Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
16 "Young Tae Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Gynecologic cancer
Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Lan Ying Li, Lan Ying Wen, Sun Hee Park, Eun Ji Nam, Jung Yun Lee, Sunghoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Sang Wun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(1):243-251.   Published online October 12, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.063
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The objective of this study was to define the learning curve required to attain satisfactory oncologic outcomes of cervical cancer patients who were undergoing open or minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy, and to analyze the correlation between the learning curve and tumor size.
Materials and Methods
Cervical cancer patients (stage IA-IIA) who underwent open radical hysterectomy (n=280) or minimal invasive radical hysterectomy (n=282) were retrospectively reviewed. The learning curve was evaluated using cumulative sum of 5-year recurrence rates. Survival outcomes were analyzed based on the operation period (“learning period,” P1 vs. “skilled period,” P2), operation mode, and tumor size.
Results
The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates between open and minimally invasive groups were 91.8% and 89.0% (p=0.098) and 96.1% and 97.2% (p=0.944), respectively. The number of surgeries for learning period was 30 and 60 in open and minimally invasive group, respectively. P2 had better 5-year disease-free survival than P1 after adjusting for risk factors (hazard ratio, 0.392; 95% confidence interval, 0.210 to 0.734; p=0.003). All patients with tumors < 2 cm had similar 5-year disease-free survival regardless of operation mode or learning curve. Minimally invasive group presented lower survival rates than open group when tumors ≥ 2 cm in P2. Preoperative conization improved disease-free survival in patients with tumors ≥ 2 cm, especially in minimally invasive group.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy required more cases than open group to achieve acceptable 5-year disease-free survival. When tumors ≥ 2 cm, the surgeon’s proficiency affected survival outcomes in both groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Radical Hysterectomy With Preoperative Conization in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis
    Xinbin Zhu, Lele Ye, Yunfeng Fu, Bingbing You, Weiguo Lu
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(3): 193.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review
    Atsushi Fusegi, Hiroyuki Kanao, Shiho Tsumura, Atsushi Murakami, Akiko Abe, Yoichi Aoki, Hidetaka Nomura
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of Hospital Surgical Volume With Survival in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated With Radical Hysterectomy
    Nicolò Bizzarri, Lukáš Dostálek, Luc R. C. W. van Lonkhuijzen, Diana Giannarelli, Aldo Lopez, Henrik Falconer, Denis Querleu, Ali Ayhan, Sarah H. Kim, David Isla Ortiz, Jaroslav Klat, Fabio Landoni, Juliana Rodriguez, Ranjit Manchanda, Jan Kosťun, Pedro T
    Obstetrics & Gynecology.2023; 141(1): 207.     CrossRef
  • Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?
    Graziella Moufawad, Antonio Simone Laganà, Nassir Habib, Vito Chiantera, Andrea Giannini, Federico Ferrari, Amerigo Vitagliano, Luigi Della Corte, Giuseppe Bifulco, Zaki Sleiman
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(3): 2053.     CrossRef
  • Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: The Learning Curve at a Breast Reconstruction Center and a Single-Surgeon Study
    Charalampos Varnava, Philipp Wiebringhaus, Tobias Hirsch, Alexander Dermietzel, Maximilian Kueckelhaus
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(8): 2894.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter
    Si Sun, Jing Cai, Ruixie Li, Yujia Wang, Jing Zhao, Yuhui Huang, Linjuan Xu, Qiang Yang, Zehua Wang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(3): 623.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Mengting Zhang, Wei Dai, Yuexiu Si, Yetan Shi, Xiangyuan Li, Ke Jiang, Jingyi Shen, Liying Ying
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of ESGO Quality Indicators in Cervical Cancer Surgery: A Real-World Study in a High-Volume Chinese Hospital
    Yan Ding, Xuyin Zhang, Junjun Qiu, Jianfeng Zhang, Keqin Hua
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trends in Surgical Morbidity and Survival Outcomes for Radical Hysterectomy in West China: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study
    Huining Jing, Ying Yang, Yinxia Liu, Peijun Zou, Zhengyu Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Tomohito Tanaka, Shoko Ueda, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Sousuke Hashida, Shinichi Terada, Hiromi Konishi, Yuhei Kogata, Kohei Taniguchi, Kazumasa Komura, Masahide Ohmichi
    Current Oncology.2022; 29(4): 2272.     CrossRef
  • Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma
    Yeorae Kim, Se Ik Kim, Hyojin Kim, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Kidong Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae Hong No, Yong Beom Kim, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song, Cheol Lee, Dong Hoon Suh
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 167(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
    Fuyun Zhang, Xiaomei Song
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 45(11): 465.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer
    Yinxia Liu, Shuying Huang, Xiu Ming, Huining Jing, Zhengyu Li
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2021; 28(9): 1573.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith, Tiffany Nicole Jones, Diana Miao, Amanda Nickles Fader
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2021; 28(3): 544.     CrossRef
  • The Surgeon’s Proficiency Affected Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 851 Patients
    Ying Yang, Yue Huang, Zhengyu Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-300 Inhibits the Proliferation and Metastasis of Cervical Cancer Cells via Posttranscriptional Suppression of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 34 (GPR34)
    Mei Wang, Ying Tian, Lin Miao, Wenxia Zhao, Antonio Raffone
    Journal of Oncology.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • 7,345 View
  • 143 Download
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Early Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer
Young Shin Chung, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jung-Yun Lee, Won Jun Kang, Eun Ji Nam, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):1211-1218.   Published online April 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.506
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to predict chemotherapy response before interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
Forty consecutive patients underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT at baseline and after one cycle of NAC. Metabolic responses were assessed by quantitative decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with PET/CT. Decreases in SUVmax were compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) level before IDS, response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria before IDS, residual tumor at IDS, and I chemotherapy response score (CRS) at IDS.
Results
A 40% cut-off for the decrease in SUVmax provided the best performance to predict CRS 3 (compete or near-complete pathologic response), with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 81.8%, 72.4%, and 72.4%, respectively. According to this 40% cut-off, there were 17 (42.5%) metabolic responders (≥ 40%) and 23 (57.5%) metabolic non-responders (< 40%). Metabolic responders had higher rate of CRS 3 (52.9% vs. 8.7%, p=0.003), CA-125 normalization (< 35 U/mL) before IDS (76.5% vs. 39.1%, p=0.019), and no residual tumor at IDS (70.6% vs. 31.8%, p=0.025) compared with metabolic non-responders. There were significant associations with progression-free survival (p=0.021) between metabolic responders and non-responders, but not overall survival (p=0.335).
Conclusion
Early assessment with 18F-FDG-PET/CT after one cycle of NAC can be useful to predic response to chemotherapy before IDS in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Evaluation Value of CT in the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Patients
    Daying Mou, Shengyan Xie, Pingyuan Li, Mohammad Farukh Hashmi
    Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Radiomics Analysis of PET and CT Components of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
    Xihai Wang, Zaiming Lu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,498 View
  • 135 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Genetic Profiles Associated with Chemoresistance in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Ovarian Cancer
Lan Ying Li, Hee Jung Kim, Sun Ae Park, So Hyun Lee, Lee Kyung Kim, Jung Yun Lee, Sunghoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Eun Ji Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1117-1127.   Published online November 6, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.405
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Recurrence and chemoresistance (CR) are the leading causes of death in patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) of the ovary. The aim of this study was to identify genetic changes associated with CR mechanisms using a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model and genetic sequencing.
Materials and Methods
To generate a CR HGSC PDX tumor, mice bearing subcutaneously implanted HGSC PDX tumors were treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin. We compared gene expression and mutations between chemosensitive (CS) and CR PDX tumors with whole exome and RNA sequencing and selected candidate genes. Correlations between candidate gene expression and clinicopathological variables were explored using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the Human Protein Atlas (THPA).
Results
Three CR and four CS HGSC PDX tumor models were successfully established. RNA sequencing analysis of the PDX tumors revealed that 146 genes were significantly up-regulated and 54 genes down-regulated in the CR group compared with the CS group. Whole exome sequencing analysis showed 39 mutation sites were identified which only occurred in CR group. Differential expression of SAP25, HLA-DPA1, AKT3, and PIK3R5 genes and mutation of TMEM205 and POLR2A may have important functions in the progression of ovarian cancer chemoresistance. According to TCGA data analysis, patients with high HLA-DPA1 expression were more resistant to initial chemotherapy (p=0.030; odds ratio, 1.845).
Conclusion
We successfully established CR ovarian cancer PDX mouse models. PDX-based genetic profiling study could be used to select some candidate genes that could be targeted to overcome chemoresistance of ovarian cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Creation and Validation of Patient-Derived Cancer Model Using Peritoneal and Pleural Effusion in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer: An Early Experience
    Ruri Nishie, Tomohito Tanaka, Kensuke Hirosuna, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Hikaru Murakami, Hiromitsu Tsuchihashi, Akihiko Toji, Shoko Ueda, Natsuko Morita, Sousuke Hashida, Atsushi Daimon, Shinichi Terada, Hiroshi Maruoka, Hiromi Konishi, Yuhei Kogata, Kohei Tan
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2718.     CrossRef
  • Uncovering miRNA–mRNA Regulatory Networks Related to Olaparib Resistance and Resensitization of BRCA2MUT Ovarian Cancer PEO1-OR Cells with the ATR/CHK1 Pathway Inhibitors
    Łukasz Biegała, Damian Kołat, Arkadiusz Gajek, Elżbieta Płuciennik, Agnieszka Marczak, Agnieszka Śliwińska, Michał Mikula, Aneta Rogalska
    Cells.2024; 13(10): 867.     CrossRef
  • Patient-derived xenograft models in cancer therapy: technologies and applications
    Yihan Liu, Wantao Wu, Changjing Cai, Hao Zhang, Hong Shen, Ying Han
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deregulations of RNA Pol II Subunits in Cancer
    Martina Muste Sadurni, Marco Saponaro
    Applied Biosciences.2023; 2(3): 459.     CrossRef
  • Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses Reveal the Mechanism of Corpus Luteum Cyst Formation in Pigs
    Jiage Dai, Jiabao Cai, Taipeng Zhang, Mingyue Pang, Xiaoling Xu, Jiahua Bai, Yan Liu, Yusheng Qin
    Genes.2023; 14(10): 1848.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Chemoresistance—How Preclinical Data Could Help to Modify Therapeutic Strategy in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
    Jacek Wilczyński, Edyta Paradowska, Justyna Wilczyńska, Miłosz Wilczyński
    Current Oncology.2023; 31(1): 229.     CrossRef
  • Personalization of Therapy in High-Grade Serous Tubo-Ovarian Cancer—The Possibility or the Necessity?
    Jacek Wilczyński, Edyta Paradowska, Miłosz Wilczyński
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 14(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • PIK3R5 genetic predictors of hypertension induced by VEGF-pathway inhibitors
    Julia C. F. Quintanilha, Alessandro Racioppi, Jin Wang, Amy S. Etheridge, Stefanie Denning, Carol E. Peña, Andrew D. Skol, Daniel J. Crona, Danyu Lin, Federico Innocenti
    The Pharmacogenomics Journal.2022; 22(1): 82.     CrossRef
  • AKT Isoforms Interplay in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Prognosis and Characterization
    Eros Azzalini, Domenico Tierno, Michele Bartoletti, Renzo Barbazza, Giorgio Giorda, Fabio Puglisi, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Nunzia Simona Losito, Daniela Russo, Giorgio Stanta, Vincenzo Canzonieri, Serena Bonin
    Cancers.2022; 14(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of cancer gene mutations using targeted sequencing in matched primary and recurrent gastric cancers after chemotherapy
    Yeon-Ju Huh, Sung-Yup Cho, Min-Sun Cho, Kyoung-Eun Lee, Joo-Ho Lee
    Genes & Genomics.2022; 44(11): 1425.     CrossRef
  • Validation of a Patient-Derived Xenograft Model for Cervical Cancer Based on Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization
    Shunsuke Miyamoto, Tomohito Tanaka, Kensuke Hirosuna, Ruri Nishie, Shoko Ueda, Sousuke Hashida, Shinichi Terada, Hiromi Konishi, Yuhei Kogata, Kohei Taniguchi, Kazumasa Komura, Masahide Ohmichi
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2969.     CrossRef
  • HCP5, as the sponge of miR-1291, facilitates AML cell proliferation and restrains apoptosis via increasing PIK3R5 expression
    Yan Liu, Xue-Bing Jing, Zhen-Cheng Wang, Qing-Kun Han
    Human Genomics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Leveraging Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Epigenomics to Understand the Biology and Chemoresistance of Ovarian Cancer
    Sandra Muñoz-Galván, Amancio Carnero
    Cancers.2021; 13(16): 4029.     CrossRef
  • CD83, a Novel MAPK Signaling Pathway Interactor, Determines Ovarian Cancer Cell Fate
    Aalia Batool, Hao Liu, Yi-Xun Liu, Su-Ren Chen
    Cancers.2020; 12(8): 2269.     CrossRef
  • A recombinant platform to characterize the role of transmembrane protein hTMEM205 in Pt(ii)-drug resistance and extrusion
    Marc J Gallenito, Tahir S Qasim, Jasmine N Tutol, Ved Prakash, Sheel C Dodani, Gabriele Meloni
    Metallomics.2020; 12(10): 1542.     CrossRef
  • Function, Regulation and Biological Roles of PI3Kγ Variants
    Bernd Nürnberg, Sandra Beer-Hammer
    Biomolecules.2019; 9(9): 427.     CrossRef
  • 10,909 View
  • 341 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of Clinical Features and Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer according to Tumorigenicity in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models
Kyung Jin Eoh, Young Shin Chung, So Hyun Lee, Sun-Ae Park, Hee Jung Kim, Wookyeom Yang, In Ok Lee, Jung-Yun Lee, Hanbyoul Cho, Doo Byung Chay, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Jae-Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):956-963.   Published online October 17, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.181
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Although the use of xenograft models is increasing, few studies have compared the clinical features or outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients according to the tumorigenicity of engrafted specimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether tumorigenicity was associated with the clinical features and outcomes of EOC patients.
Materials and Methods
Eighty-eight EOC patients who underwent primary or interval debulking surgery from June 2014 to December 2015 were included. Fresh tumor specimens were implanted subcutaneously on each flank of immunodeficient mice. Patient characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and germline mutation spectra were compared according to tumorigenicity.
Results
Xenografts were established successfully from 49 of 88 specimens. Tumorigenicity was associated with lymphovascular invasion and there was a propensity to engraft successfully with high-grade tumors. Tumors from patientswho underwent non-optimal (residual disease ≥ 1 cm) primary orinterval debulking surgery had a significantly greater propensity to achieve tumorigenicity than those who received optimal surgery. In addition, patients whose tumors became engrafted seemed to have a shorter PFS and more frequent germline mutations than patients whose tumors failed to engraft. Tumorigenicity was a significant factor for predicting PFS with advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and high-grade cancers.
Conclusions
Tumorigenicity in a xenograft model was a strong prognostic factor and was associated with more aggressive tumors in EOC patients. Xenograft models can be useful as a preclinical tool to predict prognosis and could be applied to further pharmacologic and genomic studies on personalized treatments.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Establishment and characterization of ovarian clear cell carcinoma patient-derived xenografts
    Joseph J. Caumanns, Shang Li, Gert J. Meersma, Evelien W. Duiker, Ate G. J. van der Zee, G. Bea A. Wisman, Steven de Jong
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • TOWARDS Study: Patient-Derived Xenograft Engraftment Predicts Poor Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Christos Vaklavas, Cindy B. Matsen, Zhengtao Chu, Kenneth M. Boucher, Sandra D. Scherer, Satya Pathi, Anna Beck, Kirstyn E. Brownson, Saundra S. Buys, Namita Chittoria, Elyse D'Astous, H. Evin Gulbahce, N. Lynn Henry, Stephen Kimani, Jane Porretta, Regina
    JCO Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Generation, evolution, interfering factors, applications, and challenges of patient-derived xenograft models in immunodeficient mice
    Mingtang Zeng, Zijing Ruan, Jiaxi Tang, Maozhu Liu, Chengji Hu, Ping Fan, Xinhua Dai
    Cancer Cell International.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer “Avatars”: Patient-Derived Xenograft Growth Correlation with Postoperative Recurrence and Survival in Pancreaticobiliary Cancer
    Isaac T Lynch, Amro M Abdelrahman, Roberto Alva-Ruiz, Alessandro Fogliati, Rondell P Graham, Rory Smoot, Mark J Truty
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 237(3): 483.     CrossRef
  • Identification of Prognostic Markers of Gynecologic Cancers Utilizing Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Models
    Ha-Yeon Shin, Eun-ju Lee, Wookyeom Yang, Hyo Sun Kim, Dawn Chung, Hanbyoul Cho, Jae-Hoon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 829.     CrossRef
  • Experimental models for ovarian cancer research
    Sum In Tsang, Ayon A. Hassan, Sally K.Y. To, Alice S.T. Wong
    Experimental Cell Research.2022; 416(1): 113150.     CrossRef
  • Preclinical models of epithelial ovarian cancer: practical considerations and challenges for a meaningful application
    Alessandra Ciucci, Marianna Buttarelli, Anna Fagotti, Giovanni Scambia, Daniela Gallo
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Harnessing preclinical models for the interrogation of ovarian cancer
    Tianyu Qin, Junpeng Fan, Funian Lu, Li Zhang, Chen Liu, Qiyue Xiong, Yang Zhao, Gang Chen, Chaoyang Sun
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of patient‐derived xenograft engraftment in pediatric sarcomas
    Helena Castillo‐Ecija, Guillem Pascual‐Pasto, Sara Perez‐Jaume, Claudia Resa‐Pares, Monica Vila‐Ubach, Carles Monterrubio, Ana Jimenez‐Cabaco, Merce Baulenas‐Farres, Oscar Muñoz‐Aznar, Noelia Salvador, Maria Cuadrado‐Vilanova, Nagore G Olaciregui, Leire B
    The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research.2021; 7(4): 338.     CrossRef
  • Patient-Derived Xenograft Models in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Tomohito Tanaka, Ruri Nishie, Shoko Ueda, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Sousuke Hashida, Hiromi Konishi, Shinichi Terada, Yuhei Kogata, Hiroshi Sasaki, Satoshi Tsunetoh, Kohei Taniguchi, Kazumasa Komura, Masahide Ohmichi
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(17): 9369.     CrossRef
  • Biliary tract cancer patient-derived xenografts: Surgeon impact on individualized medicine
    Jennifer L. Leiting, Stephen J. Murphy, John R. Bergquist, Matthew C. Hernandez, Tommy Ivanics, Amro M. Abdelrahman, Lin Yang, Isaac Lynch, James B. Smadbeck, Sean P. Cleary, David M. Nagorney, Michael S. Torbenson, Rondell P. Graham, Lewis R. Roberts, Gr
    JHEP Reports.2020; 2(2): 100068.     CrossRef
  • Patient-derived xenograft model engraftment predicts poor prognosis after surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer
    Qi Chen, Tao Wei, Jianxin Wang, Qi Zhang, Jin Li, Jingying Zhang, Lei Ni, Yi Wang, Xueli Bai, Tingbo Liang
    Pancreatology.2020; 20(3): 485.     CrossRef
  • A Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
    Suad M. Abdirahman, Michael Christie, Adele Preaudet, Marie C. U. Burstroem, Dmitri Mouradov, Belinda Lee, Oliver M. Sieber, Tracy L. Putoczki
    Cancers.2020; 12(9): 2340.     CrossRef
  • High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Basic Sciences, Clinical and Therapeutic Standpoints
    Michael-Antony Lisio, Lili Fu, Alicia Goyeneche, Zu-hua Gao, Carlos Telleria
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(4): 952.     CrossRef
  • Efficient use of patient-derived organoids as a preclinical model for gynecologic tumors
    Yoshiaki Maru, Naotake Tanaka, Makiko Itami, Yoshitaka Hippo
    Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 154(1): 189.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Models
    Yoshiaki Maru, Yoshitaka Hippo
    Cells.2019; 8(5): 505.     CrossRef
  • Establishment of patient‐derived xenograft model in ovarian cancer and its influence factors analysis
    Jianfa Wu, Yunxi Zheng, Qi Tian, Ming Yao, Xiaofang Yi
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2019; 45(10): 2062.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian Cancers: Genetic Abnormalities, Tumor Heterogeneity and Progression, Clonal Evolution and Cancer Stem Cells
    Ugo Testa, Eleonora Petrucci, Luca Pasquini, Germana Castelli, Elvira Pelosi
    Medicines.2018; 5(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • 9,039 View
  • 239 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref
Close layer
Detection of Germline Mutations in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using Multi-gene Panels: Beyond BRCA1/2
Kyung Jin Eoh, Ji Eun Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Seung-Tae Lee, Ji Soo Park, Jung Woo Han, Jung-Yun Lee, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):917-925.   Published online September 27, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.220
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows simultaneous sequencing of multiple cancer susceptibility genes and may represent a more efficient and less expensive approach than sequential testing. We assessed the frequency of germline mutations in individuals with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), using multi-gene panels and NGS.
Materials and Methods
Patients with EOC (n=117) with/without a family history of breast or ovarian cancer were recruited consecutively, from March 2016 toDecember 2016.GermlineDNAwas sequenced using 35-gene NGS panel, in order to identify mutations. Upon the detection of a genetic alteration using the panel, results were cross-validated using direct sequencing.
Results
Thirty-eight patients (32.5%) had 39 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in eight genes, including BRCA1 (n=21), BRCA2 (n=10), BRIP1 (n=1), CHEK2 (n=2), MSH2 (n=1), POLE (n=1), RAD51C (n=2), and RAD51D (n=2). Among 64 patients with a family history of cancer, 27 (42.2%) had 27 pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations, and six (9.3%) had mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2, such as CHECK2, MSH2, POLE, and RAD51C. Fifty-five patients (47.0%) were identified to carry only variants of uncertain significance.
Conclusion
Using the multi-gene panel test, we found that, of all patients included in our study, 32.5% had germline cancer-predisposing mutations. NGS was confirmed to substantially improve the detection rates of a wide spectrum of mutations in EOC patients compared with those obtained with the BRCA1/2 testing alone.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Germline mutations of 4567 patients with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer spectrum in Thailand
    Chalermkiat Kansuttiviwat, Pongtawat Lertwilaiwittaya, Ekkapong Roothumnong, Panee Nakthong, Peerawat Dungort, Chutima Meesamarnpong, Warisara Tansa-Nga, Khontawan Pongsuktavorn, Supakit Wiboonthanasarn, Warunya Tititumjariya, Nannipa Phuphuripan, Chittap
    npj Genomic Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Germline Mutational Landscape and Novel Targetable RAD51D Variant in Chinese Patients With Ovarian Cancer
    Zheng Feng, Siyu Chen, Na An, Zhihui Xiu, Xingzhu Ju, Xiaojun Chen, Rui Bi, Jie Wang, Shida Zhu, Xiaohua Wu, Hao Wen
    JCO Global Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation
    Siddhartha Yadav, Fergus J. Couch, Susan M. Domchek
    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine.2024; 14(8): a041318.     CrossRef
  • Germline RAD51C and RAD51D Mutations in High-Risk Chinese Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Patients and Families
    Ava Kwong, Cecilia Yuen Sze Ho, Chun Hang Au, Sze Keong Tey, Edmond Shiu Kwan Ma
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(8): 866.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of PALB2 Pathogenic Germline Variant
    Min-Chae Kang, R.N., Jong Eun Park, Mi-Ae Jang, Dongju Won, Boyoung Park, Seeyoun Lee, Dong Ock Lee, Kum Hei Ryu, Yoon-Jung Chang, Sun-Young Kong
    Laboratory Medicine Online.2024; 14(4): 311.     CrossRef
  • Molecular profiling reveals novel therapeutic targets and clonal evolution in ovarian clear cell carcinoma
    Angel Chao, Chen-Yang Huang, Willie Yu, Chiao-Yun Lin, Hao Lin, An-Shine Chao, Cheng-Tao Lin, Hung-Hsueh Chou, Kuang-Gen Huang, Huei-Jean Huang, Ting-Chang Chang, Steven G. Rozen, Ren-Chin Wu, Chyong-Huey Lai
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Next-generation sequencing uncovers crucial mutated genes and potential therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer patients
    Tianjiao Zhao
    American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(10): 5990.     CrossRef
  • The expression and mutation of BRCA1/2 genes in ovarian cancer: a global systematic study
    Dinh-Toi Chu, Mai Vu Ngoc Suong, Hue Vu Thi, Thuy-Duong Vu, Manh-Hung Nguyen, Vijai Singh
    Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics.2023; 23(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Using species richness calculations to model the global profile of unsampled pathogenic variants: Examples from BRCA1 and BRCA2
    Nandana D. Rao, Brian H. Shirts, Alvaro Galli
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0278010.     CrossRef
  • Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review
    Serena Bertozzi, Ambrogio Londero, Anjeza Xholli, Guglielmo Azioni, Roberta Di Vora, Michele Paudice, Ines Bucimazza, Carla Cedolini, Angelo Cagnacci
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(4): 1422.     CrossRef
  • Deregulated Metabolic Pathways in Ovarian Cancer: Cause and Consequence
    Roopak Murali, Vaishnavi Balasubramaniam, Satish Srinivas, Sandhya Sundaram, Ganesh Venkatraman, Sudha Warrier, Arun Dharmarajan, Rajesh Kumar Gandhirajan
    Metabolites.2023; 13(4): 560.     CrossRef
  • Factors predictingBRCA1/2pathogenic variants in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Giovanni Innella, Lea Godino, Giulia Erini, Antonio De Leo, Donatella Santini, Anna Myriam Perrone, Pierandrea De Iaco, Claudio Zamagni, Daniela Turchetti
    Journal of Clinical Pathology.2023; 76(8): 510.     CrossRef
  • Partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) pathogenic variants and ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Priyanka Narayan, Muhammad Danyal Ahsan, Emily M. Webster, Luiza Perez, Sarah R. Levi, Benedict Harvey, Isabel Wolfe, Shanice Beaumont, Jesse T. Brewer, Drew Siegel, Charlene Thomas, Paul Christos, Andy Hickner, Eloise Chapman-Davis, Evelyn Cantillo, Kevi
    Gynecologic Oncology.2023; 177: 72.     CrossRef
  • Early-Onset Ovarian Cancer <30 Years: What Do We Know about Its Genetic Predisposition?
    Klara Horackova, Marketa Janatova, Petra Kleiblova, Zdenek Kleibl, Jana Soukupova
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(23): 17020.     CrossRef
  • Effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy on sex steroid hormone serum levels among postmenopausal women: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Phuong L. Mai, Austin Miller, Amanda Black, Roni T. Falk, John F. Boggess, Katherine Tucker, Ashley R. Stuckey, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Cheung Wong, Thomas T. Amatruda, Kelly J. Wilkinson, Susan C. Modesitt, S. Diane Yamada, Kristin L. Bixel, Gretchen E. Gl
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2022; 227(1): 61.e1.     CrossRef
  • Hereditary gynecologic tumors and precision cancer medicine
    Chikako Ogawa, Akira Hirasawa, Naoyuki Ida, Keiichiro Nakamura, Hisashi Masuyama
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2022; 48(5): 1076.     CrossRef
  • Discovery of BRCA1/BRCA2 founder variants by haplotype analysis
    Won Kyung Kwon, Hyeok-Jae Jang, Jeong Eon Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Jai Min Ryu, Jonghan Yu, Ja-Hyun Jang, Jong-Won Kim
    Cancer Genetics.2022; 266-267: 19.     CrossRef
  • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Providing Evidence of Predisposition Genes
    Sidrah Shah, Alison Cheung, Mikolaj Kutka, Matin Sheriff, Stergios Boussios
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(13): 8113.     CrossRef
  • Germline multigene panel testing revealed a BRCA2 pathogenic variant in a patient with suspected Lynch syndrome
    Tomoko Yoshihama, Akira Hirasawa, Kokichi Sugano, Teruhiko Yoshida, Mineko Ushiama, Arisa Ueki, Tomoko Akahane, Yoshiko Nanki, Kensuke Sakai, Takeshi Makabe, Wataru Yamagami, Nobuyuki Susumu, Kaori Kameyama, Kenjiro Kosaki, Daisuke Aoki
    International Cancer Conference Journal.2021; 10(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of cancer susceptibility variants in patients with multiple Lynch syndrome related cancers
    Yoon Young Choi, Su-Jin Shin, Jae Eun Lee, Lisa Madlensky, Seung-Tae Lee, Ji Soo Park, Jeong-Hyeon Jo, Hyunki Kim, Daniela Nachmanson, Xiaojun Xu, Sung Hoon Noh, Jae-Ho Cheong, Olivier Harismendy
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma in a female patient with a germline splicing variant RAD51D c.904-2A > T: a case report
    Mashu Futagawa, Hideki Yamamoto, Mariko Kochi, Yusaku Urakawa, Reimi Sogawa, Fumino Kato, Mika Okazawa-Sakai, Daisuke Ennishi, Katsunori Shinozaki, Hirofumi Inoue, Hiroyuki Yanai, Akira Hirasawa
    Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A dominant RAD51C pathogenic splicing variant predisposes to breast and ovarian cancer in the Newfoundland population due to founder effect
    Lesa M. Dawson, Kerri N. Smith, Salem Werdyani, Robyn Ndikumana, Cindy Penney, Louisa L. Wiede, Kendra L. Smith, Justin A. Pater, Andrée MacMillan, Jane Green, Sheila Drover, Terry‐Lynn Young, Darren D. O’Rielly
    Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Germline and Somatic BRCA1/2 Mutations in 172 Chinese Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Yan You, Lei Li, Junliang Lu, Huanwen Wu, Jing Wang, Jie Gao, Ming Wu, Zhiyong Liang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations are associated with high susceptibility to ovarian cancer: mutation prevalence and precise risk estimates based on a pooled analysis of ~30,000 cases
    Malwina Suszynska, Magdalena Ratajska, Piotr Kozlowski
    Journal of Ovarian Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Summary of BARD1 Mutations and Precise Estimation of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Associated with the Mutations
    Malwina Suszynska, Piotr Kozlowski
    Genes.2020; 11(7): 798.     CrossRef
  • Exon splicing analysis of intronic variants in multigene cancer panel testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer
    Jin‐Sun Ryu, Hye‐Young Lee, Eun Hae Cho, Kyong‐Ah Yoon, Min‐Kyeong Kim, Jungnam Joo, Eun‐Sook Lee, Han‐Sung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Dong Ock Lee, Myong Cheol Lim, Sun‐Young Kong
    Cancer Science.2020; 111(10): 3912.     CrossRef
  • RAD51C and RAD51D in the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome
    Ana Isabel Sánchez Bermúdez, M.ª Desamparados Sarabia Meseguer, Verónica Guardiola Castillo, Francisco Ruiz Espejo, José Antonio Noguera Velasco
    Revista de Medicina de Laboratorio.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic yield and clinical utility of a comprehensive gene panel for hereditary tumor syndromes
    Jonas Henn, Isabel Spier, Ronja S. Adam, Stefanie Holzapfel, Siegfried Uhlhaas, Katrin Kayser, Guido Plotz, Sophia Peters, Stefan Aretz
    Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Large-scale meta-analysis of mutations identified in panels of breast/ovarian cancer-related genes — Providing evidence of cancer predisposition genes
    Malwina Suszynska, Katarzyna Klonowska, Anna J. Jasinska, Piotr Kozlowski
    Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 153(2): 452.     CrossRef
  • Targeted sequencing of a specific gene panel detects a high frequency of ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations in ovarian clear cell carcinoma
    Yu-Fa Su, Eing-Mei Tsai, Chih-Chieh Chen, Chun-Chieh Wu, Tze-Kiong Er
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2019; 494: 1.     CrossRef
  • Hereditary ovarian cancers: state of the art
    Angela Toss, Eleonora Molinaro, Margaret Sammarini, Maria C. Del Savio, Laura Cortesi, Fabio Facchinetti, Giovanni Grandi
    Minerva Medica.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • BRCA Mutation Status to Personalize Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Study
    Claudia Marchetti, Rossella De Leo, Angela Musella, Marco D’Indinosante, Ettore Capoluongo, Angelo Minucci, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Fagotti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2018; 25(12): 3701.     CrossRef
  • Spectrum and Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Group of 333 Patients
    Magdalena Koczkowska, Natalia Krawczynska, Maciej Stukan, Alina Kuzniacka, Izabela Brozek, Marcin Sniadecki, Jaroslaw Debniak, Dariusz Wydra, Wojciech Biernat, Piotr Kozlowski, Janusz Limon, Bartosz Wasag, Magdalena Ratajska
    Cancers.2018; 10(11): 442.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of genetic assessment for BRCA-associated gynaecologic malignancies: a Canadian multisociety roadmap
    Jeanna M McCuaig, Tracy L Stockley, Patricia Shaw, Michael Fung-Kee-Fung, Alon D Altman, James Bentley, Marcus Q Bernardini, Beatrice Cormier, Hal Hirte, Katharina Kieser, Andree MacMillan, Wendy S Meschino, Karen Panabaker, Renee Perrier, Diane Provenche
    Journal of Medical Genetics.2018; 55(9): 571.     CrossRef
  • 16,455 View
  • 808 Download
  • 35 Web of Science
  • 34 Crossref
Close layer
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Cremophor-Free Polymeric Micelle Formulation of Paclitaxel as First-Line Treatment for Ovarian Cancer: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG-3021)
Shin-Wha Lee, Yong-Man Kim, Chi Heum Cho, Young Tae Kim, Seok Mo Kim, Soo Young Hur, Jae-Hoon Kim, Byoung-Gie Kim, Seung-Cheol Kim, Hee-Sug Ryu, Soon Beom Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(1):195-203.   Published online March 21, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.376
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Genexol-PM is a biodegradable cremophor EL–free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel. Here,we compared efficacy and safety of Genexol-PM plus carboplatin versus Genexol plus carboplatin for ovarian cancer treatment.
Materials and Methods
In this multicenter, randomized, phase II study, patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 with 5 area under the curve carboplatin every 3weeks (6 cycles). The primary endpointwas the carbohydrate antigen 125 and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumor composite overall response rate (ORR).
Results
Of 131 enrolled patients, 98 were included in intention-to-treat analysis. Mean dosages were 260.00±0.00 mg/m2 Genexol-PM or 174.24±3.81 mg/m2 Genexol. Median followup was 18.0 months (range, 6.1 to 33.8 months). ORR was 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4 to 95.6) with Genexol-PM, and 77.1% (95% CI, 67.1 to 87.1) with Genexol (noninferiority threshold, 16.3%). Median time to progression was 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.2) with Genexol-PM and 15.4 months (95% CI, 13.2 to 29.6) with Genexol (p=0.550). Overall, six patients died. Neutropenia was the most common toxicity (incidences of 86.0% vs. 77.1%, p=0.120). Peripheral neuropathy incidences were 84.0% versus 64.6% (p= 0.148). Peripheral neuropathy of ≥ grade 3 occurred in one patient receiving Genexol. All toxicities were manageable.
Conclusion
Genexol-PM plus carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and well-tolerated toxicities compared with the standard paclitaxel regimen. Further studies are warranted to optimize the dose and schedule, and to investigate long-term outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Medical nanoscale materials for virus-induced cervical cancer therapeutic modalities: For targeting delivery
    Adane Adugna, Mamaru Getinet, Gashaw Azanaw Amare, Mohammed Jemal
    OpenNano.2025; 21: 100221.     CrossRef
  • From Pioneering Discoveries to Innovative Therapies: A Journey Through the History and Advancements of Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Treatment
    Fatemah Basingab, Omniah Alshahrani, Ibtehal Alansari, Nada Almarghalani, Nada Alshelali, Abeer Alsaiary, Najwa Alharbi, Kawther Zaher
    Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy.2025; Volume 17: 27.     CrossRef
  • Nano-drug delivery systems based on biodegradable polymers for the therapy of gynecological malignancies
    Keer Jin, Hanxue Zhang, Yuwei Yang, Yan Gao
    International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials.2024; 73(14): 1262.     CrossRef
  • Dual stimuli-responsive polymeric prodrug consisting of reversible covalent bonded celastrol for tumor targeted delivery
    Jiangtao Su, Meng Rao, Heshuang Dai, Le Cai, Fan Ye, Lu Ye, Yuchen Hu, Ban Chen, Xiaoxia Guo
    Macromolecular Research.2024; 32(2): 173.     CrossRef
  • Designing nanodiscs as versatile platforms for on-demand therapy
    Qianwen Mu, Haolan Deng, Xiaoyu An, Gang Liu, Chao Liu
    Nanoscale.2024; 16(5): 2220.     CrossRef
  • Innovative strategies for effective paclitaxel delivery: Recent developments and prospects
    Sławomir Wileński, Agnieszka Koper, Paulina Śledzińska, Marek Bebyn, Krzysztof Koper
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2024; 30(2): 367.     CrossRef
  • Platelet-derived drug delivery systems: Pioneering treatment for cancer, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, and beyond
    Yalan Zhu, Lingling Xu, Yong Kang, Qinzhen Cheng, Yiling He, Xiaoyuan Ji
    Biomaterials.2024; 306: 122478.     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticle-Based Immunotherapy for Reversing T-Cell Exhaustion
    Fei Li, Yahong Wang, Dandan Chen, Yunjie Du
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(3): 1396.     CrossRef
  • Delivery of Nucleic Acid Drugs for Tumor Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges
    Dandan Sun, Wenjia Tan, Jianan Zhao, Yafei Tian, Siqi Li, Zhiqi Zhang, Xinzhe Dong, Xiaonan Liu, Na Liu, Ping Jiao, Jie Ma
    Fundamental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of high-dose polymeric nanoparticle micellar paclitaxel on improved progression-free survival in patients with optimally resected stage III or IV high-grade carcinoma of the ovary: a prospective cohort study with historical controls
    Soo Jin Park, Joo-Hyuk Son, Tae-Wook Kong, Suk-Joon Chang, Hee Seung Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Co-Assembly of Cancer Drugs with Cyclo-HH Peptides: Insights from Simulations and Experiments
    Anastasia Vlachou, Vijay Bhooshan Kumar, Om Shanker Tiwari, Sigal Rencus-Lazar, Yu Chen, Busra Ozguney, Ehud Gazit, Phanourios Tamamis
    ACS Applied Bio Materials.2024; 7(4): 2309.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: Towards Personalized Medicine
    Carlos López-Portugués, María Montes-Bayón, Paula Díez
    Proteomes.2024; 12(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Internalization of transferrin-tagged Myxococcus xanthus encapsulins into mesenchymal stem cells
    Anna N. Gabashvili, Natalya A. Alexandrushkina, Elizaveta N. Mochalova, Daria V. Goliusova, Ekaterina N. Sapozhnikova, Pavel I. Makarevich, Petr I. Nikitin
    Experimental Biology and Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Functionalized Polymeric Micelles for Targeted Cancer Therapy: Steps from Conceptualization to Clinical Trials
    Ana Serras, Célia Faustino, Lídia Pinheiro
    Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(8): 1047.     CrossRef
  • Polyesters and Polyester Nano- and Microcarriers for Drug Delivery
    Stanislaw Slomkowski, Teresa Basinska, Mariusz Gadzinowski, Damian Mickiewicz
    Polymers.2024; 16(17): 2503.     CrossRef
  • Nanotheranostics for gynecological cancers: a path forward for Africa
    Mutia Kehwalla Aza, Anavami Suberu, Mahmood Balogun, Goodness Adegbola, Mohamed Alie Sankoh, Thomas Oyediran, Nicholas Aderinto, Gbolahan Olatunji, Emmanuel Kokori, Chinonyelum Emmanuel Agbo
    Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pharmacokinetic behaviors of soft nanoparticulate formulations of chemotherapeutics
    Mahua Sarkar, Yang Wang, Oscar Ekpenyong, Dong Liang, Huan Xie
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer treatment and toxicity outlook of nanoparticles
    Neetika, Mamta Sharma, Pankaj Thakur, Paras Gaur, Gokana Mohana Rani, Sarvesh Rustagi, Rishi Kumar Talreja, Vishal Chaudhary
    Environmental Research.2023; 237: 116870.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Nanopaclitaxel Formulation for Cancer Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials
    Xiangmin Deng, Xiaoqin Huang, Xiaoyan Dong, Genxiang Mao, Wenmin Xing
    Nanomedicine.2023; 18(10): 833.     CrossRef
  • Development and Perspectives: Multifunctional Nucleic Acid Nanomedicines for Treatment of Gynecological Cancers
    Tetiana Korzun, Abraham S. Moses, Parham Diba, Ariana L. Sattler, Brennan Olson, Olena R. Taratula, Tanja Pejovic, Daniel L. Marks, Oleh Taratula
    Small.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanoprobe-based molecular imaging for tumor stratification
    Xianbin Ma, Mingchuan Mao, Jiaqi He, Chao Liang, Hai-Yan Xie
    Chemical Society Reviews.2023; 52(18): 6447.     CrossRef
  • Magic shotgun over magic bullet for treatment of ovarian cancer via polymeric nanoparticles
    Bakr Ahmed, Anuradha Sharma, Zakiya Usmani, Garima Sharma, Joga Singh, Radhika Yadav, Indu Sharma, Indu Pal Kaur
    Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.2023; 88: 104945.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Tolerability of Weekly Genexol-PM, a Cremophor-Free Polymeric Micelle Formulation of Paclitaxel, with Carboplatin in Gynecologic Cancer: A Phase I Study
    So Hyun Nam, Shin-Wha Lee, Young-Jae Lee, Yong Man Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1346.     CrossRef
  • Effective Cancer Management: Inimitable Role of Phytochemical Based Nano- Formulations
    Aman Upaganlawar, Satish Polshettiwar, Sushil Raut, Amol Tagalpallewar, Vishal Pande
    Current Drug Metabolism.2022; 23(11): 869.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of triblock copolymeric micelles based on α- and ε-poly(L-lysine): a Cornelian choice
    Franck Marquet, Viorica Patrulea, Gerrit Borchard
    Polymer Journal.2022; 54(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Neurosurgery at the crossroads of immunology and nanotechnology. New reality in the COVID-19 pandemic
    Vladimir A. Ljubimov, Arshia Ramesh, Saya Davani, Moise Danielpour, Joshua J. Breunig, Keith L. Black
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 181: 114033.     CrossRef
  • Nanocarriers targeting the diseases of the pancreas
    Nurbanu Demirtürk, Erem Bilensoy
    European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.2022; 170: 10.     CrossRef
  • The development and progress of nanomedicine for esophageal cancer diagnosis and treatment
    Xiaokun Li, Lingmin Chen, Siyuan Luan, Jianfeng Zhou, Xin Xiao, Yushang Yang, Chengyi Mao, Pinhao Fang, Longqi Chen, Xiaoxi Zeng, Huile Gao, Yong Yuan
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2022; 86: 873.     CrossRef
  • Beyond separation: Membranes towards medicine
    Ying Xie, Zhenyu Chu, Wanqin Jin
    Journal of Membrane Science Letters.2022; 2(1): 100020.     CrossRef
  • Modulation of TLR/NF-κB/NLRP Signaling by Bioactive Phytocompounds: A Promising Strategy to Augment Cancer Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy
    Sajad Fakhri, Seyed Zachariah Moradi, Akram Yarmohammadi, Fatemeh Narimani, Carly E. Wallace, Anupam Bishayee
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gold Nanorods for Drug and Gene Delivery: An Overview of Recent Advancements
    Atieh Jahangiri-Manesh, Marziyeh Mousazadeh, Shirinsadat Taji, Abbas Bahmani, Atefeh Zarepour, Ali Zarrabi, Esmaeel Sharifi, Mostafa Azimzadeh
    Pharmaceutics.2022; 14(3): 664.     CrossRef
  • Gene Therapy for Malignant and Benign Gynaecological Disorders: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Success Story
    Ekati Drakopoulou, Nicholas P. Anagnou, Kalliopi I. Pappa
    Cancers.2022; 14(13): 3238.     CrossRef
  • Engineering nanosystems to overcome barriers to cancer diagnosis and treatment
    Suhaila O. Alhaj-Suliman, Emad I. Wafa, Aliasger K. Salem
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 189: 114482.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Signatures of Surface-Modified Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanoparticles in Differentiated THP-1 Cells Derived with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics
    Mohammad A. Al-natour, Salah Abdelrazig, Amir M. Ghaemmaghami, Cameron Alexander, Dong-Hyun Kim
    ACS Omega.2022; 7(33): 28806.     CrossRef
  • Pathogen-derived peptides in drug targeting and its therapeutic approach
    Seok-Jun Mun, Euni Cho, Jae-Sung Kim, Chul-Su Yang
    Journal of Controlled Release.2022; 350: 716.     CrossRef
  • Application of single and cooperative different delivery systems for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration
    Zongtai Liu, Changfeng Fu
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Engineering the Tumor Immune Microenvironment through Minimally Invasive Interventions
    Koustav Pal, Rahul A. Sheth
    Cancers.2022; 15(1): 196.     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticle delivery systems to combat drug resistance in ovarian cancer
    Emily M. Miller, Timothy M. Samec, Angela A. Alexander-Bryant
    Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine.2021; 31: 102309.     CrossRef
  • Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery
    Michael J. Mitchell, Margaret M. Billingsley, Rebecca M. Haley, Marissa E. Wechsler, Nicholas A. Peppas, Robert Langer
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.2021; 20(2): 101.     CrossRef
  • Clinical applications of nanomedicines in lung cancer treatment
    Mohammad Norouzi, Pierre Hardy
    Acta Biomaterialia.2021; 121: 134.     CrossRef
  • Lyophilization stabilizes clinical‐stage core‐crosslinked polymeric micelles to overcome cold chain supply challenges
    Tarun Ojha, Qizhi Hu, Claudio Colombo, Jan Wit, Michiel van Geijn, Mies J. van Steenbergen, Mahsa Bagheri, Hiltrud Königs‐Werner, Eva Miriam Buhl, Ruchi Bansal, Yang Shi, Wim E. Hennink, Gert Storm, Cristianne J. F. Rijcken, Twan Lammers
    Biotechnology Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of next generation nanomedicine-based approaches for the treatment of cancer: we've barely scratched the surface
    Shannon R. Tracey, Peter Smyth, Caroline J. Barelle, Christopher J. Scott
    Biochemical Society Transactions.2021; 49(5): 2253.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies
    Ellen Cusano, Chelsea Wong, Eddy Taguedong, Marcus Vaska, Tasnima Abedin, Nancy Nixon, Safiya Karim, Patricia Tang, Daniel Y. C. Heng, Doreen Ezeife
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 4894.     CrossRef
  • Engineering Considerations to Produce Bioactive Compounds from Plant Cell Suspension Culture in Bioreactors
    Elizabeth Alejandra Motolinía-Alcántara, Carlos Omar Castillo-Araiza, Mario Rodríguez-Monroy, Angélica Román-Guerrero, Francisco Cruz-Sosa
    Plants.2021; 10(12): 2762.     CrossRef
  • Clinical applications of nanomedicine in cancer therapy
    Mohammad Norouzi, Mehrnaz Amerian, Mahshid Amerian, Fatemeh Atyabi
    Drug Discovery Today.2020; 25(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • Targeting and extending the eukaryotic druggable genome with natural products: cytoskeletal targets of natural products
    April L. Risinger, Lin Du
    Natural Product Reports.2020; 37(5): 634.     CrossRef
  • Improvement of Paclitaxel-Associated Adverse Reactions (ADRs) via the Use of Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis


    Pi-Ling Chou, Ya-Ping Huang, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kun-Ming Rau, Yi-Ping Fang
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 1731.     CrossRef
  • Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval
    Duhyeong Hwang, Jacob D. Ramsey, Alexander V. Kabanov
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2020; 156: 80.     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticles in precision medicine for ovarian cancer: From chemotherapy to immunotherapy
    Yuan Li, Yan Gao, Xi Zhang, Hongyan Guo, Huile Gao
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2020; 591: 119986.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis of PCL–PEG–PCL Triblock Copolymer via Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization and Its Application as an Injectable Hydrogel—An Interdisciplinary Learning Trial
    Kaiting Wu, Lin Yu, Jiandong Ding
    Journal of Chemical Education.2020; 97(11): 4158.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical-Based Nanomedicine for Advanced Cancer Theranostics: Perspectives on Clinical Trials to Clinical Use


    Madhusmita Dhupal, Devasish Chowdhury
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 9125.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis and anti-cancer evaluation of folic acid-peptide- paclitaxel conjugates for addressing drug resistance
    Yuxuan Dai, Xingguang Cai, Xinzhou Bi, Chunxia Liu, Na Yue, Ying Zhu, Jiaqi Zhou, Mian Fu, Wenlong Huang, Hai Qian
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2019; 171: 104.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Genexol-PM and Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bhumsuk Keam, Keun-Wook Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Keun-Yong Eom, Suzy Kim, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Seong Keun Kwon, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung, Ji-Won Kim, Dae Seog Heo
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • Polymeric Hybrid Nanomicelles for Cancer Theranostics: An Efficient and Precise Anticancer Strategy for the Codelivery of Doxorubicin/miR-34a and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Xiaoxue Xie, Yu Chen, Zhongyuan Chen, Yi Feng, Jing Wang, Tingting Li, Shun Li, Xiang Qin, Chunhui Wu, Chuan Zheng, Jie Zhu, Fengming You, Yiyao Liu, Hong Yang
    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2019; 11(47): 43865.     CrossRef
  • Micellar paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with tumors of the female reproductive system
    A. G. Kedrova, S. E. Krasilnikov, D. A. Astakhov, V. V. Kosyy
    Tumors of female reproductive system.2019; 15(3): 37.     CrossRef
  • Improving Drug Delivery of Micellar Paclitaxel against Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer by Coloading Itraconazole as a Micelle Stabilizer and a Tumor Vascular Manipulator
    Ling Zhang, Zhengsheng Liu, Chao Kong, Chun Liu, Kuan Yang, Huijun Chen, Jinfeng Huang, Feng Qian
    Small.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13,574 View
  • 360 Download
  • 59 Web of Science
  • 56 Crossref
Close layer
Long Non-coding RNA HOXA11 Antisense Promotes Cell Proliferation and Invasion and Predicts Patient Prognosis in Serous Ovarian Cancer
Ga Won Yim, Hee Jung Kim, Lee Kyung Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Sunghoon Kim, Eun Ji Nam, Young Tae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):656-668.   Published online October 11, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.263
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The biological function of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is only partially understood; therefore, in this study, we investigated the expression of the novel HOXA11 antisense (HOXA11as) lncRNA and its oncogenic role in serous ovarian cancer (SOC).
Materials and Methods
HOXA11as expression was examined in 129 SOC tissue samples by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Clinicopathological factors and patient survival were compared between the high (n=27) and low HOXA11as expression group (n=102). To investigate the role of HOXA11as in cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, HOXA11as expression in ovarian cancer cells was knocked down using RNA interference.
Results
HOXA11as expression in cancer tissue was 77-fold higher than that of noncancerous tissue (p < 0.05). Higher HOXA11as expression was significantly correlated with histological grade (p=0.017) and preoperative cancer antigen 125 (p=0.048). HOXA11as overexpression in SOC cells led to increased cell proliferation, invasion, and migration. Moreover, HOXA11as was associated with the expression of genes involved in cell invasion, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), including vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), B-catenin, E-cadherin, Snail, Twist, and vimentin. Multivariate analysis revealed that HOXA11as was a prognostic factor of progressive disease and mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.730; p=0.043 and HR, 2.170; p=0.033, respectively). Progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients with high HOXA11as expression.
Conclusion
These findings highlight the clinical significance of HOXA11as to predicting the prognosis of SOC patients and suggest its potential in promoting tumor aggressiveness via regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), MMP-9, and EMT-related mechanisms.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Role of EMT-Related lncRNAs in Ovarian Cancer
    Dimitra Ioanna Lampropoulou, Marios Papadimitriou, Christos Papadimitriou, Dimitrios Filippou, Georgia Kourlaba, Gerasimos Aravantinos, Maria Gazouli
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(12): 10079.     CrossRef
  • LncRNAs and the Angiogenic Switch in Cancer: Clinical Significance and Therapeutic Opportunities
    Peace Mabeta, Rodney Hull, Zodwa Dlamini
    Genes.2022; 13(1): 152.     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNA HOXA11-AS knockout inhibits proliferation and overcomes drug resistance in ovarian cancer
    Yuwei Chen, Zhaolei Cui, Qiaoling Wu, Huihui Wang, Hongmei Xia, Yang Sun
    Bioengineered.2022; 13(5): 13893.     CrossRef
  • The role of altered long noncoding RNAs in overall survival of ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elahe Seyed Hosseini, Marziyeh Alizadeh Zarei, Hamed Haddad Kashani, Alireza Milajerdi, Zahra Zare Dehghanani, Hassan Hassani Bafrani, Hossein Nikzad
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2021; 219: 153363.     CrossRef
  • Non-Coding RNAs as Biomarkers of Tumor Progression and Metastatic Spread in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Karolina Seborova, Radka Vaclavikova, Lukas Rob, Pavel Soucek, Pavel Vodicka
    Cancers.2021; 13(8): 1839.     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNAs: A view to kill ovarian cancer
    Alexey V. Zamaraev, Pavel I. Volik, Gennady T. Sukhikh, Gelina S. Kopeina, Boris Zhivotovsky
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.2021; 1876(1): 188584.     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNA CASC15 favors tumorigenesis and development of ovarian cancer via sponging miR-542-3p
    Qiang LI, Wenjing LIU, Sumei LI, Su ZHANG
    Panminerva Medica.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNAs in ovarian cancer: expression profile and functional spectrum
    Selin Oncul, Paola Amero, Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo, George A. Calin, Anil K. Sood, Gabriel Lopez-Berestein
    RNA Biology.2020; 17(11): 1523.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive review of the role of long non-coding RNAs in organs with an endocrine function
    Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard, Mohammadhosein Esmaeili, Hamed Shoorei, Mohammad Taheri
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2020; 125: 110027.     CrossRef
  • Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes ovarian cancer cell migration and cisplatin resistance via regulating epithelial mesenchymal transition
    Lin Deng, Ding-qing Feng, Bin Ling
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2020; 21(4): 315.     CrossRef
  • Long Noncoding RNA E2F4as Promotes Progression and Predicts Patient Prognosis in Human Ovarian Cancer
    Sun-Ae Park, Lee Kyung Kim, Young Tae Kim, Tae-Hwe Heo, Hee Jung Kim
    Cancers.2020; 12(12): 3626.     CrossRef
  • lncRNA HOXA11-AS Promotes Proliferation and Migration via Sponging miR-155 in Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Jianing Xu, Qiyu Bo, Xiang Zhang, Dapeng Lei, Jue Wang, Xinliang Pan
    Oncology Research Featuring Preclinical and Clinical Cancer Therapeutics.2020; 28(3): 311.     CrossRef
  • LncRNAs in ovarian cancer
    Jin-yan Wang, Ai-qing Lu, Li-juan Chen
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2019; 490: 17.     CrossRef
  • Up-regulation of long intergenic noncoding RNA 01296 in ovarian cancer impacts invasion, apoptosis and cell cycle distribution via regulating EMT
    Hui Xu, Jing-Fang Zheng, Cong-Zhe Hou, Yue Li, Pei-Shu Liu
    Cellular Signalling.2019; 62: 109341.     CrossRef
  • A novel risk score system for assessment of ovarian cancer based on co-expression network analysis and expression level of five lncRNAs
    Qian Zhao, Conghong Fan
    BMC Medical Genetics.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNA HOTTIP enhances IL-6 expression to potentiate immune escape of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the expression of PD-L1 in neutrophils
    Anquan Shang, Weiwei Wang, Chenzheng Gu, Chen Chen, Bingjie Zeng, Yibao Yang, Ping Ji, Junjun Sun, Junlu Wu, Wenying Lu, Zujun Sun, Dong Li
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • LINC01210 accelerates proliferation, invasion and migration in ovarian cancer through epigenetically downregulating KLF4
    Chu Zhang, Jie Liu, Yang Zhang, Chengyan Luo, Tong Zhu, Rongrong Zhang, Ruiqin Yao
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2019; 119: 109431.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of long noncoding RNA HOXA11-AS expression in human solid tumors: a meta-analysis
    Shidai Mu, Lisha Ai, Fengjuan Fan, Chunyan Sun, Yu Hu
    Cancer Cell International.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNAs in ovarian cancer
    Lei Zhan, Jun Li, Bing Wei
    Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • HOXA11 antisense long noncoding RNA (HOXA11‐AS): A promising lncRNA in human cancers
    Cheng‐Wei Lu, Dan‐Dan Zhou, Tian Xie, Ji‐Long Hao, Om Prakash Pant, Cheng‐Bo Lu, Xiu‐Fen Liu
    Cancer Medicine.2018; 7(8): 3792.     CrossRef
  • Long noncoding RNA LINC00152 promotes cell proliferation through competitively binding endogenous miR‐125b with MCL‐1 by regulating mitochondrial apoptosis pathways in ovarian cancer
    Puxiang Chen, Xiaolin Fang, Bing Xia, Yan Zhao, Qiaoyan Li, Xiaoying Wu
    Cancer Medicine.2018; 7(9): 4530.     CrossRef
  • Altered long noncoding RNAs and survival outcomes in ovarian cancer
    Li Ning, Ying-chao Hu, Shu Wang, Jing-he Lang
    Medicine.2018; 97(32): e11481.     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNAs as emerging regulators of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in gynecologic cancers
    Xiaojing Lin, Junjun Qiu, Keqin Hua
    BioScience Trends.2018; 12(4): 342.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: Systematic analyses reveal long non-coding RNA (PTAF)-mediated promotion of EMT and invasion-metastasis in serous ovarian cancer
    Haihai Liang, Xiaoguang Zhao, Chengyu Wang, Jian Sun, Yingzhun Chen, Guoyuan Wang, Lei Fang, Rui Yang, Mengxue Yu, Yunyan Gu, Hongli Shan
    Molecular Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • LncRNAs KB‑1836B5, LINC00566 and FAM27L are associated with the survival time of patients with ovarian cancer
    Huijian Li, Mi Gong, Min Zhao, Xinru Wang, Wenjun Cheng, Yankai Xia
    Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • ‘Lnc’‐ing Wnt in female reproductive cancers: therapeutic potential of long non‐coding RNAs in Wnt signalling
    Mei S Ong, Wanpei Cai, Yi Yuan, Hin C Leong, Tuan Z Tan, Asad Mohammad, Ming L You, Frank Arfuso, Boon C Goh, Sudha Warrier, Gautam Sethi, Nicholas S Tolwinski, Peter E Lobie, Celestial T Yap, Shing C Hooi, Ruby Y Huang, Alan P Kumar
    British Journal of Pharmacology.2017; 174(24): 4684.     CrossRef
  • Long non-coding RNA HOXA11-AS in human cancer: A meta-analysis
    Na Li, Meilan Yang, Ke Shi, Wei Li
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2017; 474: 165.     CrossRef
  • Dysregulated expression of homeobox family genes may influence survival outcomes of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas
    Kyung Jin Eoh, Hee Jung Kim, Jung-Yun Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(41): 70579.     CrossRef
  • 11,921 View
  • 393 Download
  • 35 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref
Close layer
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of BRCA1/2 Pathologic Mutation, Variants of Unknown Significance, or Wild Type Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients
Kyung Jin Eoh, Hyung Seok Park, Ji Soo Park, Seung-Tae Lee, Jeongwoo Han, Jung-Yun Lee, Sang Wun Kim, Sunghoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):408-415.   Published online July 27, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.135
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients according to BRCA1/2 mutation status (mutation, variant of uncertain significance [VUS], or wild type).
Materials and Methods
We analyzed 116 patients whose BRCA1/2 genetic test results were available for mutation type and clinical features, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate. These characteristics were compared according to BRCA1/2 mutation status.
Results
Thirty-seven (37/116, 31.9%) BRCA1/2 mutations were identified (BRCA1, 30; BRCA2, 7). Mutation of c.3627_3628insA (p.Leu1209_Glu1210?fs) in BRCA1 was observed in five patients (5/37, 13.5%). Twenty-five patients had BRCA1/2 VUSs (25/116, 21.6%). Personal histories of breast cancer were observed in 48.6% of patients with BRCA1/2 mutation (18/37), 16.0% of patients with BRCA1/2 VUS (4/25), and 7.4% of patients with BRCA wild type (4/54) (p < 0.001). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutation showed longer OS than those with BRCA1/2 wild type (p=0.005). No significant differences were detected in PFS, OS, or response rates between patients with BRCA1/2 VUS and BRCA1/2 mutation (p=0.772, p=0.459, and p=0.898, respectively).
Conclusion
Patientswith BRCA1/2 mutation had longer OS than thosewith BRCA1/2wild type. Patients with BRCA1/2 mutation and BRCA1/2 VUS displayed similar prognoses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of molecular testing on the surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo, Christophe Taoum, Michel Fabbro, Stanislas Quesada, Philippe Rouanet, Isabelle Ray-Coquard
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 202: 104469.     CrossRef
  • The expression and mutation of BRCA1/2 genes in ovarian cancer: a global systematic study
    Dinh-Toi Chu, Mai Vu Ngoc Suong, Hue Vu Thi, Thuy-Duong Vu, Manh-Hung Nguyen, Vijai Singh
    Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics.2023; 23(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes in patients with BRCA mutated, variant of unknown significance, and wild type ovarian cancer treated with PARP inhibitors
    Lucia Musacchio, Serena Boccia, Claudia Marchetti, Angelo Minucci, Floriana Camarda, Chiara Cassani, Jole Ventriglia, Vanda Salutari, Viola Ghizzoni, Elena Giudice, Maria resa Te Perri, Maria Vittoria Carbone, Caterina Ricci, Sandro Pignata, Anna Fagotti,
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2023; 33(6): 922.     CrossRef
  • Modeling human cancer predisposition syndromes using CRISPR/Cas9 in human cell line models
    Garrett M. Draper, Daniel J. Panken, David A. Largaespada
    Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer.2023; 62(9): 493.     CrossRef
  • Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes and Loss of Heterozygosity Status in Advanced-Stage Breast Carcinoma
    Brooke B. Bartow, Gene P. Siegal, Ceren Yalniz, Ahmed M. Elkhanany, Lei Huo, Qingqing Ding, Aysegul A. Sahin, Hua Guo, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Shuko Harada, Xiao Huang
    Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2524.     CrossRef
  • Factors predictingBRCA1/2pathogenic variants in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Giovanni Innella, Lea Godino, Giulia Erini, Antonio De Leo, Donatella Santini, Anna Myriam Perrone, Pierandrea De Iaco, Claudio Zamagni, Daniela Turchetti
    Journal of Clinical Pathology.2023; 76(8): 510.     CrossRef
  • Association of BRCA1/2 mutations with prognosis and surgical cytoreduction outcomes in ovarian cancer patients: An updated meta‐analysis
    Yazhuo Wang, Na Li, Yanan Ren, Jing Zhao
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2022; 48(9): 2270.     CrossRef
  • Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with BRCAness Phenotype: A Treatment Challenge
    Cláudia Caeiro, Inês Leão, Inês Oliveira, Isabel Sousa, Teresa André
    Advances in Therapy.2022; 39(11): 5289.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Highlighting the Landscape of Germline Alterations in Ovarian Cancer Patients
    Giorgia Gurioli, Gianluca Tedaldi, Alberto Farolfi, Elisabetta Petracci, Claudia Casanova, Giuseppe Comerci, Rita Danesi, Valentina Arcangeli, Mila Ravegnani, Daniele Calistri, Valentina Zampiga, Ilaria Cangini, Eugenio Fonzi, Alessandra Virga, Davide Tas
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15789.     CrossRef
  • Implementation of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
    Shira Peleg Hasson, Dov Hershkovitz, Lyri Adar, Miriam Brezis, Eliya Shachar, Rona Aks, Lee Galmor, Yuval Raviv, Shira Ben Neriah, Ofer Merimsky, Edmond Sabo, Ido Wolf, Tamar Safra
    Cancers.2022; 15(1): 218.     CrossRef
  • Current update on malignant epithelial ovarian tumors
    Sherif B. Elsherif, Priya R. Bhosale, Chandana Lall, Christine O. Menias, Malak Itani, Kristina A. Butler, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
    Abdominal Radiology.2021; 46(6): 2264.     CrossRef
  • Mutation landscape of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer
    Kyung Jin Eoh, Hye Min Kim, Jung-Yun Lee, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of Germline Variants in Human DNA Damage Repair Genes and Response to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Haijie Hu, Yayun Zhu, Ning Pu, Richard A. Burkhart, William Burns, Daniel Laheru, Lei Zheng, Jin He, Michael G. Goggins, Jun Yu
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2020; 231(5): 527.     CrossRef
  • Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants found in ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers
    Hyeong In Ha, Jin-Sun Ryu, Hyoeun Shim, Sun-Young Kong, Myong Cheol Lim
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Selecting variants of unknown significance through network-based gene-association significantly improves risk prediction for disease-control cohorts
    Anastasis Oulas, George Minadakis, Margarita Zachariou, George M. Spyrou
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of BRCA mutational status on survival outcome in advanced-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer
    Se Ik Kim, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae-Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong-Sang Song
    Journal of Ovarian Research.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of variants of unknown significances in BRCA genes
    Min Chul Choi
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • DNA damage response and repair in ovarian cancer: Potential targets for therapeutic strategies
    Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Caspian Ostadian, Amir Ata Saei, Ainaz Mihanfar, Saber Ghazizadeh Darband, Shirin Sadighparvar, Mojtaba Kaviani, Hossein Samadi Kafil, Bahman Yousefi, Maryam Majidinia
    DNA Repair.2019; 80: 59.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of BRCA1/2 Mutation in Korean Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study and Literature Review
    Byung Su Kwon, Jung Mi Byun, Hyun Joo Lee, Dae Hoon Jeong, Tae Hwa Lee, Kyung-Hwa Shin, Dong Soo Suh, Ki Hyung Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 941.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and oncologic outcomes of BRCA1/2 mutation and variant of unknown significance in epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients in Korea
    Jun Hyeong Seo, Soo Young Jeong, Myeong Seon Kim, Jun Hyeok Kang, E Sun Paik, Yoo-Young Lee, Tae-Joong Kim, Jeong-Won Lee, Byoung-Gie Kim, Duk-Soo Bae, Chel Hun Choi
    Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2019; 62(6): 411.     CrossRef
  • Unclassified Variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Korean Patients With Ovarian Cancer
    Min Chul Choi, Ja-Hyun Jang, Sang Geun Jung, Hyun Park, Won Duk Joo, Seung Hun Song, Chan Lee, Je Ho Lee
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2018; 28(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of germline BRCA mutations among women with carcinoma of the peritoneum or fallopian tube
    Min Chul Choi, Jin-Sik Bae, Sang Geun Jung, Hyun Park, Won Duk Joo, Seung Hun Song, Chan Lee, Ji-Ho Kim, Ki-Chan Lee, Sunghoon Lee, Je Ho Lee
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Detection of Germline Mutations in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using Multi-gene Panels: Beyond BRCA1/2
    Kyung Jin Eoh, Ji Eun Kim, Hyung Seok Park, Seung-Tae Lee, Ji Soo Park, Jung Woo Han, Jung-Yun Lee, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(3): 917.     CrossRef
  • ATL
    Xinxin Zhu, Ling Zhao, Jinghe Lang
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2018; 28(8): 1514.     CrossRef
  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients from China: ethnic‐related mutations in BRCA1 associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer
    Tingyan Shi, Pan Wang, Caixia Xie, Sheng Yin, Di Shi, Congchong Wei, Wenbin Tang, Rong Jiang, Xi Cheng, Qingyi Wei, Qing Wang, Rongyu Zang
    International Journal of Cancer.2017; 140(9): 2051.     CrossRef
  • Role and clinical application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ovarian cancer
    Myong Cheol Lim, Leslie M. Randall
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12,778 View
  • 448 Download
  • 28 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
Current Trends of Lung Cancer Surgery and Demographic and Social Factors Related to Changes in the Trends of Lung Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of the National Database from 2010 to 2014
Samina Park, In Kyu Park, Eung Re Kim, Yoohwa Hwang, Hyun Joo Lee, Chang Hyun Kang, Young Tae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(2):330-337.   Published online July 18, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.196
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We investigated current trends in lung cancer surgery and identified demographic and social factors related to changes in these trends.
Materials and Methods
We estimated the incidence of lung cancer surgery using a procedure code-based approach provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (http://opendata.hira.or.kr). The population data were obtained every year from 2010 to 2014 from the Korean Statistical Information Service (http://kosis.kr/). The annual percent change (APC) and statistical significance were calculated using the Joinpoint software.
Results
From January 2010 to December 2014, 25,687 patients underwent 25,921 lung cancer surgeries, which increased by 45.1% from 2010 to 2014. The crude incidence rate of lung cancer surgery in each year increased significantly (APC, 9.5; p < 0.05). The male-to-female ratio decreased from 2.1 to 1.6 (APC, −6.3; p < 0.05). The incidence increased in the age group of ≥ 70 years for both sexes (male: APC, 3.7; p < 0.05; female: APC, 5.96; p < 0.05). Furthermore, the proportion of female patients aged ≥ 65 years increased (APC, 7.2; p < 0.05), while that of male patients aged < 65 years decreased (APC, −3.9; p < 0.05). The proportions of segmentectomies (APC, 17.8; p < 0.05) and lobectomies (APC, 7.5; p < 0.05) increased, while the proportion of pneumonectomies decreased (APC, −6.3; p < 0.05). Finally, the proportion of patients undergoing surgery in Seoul increased (APC, 1.1; p < 0.05), while the proportion in other areas decreased (APC, −1.5; p < 0.05).
Conclusion
An increase in the use of lung cancer surgery in elderly patients and female patients, and a decrease in the proportion of patients requiring extensive pulmonary resection were identified. Furthermore, centralization of lung cancer surgery was noted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical characteristics and course of pulmonary artery stump thrombosis following lung cancer surgery: A retrospective study from tertiary care hospital
    Ji-Eun Park, Seung-Ick Cha, Deok Heon Lee, Eung Bae Lee, Sun Ha Choi, Yong Hoon Lee, Hyewon Seo, Seung-Soo Yoo, Shin-Yup Lee, Jaehee Lee, Chang-Ho Kim, Jae-Yong Park
    Medicine.2024; 103(2): e36879.     CrossRef
  • Lung cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment: The radiologist's perspective
    Bingqing Long, Zeng Xiong, Manzo Habou
    Meta-Radiology.2024; 2(1): 100066.     CrossRef
  • Inter-prefectural and urban–rural regional disparities in lung cancer surgery: a Japanese nationwide population-based cohort study from 2017 to 2019
    Masamitsu Kido, Satoru Okada, Naoyuki Takashima, Luying Yan, Atsuki Uchibori, Koji Sensaki, Tetsuo Kido, Masayoshi Inoue
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(12): 1428.     CrossRef
  • Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a matched-pair study
    Seyer Safi, Maximilian Robert Gysan, Dorothea Weber, Rouven Behnisch, Thomas Muley, Michael Allgäuer, Hauke Winter, Hans Hoffmann, Martin Eichhorn
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Screening for Lung Cancer, Overdiagnosis, and Healthcare Utilization: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
    So Yeon Kim, Gerard A. Silvestri, Yeon Wook Kim, Roger Y. Kim, Sang-Won Um, Yunjoo Im, Jung Hye Hwang, Seung Ho Choi, Jung Seop Eom, Kang Mo Gu, Yong-Soo Kwon, Shin Yup Lee, Hyun Woo Lee, Dong Won Park, Yeonjeong Heo, Seung Hun Jang, Kwang Yong Choi, Yeol
    Journal of Thoracic Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced surgical technologies for lung cancer treatment: Current status and perspectives
    Hongfei Cai, Yonghui Wang, Da Qin, Youbin Cui, Hongbo Zhang
    Engineered Regeneration.2023; 4(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • Domestic medical travel from non-Seoul regions to Seoul for initial breast cancer treatment: a nationwide cohort study
    Jae Ho Jeong, Jinhong Jung, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Beom-Seok Ko, Byung Ho Son, Kyung Hae Jung, Il Yong Chung
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge root extract induces apoptosis of murine lung carcinoma cells in vitro
    Minjeong Kwon, Jongbeom Chae, Ju-Ock Nam
    Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disparities in lung cancer short- and long-term outcomes after surgery: Analysis from the national cancer database
    Mark R. Korst, Aman M. Patel, Daniel J. Garcia, Akash R. Patel, Hassaam S. Choudhry, Joseph G. Santitoro, Vincent Yeung, Joshua A. Kra
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2023; 37: 100777.     CrossRef
  • Trend of lung cancer surgery, hospital selection, and survival between 2005 and 2016 in South Korea
    Dohun Kim, Gil‐Won Kang, Hoyeon Jang, Jun Yeun Cho, Bumhee Yang, Hee Chul Yang, Jinwook Hwang
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(2): 210.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Lung Cancer and Surgery Based on Studies Using a Nationwide Database
    Dohun Kim, Jung-Won Lee
    Journal of Chest Surgery.2022; 55(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of textbook outcome after lobectomy for early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer in a Korean institution: A retrospective study
    Woo Sik Yu, Jaeyong Shin, Jung A Son, Joonho Jung, Seokjin Haam
    Thoracic Cancer.2022; 13(8): 1211.     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary vein stump thrombosis after lung resection for lung cancer: clinical features and outcome
    Ji-Eun Park, Seung-Ick Cha, Deok Heon Lee, Eung Bae Lee, Sun Ha Choi, Yong Hoon Lee, Hyewon Seo, Seung-Soo Yoo, Shin-Yup Lee, Jaehee Lee, Chang-Ho Kim, Jae-Yong Park
    Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis.2022; 33(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Healthcare vulnerability disparities in pancreatic cancer treatment and mortality using the Korean National Sample Cohort: a retrospective cohort study
    Sung Hoon Jeong, Hyeon Ji Lee, Choa Yun, Il Yun, Yun Hwa Jung, Soo Young Kim, Hee Seung Lee, Sung-In Jang
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trends in the traditional cardiothoracic surgery resident operative experience for cardiac cases: An analysis of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs
    Aakash M. Shah, Emaad Siddiqui, Sari D. Holmes, Alexis Okoh, Mohamed Abdullah, Kristopher Deatrick, Sunjay Kaushal, Justin Sambol
    The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2021; 161(3): 1064.     CrossRef
  • Does Delaying Time in Cancer Treatment Affect Mortality? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Korean Lung and Gastric Cancer Patients
    Kyu-Tae Han, Woorim Kim, Seungju Kim
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(7): 3462.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: right drugs, right patient, right time?
    Elizabeth Ahern, Ben J Solomon, Rina Hui, Nick Pavlakis, Ken O'Byrne, Brett G M Hughes
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.2021; 9(6): e002248.     CrossRef
  • Do Patients Residing in Provincial Areas Transport and Spend More on Cancer Treatment in Korea?
    Woorim Kim, Kyu-Tae Han, Seungju Kim
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(17): 9247.     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Korean National Health Insurance Database
    Woo Sik Yu, Mi Kyung Bae, Jung Kyu Choi, Young Ki Hong, In Kyu Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(4): 1104.     CrossRef
  • Rare location and drainage pattern of right pulmonary veins and aberrant right upper lobe bronchial branch: A case report
    Fu-Qiang Wang, Rui Zhang, Han-Lu Zhang, Yun-Hai Mo, Yu Zheng, Guang-Hao Qiu, Yun Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(32): 9954.     CrossRef
  • Comment on: ‘Hospital lung surgery volume and patient outcomes’
    Rob Stirling, Michael Stenger, John Zalcberg
    Lung Cancer.2020; 142: 138.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes after aortic aneurysm repair in patients with history of cancer: a nationwide dataset analysis
    Sanghyun Ahn, Jin-Young Min, Hyunyoung G. Kim, Hyejin Mo, Seung-Kee Min, Sangil Min, Jongwon Ha, Kyoung-Bok Min
    BMC Surgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Time trends and predictors of survival in surgically resected early‐stage non–small cell lung cancer patients
    Jitesh B. Shewale, Erin M. Corsini, Arlene M. Correa, Eric L. Brown, Luis G. Leon‐Novelo, Alan G. Nyitray, Mara B. Antonoff, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Reza J. Mehran, David C. Rice, Jack Roth, Garrett L. Walsh, Ara A. Vaporciyan, Stephen G. Swisher, Boris Sepe
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 122(3): 495.     CrossRef
  • Patterns of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) of the lung and risk of PTNB-related severe pneumothorax: A nationwide population-based study
    Bo Ram Yang, Mi-Sook Kim, Chang Min Park, Soon Ho Yoon, Kum Ju Chae, Joongyub Lee, James West
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(7): e0235599.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer
    Haley Hoy, Thuy Lynch, Monica Beck
    Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America.2019; 31(3): 303.     CrossRef
  • Higher Age Puts Lung Cancer Patients at Risk for Not Receiving Anti-cancer Treatment
    Won-Il Choi, Jiah Choi, Mi-Ae Kim, Gyumin Lee, Jihyeon Jeong, Choong Won Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1241.     CrossRef
  • Recent Trends in Demographics, Surgery, and Prognosis of Patients with Surgically Resected Lung Cancer in a Single Institution from Korea
    Jae Kwang Yun, Han Pil Lee, Geun Dong Lee, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Dong Kwan Kim, Seung-Il Park, Sehoon Choi
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pharmacodynamics of Pre-Operative PD1 checkpoint blockade and receptor activator of NFkB ligand (RANKL) inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase 1B/2, translational trial (POPCORN)
    Elizabeth Ahern, Annette Cubitt, Emma Ballard, Michele W. L. Teng, William C. Dougall, Mark J. Smyth, David Godbolt, Rishendran Naidoo, Amanda Goldrick, Brett G. M. Hughes
    Trials.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Progress in the Management of Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in 2017
    Jessica S. Donington, Young Tae Kim, Betty Tong, Andre L. Moreira, Jamie Bessich, Kathleen D. Weiss, Yolonda L. Colson, Dennis Wigle, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon, Jeffrey Zweig, Heather Wakelee, Justin Blasberg, Megan Daly, Leah Backhus, Paul Van Schil
    Journal of Thoracic Oncology.2018; 13(6): 767.     CrossRef
  • 10,881 View
  • 290 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 29 Crossref
Close layer
A New Isolated Mediastinal Lymph Node or Small Pulmonary Nodule Arising during Breast Cancer Surveillance Following Curative Surgery: Clinical Factors That Differentiate Malignant from Benign Lesions
Tae-Yong Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Sae-Won Han, Do-Youn Oh, Seock-Ah Im, Tae-You Kim, Wonshik Han, Kyubo Kim, Eui Kyu Chie, In-Ae Park, Young Tae Kim, Dong-Young Noh, Sung Whan Ha, Yung-Jue Bang
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(3):280-287.   Published online July 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.3.280
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
A newly isolated mediastinal lymph node (LN) or a small pulmonary nodule, which appears during breast cancer surveillance, may pose a diagnostic dilemma with regard to malignancy. We conducted this study to determine which clinical factors were useful for the differentiation of malignant lesions from benign lesions under these circumstances. Materials and Methods We enrolled breast cancer patients who were presented with a new isolated mediastinal LN or small pulmonary nodule that arose during surveillance, and whose lesions were pathologically confirmed. Tissue diagnosis was made by mediastinoscopy, video-assisted thoracic surgery or thoracotomy. Results A total of 43 patients were enrolled (mediastinal LN, 13 patients; pulmonary nodule, 30 patients). Eighteen patients (41.9%) were pathologically confirmed to have a benign lesion (benign group), and 25 patients (58.1%) were confirmed to have malignant lesion (malignant group). Between the two groups, the initial tumor size (p=0.096) and N stage (p=0.749) were similar. Hormone receptor negativity was more prevalent in the malignant group (59.1% vs. 40.9%, p=0.048). The mean lesion size was larger in the malignant group than in the benign group (20.8 mm vs. 14.4 mm, p=0.024). Metastatic lesions had a significantly higher value of maximal standardized uptake (mSUV) than that of benign lesions (6.4 vs. 3.4, p=0.021). Conclusion Hormone receptor status, lesion size, and mSUV on positron emission tomography are helpful in the differentiation of malignant lesions from benign lesions in breast cancer patients who were presented with a new isolated mediastinal LN or small pulmonary nodule during surveillance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Unusual metastases of breast cancer: a single-center retrospective study
    Pınar ÖZDEMİR AKDUR, Nazan ÇİLEDAĞ
    The European Research Journal.2023; 9(6): 1444.     CrossRef
  • 18Fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography/computed tomography features of suspected solitary pulmonary lesions in breast cancer patients following previous curative treatment
    Lei Zhu, Haiman Bian, Lieming Yang, Jianjing Liu, Wei Chen, Xiaofeng Li, Jian Wang, Xiuyu Song, Dong Dai, Zhaoxiang Ye, Wengui Xu, Xiaozhou Yu
    Thoracic Cancer.2019; 10(5): 1086.     CrossRef
  • 12,959 View
  • 60 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Synergistic Effect of COX-2 Inhibitor on Paclitaxel-Induced Apoptosis in the Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Line OVCAR-3
Hee Jung Kim, Ga Won Yim, Eun Ji Nam, Young Tae Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46(1):81-92.   Published online January 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.46.1.81
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
Celecoxib, a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, regulates apoptosis of several types of human cancer cells. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether celecoxib in combination with paclitaxel modulates apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells, and to identify the signal pathway by which celecoxib mediates apoptosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
OVCAR-3 cells were exposed to paclitaxel (20 microM) in the absence or presence of celecoxib (10 microM). Cell viability was evaluated using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. Apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin-V/7-aminoactinomycin D staining and a cellular DNA fragmentation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Caspase-3, -9, and cleavage of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) were determined by western blotting. Expression of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Akt activation were assessed using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and western blotting.
RESULTS
Celecoxib enhanced paclitaxel-induced growth inhibition of OVCAR-3 cells. Celecoxib significantly increased paclitaxel-induced apoptosis of OVCAR-3 cells. Pretreatment with celecoxib also increased activation of caspase-9, -3 and cleaved PARP following paclitaxel-treatment. Exposure of OVCAR-3 cells to celecoxib in combination with paclitaxel resulted in downregulation of NF-kappaB activation and VEGF expression. Furthermore, combining celecoxib and paclitaxel inhibited phosphorylation of Akt.
CONCLUSION
OVCAR-3 cells were sensitized to paclitaxel-induced apoptosis by celecoxib through downregulation of NF-kappaB and Akt activation, suggesting that celecoxib may work synergistically with paclitaxel to inhibit different targets and ultimately produce anticancer effects. Combining celecoxib with paclitaxel may prove beneficial in the clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Concomitant effects of paclitaxel and celecoxib on genes involved in apoptosis of triple-negative metastatic breast cancer cells
    Mohaddeseh Hedayat, Mohammad Rafi Khezri, Reza Jafari, Hassan Malekinejad, Naime Majidi Zolbanin
    Medical Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hyperforin-mediated anticancer mechanisms in MDA-MB-231 cell line: insights into apoptotic mediator modulation and caspase activation
    Muttiah Barathan, Ahmad Khusairy Zulpa, Kumutha Malar Vellasamy, Zaridatul Aini Ibrahim, See Mee Hoong, Vanitha Mariappan, Gopinath Venkatraman, Jamuna Vadivelu
    Journal of Taibah University for Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Celecoxib Reverse Invasion and Metastasis of Gastric Cancer through Lnc_AC006548.28-miR-223-LAMC2 Pathway
    Guohua Jin, Jianguang Zhang, Tingting Cao, He Zhu, Yang Shi, Kapil Sharma
    Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • New Visions on Natural Products and Cancer Therapy: Autophagy and Related Regulatory Pathways
    Alma Martelli, Marzieh Omrani, Maryam Zarghooni, Valentina Citi, Simone Brogi, Vincenzo Calderone, Antoni Sureda, Shahrokh Lorzadeh, Simone C. da Silva Rosa, Beniamin Oscar Grabarek, Rafał Staszkiewicz, Marek J. Los, Seyed Fazel Nabavi, Seyed Mohammad Nab
    Cancers.2022; 14(23): 5839.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-758 Regulates Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma via COX-2
    Gang Dong, Hong Chen, Yan Shi, Chunrong Jiang, Hongtao Yang
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(4): 932.     CrossRef
  • Synergistic effects of green tea extract and paclitaxel in the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell lines
    Mohammad Panji, Vahideh Behmard, Zahra Zare, Monireh Malekpour, Hasan Nejadbiglari, Saeede Yavari, Tina Nayerpour dizaj, Azadeh Safaeian, Ali Bakhshi, Omid Abazari, Mojtaba Abbasi, Parisa Khanicheragh, Maryam Shabanzadeh
    Gene.2021; 787: 145638.     CrossRef
  • Spike-in normalization for single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic global transcriptional activity mediating anticancer drug response
    Xin Wang, Jane Frederick, Hongbin Wang, Sheng Hui, Vadim Backman, Zhe Ji
    NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of Key Genes and Pathways Associated With Paclitaxel Resistance in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Bioinformatics Analysis
    Zhimin Shen, Mingduan Chen, Fei Luo, Hui Xu, Peipei Zhang, Jihong Lin, Mingqiang Kang
    Frontiers in Genetics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cyclooxygenase-2 promotes ovarian cancer cell migration and cisplatin resistance via regulating epithelial mesenchymal transition
    Lin Deng, Ding-qing Feng, Bin Ling
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2020; 21(4): 315.     CrossRef
  • Paclitaxel induces apoptosis through the TAK1–JNK activation pathway
    Di Yu‐Wei, Zhuo‐sheng Li, Shu‐min Xiong, Ge Huang, Yan‐fei Luo, Tie‐ying Huo, Mao‐hua Zhou, You‐wei Zheng
    FEBS Open Bio.2020; 10(8): 1655.     CrossRef
  • Integration of genetic variants and gene network for drug repurposing in colorectal cancer
    Lalu Muhammad Irham, Henry Sung-Ching Wong, Wan-Hsuan Chou, Wirawan Adikusuma, Eko Mugiyanto, Wan-Chen Huang, Wei-Chiao Chang
    Pharmacological Research.2020; 161: 105203.     CrossRef
  • Correlation between the changes of serum COX 2, APE1, VEGF, TGF-β and TSGF levels and prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma before and after treatment
    Qingxi Zhang, Guo Dong, Fuchuan Wang, Wenyuan Ding
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2020; 16(2): 335.     CrossRef
  • Preventative effect of celecoxib in dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced ovarian cancer in rats
    Zhuyan Shao, Qiang Wen, Tao Zhu, Wei Jiang, Yu Kang, Conjian Xu, Shihua Wang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2018; 298(5): 981.     CrossRef
  • Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-1 Inhibitors in Cancer: A Review of Oncology and Medicinal Chemistry Literature
    Alessandra Pannunzio, Mauro Coluccia
    Pharmaceuticals.2018; 11(4): 101.     CrossRef
  • Targeting multidrug-resistant ovarian cancer through estrogen receptor α dependent ATP depletion caused by hyperactivation of the unfolded protein response
    Xiaobin Zheng, Neal Andruska, Michael J. Lambrecht, Sisi He, Amadeo Parissenti, Paul J. Hergenrother, Erik R. Nelson, David J. Shapiro
    Oncotarget.2018; 9(19): 14741.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-381 regulates the occurrence and immune responses of coronary atherosclerosis via cyclooxygenase-2
    Kaiyou Song, Lianting Li, Guiling Sun, Yanjin Wei
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cyclooxygenase-2 mediated synergistic effect of ursolic acid in combination with paclitaxel against human gastric carcinoma
    Xian Xu, Guo-Qin Zhu, Kai Zhang, Yi-Chan Zhou, Xiao-Lin Li, Wei Xu, Hao Zhang, Yun Shao, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Wei-Hao Sun
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(54): 92770.     CrossRef
  • Literature-based discovery of new candidates for drug repurposing
    Hsih-Te Yang, Jiun-Huang Ju, Yue-Ting Wong, Ilya Shmulevich, Jung-Hsien Chiang
    Briefings in Bioinformatics.2016; : bbw030.     CrossRef
  • Synergistic growth inhibitory effect of deracoxib with doxorubicin against a canine mammary tumor cell line, CMT-U27
    Tülay BAKIREL, Fulya Üstün ALKAN, Oya ÜSTÜNER, Suzan ÇINAR, Funda YILDIRIM, Gaye ERTEN, Utku BAKIREL
    Journal of Veterinary Medical Science.2016; 78(4): 657.     CrossRef
  • Aberrant over-expression of COX-1 intersects multiple pro-tumorigenic pathways in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
    Andrew J. Wilson, Oluwole Fadare, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Deok-Soo Son, Qi Liu, Shilin Zhao, Jeanette Saskowski, Md. Jashim Uddin, Cristina Daniel, Brenda Crews, Brian D. Lehmann, Jennifer A. Pietenpol, Marta A. Crispens, Lawrence J. Marnett, Dineo Khabele
    Oncotarget.2015; 6(25): 21353.     CrossRef
  • 13,224 View
  • 120 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
Close layer
Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Microscopic Margin Involvement in the Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus
Sanghyuk Song, Eui Kyu Chie, Hak Jae Kim, Chang-Hyun Kang, Young Tae Kim, Joo Hyun Kim, Charn Il Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45(3):202-209.   Published online September 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.45.3.202
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to assess the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on the outcome of esophageal cancer with microscopically positive resection margin by comparing the results with those of patients with negative resection margin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Medical records of 88 patients treated with macroscopic resection followed by postoperative radiotherapy for stage II or III squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus from June 1984 to March 2008 were reviewed. Twelve patients had received chemotherapy. Patients were classified into two groups based on resection margin status: negative resection margin (group A, n=66) and microscopically positive resection margin (group B, n=22). Median follow-up duration of living patients was 68 months (range, 18 to 115 months). Median total radiation dose of group A and group B was 51.5 Gy (range, 45 to 69 Gy) and 52.1 Gy (range, 45 to 64 Gy), respectively.
RESULTS
Median overall survival and disease-free survival were 15 and 10 months, respectively. The five-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates for group A and group B were 15.9% and 16.4%, 13.5% and 9.1%, and 76.3% and 69.6%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control (p=0.295, p=0.209, and p=0.731, respectively) was observed between group A and group B. Seven patients experienced toxicity of grade 3 or higher.
CONCLUSION
A significant portion of patients with margin involvement reached long term survival after addition of postoperative radiotherapy. These results suggest a potential role of postoperative radiotherapy, especially for patients with margin involvement.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with positive circumferential resection margin
    Reiko Otake, Akihiko Okamura, Kotaro Yamashita, Yu Imamura, Jun Kanamori, Ryotaro Kozuki, Keita Takahashi, Tasuku Toihata, Noriko Yamamoto, Takao Asari, Shinji Mine, Masayuki Watanabe
    Esophagus.2021; 18(2): 288.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Adjuvant Postoperative Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy on Survival After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma
    Andrew T. Wong, Meng Shao, Justin Rineer, Anna Lee, David Schwartz, David Schreiber
    Annals of Surgery.2017; 265(6): 1146.     CrossRef
  • Alpha linolenic acid and oleic acid additively down-regulate malignant potential and positively cross-regulate AMPK/S6 axis in OE19 and OE33 esophageal cancer cells
    Hyun-Seuk Moon, Saime Batirel, Christos S. Mantzoros
    Metabolism.2014; 63(11): 1447.     CrossRef
  • 11,700 View
  • 55 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Close layer
Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 28 Patients, Single Center Experience for 20 Years
Eun Ji Nam, Jae Wook Kim, Dae Woo Lee, Si Young Jang, Jong Wook Hong, Young Tae Kim, Jae Hoon Kim, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40(1):6-10.   Published online March 31, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2008.40.1.6
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the behavior of endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) in relation to their clinical and pathogenic features, and to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed involving 28 patients with histologic-proven ESSs treated at our institution between 1987 and 2006.

Results

The median follow-up was 54.7±63.1 months and the 5-year survival rate was 82.0%. Twenty-two (81.5%) and 5 patients (18.5%) had low- and high-grade disease, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the histologic grades, based on mitotic count, were associated with longer survival (p=0.004). However, among those patients with low-grade tumors, 5/20 patients (25%) had a recurrence and 2/21 patients (9.5%) had distant metastasis during the follow-up period. With the exception of 2 patients, 26 patients with ESSs underwent hysterectomy as primary treatment. Adjuvant treatment after surgery was administered to 14/26 patients (53.8%). Hormone therapy with progesterone, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy did not influence overall survival. However, the postoperative adjuvant therapy group, regardless of the treatment modality, was associated with relatively increased overall survival when compared to the surgery only group (p=0.054).

Conclusions

The preoperative differential diagnosis of ESSs from other benign gynecologic diseases is often difficult. We recommend adjuvant therapy be administered after hysterectomy in patients with ESS to prevent recurrence or distant metastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic surgery on broken points for uterine sarcoma in the early stage decrease prognosis
    Hong Liu, Yi Zhu, Guo-Nan Zhang, Chang Wang, Chao Li, Yu Shi
    Scientific Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term survival of patients with recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma: a multicenter, observational study
    Hiroyuki Yamazaki, Yukiharu Todo, Kenrokuro Mitsube, Hitoshi Hareyama, Chisa Shimada, Hidenori Kato, Katsushige Yamashiro
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2015; 26(3): 214.     CrossRef
  • Management of uterine adenosarcomas with and without sarcomatous overgrowth
    Edward J. Tanner, Thomas Toussaint, Mario M. Leitao, Martee L. Hensley, Robert A. Soslow, Ginger J. Gardner, Elizabeth L. Jewell
    Gynecologic Oncology.2013; 129(1): 140.     CrossRef
  • Uterine Sarcomas: Then and Now
    Shaan H. Shah, Jyothi P. Jagannathan, Katherine Krajewski, Kevin N. O???Regan, Suzanne George, Nikhil H. Ramaiya
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2012; 199(1): 213.     CrossRef
  • Role of radiotherapy treatment of uterine sarcoma
    Sagus Sampath, David K. Gaffney
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2011; 25(6): 761.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of uterine sarcoma
    Joo-Hyun Nam
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2011; 25(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Tumor Morcellation During Surgery on the Outcomes of Patients with Apparently Early Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma of the Uterus
    Jeong-Yeol Park, Dae-Yeon Kim, Jong-Hyeok Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Young-Tak Kim, Joo-Hyun Nam
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2011; 18(12): 3453.     CrossRef
  • 10,835 View
  • 139 Download
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
An Analysis of the Risk Factors and Management of Lymphocele after Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies
Hee Yeon Kim, Jae Wook Kim, Sung Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Jae Hoon Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(6):377-383.   Published online December 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.6.377
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Objectives

The incidence and risk factors of lymphocele development after pelvic lymphadenectomy were evaluated and its management investigated.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was carried out on 264 patients who received a pelvic lymphadenectomy, between March 1999 and February 2003, due to gynecologic cancer. The patients were classified into two groups; the lymphocele (n=50) and non-lymphocele groups (n=214), as confirmed by ultrasonography, CT scan and MRI. Each group was compared by cancer type and stage, BMI, preoperative Hb, use of pre/postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy, number of resected pelvic lymph nodes and the volume of postoperative drainage from a Hemovac® pelvic drain.

Results

Of the 264 patients tested, 15 of 105 cervical cancer (14%), 22 of 115 ovarian cancer (19%) and 11 of 40 endometrial cancer patients (27%), a total of 50 patients (18%), developed lymphoceles. In the lymphocele group (n=50), 13 patients were diagnosed with complicated lymphocele. The BMI and number of resected pelvic lymph nodes were found to be higher in the lymphocele than in the non-lymphocele group (23.94±3.38 vs. 22.52±3.00, p=0.00 and 26.80±14.82 vs. 22.96±10.18, p=0.03, respectively), and showed statistical significance. The occurrence of lymphoceles was lower without postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.01).

Conclusion

Among the 264 patients, a total of 50 patients (18%) developed lymphoceles. The BMI and number of resected lymph nodes were higher in the lymphocele group, and the use of postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher risk of lymphoceles. Thirteen of the 50 patients that developed lymphoceles (n=50) required treatment for lymphocele-related complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Postoperative Morbidity and Factors Predicting the Development of Lymphoceles Following Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study
    Joseph Mathew, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin Desouza, Avanish Saklani
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(1): 165.     CrossRef
  • Intra‐lymphocele microsurgical identification of causative afferent vessels for effective lymphaticovenular anastomosis in lymphocele treatment: A case report
    Kohei Mitsui, Mitsunaga Narushima, Kanako Danno, Ryohei Ishiura, Chihena H. Banda
    Microsurgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Symptomatic Lymphocele After Robot-Assisted Pelvic Lymphadenectomy as Part of the Primary Surgical Treatment for Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Alise de Jong, Ilse G.T. Baeten, Anna Jansen, Jacob P. Hoogendam, Ina M. Jürgenliemk–Schulz, Ronald P. Zweemer, Cornelis G. Gerestein
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(3): 243.     CrossRef
  • Vascular Clips for Preventing Lymphocele and Symptomatic Lymphocele in Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies After Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy
    Luyang Zhao, Xiufeng Xie, Wensheng Fan, Yang Wen, Nina Zhang, Jia Xu, Yuanguang Meng, Chenglei Gu
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(10): 875.     CrossRef
  • Compression Neuropathy Caused by Pelvic Lymphocele after Laparoscopic Surgical Staging
    Dong Jin Chae, Jong Bum Park, Mi Jin Hong, Jungyun Kim, Cho E. Sim, Seung-Eun Kim, Yung Jin Lee
    Journal of Electrodiagnosis and Neuromuscular Diseases.2024; 26(2): 29.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for early-stage cervical cancer
    Shinichi Togami, Nozomi Furuzono, Mika Mizuno, Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2024; 29(11): 1740.     CrossRef
  • Lymphatic embolization for early post-operative lymphatic leakage after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer
    Yoo Sub Shin, Kichang Han, Jongsoo Lee, Hyun Ho Han, Won Sik Jang, Gyoung Min Kim, Ji Eun Heo, Mazyar Zahir
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(9): e0305240.     CrossRef
  • Incomplete lymphatic sealing around the inferior mesenteric artery is a risk factor for chylous ascites in robotic rectal cancer surgery
    Hajime Ushigome, Hiroki Takahashi, Anri Maeda, Akira Kato, Shinnosuke Harata, Kawori Watanabe, Takeshi Yanagita, Takuya Suzuki, Kazuyoshi Shiga, Koshiro Harata, Ryo Ogawa, Yoichi Matsuo, Akira Mitsui, Masahiro Kimura, Shuji Takiguchi
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2023; 16(2): 163.     CrossRef
  • A Prospective Observational Study to Know the Origin of Lymphorrhea in Post-Renal Transplant Patients using Creatine Phosphokinase and Lactate Dehydrogenase
    Eeshansh Khare, Debansu Sarkar, Debojyoti Bhattacharjee, Dilip Kumar Pal
    Indian Journal of Transplantation.2023; 17(2): 215.     CrossRef
  • Lymphatic Complications Following Sentinel Node Biopsy or Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Shinichi Terada, Tomohito Tanaka, Hikaru Murakami, Hiromitsu Tsuchihashi, Akihiko Toji, Atsushi Daimon, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Ruri Nishie, Shoko Ueda, Sousuke Hashida, Natsuko Morita, Hiroshi Maruoka, Hiromi Konishi, Yuhei Kogata, Kohei Taniguchi, Kazumasa K
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(13): 4540.     CrossRef
  • The incidence of perioperative lymphatic complications after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between robotic and laparoscopic approach : a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim
    International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Vacuum-Assisted Suction Drainage as a Successful Treatment Option for Postoperative Symptomatic Lymphoceles
    Mareike Franke, Christian Saager, Jan-Robert Kröger, Jan Borggrefe, Kersten Mückner
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.2022; 194(04): 384.     CrossRef
  • The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(10): 7114.     CrossRef
  • Lymphatic Interventions in the Cancer Patient
    Eslam Wassal Youssef, Ahmed Aly, Akshaar Brahmbhatt, Amgad Moussa, Ernesto Santos
    Current Oncology Reports.2022; 24(10): 1351.     CrossRef
  • Difficult-to-treat Retroperitoneal Lymphocele Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion―A Case Report―
    Motonori Ishii, Masahito Hara, Yu Yamamoto, Mamoru Matsuo, Hiroshi Ito, Daimon Shiraishi, Masataka Ando, Masakazu Takayasu
    Spinal Surgery.2022; 36(1): 66.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Sentinel Node Mapping in Decreasing the Risk of Lymphocele in Endometrial Cancer
    Thiago Pereira Diniz, Eric Drizlionoks, Carlos Chaves Faloppa, Jacqueline Nunes Menezes, Henrique Mantoan, Bruna Tirapelli Gonçalves, Paulo Henrique Domingues Miranda Brandao, Lillian Yuri Kumagai, Levon Badiglian-Filho, Alexandre Andre Balieiro Anastacio
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(6): 3293.     CrossRef
  • Fistula formation between infected pelvic lymphocele and sigmoid colon: A rare complication of pelvic lymphadenectomy
    Soukaina Allioui, Sanae Sninate, Hounayda Jerguigue, Rachida Latib, Youssef Omor
    Radiology Case Reports.2021; 16(3): 707.     CrossRef
  • Managing infected seroma post-lymphadenectomy; A retrospective cohort study and cost analysis in melanoma patients
    A.V. Robinson, F. Ali, D.J. Dewar, A.H.S. Peach
    Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.2021; 74(9): 2251.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations and Clinical Validation of Inguinal Clinical Target Volume Delineation in Penile Cancer
    Rishi Mittal, Rahul Krishnatry, Priyamvada Maitre, Vedang Murthy
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2021; 111(3): 741.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of lymphatic complications between sentinel node navigation surgery and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer
    Shinichi Togami, Rintaro Kubo, Toshihiko Kawamura, Shintaro Yanazume, Masaki Kamio, Hiroaki Kobayashi
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 50(5): 543.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of lymphocele with negative pressure wound therapy post inguinal mass excision: A case-report
    Caio Cesar Martins Focássio, Ricardo Augusto Bravo Gamboa, Luis Felipe Staut de Marco, Daniela Mina Fukasawa, Talita da Silva Parente, Vitor Leoni Boher Lopes Dornas
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2020; 66: 43.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of and risk factors for lymphocele formation after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    K. Ochiai, M. Kaneko, H. Nozawa, K. Kawai, K. Hata, T. Tanaka, T. Nishikawa, Y. Shuno, K. Sasaki, M. Hiyoshi, S. Emoto, K. Murono, H. Sonoda, S. Ishihara
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • Early Postoperative Complications and Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Moderately Obese Patients
    Karola Warzyszyńska, Michał Zawistowski, Edyta Karpeta, Agata Ostaszewska, Maurycy Jonas, Maciej Kosieradzki
    Transplantation Proceedings.2020; 52(8): 2318.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Factors of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Gynecologic Cancer Survivors with Lower Extremity Edema: A Single-Center and Retrospective Study
    Jungin Kim, Hyun-Jun Kim, Seunghun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Tae Hee Kim
    Healthcare.2020; 8(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for lymphatic complications following lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer
    Shinichi Togami, Rintaro Kubo, Toshihiko Kawamura, Shintaro Yanazume, Masaki Kamio, Hiroaki Kobayashi
    Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020; 59(3): 420.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of postoperative benign pelvic cysts occurred after gynecologic or gyne-oncologic surgery treated with percutaneous transcatheteric sclerosant alcohol therapy
    Cihan Comba, AysunErbahceci Salik, Gokhan Demirayak, SakirVolkan Erdogan, Filiz Sacan, IsaAykut Ozdemir
    Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2020; 9(4): 198.     CrossRef
  • Distribution of lymphocele following lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological malignancies
    Soo Youn Song, Mia Park, Byung Hun Kang, Jung Bo Yang, Young Bok Ko, Mina Lee, Ki Hwan Lee, Heon Jong Yoo
    Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2020; 63(6): 700.     CrossRef
  • Combined treatment with lymphaticovenular anastomosis and ethanol sclerotherapy for femoral lymphocele with lymphedema after oncologic surgery
    Shuhei Yoshida, Isao Koshima, Hirofumi Imai, Ayano Sasaki, Shogo Nagamatsu, Kazunori Yokota
    Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols.2020; 1(1): e0007.     CrossRef
  • Decreasing Lymphoid Fluid Accumulation During Lymph-Node Dissection
    Tanitra Tantitamit, Kuan-Gen Huang, Lih-Lian Hwang
    Journal of Gynecologic Surgery.2019; 35(3): 129.     CrossRef
  • Lymphatic cysts after gynecological cancer surgery: risk factors, diagnosis and treatment
    Т. Т. Rogovskaya, I. V. Berlev
    Tumors of female reproductive system.2019; 14(4): 72.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Lymphoceles in Women Who Underwent Laparotomic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gynecologic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Hui-Hua Chen, Wan-Hua Ting, Ho-Hsiung Lin, Sheng-Mou Hsiao
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(6): 936.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound characteristics of a symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy
    Vit Weinberger, Daniela Fischerova, Ivana Semeradova, Jiri Slama, David Cibula, Michal Zikan
    Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2019; 58(2): 266.     CrossRef
  • Bilateral hydronephrosis subsequent to a giant lymphocele after robotic radical prostatectomy
    Erdem Koç, Bahri Gök, Davut Kamacı, Erem Asil, Ali Fuat Atmaca
    Journal of Surgery and Medicine.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Manejo postoperatorio de cistectomía radical. Revisión de la evidencia sobre la prevención y el tratamiento de las complicaciones urológicas
    O. Rodríguez Faba, R. Parada Moreno, L. Malca, A. Palomino Martínez, N. Nervo, A. Breda, C. Esquinas, J. Palou
    Actas Urológicas Españolas.2018; 42(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer—Feasibility, safety and lymphatic complications
    Barbara Geppert, Céline Lönnerfors, Michele Bollino, Jan Persson
    Gynecologic Oncology.2018; 148(3): 491.     CrossRef
  • Embolization Using N-butyl Cyanoacrylate for Postoperative Lymphatic Leakage: A Case Report
    Emina Kayama, Koshiro Nishimoto, Gou Kaneko, Suguru Shirotake, Taiki Hayashi, Hideyuki Kondo, Takashi Okabe, Ken Nakazawa, Masafumi Oyama
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2018; 16(2): e355.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative management of radical cystectomy. Review of the evidence on the prevention and treatment of urological complications
    O. Rodríguez Faba, R. Parada Moreno, L. Malca, A. Palomino Martínez, N. Nervo, A. Breda, C. Esquinas, J. Palou
    Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition).2018; 42(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Exploring the Effect of TachoSil on Lymphocele Formation After Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer
    Sarah Buelens, Charles Van Praet, Filip Poelaert, Andries Van Huele, Karel Decaestecker, Nicolaas Lumen
    Urology.2018; 118: 134.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors, microbiology and management of infected lymphocyst after lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies
    Xuegong Ma, Yingmei Wang, Aiping Fan, Mengting Dong, Xin Zhao, Xuhong Zhang, Fengxia Xue
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2018; 298(6): 1195.     CrossRef
  • The role of pelvic lymphocele in the development of early postoperative complications
    Octavian Constantin Neagoe, Mihaela Ionica, Octavian Mazilu
    Medicine.2018; 97(37): e12353.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for lymphatic complications following lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer
    Shinichi Togami, Toshihiko Kawamura, Mika Fukuda, Shintaro Yanazume, Masaki Kamio, Hiroaki Kobayashi
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018; 48(12): 1036.     CrossRef
  • Microbiological evaluation of infected pelvic lymphocele after robotic prostatectomy: potential predictors for culture positivity and selection of the best empirical antimicrobial therapy
    Alaa Hamada, Catalina Hwang, Jorge Fleisher, Ingolf Tuerk
    International Urology and Nephrology.2017; 49(7): 1183.     CrossRef
  • Nomogram predicting risk of lymphocele in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing pelvic lymph node dissection
    Baraem Yoo, Hyojeong Ahn, Miseon Kim, Dong Hoon Suh, Kidong Kim, Jae Hong No, Yong Beom Kim
    Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2017; 60(5): 440.     CrossRef
  • A successful case of a para-aortic lymphocele treated with autologous peripheral blood injection
    Keiji Nishibeppu, Tomohiro Arita, Masayoshi Nakanishi, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Yasutoshi Murayama, Katsutoshi Shoda, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Ryo Morimura, Shuhei Komatsu, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hisashi Ikoma, Daisuke Ichikawa, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Kazuma Okam
    Radiology Case Reports.2017; 12(4): 760.     CrossRef
  • Retroperitoneal Lymphocele in a Patient with Primary Ovarian Cancer: A Case Report
    Leila Mousavi Seresht, Meysam Izadi, Zohreh Yousefi, Amir Hosein Jafarian, Nooshin Babapour, Laya Shirinzadeh, Zahra Rastin
    Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research.2017; 2(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • A review of the postoperative lymphatic leakage
    Shulan Lv, Qing Wang, Wanqiu Zhao, Lu Han, Qi Wang, Nasra Batchu, Qurat Ulain, Junkai Zou, Chao Sun, Jiang Du, Qing Song, Qiling Li
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(40): 69062.     CrossRef
  • Symptomatic Lymphocele Formation After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
    Nasuh Utku Dogan, Nigar Garagozova, Tatiana Pfiffer, Anna Beier, Christhardt Köhler, Giovanni Favero
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2016; 23(3): 442.     CrossRef
  • Risk factor analysis for massive lymphatic ascites after laparoscopic retroperitonal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers and treatment using intranodal lymphangiography with glue embolization
    Tae-Wook Kong, Suk-Joon Chang, Jinoo Kim, Jiheum Paek, Su Hyun Kim, Je Hwan Won, Hee-Sug Ryu
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of TachoSil® to Prevent Symptomatic Lymphocele after an Aggressive Tumor Debulking with Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer. A Pilot Study
    Lucas Minig, Maria Guadalupe Patrono, Jose Miguel Cárdenas-Rebollo, Pedro Martin Marfil, Virginia Rodriguez-Tabares, Linus Chuang
    Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.2016; 81(6): 497.     CrossRef
  • Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients With Pelvic Lymphocele After Surgery: Clinical and Dosimetric Data of 30 Patients
    Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Sarah Pia Colangione, Cristiana Fodor, Stefania Russo, Raffaella Cambria, Dario Zerini, Maria Bonora, Agnese Cecconi, Barbara Vischioni, Andrea Vavassori, Deliu Victor Matei, Danilo Bottero, Antonio Brescia, Gennaro Musi, Fe
    Clinical Genitourinary Cancer.2015; 13(4): e223.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Timing for Drainage of Infected LymphocystsAfter Lymphadenectomy for Gynecologic Cancer
    Kosuke Hiramatsu, Eiji Kobayashi, Yutaka Ueda, Tomomi Egawa-Takata, Shinya Matsuzaki, Toshihiro Kimura, Kenjiro Sawada, Kiyoshi Yoshino, Masami Fujita, Tadashi Kimura
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2015; 25(2): 337.     CrossRef
  • A prospective study examining the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphoceles following lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancer
    Michal Zikan, Daniela Fischerova, Ivana Pinkavova, Jiri Slama, Vit Weinberger, Ladislav Dusek, David Cibula
    Gynecologic Oncology.2015; 137(2): 291.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of Lymphoceles Using FloSeal and CoSeal After Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies
    Christhardt Köhler, Sarah Kyeyamwa, Simone Marnitz, Audrey Tsunoda, Filiberto Vercelino, Achim Schneider, Giovanni Favero
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2015; 22(3): 451.     CrossRef
  • Les lymphadénectomies dans le cancer de l’endomètre, bilan après 4ans de pratique, doit-on poursuivre ?
    Nicolas Agar, Anne-Cécile Philippe, Nicolas Bourdel, Benoît Rabischong, Michel Canis, Guillaume Le Bouedec, Aurélien Mulliez, Jacques Dauplat, Christophe Pomel
    Bulletin du Cancer.2015; 102(5): 428.     CrossRef
  • Impact of lymphoceles on organ at risk doses in patients undergoing adjuvant pelvic radiation for carcinoma cervix
    Chandani Hotwani, Supriya Chopra, Nara Moirangthem, Sarthak Mohanty
    International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology.2015; 3(2): 3220.     CrossRef
  • Bleomycin Sclerotherapy for Severe Symptomatic and Persistent Pelvic Lymphocele
    Ana Sofia Fernandes, Antónia Costa, Raquel Mota, Vera Paiva
    Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology.2014; 2014: 1.     CrossRef
  • Lymphocele: prevalence and management in gynecological malignancies
    Vit Weinberger, David Cibula, Michal Zikan
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2014; 14(3): 307.     CrossRef
  • Early Cervical Carcinoma and Fertility-sparing Treatment Options: MR Imaging as a Tool in Patient Selection and a Follow-up Modality
    Patricia Noël, Mireille Dubé, Marie Plante, Guillaume St-Laurent
    RadioGraphics.2014; 34(4): 1099.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of lymphocele development in gynecologic cancers by the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device
    Naotake Tsuda, Kimio Ushijima, Kouichiro Kawano, Shuji Takemoto, Shin Nishio, Gounosuke Sonoda, Toshiharu Kamura
    Journal of Gynecologic Oncology.2014; 25(3): 229.     CrossRef
  • Lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score‐matching study
    Joo Yong Lee, Richilda Red Diaz, Kang Su Cho, Ho Song Yu, Jae Seung Chung, Won Sik Ham, Young Deuk Choi
    International Journal of Urology.2013; 20(12): 1169.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian Cystic Lesions
    Susan Ackerman, Abid Irshad, Madelene Lewis, Munazza Anis
    Radiologic Clinics of North America.2013; 51(6): 1067.     CrossRef
  • Acute Kidney Injury after a Pelvic Surgery
    Mototsugu Tanaka, Junichi Hirahashi, Takamoto Ohse, Toshiro Fujita
    Nephrology.2013; 18(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Effective treatment of pelvic lymphocele by lymphaticovenular anastomosis
    Takeshi Todokoro, Dominic Furniss, Katsutoshi Oda, Kei Kawana, Mitsunaga Narushima, Makoto Mihara, Kazuki Kikuchi, Hisako Hara, Tetsu Yano, Isao Koshima
    Gynecologic Oncology.2013; 128(2): 209.     CrossRef
  • Complications of lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer
    A. Achouri, C. Huchon, A.S. Bats, C. Bensaid, C. Nos, F. Lécuru
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2013; 39(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • Idiopathic Lymphocele: A Possible Diagnosis for Infraclavicular Masses
    Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes Junior, Salim Abdon Haber Jeha
    Case Reports in Surgery.2012; 2012: 1.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of lymphocele after RAH with pelvic lymph node dissection for women with cervical cancer
    Ji Yen Lee, Jaeman Bae, Sun-Joo Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Soo Nyung Kim
    Korean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.2012; 55(12): 907.     CrossRef
  • Body mass index and survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Dong Hoon Suh, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Jae Weon Kim, Noh Hyun Park, Yong Sang Song, Soon‐Beom Kang
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2012; 38(1): 70.     CrossRef
  • Lymphocele and Ovarian Cancer: Risk Factors and Impact on Survival
    Tristan Gauthier, Catherine Uzan, Delphine Lefeuvre, Aminata Kane, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Fredéric Deschamps, Catherine Lhomme, Patricia Pautier, Philippe Morice, Sébastien Gouy
    The Oncologist.2012; 17(9): 1198.     CrossRef
  • Prévention des lymphocèles et cancers gynécologiques
    T. Gauthier, S. Gouy, C. Uzan, A. Kane, P. Morice
    Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.2011; 39(12): 698.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted removal of a lymphocyst causing severe neuralgic pain and adductor atrophy
    Giorgio Cazzaniga, Christer Borgfeldt, Nils-Olof Wallengren, Jan Persson
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2011; 5(4): 299.     CrossRef
  • Nonovarian Cystic Lesions of the Pelvis
    Penelope L. Moyle, Masako Y. Kataoka, Asako Nakai, Akiko Takahata, Caroline Reinhold, Evis Sala
    RadioGraphics.2010; 30(4): 921.     CrossRef
  • Late aortic lymphocele and residual ovary syndrome after gynecological surgery
    Maria Pastore, Natalina Manci, Claudia Marchetti, Francesca Esposito, Marialetizia Iuliano, Lucia Manganaro, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2007;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 17,665 View
  • 151 Download
  • 72 Crossref
Close layer
Oxaliplatin with Biweekly, Low Dose Leucovorin and Bolus and Continuous Infusion 5-fluorouracil (Modified FOLFOX 4) as First-line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Kyoung Tae Kim, Shin Ae Lee, Jong-Sung Park, Sung-Hyun Kim, Jae-Seok Kim, Hyo Jin Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(2):115-120.   Published online April 30, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.2.115
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

To determine the activity and toxicities of low dose leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen, combined with oxaliplatin every two weeks (modified FOLFOX 4), as a first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Between March 2001 and August 2003, fifty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion at days 1 plus LV 20 mg/m2 over 10 minutes, followed by 5-FU bolusa 400 mg/m2 bolus and 22 hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 5-FU at day 1~2. This treatment was repeated in 2 week intervals.

Results

The objective response rate was 40% on an intent-to-treatment analysis. Three patients (6%) demonstrated a complete response and nineteen patients (38%) showeda partial response. Sixteen patients (32%) showed a stable disease and eleven patients (22%) progressed during the course of the treatment. The median time to progression and overall survival time wereas 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.98~8.02 months) and the median overall survival time was 17.0 months (95% CI: 9.15~24.85 months) from the start of the chemotherapy, respectively. A total of 275 cycles were analyzed for toxicity. Major hematologic toxicities included grade 1~2 anemia (23.5%), neutropenia (25.3%) and thrombocytopenia (10.6%). There were only 2 cycles of neutropenic fever. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were grade 1~2 nausea/vomiting (10.9%), diarrhea (9.1%) and grade 1 neuropathy (18.0%). There was no treatment related death.

Conclusion

The modified folfox 4 regimen is safe and effective regimen as a first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX4 for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
    Dong Hyun Lee, Sung Yong Oh, Yu Rim Lee, Seok Jae Huh, Hyun Hwa Yoon, Sung Hyun Kim, Suee Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Young Kim, Hyo-Jin Kim, Hyuk-Chan Kwon
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2011; 43(4): 225.     CrossRef
  • Outpatient-basis Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as First-line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
    Joon Ho Moon, Jong Gwang Kim, Sang Kyun Sohn, Jin Ho Baek, Yoon Young Cho, Yee Soo Chae, Byung Min Ahn, Shi Nae Kim, Soo Jung Lee, In Taek Lee, Gyu Seog Choi, Soo Han Jun
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2007; 22(3): 400.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin/5-FU without Leucovorin Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Byoung Yong Shim, Kang Moon Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Hyun Jin Kim, Hong Joo Cho, Jinmo Yang, Jun-Gi Kim, Hoon-Kyo Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2005; 37(4): 212.     CrossRef
  • Combination Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Low Dose Leucovorin in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer
    Yoon Mi Shin, Hae Suk Han, Seong Woo Lim, Byung Chul Kim, Kyung Suck Cheoi, Young Ook Eum, Seung Taek Kim, Ki Hyeong Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2005; 37(5): 284.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin with Biweekly Low Dose Leucovorin and Bolus and Continuous Infusion of 5-fluorouracil (Modified FOLFOX 4) as a Salvage Therapy for Patients w ith Advanced G astric Cancer
    Sung-Hwan Suh, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Ji-Hoon Jo, Young-Rak Cho, Bong-Gun Seo, Dong-Mee Lee, Sung-Hyun Kim, Jae-Seok Kim, Hyo-Jin Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2005; 37(5): 279.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin: Is It a New Standard Weapon for Colorectal Cancer?
    Si-Young Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2004; 36(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • 10,466 View
  • 72 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Clinical Significance of Apoptosis and p53 Protein Expression in Stage IIB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Treated with Radiotherapy Alone
Eun Ji Chung, Gwi Eon Kim, Jinsil Seong, Woo Ick Yang, Young Tae Kim, Chang Ok Suh
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 2000;32(3):638-646.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The purpose was to investigate the spontaneous apoptotic index (SAI) and p53 protein expression and to identify the role of SAI and p53 protein positivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty six patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, FIGO stage IIB, treated with curative radiotherapy alone between 1990 and 1993 were included in this study. Definitive radiotherapy including external beam and high-dose-rate brachytherapy was given. Pretreatment paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens of those patients were scored for apoptosis and p53 protein expression using mouse mondegrees Clonal antibody (DO-7) by immuno staining. Clinicopathologic characteristics were also studied in relation to SAI and p53 protein expression, and as prognostic factors for clinical outcome.
RESULTS
SAI and p53 were not related to any clinical characteristics. The range of the SAI was 0.2~4.7% (median 1.1%, mean 1.5%). The rate of p53 protein expression was 65.2% (30/46). Patients whose tumors had high SAI and low p53 protein positivity had better treatment outcome than those with lower SAI. There was also a significant correlation between the SAI and p53 protein expression.
CONCLUSION
The pretreatment SAI and p53 oncoprotein expression are clinically useful in predicting the clinical outcome of FIGO stage IIB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.
  • 2,625 View
  • 14 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP