Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Radical prostatectomy"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
Dong Wook Shin, Sang Hyub Lee, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Joong Yun, Jong Kil Nam, Seung Hyun Jeon, Seung Chol Park, Seung Il Jung, Jong-Hyock Park, Jinsung Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):556-567.   Published online July 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.221
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) information related to radical prostatectomy (RP) is valuable for prostate cancer (PC) patients needing to make treatment decisions. We aimed to investigate HRQOL change in PC patients who underwent three types of RP (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) and compared their HRQOL with that of general population.
Materials and Methods
Patients were prospectively recruited between October 2014 and December 2015. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and PC-specific module (PR25) were administered before surgery (baseline) and at postoperative 3 and 12 months. At each time point, HRQOL was compared, and a difference of 10 out of 0-100 scale was considered clinically significant.
Results
Among 258 screened patients, 209 (41 open, 63 laparoscopic, and 105 robotic surgeries) were included. Compared to baseline, physical, emotional, and cognitive functioning improved at 12 months. Role functioning worsened at 3 months, but recovered to baseline at 12 months. Pain, insomnia, diarrhea, and financial difficulties also significantly improved at 12 months. Most PR25 scales excluding bowel symptoms deteriorated at 3 months. Urinary symptoms and incontinence aid recovered at 12 months, whereas sexual activity and sexual function remained poor at 12 months. Clinically meaningful differences in HRQOL were not observed according to RP modalities. Compared to the general population, physical and role functioning were significantly lower at 3 months, but recovered by 12 months. Social functioning did not recover.
Conclusion
Most HRQOL domains showed recovery within 12 months after RP, excluding sexual functioning and social functioning. Our findings may guide patients considering surgical treatment for PC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes Among Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review
    Koku Sisay Tamirat, Michael James Leach, Nathan Papa, Jeremy Millar, Eli Ristevski
    Current Oncology Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality of life after robotic versus conventional minimally invasive cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Russell Seth Martins, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Omar Mahmud, Muhammad Umar Mahar, Arshia Jahangir, Kinza Jawed, Shalni Golani, Ayra Siddiqui, Syed Roohan Aamir, Ali Ahmad
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Discharge Education and Post-Discharge Telephone Counseling on Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
    İpek Köse Tosunöz, Sevgi Deniz Doğan, Şeyma Yurtseven, Sevban Arslan
    Cukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi.2024; 7(3): 205.     CrossRef
  • Health‐related quality of life the first year after a prostate cancer diagnosis a systematic review
    Louise Dorner Østergaard, Mads Hvid Poulsen, Malene Eiberg Jensen, Lars Lund, Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt, Birgitte Nørgaard
    International Journal of Urological Nursing.2023; 17(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative Analysis of Quality of Life and Exploration of Influencing Factors in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Feiyang Wang, Jiajun Chen, Weihao Wang, Mengyao Li, Chao Peng, Shouhua Pan, Chuanchuan Zhan, Keyuan Zhao, Yulei Li, Lulu Zhang, Gang Xu, Jing Jin
    Urology.2023; 181: 105.     CrossRef
  • Effects of omega‐3 supplementation on psychological symptoms in men with prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of a double‐blind placebo‐controlled randomized trial
    Josée Savard, Hanane Moussa, Jean‐François Pelletier, Pierre Julien, Louis Lacombe, Rabi Tiguert, Yves Caumartin, Thierry Dujardin, Paul Toren, Frédéric Pouliot, Michele Lodde, Yves Fradet, Karine Robitaille, Vincent Fradet
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(19): 20163.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Outcomes and Its Associated Factors Among Adult Patients with Selected Solid Malignancies at Kenyatta National Hospital: A Hospital-Based Prospective Cohort Study
    Amsalu Degu, Ermias Mergia Terefe, Eliab Seroney Some, Gobezie T Tegegne
    Cancer Management and Research.2022; Volume 14: 1525.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of supervised comprehensive functional physiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
    B. Steenstrup, M. Cartier, F.X. Nouhaud, G. Kerdelhue, M. Gilliaux
    Progrès en Urologie.2022; 32(7): 525.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative psychological issues and nursing care among patients undergoing minimally invasive surgeries
    Kehua Yang, Xu Shao, Xinghui Lv, Feimin Yang, Qunyan Shen, Jing Fang, Wei Chen
    Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2022; 5(3): 92.     CrossRef
  • A Survey on the Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Patients in Korean Prostate Cancer Patients Association
    Yun-Sok Ha, Kwang Taek Kim, Wook Nam, Hongzoo Park, Sangjun Yoo, Chan Ho Lee, Ho Seok Chung, Woo Suk Choi, Jiyoun Kim, Jaeeun Shin, Jeong Hyun Kim, Cheol Kwak
    The Korean Journal of Urological Oncology.2022; 20(4): 265.     CrossRef
  • Effects of leuprolide acetate on the quality of life of patients with prostate cancer: A prospective longitudinal cohort study
    Myung Soo Kim, Seung Il Jung, Ho Seok Chung, Eu Chang Hwang, Dongdeuk Kwon
    Prostate International.2021; 9(3): 132.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life assessment using EORTC QLQ questionnaires in the prostate cancer population treated with radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
    Tomasz Jurys, Jacek Durmala
    Scandinavian Journal of Urology.2021; 55(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Évaluation de l’observance et de l’adhésion thérapeutique de deux protocoles de rééducation après prostatectomie
    Benoit Steenstrup, Claire Breton, Guillaume Galliou, François-Xavier Nouhaud
    Kinésithérapie, la Revue.2021; 21(234): 12.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome, levels of androgens, and changes of erectile dysfunction and quality of life impairment 1 year after radical prostatectomy
    Yann Neuzillet, Mathieu Rouanne, Jean-François Dreyfus, Jean-Pierre Raynaud, Marc Schneider, Morgan Roupret, Sarah Drouin, Marc Galiano, Xavier Cathelinau, Thierry Lebret, Henry Botto
    Asian Journal of Andrology.2021; 23(4): 370.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Post-prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence on Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Jeong Hyun Kim, Yeon Soo Jang, Young Deuk Choi, Eui Geum Oh
    Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2019; 31(3): 293.     CrossRef
  • Prostate-specific health-related quality of life and patient-physician communication — A 3.5-year follow-up
    Nicole Ernstmann, Jan Herden, Lothar Weissbach, André Karger, Kira Hower, Lena Ansmann
    Patient Education and Counseling.2019; 102(11): 2114.     CrossRef
  • 10,451 View
  • 298 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Review Article
Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients with PSA Relapse Following Radical Prostatectomy: Issues and Challenges
Richard Choo
Cancer Res Treat. 2010;42(1):1-11.   Published online March 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2010.42.1.1
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub

A progressively rising level of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) invariably indicates the recurrence of prostate cancer. The optimal management of patients with post-RP PSA relapse has remained uncertain due to a wide variability in the natural course of post-RP PSA relapse and the inability to separate a recurrent disease confined to the prostate bed from that with occult distant metastasis. Management uncertainty is further compounded by the lack of phase III clinical studies demonstrating which therapeutic approach, if any, would prolong life with no significant morbidity. Radiotherapy has been the main therapeutic modality with a curative potential for patients with post-RP PSA relapse. This review article depicts issues and challenges in the management of patients with post-RP PSA relapse, presents the literature data for the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy, either alone or in combination of androgen ablation therapy, and discusses future directions that can optimize treatment strategies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term clinical outcomes after salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Kenta Onishi, Yasushi Nakai, Fumisato Maesaka, Mitsuru Tomizawa, Takuto Shimizu, Shunta Hori, Daisuke Gotoh, Makito Miyake, Kazumasa Torimoto, Kaori Yamaki, Isao Asakawa, Fumiaki Isohashi, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Nobumichi Tanaka
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diospyros rhodocalyx Kurz induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis via BAX, Bcl-2, and caspase-3 pathways in LNCaP human prostate cancer cell line
    Chayisara Phongsuwichetsak, Thummaruk Suksrichavalit, Chawalit Chatupheeraphat, Warawan Eiamphungporn, Sakda Yainoy, Vichanan Yamkamon
    PeerJ.2024; 12: e17637.     CrossRef
  • Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Prostate Bed With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT): A Phase 2 Trial
    Elton Trigo Teixeira Leite, Clarissa Cerchi Angotti Ramos, Victor Augusto Bertotti Ribeiro, Bernardo Peres Salvajoli, William Carlos Nahas, João Victor Salvajoli, Fabio Ynoe Moraes
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 109(5): 1263.     CrossRef
  • Salvage Radiotherapy Management Decisions in Postprostatectomy Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer Based on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Guidance
    Olayinka A. Abiodun-Ojo, Ashesh B. Jani, Akinyemi A. Akintayo, Oladunni O. Akin-Akintayo, Oluwaseun A. Odewole, Funmilayo I. Tade, Shreyas S. Joshi, Viraj A. Master, Bridget Fielder, Raghuveer K. Halkar, Chao Zhang, Subir Goyal, Mark M. Goodman, David M.
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine.2021; 62(8): 1089.     CrossRef
  • Elective pelvic irradiation in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy: A propensity score matching analysis
    Changhoon Song, Sang Jun Byun, Young Seok Kim, Hanjong Ahn, Seok-Soo Byun, Choung-Soo Kim, Sang Eun Lee, Jae-Sung Kim, Christopher J.D. Wallis
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(4): e0215057.     CrossRef
  • Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial
    Christian Carrie, Nicolas Magné, Patricia Burban-Provost, Paul Sargos, Igor Latorzeff, Jean-Léon Lagrange, Stéphane Supiot, Yazid Belkacemi, Didier Peiffert, Nedla Allouache, Bernard M Dubray, Stéphanie Servagi-Vernat, Jean-Philippe Suchaud, Gilles Crehan
    The Lancet Oncology.2019; 20(12): 1740.     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of PSMA-based 18F–DCFBC PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after primary local therapy
    Esther Mena, Maria L. Lindenberg, Joanna H. Shih, Stephen Adler, Stephanie Harmon, Ethan Bergvall, Deborah Citrin, William Dahut, Anita T. Ton, Yolanda McKinney, Juanita Weaver, Philip Eclarinal, Alicia Forest, George Afari, Sibaprasad Bhattacharyya, Ronn
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2018; 45(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in radiation oncology: multimodal targeting of high risk and recurrent prostate cancer
    Young Kwok, Adeel Kaiser, Stephanie R. Rice, Randi Cohen, Mark Mishra
    Current Opinion in Oncology.2018; 30(3): 165.     CrossRef
  • Change in Salvage Radiotherapy Management Based on Guidance With FACBC (Fluciclovine) PET/CT in Postprostatectomy Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Oladunni O. Akin-Akintayo, Ashesh B. Jani, Oluwaseun Odewole, Funmilayo I. Tade, Peter T. Nieh, Viraj A. Master, Leah M. Bellamy, Raghuveer K. Halkar, Chao Zhang, Zhengjia Chen, Mark M. Goodman, David M. Schuster
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2017; 42(1): e22.     CrossRef
  • The Trend of Uro-Oncologist About Blood Test and Imaging Studies for the Diagnosis of Biochemical Recurrence in Korea
    Sung Pil Seo, Won Tae Kim, Ho Won Kang, Yong-June Kim, Sang-Cheol Lee, Wun-Jae Kim, So Young Kim, Jong-Hyock Park, Seok Joong Yun
    The Korean Journal of Urological Oncology.2017; 15(3): 131.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy alone in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Wan Song, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Hyun Hwan Sung, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Han Yong Choi, Hyun Moo Lee
    International Journal of Urology.2016; 23(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial
    Christian Carrie, Ali Hasbini, Guy de Laroche, Pierre Richaud, Stéphane Guerif, Igor Latorzeff, Stéphane Supiot, Mathieu Bosset, Jean-Léon Lagrange, Véronique Beckendorf, François Lesaunier, Bernard Dubray, Jean-Philippe Wagner, Tan Dat N'Guyen, Jean-Phil
    The Lancet Oncology.2016; 17(6): 747.     CrossRef
  • Image Guided Planning for Prostate Carcinomas With Incorporation of Anti-3-[18F]FACBC (Fluciclovine) Positron Emission Tomography: Workflow and Initial Findings From a Randomized Trial
    Eduard Schreibmann, David M. Schuster, Peter J. Rossi, Joseph Shelton, Sherrie Cooper, Ashesh B. Jani
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2016; 96(1): 206.     CrossRef
  • Detection of a second malignancy in prostate cancer patients by using [18F]Choline PET/CT: a case series
    Martina Sollini, Francesco Pasqualetti, Marzio Perri, Gabriele Coraggio, Paolo Castellucci, Massimo Roncali, Roberto Boni, Elena Lazzeri, Maria Galeandro, Fabiola Paiar, Annibale Versari, Paola Anna Erba
    Cancer Imaging.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Radiosensitization by the investigational NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924 (pevonedistat) in hormone-resistant prostate cancer cells
    Xiaofang Wang, Wenjuan Zhang, Zi Yan, Yupei Liang, Lihui Li, Xiaoli Yu, Yan Feng, Shen Fu, Yanmei Zhang, Hu Zhao, Jinha Yu, Lak Shin Jeong, Xiaomao Guo, Lijun Jia
    Oncotarget.2016; 7(25): 38380.     CrossRef
  • Current status and outcomes of patients developing PSA recurrence after prostatectomy who were treated with salvage radiotherapy: a JROSG surveillance study
    Takashi Mizowaki, Manabu Aoki, Katsumasa Nakamura, Atsunori Yorozu, Masaki Kokubo, Katsuyuki Karasawa, Takuyo Kozuka, Nobuaki Nakajima, Keisuke Sasai, Tetsuo Akimoto
    Journal of Radiation Research.2015; 56(4): 750.     CrossRef
  • Utilization of PSA measurement at three months following salvage radiation therapy to predict future biochemical outcome
    Michael G. Heckman, Katherine S. Tzou, Colleen S. Thomas, Thomas M. Pisansky, Steven E. Schild, William W. Wong, Richard J. Lee, Melanie C. Bois, Waleed Brinjikji, Jennifer L. Peterson, Larry C. Daugherty, Stephen J. Ko, Steven J. Buskirk
    Journal of Radiation Oncology.2014; 3(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • Anti-3-[ 18 F]FACBC Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Tomography and 111 In-Capromab Pendetide Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography-Computerized Tomography for Recurrent Prosta
    David M. Schuster, Peter T. Nieh, Ashesh B. Jani, Rianot Amzat, F. DuBois Bowman, Raghuveer K. Halkar, Viraj A. Master, Jonathon A. Nye, Oluwaseun A. Odewole, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Bital Savir-Baruch, Pooneh Alaei-Taleghani, Mark M. Goodman
    Journal of Urology.2014; 191(5): 1446.     CrossRef
  • Salvage Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Local Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: Our First three Patients
    Emilio Gastaldi, Fabrizio Gallo, Luciano Chiono, Claudio Giberti
    Urologia Journal.2014; 81(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Lack of association between COX-2 staining level and biochemical recurrence following salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer
    Michael G. Heckman, Katherine S. Tzou, Alexander S. Parker, Thomas M. Pisansky, Steven E. Schild, Tracy W. Hilton, Vivek N. Patel, Liset Pelaez, Li Yan Khor, Jennifer L. Peterson, Larry C. Daugherty, Laura A. Vallow, Alan Pollack, Steven J. Buskirk
    Journal of Radiation Oncology.2013; 2(3): 309.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of men with rising prostate-specific antigen levels following radical prostatectomy
    Katherine Tzou, Winston W Tan, Steven Buskirk
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2011; 11(1): 125.     CrossRef
  • Detection of Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma withanti-1-Amino-3-18F-Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid PET/CT and111In–Capromab Pendetide SPECT/CT
    David M. Schuster, Bital Savir-Baruch, Peter T. Nieh, Viraj A. Master, Raghuveer K. Halkar, Peter J. Rossi, Melinda M. Lewis, Jonathon A. Nye, Weiping Yu, F. DuBois Bowman, Mark M. Goodman
    Radiology.2011; 259(3): 852.     CrossRef
  • EUS-guided fiducial placement after radical prostatectomy before targeted radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence
    Julie Yang, May Abdel-Wahab, Afonso Ribeiro
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2011; 73(6): 1302.     CrossRef
  • 13,225 View
  • 86 Download
  • 23 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Biopsy Related Prostate Status Does Not Affect on the Clinicopathological Outcome of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Hoon Choi, Young Hwii Ko, Sung Gu Kang, Seok Ho Kang, Hong Seok Park, Jun Cheon, Vipul R. Patel
Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41(4):205-210.   Published online December 31, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2009.41.4.205
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

To determine whether the biopsy core number and time interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the operative and oncologic outcome of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

Materials and Methods

From January 2008 to April 2009, a single surgeon performed 72 RALPs after an initial learning period of 30 cases. The relationship between time from biopsy to prostatectomy and biopsy core number with operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) were initially evaluated with a linear regression model. These patients were classified into groups according to whether the interval from biopsy to RALP was within four weeks or not, and whether there were less than or greater than 10 core specimens removed.

Results

RALP was performed in 34 patients within four weeks of biopsy, and in 38 patients more than 4 weeks after biopsy. According to the number of core specimens removed, less than 10 cores were performed in 10 patients, and more than 10 cores were performed in 62 patients. Using an interval of 4 weeks as the cutoff point, early surgery was associated with longer operating time (232.6 vs 208.8 min) and increased estimated blood loss (305.1 vs 276.9 mL). For cases with more than 10 biopsy cores, there was a slight increase in operative time (229.2 vs 210.3 min). None of these differences were statistically significant by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Our data suggests that there is no reason to delay RALP to more than 4 weeks after prostate biopsy. It also revealed that the number of biopsy cores (up to 14) did not influence operative outcome. Thus, RALP is a feasible procedure regardless of the biopsy related prostate state.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Prostate Biopsy on the Quality of Hydrogel Spacer Placement in Men Prior to Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Michael E. Rezaee, Ulysses Gardner, Mark N. Alshak, Stephen C. Greco, Daniel Y. Song, Michael Goldstein, Christian P. Pavlovich
    Urology.2023; 182: 27.     CrossRef
  • Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jie Li, Qing Jiang, Qiubo Li, Yuanfeng Zhang, Liang Gao
    International Urology and Nephrology.2020; 52(4): 619.     CrossRef
  • Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes
    Minke He, Yaohui Li, Zhuoyi Xiang, Li-an Sun, Yanjun Zhu, Xiaoyi Hu, Jianming Guo, Hang Wang
    Medicine.2018; 97(36): e11686.     CrossRef
  • A Multidimensional Analysis of Prostate Surgery Costs in the United States: Robotic-Assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy
    Akash Bijlani, April E. Hebert, Mike Davitian, Holly May, Mark Speers, Robert Leung, Nihal E. Mohamed, Henry S. Sacks, Ashutosh Tewari
    Value in Health.2016; 19(4): 391.     CrossRef
  • Interval from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Affect Immediate Operative Outcomes for Open or Minimally Invasive Approach
    Bumsoo Park, Seol Ho Choo, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Han Yong Choi
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2014; 29(12): 1688.     CrossRef
  • Interval from Prostate Biopsy to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALP): Effects on Surgical Difficulties
    In Sung Kim, Woong Na, Jung Su Nam, Jong Jin Oh, Chang Wook Jeong, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok Soo Byun, Sang Eun Lee
    Korean Journal of Urology.2011; 52(10): 664.     CrossRef
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen Density as a Powerful Predictor of Extracapsular Extension and Positive Surgical Margin in Radical Prostatectomy Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels of Less than 10 ng/ml
    Jin-Seok Chang, Hoon Choi, Young-Seop Chang, Jin-Bum Kim, Mi Mi Oh, Du Geon Moon, Jae Hyun Bae, Jun Cheon
    Korean Journal of Urology.2011; 52(12): 809.     CrossRef
  • 9,631 View
  • 51 Download
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP