Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to predict chemotherapy response before interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
Forty consecutive patients underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT at baseline and after one cycle of NAC. Metabolic responses were assessed by quantitative decrease in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with PET/CT. Decreases in SUVmax were compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) level before IDS, response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria before IDS, residual tumor at IDS, and I chemotherapy response score (CRS) at IDS.
Results
A 40% cut-off for the decrease in SUVmax provided the best performance to predict CRS 3 (compete or near-complete pathologic response), with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 81.8%, 72.4%, and 72.4%, respectively. According to this 40% cut-off, there were 17 (42.5%) metabolic responders (≥ 40%) and 23 (57.5%) metabolic non-responders (< 40%). Metabolic responders had higher rate of CRS 3 (52.9% vs. 8.7%, p=0.003), CA-125 normalization (< 35 U/mL) before IDS (76.5% vs. 39.1%, p=0.019), and no residual tumor at IDS (70.6% vs. 31.8%, p=0.025) compared with metabolic non-responders. There were significant associations with progression-free survival (p=0.021) between metabolic responders and non-responders, but not overall survival (p=0.335).
Conclusion
Early assessment with 18F-FDG-PET/CT after one cycle of NAC can be useful to predic response to chemotherapy before IDS in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Evaluation Value of CT in the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Patients Daying Mou, Shengyan Xie, Pingyuan Li, Mohammad Farukh Hashmi Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Radiomics Analysis of PET and CT Components of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging for Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Xihai Wang, Zaiming Lu Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Kyung Jin Eoh, Young Shin Chung, So Hyun Lee, Sun-Ae Park, Hee Jung Kim, Wookyeom Yang, In Ok Lee, Jung-Yun Lee, Hanbyoul Cho, Doo Byung Chay, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Jae-Hoon Kim, Young Tae Kim, Eun Ji Nam
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):956-963. Published online October 17, 2017
Purpose
Although the use of xenograft models is increasing, few studies have compared the clinical features or outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients according to the tumorigenicity of engrafted specimens. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether tumorigenicity was associated with the clinical features and outcomes of EOC patients.
Materials and Methods
Eighty-eight EOC patients who underwent primary or interval debulking surgery from June 2014 to December 2015 were included. Fresh tumor specimens were implanted subcutaneously on each flank of immunodeficient mice. Patient characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and germline mutation spectra were compared according to tumorigenicity.
Results
Xenografts were established successfully from 49 of 88 specimens. Tumorigenicity was associated with lymphovascular invasion and there was a propensity to engraft successfully with high-grade tumors. Tumors from patientswho underwent non-optimal (residual disease ≥ 1 cm) primary orinterval debulking surgery had a significantly greater propensity to achieve tumorigenicity than those who received optimal surgery. In addition, patients whose tumors became engrafted seemed to have a shorter PFS and more frequent germline mutations than patients whose tumors failed to engraft. Tumorigenicity was a significant factor for predicting PFS with advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and high-grade cancers.
Conclusions
Tumorigenicity in a xenograft model was a strong prognostic factor and was associated with more aggressive tumors in EOC patients. Xenograft models can be useful as a preclinical tool to predict prognosis and could be applied to further pharmacologic and genomic studies on personalized treatments.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
TOWARDS Study: Patient-Derived Xenograft Engraftment Predicts Poor Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Christos Vaklavas, Cindy B. Matsen, Zhengtao Chu, Kenneth M. Boucher, Sandra D. Scherer, Satya Pathi, Anna Beck, Kirstyn E. Brownson, Saundra S. Buys, Namita Chittoria, Elyse D'Astous, H. Evin Gulbahce, N. Lynn Henry, Stephen Kimani, Jane Porretta, Regina JCO Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Generation, evolution, interfering factors, applications, and challenges of patient-derived xenograft models in immunodeficient mice Mingtang Zeng, Zijing Ruan, Jiaxi Tang, Maozhu Liu, Chengji Hu, Ping Fan, Xinhua Dai Cancer Cell International.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Cancer “Avatars”: Patient-Derived Xenograft Growth Correlation with Postoperative Recurrence and Survival in Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Isaac T Lynch, Amro M Abdelrahman, Roberto Alva-Ruiz, Alessandro Fogliati, Rondell P Graham, Rory Smoot, Mark J Truty Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 237(3): 483. CrossRef
Identification of Prognostic Markers of Gynecologic Cancers Utilizing Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Models Ha-Yeon Shin, Eun-ju Lee, Wookyeom Yang, Hyo Sun Kim, Dawn Chung, Hanbyoul Cho, Jae-Hoon Kim Cancers.2022; 14(3): 829. CrossRef
Experimental models for ovarian cancer research Sum In Tsang, Ayon A. Hassan, Sally K.Y. To, Alice S.T. Wong Experimental Cell Research.2022; 416(1): 113150. CrossRef
Preclinical models of epithelial ovarian cancer: practical considerations and challenges for a meaningful application Alessandra Ciucci, Marianna Buttarelli, Anna Fagotti, Giovanni Scambia, Daniela Gallo Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Harnessing preclinical models for the interrogation of ovarian cancer Tianyu Qin, Junpeng Fan, Funian Lu, Li Zhang, Chen Liu, Qiyue Xiong, Yang Zhao, Gang Chen, Chaoyang Sun Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic value of patient‐derived xenograft engraftment in pediatric sarcomas Helena Castillo‐Ecija, Guillem Pascual‐Pasto, Sara Perez‐Jaume, Claudia Resa‐Pares, Monica Vila‐Ubach, Carles Monterrubio, Ana Jimenez‐Cabaco, Merce Baulenas‐Farres, Oscar Muñoz‐Aznar, Noelia Salvador, Maria Cuadrado‐Vilanova, Nagore G Olaciregui, Leire B The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research.2021; 7(4): 338. CrossRef
Biliary tract cancer patient-derived xenografts: Surgeon impact on individualized medicine Jennifer L. Leiting, Stephen J. Murphy, John R. Bergquist, Matthew C. Hernandez, Tommy Ivanics, Amro M. Abdelrahman, Lin Yang, Isaac Lynch, James B. Smadbeck, Sean P. Cleary, David M. Nagorney, Michael S. Torbenson, Rondell P. Graham, Lewis R. Roberts, Gr JHEP Reports.2020; 2(2): 100068. CrossRef
Patient-derived xenograft model engraftment predicts poor prognosis after surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer Qi Chen, Tao Wei, Jianxin Wang, Qi Zhang, Jin Li, Jingying Zhang, Lei Ni, Yi Wang, Xueli Bai, Tingbo Liang Pancreatology.2020; 20(3): 485. CrossRef
A Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts Suad M. Abdirahman, Michael Christie, Adele Preaudet, Marie C. U. Burstroem, Dmitri Mouradov, Belinda Lee, Oliver M. Sieber, Tracy L. Putoczki Cancers.2020; 12(9): 2340. CrossRef
High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Basic Sciences, Clinical and Therapeutic Standpoints Michael-Antony Lisio, Lili Fu, Alicia Goyeneche, Zu-hua Gao, Carlos Telleria International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(4): 952. CrossRef
Efficient use of patient-derived organoids as a preclinical model for gynecologic tumors Yoshiaki Maru, Naotake Tanaka, Makiko Itami, Yoshitaka Hippo Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 154(1): 189. CrossRef
Current Status of Patient-Derived Ovarian Cancer Models Yoshiaki Maru, Yoshitaka Hippo Cells.2019; 8(5): 505. CrossRef
Establishment of patient‐derived xenograft model in ovarian cancer and its influence factors analysis Jianfa Wu, Yunxi Zheng, Qi Tian, Ming Yao, Xiaofang Yi Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2019; 45(10): 2062. CrossRef
Ovarian Cancers: Genetic Abnormalities, Tumor Heterogeneity and Progression, Clonal Evolution and Cancer Stem Cells Ugo Testa, Eleonora Petrucci, Luca Pasquini, Germana Castelli, Elvira Pelosi Medicines.2018; 5(1): 16. CrossRef
PURPOSE The anti-tumor effect of the complex of acriflavine and guanosine (AG60) was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In vitro cytotoxicity of AG60 was measured using SRB assay, and in vivo antitumor activity of AG60 was examined in CDF1 mice intraperitoneally inoculated with the P388 leukemic cells and in ICR mice inguinally implanted with S-180 cells. Tumor size and mean survival time were determined. RESULTS AG60 and acriflavine showed strong anti-tumor effect in vitro on lung cancer (A549), renal cancer (UO-31) and colon cancer (COLO205) cells. However, AG60 did not show the cytotoxicity against normal cell line, 3T3. The range of the IC50 of AG60 to the various tumor cell lines was 0.09 microgram/ml through 1.94 microgram/ml. The treatment of ascitic tumor bearing CDF1 mice with AG60 resulted in over 160% increases in the mean survival time. The most effective dose of AG60 was 30 mg/kg body weight in tumor implanted mice. In solid tumor bearing ICR mice tumor growth and progression were suppressed in response to the different doses at 30 days; 69.8% suppression of tumor size in response to acriflavine, 16.0% to guanosine, 87.7% to AG60 and 78.5% to doxorubicin. In addition, 35% increases were observed in the means survival time of AG60 treated group compared with control group. CONCLUSION The prominant anti-tumor effects of AG60 shown in this report would represent the possibility of the clinical trials.