Danbee Kang, Ka Ryeong Bae, Yeojin Ahn, Nayeon Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Se Kyung Lee, Young Mog Shim, Dong Hyun Sinn, Seung Yeop Oh, Mison Chun, Jaesung Heo, Juhee Cho
Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(2):419-428. Published online November 8, 2022
Purpose We developed a comprehensive return to work (RTW) intervention covering physical, psycho-social and practical issues for patients newly diagnosed and evaluated its efficacy in terms of RTW.
Materials and Methods A multi-center randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention conducted at two university-based cancer centers in Korea. The intervention program comprised educational material at diagnosis, a face-to-face educational session at completion of active treatment, and three individualized telephone counseling sessions. The control group received other education at enrollment.
Results At 1-month post-intervention (T2), the intervention group was more likely to be working compared to the control group after controlling working status at diagnosis (65.4% vs. 55.9%, p=0.037). Among patients who did not work at baseline, the intervention group was 1.99-times more likely to be working at T2. The mean of knowledge score was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (7.4 vs. 6.8, p=0.029). At the 1-year follow-up, the intervention group was 65% (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 3.48) more likely to have higher odds for having work.
Conclusion The intervention improved work-related knowledge and was effective in facilitating cancer patients’ RTW.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Supporting Life Adjustment in Patients With Lung Cancer Through a Comprehensive Care Program: Protocol for a Controlled Before-and-After Trial Wonyoung Jung, Alice Ahn, Genehee Lee, Sunga Kong, Danbee Kang, Dongok Lee, Tae Eun Kim, Young Mog Shim, Hong Kwan Kim, Jongho Cho, Juhee Cho, Dong Wook Shin JMIR Research Protocols.2024; 13: e54707. CrossRef
A visualized and bibliometric analysis of cancer vocational rehabilitation research using CiteSpace Zebing Luo, Xuejia Liu, Chujun Chen Work.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Psychosocial Adjustment Experiences Among Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Survivors Jie Jiang, Ming-Hui Yan, Yu-Ying Fan, Jun-E Zhang Cancer Nursing.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Ki-Tae Hwang, Woochul Noh, Se-Heon Cho, Jonghan Yu, Min Ho Park, Joon Jeong, Hyouk Jin Lee, Jongjin Kim, Sohee Oh, Young A Kim, Korean Breast Cancer Society
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):1114-1126. Published online February 2, 2017
Purpose
This study investigated the role of the education level (EL) as a prognostic factor for breast cancer and analyzed the relationship between the EL and various confounding factors.
Materials and Methods
The data for 64,129 primary breast cancer patients from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry were analyzed. The EL was classified into two groups according to the education period; the high EL group (≥ 12 years) and low EL group (< 12 years). Survival analyses were performed with respect to the overall survival between the two groups.
Results
A high EL conferred a superior prognosis compared to a low EL in the subgroup aged > 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.626; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.577 to 0.678) but not in the subgroup aged ≤ 50 years (hazard ratio, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.865 to 1.024). The EL was a significant independent factor in the subgroup aged > 50 years according to multivariate analyses. The high EL group showed more favorable clinicopathologic features and a higher proportion of patients in this group received lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and endocrine therapy. In the high EL group, a higher proportion of patients received chemotherapy in the subgroups with unfavorable clinicopathologic features. The EL was a significant prognosticator across all molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Conclusion
The EL is a strong independent prognostic factor for breast cancer in the subgroup aged > 50 years regardless of the molecular subtype, but not in the subgroup aged ≤ 50 years. Favorable clinicopathologic features and active treatments can explain the main causality of the superior prognosis in the high EL group.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk factors for intensive care unit readmission after lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study Hye-Bin Kim, Sungwon Na, Hyo Chae Paik, Hyeji Joo, Jeongmin Kim Acute and Critical Care.2021; 36(2): 99. CrossRef
Educational disparities in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival: Temporal trends and mediating effects of clinical factors Wang‐Zhong Li, Guo‐Ying Liu, Shu‐Hui Lv, Sen‐Kui Xu, Hu Liang, Kui‐Yuan Liu, Meng‐Yun Qiang, Xi Chen, Xiang Guo, Xing Lv, Wei‐Xiong Xia, Yan‐Qun Xiang Clinical and Translational Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Education level as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma Limei Xu, Xiuju Wang, Xueyi Pan, Xiaotao Wang, Qing Wang, Bingyi Wu, Jiahui Cai, Ying Zhao, Lijuan Chen, Wuping Li, Juan Li BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic influence of Korean public medical insurance system on breast cancer patients Ki-Tae Hwang, Young Wook Ju, Young A Kim, Jongjin Kim, Sohee Oh, Jiwoong Jung, Young Jun Chai, In Sil Choi, So Won Oh Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2019; 96(2): 58. CrossRef