Se Ik Kim, Minsun Song, Suhyun Hwangbo, Sungyoung Lee, Untack Cho, Ju-Hyun Kim, Maria Lee, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Dae-Shik Suh, Taesung Park, Yong-Sang Song
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1144-1155. Published online November 20, 2018
Purpose
Discovery of models predicting the exact prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is necessary as the first step of implementation of individualized treatment. This study aimed to develop nomograms predicting treatment response and prognosis in EOC.
Materials and Methods
We comprehensively reviewed medical records of 866 patients diagnosed with and treated for EOC at two tertiary institutional hospitals between 2007 and 2016. Patients’ clinico-pathologic characteristics, details of primary treatment, intra-operative surgical findings, and survival outcomes were collected. To construct predictive nomograms for platinum sensitivity, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS), we performed stepwise variable selection by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with leave-one-out cross-validation. For model validation, 10-fold cross-validation was applied.
Results
The median length of observation was 42.4 months (interquartile range, 25.7 to 69.9 months), during which 441 patients (50.9%) experienced disease recurrence. The median value of PFS was 32.6 months and 3-year PFS rate was 47.8% while 5-year OS rate was 68.4%. The AUCs of the newly developed nomograms predicting platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 0.758, 0.841, and 0.805, respectively. We also developed predictive nomograms confined to the patients who underwent primary debulking surgery. The AUCs for platinum sensitivity, 3-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 0.713, 0.839, and 0.803, respectively.
Conclusion
We successfully developed nomograms predicting treatment response and prognosis of patients with EOC. These nomograms are expected to be useful in clinical practice and designing clinical trials.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comprehensive analyses of mitophagy-related genes and mitophagy-related lncRNAs for patients with ovarian cancer Jianfeng Zheng, Shan Jiang, Xuefen Lin, Huihui Wang, Li Liu, Xintong Cai, Yang Sun BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Peripheral and tumor‐infiltrating immune cells are correlated with patient outcomes in ovarian cancer Weiwei Zhang, Yawen Ling, Zhidong Li, Xingchen Peng, Yazhou Ren Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(8): 10045. CrossRef
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using machine learning methods Seung Mi Lee, Suhyun Hwangbo, Errol R. Norwitz, Ja Nam Koo, Ig Hwan Oh, Eun Saem Choi, Young Mi Jung, Sun Min Kim, Byoung Jae Kim, Sang Youn Kim, Gyoung Min Kim, Won Kim, Sae Kyung Joo, Sue Shin, Chan-Wook Park, Taesung Park, Joong Shin Park Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2022; 28(1): 105. CrossRef
Toward More Comprehensive Homologous Recombination Deficiency Assays in Ovarian Cancer Part 2: Medical Perspectives Stanislas Quesada, Michel Fabbro, Jérôme Solassol Cancers.2022; 14(4): 1098. CrossRef
Construction and validation of a transcription factors-based prognostic signature for ovarian cancer Qingyuan Cheng, Liman Li, Mingxia Yu Journal of Ovarian Research.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Predicting preterm birth through vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and WBC using a machine learning model Sunwha Park, Jeongsup Moon, Nayeon Kang, Young-Han Kim, Young-Ah You, Eunjin Kwon, AbuZar Ansari, Young Min Hur, Taesung Park, Young Ju Kim Frontiers in Microbiology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic nomogram that predicts progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma Jiayi Li, Dongyan Cao Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Recent Advances and Future Directions of Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction Models in Ovarian Cancer Judan Zeng, Wenjiao Cao, Lihua Wang Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science).2021; 26(1): 10. CrossRef
Sphingolipids as multifaceted mediators in ovarian cancer MelissaR Pitman, Martin K. Oehler, Stuart M. Pitson Cellular Signalling.2021; 81: 109949. CrossRef
Development and validation for prognostic nomogram of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence based on circulating tumor cells and epithelial–mesenchymal transition Jiani Yang, Jun Ma, Yue Jin, Shanshan Cheng, Shan Huang, Nan Zhang, Yu Wang Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prediction Models for the Clinical Severity of Patients With COVID-19 in Korea: Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study Bumjo Oh, Suhyun Hwangbo, Taeyeong Jung, Kyungha Min, Chanhee Lee, Catherine Apio, Hyejin Lee, Seungyeoun Lee, Min Kyong Moon, Shin-Woo Kim, Taesung Park Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(4): e25852. CrossRef
Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Platinum Sensitivity of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Suhyun Hwangbo, Se Ik Kim, Ju-Hyun Kim, Kyung Jin Eoh, Chanhee Lee, Young Tae Kim, Dae-Shik Suh, Taesung Park, Yong Sang Song Cancers.2021; 13(8): 1875. CrossRef
M2 Macrophage-Based Prognostic Nomogram for Gastric Cancer After Surgical Resection Jianwen Hu, Yongchen Ma, Ju Ma, Yanpeng Yang, Yingze Ning, Jing Zhu, Pengyuan Wang, Guowei Chen, Yucun Liu Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognosis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with postoperative adjuvant transcatheter hepatic artery chemoembolization Ji-Bin Liu, Kai-Jian Chu, Chang-Chun Ling, Ting-Miao Wu, Hui-Min Wang, Yi Shi, Zhi-Zhen Li, Jing-Han Wang, Zhi-Jun Wu, Xiao-Qing Jiang, Gao-Ren Wang, Yu-Shui Ma, Da Fu Current Problems in Cancer.2020; 44(6): 100612. CrossRef
Can we predict who lives long with ovarian cancer? Michael A. Bookman Cancer.2019; 125(S24): 4578. CrossRef