Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Young Saing Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
General
Comparison of the Data of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel from K-MASTER Project with That of Orthogonal Methods for Detecting Targetable Genetic Alterations
Yoon Ji Choi, Jung Yoon Choi, Ju Won Kim, Ah Reum Lim, Youngwoo Lee, Won Jin Chang, Soohyeon Lee, Jae Sook Sung, Hee-Joon Chung, Jong Won Lee, Eun Joo Kang, Jung Sun Kim, Taekyu Lim, Hye Sook Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Mi Sun Ahn, Young Saing Kim, Ji Hyun Park, Seungtaek Lim, Sung Shim Cho, Jang Ho Cho, Sang Won Shin, Kyong Hwa Park, Yeul Hong Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(1):30-39.   Published online May 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.218
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
K-MASTER project is a Korean national precision medicine platform that screened actionable mutations by analyzing next-generation sequencing (NGS) of solid tumor patients. We compared gene analyses between NGS panel from the K-MASTER project and orthogonal methods.
Materials and Methods
Colorectal, breast, non–small cell lung, and gastric cancer patients were included. We compared NGS results from K-MASTER projects with those of non-NGS orthogonal methods (KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer [CRC]; epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] fusion, and reactive oxygen species 1 [ROS1] fusion in non–small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) positivity in breast and gastric cancers).
Results
In the CRC cohort (n=225), the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were 87.4% and 79.3% (KRAS); 88.9% and 98.9% (NRAS); and 77.8% and 100.0% (BRAF), respectively. In the NSCLC cohort (n=109), the sensitivity and specificity of NGS for EGFR were 86.2% and 97.5%, respectively. The concordance rate for ALK fusion was 100%, but ROS1 fusion was positive in only one of three cases that were positive in orthogonal tests. In the breast cancer cohort (n=260), ERBB2 amplification was detected in 45 by NGS. Compared with orthogonal methods that integrated immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, sensitivity and specificity were 53.7% and 99.4%, respectively. In the gastric cancer cohort (n=64), ERBB2 amplification was detected in six by NGS. Compared with orthogonal methods, sensitivity and specificity were 62.5% and 98.2%, respectively.
Conclusion
The results of the K-MASTER NGS panel and orthogonal methods showed a different degree of agreement for each genetic alteration, but generally showed a high agreement rate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Integrated clinical and genomic models using machine-learning methods to predict the efficacy of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Yonghwa Choi, Jangwoo Lee, Keewon Shin, Ji Won Lee, Ju Won Kim, Soohyeon Lee, Yoon Ji Choi, Kyong Hwa Park, Jwa Hoon Kim
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Supporting Biomarker-Driven Therapies in Oncology: A Genomic Testing Cost Calculator
    Albrecht Stenzinger, Brian Cuffel, Noman Paracha, Eric Vail, Jesus Garcia-Foncillas, Clifford Goodman, Ulrik Lassen, Gilles Vassal, Sean D Sullivan
    The Oncologist.2023; 28(5): e242.     CrossRef
  • Genomic analysis of plasma circulating tumor DNA in patients with heavily pretreated HER2 + metastatic breast cancer
    Kyoungmin Lee, Jongwon Lee, Jungmin Choi, Sung Hoon Sim, Jeong Eun Kim, Min Hwan Kim, Yeon Hee Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Su-Jin Koh, Kyong Hwa Park, Myoung Joo Kang, Mi Sun Ahn, Kyoung Eun Lee, Hee-Jun Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Han Jo Kim, Keon Uk Park, In Hae Park
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group
    Shinkyo Yoon, Miso Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Han Sang Kim, Seung Tae Kim, Jihun Kim, Hongseok Yun, Changhoon Yoo, Hee Kyung Ahn, Hyo Song Kim, In Hee Lee, In-Ho Kim, Inkeun Park, Jae Ho Jeong, Jaekyung Cheon, Jin Won Kim, Jina Yun, Sun Min Lim, Yongjun Cha, Se
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 54(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 8,386 View
  • 255 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Chemotherapy versus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Jun Ho Ji, Young Saing Kim, Inkeun Park, Soon Il Lee, Rock Bum Kim, Joon Oh Park, Sung Yong Oh, In Gyu Hwang, Joung-Soon Jang, Haa-Na Song, Jung-Hun Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):791-800.   Published online August 23, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.044
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Although chemotherapy is recommended by various guidelines for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the evidence supporting its use over best supportive care (BSC) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival benefit of chemotherapy over that of BSC in advanced BTC patients.
Materials and Methods
Advanced BTC patientswith a good performance status (Eastern CooperativeOncologyGroup [ECOG] 0-2) were eligible for the study. Data were retrospectively collected from four tertiary cancer centers and analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 604 patients enrolled, 206 received BSC and 398 received chemotherapy. PSM analysis was performed using the following variables: age, ECOG status, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, white blood cell level, albumin level, total bilirubin level, and aspartate aminotransferase level. The sample size of each group was 164 patients after PSM. Median survival was compared between the two groups by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were investigated using Cox proportional regression analysis.
Results
In post-PSM analysis, the respective median survival for the chemotherapy and BSC groups was dependent on the following prognostic factors: total population, 12.0 months vs. 7.5 months (p=0.001); locally advanced disease, 16.7 months vs. 13.4 months (p=0.490); cancer antigen 19-9 ≤ 100 IU/mL, 12.7 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.330); and CEA ≤ 3.4 ng/mL, 17.1 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.052).
Conclusion
Chemotherapy improved overall survival of patients with advanced BTC who had a good performance status. However, this survival benefit was not observed in BTC patients with locally advanced disease or with lower tumor marker. Individualized approach is needed for initiation of palliative chemotherapy in advanced BTC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Faisal Saud Dar, Zaigham Abbas, Irfan Ahmed, Muhammad Atique, Usman Iqbal Aujla, Muhammad Azeemuddin, Zeba Aziz, Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti, Tariq Ali Bangash, Amna Subhan Butt, Osama Tariq Butt, Abdul Wahab Dogar, Javed Iqbal Farooqi, Faisal Hanif, Jahanzai
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(9): 1018.     CrossRef
  • Treatment patterns and survival in older adults with unresected nonmetastatic biliary tract cancers
    Ali Belkouz, Elise de Savornin Lohman, Jyothi R. Thumma, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Philip R. de Reuver, Martijn G.H. van Oijen, Cornelis J.A. Punt, Hari Nathan, Heinz-Josef Klümpen
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(3): 101447.     CrossRef
  • Main causes of death in advanced biliary tract cancer
    Kana Kimura‐Seto, Yasushi Kojima, Shiori Komori, Yuya Hisada, Yuki Otake, Yuka Yanai, Akiko Saito, Naoki Akazawa, Yasuo Tanaka, Chizu Yokoi, Mikio Yanase, Junichi Akiyama, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Kazuhiko Yamada
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(9): 10889.     CrossRef
  • A Systematised Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
    Vivian Peirce, Michael Paskow, Lei Qin, Ruby Dadzie, Maria Rapoport, Samantha Prince, Sukhvinder Johal
    Targeted Oncology.2023; 18(6): 837.     CrossRef
  • Short- and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer in the United States From 2000 to 2018
    Van Nghiem, Sarah Wood, Rekha Ramachandran, Grant Williams, Darryl Outlaw, Ravikumar Paluri, Young-il Kim, Olumide Gbolahan
    Cancer Control.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anticancer Drugs Compared to No Anticancer Drugs in Patients with Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancer: A Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map
    Carolina Requeijo, Javier Bracchiglione, Nicolás Meza, Roberto Acosta-Dighero, Josefina Salazar, Marilina Santero, Adriana-G Meade, María Jesús Quintana, Gerardo Rodríguez-Grijalva, Anna Selva, Ivan Solà, Gerard Urrútia, Xavier Bonfill Cosp
    Clinical Epidemiology.2023; Volume 15: 1069.     CrossRef
  • 8,158 View
  • 213 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Close layer
Prognostic Factors for Risk Stratification of Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Who Were Treated with Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy
Inkeun Park, Seung Joon Choi, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Junshik Hong, Sun Jin Sym, Jinny Park, Eun Kyung Cho, Jae Hoon Lee, Yong Ju Shin, Dong Bok Shin
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1264-1273.   Published online March 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.250
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of this study was to verify prognostic factors including sarcopenia in patients with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods Medical records and computed tomography scan of consecutive patients treated with palliative gemcitabine-based chemotherapy from 2008 to 2014 were reviewed. The lumbar skeletal muscle index at third lumbar spine level was computed, and together with clinicolaboratory factors, univariate and multivariable analyses for overall survival (OS) were performed.
Results
A total of 88 patients were found. Median age was 65 years, and male patients were predominant (67.0%). Most patients had initially metastatic disease (72.7%), and gemcitabine monotherapy was administered in 29 patients (33.0%) while gemcitabine plus erlotinib was administered in 59 patients (67.0%). Seventy-six patients (86.3%) had sarcopenia. With a median follow-up period of 44.3 months (range, 0.6 to 44.3 months), median OS was 5.35 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.11 to 6.59). In univariate and multivariable analysis, high carcinoembryonic antigen level (hazard ratio [HR], 4.18; 95% CI, 1.95 to 8.97; p < 0.001), initially metastatic disease (HR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.55 to 7.32; p=0.002), sarcopenia (HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.20 to 7.36; p=0.019), neutrophilia (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.27 to 6.79; p=0.012), and high lactate dehydrogenase level (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.58; p=0.029) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion Five independent prognostic factors in patients with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were identified. These findings may be helpful in prediction of prognosis in clinical practice and can be used as a stratification factor for clinical trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic value of deep learning-derived body composition in advanced pancreatic cancer—a retrospective multicenter study
    J. Keyl, A. Bucher, F. Jungmann, R. Hosch, A. Ziller, R. Armbruster, P. Malkomes, T.M. Reissig, S. Koitka, I. Tzianopoulos, P. Keyl, K. Kostbade, D. Albers, P. Markus, J. Treckmann, K. Nassenstein, J. Haubold, M. Makowski, M. Forsting, H.A. Baba, S. Kaspe
    ESMO Open.2024; 9(1): 102219.     CrossRef
  • Body composition measures as a determinant of Alpelisib related toxicity
    Eliya Shachar, Ari Raphael, Uriel Katz, Rivka Kessner, Shlomit Strulov Shachar
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 206(2): 369.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between LDH and GLIM criteria for cancer cachexia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Joshua J. Thompson, Josh McGovern, Campbell S.D. Roxburgh, Joanne Edwards, Ross D. Dolan, Donald C. McMillan
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 199: 104378.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Sarcopenia Determined by Computed Tomography in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
    Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini, Antonio Gámez Martínez, David Luengo Gómez, Francisco Valverde-López, Consolación Melguizo, José Prados
    Cancers.2024; 16(19): 3356.     CrossRef
  • Sarkopenie als unabhängiger Prognosefaktor bei Pankreaskarzinom
    Johanna Mandl, Sebastian Baumer, Bernadette Holtzem, Rainer Theurer, Niels Zorger, Oliver Pech
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2023; 61(10): 1365.     CrossRef
  • Association between Body Composition and Peripheral Neurotoxicity in Cancer Patients from North China Taking Nab-Paclitaxel
    Jiayuan Guo, Juan Zhao, Ming Gu, Jixiang Hou, Ting Xu, Ying Jiang, Caihong Jiang, Hui Li, Xiaorong Li, Guang Liu, Lanzhen Zhao, Gaowa Jin, Yongzhi Shi, Ting Liu, Zhenhao Li, Zewei Zhang, Quanfu Li
    Nutrition and Cancer.2023; 75(3): 805.     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer – a Meta-analysis
    Maximilian Thormann, Mattes Hinnerichs, Felix Barajas Ordonez, Sylvia Saalfeld, Aristoteles Perrakis, Roland Croner, Jazan Omari, Maciej Pech, Marina Zamsheva, Hans-Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke, Alexey Surov
    Academic Radiology.2023; 30(8): 1552.     CrossRef
  • Pre-Therapeutic Sarcopenia among Cancer Patients: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Predictive Value during Cancer Treatment
    Anne-Laure Couderc, Evelyne Liuu, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, Johanne Poisson, Maxime Frelaut, Coline Montégut, Soraya Mebarki, Romain Geiss, Zoé ap Thomas, Aurélien Noret, Monica Pierro, Capucine Baldini, Elena Paillaud, Frédéric Pamoukdjian
    Nutrients.2023; 15(5): 1193.     CrossRef
  • Association of myosteatosis with treatment response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing chemoembolization: a retrospective cohort study
    Kittipitch Bannangkoon, Keerati Hongsakul, Teeravut Tubtawee, Natee Ina, Ply Chichareon
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of pretreatment skeletal muscle index in pancreatic carcinoma patients: A meta-analysis
    Li Yang, Xianghui Liao, Zhong Xie, Haiwen Li
    Medicine.2023; 102(19): e33663.     CrossRef
  • Is Computed-Tomography-Based Body Composition a Reliable Predictor of Chemotherapy-Related Toxicity in Pancreatic Cancer Patients?
    Marco Cefalì, Isabel Scala, Giuliana Pavone, Daniel Helbling, Saskia Hussung, Ralph Fritsch, Cäcilia Reiner, Soleen Stocker, Dieter Koeberle, Marc Kissling, Vito Chianca, Filippo Del Grande, Sara De Dosso, Stefania Rizzo
    Cancers.2023; 15(17): 4398.     CrossRef
  • Sarkopenie als unabhängiger Prognosefaktor bei Pankreaskarzinom
    Johanna Mandl, Sebastian Baumer, Bernadette Holtzem, Rainer Theurer, Niels Zorger, Oliver Pech
    TumorDiagnostik & Therapie.2023; 44(10): 696.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Cancer Patient Nutritional Management: From Specific Needs to Novel Epigenetic Dietary Approaches
    Chiara Cencioni, Ilaria Trestini, Geny Piro, Emilio Bria, Giampaolo Tortora, Carmine Carbone, Francesco Spallotta
    Nutrients.2022; 14(8): 1542.     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia
    Hiroyuki Asama, Makoto Ueno, Satoshi Kobayashi, Taito Fukushima, Kuniyuki Kawano, Yusuke Sano, Satoshi Tanaka, Shuhei Nagashima, Manabu Morimoto, Hiromasa Ohira, Shin Maeda
    Pancreas.2022; 51(2): 148.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of sarcopenia as determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus nab‑paclitaxel: A retrospective study
    Yuichiro Tozuka, Makoto Ueno, Satoshi Kobayashi, Manabu Morimoto, Taito Fukushima, Yusuke Sano, Kuniyuki Kawano, Akane Hanaoka, Shun Tezuka, Hiroyuki Asama, Satoshi Moriya, Soichiro Morinaga, Shinichi Ohkawa, Shin Maeda
    Oncology Letters.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Body composition as a predictor of chemotherapy-related toxicity in pancreatic cancer patients: A systematic review
    Stefania Rizzo, Isabel Scala, Angela Rodriguez Robayo, Marco Cefalì, Sara De Dosso, Stefano Cappio, Genti Xhepa, Filippo Del Grande
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dynamic changes in the body composition during chemotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors in the context of active nutrition intervention
    Ting Xu, Zhenhao Li, Hui Li, Jixiang Hou, Jingjing Li, Gaowa Jin, Shaohua Li, Quanfu Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass during tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emanuele Rinninella, Marco Cintoni, Pauline Raoul, Francesca Romana Ponziani, Maurizio Pompili, Carmelo Pozzo, Antonia Strippoli, Emilio Bria, Giampaolo Tortora, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maria Cristina Mele
    Internal and Emergency Medicine.2021; 16(5): 1341.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of skeletal muscle density and sarcopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy: a retrospective observational study
    In-Ho Kim, Moon Hyung Choi, In Seok Lee, Tae Ho Hong, Myung Ah. Lee
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of body composition on short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1 in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer
    Tsuyoshi Takeda, Takashi Sasaki, Takafumi Mie, Takaaki Furukawa, Yuto Yamada, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Masato Matsuyama, Masato Ozaka, Naoki Sasahira
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 51(4): 604.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of skeletal muscle decrease in unresectable pancreatic cancer: Survival analysis using the Weibull exponential distribution model
    Hiroki Sato, Takuma Goto, Akihiro Hayashi, Hidemasa Kawabata, Tetsuhiro Okada, Shuhei Takauji, Junpei Sasajima, Katsuro Enomoto, Mikihiro Fujiya, Kyohei Oyama, Yusuke Ono, Ayumu Sugitani, Yusuke Mizukami, Toshikatsu Okumura
    Pancreatology.2021; 21(5): 892.     CrossRef
  • Current situation, consensus and controversy of perioperative nutrition management in pancreatic surgery: A narrative review
    Jingyong Xu, Junmin Wei
    Journal of Pancreatology.2021; 4(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Maintenance of skeletal muscle mass during FOLFIRINOX is a favorable prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients
    Dong Woo Shin, Minseok Albert Kim, Jong-chan Lee, Jaihwan Kim, Jin-Hyeok Hwang
    BMC Research Notes.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Depletion of Psoas Muscle Mass after Systemic Chemotherapy Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Naoto Iwai, Takashi Okuda, Kohei Oka, Junichi Sakagami, Taishi Harada, Tomoya Ohara, Chie Hattori, Masashi Taniguchi, Hiroaki Sakai, Tasuku Hara, Toshifumi Tsuji, Toshiyuki Komaki, Keizo Kagawa, Osamu Dohi, Hiroaki Yasuda, Yoshito Itoh
    Cancers.2021; 13(15): 3860.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant treatment: A window of opportunity for nutritional prehabilitation in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Ilaria Trestini, Marco Cintoni, Emanuele Rinninella, Futura Grassi, Salvatore Paiella, Roberto Salvia, Emilio Bria, Carmelo Pozzo, Sergio Alfieri, Antonio Gasbarrini, Giampaolo Tortora, Michele Milella, Maria Cristina Mele
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(9): 885.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Immunological Biomarkers
    Fleur van der Sijde, Dana A.M. Mustafa, Eveline E. Vietsch, Peter D. Katsikis, Casper H. J. van Eijck
    Pancreas.2021; 50(7): 933.     CrossRef
  • Influence of sarcopenia in major pancreatic surgery. A systematic review of the literature
    Raquel Aranzazu Latorre Fragua, Alba Manuel Vázquez, Carmen Ramiro Pérez, Roberto de la Plaza Llamas, José Manuel Ramia Ángel
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2020; 43(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Serum miR-338-3p and miR-199b-5p are associated with the absolute neutrophil count in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer
    Fleur van der Sijde, Eveline E. Vietsch, Dana A.M. Mustafa, Yunlei Li, Casper H.J. van Eijck
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2020; 505: 183.     CrossRef
  • Influence of sarcopenia in major pancreatic surgery. A systematic review of the literature
    Raquel Aranzazu Latorre Fragua, Alba Manuel Vázquez, Carmen Ramiro Pérez, Roberto de la Plaza Llamas, José Manuel Ramia Ángel
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2020; 43(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • The impact of sarcopenia on patients undergoing treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Julia R. Amundson, Jelani K. Williams, Andrew J. Benjamin, Hunter D.D. Witmer, Kevin K. Roggin
    Journal of Pancreatology.2020; 3(2): 59.     CrossRef
  • Impact of progressive resistance training on CT quantified muscle and adipose tissue compartments in pancreatic cancer patients
    Raoul Wochner, Dorothea Clauss, Johanna Nattenmüller, Christine Tjaden, Thomas Bruckner, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Thilo Hackert, Joachim Wiskemann, Karen Steindorf, Leonardo A. Peyré-Tartaruga
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0242785.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores
    Inhwan Hwang, Jihoon Kang, Hei Nga Natalie Ip, Jae Ho Jeong, Kyu-pyo Kim, Heung-Moon Chang, Changhoon Yoo, Baek-Yeol Ryoo
    Investigational New Drugs.2019; 37(3): 584.     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia is a reliable prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy
    Yusuke Kurita, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Motohiko Tokuhisa, Ayumu Goto, Kensuke Kubota, Itaru Endo, Atsushi Nakajima, Yasushi Ichikawa
    Pancreatology.2019; 19(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • Significance of the inflammation-based prognostic score in recurrent pancreatic cancer
    Kenji Nakagawa, Masayuki Sho, Takahiro Akahori, Minako Nagai, Kota Nakamura, Tadataka Takagi, Toshihiro Tanaka, Hideyuki Nishiofuku, Chiho Ohbayashi, Kimihiko Kichikawa, Naoya Ikeda
    Pancreatology.2019; 19(5): 722.     CrossRef
  • Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    James Bundred, Sivesh K. Kamarajah, Keith J. Roberts
    HPB.2019; 21(12): 1603.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Sarcopenia in Patients with Unresectable Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Sachiyo Onishi, Masahiro Tajika, Tsutomu Tanaka, Yutaka Hirayama, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Takamichi Kuwahara, Nozomi Okuno, Yoshitaka Inaba, Takeshi Kodaira, Tetsuya Abe, Kei Muro, Masahito Shimizu, Yasumasa Niwa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(10): 1647.     CrossRef
  • An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Aurélien Lambert, Lilian Schwarz, Ivan Borbath, Aline Henry, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, David Malka, Michel Ducreux, Thierry Conroy
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia Predicts Prognosis in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Independent of Tumor Stage and Liver Function
    Yeonjung Ha, Daejung Kim, Seungbong Han, Young Eun Chon, Yun Bin Lee, Mi Na Kim, Joo Ho Lee, Hana Park, Kyu Sung Rim, Seong Gyu Hwang
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(3): 843.     CrossRef
  • The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: How Important Is Muscle?
    Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano, Candyce H. Kroenke, Bette J. Caan
    Annual Review of Nutrition.2018; 38(1): 357.     CrossRef
  • Dietary fat stimulates pancreatic cancer growth and promotes fibrosis of the tumor microenvironment through the cholecystokinin receptor
    Sandeep Nadella, Julian Burks, Abdulhameed Al-Sabban, Gloria Inyang, Juan Wang, Robin D. Tucker, Marie E. Zamanis, William Bukowski, Narayan Shivapurkar, Jill P. Smith
    American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology.2018; 315(5): G699.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase level in pancreatic cancer patients
    Jianxin Gan, Wenhu Wang, Zengxi Yang, Jiebin Pan, Liang Zheng, Lanning Yin
    Medicine.2018; 97(46): e13151.     CrossRef
  • 11,619 View
  • 224 Download
  • 41 Web of Science
  • 41 Crossref
Close layer
Is There a Role for Adjuvant Therapy in R0 Resected Gallbladder Cancer?: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Se-Il Go, Young Saing Kim, In Gyu Hwang, Eun Young Kim, Sung Yong Oh, Jun Ho Ji, Haa-Na Song, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Jung Hun Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1274-1285.   Published online February 12, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.502
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients who have undergone R0 resection.
Materials and Methods
Clinical data were collected on 441 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage I-III GBC. Eligible patients were classified into adjuvant therapy and surveillance only groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) between the two groups was performed, adjusting clinical factors.
Results
In total, 84 and 279 patients treated with adjuvant therapy and followed up with surveillance only, respectively, were included in the analysis. Before PSM, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was lower in the adjuvant therapy group than in the surveillance only group (50.8% vs. 74.8%, p < 0.001), although there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (66.2% vs. 79.5%, p=0.089). After the PSM, baseline characteristics became comparable and there were no differences in the 5-year RFS (50.8% vs. 64.8%, p=0.319) and OS (66.2% vs. 70.4%, p=0.703) rates between the two groups.
Conclusion
The results suggest that fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy is not indicated in stage I-III GBC patients who have undergone R0 resection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy vs. No Chemotherapy for Patients with Carcinoma of Gallbladder Undergoing Curative Resection
    Sundeep Singh Saluja, Phani Kumar Nekarakanti, Pramod Kumar Mishra, Anurita Srivastava, Kishore Singh
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2022; 26(2): 398.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Bayesian Network Analysis
    Xiuqiong Chen, Fanqiao Meng, Hua Xiong, Yanmei Zou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers
    Angela Lamarca, Julien Edeline, Mairéad G McNamara, Richard A Hubner, Masato Nagino, John Bridgewater, John Primrose, Juan W Valle
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2020; 84: 101936.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors and patterns of loco-regional failure in patients with R0 resected gallbladder cancer
    Jung Ho Im, Woo Jung Lee, Chang Moo Kang, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Jinsil Seong
    HPB.2020; 22(8): 1168.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Operated Gallbladder Cancer
    Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu, Ahmet Bilici, Mesut Seker, Umut Kefeli, Dincer Aydin, Serkan Celik, Tarik Demir, Burcak Erkol
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2019; 50(3): 451.     CrossRef
  • Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected T2N0 Gall Bladder Cancer
    Abhay K. Kattepur, Shraddha Patkar, Mahesh Goel, Anant Ramaswamy, Vikas Ostwal
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2019; 23(11): 2232.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for patients with gallbladder cancer
    Carlos Manterola, Galo Duque, Luis Grande, Xabier de Aretxabala, Roque Conejeros, Tamara Otzen, Nayely García
    HPB.2019; 21(11): 1427.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Byoung Hyuck Kim, Jeanny Kwon, Eui Kyu Chie, Kyubo Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Dong Wan Seo, Amol K. Narang, Joseph M. Herman
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2018; 25(1): 255.     CrossRef
  • Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer
    T Ebata, S Hirano, M Konishi, K Uesaka, Y Tsuchiya, M Ohtsuka, Y Kaneoka, M Yamamoto, Y Ambo, Y Shimizu, F Ozawa, A Fukutomi, M Ando, Y Nimura, M Nagino, S Nakamori, T Ajiki, H Baba, R Yamaguchi, M Kawai, H Nagano, F Miura, T Arai, Y Nishiwaki, S Kawasaki
    British Journal of Surgery.2018; 105(3): 192.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant systemic therapy and postoperative outcomes after resection of node positive gallbladder cancer
    Jiong-Jie Yu, Xin-Fei Xu, Tian Yang
    International Journal of Surgery.2018; 54: 307.     CrossRef
  • The efficiency and regimen choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer
    Luxi Yin, Qi Xu, Jingjing Li, Qing Wei, Jieer Ying
    Medicine.2018; 97(50): e13570.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Management of Gallbladder Cancer
    Gyulnara G. Kasumova, Omidreza Tabatabaie, Robert M. Najarian, Mark P. Callery, Sing Chau Ng, Andrea J. Bullock, Robert A. Fisher, Jennifer F. Tseng
    Annals of Surgery.2017; 266(4): 625.     CrossRef
  • 14,966 View
  • 203 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Close layer
Randomized Phase II Study of Pemetrexed Versus Gefitinib in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Young Saing Kim, Eun Kyung Cho, Hyun Sun Woo, Junshik Hong, Hee Kyung Ahn, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Sun Young Kyung, Shin Myung Kang, Jeong-Woong Park, Sung Hwan Jeong, Jinny Park, Jae Hoon Lee, Dong Bok Shin
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(1):80-87.   Published online March 2, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.307
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Materials and Methods Patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) or recurrent NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either 500 mg/m² of pemetrexed intravenously every 3 weeks or gefitinib 250 mg/day orally. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months.
Results
A total of 95 patients were enrolled (47 for pemetrexed and 48 for gefitinib). Most patients were male (72%) and current/ex-smokers (69%), and 80% had non-squamous cell carcinoma. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status was determined in 38 patients (40%); one patient per each arm was positive for EGFRmutation. The 6-month PFS rates were 22% and 15% for pemetrexed and gefitinib, respectively (p=0.35). Both arms showed an identical median PFS of 2.0 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.5 months. In EGFR wild-type patients, higher response rate (RR) and longer PFS as well as OS were achieved via pemetrexed compared with gefitinib, although there were no significant differences (RR: 39% vs. 9%, p=0.07; median PFS: 6.6 months vs. 3.1 months, p=0.45; median OS: 29.6 months vs. 12.9 months, p=0.62). Toxicities were mild in both treatment arms. Frequently reported toxicities were anemia and fatigue for pemetrexed, and skin rash and anorexia for gefitinib. Conclusion Both pemetrexed and gefitinib had similar efficacy with good tolerability as second-line treatment in unselected patients with advanced NSCLC. However, pemetrexed is considered more effective than gefitinib for EGFR wild-type patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based treatments for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer
    Himani Aggarwal, Kerigo Ndirangu, Katherine B Winfree, Catherine Elizabeth Muehlenbein, Emily Zhu, Vanita Tongbram, Howard Thom
    Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Toxicity profile of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yi Zhao, Bo Cheng, Zisheng Chen, Jianfu Li, Hengrui Liang, Ying Chen, Feng Zhu, Caichen Li, Ke Xu, Shan Xiong, Weixiang Lu, Zhuxing Chen, Ran Zhong, Shen Zhao, Zhanhong Xie, Jun Liu, Wenhua Liang, Jianxing He
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2021; 160: 103305.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Pemetrexed and Gefitinib in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhihao Zhang, Xiyong Wang, Huaiqing Xiao, Dongqiang Wu, Dongliang Zhang, Qun Yu, Linna Yuan, Tao Huang
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of pemetrexed compared with gefitinib for pre-treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC
    Xiaoxin Lu, Shengshu Li, Weizong Chen, Dongyang Zheng, Yuzhu Li, Fang Li
    Medicine.2020; 99(29): e21170.     CrossRef
  • Pemetrexed versus Gefitinib as Second-line Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huiyu Wang, Zunjing Zhang, Feng Liu, Miaoying Zhou, Handi Lv
    Pteridines.2019; 30(1): 171.     CrossRef
  • Gefitinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Esther HA Sim, Ian A Yang, Richard Wood-Baker, Rayleen V Bowman, Kwun M Fong
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Meta-analysis of 153 cohorts with 15,713 patients
    Chong Hyun Suh, Hye Sun Park, Kyung Won Kim, Junhee Pyo, Hiroto Hatabu, Mizuki Nishino
    Lung Cancer.2018; 123: 60.     CrossRef
  • Second-Line Treatment of NSCLC—The Pan-ErbB Inhibitor Afatinib in Times of Shifting Paradigms
    Jens Köhler
    Frontiers in Medicine.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13,162 View
  • 124 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
Oxaliplatin-Induced Immune-Mediated Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report
Hyun Sun Woo, Kyoung Hwa Lee, Phill Hoon Yoon, Su Ji Kim, Inkeun Park, Young Saing Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Junshik Hong, Dong Bok Shin, Sun Jin Sym
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):949-953.   Published online October 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.052
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum derivative used for metastatic or advanced colorectal cancer treatment. Although myelosuppression is the most common cause of oxaliplatin-induced thrombocytopenia, rare cases of oxaliplatin-induced immunemediated thrombocytopenia are reported. We report a case of a 57-year-old woman with colon cancer who developed gum bleeding and petechiae after oxaliplatin infusion. Laboratory tests revealed grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia. She recovered from the thrombocytopenia and accompanying neutropenia within 4 days with no recurrence following discontinuation of oxaliplatin. Physicians need to be aware of the risk of severe acute thrombocytopenia following oxaliplatin administration.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors of Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia After Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies
    Ju Li, Wanqing Wang, Kaipeng Jiang, Jiuwei Cui, Chang Wang, Tingting Liang, Yizhuo Wang, Shuhan Liu, Wenshuo Zhou
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(3): 1144.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin Antibody-Related Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report
    Khin Pyai, David I LeRoy, Joseph Attallah, Hosam Hakim, Zyad Kafri
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Many Faces of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Mechanisms, Therapies, and Clinical Challenges in Oncological Patients
    Marek Kos, Piotr Tomaka, Paulina Mertowska, Sebastian Mertowski, Julia Wojnicka, Anna Błażewicz, Ewelina Grywalska, Krzysztof Bojarski
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(22): 6738.     CrossRef
  • Severe ileum bleeding following adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy for locally advanced colon cancer: a case report and review of the literature
    You Zou, Shuang Liu, Jianhong Wu, Zhen Sun
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A case of idiosyncratic liver injury after oxaliplatin‐induced thrombocytopenia
    Shinji Honda, Masayuki Tsujimoto, Tetsuya Minegaki, Tomohiko Mori, Junji Muraoka, Kohshi Nishiguchi
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2020; 45(2): 373.     CrossRef
  • Ototoxicity and Platinum Uptake Following Cyclic Administration of Platinum-Based Chemotherapeutic Agents
    Benjamin K. Gersten, Tracy S. Fitzgerald, Katharine A. Fernandez, Lisa L. Cunningham
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.2020; 21(4): 303.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report and Review of Pathophysiology of Various Speculative Mechanisms
    Haider Ghazanfar, Iqra Nawaz, Nisha Ali
    Cureus.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin Treatment Alters Systemic Immune Responses
    Vanesa Stojanovska, Monica Prakash, Rachel McQuade, Sarah Fraser, Vasso Apostolopoulos, Samy Sakkal, Kulmira Nurgali
    BioMed Research International.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin Immune-Induced Syndrome Occurs With Cumulative Administration and Rechallenge: Single Institution Series and Systematic Review Study
    Katia Bencardino, Gianluca Mauri, Alessio Amatu, Federica Tosi, Erica Bonazzina, Laura Palmeri, Marialuisa Querques, Federica Ravera, Alberto Menegotto, Elisa Boiani, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Salvatore Siena
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2016; 15(3): 213.     CrossRef
  • 12,587 View
  • 116 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FOLFOX-4) Combination Chemotherapy as a Salvage Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer
Young Saing Kim, Junshik Hong, Sun Jin Sym, Se Hoon Park, Jinny Park, Eun Kyung Cho, Jae Hoon Lee, Dong Bok Shin
Cancer Res Treat. 2010;42(1):24-29.   Published online March 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2010.42.1.24
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy as a salvage treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Materials and Methods

The AGC patients with an ECOG performance status of 0~1 and progressive disease after prior treatments were registered onto this phase II trial. The patients received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 1), leucovorin (200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 as a bolus and 600 mg/m2 as a 22-hour infusion on days 1 and 2) every 2 weeks.

Results

For the 42 treated patients, a total of 228 chemotherapy cycles (median: 5, range: 1~12) were administered. Twenty-nine patients (69%) received FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy as a third-(50%) or fourth-line (19%) treatment. On the intent-to-treat analysis, 9 patients (21%) achieved a partial response, which was maintained for 4.6 months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 months and 6.2 months, respectively. The frequently encountered toxicities were neutropenia and gastrointestinal side effects, including anorexia. Although there was one possible treatment-related death, the toxicity profiles were generally predictable and manageable.

Conclusion

Salvage chemotherapy with FOLFOX-4 is an effective and tolerable regimen for those heavily pretreated AGC patients who have a good performance status.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Strategic Developments in Polymer-Functionalized Liposomes for Targeted Colon Cancer Therapy: An Updated Review of Clinical Trial Data and Future Horizons
    Satyam Sharma, Moitrai Chakraborty, Dharmendra Yadav, Aniket Dhullap, Raghuraj Singh, Rahul Kumar Verma, Sankha Bhattacharya, Sanjiv Singh
    Biomacromolecules.2024; 25(9): 5650.     CrossRef
  • Serum Mass Spectrometry Proteomics and Protein Set Identification in Response to FOLFOX-4 in Drug-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma
    Domenico D’Arca, Leda Severi, Stefania Ferrari, Luca Dozza, Gaetano Marverti, Fulvio Magni, Clizia Chinello, Lisa Pagani, Lorenzo Tagliazucchi, Marco Villani, Gianluca d’Addese, Isabella Piga, Vincenza Conteduca, Lorena Rossi, Giorgia Gurioli, Ugo De Gior
    Cancers.2023; 15(2): 412.     CrossRef
  • Melatonin as an adjuvant treatment modality with doxorubicin [Biochimie 200 (2022) 1–7]
    Parisa Maleki Dana, Fatemeh Sadoughi, Russel J. Reiter, Sotoudeh Mohammadi, Zahra Heidar, Masoumeh Mirzamoradi, Zatollah Asemi
    Biochimie.2022; 200: 1.     CrossRef
  • Melatonin as an adjuvant treatment modality with doxorubicin
    Parisa Maleki Dana, Fatemeh Sadoughi, Russel J. Reiter, Sotoudeh Mohammadi, Zahra Heidar, Masoumeh Mirzamoradi, Zatollah Asemi
    Biochimie.2022; 202: 49.     CrossRef
  • A Phase I Study of Pevonedistat Plus Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Platinum (NCCH-1811)
    Hirokazu Shoji, Daisuke Takahari, Hiroki Hara, Kengo Nagashima, Jun Adachi, Narikazu Boku
    Future Science OA.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Design principles of drug combinations for chemotherapy
    Debra Wu, Anusha Pusuluri, Douglas Vogus, Vinu Krishnan, C. Wyatt Shields, Jayoung Kim, Amaya Razmi, Samir Mitragotri
    Journal of Controlled Release.2020; 323: 36.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies
    Seiichiro Mitani, Shigenori Kadowaki, Azusa Komori, Chihiro Kondoh, Isao Oze, Kyoko Kato, Toshiki Masuishi, Kazunori Honda, Yukiya Narita, Hiroya Taniguchi, Masashi Ando, Tsutomu Tanaka, Masahiro Tajika, Kei Muro
    Advances in Therapy.2020; 37(6): 2853.     CrossRef
  • The role of curcumin/curcuminoids during gastric cancer chemotherapy: A systematic review of non-clinical study
    Masoud Najafi, Keywan Mortezaee, Mahban Rahimifard, Bagher Farhood, Hamed Haghi-Aminjan
    Life Sciences.2020; 257: 118051.     CrossRef
  • Potential therapeutic effects of curcumin in gastric cancer
    Nastaran Barati, Amir A. Momtazi‐Borojeni, Muhammed Majeed, Amirhossein Sahebkar
    Journal of Cellular Physiology.2019; 234(3): 2317.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Patterns and Changes in Quality of Life during First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Jin Won Kim, Jong Gwang Kim, Byung Woog Kang, Ik-Joo Chung, Young Seon Hong, Tae-You Kim, Hong Suk Song, Kyung Hee Lee, Dae Young Zang, Yoon Ho Ko, Eun-Kee Song, Jin Ho Baek, Dong‐Hoe Koo, So Yeon Oh, Hana Cho, Keun-Wook Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 223.     CrossRef
  • Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan
    Chihiro Kondoh, Shigenori Kadowaki, Azusa Komori, Yukiya Narita, Hiroya Taniguchi, Takashi Ura, Masashi Ando, Kei Muro
    Gastric Cancer.2018; 21(6): 1050.     CrossRef
  • Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving third-line chemotherapy: A population-based outcomes study
    In Sil Choi, Mihong Choi, Ju Hyun Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Koung Jin Suh, Ji Yun Lee, Beodeul Kang, Ji-Won Kim, Se-Hyun Kim, Jin Won Kim, Jeong-Ok Lee, Yu Jung Kim, Soo-Mee Bang, Jong Seok Lee, Keun-Wook Lee, Ju-Seog Lee
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(6): e0198544.     CrossRef
  • A population-based outcomes study of patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy: A nationwide health insurance database study
    In Sil Choi, Jee Hyun Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Koung Jin Suh, Ji Yun Lee, Ji-Won Kim, Se-Hyun Kim, Jin Won Kim, Jeong-Ok Lee, Yu Jung Kim, Soo-Mee Bang, Jong Seok Lee, Keun-Wook Lee, Ju-Seog Lee
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(10): e0205853.     CrossRef
  • Oxaliplatin plus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) as a salvage chemotherapy in heavily-pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
    Vincenza Conteduca, Giorgia Gurioli, Lorena Rossi, Emanuela Scarpi, Cristian Lolli, Giuseppe Schepisi, Alberto Farolfi, Delia De Lisi, Valentina Gallà, Salvatore Luca Burgio, Cecilia Menna, Andrea Amadori, Lorena Losi, Dino Amadori, Maria Paola Costi, Ugo
    BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relationship between insulin-like growth factor axis gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX
    Sung Yong Oh, Aesun Shin, Seong-Geun Kim, Jung-Ah Hwang, Seung Hyun Hong, Yeon-Su Lee, Hyuk-Chan Kwon
    Oncotarget.2016; 7(21): 31204.     CrossRef
  • Influence of ERCC1 and ERCC4 polymorphisms on response to prognosis in gastric cancer treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy
    Zheng-mao Lu, Tian-hang Luo, Ming-ming Nie, Guo-en Fang, Li-ye Ma, Xu-chao Xue, Guo Wei, Chong-we Ke, Jian-wei Bi
    Tumor Biology.2014; 35(4): 2941.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy
    Suee Lee, Sung Yong Oh, Sung Hyun Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Min Chan Kim, Ki Han Kim, Hyo-Jin Kim
    BMC Cancer.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The relationship of Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX: VEGF polymorphism in gastric cancer
    Sung Yong Oh, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Sung Hyun Kim, Suee Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Jung-Ah Hwang, Seung Hyun Hong, Christian A Graves, Kevin Camphausen, Hyo-Jin Kim, Yeon-Su Lee
    BMC Cancer.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Serum Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFOX Chemotherapy
    Sung Yong Oh, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Sung Hyun Kim, Suee Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Christian A. Graves, Kevin Camphausen, Hyo-Jin Kim
    Chemotherapy.2012; 58(6): 426.     CrossRef
  • Modified FOLFOX-6 Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Fluorouracil, Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Taxanes: A Retrospective Study
    K. Tsuji, H. Yasui, Y. Onozawa, N. Boku, H. Doyama, A. Fukutomi, K. Yamazaki, N. Machida, A. Todaka, H. Taniguchi, T. Tsushima, T. Yokota
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2012; 42(8): 686.     CrossRef
  • The clinical research of elemene emulsion combined with FOLFOX4 regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
    Yanzhi Bi, Dongxiang Zeng, Yang Ling
    The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology.2012; 11(6): 336.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of pretreatment metabolic activity measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer: the maximal SUV of the stomach is a prognostic factor
    Jun Chul Park, Jae-Hoon Lee, Kungseok Cheoi, Hyunsoo Chung, Mi Jin Yun, Hyuk Lee, Sung Kwan Shin, Sang Kil Lee, Yong Chan Lee
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2012; 39(7): 1107.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the Toxicities and Efficacies of the Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Who Achieved Complete Response after Chemotherapy
    Yun Jeung Kim, Pyung Gohn Goh, Eui Sik Kim, Su Youn Lee, Hee Seok Moon, Eaum Seok Lee, Jae Kyu Sung, Seok Hyun Kim, Byung Seok Lee, Hyun Yong Jeong
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2011; 58(6): 311.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Therapies for Gastric Cancer
    Jaclyn Yoong, Michael Michael, Trevor Leong
    Drugs.2011; 71(11): 1367.     CrossRef
  • Evolving Standards of Care in Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, Patrick Dufour
    Future Oncology.2011; 7(12): 1441.     CrossRef
  • 12,126 View
  • 122 Download
  • 25 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP