicity after thoracic re-RT using highly conformal radiotherapy, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-one patients who received high-dose thoracic re-RT were analyzed. Doses were recalculated to determine biologically equivalent doses. The median interval to re-RT was 15.1 months (range, 4.4 to 56.3 months), the median initial dose was 79.2 Gy10 (range, 51.75 to 150 Gy10), and the median re-RT dose was 68.8 Gy10 (range, 43.2 to 132 Gy10).
Results
Eighteen (58.1%) and eleven (35.5%) patients showed loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively, after 17.4 months of median follow-up. The 1-year and 2-year local control rates were 60.2% and 43.7%, respectively. The median loco-regional recurrence-free-survival (LRFS) was 15.4 months, and the median OS was 20.4 months. The cumulative and re-RT biologically equivalent dose for α/β=10 (BED10) doses were the most significant prognostic factors. Cumulative BED10 ≥145 Gy10 and re-RT BED10≥68.7 Gy10 were significantly associated with longer OS (p=0.029 and p=0.012, respectively) and LRFS (p=0.003 and p=0.000, respectively). The most frequent acute toxicity was grade 1-2 pulmonary toxicity (41.9%). No acute grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred.
Conclusion
Our results show that high-dose thoracic re-RT of lung cancer can be safely delivered using highly conformal radiotherapy with favorable survival and acceptable toxicity. An optimal strategy to select patients who would benefit from re-RT is crucial in extending the indications and improving the efficacy with a sufficiently high dose.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Proton Beam Therapy Steven J. Frank, Indra J. Das, Charles B. Simone, Brian J. Davis, Curtiland Deville, Zhongxing Liao, Simon S. Lo, Susan L. McGovern, Rahul R. Parikh, Michael Reilly, William Small, Naomi R. Schechter International Journal of Particle Therapy.2024; 13: 100021. CrossRef
Ultra-Hypofractionated Re-Irradiation with Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy for Locoregionally Recurrent (after Radical Chemo-Radiotherapy) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Konstantinos Filippatos, Ioannis M. Koukourakis, Stavros Anevlavis, Axiotis Giaktzidis, Michael I. Koukourakis Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5083. CrossRef
Re-irradiation for intra-thoracic tumours and extra-thoracic breast cancer: dose accumulation, evaluation of efficacy and toxicity based on a literature review Dorota Gabrys, Roland Kulik, Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka The British Journal of Radiology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
High Dose Thoracic Re-Irradiation and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Centrally Recurrent NSCLC Brane Grambozov, Markus Stana, Bernhard Kaiser, Josef Karner, Sabine Gerum, Elvis Ruznic, Barbara Zellinger, Raphaela Moosbrugger, Michael Studnicka, Gerd Fastner, Felix Sedlmayer, Franz Zehentmayr Cancers.2022; 14(3): 573. CrossRef
Toxicity of Proton Therapy versus Photon Therapy on Salvage Re-Irradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Kyungmi Yang, Yang-Gun Suh, Hyunju Shin, Hongryull Pyo, Sung Ho Moon, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh, Eunah Chung, Kwanghyun Jo, Jae Myoung Noh Life.2022; 12(2): 292. CrossRef
Salvage proton beam therapy for locoregional recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer Hyunju Shin, Jae Myoung Noh, Hongryull Pyo, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh Radiation Oncology Journal.2021; 39(1): 24. CrossRef
Thoracic re-irradiation with 3D-conformal or more advanced techniques: A systematic review of treatment safety by the Re-irradiation Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation and Oncology AIRO Marta Maddalo, Elisa D’Angelo, Francesco Fiorica, Angela Argenone, Melissa Scricciolo, Salvatore Cozzi, Alessia Nardangeli, Francesco Dionisi, Gianluca Costantino, Stefano Vagge, Antonio Pontoriero, Vittorio Donato, Mariangela Massaccesi Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2021; 167: 103500. CrossRef
Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours using an oral fixation and parameter acquisition device and TOMO technology: a randomised controlled study Xiaofang Zhang, Tianlu Wang, Xinyan Xiao, Xia Li, Chen Yu Wang, Bo Huang, Lei He, Yingqiu Song BMJ Open.2021; 11(11): e052542. CrossRef
The Medical Physics Management of Reirradiation Patients Kelly C. Paradis, Martha M. Matuszak Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2020; 30(3): 204. CrossRef
Reirradiation at local relapse of non-small cell lung cancer D.V. Gogolin, I.A. Gulidov, Y.S. Mardynsky, T.Y. Antonenko, A.Y. Buksha Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P.A.Gertsena.2020; 9(3): 48. CrossRef
Purpose
The treatment of liver metastases with local procedures is a fast progressing field. For the most, long-term survival data is missing raising questions with regard to the efficacy of such modalities when compared to surgical resection. Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife device enables the treatment of liver lesions with a single-session approach. Here we present long-term survival data to explore the curative potential of this strategy.
Materials and Methods
Patients with oligo-metastatic disease limited to the liver have been treated with single-session or hypo-fractioned radiosurgery in curative intent and prospectively followed until death. Follow-up (FU) was performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2 months after radiation and at 3-month intervals for the first 2 years. After that annual computed tomography or MRI scans were performed until 5 years post-treatment. Local recurrence in the radiated volume and recurrence outside the treated volume were used to define local and distant progression. Survival times were censored at the time of the last FU.
Results
One hundred twenty-six patients treated between 2005 and 2015 with 194 lesions were included into this study. Median FU was 30.0 months. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 55.2% had a complete remission and 11.3% a partial remission. Seventy-two point two percent recurred outside the radiated lesion and median overall survival was 35.2 months with a 3-year survival rate of 47.7%.
Conclusion
This is currently the largest cohort of stereotactic body radiation therapy treated liver lesions with a median long-term follow of 30 months. Robotic radiosurgery using a single session approach has a high efficacy to control the radiated lesion with the potential to cure patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Evidence Quality Assessment Ilektra Kyrochristou, Ilias Giannakodimos, Maria Tolia, Ioannis Georgakopoulos, Nikolaos Pararas, Francesk Mulita, Nikolaos Machairas, Dimitrios Schizas Diagnostics.2024; 14(10): 1055. CrossRef
Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy for Liver Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines Ciro Franzese, Alexander V. Louie, Rupesh Kotecha, Zhenwei Zhang, Matthias Guckenberger, Mi-Sook Kim, Alison C. Tree, Ben J. Slotman, Arjun Sahgal, Marta Scorsetti Practical Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf, Salem Alshehri, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Syahir Mansor, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido, Mamdouh Alqathami Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review A. N. Moskalenko, V. K. Lyadov, I. V. Sagaydak, M. V. Chernykh, N. N. Britskaya Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(1): 49. CrossRef
Anti-EGFR Therapy Induces EGF Secretion by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Confer Colorectal Cancer Chemoresistance Colleen M. Garvey, Roy Lau, Alyssa Sanchez, Ren X. Sun, Emma J. Fong, Michael E. Doche, Oscar Chen, Anthony Jusuf, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Brent Larson, Shannon M. Mumenthaler Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1393. CrossRef
Pierina Navarria, Anna Maria Ascolese, Stefano Tomatis, Giacomo Reggiori, Elena Clerici, Elisa Villa, Giulia Maggi, Lorenzo Bello, Federico Pessina, Luca Cozzi, Marta Scorsetti
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):37-44. Published online February 23, 2015
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of hypofractionated-stereotactic-radiationtherapy (HSRT) in patients re-treated for recurrent high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods From January 2006 to September 2013, 25 patients were treated. Six patients underwent radiation therapy alone, while 19 underwent combined treatment with surgery and/or chemotherapy. Only patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > 70 and time from previous radiotherapy greater than 6 months were re-irradiated. The mean recurrent tumor volume was 35 cm3 (range, 2.46 to 116.7 cm3), and most of the patients (84%) were treated with a total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions (range, 20 to 50 Gy in 5-10 fractions).
Results The median follow-up was 18 months (range, 4 to 36 months). The progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 and 2 years was 72% and 34% and the overall survival (OS) 76% and 50%, respectively. No severe toxicity was recorded. In univariate and multivariate analysis extent of resection at diagnosis significantly influenced PFS and OS (p < 0.01). Patients with smaller recurren tumor volume treated had better local control and survival. Indeed, the 2-year PFS was 40% (≤ 50 cm3) versus 11% (p=0.1) and the 2-year OS 56% versus 33% (> 50 cm3), respectively (p=0.26). Conclusion In our experience, HSRT could be a safe and feasible therapeutic option for recurrent high grade glioma even in patients with larger tumors. We believe that a multidisciplinary evaluation is mandatory to assure the best treatment for selected patients. Local treatment should also be considered as part of an integrated approach.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Promising outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma after Gamma Knife-based hypofractionated radiotherapy Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu, Kerime Akdur, Ayten Sakarcan, Mehmet Hakan Seyithanoglu, Haci Mehmet Turk, Georges Sinclair, Mustafa Namik Oztanir Neurochirurgie.2024; 70(2): 101532. CrossRef
A longer time to relapse is associated with a larger increase in differences between paired primary and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastomas at both the transcriptomic and genomic levels Wei-Min Ho, Chia-Ying Chen, Tai-Wei Chiang, Trees-Juen Chuang Acta Neuropathologica Communications.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT Mingyuan Pan, Wenqian Xu, Lei Sun, Chaozhuang Wang, Shengnan Dong, Yun Guan, Jun Yang, Enmin Wang Radiation Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
MiR-493-5p inhibits the malignant development of gliomas via suppressing E2F3-mediated dysfunctions of P53 and PI3K/AKT pathways Hong Liu, Zhen Li, Hu Sun Clinical and Translational Oncology.2022; 24(2): 363. CrossRef
Role of Hyperbaric Oxygenation Plus Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma Donatella Arpa, Elisabetta Parisi, Giulia Ghigi, Annalisa Cortesi, Pasquale Longobardi, Patrizia Cenni, Martina Pieri, Luca Tontini, Elisa Neri, Simona Micheletti, Francesca Ghetti, Manuela Monti, Flavia Foca, Anna Tesei, Chiara Arienti, Anna Sarnelli, Gi Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Identification of key genes involved in the recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and differential expression analysis Peng Ren, JingYa Wang, Lei Li, XiaoWan Lin, GuangHan Wu, JiaYi Chen, ZhiRui Zeng, HongMei Zhang Bioengineered.2021; 12(1): 3188. CrossRef
Treatment Results for Recurrent Glioblastoma and Alteration of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression After Recurrence Kyoung Su Sung, Tae Hoon Roh, Ju Hyung Moon, Eui Hyun Kim, Seok-Gu Kang, Se Hoon Kim, Jong Hee Chang World Neurosurgery.2020; 135: e459. CrossRef
Interim Tumor Progression and Volumetric Changes of Surgical Cavities during the Surgery-to-Radiotherapy Interval in Anaplastic Gliomas: Implications for Additional Pre-radiotherapy Magnetic Resonance Imaging Chan Woo Wee, Il Han Kim, Chul-Kee Park, Jin Wook Kim Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(2): 524. CrossRef
Re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma using helical TomoTherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: preliminary considerations of treatment efficacy Donatella Arpa, Elisabetta Parisi, Giulia Ghigi, Alessandro Savini, Sarah Pia Colangione, Luca Tontini, Martina Pieri, Flavia Foca, Rolando Polico, Anna Tesei, Anna Sarnelli, Antonino Romeo Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTICS OF A RADIONECROSIS AND LOCAL TUMORAL RECURRENCE ACCORDING TO ARTERIAL SPIN LABELLING AFTER RADIOSURGERY TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT GLIOMAS OF A BRAIN Andrey B. Gryazov, Yulia V. Medvedovska, Andrey A. Gryazov Wiadomości Lekarskie.2020; 73(10): 2160. CrossRef
Radiotherapy and Its Impact on the Nervous System of Cancer Survivors Gautam Kumar, Priyadarshini Dutta, Vipan K. Parihar, Mallikarjuna R. Chamallamudi, Nitesh Kumar CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets .2020; 19(5): 374. CrossRef
Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a systematic review and analysis of treatment technique with respect to survival and risk of radionecrosis Mihir Shanker, Benjamin Chua, Catherine Bettington, Matthew C Foote, Mark B Pinkham Neuro-Oncology Practice.2019; 6(2): 144. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Yan-jia Hu, Da Chen, Li-feng Zhang, Jing Chen World Neurosurgery.2019; 127: 176. CrossRef
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy or not in the management of recurrent malignant gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis YJ Hu, LF Zhang, C Ding, D Chen, J Chen Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2019; 183: 105401. CrossRef
Re-irradiation in the Brain: Primary Gliomas A.L.K. Ho, R. Jena Clinical Oncology.2018; 30(2): 124. CrossRef
Timing of re-irradiation in recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single institution study A. Zemlin, B. Märtens, B. Wiese, R. Merten, D. Steinmann Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2018; 138(3): 571. CrossRef
Role of surgical resection in recurrent glioblastoma: prognostic factors and outcome evaluation in an observational study Federico Pessina, Pierina Navarria, Luca Cozzi, Stefano Tomatis, Marco Riva, Anna Maria Ascolese, Armando Santoro, Matteo Simonelli, Lorenzo Bello, Marta Scorsetti Journal of Neuro-Oncology.2017; 131(2): 377. CrossRef
Re-irradiation after gross total resection of recurrent glioblastoma Christoph Straube, Greeshma Elpula, Jens Gempt, Julia Gerhardt, Stefanie Bette, Claus Zimmer, Friederike Schmidt-Graf, Bernhard Meyer, Stephanie E. Combs Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.2017; 193(11): 897. CrossRef
Survival and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery Kaleigh Fetcko, Rimas V. Lukas, Gordon A. Watson, Lingjiao Zhang, Mahua Dey Medicine.2017; 96(43): e8293. CrossRef
Laser Ablation of Recurrent Malignant Gliomas Analiz Rodriguez, Stephen B. Tatter Neurosurgery.2016; 79(Supplement): S35. CrossRef
Sun Hyun Bae, Mi-Sook Kim, Won Il Jang, Chul-Seung Kay, Woochul Kim, Eun Seog Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Kwang Mo Yang, Kyu Chan Lee, A Ram Chang, Sunmi Jo
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(3):379-386. Published online November 24, 2014
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the current status of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in Korea. A nationwide survey was conducted by the Korean Stereotactic Radiosurgery Group of the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology (KROG 13-13).
Materials and Methods
SBRT was defined as radiotherapy with delivery of a high dose of radiation to an extracranial lesion in ≤ 4 fractions. A 16-questionnaire survey was sent by e-mail to the chief of radiation oncology at 85 institutions in June 2013.
Results
All institutions (100%) responded to this survey. Of these, 38 institutions (45%) have used SBRT and 47 institutions (55%) have not used SBRT. Regarding the treatment site, the lung (92%) and liver (76%) were the two most common sites. The most common schedules were 60 Gy/4 fractions for non-small cell lung cancer, 48 Gy/4 fractions for lung metastases, 60 Gy/3 fractions for hepatocellular carcinoma, and 45 Gy/3 fractions or 40 Gy/4 fractions for liver metastases. Four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was the most common method for planning CT (74%). During planning CT, the most common method of immobilization was the use of an alpha cradle/vacuum-lock (42%).
Conclusion
Based on this survey, conduct of further prospective studies will be needed in order to determine the appropriate prescribed doses and to standardize the practice of SBRT.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Five-Day Spacing of Two Fractionated Ablative Radiotherapies Enhances Antitumor Immunity Hyunkyung Kim, Eunju Lee, Haeun Cho, Eunji Kim, Won Il Jang, Kwangmo Yang, Yoon-Jin Lee, Tae-Jin Kim, Mi-Sook Kim International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2024; 118(2): 498. CrossRef
Patterns of quality assurance and treatment planning for stereotactic body radiation therapy in India – A survey Smriti Sharma, Ritu Raj Upreti, Rajesh A. Kinhikar, G. Sahani, P. K. Dash Sharma Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2024; 20(6): 1752. CrossRef
Measuring dose in lung identifies peripheral tumour dose inaccuracy in SBRT audit Maddison Shaw, Jessica Lye, Andrew Alves, Joerg Lehmann, Masoumeh Sanagou, Moshi Geso, Rhonda Brown Physica Medica.2023; 112: 102632. CrossRef
Stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Expanding the multidisciplinary armamentarium Mihir D Shanker, Howard Y Liu, Yoo Young Lee, Katherine A Stuart, Elizabeth E Powell, Alan Wigg, David I Pryor Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2021; 36(4): 873. CrossRef
A national survey on technology and quality assurance for stereotactic body radiation therapy Carmelo Marino, Cristina Garibaldi, Ivan Veronese, Claudia Carbonini, Serenella Russo, Michele Stasi, Pietro Mancosu Physica Medica.2019; 65: 6. CrossRef
Clinical Practice Patterns of Radiotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group Study (KROG 14-07) Hyejung Cha, Hee Chul Park, Jeong Il Yu, Tae Hyun Kim, Taek-Keun Nam, Sang Min Yoon, Won Sup Yoon, Jun Won Kim, Mi Sook Kim, Hong Seok Jang, Youngmin Choi, Jin Hee Kim, Chul Seung Kay, Inkyung Jung, Jinsil Seong Cancer Research and Treatment.2017; 49(1): 61. CrossRef
Application of stereotactic body radiation therapy to cancer liver metastasis Si-Yuan Zhang, Guang-Ying Zhu, Gong Li, Yi-Bao Zhang, Jian-Hao Geng Cancer Letters.2016; 379(2): 225. CrossRef
Practical patterns for stereotactic body radiotherapy to hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: a survey of the Korean Stereotactic Radiosurgery Group Sun Hyun Bae, Mi-Sook Kim, Won Il Jang, Chul-Seung Kay, Woochul Kim, Eun Seog Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Jin Hee Kim, Kwang Mo Yang, Kyu Chan Lee, A Ram Chang, Sunmi Jo Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2016; 46(4): 363. CrossRef
Radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary treatment of liver cancer: a survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology Francesco Dionisi, Alessia Guarneri, Veronica Dell’Acqua, Mariacristina Leonardi, Rita Niespolo, Gabriella Macchia, Tiziana Comito, Maurizio Amichetti, Pierfrancesco Franco, Savino Cilla, Luciana Caravatta, Filippo Alongi, Giovanna Mantello La radiologia medica.2016; 121(9): 735. CrossRef
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a newly developed technique currently in clinical use. SBRT originated from stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial tumors. SBRT has been widely used clinically for lung cancer. The practice of SBRT demands different kinds of patient fixation, breathing control, target determination, treatment planning, and verifications. The history and current standard technique are reviewed. Clinical studies of lung cancer showed high local control rates with acceptable toxicities. Past and on-going clinical trials are reviewed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Evaluating the linear accelerator accuracy: Integrating Winston-Lutz measurement method and mathematical calculations Hsi-Ya Chao, Wen-Tyng Li, Chih-Chia Chang, Yuk-Wah Tsang Radiation Physics and Chemistry.2024; 217: 111504. CrossRef
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in Pain Relief for Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Xing Song, Jun Wei, Rui Sun, Wenjie Jiang, Yuan Chen, Yingjie Shao, Wendong Gu International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2023; 115(4): 909. CrossRef
Biological Principles of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Stereotactic Radiation Surgery (SRS): Indirect Cell Death Chang W. Song, Eli Glatstein, Lawrence B. Marks, Bahman Emami, Jimm Grimm, Paul W. Sperduto, Mi-Sook Kim, Susanta Hui, Kathryn E. Dusenbery, L. Chinsoo Cho International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 110(1): 21. CrossRef
Improved Survival Outcomes in Medically Fit Patients With Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Jason Liu, Caressa Hui, Colton Ladbury, Thomas Waddington, Loretta Erhunmwunsee, Dan Raz, Jae Kim, Ravi Salgia, Stafford Chenery, Daryl Pearlstein, Amanda Schwer, Arya Amini Clinical Lung Cancer.2021; 22(5): e678. CrossRef
Optimization of irradiation interval for fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery by a cellular automata model with reoxygenation effects Daisuke Kawahara, Lin Wu, Yoichi Watanabe Physics in Medicine & Biology.2020; 65(8): 085008. CrossRef
Effets de l’irradiation à haute dose sur la vascularisation : physiopathologie et conséquences cliniques A. Nivet, M. Schlienger, P. Clavère, F. Huguet Cancer/Radiothérapie.2019; 23(2): 161. CrossRef
Reoxygenation and Repopulation of Tumor Cells after Ablative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy (SBRT and SRS) in Murine Tumors Chang W. Song, Robert J. Griffin, Yoon-Jin Lee, Haeun Cho, Jewoo Seo, Inhwan Park, Hyun K. Kim, Do H. Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Kathryn E. Dusenbery, L. Chinsoo Cho Radiation Research.2019; 192(2): 159. CrossRef
Role of HIF-1α in response of tumors to a combination of hyperthermia and radiation in vivo Wonwoo Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Hee-jong Kim, Eunjin Lee, Jae-hoon Jeong, Inhwan Park, Youn Kyoung Jeong, Won Il Jang International Journal of Hyperthermia.2018; 34(3): 276. CrossRef
Focal exposure of limited lung volumes to high-dose irradiation down-regulated organ development-related functions and up-regulated the immune response in mouse pulmonary tissues Bu-Yeo Kim, Hee Jin, Yoon-Jin Lee, Ga-Young Kang, Jaeho Cho, Yun-Sil Lee BMC Genetics.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Real-time Tumor Oxygenation Changes After Single High-dose Radiation Therapy in Orthotopic and Subcutaneous Lung Cancer in Mice: Clinical Implication for Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Schedule Optimization Changhoon Song, Beom-Ju Hong, Seoyeon Bok, Chan-Ju Lee, Young-Eun Kim, Sang-Rok Jeon, Hong-Gyun Wu, Yun-Sang Lee, Gi Jeong Cheon, Jin Chul Paeng, David J. Carlson, Hak Jae Kim, G-One Ahn International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2016; 95(3): 1022. CrossRef
The impact of emphysema on dosimetric parameters for stereotactic body radiotherapy of the lung Satoru Ochiai, Yoshihito Nomoto, Yasufumi Yamashita, Tomoki Inoue, Shuuichi Murashima, Daisuke Hasegawa, Yoshie Kurita, Yui Watanabe, Yutaka Toyomasu, Tomoko Kawamura, Akinori Takada, Noriko Ii, Shigeki Kobayashi, Hajime Sakuma Journal of Radiation Research.2016; 57(5): 555. CrossRef
Indirect Tumor Cell Death After High-Dose Hypofractionated Irradiation: Implications for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiation Surgery Chang W. Song, Yoon-Jin Lee, Robert J. Griffin, Inhwan Park, Nathan A. Koonce, Susanta Hui, Mi-Sook Kim, Kathryn E. Dusenbery, Paul W. Sperduto, L. Chinsoo Cho International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2015; 93(1): 166. CrossRef
Radiation-induced organizing pneumonia after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumor Satoru Ochiai, Yoshihito Nomoto, Yasufumi Yamashita, Shuuichi Murashima, Daisuke Hasegawa, Yusuke Kurobe, Yutaka Toyomasu, Tomoko Kawamura, Akinori Takada, Noriko II Journal of Radiation Research.2015; 56(6): 904. CrossRef
Radiobiological mechanisms of stereotactic body radiation therapy and stereotactic radiation surgery Mi-Sook Kim, Wonwoo Kim, In Hwan Park, Hee Jong Kim, Eunjin Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung, Lawrence Chinsoo Cho, Chang W. Song Radiation Oncology Journal.2015; 33(4): 265. CrossRef
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using a Radiobiology-Based Regimen for Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Five-Year Mature Results Yuta Shibamoto, Chisa Hashizume, Fumiya Baba, Shiho Ayakawa, Akifumi Miyakawa, Taro Murai, Taiki Takaoka, Yukiko Hattori, Ryuji Asai Journal of Thoracic Oncology.2015; 10(6): 960. CrossRef
Radiobiological basis of SBRT and SRS Chang W. Song, Mi-Sook Kim, L. Chinsoo Cho, Kathryn Dusenbery, Paul W. Sperduto International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2014; 19(4): 570. CrossRef
Recent advances in radiation oncology Yasushi Nagata International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2014; 19(4): 563. CrossRef
Current and emerging strategies to increase the efficacy of ionizing radiation in the treatment of cancer Anthony J Berdis Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery.2014; 9(2): 167. CrossRef
Radiation Oncology: Physics Advances that Minimize Morbidity Ron R Allison, Rajen M Patel, Robert A McLawhorn Future Oncology.2014; 10(15): 2329. CrossRef
A compelling body of non-randomized evidence has established stereotactic ablative lung radiotherapy (SABR) as a standard of care for medically inoperable patients with peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This convenient outpatient therapy, which is typically delivered in 3-8 fractions, is also well tolerated by elderly and frail patients, makes efficient use of resources and is feasible using standard commercial equipment. The introduction of lung SABR into large populations has led to an increased utilization of radiotherapy, a reduction in the proportion of untreated patients and an increase in overall survival. In selected patients, the same ablative technology can now achieve durable local control of NSCLC metastases in a variety of common locations including the adrenal glands, bone, brain, and liver. At the same time as this, advances in prognostic molecular markers and targeted systemic therapies mean that there is now a subgroup of patients with stage IV NSCLC and a median survival of around 2 years. This creates opportunities for new trials that incorporate SABR and patient-specific systemic strategies. This selective mini-review focuses on the emerging role of SABR in patients with early-stage and oligometastatic NSCLC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Navigating patient journey in early diagnosis of lung cancer in India Bivas Biswas, Deepak Talwar, Priti Meshram, Pramod K. Julka, Anurag Mehta, SP Somashekhar, Srinivas Chilukuri, Abhishek Bansal Lung India.2023; 40(1): 48. CrossRef
Design, Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Nitroimidazole Radiosensitisers Lydia P. Liew, Avik Shome, Way W. Wong, Cho R. Hong, Kevin O. Hicks, Stephen M. F. Jamieson, Michael P. Hay Molecules.2023; 28(11): 4457. CrossRef
Breast Metastasis of Lung Cancer After Computed Tomography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: A Case Report Rong Zhao, Jun Xing, Jinnan Gao Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in oligometastatic/oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer patients: Results of a multi-institutional series of 198 patients treated with “curative” intent Michela Buglione, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Marco Lorenzo Bonù, Davide Franceschini, Andrei Fodor, Isa Bossi Zanetti, Marianna Alessandra Gerardi, Paolo Borghetti, Davide Tomasini, Nadia Gisella Di Muzio, Olga Oneta, Marta Scorsetti, Ciro Franzese, P Lung Cancer.2020; 141: 1. CrossRef
Staging Lung Cancer Girish S. Shroff, Chitra Viswanathan, Brett W. Carter, Marcelo F. Benveniste, Mylene T. Truong, Bradley S. Sabloff Radiologic Clinics of North America.2018; 56(3): 411. CrossRef
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Primer for Radiologists Jennifer A. Febbo, Ramya S. Gaddikeri, Palmi N. Shah RadioGraphics.2018; 38(5): 1312. CrossRef
Preliminary comparison of the registration effect of 4D-CBCT and 3D-CBCT in image-guided radiotherapy of Stage IA non–small-cell lung cancer Zhibo Tan, Chuanyao Liu, Ying Zhou, Weixi Shen Journal of Radiation Research.2017; 58(6): 854. CrossRef
Narcissus, the Beam, and lung cancer Gaetano Rocco The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2016; 152(2): 338. CrossRef
Efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases using dynamic jaws technology in the helical tomotherapy system Taro Murai, Akihiro Hayashi, Yoshihiko Manabe, Chikao Sugie, Taiki Takaoka, Takeshi Yanagi, Tetsuya Oguri, Masayuki Matsuo, Yoshimasa Mori, Yuta Shibamoto The British Journal of Radiology.2016; 89(1066): 20160374. CrossRef
Targeting tumour hypoxia to prevent cancer metastasis. From biology, biosensing and technology to drug development: the METOXIA consortium Erik O. Pettersen, Peter Ebbesen, Roben G. Gieling, Kaye J. Williams, Ludwig Dubois, Philippe Lambin, Carol Ward, James Meehan, Ian H. Kunkler, Simon P. Langdon, Anne H. Ree, Kjersti Flatmark, Heidi Lyng, Maria J. Calzada, Luis del Peso, Manuel O. Landazu Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry.2015; 30(5): 689. CrossRef
Monte Carlo validation of the TrueBeam 10XFFF phase–space files for applications in lung SABR Tony Teke, Cheryl Duzenli, Alanah Bergman, Francis Viel, Parmveer Atwal, Ermias Gete Medical Physics.2015; 42(12): 6863. CrossRef
Stratégies d’évaluation de la réponse après irradiation stéréotaxique des cancers bronchiques primitifs et des métastases pulmonaires I. Barillot, O. Munier, M. Hatime, F. Mornex Cancer/Radiothérapie.2014; 18(4): 308. CrossRef
Short-Course Treatment With Gefitinib Enhances Curative Potential of Radiation Therapy in a Mouse Model of Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Sivan M. Bokobza, Yanyan Jiang, Anika M. Weber, Aoife M. Devery, Anderson J. Ryan International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2014; 88(4): 947. CrossRef
Can an alternative backround-corrected [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) standard uptake value (SUV) be used for monitoring tumor local control following lung cancer stereotactic body radiosurgery? Charles Shang, Michael Kasper, Vindu Kathriarachchi, Rashmi Benda, Joseph Kleinman, Jeremy Cole, Timothy Williams International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology.2014; 2(3): 020317. CrossRef
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: Present status and future perspectives N.H. Rekers, E.G.C. Troost, C.M.L. Zegers, W.T.V. Germeraad, L.J. Dubois, P. Lambin Cancer/Radiothérapie.2014; 18(5-6): 391. CrossRef
Cáncer de pulmón P. Resano Barrio, Y. Anta Mejía Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado.2014; 11(67): 3983. CrossRef
Increasing Use of Advanced Radiation Therapy Technologies in the Last 30 Days of Life Among Patients Dying As a Result of Cancer in the United States B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Kai-Ping Liao, Sharon H. Giordano, Linda S. Elting, Thomas A. Buchholz, Ya-Chen Tina Shih Journal of Oncology Practice.2014; 10(4): e269. CrossRef
Extra-thoracic tumor burden but not thoracic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent prognostic biomarker for extensive-disease small cell lung cancer Jong-Ryool Oh, Ji-Hyoung Seo, Chae Moon Hong, Shin Young Jeong, Sang-Woo Lee, Jaetae Lee, Jung-Joon Min, Ho-Chun Song, Hee-Seung Bom, Young-Chul Kim, Byeong-Cheol Ahn Lung Cancer.2013; 81(2): 218. CrossRef
Changing trends in radiation therapy technologies in the last year of life for patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer in the United States B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Jinhai Huo, Kai‐Ping Liao, Thomas A. Buchholz, Prajnan Das Cancer.2013; 119(5): 1089. CrossRef
Escaping death to quiescence: Avoiding mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage Zhiyuan Shen, Steven C. Huhn, Bruce G. Haffty Cell Cycle.2013; 12(11): 1664. CrossRef
CyberKnife robotic image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastic cancer B.A. Jereczek-Fossa, I. Bossi-Zanetti, R. Mauro, G. Beltramo, L. Fariselli, L.C. Bianchi, C. Fodor, P. Fossati, G. Baroni, R. Orecchia Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.2013; 189(6): 448. CrossRef
The development of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer: an international phenomenon Gregory M. M. Videtic Journal of Radiation Oncology.2012; 1(1): 3. CrossRef
Improving lung cancer survival; time to move on Marlies E Heuvers, Joost P Hegmans, Bruno H Stricker, Joachim G Aerts BMC Pulmonary Medicine.2012;[Epub] CrossRef
Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) – Can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review of the literature Kitty Huang, Max Dahele, Suresh Senan, Matthias Guckenberger, George B. Rodrigues, Aaron Ward, R. Gabriel Boldt, David A. Palma Radiotherapy and Oncology.2012; 102(3): 335. CrossRef
Dae Yong Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Jung Il Lee, Do Hyun Nam, Jeong Eun Lee, Do Hoon Lim, Inhwan J Yeo, Seung Jae Huh, Young Joo Noh, Hyung Jin Shin, Kwan Park, Jong Hyun Kim
PURPOSE To assess the radiologic response and cranial nerve morbidity in intracranial schwannoma patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-six patients with intracranial schwannoma were treated with linear accelerator- based SRS or FSRT between February 1995 and October 1999.
The origin of schwannoma was acoustic nerve in twenty-one patients, facial nerve in two, trigeminal nerve in two, and glossopharyngeal nerve in one. SRS were performed with the median peripheral dose of 14 Gy (range 12-16), and FSRT were done with the median peripheral dose of 25 2 Gy (range 50-60). RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 33 months (range 12-67), the local control rate was 100%. Tumorregression was noted in eleven patients, and tumor stabilization was found in the remaining fifteen. Useful hearing preservation was achieved in two of three patients. Facial nerve neuropathy was shown in two patients and one patients developed trigeminal nerve neuropathy. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiotherapy including SRS and FSRT provided excellent local control in intracranial schwannoma.
It shows the possibility of a high rate of hearing preservation and an acceptable neurotoxicity, although the number of patients are small and follow-up is relatively short.
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and frac- tionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for metastatic brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nineteen patients with brain metastases (34 lesions) were treated with LINAC-based SRS or FSRT with or without whole brain radiotherapy between October 1995 and February 1998. SRS was preferred to FSRT in cases with three or more lesions and poor performance status. FSRT was preferred to SRS in cases with lesions larger than 3 cm and lesions located near or at the eloquent areas such as thalamus, brain stem, and optic apparatus. Single isocenter was used both in SRS and FSRT, and the median peripheral dose in SRS was 15 Gy (range 13~20 Gy), while that in FSRT was 21 Gy (range 15~24 Gy) by 3 Gy per fraction. RESULTS Local control was achieved in 79% (27/34 treated lesions) and 1-year over- all survival rate was 58% with the median survival of 12 months. Lethal progressive brain metastases, both local and regional, were in four patients (27% of all deaths). No significant differences in local control and survival was observed with histology, age, sex, performance status, tumor volume, number of lesions, or treatment modality. Unacceptable acute or late complications did not occur. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiotherapy including SRS and FSRT is effective, non-invasive therapy for brain metastases. This study suggests that stereotactic radiotherapy might be an alternative to surgical resection in selected patients of brain metastases.