Purpose
Quality assessment of breast cancer treatment in South Korea showed the upward standardization of the grade since 2013, but treatment disparities still have existed. This study analyzed the five year trend between 2013 and 2017 in the assessment of breast cancer treatment practice using the Korean health insurance data.
Materials and Methods
All the medical records including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for 7,354 patients a year on average were evaluated. Twenty indices were consisted of one structural, 17 process-related, and 2 result-related factors. We calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) annually to determine the variation in adherence rate of evaluation indices according to the type of institution (advanced vs. general hospital vs. clinic).
Results
Based on the initial assessment in 2013, 10 out of 20 indicators showed significant variation among the types of institutions with a CV of less than 0.1%. Six of them had a CV decline of less than 0.1%. The CV was still 0.1% or higher in the four indicators, including the composition of professional staff, the implementation of target therapy, the average length of hospital stay, and the hospitalization cost. Regarding the first-grade of assessment, there was a statistically significant relationship between the institution type (p=0.029) and region (metropolitan vs. province, p<0.001).
Conclusion
There were disparities in the structural and systemic treatment factors depending on the institutional type. The quality improvement of the regional institutions and multidisciplinary experts for breast cancer is necessary.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Exploring the experiences of cancer patients: What drives them to seek treatment outside their residential area and what are the experiences resulting from that decision? A qualitative study Jeehee Pyo, Mina Lee, Haneul Lee, Minsu Ock, Ali Haider Mohammed PLOS ONE.2025; 20(3): e0319650. CrossRef
Contrasting income-based inequalities in incidence and mortality of breast cancer in Korea, 2006-2015 Jinwook Bahk, Hee-Yeon Kang, Young-Ho Khang, Kyunghee Jung-Choi Epidemiology and Health.2024; 46: e2024074. CrossRef
Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in South Korea due to westernized eating habits and regular health check-ups. The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) has conducted a national quality assessment of the treatment of CRC. This study examined the quality assessment report of the Korean HIRA and analyzed the status of practice pattern and the epidemiology of CRC in South Korea.
Materials and Methods The number of subjects was determined based on the number of surgical procedures in each institution during 2012-2017. The institution types were classified according to the number of beds and the composition of oncologic specialists. Twenty-one indicators for diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, pathology, and mortality were analyzed and the interinstitutional variation for each indicator was calculated.
Results Among 21 evaluation indices, indicators related to medical records, receipt of chemotherapy with a high coefficient of variation of ≥ 0.1% were improved over 6 years until the survey in 2017. In the analysis of indices affecting surgical mortality, the regional lymph node resection and examination rate (p=0.022) showed a negative correlation with surgical mortality. Hospitalization stay (p < 0.001) and hospitalization cost (p=0.002) were positively correlated with surgical mortality.
Conclusion This study showed that the treatment quality and examination status for CRC in South Korea were appropriate for improving relevant medical records, receipt of chemotherapy, maintaining the quality of treatment, and mortality. These analyses could be the basis for developing an improved quality assessment program worldwide.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Exploring the experiences of cancer patients: What drives them to seek treatment outside their residential area and what are the experiences resulting from that decision? A qualitative study Jeehee Pyo, Mina Lee, Haneul Lee, Minsu Ock, Ali Haider Mohammed PLOS ONE.2025; 20(3): e0319650. CrossRef
Relationship between patient outcomes and patterns of fragmented cancer care in older adults with gastric cancer: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea Dong-Woo Choi, Seungju Kim, Sun Jung Kim, Dong Wook Kim, Kwang Sun Ryu, Jae Ho Kim, Yoon-Jung Chang, Kyu-Tae Han Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2024; 15(2): 101685. CrossRef
Effects of intensive care unit quality assessment on changes in medical staff in medical institutions and in-hospital mortality Seungju Kim, Gui Ok Kim, Syalrom Lee, Yong Uk Kwon Human Resources for Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality control efforts of medical institutions: the impacts of a value-based payment system on medical staff and healthcare-associated infections K-T. Han, S. Kim, G.O. Kim, S. Lee, Y.U. Kwon Journal of Hospital Infection.2024; 153: 3. CrossRef
Quality Assessment and Trend for Breast Cancer Treatment Practice across South Korea Based on Nationwide Analysis of Korean Health Insurance Data during 2013-2017 Kyu Hye Choi, Soo-Yoon Sung, Sea-Won Lee, Ye Won Jeon, Sung Hwan Kim, Jong Hoon Lee Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(2): 570. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32. CrossRef
Colorectal cancer mortality trends in the era of cancer survivorship in Korea: 2000–2020 Min Hyun Kim, Sanghee Park, Nari Yi, Bobae Kang, In Ja Park Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(5): 343. CrossRef
Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Korean National Health Insurance Database Woo Sik Yu, Mi Kyung Bae, Jung Kyu Choi, Young Ki Hong, In Kyu Park Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(4): 1104. CrossRef