Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Tae-Won Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Clinical Characteristics of and Treatment Pattern for EGFR-Amplified Colorectal Cancer
Seong-Eun Kim, Hyehyun Jeong, Sun Young Kim, Jeong Eun Kim, Yong Sang Hong, Deokhoon Kim, Jihun Kim, Ji Sung Lee, Tae-Won Kim
Received June 17, 2024  Accepted January 7, 2025  Published online January 10, 2025  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.569    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
To compare clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on EGFR amplification status.
Materials and Methods
Patients with mCRC who underwent next-generation sequencing using a targeted 244-gene panel from 2016 to 2021 were identified and screened for EGFR copy numbers. Cases with at least 5 copies were reviewed for tumor purity adjustment, and those with an adjusted copy number of ≥6 were defined as EGFR-amplified (EGFR amp+). Their clinical characteristics were compared with those without EGFR amplification (EGFR amp-).
Results
Among 2,421 patients, 35 (1.4%) were EGFR amp+. Clinical characteristics did not significantly differ according to EGFR amplification status, but EGFR amp+ cases had fewer instances of peritoneal seeding (8.6% vs. 21.8%). Overall survival (OS) tended to be better in EGFR amp+ patients compared with EGFR amp- patients (median OS 76 vs. 37 months, p=0.15). Among 572 patients who received anti-EGFR antibody-based chemotherapy (anti-EGFR CTx) during disease course, mOS tended to be better in 16 EGFR amp+ patients (79 months) compared with 556 EGFR amp- patients (39 months, p=0.048). Seven out of 35 EGFR amp+ patients were treated with front-line anti-EGFR CTx, and their progression-free survival did not differ from that of EGFR amp- patients treated with front-line anti-EGFR CTx (20 vs. 14 months, p=0.344).
Conclusion
This study may suggest a favorable predictive impact of EGFR amplification in patients treated with anti-EGFR CTx. However, the benefit of front-line anti-EGFR antibody treatment in this group was not notable.
  • 389 View
  • 35 Download
Close layer
Efficacy and Safety Study of Docetaxel as Salvage Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Failing Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum Combination Chemotherapy
Jae-Lyun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Heung Moon Chang, Tae-Won Kim, Jeong Hwan Yook, Sung Tae Oh, Byung Sik Kim, Jung Shin Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37(4):201-207.   Published online August 31, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2005.37.4.201
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

Fluoropyrimidine (F) and platinum (P) combination chemotherapy has been widely used for the first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Docetaxel (D) has shown promising activity in this disease. The present study retrospectively investigated the efficacy of D monotherapy as salvage chemotherapy for AGC that is failing F and P combination chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

A total of 34 patients, fitting the eligibility criteria, were included in this study. D was administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks, with dexamethasone prophylaxis. Twenty-nine patients had measurable lesions. The median treatment-free interval was 38.5 days, and 91.2% of patients had progressed within 4 months of withdrawal of the first line chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 133 cycles of D were administered, with a median of 3.5 (1~8) cycles. From an intention-to-treat analysis, 6 patients achieved partial responses (PR), with a response rate of 20.7% (95% CI, 6.0~35.4). The duration of objective PRs in these six were 2.3+, 2.5+, 2.9, 3.0+, 6.2 and 6.8 months, respectively. Six patients showed a stable disease, but 15 showed progression. The median time to progression was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.8~5.5), with a median overall survival since the start of D monotherapy of 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.5~11.3). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 12.9% of patients and 3.1% of cycles. The incidence of grade 3 or worse non-hematological toxicities were as follows; peripheral sensory neuropathy 9.7%, asthenia 3.2% and allergic reaction 2.7%.

Conclusion

Docetaxel, 75 mg/m2, is active in AGC as second-line chemotherapy after failure of prior exposure to the F and P combination chemotherapy, with a favorable toxicity profile.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of adverse events following injection of original or generic docetaxel for the treatment of breast cancer
    Nao Tagawa, Erika Sugiyama, Masataka Tajima, Yasutsuna Sasaki, Seigo Nakamura, Hiromi Okuyama, Hisanori Shimizu, Vilasinee Hirunpanich Sato, Tadanori Sasaki, Hitoshi Sato
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2017; 80(4): 841.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab-based Therapy in Combination with Different Chemotherapeutic Regimens in Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer – a Single Cancer-center Experience
    Georg-Martin Haag, Leonidas Apostolidis, Dirk Jaeger
    Tumori Journal.2014; 100(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous Aflibercept in Combination with Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
    Nicolas Isambert, Gilles Freyer, Sylvie Zanetta, Benoît You, Pierre Fumoleau, Claire Falandry, Laure Favier, Sylvie Assadourian, Karen Soussan-Lazard, Samira Ziti-Ljajic, Veronique Trillet-Lenoir
    Clinical Cancer Research.2012; 18(6): 1743.     CrossRef
  • A phase II study of docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer after failure of fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination chemotherapy
    Jae-Lyun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu, Heung Moon Chang, Tae-Won Kim, Jeong Hwan Yook, Sung Tae Oh, Byung Sik Kim, Minsun Kim, Young Joo Chun, Jung Shin Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2008; 61(4): 631.     CrossRef
  • 9,952 View
  • 54 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP