Jae Sik Kim, Kyubo Kim, Wonguen Jung, Kyung Hwan Shin, Seock-Ah Im, Hee-Jun Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jee Suk Chang, Jee Hyun Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon Hee Park, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Byung Ock Choi, Sea-Won Lee, Suzy Kim, Jeanny Kwon, Ki Mun Kang, Woong-Ki Chung, Kyung Su Kim, Ji Ho Nam, Won Sup Yoon, Jin Hee Kim, Jihye Cha, Yoon Kyeong Oh, In Ah Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(4):1121-1129. Published online December 31, 2021
Purpose We aimed to investigate manifestations and patterns of care for patients with brain metastasis (BM) from breast cancer (BC) and compared their overall survival (OS) from 2005 through 2014 in Korea.
Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 600 BC patients with BM diagnosed between 2005 and 2014. The median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. We categorized the patients into three groups according to the year when BM was initially diagnosed (group I [2005-2008], 98 patients; group II [2009-2011], 200 patients; and group III [2012-2014], 302 patients).
Results Over time, the median age at BM diagnosis increased by 2.2 years (group I, 49.0 years; group II, 48.3 years; and group III, 51.2 years; p=0.008). The percentage of patients with extracranial metastasis was 73.5%, 83.5%, and 86.4% for group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.011). The time interval between BC and BM was prolonged in patients with stage III primary BC (median, 2.4 to 3 years; p=0.029). As an initial brain-directed treatment, whole-brain radiotherapy alone decreased from 80.0% in 2005 to 41.1% in 2014. Meanwhile, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone increased from 13.3% to 34.7% during the same period (p=0.005). The median OS for group I, II, and III was 15.6, 17.9, and 15.0 months, respectively, with no statistical significance.
Conclusion The manifestations of BM from BC and the pattern of care have changed from 2005 to 2014 in Korea. However, the OS has remained relatively unchanged over the 10 years.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1–4 vs. 5–10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16–12) Jae Sik Kim, Kyubo Kim, Wonguen Jung, Kyung Hwan Shin, Seock-Ah Im, Hee-Jun Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jee Suk Chang, Jee Hyun Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon Hee Park, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Byung Ock Choi, Sea-Won Lee, Suzy Kim, Jeanny Kwon, Ki Mun Kang, Woong-Ki C Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 200(1): 37. CrossRef
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of curative radiotherapy alone in the treatment of uterine cervical carcinomas, by a retrospective analysis with respects to survival and pelvic control, and to find any risk factors of failure MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Jan. 1990 and Dec. 1995, a total of 187 patients, diagnosed with uterine cervical carcinomas in FIGO stages greater than IA, were treated by curative radiotherapy alone with no chemotherapy. The ages of the patients ranged from 26 to 80 years, with a median of 60 years. The number of patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas were 183 (97.9%). The number of patients with FIGO stage IB1, IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA were 61 (32.6%), 7 (3.7%), 43 (23.0%), 62 (33.3%), 3 (1.6%), 7 (3.7%) and 4 (2.1%), respectively. External radiotherapy was performed with 6 MV or 10 MV X-rays, with a dose range of 19.8 Gy~ 50.4 Gy (median; 30.6), to whole pelvis.
Intracavitary radiation (ICR) was then performed using a high-dose rate remote controlled afterloader with radioisotopes of Co-60 and Cs-137. The fraction size of the ICR was 5 Gy twice a week, and was delivered up to total doses of 10 Gy~ 55 Gy (median; 40). After the ICR, additional pelvic external radiotherapy with midline shielding width of 4 cm was performed with the dose range of 0~30.6 Gy (median; 19.8), and the resultant total doses of A points ranged between 49.8 Gy and 86.0 Gy (median; 70.6). RESULTS The five-year overall survival rates of FIGO IB1, IB2, IIA, IIB, III and IVA were 88.3%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 65.2%, 60.0% and 50.0%, respectively (p=0.005). The pelvic control rates of each stage were 90.1%, 85.7%, 86.1%, 69.4%, 68.6% and 50.0%, respectively (p=0.03). From the multivariate analysis, the radiation response and tumor diameter were found to be significant factors affecting the overall survival. The significant factors influencing pelvic control were the radiation response and pre-treatment hemoglobin level. CONCLUSION The radiation response and tumor diameter were significant factors affecting survival, so patients with tumor diameters greater than 4 cm should be considered for a combined modality, such as concurrent chemoradiotherapy.