Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Gonadotropin-releasing hormone"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy Compared to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors
Koung Jin Suh, Se Hyun Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Tae-Yong Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Sae-Won Han, Eunyoung Kang, Eun-Kyu Kim, Kidong Kim, Jae Hong No, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Seock-Ah Im, Jee Hyun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):1153-1163.   Published online February 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.463
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Although combining aromatase inhibitors (AI) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) is becoming more common, it is still not clear if GnRHa is as effective as bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO).
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed data of 66 premenopausal patients with hormone receptor– positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative recurrent and metastatic breast cancer who had been treated with AIs in combination with GnRHa or BSO between 2002 and 2015.
Results
The median patient age was 44 years. Overall, 24 (36%) received BSO and 42 (64%) received GnRHa. The clinical benefit rate was higher in the BSO group than in the GnRHa group (88% vs. 69%, p=0.092). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the BSO group, although statistical significance was not reached (17.2 months vs. 13.3 months, p=0.245). When propensity score matching was performed, the median PFS was 17.2 months for the BSO group and 8.2 months for the GnRHa group (p=0.137). Multivariate analyses revealed that the luminal B subtype (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.60; p=0.022) and later-line treatment (≥ third line vs. first line; hazard ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.59 to 6.59; p=0.001) were independent predictive factors for a shorter PFS. Incomplete ovarian suppression was observed in a subset of GnRHa-treated patients whose disease showed progression, with E2 levels higher than 21 pg/mL.
Conclusion
Both BSO and GnRHa were found to be effective in our AI-treated premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patient cohort. However, further studies in larger populations are needed to determine if BSO is superior to GnRHa.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Incomplete ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists
    Jinna Lin, Shuqi Zheng, Qiang Liu
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2025; 133: 102879.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian escape in premenopausal breast cancer: Challenges and strategies for optimizing hormone suppression
    Lan Luo, Yonglin Zhang, Li Zhang, Senguo Yang, Tian Zhou, Ke Luo, Shu Liu
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2025; 139: 102970.     CrossRef
  • A Comparative Study of Quality of Life and Oncologic Outcomes in Premenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Bilateral Oophorectomy vs. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy
    Evrim Erdemoglu, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Matthew R. Buras, Jaxon Quillen, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Laura M. Bozzuto, Nicole L. Larson, Johnny Yi, Kristina A. Butler
    Cancers.2025; 17(17): 2916.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Ovarian Suppression and Breast Cancer—What Do We Know About It?
    Angel Yordanov, Ihsan Hasan, Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva, Eva Tsoneva, Stoyan Kostov, Vesselina Yanachkova
    Medicina.2025; 61(11): 1905.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a retrospective single-center real-world study
    Yifei Chen, Ruyan Zhang, Ying Yan, Huiping Li, Guohong Song
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 206(3): 543.     CrossRef
  • Oophorectomy in Premenopausal Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: New Insights into Long-Term Effects
    Fatima Khan, Kristin Rojas, Matthew Schlumbrecht, Patricia Jeudin
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(2): 1794.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of outcomes in patients with luminal type breast cancer treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: A cohort retrospective study
    Dwi Ris Andriyanto, Prihantono, Salman Ardi Syamsu, Muhammad Ihwan Kusuma, Joko Hendarto, Indra, Nilam Smaradania, Elridho Sampepajung, Asrul Mappiwali, Muhammad Faruk
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Awareness of the Causes Leading to Surgical Ablation of Ovarian Function in Premenopausal Breast Cancer—A Single-Center Analysis
    Joana Correia Oliveira, Filipa Costa Sousa, Inês Gante, Margarida Figueiredo Dias
    Medicina.2021; 57(4): 385.     CrossRef
  • Long-term effect of repeated deslorelin acetate treatment in bitches for reproduction control
    Brändli SP, Palm J, Kowalewski MP, Reichler IM
    Theriogenology.2021; 173: 73.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HR+/HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review
    Gebra Cuyún Carter, Maitreyee Mohanty, Keri Stenger, Claudia Morato Guimaraes, Shivaprasad Singuru, Pradeep Basa, Sheena Singh, Vanita Tongbram, Sherko Kuemmel, Valentina Guarneri, Sara M Tolaney
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 6537.     CrossRef
  • Oophorectomy as a Hormonal Ablation Therapy in Metastatic and Recurrent Breast Cancer: Current Indications and Results
    Islam H. Metwally, Omar Hamdy, Saleh S. Elbalka, Mohamed Elbadrawy, Dina M. Elsaid
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2019; 10(3): 542.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Therapy for Premenopausal Women with HR+, HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer: Focus on Special Considerations and Latest Advances
    Aditya Bardia, Sara Hurvitz
    Clinical Cancer Research.2018; 24(21): 5206.     CrossRef
  • 15,366 View
  • 373 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in Human Uterine Endometrial and Ovarian Tissues
Jin Woo Kim, Sung Eun Namkoong
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1997;29(1):117-127.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (Gn-RH) can cause regression of hormonedependent human tumors, including uterine endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. These effects were thought to be mediated through the inhibition of gonadotropic and steroid hormone from the hypothalamus. But, in addition to its classic hypophysiotropic action, Gn-RH might play a role as a modulator of activity in the brain and many peripheral organs. It has been reported that this analog has a direct inhibitory effect on the tumor and that the specific binding sites for Gn-RH were demonstrated in certain tumors responsive to Gn-RH. In support of a possible clinical use of Gn-RH analogs in the treatment of the endometrial and ovarian carcinomas, we tried to find out whether Gn-RH receptors are present on hormone dependent tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We have studied endometrial and ovarian tumor specimens and established uterine endometrial and ovarian carcinoma cell lines for the presence of Gn-RH receptor by the detection of its messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA). We also compared the results obtained from tumor tissue specimens with the results from their corresponding normal tissues. Gn-RH receptor mRNA was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using oligonucleotide primers synthesized according to the published human Gn-RH receptor sequence.
RESULTS
Gn-RH receptor mRNA was detected in all normal endometrium and abnormally proliferative endometrium presenting dysfunctional bleeding, but not all in endometrial carcinomas (83%). Tumor stage and histologic grading had no relationship with receptor positivity. And, Gn-RH receptor mRNA was detected in less than 40% in normal myometrium and myomas. Gn-RH receptor expression was detected in same frequencies (86%) in normal ovarian tissues and ovarian carcinomas. Receptors were detected in a high proportion of the specimens from epithelial carcinomas (92%) and stromal tumors (100%) of the ovary. But, Gn-RH receptor was not detected in germ-cell derived tumors of the ovary. Established endometrial carcinoma (CUME-1) and epithelial ovarian carcinoma (CUMO-2) cell lines also demonstrated Gn-RH receptor mRNA, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The expression of Gn-RH receptor raises the possibility that Gn-RH may play a direct regulatory role in the growth of hormone-dependent normal tissues and their respective tumors, and provides a possible point of attack for therapeutic approaches using Gn-RH analogs in endometrial and ovarian malignancies.
  • 2,624 View
  • 12 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP