Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Epidermal growth factor receptors"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Gastrointestinal cancer
Clinical Characteristics of and Treatment Pattern for EGFR-Amplified Colorectal Cancer
Seong-Eun Kim, Hyehyun Jeong, Sun Young Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Deokhoon Kim, Jihun Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Tae Won Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(4):1104-1114.   Published online January 10, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.569
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification status.
Materials and Methods
Patients with mCRC who underwent next-generation sequencing using a targeted 244-gene panel from 2016 to 2021 were identified and screened for EGFR copy numbers. Cases with at least five copies were reviewed for tumor purity adjustment, and those with an adjusted copy number of ≥ 6 were defined as EGFR-amplified (EGFR amp+). Their clinical characteristics were compared with those without EGFR amplification (EGFR amp–).
Results
Among 2,421 patients, 35 (1.4%) were EGFR amp+. Clinical characteristics did not significantly differ according to EGFR amplification status, but EGFR amp+ cases had fewer instances of peritoneal seeding (8.6% vs. 21.8%). Overall survival (OS) tended to be better in EGFR amp+ patients compared with EGFR amp– patients (median OS [mOS], 76 vs. 37 months; p=0.145). Among 572 patients who received anti-EGFR antibody–based chemotherapy (anti-EGFR CTx) during disease course, mOS tended to be better in 16 EGFR amp+ patients (79 months) compared with 556 EGFR amp– patients (39 months, p=0.048). Seven out of 35 EGFR amp+ patients were treated with front-line anti-EGFR CTx, and their progression-free survival did not differ from that of EGFR amp– patients treated with front-line anti-EGFR CTx (20 vs. 14 months, p=0.344).
Conclusion
This study may suggest a favorable predictive impact of EGFR amplification in patients treated with anti-EGFR CTx. However, the benefit of front-line anti-EGFR antibody treatment in this group was not notable.
  • 4,078 View
  • 119 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP