Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
11 "Advanced gastric cancer"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Treatment Patterns and Changes in Quality of Life during First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Jin Won Kim, Jong Gwang Kim, Byung Woog Kang, Ik-Joo Chung, Young Seon Hong, Tae-You Kim, Hong Suk Song, Kyung Hee Lee, Dae Young Zang, Yoon Ho Ko, Eun-Kee Song, Jin Ho Baek, Dong‐Hoe Koo, So Yeon Oh, Hana Cho, Keun-Wook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):223-239.   Published online October 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.073
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate chemotherapy patterns and changes in quality of life (QOL) during first-line palliative chemotherapy for Korean patients with unresectable or metastatic/recurrent gastric cancer (GC).
Materials and Methods
Thiswas a non-interventional, multi-center, prospective, observational study of 527 patients in Korea. QOL assessments were conducted using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaires (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-STO22 every 3 months over a 12-month period during first-line palliative chemotherapy. The specific chemotherapy regimens were selected by individual clinicians.
Results
Most patients (93.2%) received combination chemotherapy (mainly fluoropyrimidine plus platinum) as their first-line palliative chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.2 and 14.8 months, respectively. Overall, “a little” changes (differences of 5-10 points from baseline)were observed in some of the functioning or symptom scales; none of the QOL scales showed either “moderate” or “very much” change (i.e., ≥ 11 point difference from baseline). When examining the best change in each QOL domain from baseline, scales related to some aspects of functioning, global health status/QOL, and most symptoms revealed significant improvements (p < 0.05). Throughout the course of first-line palliative chemotherapy, most patients’ QOL was maintained to a similar degree, regardless of their actual response to chemotherapy.
Conclusion
This observational study provides important information on the chemotherapy patterns and QOL changes in Korean patientswith advanced GC. Overall, first-line palliative chemotherapy was found to maintain QOL, and most parameters showed an improvement compared with the baseline at some point during the course.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Health-related quality of life with bemarituzumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with FGFR2b-overexpressing, advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer
    Z.A. Wainberg, P.C. Enzinger, S. Qin, K. Yamaguchi, J. Wang, X. Zhou, A. Gnanasakthy, K. Taylor, A. Yusuf, I. Majer, A. Jamotte, Y.-K. Kang
    ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 6: 100095.     CrossRef
  • Impact of systemic cancer treatment on quality of life and mental well-being: a comparative analysis of patients with localized and advanced cancer
    Adán Rodríguez-Gonzalez, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas, Raquel Hernandez San Gil, Patricia Cruz-Castellanos, Mónica Antoñanzas-Basa, David Lorente-Estelles, María Jose Corral, Manuel González-Moya, Oscar Alfredo Castillo-Trujillo, Emilio Esteban, Paula Jiménez-
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2023; 25(12): 3492.     CrossRef
  • Reminiscence therapy-based care program alleviates anxiety and depression, as well as improves the quality of life in recurrent gastric cancer patients
    Xing Wu, Weiwei Zhang
    Frontiers in Psychology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Toxicities and Quality of Life during Cancer Treatment in Advanced Solid Tumors
    Eun Mi Lee, Paula Jiménez-Fonseca, Rocio Galán-Moral, Sara Coca-Membribes, Ana Fernández-Montes, Elena Sorribes, Esmeralda García-Torralba, Laura Puntí-Brun, Mireia Gil-Raga, Juana Cano-Cano, Caterina Calderon
    Current Oncology.2023; 30(10): 9205.     CrossRef
  • Psychosocial functioning in individuals with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a mixed methods systematic review
    Cara Ghiglieri, Martin Dempster, Sam Wright, Lisa Graham-Wisener
    BMC Palliative Care.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial)
    Keun-Wook Lee, Ik-Joo Chung, Min-Hee Ryu, Young Iee Park, Byung-Ho Nam, Ho-Suk Oh, Kyung Hee Lee, Hye Sook Han, Bong-Gun Seo, Jae-Cheol Jo, Hyo Rak Lee, Jin Won Kim, Sook Ryun Park, Sang Hee Cho, Yoon-Koo Kang
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(1): 156.     CrossRef
  • Effect of early tumor response on the health-related quality of life among patients on second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the ABSOLUTE trial
    Kazumasa Fujitani, Kohei Shitara, Atsuo Takashima, Keisuke Koeda, Hiroki Hara, Norisuke Nakayama, Shuichi Hironaka, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Yutaka Kimura, Kenji Amagai, Hisashi Hosaka, Yoshito Komatsu, Ken Shimada, Ryohei Kawabata, Hideki Ohdan, Yasuhiro Kode
    Gastric Cancer.2021; 24(2): 467.     CrossRef
  • Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy: Call for Action
    Maheswari Senthil
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Impact of gastric cancer treatment on quality of life of patients
    Kerstin Schütte, Christian Schulz, Kristina Middelberg-Bisping
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2021; 50-51: 101727.     CrossRef
  • Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer—A Systematic Review
    Sophia Kristina Rupp, Andreas Stengel
    Frontiers in Psychiatry.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Chronological changes in quality of life and body composition after gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer
    Ki Bum Park, Ji Yeon Park, Seung Soo Lee, Ho Young Chung, Oh Kyoung Kwon
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(5): 262.     CrossRef
  • Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome
    Hannah Christina Puhr, Eleonore Pablik, Anna Sophie Berghoff, Gerd Jomrich, Sebastian Friedrich Schoppmann, Matthias Preusser, Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
    ESMO Open.2020; 5(2): e000623.     CrossRef
  • 11,581 View
  • 237 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Wernicke's Encephalopathy in Advanced Gastric Cancer
Eun Suk Jung, Obin Kwon, Soo Hyun Lee, Ki Byung Lee, Joo Hoon Kim, Sang Hyun Yoon, Gun Min Kim, Hei-Cheul Jeung, Sun Young Rha
Cancer Res Treat. 2010;42(2):77-81.   Published online June 30, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2010.42.2.77
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

With their prolonged survival and malnutrition, cancer patients, and especially gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancer patients, can develop Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE). The aim of this study is to remind physicians of the importance of WE and prompt management in patients with GI tract cancer.

Materials and Methods

This study is a retrospective review of 2 cases of WE in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients, and we review the literature for cases of GI tract cancer related to WE.

Results

A 48-year-old female with AGC presented dizziness and diplopia for 5 days and a 20 kg weight loss. Neurologic exam showed nystagmus and gaze disturbance. Her symptoms improved after daily parenteral injection of thiamine 100 mg for 17 days. A 58-year-old female with AGC presented with sudden disorientation, confusion and 15 kg weight loss. Neurologic exam showed gaze limitation and mild ataxia. Despite daily parenteral injection of thiamine 100 mg for 4 days, she died 5 days after the onset of neurologic symptoms. Combining the cases noted in the literature review with our 2 cases, the 7 gastric cancer cases and 2 colorectal cancer cases related to WE showed similar clinical characteristics; 1) a history of long-period malnutrition and weight loss, 2) relatively typical neurologic signs and symptoms and 3) specific magnetic resonance image findings. Except for 2 patients who had irreversible neurologic symptoms, the other 7 patients were improved with prompt thiamine treatment.

Conclusion

It is important to consider WE in GI tract cancer patients with acute neurologic symptoms and who are in a state of malnutrition. Thiamine should be given as soon as possible when WE is suspected.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Duodenal Adenocarcinoma in the Setting of Bariatric Surgery: A Perfect Storm for Wernicke’s Encephalopathy
    Aliza Gross, Allen T Yu, Jacques Lara-Reyna, Koji Park, Eugenius J Harvey
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Thiamine deficiency in pregnancy and lactation: implications and present perspectives
    Ozaifa Kareem, Sobia Nisar, Masood Tanvir, Umar Muzaffer, G. N. Bader
    Frontiers in Nutrition.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beware of lethal Wernicke's encephalopathy after cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC for peritoneal pseudomyxoma: Case report of morbidity and mortality review
    Oumayma Lahnaoui, Nezha EL Bahaoui, Sara El Atiq, Laila Amrani, Mohammed Anass Majbar, Amine Benkabbou, Raouf Mohsine, Amine Souadka
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 98: 107500.     CrossRef
  • Thiamine deficiency unrelated to alcohol consumption in high‐income countries: a literature review
    Filomena Gomes, Gilles Bergeron, Megan W. Bourassa, Philip R. Fischer
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2021; 1498(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • WERNICKE ENCEPHALOPATHY IN A PATIENT WITH GASTRIC CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY: A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Zining Liu, Xin Ye, Jiejin Yang, Zeyang Chen
    Gastroenterology Nursing.2020; 43(6): 463.     CrossRef
  • Wernicke's encephalopathy in a subject with enter-colic fistula
    Daniele Canova, Paola Scalon, Fabio Monica, Stefano A. Grassi, Anna Giacomin, Tiziana Tumelero, Gaetano Mastropaolo, Francesco Malfa
    Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Wernicke's encephalopathy in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma post-Autologous HSCT
    João Paulo de Vasconcelos Leitão, Romélia Pinheiro Gonçalves Lemes, Maritza Cavalcante Barbosa, Beatriz Stela Gomes de Souza Pitombeira Araújo, Karine Sampaio Nunes Barroso, Jacques Kaufman, Talyta Ellen de Jesus dos Santos, Anna Thawanny Gadelha Moura, A
    Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira.2018; 64(10): 882.     CrossRef
  • Wernicke encephalopathy as initial presentation of lymphoma
    Ju Hyun Seo, Ju Hee Kim, Der Sheng Sun, Hye Sung Won, Jeong Wook Park, Yoon Ho Ko
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2017; 32(6): 1112.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Thiamine and Effects of Deficiency in Dogs and Cats
    Georgia Kritikos, Jacqueline Parr, Adronie Verbrugghe
    Veterinary Sciences.2017; 4(4): 59.     CrossRef
  • Association between malignancy and non-alcoholic Wernicke's encephalopathy: a case report and literature review
    Evan Y. Choi, William A. Gomes, Missak Haigentz, Jerome J. Graber
    Neuro-Oncology Practice.2016; 3(3): 196.     CrossRef
  • Wernicke encephalopathy as rare complication of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
    Antonio Macrì, Francesco Fleres, Antonio Ieni, Maurizio Rossitto, Tommaso Mandolfino, Salvatore Micalizzi, Francesco Iaropoli, Carmelo Mazzeo, Massimo Trovato, Eugenio Cucinotta, Edoardo Saladino
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2015; 16: 29.     CrossRef
  • Two Cases of Wernicke's Encephalopathy That Developed during Total Parenteral Nutrition in Colon Cancer Patients Treated with 5-Fluorouracil-based Chemotherapy
    Kyung Pyo Cho, Jae Sung Lee, Ji Seok Seong, Yong Moon Woo, Young Jun Cho, Beom Jin Jeong, Jee Hoon Sohn, Su-Jung Kim
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 64(3): 158.     CrossRef
  • Wernicke's encephalopathy in a patient with gastric carcinoma: a diagnosis not to miss
    Chandrashekar Udyavara Kudru, Shivashankara Kaniyoor Nagiri, Sandeep Rao
    BMJ Case Reports.2014; : bcr2013203511.     CrossRef
  • Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome in Primary Peritoneal Cancer
    Ki Hyang Kim
    Case Reports in Oncology.2013; 6(3): 593.     CrossRef
  • 12,247 View
  • 86 Download
  • 14 Crossref
Close layer
Prognosis of pN3 Stage Gastric Cancer
Jung Ryun Ahn, Minkyu Jung, Chan Kim, Min Hee Hong, Hong Jae Chon, Hye Ryun Kim, Hei-Cheul Jeung, Woo Jin Hyung, Sung Sook Lee, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sung Hoon Noh, Sun Young Rha
Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41(2):73-79.   Published online June 30, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2009.41.2.73
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the prognosis of pN3 stage gastric cancer patients after they have undergone curative resection, and we also wanted to identify the prognostic factors according to the clinico-pathologic features.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2000 and December 2004, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients with histologically confirmed pN3 stage gastric cancer. They underwent both gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy with a curative aim. We categorized the pN3 stage patients into 2 groups; one with pN3 only (pN3M0) and the other with pN3 combined with M1 stage (pN3M1) that included peritoneal seeding, hepatic metastasis or para-aortic LN metastasis.

Results

Out of 467 patients with stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma who received surgery, 260 patients underwent curative resection and they were pathologically staged as N3. Among these 260 patients, 78 patients were classified as the pN3/M1 stage. For all the patients, the median follow-up period was 19 months (range: 1~108 months) and the median overall survival time was 16.2 months (95% CI, 14.1~18.3%). The 5-year survival rate of the pN3/M0 group was significantly higher than that of the pN3/M1 group (12.6% vs. 2.6%, respectively, p<0.0001). The identified predictor for a worse prognosis was an advanced T4 stage (HR: 3.38, 95% CI, 1.4~8.3, p=0.008) for the pN3 patients.

Conclusion

The survival for the pN3 gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy was significantly longer in the pN3/M0 group as compared to that of the pN3/M1 group. An advanced T stage was a predictor for a poor prognosis for the pN3 patients. Therefore, diverse treatment strategies for these heterogeneous pN3 gastric cancer patients are needed for improving their survival.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • GSK461364A suppresses proliferation of gastric cancer cells and induces apoptosis
    Dilara Ataseven, Şeyma Taştemur, Fatih Yulak, Sebahattin Karabulut, Mustafa Ergul
    Toxicology in Vitro.2023; 90: 105610.     CrossRef
  • HDAC4 promotes the growth and metastasis of gastric cancer via autophagic degradation of MEKK3
    Wei-Jie Zang, Yi-Lin Hu, Chen-Yu Qian, Ying Feng, Jia-Zhou Liu, Jun-Ling Yang, Hua Huang, Yi-Zhun Zhu, Wan-Jiang Xue
    British Journal of Cancer.2022; 127(2): 237.     CrossRef
  • Tumor purity as a prognosis and immunotherapy relevant feature in gastric cancer
    Zhe Gong, Jieyun Zhang, Weijian Guo
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(23): 9052.     CrossRef
  • S100A10 Accelerates Aerobic Glycolysis and Malignant Growth by Activating mTOR-Signaling Pathway in Gastric Cancer
    Yan Li, Xiao-Yu Li, Li-Xiang Li, Ru-Chen Zhou, Yinhe Sikong, Xiang Gu, Bi-Ying Jin, Bing Li, Yan-Qing Li, Xiu-Li Zuo
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncología personalizada: principales biomarcadores en el pronóstico y tratamiento de tumores sólidos
    Marta Molina Romero, Emilio José Laserna Mendieta, Gema María Varo Sánchez, María Concepción Alonso-Cerezo, María Orera Clemente
    Revista del Laboratorio Clínico.2019; 12(3): e1.     CrossRef
  • Is it worthy of adding dissection of the superior mesenteric vein lymph node (14v) to standard D2 gastrectomy for distal gastric cancers with No. 6 lymph node metastasis?
    J. Zhang, S. Zou, R. Luo, Z. Zhu, Z. Wang, H. Xu, B. Huang
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2019; 21(12): 1699.     CrossRef
  • Reduced expression of Rap1GAP as a prognostic biomarker for primary gastric cancer patients
    Jingjing Zhao, Cong Mai, Desheng Weng, Changlong Chen, Ziqi Zhou, Yuan Liu, Zhiwei Zhou, Peng Wang
    Cancer Biomarkers.2018; 22(3): 375.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Discrepancy of the 6th and 7th UICC N Classification for Lymph Node Staging in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Resection
    Sung Jin Oh, Byoung Jo Suh, Jong Kwon Park, Sung Don Oh, Hang Jong Yu
    Case Reports in Oncology.2017; 10(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • Gastric biomarkers: a global review
    Nick Baniak, Jenna-Lynn Senger, Shahid Ahmed, S. C. Kanthan, Rani Kanthan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MiR 21‐5p as a predictor of recurrence in young gastric cancer patients
    Soo‐Kyung Park, Young Soo Park, Ji Yong Ahn, Eun‐Ju Do, Dongho Kim, Jee Eun Kim, kyoungwon Jung, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Byong Duk Ye, Dong Hoon Yang, Sang Hyoung Park, Sung Wook Hwang, Hwoon‐Yong Jung, Seung‐Jae Myung
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(8): 1429.     CrossRef
  • Functional polymorphisms in apoptosis pathway genes and survival in patients with gastric cancer
    Dongying Gu, Mulong Du, Cuiju Tang, Haiyan Chu, Zhi Xu, Xinyin Huo, Weida Gong, Yongfei Tang, Jianwei Zhou, Na Tong, Yong Xu, Zhengdong Zhang, Meilin Wang, Jinfei Chen
    Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis.2014; 55(5): 421.     CrossRef
  • Improved survival after adding dissection of the superior mesenteric vein lymph node (14v) to standard D2 gastrectomy for advanced distal gastric cancer
    Bang Wool Eom, Jungnam Joo, Young-Woo Kim, Daniel Reim, Ji Yeon Park, Hong Man Yoon, Keun Won Ryu, Jong Yeul Lee, Myeong-Cherl Kook
    Surgery.2014; 155(3): 408.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive genomic meta-analysis identifies intra-tumoural stroma as a predictor of survival in patients with gastric cancer
    Yonghui Wu, Heike Grabsch, Tatiana Ivanova, Iain Beehuat Tan, Jacinta Murray, Chia Huey Ooi, Alexander Ian Wright, Nicholas P West, Gordon G A Hutchins, Jeanie Wu, Minghui Lee, Julian Lee, Jun Hao Koo, Khay Guan Yeoh, Nicole van Grieken, Bauke Ylstra, Sun
    Gut.2013; 62(8): 1100.     CrossRef
  • Validity and Necessity of Sub-classification of N3 in the 7thUICC TNM Stage of Gastric Cancer
    Fang-Xuan Li, Ru-Peng Zhang, Han Liang, Ji-Chuan Quan, Hui Liu, Hui Zhang
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 14(3): 2091.     CrossRef
  • Is the New Seventh AJCC/UICC Staging System Appropriate for Patients with Gastric Cancer?
    Hong Man Yoon, Keun Won Ryu, Byung Ho Nam, Soo Jeong Cho, Sook Ryun Park, Jong Yeul Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Il Ju Choi, Young-Woo Kim
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2012; 214(1): 88.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer: Results of a Chinese Single-Institution Study of 1,503 Patients
    Wei Wang, Xiao-wei Sun, Chao-feng Li, Lin Lv, Yuan-fang Li, Ying-bo Chen, Da-zhi Xu, Rajiv Kesari, Chun-yu Huang, Wei Li, You-qing Zhan, Zhi-wei Zhou
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2011; 18(4): 1060.     CrossRef
  • 12,066 View
  • 76 Download
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Heptaplatin 1-hour Infusion and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy Comparing with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Kyung Hee Lee, Myung Soo Hyun, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Hyung Min Jin, Jinmo Yang, Hong Suk Song, Young Rok Do, Hun Mo Ryoo, Joo Seop Chung, Dae Young Zang, Ho-Yeong Lim, Jong Youl Jin, Chang Yeol Yim, Hee Sook Park, Jun Suk Kim, Chang Hak Sohn, Soon Nam Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41(1):12-18.   Published online March 31, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2009.41.1.12
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

Heptaplatin (Sunpla) is a cisplatin derivative. A phase IIb trial using heptaplatin resulted in a 34% response rate with mild nephrotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase III trial of heptaplatin plus 5-FU compared with cisplatin plus 5-FU in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

One hundred seventy-four patients (heptaplatin, n=88; cisplatin, n=86) from 13 centers were enrolled. The eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with pathologically-proven adenocarcinoma, chemonaive patients, or patients who had received only single adjuvant chemotherapy, and who had a measurable or evaluable lesion. On day 1, heptaplatin (400 mg/m2) or cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given over 1 hour with 5-FU (1 gm/m2) on days 1~5 every 4 weeks.

Results

At the time of survival analysis, the median overall survival was 7.3 months in the 5-FU + heptaplatin (FH) arm and 7.9 months in the 5-FU + cisplatin (FP) arm (p=0.24). Of the FH patients, 34.2% (complete response [CR], 1.3%; partial response [PR], 32.9%) experienced a confirmed objective response compared with 35.9% (CR 0%, PR 35.9%) of FP patients (p=0.78). The median-time-to-progression was 2.5 months in the FH arm and 2.3 months in the FP arm. The incidence of neutropenia was higher with FP (28%) than with FH (16%; p=0.06); grade 3~4 nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the FP than in the FH arm (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). The incidence of increased proteinuria and creatininemia was higher with FH than with FP; however, there was no statistical difference. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Heptaplatin showed similar effects to cisplatin when combined with 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer patients with tolerable toxicities.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Survival and Financial Benefit of Investigator-Initiated Trials Conducted by Korean Cancer Study Group
    Bum Jun Kim, Chi Hoon Maeng, Bhumsuk Keam, Young-Hyuck Im, Jungsil Ro, Kyung Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Tae Won Kim, Jae Lyun Lee, Dae Seog Heo, Sang-We Kim, Keunchil Park, Myung-Ju Ahn, Byoung Chul Cho, Hoon-Kyo Kim, Yoon-Koo Kang, Jae Yong Cho, Hwan Jung Yu
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Quantum mechanical approaches and molecular docking analysis of platinum metal-based anticancer drugs Lobaplatin and Heptaplatin targeting cancer DNA - a comparative analysis
    Madhavi Sahadevan, Mullainathan Sundaram, Karunagaran Subramanian
    Chemical Physics Letters.2024; 842: 141191.     CrossRef
  • Cisplatin Resistance in Cancer Therapy: Causes and Overcoming Strategies
    S. Shruthi, K. Bhasker Shenoy
    ChemistrySelect.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances on Pt-Based Compounds for Theranostic Applications
    Giulia Ferrari, Ines Lopez-Martinez, Thomas Wanek, Claudia Kuntner, Diego Montagner
    Molecules.2024; 29(15): 3453.     CrossRef
  • Hallmarks of anticancer and antimicrobial activities of corroles
    Vinay K. Sharma, Yehuda G. Assaraf, Zeev Gross
    Drug Resistance Updates.2023; : 100931.     CrossRef
  • Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases
    Dobrina Tsvetkova, Stefka Ivanova
    Molecules.2022; 27(8): 2466.     CrossRef
  • Second and third-row transition metal compounds containing benzimidazole ligands: An overview of their anticancer and antitumour activity
    Galdina V. Suárez-Moreno, Delia Hernández-Romero, Óscar García-Barradas, Óscar Vázquez-Vera, Sharon Rosete-Luna, Carlos A. Cruz-Cruz, Aracely López-Monteon, Jesús Carrillo-Ahumada, David Morales-Morales, Raúl Colorado-Peralta
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2022; 472: 214790.     CrossRef
  • Metalofármacos en la terapia contra el cáncer
    Elizabeth Márquez López, Esmeralda Sánchez Pavón, Rodolfo Peña Rodríguez, Delia Hernández Romero, José M. Rivera Villanueva, Raúl Colorado Peralta, David Morales Morales
    TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua.2022; 16(3): e1010.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(IV) anticancer agents; are we en route to the holy grail or to a dead end?
    Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2021; 217: 111353.     CrossRef
  • Monofunctional Platinum(II) Anticancer Agents
    Suxing Jin, Yan Guo, Zijian Guo, Xiaoyong Wang
    Pharmaceuticals.2021; 14(2): 133.     CrossRef
  • Pt(IV) Prodrugs with NSAIDs as Axial Ligands
    Daniil Spector, Olga Krasnovskaya, Kirill Pavlov, Alexander Erofeev, Peter Gorelkin, Elena Beloglazkina, Alexander Majouga
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(8): 3817.     CrossRef
  • Multi-action Pt(IV) anticancer agents; do we understand how they work?
    Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2019; 191: 77.     CrossRef
  • TOXview: a novel graphical presentation of cancer treatment toxicity profiles
    Lok Lam Ngai, Emil ter Veer, Héctor G. van den Boorn, E. Hugo van Herk, Jessy Joy van Kleef, Martijn G. H. van Oijen, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
    Acta Oncologica.2019; 58(8): 1138.     CrossRef
  • Photoactivated platinum-based anticancer drugs
    Muhammad Imran, Wagma Ayub, Ian S. Butler, Zia-ur-Rehman
    Coordination Chemistry Reviews.2018; 376: 405.     CrossRef
  • Survival impact of post-progression chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sakura Iizumi, Atsuo Takashima, Kentaro Sakamaki, Satoshi Morita, Narikazu Boku
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2018; 81(6): 981.     CrossRef
  • An Analytics Approach to Designing Combination Chemotherapy Regimens for Cancer
    Dimitris Bertsimas, Allison O’Hair, Stephen Relyea, John Silberholz
    Management Science.2016; 62(5): 1511.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(iv) anticancer prodrugs – hypotheses and facts
    Dan Gibson
    Dalton Transactions.2016; 45(33): 12983.     CrossRef
  • Platinum(II) carboxylato complexes containing 7-azaindoles as N-donor carrier ligands showed cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines
    Pavel Štarha, Zdeněk Trávníček, Lucia Pazderová, Zdeněk Dvořák
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2016; 162: 109.     CrossRef
  • VEGF- and VEGFR2-Targeted Liposomes for Cisplatin Delivery to Glioma Cells
    Sergey A. Shein, Ilya I. Kuznetsov, Tatiana O. Abakumova, Pavel S. Chelushkin, Pavel A. Melnikov, Anna A. Korchagina, Dmitry A. Bychkov, Irina F. Seregina, Mikhail A. Bolshov, Alexander V. Kabanov, Vladimir P. Chekhonin, Natalia V. Nukolova
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2016; 13(11): 3712.     CrossRef
  • Condensations of single DNA molecules induced by heptaplatin and its chiral isomer
    Hong-Yan Zhang, Yu-Ru Liu, Wei Li, Hui Li, Shuo-Xing Dou, Ping Xie, Wei-Chi Wang, Peng-Ye Wang
    AIP Advances.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanocarriers for delivery of platinum anticancer drugs
    Hardeep S. Oberoi, Natalia V. Nukolova, Alexander V. Kabanov, Tatiana K. Bronich
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2013; 65(13-14): 1667.     CrossRef
  • Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials
    Kohei Shitara, Junko Ikeda, Tomoya Yokota, Daisuke Takahari, Takashi Ura, Kei Muro, Keitaro Matsuo
    Investigational New Drugs.2012; 30(3): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Cellular interactions of platinum drugs
    Ezequiel Wexselblatt, Eylon Yavin, Dan Gibson
    Inorganica Chimica Acta.2012; 393: 75.     CrossRef
  • What do we know about the reduction of Pt(IV) pro-drugs?
    Ezequiel Wexselblatt, Dan Gibson
    Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.2012; 117: 220.     CrossRef
  • Prospective, randomized trial comparing 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
    X.-L. Zhang, H.-J. Shi, S.-Z. Cui, Y.-Q. Tang, M.-C. Ba
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2011; 37(6): 466.     CrossRef
  • The status of platinum anticancer drugs in the clinic and in clinical trials
    Nial J. Wheate, Shonagh Walker, Gemma E. Craig, Rabbab Oun
    Dalton Transactions.2010; 39(35): 8113.     CrossRef
  • 12,195 View
  • 114 Download
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as Salvage Therapy for Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
Bong-Gun Seo, Sung Yong Oh, Dong Mee Lee, Hyun Seung Yoo, Suee Lee, Seong-Geun Kim, Sung-Hyun Kim, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Hyo-Jin Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2007;39(1):6-9.   Published online March 31, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2007.39.1.6
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

To evaluate the therapeutic activity and safety of paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancers that are unresponsive to primary chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients unresponsive to first line chemotherapy were entered into this trial. The treatment regimen consisted of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion on day 1, and cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 by 1 hour infusion on day 1, with the treatment repeated every 3 weeks.

Results

37 patients were entered in this study, with 32 fully evaluable for response. 4 (13%), 13 (40%) and 15 (47%) patients achieved a partial response, stable disease and progressed, respectively. The median time to progression was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.0~6.0 months), and the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI: 5.5~19.7 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 54%. Of a total of 135 cycles of chemotherapy, grades 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and anemia (3%). Grade ≥2 neuropathy was observed in 6 patients (17%).

Conclusion

The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is an effective and tolerable salvage treatment modality for advanced gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Treatment Outcome and Safety of the TCX Regimen for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Hieu Trong Nguyen, Kien Hung Do, Nguyen Ba Le, Thang Tran
    Cancer Management and Research.2022; Volume 14: 2825.     CrossRef
  • Multi-center Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Cisplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Cancer
    Q. Sun, C. Liu, H. Zhong, B. Zhong, H. Xu, W. Shen, D. Wang
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2009; 39(4): 237.     CrossRef
  • 9,286 View
  • 45 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Cispatin , Etoposide , Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil ( PELF ) Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric cancer: Interim Report
Il Rang Park, Si Young Kim, Jeong Hee Kim, Hwi Joong Yoon, Kyung Sam Cho
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(5):907-913.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
In attempt to provide a feasible chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced gastric cancer patients, the combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and fluorouracil (PELF) has been developed. A trial was performed to confirm the clinical activity, in terms of response rate and toxicity and duration of survival, of the PELF combination chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From April 1995 to July 1997, patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric cancer received PELF combination chemotherapy. The regimen consisted of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 5; epirubicin 30 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 5; 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1 through 4. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks.
RESULT
Among 21 evaluable patients, 1 patient achieved complete response (5.3%) and 8 patients, partial response (42.1%). The median survival of overall patients was 36 weeks, the median time to progression of 21 evaluable patients was 27 weeks. There was severe myelosuppression; leucopenia 73.1%, WHO grade 3~4 11.5% of cycles. Non-hematologic toxicities were also severe nausea or vomiting in 100% of patients, grade 3~4 13.0% of patients, alopecia in 91.3% of patients, grade 3~4 52.2% of patients.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that the PELF combination is effective in overall response rates. However, it is not recommended for routine clinical use because of its toxicities. Further phase III study will be warranted.
  • 3,227 View
  • 17 Download
Close layer
Selection of Surgical Procedure in the Elderly with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Hyeoung Joon Kim, Tae Kyung Sohn, Woo Joong Kim, Kyung Suk Chung
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(5):892-899.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The quality of life has become increasingly important as an outcome when assessing patients who have had surgery for advanced gastric cancer in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to study the validity of quality of postoperative life as a criterion in the decision-making process as well as the results of operation for advanced gastric cancer in the elderly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Spitzer's quality of life index, postoperative mortality and survival were evaluated in 67 patients(over 65 years of age) with advanced gastric cancer who had undergone operation between 1988 and 1997 at the Department of Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital.
RESULTS
The quality of life score and median survival correlated with TNM clinical stage(IIIa; 7.1+/-1.8, 36.0 months vs. IIIb: 5.8+/-2.8, 28.6 months vs. IV: 2.9+/-1.9, 4.5 months), resectability(reseetion: 5.9+/-2.7, 21.0 months vs. no resection: 3.0+/-2.0, 4.0 months), curability(curative operation: 6.5+/-2.4, 29.0 months vs. palliative operation: 3.3+/-2.4, 6.0 months), type of gastrectomy(subtotal gastrectomy: 6.4+/-2.7, 28.0 months vs. totai gastrectomy: 4.5+/-2.6, 9.0 months), but not with age or sex. There was a difference in operative mortality according to age group(65~70 years: 7.8% vs. >70 years: 18.8%), resectability(resection: 7.4% vs. no resection: 23.0%) and curability (curative operation: 2.3% vs. palliative operation: 25.0%).
CONCLUSION
The results suggest that surgical resection offers the only chance for improved survival and qulaity of life. Gastric resection, even with total gastrectomy, can be undertaken to reduce tumor burden, decrease threats of obstruction, hemarrhage, or perforation and improve quality of life in the elderly if there is little coexisting impairment.
  • 2,304 View
  • 13 Download
Close layer
Results of Hyperthermic Treatment Combiced with Radiotherapy/Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Inoperable Gastric Cancer
Chang Woo Moon, Ha Yong Yeom, Tae Sik Jung, Young Ho Kim, Ja Young Koo
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(4):639-651.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This retrospective study is conducted to evaluate the local response rate, survival rate, median survival times and complication of hyperthermic treatment combined with radiotherapy/chemotherapy in locally advanced inoperable gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One hundred and twenty-seven patients treated with hyperthermia from April, 1992 to December, 1994 were enrolled. Among 127 patients, 13(10.2%) were treated with thermo-radiotherapy(Group I), 4(3.1%) were treated with thermo-radio-chemotherapy(Group II) and 110(86.6%) were treated with thermo-chemotherapy (Group III). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy(135 cGy/fr., 2 times/day) using 6-MV X-ray Linac was delivered with total doses of 40.5~67.5 Gy(median: 45 Gy). Chemotherapy by FI(5-FU+ Interferon) or EAP(Etoposide+ Adriamycin+ Cisplatin) regimens was administered. Hyperthermia using 8-MHz RF(radiofrequency) capacitive heating eqiupment (CANCERMIA GHT-8) was applied with interval of 2 times/week, 40~60 minutes /session within 10~15 minutes following radiation, and was simultaneously done with chemotherapy. The estimation of local response was used computed tomography and endoscopy, and was divided into complete response(CR), partial response(PR), and no response(NR). The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
Overall local response rate(CR+ PR) was 68.5% with 6.3% in CR and 62.2% in PR. The local response rates by treatment modality were 92.3% (CR: 15.4%, PR: 76.9%) in Group I, 100%(CR: 75.0%, PR: 25.0%) in Group II and 64.5%(CR: 2.7%, PR: 61.8%) in Group III. There was statistically significant difference(p=0.0001). The overall 1 and 2 years survival rates with median survival time(MST) were 20.5%, 7.1% with 9 months, respectively. The overall 1 and 2 years survival rates(with MST) by treatment modality were 7.7%, 0%(7 months) in Group I, 50.0%, 0%(9 months) in Group II and 20.9%, 8.2%(6 months) in Group III. There was no statistically significant difference. The incidence of side effect by heating was 3.1%(4 patients) and the most serious side effect was subcutaneous fat necrosis in anterior abdominal wall.
CONCLUSION
From this study we concluded that hyperthermic treatment combined with radiotherapy/chemotherapy may increase the local response rate in locally advanced inoperable gastric cancer.
  • 2,503 View
  • 20 Download
Close layer
A Phase 2 Study on Combined 5 - Fluorouracil , Etoposide , Doxorubicin and Cisplatin ( F - EAP ) in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1994;26(1):9-16.
AbstractAbstract PDF
5-Fluorouracil(5-FU), as a single agent, has a modest but reproducible activity against gastric cancer and continuous infusion of 5-FU is associated with less myelosuppresion. It has been reported that combination of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin(EAP) was very active in advanced gastric carcinoma with an overall response rate of 64% including 21% complete response from the German investigators. A phase II study of the combination of 5-FU infusion, etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin(F-EAP), which regimen has been demonstrated to have the different mechanisms of action and synergism between each of drugs in vitro and in vivo, was performed in attempts to evaluate the antitumor activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Fifty-five previously untreated patients with surgically unreasectable or metastatic advanced gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with 5-FU(800 mg/m, days 2, 3, and 4), etoposide(70 mg/m, days 2, 3, and 4), doxorubicin(30 mg/m, day 1), and cisplatin(60 mg/m(2), day 1) repeated every 26 days. Objective responses were observed in 14 of 47(30%) evaluable patients, and the median duration of response was 21 weeks(l3~60+ ). The median survival time of 47 evaluable patients was 40 weeks(16~62). F-EAP therapy was associated with mild myelosuppression. The common non-hematologic toxieities were nausea/vomiting(94%), mucositis(32%), peripheral neuropathy (15%), and infection(11%), but the majority of these toxicities were mild to moderate and well tolerated. These results suggest that F-EAP regimen has a modest antitumor activity in terms of response rate and duration of response, and is relatively well tolerated in advanced gastric cancer.
  • 2,520 View
  • 15 Download
Close layer
A Retrospective Comparison of Infusional 5-Fluorouracil , Doxorubicin , Mitomycin - C ( Modified FAM ) Combination Chemotherapy Versus Palliative Therapy in
Joon Oh Park, Jae Kyung Roh, Hyun Cheol Chung, Hyun Jin Noh, Jae Yong Cho, Sun Young Rha, Chong In Lee, Cheol Woo Kim, Joo Hang Kim, Choong Bai Kim, Sung Hoon Noh, Kyong Sik Lee, Jin Sik Min, Byung S
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1995;27(2):165-175.
AbstractAbstract PDF
In Korea, gastric cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death. About one-third of the patients with gastric cancer is unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Their median survival is less than 6 months with very poor prognosis. Accordingly, various regimens of chemotherapy have been proposed as intensive treatment for unresectable patients. After MacDonald et aL reported 42% response rate and 9 months response duration using combination of 5-Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin and Mitomycin-CFAM), it became the most widely used regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, despite of high initial response rate, there was no survival benefit in randomised comparative trials. To increase the drug effect, we modified the standard FAM regimen by continuously infusing the 5- Fluorouracil instead of bolus injection(modified FAM). We retrospectively reviewed the clinical recoreds of 409 patients with histologically proven advanced gastric cancer in Yonsei University Medical Center and Yonsei Cencer Center between Jan. 1, 1991 and Dec. 31, 1993. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of infusional FAM combination chemotherapy compared with other palliative therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Among 409 patients, 266 were male and 143 were female with a median age of 57-year(range: 15~75). There were 202 patients in mFAM-treated group and 207 patients in control group. In mFAM-treated group, 140 patients had no surgery, 30 patients underwent a palliative bypass and 32 patients underwent a palliative resection. In control group, 151 patients had no surgery, 33 patients underwent a palliative bypass and 23 patients underwent a palliative resection. In preoperative staging, 257 patients had locally advanced disease, 48 had carcinomatosis and 104 had distant metastasis. There was no difference of distribution in age, sex, perfomance status, preoperative stege and treatment modalities between mFAM-treated and control group. 1) Among 154 of evaluable patients, no CRs were observed. PR were seen in 17.5% of patients in mFAM-treated group. The median response duration was 30 weeks and progression free survival was 23 weeks. 2) Higher 1-year survival rate was demonstrated in mFAM-treated group comparing to control group(34.1% vs 22.5)(p=0.0135). 3) Median survival was longer in mFAM-treated group than that of control group(40 week vs 28 week). 4) The toxicities were relatively tolerable and reversible. This results proposed that the infusional FAM combination chemotherapy showed a probalbility of survival pralongation, especially combined with palliative surgery in advanced gastric cancer. Further prospective randomized study will be warranted.
  • 3,258 View
  • 23 Download
Close layer
5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin ( FP ) Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer
Keum Jung Kim, Jeong Hee Kim, Si Young Kim, Hwi Joong Yoon, Kyung Sam Cho
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1995;27(3):383-389.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Thirty-one patients with advanced gastric cancer were entered into the trial between May 1988 to June l993. The patients recieved 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m by l2-hour continuous infusions for 5 consecutive days, cisplatin 100 mg/m IV on day 1 and repeated every three weeks. The results were as following: 1) Among the 31 treated patients, 27 patients had measurable disease and were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 18.5%. The median duration of response was 6 months. 2) The estimated median survival time was 7.5 months for all 31 patients. The median survival was 8.6 months in responder, and 6.4 months in non-responder. There was no significar.t difference between the two group. 3) Nausea and vomiting of WHO grades 2 and 3 were observed in 48.7%. Alopecia was observed in all patients, but most of patients were WHO grade l or 2. WHO grades 1 and 2 neurotoxicities and diarrhea occurred in 22.6%, 7.8% of patients. WHO grades 2 and 3 neutrope- nia were observed in 2.6% of patients and WHO grade 1 thrombocytopenia was observed in 9.6 of patients, but there were no toxic deaths and no bleeding complications from thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, although this PP regimen showed similar toxicity profiles than the other regimen, response rate and survival benefit were not observed.
  • 3,828 View
  • 33 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP