Jin Ho Song, Hong-Gyun Wu, Bhum Suk Keam, Jeong Hun Hah, Yong Chan Ahn, Dongryul Oh, Jae Myoung Noh, Hyo Jung Park, Chang Geol Lee, Ki Chang Keum, Jihye Cha, Kwan Ho Cho, Sung Ho Moon, Ji-Yoon Kim, Woong-Ki Chung, Young Taek Oh, Won Taek Kim, Moon-June Cho, Chul Seung Kay, Yeon-Sil Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):917-927. Published online December 28, 2015
Purpose We compared the treatment results and toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) alone (the CRT arm) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT (the NCT arm). Materials and Methods A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to review NPC patterns of care and treatment outcome. Data of 568 NPC patients treated by CCRT alone or by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT were collected from 15 institutions. Patients in both treatment arms were matched using the propensity score matching method, and the clinical outcomes were analyzed.
Results After matching, 300 patients (150 patients in each group) were selected for analysis. Higher 5-year locoregional failure-free survival was observed in the CRT arm (85% vs. 72%, p=0.014). No significant differences in distant failure-free survival (DFFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival were observed between groups. In subgroup analysis, the NCT arm showed superior DFFS and DFS in stage IV patients younger than 60 years. No significant difference in compliance and toxicity was observed between groups, except the radiation therapy duration was slightly shorter in the CRT arm (50.0 days vs. 53.9 days, p=0.018). Conclusion This study did not show the superiority of NCT followed by CCRT over CCRT alone. Because NCT could increase the risk of locoregional recurrences, it can only be considered in selected young patients with advanced stage IV disease. The role of NCT remains to be defined and should not be viewed as the standard of care.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Age is a significant biomarker for the selection of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma Yihong Lin, Xiongbin Yu, Linbin Lu, Hong Chen, Junxian Wu, Yaying Chen, Qin Lin, Xuewen Wang, Xi Chen, Xiong Chen Cancer Biomarkers.2023; 37(1): 1. CrossRef
Effect of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis Shan-Shan Yang, Jian-Gui Guo, Jia-Ni Liu, Zhi-Qiao Liu, En-Ni Chen, Chun-Yan Chen, Pu-Yun OuYang, Fei Han, Fang-Yun Xie Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with additional chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of propensity score‐matching studies Minmin Li, Bin Zhang, Qiuying Chen, Lu Zhang, Xiaokai Mo, Zhuozhi Chen, Zhe Jin, Luyan Chen, Jingjing You, Shuixing Zhang Head & Neck.2021; 43(6): 1912. CrossRef
Longitudinal Assessment of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Evaluating the Radio-sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Youping Xiao, Ying Chen, Yunbin Chen, Zhuangzhen He, Yiqi Yao, Jianji Pan Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 345. CrossRef
Less is more: role of additional chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer management Yong Chan Ahn Radiation Oncology Journal.2019; 37(2): 67. CrossRef
A Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Pu-Yun OuYang, Xiao-Min Zhang, Xing-Sheng Qiu, Zhi-Qiao Liu, Lixia Lu, Yuan-Hong Gao, Fang-Yun Xie The Oncologist.2019; 24(4): 505. CrossRef
Induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Teng Hwee Tan, Yu Yang Soon, Timothy Cheo, Francis Ho, Lea Choung Wong, Jeremy Tey, Ivan W.K. Tham Radiotherapy and Oncology.2018; 129(1): 10. CrossRef
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma Jiraporn Setakornnukul, Kullathorn Thephamongkhol BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
TPF induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long term results of a Tunisian series N. Toumi, W. Ben Kridis, W. Mnejja, R. Bouzguenda, A. Khanfir, A. Ghorbel, J. Daoud, M. Frikha Cancer/Radiothérapie.2018; 22(3): 216. CrossRef
Does concurrent chemoradiotherapy preceded by chemotherapy improve survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients? Experience from Ghana Joel Yarney, Naa A. Aryeetey, Alice Mensah, Emmanuel D. Kitcher, Verna Vanderpuye, Charles Aidoo, Kenneth Baidoo Cancers of the Head & Neck.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis Mei Lan, Chunyan Chen, Ying Huang, Li Tian, Zhijun Duan, Fei Han, Junfang Liao, Meiling Deng, Terence T. Sio, Anussara Prayongrat, Lie Zheng, Shaoxiong Wu, Taixiang Lu Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
A retrospective paired study: efficacy and toxicity of nimotuzumab versus cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma H. M. Li, P. Li, Y. J. Qian, X. Wu, L. Xie, F. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Liu BMC Cancer.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
PURPOSE This study was designed to evaluate the role of oral nutritional support and nutritional counseling by dietician during radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included total 58 patients with head/neck, lung, or esophageal cancers who received radiation therapy with radical purpose between February and December, 1996. They were randomized either into nutrient supplement group (Group I) or control group (Group II). In Group I, the dietician advised patients to take high density nutrient supplement (NuCare, 250 kcal/can, Miwon co., LTD) based on dieticians initial evaluation for oral intake from initiation to completion of radiation therapy. In Group II, patients received nutritional support other than high density nutrient supplement only when patients lose weight more than 2 Kg during radiation treatment. All patients were evaluated for nutritional status and diet pattern and received nutritional counseling before radiation therapy and then weekly during treatment. RESULTS Total 45 patients (22 patients in group I, 23 patients in group II) were available. In group I, all patients received average 3 cans (2~4 cans) a day. The calory from nutrient supplement was 43.9% of their daily energy intake (25.9~68.7%). About 72.7% of patients in Group I could keep up with their oral intake over 80% of daily requirement energy comparing to only 12.3% for patients in Group II(p<0.05). The patients in Group I started to lose weight 2 weeks later and lost weight more than 3 Kg less often than patients in Group II (5/22 vs 8/23, p>0.05). CONCLUSION There was less significant weight loss in patients who started oral nutritional supplement based on the daily requirement energy early in radiation therapy. We think it is better to recommend nutritional supplement before weight loss started because radiation induced side effects such as esophagitis and oral mucositis prohibited patients to continue to take nutrient supplement.