Purpose
The phase 3 randomized SQUIRE study revealed significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (neci+GC) than for gemcitabine and cisplatin alone (GC) in 1,093 patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This post hoc subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of neci+GC among East Asian (EA) patients enrolled in the study.
Materials and Methods
All patients received up to six 3-week cycles of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8, 1,250 mg/m²) and cisplatin (day 1, 75 mg/m²). Patients in the neci+GC arm also received necitumumab (days 1 and 8, 800 mg) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from stratified Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
In EA patients, there were improvements for neci+GC (n=43) versus GC (n=41) in OS (HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.484 to 1.341) and PFS (HR, 0.720; 95% CI, 0.439 to 1.180), consistent with the results for non-EA patients observed in the present study. The overall safety data were consistent between EA and non-EA patients. A numerically higher proportion of patients experienced serious adverse events (AEs), grade ≥ 3 AEs, and AEs with an outcome of death for neci+GC versus GC in EA patients and EA patients versus non-EA patients for neci+GC.
Conclusion
Although limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature of the analysis, these findings are consistent with those of the overall study and suggest that neci+GC offers a survival advantage and favorable benefit/risk for EA patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Phytochemicals intended for anticancer effects at preclinical levels to clinical practice: Assessment of formulations at nanoscale for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy The Hong Phong Nguyen, V. Bharath Kumar, Vinoth Kumar Ponnusamy, Thi Thu Thao Mai, Phuong Tran Nhat, Kathirvel Brindhadevi, Arivalagan Pugazhendhi Process Biochemistry.2021; 104: 55. CrossRef
Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis Irena Ilic, Sandra Sipetic, Jovan Grujicic, Milena Ilic Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2020; 26(6): 1331. CrossRef
Recent progress in systemic treatment for lung cancer Jeffrey W. Clark, Dan L. Longo Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine.2018; 24(4): 355. CrossRef
Necitumumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical controversies Vincenzo di Noia, Ettore D’Argento, Sara Pilotto, Giulia Grizzi, Mario Caccese, Roberto Iacovelli, Giampaolo Tortora, Emilio Bria Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy.2018; 18(9): 937. CrossRef
SELECT-3: a phase I study of selumetinib in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in the first-line setting Alastair Greystoke, Nicola Steele, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Fiona Blackhall, Noor Md Haris, Colin R Lindsay, Raffaele Califano, Mark Voskoboynik, Yvonne Summers, Karen So, Dana Ghiorghiu, Angela W Dymond, Stuart Hossack, Ruth Plummer, Emma Dean British Journal of Cancer.2017; 117(7): 938. CrossRef
Purpose
This subgroup analysis of a phase II trial was conducted to assess possible ethnicity-based trends in efficacy and safety in East Asian (EA) and non-EA populations with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
Never-smoker patients (n=240) with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC included 133 EA patients randomized to pemetrexed supplemented with dexamethasone, folic acid, and vitamin B12 plus erlotinib (pemetrexed-erlotinib) (n=41), erlotinib (n=49), or pemetrexed (n=43), and 107 non-EA patients randomized to pemetrexed-erlotinib (n=37), erlotinib (n=33), or pemetrexed (n=37). The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was analyzed using a multivariate Cox model.
Results
Consistent with the results of the overall study, a statistically significant difference in PFS among the three arms was noted in the EA population favoring pemetrexed-erlotinib (overall p=0.003) as compared with either single-agent arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.79; p=0.004 vs. erlotinib; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.70; p=0.001 vs. pemetrexed). The EA patients treated with pemetrexed-erlotinib achieved a longer median PFS (7.4 months) compared with erlotinib (4.5 months) and pemetrexed (4.0 months). The PFS results also numerically favored pemetrexed-erlotinib in the non-EA population (overall p=0.210) (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.05; p=0.078 vs. erlotinib; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.32; p=0.320 vs. pemetrexed) (median PFS: pemetrexed-erlotinib, 6.7 months; erlotinib, 3.0 months; pemetrexed, 4.4 months).
Conclusion
The PFS results from this subset analysis in both EA and non-EA populations are consistent with the results in the overall population. The PFS advantage for pemetrexed-erlotinib is significant compared with the single agents in EA patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Association of Hypokalemia Incidence and Better Treatment Response in NSCLC Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on Anti-EGFR Targeted Therapy Clinical Trials Jiawei Zhou, Jianling Bai, Yuanping Yue, Xin Chen, Theis Lange, Dongfang You, Yang Zhao Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Non-Smoking-Associated Lung Cancer: A distinct Entity in Terms of Tumor Biology, Patient Characteristics and Impact of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Elisabeth Smolle, Martin Pichler Cancers.2019; 11(2): 204. CrossRef
Pemetrexed versus Gefitinib as Second-line Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials Huiyu Wang, Zunjing Zhang, Feng Liu, Miaoying Zhou, Handi Lv Pteridines.2019; 30(1): 171. CrossRef
A Review of Regimens Combining Pemetrexed With an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in the Treatment of Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer James Chih-Hsin Yang, Tony Mok, Baohui Han, Mauro Orlando, Tarun Puri, Keunchil Park Clinical Lung Cancer.2018; 19(1): 27. CrossRef
Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Pharmacodynamic Separation of Pemetrexed and Intercalated Erlotinib Versus Pemetrexed Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous, Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Tianhong Li, Bilal Piperdi, William V. Walsh, Mimi Kim, Laurel A. Beckett, Rasim Gucalp, Missak Haigentz, Venu G. Bathini, Huiyu Wen, Kaili Zhou, Patricia B. Pasquinelli, Srikanth Gajavelli, Meera Sreedhara, Xianhong Xie, Primo N. Lara, David R. Gandara, Clinical Lung Cancer.2017; 18(1): 60. CrossRef
Erlotinib intercalating pemetrexed/cisplatin versus erlotinib alone in Chinese patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective, non-randomised, concurrent controlled trial (NCT01578668) Haihong Yang, Qiuhua Deng, Yuan Qiu, Jun Huang, Yubao Guan, Fengnan Wang, Xin Xu, Xinyun Yang ESMO Open.2017; 2: e000112. CrossRef
Gene mutation discovery research of non-smoking lung cancer patients due to indoor radon exposure Jung Ran Choi, Seong Yong Park, O Kyu Noh, Young Wha Koh, Dae Ryong Kang Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lessons Learned Dae Ho Lee, Vichien Srimuninnimit, Rebecca Cheng, Xin Wang, Mauro Orlando Cancer Research and Treatment.2015; 47(4): 549. CrossRef