Purpose
Exercise is an effective non-pharmacological approach for alleviating treatment-related adverse effects and enhancing physical fitness in breast cancer survivors. A Kinect-based mixed reality device (KMR), with real-time feedback and user data collection, is an innovative exercise intervention for breast cancer survivors. This study aimed to investigate the effect of KMR exercise program on quality of life (QOL) and physical function in breast cancer survivors.
Materials and Methods
Seventy-seven participants were randomly assigned to either the KMR exercise group or home stretching group with an 8-week intervention. Physical function (shoulder range of motion [ROM], body composition, aerobic capacity, and hand grip strength) was evaluated before and after the intervention period. Participants completed questionnaires such as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) to assess upper extremity disabilities, QOL, and physical activity levels.
Results
Significant group-by-time interaction was found for flexion of the operated arm (154.3±12.5 to 165.8±11.2), and the non-operated arm (158.2±13.8 to 166.5±12.2), abduction of the non-operated arm (154.8±31.6 to 161.1±28.1), and adduction of the operated arm (46.5±9.1 to 52.6±7.2). Significant improvements were also observed in DASH (46.8±9.1 to 40.8±9.3) and IPAQ (1136.3±612.8 to 1287±664.1).
Conclusion
The KMR exercise program effectively improved the physical function, alleviated edema, reduced upper extremity disability, and enhanced the QOL in breast cancer survivors. Coupled with significant group-by-time interactions for various outcomes, the results emphasize the potential benefits of incorporating the KMR exercise program to improve the QOL in breast cancer survivors.
Purpose
Survival of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patient remains unknown and varies greatly from person to person. Thus, we aimed to construct a nomogram to quantify the survival probability of patients with MBC.
Materials and Methods
We had included 793 MBC patients and calculated trends of case fatality rate by Kaplan-Meier method and joinpoint regression. Six hundred thirty-four patients with MBC between January 2004 and July 2011 and 159 patients with MBC between August 2011 and July 2013 were assigned to training cohort and internal validation cohort, respectively. We constructed the nomogram based on the results of univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses in the training cohort and validated the nomogram in the validation cohort. Concordance index and calibration curves were used to assess the effectiveness of nomogram.
Results
Case fatality rate of MBC was increasing (annual percentage change [APC], 21.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 46.3; p < 0.05) in the first 18 months and then decreased (APC, ‒4.5; 95% CI, ‒8.2 to ‒0.7; p < 0.05). Metastasis-free interval, age, metastasis location, and hormone receptor status were independent prognostic factors and were included in the nomogram, which had a concordance index of 0.69 in the training cohort and 0.67 in the validation cohort. Calibration curves indicated good consistency between the two cohorts at 1 and 3 years.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the fatality risk of MBC was increasing and reached the summit between 13th and 18th month afterthe detection of MBC. We have developed and validated a nomogram to predict the 1- and 3-year survival probability in MBC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging in Risk Prediction: Recommendations for Data Acquisition, Technical Performance Assessment, and Model Development and Validation Erich P. Huang, Gene Pennello, Nandita M. deSouza, Xiaofeng Wang, Andrew J. Buckler, Paul E. Kinahan, Huiman X. Barnhart, Jana G. Delfino, Timothy J. Hall, David L. Raunig, Alexander R. Guimaraes, Nancy A. Obuchowski Academic Radiology.2023; 30(2): 196. CrossRef
Development and validation of nomograms to predict survival in patients with invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast Yixin Cheng, Pengkun Zhang, Yulin Huang, Zhihui Zhang, Ru Tang, Feng Chi, Jia-Yuan Sun, Zhenyu He BMJ Open.2023; 13(2): e065312. CrossRef
Developing and validating nomograms for predicting the survival in patients with clinical local-advanced gastric cancer Chong Hou, Fangxu Yin, Yipin Liu Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and validation of a risk stratification nomogram for predicting prognosis in bone metastatic breast cancer Niuniu Hou, Jun Yi, Zhe Wang, Lu Yang, Ying Wu, Meiling Huang, Guangdong Hou, Rui Ling Medicine.2021; 100(6): e24751. CrossRef
A Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Population-Based Study Yu Xiong, Xia Shi, Qi Hu, Xingwei Wu, Enwu Long, Yuan Bian Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Survival in Patients with Breast Ductal Carcinoma in situ with Microinvasion: A Population-Based Study Yi-Zi Zheng, Hong-Bin Qin, Zi-Zheng Li, He-Sheng Jiang, Greg Zhang, Shi-Wei Yang, Xian-Ming Wang, Yang-Chun Xu, Zhen-Han Deng, Guo-Wen Liu Clinical Epidemiology.2021; Volume 13: 1095. CrossRef
The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl-b Predicts Favorable Prognosis in Breast Cancer Xiuming Liu, Yuee Teng, Xin Wu, Zhi Li, Bowen Bao, Yunpeng Liu, Xiujuan Qu, Lingyun Zhang Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic Factors for Premenopausal Women with Distant Metastatic Breast Cancer Jeungho Seung, Jai Min Ryu, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Byung Joo Chae, Seok Won Kim Journal of Breast Disease.2020; 8(1): 1. CrossRef
Primary 21-Gene Recurrence Score and Disease Outcome in Loco-Regional and Distant Recurrent Breast Cancer Patients Yujie Lu, Yiwei Tong, Jiahui Huang, Lin Lin, Jiayi Wu, Xiaochun Fei, Ou Huang, Jianrong He, Li Zhu, Weiguo Chen, Yafen Li, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Independent risk factors evaluation for overall survival and cancer-specific survival in thyroid cancer patients with bone metastasis Yuexin Tong, Zhangheng Huang, Chuan Hu, Changxing Chi, Meng Lv, Pengfei Li, Chengliang Zhao, Youxin Song Medicine.2020; 99(36): e21802. CrossRef
A nomogram for predicting survival in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study Wen Zhao, Lei Wu, Andi Zhao, Mi Zhang, Qi Tian, Yanwei Shen, Fan Wang, Biyuan Wang, Le Wang, Ling Chen, Xiaoai Zhao, Danfeng Dong, Lingxiao Zhang, Jin Yang BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Establishing a predicted model to evaluate prognosis for initially diagnosed metastatic Her2-positive breast cancer patients and exploring the benefit from local surgery Hong Lin, Yanxuan Wu, Guoxi Liang, Liming Chen, Anna Sapino PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0242155. CrossRef
Predictors of time to death after distant recurrence in breast cancer patients Victoria Sopik, Ping Sun, Steven A. Narod Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 173(2): 465. CrossRef
Prognostic nomogram for patients with non-metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer in a prospective cohort Chuanxu Luo, Xiaorong Zhong, Zhu Wang, Yu Wang, Yanping Wang, Ping He, Qian Peng, Hong Zheng The International Journal of Biological Markers.2019; 34(1): 41. CrossRef
B2 Prognostic Score: External Validation of a Clinical Decision-making Tool for Metastatic Breast Cancer Tanja Nadine Stueber, Manfred Wischnewsky, Elena Leinert, Joachim Diessner, Catharina Bartmann, Roland Gregor Stein, Achim Woeckel Clinical Breast Cancer.2019; 19(5): 333. CrossRef
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Male Patients With Breast Cancer Siying Chen, Yang Liu, Jin Yang, Qingqing Liu, Haisheng You, Yalin Dong, Jun Lyu Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Could local surgery improve survival in de novo stage IV breast cancer? Zhenchong Xiong, Guangzheng Deng, Jin Wang, Xing Li, Xinhua Xie, Zeyu Shuang, Xi Wang BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub] CrossRef