Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
12 "Sung Bae Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
In Hae Park, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Sung Bae Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Joo Seop Chung, Soo Hyeon Lee, Tae You Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Eun Kyung Cho, Yang Soo Kim, Hong Suk Song, Jae Hong Seo, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sun Ah Lee, So Young Yoon, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Si Young Kim, Mi Ryung Jin, Jungsil Ro
Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(3):569-577.   Published online September 12, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.289
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL–free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol).
Materials and Methods
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).
Results
The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m2 (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m2 (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (pnon-inferiority=0.021, psuperiority=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments.
Conclusion
Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Overcoming resistance: targeted nanomedicine solutions for cancer therapy
    Bhaveshkumar Patel, Ankur Vashi, Akhilesh Kumar Kuril, Praveen Kumar Subbappa, Ramakrishna Borra
    Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition.2026; 37(6): 1193.     CrossRef
  • Innovations in targeted drug delivery: From nanotechnology to clinical applications
    Akash Srivastava, Asad Ahmad, Shaiber Siddiqui, Anas Islam
    Next Nanotechnology.2026; 9: 100336.     CrossRef
  • Regulatory framework for polymer-based nanotherapeutics in clinical translation
    Federico Stucchi, Min Li, Giuseppe Castellano, Francesco Cellesi
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Polymer Micelles for Cancer Therapy: From Conventional to Smart Delivery Systems
    Rayna Georgieva Bryaskova, Krasimir Georgiev Staykov, Damyan Stoyanov Ganchev
    Pharmaceutics.2026; 18(2): 177.     CrossRef
  • The Current Landscape of Nanopaclitaxel Formulations and the Benefits of Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel in Solid Tumors
    Vaibhav Choudhary, Nirmal Raut, Gajanan Panchal, Maneesha Khalse, Kamlesh Patel
    Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical advances and challenges of antibody-mediated targeted drug delivery in breast cancer therapeutics
    Mokhtar Rejili
    Discover Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent paclitaxel formulation strategies: expanding the therapeutic index by addressing biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations
    Jihoon Lee, Min-Koo Choi, Im-Sook Song
    Archives of Pharmacal Research.2026; 49(4): 500.     CrossRef
  • Personalized Nanomedicine: Integrating Molecular Stratification with Engineered Delivery Systems
    Segev Sharon, Gayatri Mainkar, Lior Zangi
    Journal of Nanotheranostics.2026; 7(2): 9.     CrossRef
  • In vitro Anticancer Activity of Flaxseed Oil Loaded-Polymeric Micelles in Breast Cancer Cell Line
    Eda Nur Yetiskin Morkan, Maria Daaboul, Shifa Alhamvi, Gulsah Akbas, Banu Mansuroglu, Murat Topuzogullari
    Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disrupting the metastatic cascade: nanoparticle-based innovations in antimetastatic therapy
    Tamara Meňhertová, Martina Raudenská, Michal Masařík, Michaela Fojtů
    Nanoscale Horizons.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Revolutionizing cancer treatment: ROS-induced apoptosis via nanoformulated alkaloids
    Swathi Putta, Santhosh Kumar Chinnaiyan, Ramadevi Korni, Venkata Radha Gadela
    Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology.2025; 104: 106556.     CrossRef
  • A drug-eluting balloon catheter coated with chitosan and paclitaxel-loaded poloxamer-stabilized PLA microparticles for the effective treatment of cholangiocarcinoma
    Jin Sil Lee, Jaehee Jang, Hyeryeon Oh, Eunhye Lee, Don Haeng Lee, Panmo Son, Daekyung Sung, Won Il Choi
    Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.2025; 150: 357.     CrossRef
  • Nanomicellar Prodrug Delivery of Glucose-Paclitaxel: A Strategy to Mitigate Paclitaxel Toxicity
    Didi Yan, Xinyue Ma, Yixin Hu, Guogang Zhang, Beibei Hu, Bo Xiang, Xiaokun Cheng, Yongshuai Jing, Xi Chen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2025; Volume 20: 2087.     CrossRef
  • Emerging phytochemical-based nanocarriers: redefining the perspectives of breast cancer therapy
    Gulshan Sharma, Rohil Panwar, Sanskriti Saini, Hardeep Singh Tuli, Karan Wadhwa, Rakesh Pahwa
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.2025; 398(9): 11199.     CrossRef
  • Integrating Nanoparticles and Herbal Extracts with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Enhanced Efficacy and Reduced Toxicity (A Review)
    Palash Chandra Biswas, Vikash Jakhmola, Arnab Samanta, Anandi Kapri, Arif Nur Muhammad Ansori, Rahadian Zainul
    Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal.2025; 59(2): 159.     CrossRef
  • Clinical cancer nanomedicines
    Roger M. Pallares, Roman A. Barmin, Alec Wang, Fabian Kiessling, Twan Lammers
    Journal of Controlled Release.2025; 385: 113991.     CrossRef
  • Advances in paclitaxel nanoformulations: A systematic review of in vivo therapeutic efficacy and safety enhancements
    Salma Seyam, Batoul Alallam, Nurdianah Harif Fadzilah, Erazuliana Abd Kadir
    Journal of Controlled Release.2025; 385: 114036.     CrossRef
  • Poly (ortho esters) (POEs) as cutting-edge biodegradable polymers for targeted cancer treatment and overcoming multidrug resistance
    Devansh Shah, Sankha Bhattacharya
    Biomedical Materials.2025; 20(4): 042004.     CrossRef
  • Paclitaxel-based strategy as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer: a model-based economic evaluation for China
    Ji-Sheng Chen, Jia Hu, Meng-Ting Li
    Future Oncology.2025; 21(23): 3005.     CrossRef
  • Nanocarrier-based insulin delivery: A leap towards a needle-free future
    Saranya Balasubramaniyam, Thirumalaikumaran Rathinam, Mohanakrishnan Srinivasan, Sowmiya Jayarani
    Nano TransMed.2025; 4: 100093.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology-enhanced phytomedicines: Innovations and applications in cancer therapy
    Rajesh Kumar, Seetha Harilal, Swati Arora, Swati Mohanty, Sumit Sheoran, Jyoti Sangwan, Divya Kanojiya, Ankita Acharya, Trideep Saikla
    International Immunopharmacology.2025; 166: 115537.     CrossRef
  • Smart pH-Responsive polymers in biomedical Applications: Nanoparticles, hydrogels, and emerging hybrid platforms
    Giuseppe Nunziata, Domenico Pollonio, Elisa Lacroce, Filippo Rossi
    Materials Today Chemistry.2025; 49: 103063.     CrossRef
  • Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
    Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-pyo Kim
    JAMA Network Open.2025; 8(10): e2534560.     CrossRef
  • Advances in PCL, PLA, and PLGA-Based Technologies for Anticancer Drug Delivery
    Yeongbeom Kim, Jaewoo Kwak, Minyeong Lim, Su Yeon Lim, Sehyun Chae, Suk-Jin Ha, Young-Wook Won, Hyun-Ouk Kim, Kwang Suk Lim
    Pharmaceutics.2025; 17(10): 1354.     CrossRef
  • From Conventional to Next-Generation Strategies: Recent Advances in Polymeric Micelle Preparation for Drug Delivery
    Suhyeon Cho, Morteza Rasoulianboroujeni, Rae Hyung Kang, Glen S. Kwon
    Pharmaceutics.2025; 17(10): 1360.     CrossRef
  • Navigating Cancer Treatment: A Journey from 2D to 3D Cancer Models and Nanoscale Therapies
    Navneet Kaur, Mary Jean Savitsky, Annie Scutte, Roshani Mehta, Narjes Dridi, Taiwo Sogbesan, Alexyss Savannah, Damian Lopez, Dazhi Yang, Jamel Ali
    ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science.2025; 8(11): 3773.     CrossRef
  • Beyond nanomicelles and hydrogels: exploring micelle-containing hydrogels as cutting-edge drug delivery system for effective breast cancer treatment
    Ananya Bishnoi, Gunjan Vasant Bonde
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2025; 686: 126307.     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Yu‐Qing Cao, Meng Song, Bing‐jie Xue, Fei‐Yu Wang, Xiang‐Ming Huang, Jie Cao, Ai‐Guo Cao, Xin‐En Huang
    Precision Medical Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Label-Free Analysis Reveals In Vivo Premature Drug Release Governed by Diffusion from Polymeric Micelles
    Jiayi Yao, Jiefang Sun, Xinyi Wang, Haoran Wang, Yuqi Liu, Mingyang Zhao, Xiangjun Meng, Jingkai Gu
    Nano Letters.2025; 25(52): 18132.     CrossRef
  • Administration of Inhibitory Molecules through Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Therapy
    Christian Rafael Quijia, Andreina Quevedo Enríquez, Carlos Daniel Zappia, Roxana Noemí Peroni, Marlus Chorilli
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2024; 31(6): 726.     CrossRef
  • Innovative strategies for effective paclitaxel delivery: Recent developments and prospects
    Sławomir Wileński, Agnieszka Koper, Paulina Śledzińska, Marek Bebyn, Krzysztof Koper
    Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice.2024; 30(2): 367.     CrossRef
  • Effect of zwitterionic sulfobetaine incorporation on blood behaviours, phagocytosis, and in vivo biodistribution of pH-responsive micelles with positive charges
    Chengwei Wang, Hao Liu, Hu Lin, Rui Zhong, Hao Li, Jiaxin Liu, Xianglin Luo, Meng Tian
    Journal of Materials Chemistry B.2024; 12(6): 1652.     CrossRef
  • Reexamining in vivo fate of paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelles
    Shiqi Lin, Yifei Yu, Ercan Wu, Tianhao Ding, Yuxiu Chu, Feng Pan, Yang Yang, Changyou Zhan
    Nano Today.2024; 56: 102255.     CrossRef
  • Functionalized Polymeric Micelles for Targeted Cancer Therapy: Steps from Conceptualization to Clinical Trials
    Ana Serras, Célia Faustino, Lídia Pinheiro
    Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(8): 1047.     CrossRef
  • Polyester nanoparticles delivering chemotherapeutics: Learning from the past and looking to the future to enhance their clinical impact in tumor therapy
    Giuseppe Longobardi, Thomas Lee Moore, Claudia Conte, Francesca Ungaro, Ronit Satchi‐Fainaro, Fabiana Quaglia
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research progress of paclitaxel nanodrug delivery system in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer
    Jia-xin Qiao, Dong-yan Guo, Huan Tian, Zhan-peng Wang, Qiang-qiang Fan, Yuan Tian, Jing Sun, Xiao-fei Zhang, Jun-bo Zou, Jiang-xue Cheng, Fei Luan, Bing-tao Zhai
    Materials Today Bio.2024; 29: 101358.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology in cancer therapeutics, diagnosis, and management
    Disha Hazarika, Sumit Sarma, Priyanka Shankarishan
    BioTechnologia.2024; 105(3): 287.     CrossRef
  • Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis of Porous Biomolecule‐Incorporated Metal‐Organic Frameworks as Efficient Nanocarriers for Anti‐Cancer Drugs
    Trang Thi Thu Nguyen, Bao Quang Gia Le, Vy Tran Hanh Nguyen, Jae‐Hyoung Lee, Ngoc Xuan Dat Mai, Linh Ho Thuy Nguyen, Tan Le Hoang Doan
    ChemistrySelect.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Innovative nanotheranostics: Smart nanoparticles based approach to overcome breast cancer stem cells mediated chemo‐ and radioresistances
    Prithwish Kola, Prasanth Kumar Bhusetty Nagesh, Pritam Kumar Roy, K. Deepak, Rui Luis Reis, Subhas C. Kundu, Mahitosh Mandal
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer metastases: Current and future perspectives
    Mangala Hegde, Nikunj Naliyadhara, Jyothsna Unnikrishnan, Mohammed S. Alqahtani, Mohamed Abbas, Sosmitha Girisa, Gautam Sethi, Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara
    Cancer Letters.2023; 556: 216066.     CrossRef
  • Influence of lung cancer model characteristics on tumor targeting behavior of nanodrugs
    Weixia Xu, Shengmin Yang, Linwei Lu, Qianzhu Xu, Sunyi Wu, Jianfen Zhou, Jiashen Lu, Xingyan Fan, Nana Meng, Yuan Ding, Xudong Zheng, Weiyue Lu
    Journal of Controlled Release.2023; 354: 538.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Breast Cancer: Review of Emerging Nanotherapeutics
    Ranga Dissanayake, Rheal Towner, Marya Ahmed
    Cancers.2023; 15(11): 2906.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Nanopaclitaxel Formulation for Cancer Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials
    Xiangmin Deng, Xiaoqin Huang, Xiaoyan Dong, Genxiang Mao, Wenmin Xing
    Nanomedicine.2023; 18(10): 833.     CrossRef
  • Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer
    João P. N. Silva, Bárbara Pinto, Luís Monteiro, Patrícia M. A. Silva, Hassan Bousbaa
    Pharmaceutics.2023; 15(6): 1653.     CrossRef
  • Nano delivery system for paclitaxel: Recent advances in cancer theranostics
    Na Ying, Sisi Liu, Mengmeng Zhang, Jing Cheng, Linghuan Luo, Jiayi Jiang, Gaofan Shi, Shu Wu, Jun Ji, Haoyuan Su, Hongzhi Pan, Dongdong Zeng
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2023; 228: 113419.     CrossRef
  • Current Perspectives on Paclitaxel: Focus on Its Production, Delivery and Combination Therapy
    Yibin Liu, Fenglan Zhao, Qibao Wang, Qingjie Zhao, Guige Hou, Qingguo Meng
    Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.2023; 23(18): 1780.     CrossRef
  • Current perspectives and trends in nanoparticle drug delivery systems in breast cancer: bibliometric analysis and review
    Sheng Sun, Ye-hui Wang, Xiang Gao, He-yong Wang, Lu Zhang, Na Wang, Chun-mei Li, Shao-quan Xiong
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Paclitaxel prodrug-encapsulated polypeptide micelles with redox/pH dual responsiveness for cancer chemotherapy
    Jinyu Liu, Yanhao Zhang, Chao Liu, Yuhao Jiang, Zihao Wang, Xinsong Li
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2023; 645: 123398.     CrossRef
  • Biodegradable polyester-based nano drug delivery system in cancer chemotherapy: a review of recent progress (2021–2023)
    Zongheng Wang, Miaomiao Xiao, Fangliang Guo, Yue Yan, Hong Tian, Qianshi Zhang, Shuangyi Ren, Liqun Yang
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of triblock copolymeric micelles based on α- and ε-poly(L-lysine): a Cornelian choice
    Franck Marquet, Viorica Patrulea, Gerrit Borchard
    Polymer Journal.2022; 54(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Current understandings and clinical translation of nanomedicines for breast cancer therapy
    Yike Jiang, Ziyi Jiang, Mingzhe Wang, Lan Ma
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 180: 114034.     CrossRef
  • Poly(ϵ-Caprolactone)-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol (PCL-MPEG)-Based Micelles for Drug-Delivery: The Effect of PCL Chain Length on Blood Components, Phagocytosis, and Biodistribution
    Zemin Hou, Wencheng Zhou, Xi Guo, Rui Zhong, Ao Wang, Jiehua Li, Ying Cen, Chao You, Hong Tan, Meng Tian
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2022; Volume 17: 1613.     CrossRef
  • Engineered nanomaterials as an effective tool for HER2+ breast cancer therapy
    Prashant Pandey, Dilip Kumar Arya, Mohan Kumar Ramar, Kumarappan Chidambaram, P.S. Rajinikanth
    Drug Discovery Today.2022; 27(9): 2526.     CrossRef
  • Biophysical Characterization of Interactions between Serum Albumin and Block Copolymer Micelles
    Catherine F. Dial, Richard A. Gemeinhart
    ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.2022; 8(7): 2899.     CrossRef
  • Micelles in Cancer Therapy: An Update on Preclinical and Clinical Status
    Rabia Aqeel, Nidhi Srivastava, Poonam Kushwaha
    Recent Patents on Nanotechnology.2022; 16(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Challenging the fundamental conjectures in nanoparticle drug delivery for chemotherapy treatment of solid cancers
    Juanjuan Yang, Xiaojin Wang, Bingshun Wang, Kinam Park, Karen Wooley, Shiyi Zhang
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2022; 190: 114525.     CrossRef
  • In Vivo Sustained Release of the Retrograde Transport Inhibitor Retro-2.1 Formulated in a Thermosensitive Hydrogel
    Robin Vinck, Laetitia Anvi Nguyen, Mathilde Munier, Lucie Caramelle, Diana Karpman, Julien Barbier, Alain Pruvost, Jean-Christophe Cintrat, Daniel Gillet
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(23): 14611.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Translation of Self‐Assembled Cancer Nanomedicines
    Peng Mi, Kanjiro Miyata, Kazunori Kataoka, Horacio Cabral
    Advanced Therapeutics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From Conventional to Precision Therapy in Canine Mammary Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Guillermo Valdivia, Ángela Alonso-Diez, Dolores Pérez-Alenza, Laura Peña
    Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advanced Biotechnologies: Collections of Plant Cell Cultures As a Basis for Development and Production of Medicinal Preparations
    E. V. Popova, A. V. Nosov, M. V. Titova, D. V. Kochkin, A. A. Fomenkov, I. E. Kulichenko, A. M. Nosov
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.2021; 68(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation
    Xin Luan, Hebao Yuan, Yudong Song, Hongxiang Hu, Bo Wen, Miao He, Huixia Zhang, Yan Li, Feng Li, Pan Shu, Joseph P. Burnett, Nathan Truchan, Maria Palmisano, Manjunath P. Pai, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao, Duxin Sun
    Biomaterials.2021; 275: 120910.     CrossRef
  • Breast cancer: Muscarinic receptors as new targets for tumor therapy
    Alejandro Español, Agustina Salem, Yamila Sanchez, María Elena Sales
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 12(6): 404.     CrossRef
  • Direct Comparison of Analogous Amphiphilic Gradient and Block Polyoxazolines
    Lenka Loukotová, Pavel Švec, Ondřej Groborz, Tomáš Heizer, Hynek Beneš, Helena Raabová, Tereza Bělinová, Vít Herynek, Martin Hrubý
    Macromolecules.2021; 54(17): 8182.     CrossRef
  • Challenges towards Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Nanomedicines
    Muhammad Nadeem Hafeez, Christian Celia, Vilma Petrikaite
    Processes.2021; 9(9): 1527.     CrossRef
  • Drug Delivery of Natural Products Through Nanocarriers for Effective Breast Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Literature
    Kah Min Yap, Mahendran Sekar, Shivkanya Fuloria, Yuan Seng Wu, Siew Hua Gan, Nur Najihah Izzati Mat Rani, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan, Chandrakant Kokare, Pei Teng Lum, M Yasmin Begum, Shankar Mani, Dhanalekshmi Unnikrishnan Meenakshi, Kathiresan V Sathasiva
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2021; Volume 16: 7891.     CrossRef
  • Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study)
    Sung-Bae Kim, Jae Hong Seo, Jin-Hee Ahn, Tae-Yong Kim, Seok Yun Kang, Joohyuk Sohn, Yaewon Yang, Kyong Hwa Park, Yong Wha Moon, Seungtaek Lim, Myoung Joo Kang, Koung Eun Yoon, Hyun Ju Cho, Keun Seok Lee
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Self-assembly of oxidation-responsive polyethylene glycol-paclitaxel prodrug for cancer chemotherapy
    Chengyuan Dong, Quan Zhou, Jiajia Xiang, Fusheng Liu, Zhuxian Zhou, Youqing Shen
    Journal of Controlled Release.2020; 321: 529.     CrossRef
  • Clinical applications of nanomedicine in cancer therapy
    Mohammad Norouzi, Mehrnaz Amerian, Mahshid Amerian, Fatemeh Atyabi
    Drug Discovery Today.2020; 25(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • Improvement of Paclitaxel-Associated Adverse Reactions (ADRs) via the Use of Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis


    Pi-Ling Chou, Ya-Ping Huang, Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Kun-Ming Rau, Yi-Ping Fang
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 1731.     CrossRef
  • Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Adam S. Komorowski, Helen J. MacKay, Rossanna C. Pezo
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(14): 5035.     CrossRef
  • Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges
    Saeid Kargozar, Francesco Baino, Sepideh Hamzehlou, Michael R. Hamblin, Masoud Mozafari
    Chemical Society Reviews.2020; 49(14): 5008.     CrossRef
  • Furry nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization of nanoemulsion-mediated core crosslinked nanoparticles and their robust stability in vivo
    Rena Tanaka, Koichi Arai, Jun Matsuno, Miyo Soejima, Ji Ha Lee, Rintaro Takahashi, Kazuo Sakurai, Shota Fujii
    Polymer Chemistry.2020; 11(27): 4408.     CrossRef
  • Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval
    Duhyeong Hwang, Jacob D. Ramsey, Alexander V. Kabanov
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2020; 156: 80.     CrossRef
  • What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right
    Duxin Sun, Simon Zhou, Wei Gao
    ACS Nano.2020; 14(10): 12281.     CrossRef
  • Synthesis of PCL–PEG–PCL Triblock Copolymer via Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization and Its Application as an Injectable Hydrogel—An Interdisciplinary Learning Trial
    Kaiting Wu, Lin Yu, Jiandong Ding
    Journal of Chemical Education.2020; 97(11): 4158.     CrossRef
  • Phytochemical-Based Nanomedicine for Advanced Cancer Theranostics: Perspectives on Clinical Trials to Clinical Use


    Madhusmita Dhupal, Devasish Chowdhury
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 9125.     CrossRef
  • A Compressive Review about Taxol®: History and Future Challenges
    Julia Gallego-Jara, Gema Lozano-Terol, Rosa Alba Sola-Martínez, Manuel Cánovas-Díaz, Teresa de Diego Puente
    Molecules.2020; 25(24): 5986.     CrossRef
  • Recent Clinical Developments of Nanomediated Drug Delivery Systems of Taxanes for the Treatment of Cancer
    Ruben AG van Eerden, Ron HJ Mathijssen, Stijn LW Koolen
    International Journal of Nanomedicine.2020; Volume 15: 8151.     CrossRef
  • Basic principles of drug delivery systems – the case of paclitaxel
    S. Ezrahi, A. Aserin, N. Garti
    Advances in Colloid and Interface Science.2019; 263: 95.     CrossRef
  • Biomolecules Turn Self-Assembling Amphiphilic Block Co-polymer Platforms Into Biomimetic Interfaces
    Saziye Yorulmaz Avsar, Myrto Kyropoulou, Stefano Di Leone, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Wolfgang P. Meier, Cornelia G. Palivan
    Frontiers in Chemistry.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polyester Nanoparticle Encapsulation Mitigates Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    R. Ganugula, M. Deng, M. Arora, H.-L. Pan, M. N. V. Ravi Kumar
    ACS Chemical Neuroscience.2019; 10(3): 1801.     CrossRef
  • PEGylation of Ginsenoside Rg3-Entrapped Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization, and In Vitro Biological Studies
    Lijun Zhang, Junfeng Hui, Pei Ma, Yu Mi, Daidi Fan, Chenhui Zhu, Lei Chi, Yanan Dong
    Journal of Nanomaterials.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy by formulation approach
    Xiaowei Zang, Jong Bong Lee, Kiran Deshpande, Olga B. Garbuzenko, Tamara Minko, Leonid Kagan
    Journal of Controlled Release.2019; 303: 109.     CrossRef
  • Current status of nanomedicine in the chemotherapy of breast cancer
    A. I. Fraguas-Sánchez, C. Martín-Sabroso, A. Fernández-Carballido, A. I. Torres-Suárez
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2019; 84(4): 689.     CrossRef
  • A Phase II Study of Genexol-PM and Cisplatin as Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Bhumsuk Keam, Keun-Wook Lee, Se-Hoon Lee, Jin-Soo Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Hong-Gyun Wu, Keun-Yong Eom, Suzy Kim, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Seong Keun Kwon, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung, Ji-Won Kim, Dae Seog Heo
    The Oncologist.2019; 24(6): 751.     CrossRef
  • Advances in thermosensitive polymer-grafted platforms for biomedical applications
    Phung Ngan Le, Chan Khon Huynh, Ngoc Quyen Tran
    Materials Science and Engineering: C.2018; 92: 1016.     CrossRef
  • Supramolecular polymeric chemotherapy based on cucurbit[7]uril-PEG copolymer
    Hao Chen, Yueyue Chen, Han Wu, Jiang-Fei Xu, Zhiwei Sun, Xi Zhang
    Biomaterials.2018; 178: 697.     CrossRef
  • pH/NIR-Responsive Polypyrrole-Functionalized Fibrous Localized Drug-Delivery Platform for Synergistic Cancer Therapy
    Arjun Prasad Tiwari, Tae In Hwang, Jung-Mi Oh, Bikendra Maharjan, Sungkun Chun, Beom Su Kim, Mahesh Kumar Joshi, Chan Hee Park, Cheol Sang Kim
    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2018; 10(24): 20256.     CrossRef
  • The Blood Clearance Kinetics and Pathway of Polymeric Micelles in Cancer Drug Delivery
    Xuanrong Sun, Guowei Wang, Hao Zhang, Shiqi Hu, Xin Liu, Jianbin Tang, Youqing Shen
    ACS Nano.2018; 12(6): 6179.     CrossRef
  • Different Nanoformulations Alter the Tissue Distribution of Paclitaxel, Which Aligns with Reported Distinct Efficacy and Safety Profiles
    Feng Li, Huixia Zhang, Miao He, Jinhui Liao, Nianhang Chen, Yan Li, Simon Zhou, Maria Palmisano, Alex Yu, Manjunath P. Pai, Hebao Yuan, Duxin Sun
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2018; 15(10): 4505.     CrossRef
  • Emerging advances in P-glycoprotein inhibitory nanomaterials for drug delivery
    Longfa Kou, Rui Sun, Yangzom D. Bhutia, Qing Yao, Ruijie Chen
    Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery.2018; 15(9): 869.     CrossRef
  • The battle of “nano” paclitaxel
    Alexandros Marios Sofias, Michael Dunne, Gert Storm, Christine Allen
    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overcoming the Road Blocks: Advancement of Block Copolymer Micelles for Cancer Therapy in the Clinic
    Loujin Houdaihed, James C. Evans, Christine Allen
    Molecular Pharmaceutics.2017; 14(8): 2503.     CrossRef
  • PEG-PCL-based nanomedicines: A biodegradable drug delivery system and its application
    Philip Grossen, Dominik Witzigmann, Sandro Sieber, Jörg Huwyler
    Journal of Controlled Release.2017; 260: 46.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thermoresponsive Poly(L-lactic acid)–poly(ethylene glycol) Gel Injection on Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Rat Myocardial Infarction Model
    Shota Somekawa, Atsushi Mahara, Kazunari Masutani, Yoshiharu Kimura, Hiroshi Urakawa, Tetsuji Yamaoka
    Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.2017; 14(5): 507.     CrossRef
  • A versatile nanoplatform for synergistic combination therapy to treat human esophageal cancer
    Xin-shuai Wang, De-jiu Kong, Tzu-yin Lin, Xiao-cen Li, Yoshihiro Izumiya, Xue-zhen Ding, Li Zhang, Xiao-chen Hu, Jun-qiang Yang, She-gan Gao, Kit S Lam, Yuan-pei Li
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.2017; 38(6): 931.     CrossRef
  • 22,230 View
  • 697 Download
  • 100 Web of Science
  • 96 Crossref
Close layer
Growth Suppression and Induction of Chemosensitivity in Human Gallbladder Epithelial Carcinoma Cells (GBCE) by Adenovirus-Mediated Transfer of the Wild-type p53 Gene
Sung Bae Kim, Myung Hwan Kim, Sung Koo Lee, Tae Won Kim, Cheolwon Suh, Jeong Sik Shin, Jung Sun Park, Eun Soon Kim, Gyungyub Gong, Jung Shin Lee, Woo Kun Kim, Sang Hee Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2003;35(6):521-527.   Published online December 31, 2003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2003.35.6.521
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Mutations in the p53 gene are reported in 50~90% of gallbladder and bile duct cancer, and have been implicated in chemoresistance. We undertook this study to determine whether the introduction of the wild type p53 gene into GBCE (human gallbladder cancer cell line with a heterozygous p53 mutation) by an adenoviral vector could increase the sensitivity of the cell to 5-FU, a commonly used drug in the treatment of gallbladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GBCE cells were transfected with either Ad/p53 or Ad/E1 in the presence of 5-FU. Gene expression was confirmed by western blotting. Nude mice were injected subcutaneously with GBCE cells. When tumors formed, intratumoral injection of Ad/p53 was performed. Reduction of tumor size was compared in two weeks of Ad/p53 gene transfection. RESULTS: Ad/53 transfection induced a dose-dependent inhibition of tumor growth. Tumor colony formation was more inhibited with p53 gene transfection than with mock transfection in the presence of 5-FU. The reduction in tumor size was more pronounced with p53 transfection than with mock infection.
CONCLUSION
These treatment modalities could be utilized in the treatment of p53 mutant human gallbladder cancers.
  • 4,696 View
  • 17 Download
Close layer
Retrospective Analysis of the Results of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with 10 or More Positive Nodes: Nonrandomized Comparison of Adriamycin-Containing Regimens
Jin Hee Ahn, Haeseoung Bahng, Jeong Gyun Kim, Sung Bae Kim, Sei Hyun Ahn, Hyesook Chang, Jung Shin Lee, Sang Hee Kim, Woo Kun Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2002;34(2):84-90.   Published online April 30, 2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2002.34.2.84
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To evaluate the results of adriamycin-based adjuvant chemotherapy with or without high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell transplantation (SCT) in breast cancer with 10 or more positive axillary nodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventy-one breast cancer patients who had undergone surgery and had 10 or more positive axillary nodes were included in this study held between January 1997 and December 1999. The pathologic and clinical records were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine patients were treated with adriamycin followed by 8 courses of CMF (group I); 22 patients received 4 courses of adriamycin and 7 patients received 3 courses of adriamycin. Twenty-six patients received median 6 courses of CAF (group II) and 16 patients underwent HDC and autologous SCT (group III). With a median follow-up of 27.1 months, relapses were observed in 24 patients (33.8%) and the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 57.1%; group I/II 55.4%, and group III 62.7%. The three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 86.1%; group I/II 83.0%, group III 93.8%. There were no difference in the 3-year DFSs or in the OSs of group I and group II. However, patients who received only 3 courses of the sequential adriamycin in group I showed a significantly poorer 3-year OS than those that received 4 courses of adriamycin (42.9% vs. 95.5%).
CONCLUSION
Our study shows that adriamycin-containing combination chemotherapy is as effective as HDC with SCT in patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes judging by 3-year DFS and OS, and shows that three courses of adriamycin seems to be inadequate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Alternative Therapy and Abnormal Liver Function During Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients
    Jin-Hee Ahn, Sung-Bae Kim, Mi Ra Yun, Jung-Shin Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang, Woo Kun Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2004; 19(3): 397.     CrossRef
  • 4,936 View
  • 26 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Case Report
A Case of Placental Metastasis from Advanced Gastric Carcinoma
Mi Sook Lee, Sang Hee Kim, Je Hwan Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Cheol Won Suh, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Woo Kun Kim, Sang We Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(3):608-612.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Placental and fetal involvement by matenal malignancy is rare. We report a case of placental metastasis from advanced gastric carcinoma in a 27 year-old woman. The patient also had disseminated bone metastasis, bone marrow involvement, malignant ascites, multiple lymphadenopathy, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Cut surface of the placental body showed many, variable-sized, grayish white nodules and plaques. Light microscopic finding showed sheets of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in intervillous spaces. Villi were not invaded. Despite palliative chemotherapy the patient died of massive gastric cancer bleeding. But the patients child is alive and doing well with age of 11 months. We suggest that the presence of malignancy in pregnancy demands complete evaluation of the placenta and adequate follow-up of the infant for the sign of involvement.
  • 2,823 View
  • 18 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
The Prognostic Significance of the p53 Overexpession on Complete Response and Survival in Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treated Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma
Sung Bae Kim, Sang Hee Kim, Hwoon Yong Jung, Hun Kyung Lee, Gyeong Hoon Kang, Jong Hoon Kim, Ho Young Song, Seung Il Park, Dong Kwan Kim, Hae Ryun Kim, Won Sun Hong, Je Hwan Lee, Sang We Kim, Cheol Won Sun, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Woo Kun Kim, Young Il Min
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(2):278-287.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To determine the frequency of p53 overexpression and to analyse the relationship between p53 overexpression and complete response rate, survival in locoregionl squamous cell esophageal cancers treated with preoperative chemoradiation multimodality approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Using a microwave oven heating method, we have detected p53 overexpression by immunohistochemically with a monoclonal antibody(DO-7) in formalin- fixed paraffin-embedded samples of 42 patients with locoregional squamous cell esophageal cancer, who treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiatian followed by surgery.
RESULTS
In 27 of 42 tumors(64.2%), nuclear immunoreactivity for the p53 protein was detected. Complete response rate, evaluated in surgical specimen 3-4 weeks after chemoradiation seemed to be high in p53 positive group compared to p53 negative group, however, there was no statistically significant difference in acquiring better complete response rate, overall survival and progression free survival between p53 positive and p53 negative group(p=0.0546, p=0.0599, p= 0.6832). Complete response group(n=17) survived longer than non-complete response group(n=25)(p=0.0010).
CONCLUSION
The results indicate that p53 is not a statistically significant prognostic factor in obtaining better complete response rate, overall survival and progression free survival of the patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Additional studies are warranted for further evaluation.
  • 3,029 View
  • 17 Download
Close layer
Adjuvant Chemotherapy with ' 5-Fluorouracil Plus Low - dose Leucovorin Following Surgical Resection of Stage 2 , 3 Colon Cancer
Je Hwan Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jong Soo Choi, Dai Young Zang, Ho Young Pyun, Sung Bae Kim, Sang We Kim, Cheol Won Suh, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Woo Kun Kim, Sang Hee Kim, Jin Cheon Kim, Suk Koo Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1995;27(5):846-857.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Obtivea: About seventy-five percent of the individuals with colon cancer will have a primary surgical resection with the hope of complete tumor eradication. Despite the high resectability rate and a general improvement in therapy, nearly half of all patients with colon cancer still die of metastatic tumor. Over the past three decades, many clinical studies have failed to demonstrate benefits from adjuvant therapy. Recently, new data from several studies have demonstrated delays in tumor recurrence and increases in survival for specific groups of patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effective- ness of 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) and low-dose leucovorin in reducing the recurrence rate and improving the survival of the patients with surgically resected colon cancer in stage II and III. Methods: One hundred and fifty six with surgically resected colon cancer in stage II and 1II from Nov 1989 to Dec 1993 were included in this study and were divided into two groups. First group(LF arm) included eighty five Patients who received combination chemotherapy of '5-FU and low-dose 1eucovorin' following resection of colon cancer, and second group(control arm) included seventy one patients who received only oral UFT or no adjuvant treatment. '5-FU and low-dose leucovorin' chemotherapy consisted of leucovorin 20 mg/m(2), intravenously, plus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2), intravenously, on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Results: I) There were significantly more recurrences and distant failure in control arm than LF arm. 2) The estimated 4-year disease-free survival was 82.5% in LF arm and 59.8% in control arm(p = 0.007). 3) The estimated 4-year overall survival was 94.3% in LF arm and 63.9% in control arm (p = 0.001). 4) The survival differences between LF arm and control arm were significant in stage II and III respectively. 5) Number of metastatic lymph nodes, histologic differentiation, and whether or not pa- tients received 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy, were each found to have prognostic significance. Concluslon: This study strongly suggests that 5-FU and low-dose leucovorin adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in patients with surgically resected stage II and III colon cancer.
  • 3,343 View
  • 16 Download
Close layer
Clinical Trial
High Dose Cyclophosphamide, Thiotepa, and Carboplatin followed by Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Rescue in Patients with Responsive Metastatic or High - Risk Primary Breast Cancer
Se Haeng Cho, Sang Hee Kim, Young Joo Min, Sung Joon Choi, Jung Kyun Kim, Tae Won Kim, Jong Soo Choi, Dai Young Zang, Je Hwan Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Cheol Won Suh, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Woo Kun Kim, Se Hyun Ahn, Jung Mi Park, Sang We Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1998;30(1):100-105.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Positive correlation between dosage of antineoplastic agents and tumor response is well demonstrated in advanced breast cancer. But severe bone marrow depression limit the clinical application of high dose chemotherapy. Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation(PBSCT) after high dose chemotherapy(HDC) was introduced to promote rapid bone marrow recovery. This study was designed to establish the feasibility of combining high dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin chemotherapy followed by stem cell rescue in patients with responsive metastatic or high risk primary breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
Eligibility criteria included the presence of high risk primary breast cancer(10 or more involved axillary lymph node, n=4), recurrent disease after curative resection(n=6) or stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis(n=1). The responses of recurrent disease to initial chemotherapy were 4 complete responses and 1 partial responses. One recurrent case with solitary pulmonary metastasis underwent metastasectomy and got chemotherapy after operation. Colony stimulating factor was administered to mobilize stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood. The stem cell collection was performed 4~10 times(median 4) and the number of collected stem cell was 1.95~7.34x10(8)kg(median 4.87x10(8)/kg). High dose chemotherapy with CTCb (cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m2/day, thiotepa 125 mg/m2/day, carboplatin 200 mg/m2/ day) was performed from day -7 to day -4 and peripheral stem cell infusion was performed on day 0 as planned.
RESULT
Eleven patients were enrolled in this study. Their median age was 39 years old. The median time for bone marrow recovery was 11 days for neutrophil(>500/mm2) and 28 days for platelet(>50,000/mm2). Packed red blood cell and platelet transfusion were performed in 11 patients. The group whose infused mononuclear cell count was less than 4.0 x 10(8)/kg(n=9) needed longer time for bone marrow recovery than those(n=2) who had more than 4.0 x 10(8)/kg( 20 vs 13 day, p < 0.05 ). For non-hematologic toxicity, none have experienced toxicity more than grade III. There were 2 recurrences of 4 cases with high risk breast cancer at the 22 th, and 25 th month but they are still alive at the 28 th, and 29 th month each. The other 2 cases are alive without recurrences at the 18 th, and 20 th months each. In the recurrent disease group, one case who showed partial response to initial chemotherapy recurred at the 4 th month and died at the 13 th month after PBSCT. The other 5 cases are alive without recurrence at the 1st, 3 rd, 3 rd, 5 th, and 31 th month each. One case with stage IV disease(bone metastasis) is alive without evidence of progression at the 3 rd month.
CONCLUSION
High dose chemotherapy with PBSCT can be performed safely. Long term survival of patients with advanced breast cancer would be possible by PBSCT after HDC. Further clinical trials based on larger patient population is required to evaluate clinical efficacy of PBSCT after HDC in high risk and recurrent breast cancer.
  • 3,605 View
  • 18 Download
Close layer
Original Articles
Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Operable Breast Cancer : Survival and Prognostic Factor Analysis
Jeong Gyun Kim, Tae Won Kim, Je Hwan Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Cheolwon Suh, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Sei Hyun Ahn, Hyesook Chang, Sang Hee Kim, Woo Kun Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1999;31(5):1018-1026.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Though the therapy using regimens similar to western countries has been done by medical oncologists in several different centers in Korea, there is no large scale study about the results of those adjuvant chemotherapy as in western country and it is not clear whether the results are same in Korean population as in western countries not only in overall outcome but also depending on various prognostic categories. It is important to review whether Korean patients would have equivalent results as in western countries or not when they were treated with the same standardized regimens. We examined the effect of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy on survival and analyzed prognostic factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors was done in 341 consecutive breast cancer patients who received curative operation followed by systemic conventional adjuvant chemotherapy between 1989 and 1996. The survival rate was compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank method. To evaluate an independent prognostic factors, Cox proportional hazard model was used.
RESULTS
After median follow up of 56 months (range 28 118 months), the mean disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was 81.0+/-2.7 and 91.5+/-2.6 months respectively. The 5-year DFS and OS rate was 61% and 77%, respectively. On univariate analysis, prognostic factors significant for DFS were tumor size (<2 cm vs. > 2 cm), hormonal receptor status, and histologic grade. Prognostic factors affecting both DFS and OS are as follows: age ((pound)40 vs 41-50 vs. (3)51), number of axillary node involvement, .and stage. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of axillary node involvement was the strongest adverse predictor.
CONCLUSION
The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in Korean patients is not different from western countries and this report emphasizes the prognostic importance of number of axillary node involvement in breast cancer patients and necessity of intensive management of those with four or more positive nodes.
  • 3,726 View
  • 17 Download
Close layer
Conventional Treatments in Patients with Hodgkin's Disease
Jong Beom Park, Chul Won Seo, Sang Hee Kim, Kyung No Lee, Hun Ho Song, Soon Seo Park, Hyo Jung Kim, Yung Joo Min, Jin Hee Park, Sung Joon Choe, Jung Koon Kim, Tae Won Kim, Dae Yung Jang, Je Hwan Lee, Sung Bae Kim, Sang Wee Kim, Koo Hyung Lee, Jung Sin Lee, Woo Keon Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1999;31(4):821-829.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We conducted this study to determine the efficacy of conventional treatments for patients with Hodgkin's disease and identify the patients who have poor prognosis and need high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between Jun. 1989 and Dec. 1997, 50 patients were enrolled and 39 patients were evaluable. Patients were treated with radiotherapy (5 patients) or combination chemotherapy (21 patients) or combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (13 patients) according to their disease stage. Chemotherapy regimens were C-MOPP (cyclo- phosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone), MOPP (mechlorethamine, vin- cristine, procarbazine, and prednisone), ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), alternating C-MOPP/ABVD, and MOPP/ABV hybrid. Radiation therapy was performed when there was residual tumor after chemotherapy or bulky disease. The response to treatments was analyzed by clinical stage I-II and stage III-IV patients group, respectively.
RESULTS
The complete response rate was 76.9% for total patients, 83.3% for stage I-II patients, and 71.4% for stage III-IV patients. Of the 30 patients achieving complete response, four (13.3%) relapsed at 6, 12, 22, and 28 months after complete response, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 24 months. Nine patients died. Four patients died of Hodgkins disease. Three-year overall survival rate was 72.9% for total patients, 72.5% for stage I-II patients, and 70% for stage III-IV patients. Two-year disease- free survival rate was 77.6% for total patients, 79% for stage I-II stage patients, and 73.9% for stage III-IV patients. The prognostic factor analysis showed that performance status affected the disease-free survival rate.
CONCLUSION
Conventional treatments in patients with Hodgkins disease showed results comparable to previous studies. But we were unable to identify the patients, who need high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, because of small number of study patients and short follow up duration.
  • 3,482 View
  • 15 Download
Close layer
Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Jin Hee Ahn, He Hwan Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jeong Gyoon Kim, Seong Jun Choi, Sung Bae Kim, Sang We Kim, Cheolwon Suh, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Wo Kun Kim, Hyesook Chang, Snag Hee Kim
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1999;31(3):627-634.
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is defined as lymphoma limited to the cranial-spinal axis without evidence of systemic disease and its incidence has risen threefold during the last fifteen years among apparantly healthy population. This study was intended to analyze the clinicopathologic features and treatment outcome of the patient with PCNSL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty one patients were diagnosed and treated for the PCNSL limited to brain parenchyme at Asan Medical Center between March 1989 and December 1996. We reviewed clinical records of these patients and analyzed clinicopathologic features, treatment response, survival time and prognostic factors.
RESULTS
The ratio of male to female was 1.3: 1 and the most prevalent age group was the 4th decade. Most patients had diffuse large cell (19/21) and B-cell type (8/8). Seventeen (94.4%) among 18 evaluable patients achieved complete remission (CR) as initial response, but 53% of patients showed recurence of the disease. Median times of disease-free and overall survival were 40 and 50 months, respectively and 5 year overall survival rate was 35.3 %. Prognostic factors such as age and performance status, had a statistically significant influence on the overall survival but not on disease-free survival.
CONCLUSION
CR rate of the patients with PCNSL was high, but relapses were frequent. There fore further studies are needed to define the pmgnostic factors and to decrease relapse rate.
  • 3,209 View
  • 17 Download
Close layer
Grnulocyte Colony - Stimulating Factor , Filgrastim ( G - CSF , Filgastrim ) in Acute Leukemia after Remission Induction Chemotherapy
Cheol Won Suh, Sung Bae Kim, Sang Hee Kim, Young Ran Chae, Byoug Soon Doh, Sang We Kim, Myung Ju Ahn, Kyoo Hyung Lee, Jung Shin Lee
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1994;26(3):431-438.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
Colony stimulating factors have been shown to accelerate recovery from severe neutropenia after intensive chemotherapy. To prove its clinical effectiveness, we conducted controlled study to administer G-CSF in acute leukemia after induction chemotherapy. Methods: Forty patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory acute leukemia after remission induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned to one of two groupa (20 G- CSF treated group, 20 control grouP). Treatment with G-CSF(200 ug/m(2)/d) was started 48 hours after the end of chemotherapy and continued until the neutrophil count rose above 1,500 /mm(3). Results: Treatment with G-CSF shortened neutropenic period after chemotherapy, i.e., median duration of neutrophil counts less than 1,000/mm(3) was 21 days in control group and 12 days in G-CSF treated group. The incidence of infection was 80%in control group, 70% in G-CSF treated group, but it did not show any statistically significant difference. Microbiologically documented infection was 40% in control group, 20% in G-CSF treated group. Febrile periods and duration of antibiotic administration were decreased to 7 days and 18 days respectively. In G- CSF treated group, two Patients reported mild bone pain. There was no evidence that G-CSF could increase remission duratian and survival. Conclusion: It appears that recombinant G-CSF is safe and useful in neutropenic patients after intensive chemotherapy, accelerating neutrophil recovery and thereby reducing the incidence of documented infection and duration of antibiotic ad#ministration.
  • 3,495 View
  • 18 Download
Close layer
Effects of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery in Locoreginal Cancer - preliminary report -
Yun Hae Chang, Sung Bae Kim, Sang Hee Kim, Jong SU Choi, Dae Young Chang, Je Whan Lee, Sang We Kim, Cheolwon Suh, Kyon Hung Lee, Jung Shin Lee, Woo Gyun Kim, Ho Young Song, Hye Sook Chang, Hong Hoon K
J Korean Cancer Assoc. 1996;28(4):690-698.
AbstractAbstract PDF
Prognosis of locoregional esophageal cancer treated with conventional surgery or radiotherapy alone has been very poor. In order to improve outcome and determine the efficacy of a combined modality therapy, this prospective study was performed. Between May 1993 and April l995, 44 patients with locoregional esophageal cancer were entered this study. They were treated with 2 courses of 5-FU(DI-5, D30-33) and cisplatin (Dl, D29) plus 48Gy radiation therapy over 4 weeks. 44 patients completed the preoperative reatment. A transhiatal esophagectomy was planned 3~4 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. Clinical response were reevaluable in 43 patients after treatment: 34 patients showed improvement, 5 patients showed stable, 4 patients showed progression. One patient was died of sepsis 1 week after completion of chemotherapy. l8 patients underwent operation after chemoradiation and 9 patients showed complete pathologic response. Grade 3,4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 21% and 7%, respectively. Esophagitis and vomiting were moderate to severe in 43% patients. Median follow-up duration was 7.5months(2-21M), the median survival was not reached. In conclusion, this intensive combined therapy is promising modality with regards to relatively high pathologic complete response rate. Further randomized Jarge scaled study was warrented
  • 3,009 View
  • 15 Download
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP