Purpose BRAF mutations are detected in 30%-80% of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) cases. DaBRAFenib and trametinib showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic melanoma and non–small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daBRAFenib and trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer.
Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of daBRAFenib and trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated PTC. The patients received daBRAFenib 150 mg twice daily and trametinib 2 mg once daily at the Samsung Medical Center. This study evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) overall survival (OS), and safety of daBRAFenib and trametinib.
Results Between December 2019 and January 2022, 27 PTC patients including eight patients with poorly differentiated or anaplastic transformation, received daBRAFenib and trametinib. The median age was 73.0 years, and the median follow-up period was 19.8 months. The majority (81.5%) had undergone thyroidectomy, while 8 patients had received prior systemic treatments. ORR was 73.1%, with 19 partial responses, and DCR was 92.3%. Median PFS was 21.7 months, and median OS was 21.7 months. Treatment-related adverse events included generalized weakness (29.6%), fever (25.9%), and gastrointestinal problems (22.2%). Dose reduction due to adverse events was required in 81.5% of the patients.
Conclusion DaBRAFenib and trametinib demonstrated a high ORR with promising PFS; however, most patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic PTC required a dose reduction.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines on the Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancers; Part III. Management of Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancers - Chapter 4. Systemic Therapy for Progressive Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer 2 Dong Yeob Shin, Ho-Cheol Kang, Sun Wook Kim, Dong Gyu Na, Young Joo Park, Young Shin Song, Eun Kyung Lee, Dong-Jun Lim, Yun Jae Chung, Won Gu Kim International Journal of Thyroidology.2024; 17(1): 168. CrossRef
Antineoplastic Effect of ALK Inhibitor Crizotinib in Primary Human Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Cells with STRN–ALK Fusion In Vitro Silvia Martina Ferrari, Francesca Ragusa, Giusy Elia, Valeria Mazzi, Eugenia Balestri, Chiara Botrini, Licia Rugani, Armando Patrizio, Simona Piaggi, Concettina La Motta, Salvatore Ulisse, Camilla Virili, Alessandro Antonelli, Poupak Fallahi International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(12): 6734. CrossRef
The Long Journey towards Personalized Targeted Therapy in Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (PDTC): A Case Report and Systematic Review Odysseas Violetis, Panagiota Konstantakou, Ariadni Spyroglou, Antonios Xydakis, Panagiotis B. Kekis, Sofia Tseleni, Denise Kolomodi, Manousos Konstadoulakis, George Mastorakos, Maria Theochari, Javier Aller, Krystallenia I. Alexandraki Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(6): 654. CrossRef
Treatment of Unresectable BRAF V600E, TERT-Mutated Differentiated Papillary Thyroid Cancer With Dabrafenib and Trametinib Neha Bapat, Tatiana Ferraro, Layal Esper, Arjun S Joshi, Faysal Haroun, Chelsey K Baldwin JCEM Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose Alectinib and brigatinib are second-generation anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinases (ALKs) that are widely used as first-line therapy for treating ALK-positive advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the lack of a head-to-head comparison of these drugs as first-line therapies, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of alectinib and brigatinib.
Materials and Methods Patients who received alectinib or brigatinib as the first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were evaluated for clinical outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), intracranial ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.
Results Of 208 patients who received either alectinib or brigatinib as a first-line treatment, 176 received alectinib and 32 received brigatinib. At the data cutoff point, the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 18.3) in the brigatinib group and 27.5 months (95% CI, 24.6 to 30.4) in the alectinib group. The ORR was 92.5% with alectinib and 93.8% for brigatinib. The intracranial ORR rates were 92.7% (38/41) and 100% (10/10), respectively. The rate of PFS at 12 months was comparable between the alectinib group and the brigatinib groups (84.4% vs. 84.1%, p=0.64), and the median TTNT, PFS, and OS were not reached in either group. Treatment-related adverse events were usually mild, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was rare (alectinib 4.5% vs. brigatinib 6.25%).
Conclusion Alectinib and brigatinib had similar clinical benefits when used as the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement in the real world.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Bridging the Gap between Trial Adverse Events and Real-World Data Sang Hyuk Kim, Hyun Lee, Dong Won Park Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 56(3): 972. CrossRef
Real‐world evidence of brigatinib as second‐line treatment after crizotinib for ALK+ non‐small cell lung cancer using South Korean claims data (K‐AREAL) Jeong Eun Lee, Jin Hyun Nam, Sun Hong Kwon, Bo Kyung Kim, Seung Min Ha Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Alectinib versus Platinum‐Based Chemotherapy in Resected ALK‐Positive Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer in the Chinese Health Care System Qiran Wei, Yifang Liang, Jiahui Mao, Xin Guan Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene rearrangement is a well-known driver event in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib is a selective inhibitor of RET kinase and has shown efficacy in oncogenic RET-altered tumors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of expanded access program (EAP) use of pralsetinib in pretreated, advanced NSCLC patients with RET rearrangement.
Materials and Methods Patients who received pralsetinib as part of the EAP at Samsung Medical Center were evaluated through a retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1 guidelines. Secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.
Results Between April 2020 and September 2021, 23 of 27 patients were enrolled in the EAP study. Two patients who were not analyzed due to brain metastasis and two patients whose expected survival was within 1 month were excluded from the analysis. After a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0 to 21.2), ORR was 56.5%, the median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 20.9), and the 12-month OS rate was 69.6%. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were edema (43.5%) and pneumonitis (39.1%). A total of 8.7% of patients experienced extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. TRAEs with a common grade of three or worse were neutropenia (43.5%) and anemia (34.8%). Dose reduction was required in nine patients (39.1%).
Conclusion Pralsetinib presents a clinical benefit when used in patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, consistent with a pivotal study.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Real-World Outcomes of Pralsetinib in RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC Francesca Lucibello, Valérie Gounant, Mihaela Aldea, Michaël Duruisseaux, Maurice Perol, Christos Chouaid, Jaafar Bennouna, Vincent Fallet, Aldo Renault, Florian Guisier, Etienne Giroux-Leprieur, Marie Wislez, Anne-Claire Toffart, Julien Mazieres, Clémenc JTO Clinical and Research Reports.2025; 6(1): 100743. CrossRef
Clinical evidence and adverse event management update of patients with RET- rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with pralsetinib Giuseppe Lo Russo, Paolo Bironzo, Chiara Bennati, Laura Bonanno, Annamaria Catino, Giulio Metro, Iacopo Petrini, Marco Russano, Antonio Passaro Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 194: 104243. CrossRef
RET Fusion Testing in Patients With NSCLC: The RETING Study Esther Conde, Susana Hernandez, Jose Luis Rodriguez Carrillo, Rebeca Martinez, Marta Alonso, Daniel Curto, Beatriz Jimenez, Alejandra Caminoa, Amparo Benito, Pilar Garrido, Sergi Clave, Edurne Arriola, Isabel Esteban-Rodriguez, Javier De Castro, Irene San JTO Clinical and Research Reports.2024; 5(4): 100653. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion positive non–small cell lung cancer: An observational real world study Dehua Liao, Minghui Long, Jiwen Zhang, Xingyu Wei, Fei Li, Ting Yan, Desong Yang Lung Cancer.2024; 196: 107936. CrossRef