Hee Kyung Kim, Jun Soo Ham, Seonggyu Byeon, Kwai Han Yoo, Ki Sun Jung, Haa-Na Song, Jinhyun Cho, Ji Yun Lee, Sung Hee Lim, Hae Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Se Kyung Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1382-1388. Published online March 11, 2016
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the tumor characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of adjuvant treatments after surgery with a curative aim for patients with breast cancer who are 65 years and older. Materials and Methods Patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2000 to 2009 were analyzed (n=4,388). Tumor characteristics and survival outcome were compared by dividing the patients into two age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65 years old). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for comparison of survival rates by log-rank test, and a Cox regression model was used to examine the effect of variables.
Results Among 4,388 patients with invasive breast cancer, 317 patients (7.2%) were 65 years or older and the median age of all patients was 47 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Tumor characteristics were similar between the two age groups, but the older patients were treated less often with adjuvant treatments. During a median follow-up period of 122 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was equivalent for patients 65 years and older compared to younger patients, but significantly worse in overall survival (OS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) (5-year OS, 94.3% vs. 90.5%; p < 0.001 and 5-year BCSS, 94.7% vs. 91.8%; p=0.031). In the multivariate model, age ≥ 65 years old was identified as an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. Conclusion Elderly breast cancer appeared to have worse outcomes with very low prevalence in Korea, despite similar tumor characteristics. More active adjuvant therapies would have a role for aggressive subtypes for fit, elderly patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
HISTOPATHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF BREAST CANCER IN ELDERLY KURDISH WOMEN Kamal Saeed, Shewaz Salih JOURNAL OF SULAIMANI MEDICAL COLLEGE.2023; 13(4): 11. CrossRef
Analysis of the tumor characteristics in young age breast cancer patients using collaborative stage data of the Korea Central Cancer Registry Junyup Kim, Seri Hong, Jae Jun Lee, Young-Joo Won, Eun Sook Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Jai Hong Han, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Heein Jo, Hyun Hee Kim, So-Youn Jung Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 187(3): 785. CrossRef
Survival outcomes in elderly Taiwanese women according to breast cancer subtype and lymph node status: A single-center retrospective study Kung-Hung Lin, Huan-Ming Hsu, Kuo-Feng Hsu, Chi-Hong Chu, Zhi-Jie Hong, Chun-Yu Fu, Yu-Ching Chou, Golshan Mehra, Ming-Shen Dai, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Guo-Shiou Liao, Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh PLOS ONE.2021; 16(12): e0261258. CrossRef
Could lymph node evaluation be eliminated in nearly 50% of women with early stage ER/PR positive breast cancer? Juan Ruiz, Gerson Maldonado, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Jared Reyes, Karson Quinn, Patty L. Tenofsky The American Journal of Surgery.2020; 220(6): 1417. CrossRef
Overall survival of elderly patients with breast cancer is not related to breast-cancer specific survival: A single institution experience in Japan Haruko Takuwa, Wakako Tsuji, Fumiaki Yotsumoto Breast Disease.2018; 37(4): 177. CrossRef
Observational study of coagulation activation in early breast cancer: development of a prognostic model based on data from the real world setting Chiara Mandoj, Laura Pizzuti, Domenico Sergi, Isabella Sperduti, Marco Mazzotta, Luigi Di Lauro, Antonella Amodio, Silvia Carpano, Anna Di Benedetto, Claudio Botti, Francesca Ferranti, Anna Antenucci, Maria Gabriella D’Alessandro, Paolo Marchetti, Silveri Journal of Translational Medicine.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Do site and type of metastasis in breast cancer show a changing pattern with increased age? A cross comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between age groups Majid Akrami, Afrooz Sepahdar, Peyman Arasteh, Sedigheh Tahmasebi, Vahid Zangouri, Azam Askari, Babak Pezeshki, Abdolrasoul Talei World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Predicting Nodal Positivity in Women 70 Years of Age and Older with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer to Aid Incorporation of a Society of Surgical Oncology Choosing Wisely Guideline into Clinical Practice Jessemae L. Welsh, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Elizabeth B. Habermann, Matthew P. Goetz, Judy C. Boughey Annals of Surgical Oncology.2017; 24(10): 2881. CrossRef
Combination of 125I brachytherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent breast cancer Qixing Tan, Qinghong Qin, Weiping Yang, Bin Lian, Qinguo Mo, Changyuan Wei Medicine.2016; 95(44): e5302. CrossRef
Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyunghee Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Eunjin Lee, Eun Yoon Cho, Kwang Hee Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Se Kyung Lee, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1338-1350. Published online February 18, 2016
Purpose TP53, the most frequently mutated gene in breast cancer, is more frequently altered in HER2-enriched and basal-like breast cancer. However, no studies have clarified the role of TP53 status as a prognostic and predictive marker of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Materials and Methods
We performed p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC), nCounter mRNA expression assay, and DNA sequencing to determine the relationship between TP53 alteration and clinical outcomes of TNBC patients.
Results
Seventy-seven of 174 TNBC patients were found to harbor a TP53 mutation. Patients with missense mutations showed high protein expression in contrast to patients with deletion mutations (positivity of IHC: wild type vs. missense vs. deletion mutation, 53.6% vs. 89.8% vs. 25.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). TP53 mRNA expression was influenced by mutation status (mRNA expression [median]: wild type vs. missense vs. deletion mutation, 207.36± 132.73 vs. 339.61±143.21 vs. 99.53±99.57,respectively; p < 0.001). According to survival analysis, neither class of mutation nor protein or mRNA expression status had any impact on patient prognosis. In subgroup analysis, low mRNA expression was associated with poor prognosis in patientswith a TP53 missense mutation (5-year distantrecurrence-free survival [5Y DRFS]: low vs. high, 50.0% vs. 87.8%; p=0.009), while high mRNA expression with a TP53 deletion mutation indicated poor prognosis (5Y DRFS: low vs. high, 91.7% vs. 75.0%; p=0.316).
Conclusion
Association between TP53 mutation and expression indicates a potential prognostic marker of TNBC; hence both DNA sequencing and mRNA expression analysis may be required to predict the prognosis of TNBC patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Large Cohort of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Rachel Han, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Dina Boles, Hannah Wu, Nikolina Curcin, Elzbieta Slodkowska International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2024; 32(2): 239. CrossRef
Exploring Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Hallmarks of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up in Clinical Practice Laura Lopez-Gonzalez, Alicia Sanchez Cendra, Cristina Sanchez Cendra, Eduardo David Roberts Cervantes, Javier Cassinello Espinosa, Tatiana Pekarek, Oscar Fraile-Martinez, Cielo García-Montero, Ana María Rodriguez-Slocker, Laura Jiménez-Álvarez, Luis G. Gu Medicina.2024; 60(1): 168. CrossRef
TP53R175H mutation promotes breast cancer cell proliferation through CORO1A–P38 MAPK pathway regulation Yali Su, Jiaxuan Zhao, Haoran Fu, Zeliang Liu, Panyan Du, Jianxia Zheng, Jinghua Wu, Jinghua Zhang Biochemical Pharmacology.2024; 221: 116047. CrossRef
TP53 and/or BRCA1 Mutations Based on CtDNA Analysis as Prognostic Biomarkers for Primary Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Akiko Arimura, Kazuko Sakai, Kazuhisa Kaneshiro, Takafumi Morisaki, Saori Hayashi, Kimihisa Mizoguchi, Mai Yamada, Masaya Kai, Mayumi Ono, Kazuto Nishio, Masafumi Nakamura, Makoto Kubo Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1184. CrossRef
Exploration of newly synthesized deferasirox derivatives as potential anti-cancer agents via in-vitro and in-silico approaches Muhammad Zahid Ullah, Zahid Hussain, Syed Ahmad Shakir, Mahnoor Mahmood, Syeda Abida Ejaz, Mubashir Aziz, Ammara Fayyaz, Jamshed Iqbal, Amara Mumtaz International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.2024; 283: 137971. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Zhijun Li, Yiqun Han, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(2): 190. CrossRef
The role of p53 and ki67 in predicting clinical outcome in breast cancer patients Bhanu Prakash Lalkota, B.J Srinivasa, Mani V. Swamy, Diganta Hazarika, B.M Jeet, K Jyothi, Mithua Ghosh, Suhail M. Sayeed, Mohammad Nasiruddin, Radheshyam Naik Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2023; 19(2): 208. CrossRef
Novel microtubule inhibitor SQ overcomes multidrug resistance in MCF-7/ADR cells by inhibiting BCRP function and mediating apoptosis Xing Chang, Zi Liu, Simeng Cao, Jiang Bian, Dayong Zheng, Nuo Wang, Qi Guan, Yingliang Wu, Weige Zhang, Zengqiang Li, Daiying Zuo Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.2022; 436: 115883. CrossRef
Targeted gene next‐generation sequencing reveals genomic profile in a cohort of 46 Chinese patients with breast cancer Jie Yao, Qian Chen, Jun‐qi Zhu, Rui‐gang Cai The Journal of Gene Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of the elastin-derived peptides (VGVAPG and VVGPGA) on breast (MCF-7) and lung (A549) cancer cell lines in vitro Konrad A. Szychowski, Bartosz Skóra, Tadeusz Pomianek Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2022; 151: 113149. CrossRef
p53 Missense Mutation is Associated with Immune Cell PD-L1 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Ai-Yan Xing, Long Liu, Ke Liang, Bin Wang Cancer Investigation.2022; 40(10): 879. CrossRef
Checkpoint Kinase 1 (CHK1) Functions as Both a Diagnostic Marker and a Regulator of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Hyo-Jin Kim, Bo-Gyeong Seo, Eun-Chan Seo, Kwang-Min Lee, Cheol Hwangbo Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2022; 44(12): 5848. CrossRef
An integrative pan-cancer analysis of COPB1 based on data mining Heyan Chen, Kunlong Li, Yijun Li, Peilin Xie, Jianjun He, Huimin Zhang Cancer Biomarkers.2021; 30(1): 13. CrossRef
Sex differences in expression of immune elements emerge in children, young adults and mice with osteosarcoma Lauren J. Mills, Logan G. Spector, David A. Largaespada, Lindsay A. Williams Biology of Sex Differences.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
GATA3 as an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: A Study with a Review of the Literature Patrizia Querzoli, Massimo Pedriali, Rosa Rinaldi, Paola Secchiero, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Elisabetta Kuhn Diagnostics.2021; 11(4): 604. CrossRef
Oncogenic and Tumor Suppressive Components of the Cell Cycle in Breast Cancer Progression and Prognosis Dharambir Kashyap, Vivek Kumar Garg, Elise N. Sandberg, Neelam Goel, Anupam Bishayee Pharmaceutics.2021; 13(4): 569. CrossRef
Characterization of Frequently Mutated Cancer Genes and Tumor Mutation Burden in Chinese Breast Cancer Weikai Xiao, Guochun Zhang, Bo Chen, Xiaoqing Chen, Lingzhu Wen, Jianguo Lai, Xuerui Li, Min Li, Hao Liu, Jing Liu, Han Han-Zhang, Analyn Lizaso, Ning Liao Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Syndrome de Peutz–Jeghers et surveillance mammaire : les nouvelles recommandations à propos d’une observation M. Osada, P. Maniez, N. Taris, C. Mathelin Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie .2021; 49(10): 795. CrossRef
Curcumin: Modulator of Key Molecular Signaling Pathways in Hormone-Independent Breast Cancer Reyhaneh Farghadani, Rakesh Naidu Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3427. CrossRef
Effect of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) and SP600125, a JNK Inhibitor, on Wnt Signaling in Canine Prostate Cancer Growth and Bone Metastases Wachiraphan Supsavhad, Bardes B. Hassan, Jessica K. Simmons, Wessel P. Dirksen, Said M. Elshafae, Nicole A. Kohart, Aylin A. Demirer, Thomas J. Rosol Veterinary Sciences.2021; 8(8): 153. CrossRef
TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines Ashkan Shahbandi, Hoang D. Nguyen, James G. Jackson Trends in Cancer.2020; 6(2): 98. CrossRef
The novel TP53 3′-end methylation pattern associated with its expression would be a potential biomarker for breast cancer detection Feng Zeng, Jianfu Heng, Xinwu Guo, Yue Wang, Wenhan Wu, Lili Tang, Min Chen, Shouman Wang, Hongyu Deng, Jun Wang Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 180(1): 237. CrossRef
Clinical spectrum and prognostic value of TP53 mutations in circulating tumor DNA from breast cancer patients in China Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Guohua Rong, Yanfang Guan, Chunxiao Li, Binghe Xu Cancer Communications.2020; 40(6): 260. CrossRef
Gain-of-Function Mutant p53 R273H Interacts with Replicating DNA and PARP1 in Breast Cancer Gu Xiao, Devon Lundine, George K. Annor, Jorge Canar, Viola Ellison, Alla Polotskaia, Patrick L. Donabedian, Thomas Reiner, Galina F. Khramtsova, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Alexander Mazo, Jill Bargonetti Cancer Research.2020; 80(3): 394. CrossRef
Genomic analysis of racial differences in triple negative breast cancer Chang-Sheng Chang, Eiko Kitamura, Joan Johnson, Roni Bollag, Lesleyann Hawthorn Genomics.2019; 111(6): 1529. CrossRef
p53 expression status is associated with cancer-specific survival in stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy Hyeon Jeong Oh, Jeong Mo Bae, Xianyu Wen, Seorin Jung, Younghoon Kim, Kyung Ju Kim, Nam-Yun Cho, Jung Ho Kim, Sae-Won Han, Tae-You Kim, Gyeong Hoon Kang British Journal of Cancer.2019; 120(8): 797. CrossRef
Immunostaining for p53 and p16CDKN2A Protein Is Not Predictive of Prognosis for Dogs with Malignant Mammary Gland Neoplasms John S Munday, Harsha Ariyarathna, Danielle Aberdein, Neroli A Thomson Veterinary Sciences.2019; 6(1): 34. CrossRef
NUP98 – a novel predictor of response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer Paul B. Mullan, Victoria Bingham, Paula Haddock, Gareth W. Irwin, Elaine Kay, Stephen McQuaid, Niamh E. Buckley BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Association of p53 expression with poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma Jing-ping Li, Xiang-mei Zhang, Zhenzhen Zhang, Li-hua Zheng, Sonali Jindal, Yun-jiang Liu Medicine.2019; 98(18): e15449. CrossRef
Elevated levels of eEF1A2 protein expression in triple negative breast cancer relate with poor prognosis Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Petracci, Oriana Nanni, Cristina Bottin, Maurizio Pinamonti, Fabrizio Zanconati, Bruna Scaggiante, Aamir Ahmad PLOS ONE.2019; 14(6): e0218030. CrossRef
Mutational analysis of triple-negative breast cancers within the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 22-00 Elisabetta Munzone, Kathryn P. Gray, Caterina Fumagalli, Elena Guerini-Rocco, István Láng, Thomas Ruhstaller, Lorenzo Gianni, Roswitha Kammler, Giuseppe Viale, Angelo Di Leo, Alan S. Coates, Richard D. Gelber, Meredith M. Regan, Aron Goldhirsch, Massimo B Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 170(2): 351. CrossRef
Cold atmospheric plasma conveys selectivity on triple negative breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo Liangjian Xiang, Xiaoyu Xu, Shuo Zhang, Dongyan Cai, Xiaofeng Dai Free Radical Biology and Medicine.2018; 124: 205. CrossRef
Genetic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Zuzana Sporikova, Vladimira Koudelakova, Radek Trojanec, Marian Hajduch Clinical Breast Cancer.2018; 18(5): e841. CrossRef
Prognostic value of immunohistochemically detected p53 in adjuvant chemotherapy‐treated triple negative breast cancer Soo Youn Bae, Seung Pil Jung, Se Kyung Lee, Jonghan Yu, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2018; 34(12): 663. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of CD117 expression and TP53 missense mutations in triple-negative breast cancer Yanli Luo, Wentao Huang, Huizhen Zhang, Guang Liu Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
P53 and Ki-67 as prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer patients Yunbao Pan, Yufen Yuan, Guoshi Liu, Yongchang Wei, William B. Coleman PLOS ONE.2017; 12(2): e0172324. CrossRef
Alcohol promotes migration and invasion of triple‐negative breast cancer cells through activation of p38 MAPK and JNK Ming Zhao, Erin W. Howard, Amanda B. Parris, Zhiying Guo, Qingxia Zhao, Xiaohe Yang Molecular Carcinogenesis.2017; 56(3): 849. CrossRef
Landscape of somatic mutations in different subtypes of advanced breast cancer with circulating tumor DNA analysis Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Chunxiao Li, Rongrong Chen, Lifang Yuan, Xiaoying Sun, Xiuwen Guan, Lixi Li, Binliang Liu, Yanfang Guan, Haili Qian, Binghe Xu Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
TP53 gene expression levels and tumor aggressiveness in canine mammary carcinomas Táya F. Oliveira, Tábata Maués, Mariana S. Ramundo, Agnes Marie S. Figueiredo, Marcela F. V. de Mello, Kênia B. El-Jaick, Maria de Lourdes G. Ferreira, Ana Maria R. Ferreira Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation.2017; 29(6): 865. CrossRef
Overexpression of p53 protein is a marker of poor prognosis in Mexican women with breast cancer Jisela Dimas-González, Vilma Maldonado-Lagunas, José Díaz-Chávez, María Eugenia López-Arellano, José Muñoz-Camacho, Marco Antonio Terán-Porcayo, Alfredo Lagunas-Martínez Oncology Reports.2017; 37(5): 3026. CrossRef
Genomic comparison of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions by multi-region whole-exome sequencing Xi-Xi Chen, Qian Zhong, Yang Liu, Shu-Mei Yan, Zhang-Hua Chen, Shan-Zhao Jin, Tian-Liang Xia, Ruo-Yan Li, Ai-Jun Zhou, Zhe Su, Yu-Hua Huang, Qi-Tao Huang, Li-Yun Huang, Xing Zhang, Yan-Na Zhao, Jin-Ping Yun, Qiu-Liang Wu, Dong-Xin Lin, Fan Bai, Mu-Sheng Z Nature Communications.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical implications of genomic profiles in metastatic breast cancer with a focus on TP53 and PIK3CA, the most frequently mutated genes Ji-Yeon Kim, Eunjin Lee, Kyunghee Park, Woong-Yang Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park Oncotarget.2017; 8(17): 27997. CrossRef
miR-34a expression in human breast cancer is associated with drug resistance Zhi-Hua Li, Xueling Weng, Qiu-Yun Xiong, Jian-Hong Tu, An Xiao, Wei Qiu, Yu Gong, Er-Wei Hu, Songyin Huang, Ya-Li Cao Oncotarget.2017; 8(63): 106270. CrossRef
Coexistent Loss of the Expressions of BRCA1 and p53 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Min Chong Kim, Jung Eun Choi, Soo Jung Lee, Young Kyung Bae Annals of Surgical Oncology.2016; 23(11): 3524. CrossRef
2-Methoxy-5((3,4,5-trimethosyphenyl)seleninyl) phenol inhibits MDM2 and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells through a p53-independent pathway Jingwen Xu, Mengting Han, Jiwei Shen, Qi Guan, Zhaoshi Bai, Binyue Lang, Huijuan Zhang, Zengqiang Li, Daiying Zuo, Weige Zhang, Yingliang Wu Cancer Letters.2016; 383(1): 9. CrossRef
Purpose
The 21-gene (Oncotype DX) recurrence score (RS) assay is useful in predicting the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer patients and is widely used in Western countries. However, to date, it has not gained much popularity in East Asia. We analyzed the results from five institutions’ experience from using the 21-gene assay and examined the impact of assay results on decision making of chemotherapy in Korean breast cancer patients and the associations between RS and clinicopathologic characteristics.
Materials and Methods
The 21-gene assay was performed on 212 patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in five institutions. Each center made systemic treatment decisions both before and after the knowledge of assay results.
Results
Among the 212 patients, 132 (62.3%) had a low RS of < 18, 60 (28.3%) had an intermediate RS of 18-30, and 20 (9.4%) had a high RS of ≥ 31. Histologic grade, presence of micrometastases, Ki-67, and presence of lymphatic invasion were statistically associated with the RS results. Treatment decisions were changed in 115 of 212 patients (54.2%) in 109 of 212 (51.4%) from chemotherapy plus hormone therapy to hormone therapy, and in six of 212 (2.8%) from hormone therapy to chemotherapy plus hormone therapy.
Conclusion
The 21-gene breast cancer assay proved to have a significant impact on treatment decision- making. The test reduces chemotherapy use in more than 50% of Korean estrogen receptor-positive, early breast cancer patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Rochester Modified Magee Algorithm (RoMMa): An Outcomes Based Strategy for Clinical Risk-Assessment and Risk-Stratification in ER Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients Being Considered for Oncotype DX® Testing Bradley M. Turner, Brian S. Finkelman, David G. Hicks, Numbere Numbereye, Ioana Moisini, Ajay Dhakal, Kristin Skinner, Mary Ann G. Sanders, Xi Wang, Michelle Shayne, Linda Schiffhauer, Hani Katerji, Huina Zhang Cancers.2023; 15(3): 903. CrossRef
Comprehensive analysis of the 21-gene recurrence score in invasive ductal breast carcinoma with or without ductal carcinoma in situ component Yufei Zeng, Weiqi Gao, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen British Journal of Cancer.2021; 124(5): 975. CrossRef
Identifying Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Oncotype DX® 21-Gene Recurrence Score: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Patients in Quebec City, Canada Simon Gagnet, Caroline Diorio, Louise Provencher, Cynthia Mbuya-Bienge, Julie Lapointe, Claudya Morin, Julie Lemieux, Hermann Nabi Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(9): 858. CrossRef
Biomarker and multigene assay testing in ER positive, HER-2 negative breast carcinomas: An international guidelines-based approach Bradley M. Turner, Hani Katerji, Huina Zhang, David G. Hicks Human Pathology Reports.2021; 26: 300574. CrossRef
Development of a Nomogram to Predict the Recurrence Score of 21-Gene Prediction Assay in Hormone Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer Shin Hye Yoo, Tae-Yong Kim, Miso Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Eunshin Lee, Han-Byoel Lee, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Sae-Won Han, Tae-You Kim, Seock-Ah Im Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(2): 98. CrossRef
Impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in older patients with breast cancer Yufei Zeng, Weiqi Gao, Lin Lin, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2020; 11(5): 843. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors of Disease Recurrence in Breast Cancer Using Quantitative and Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Parameters Jeongmin Lee, Sung Hun Kim, Bong Joo Kang Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX) on concordance of adjuvant therapy decision making as measured by the Liverpool Systemic Therapy Adjuvant Decision Tool Anna Olsson-Brown, Pavlos Piskilidis, Julie O'Hagan, Nicky Thorp, Peter Robson, Helen Innes, Helen Wong, Silvia Cicconi, Richard Jackson, Tamara Kiernan, Christopher Holcombe, Susan O'Reilly, Carlo Palmieri The Breast.2019; 44: 94. CrossRef
Clinical significance of 21-gene recurrence score assay for hormone receptor–positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer in early stage Yang Yu-qing, Wang Lei, Huang Mei-ling, Xiao Jing-jing, Wei Mei-chen, Wu Jiang, Hao Jun-sheng, Ling Rui, Li Nan-lin Experimental and Molecular Pathology.2019; 108: 150. CrossRef
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis Sue Harnan, Paul Tappenden, Katy Cooper, John Stevens, Alice Bessey, Rachid Rafia, Sue Ward, Ruth Wong, Robert C Stein, Janet Brown Health Technology Assessment.2019; 23(30): 1. CrossRef
Uptake of the 21-Gene Assay Among Women With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor−Positive Breast Cancer Megan C. Roberts, Allison W. Kurian, Valentina I. Petkov Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.2019; 17(6): 662. CrossRef
Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival among patients 70 years of age and younger with node-negative breast cancer and the 21-gene recurrence score of 26–30 Seho Park, Yunan Han, Ying Liu, Adetunji T. Toriola, Lindsay L. Peterson, Graham A. Colditz, Seung Il Kim, Young Up Cho, Byeong-Woo Park, Yikyung Park Breast Cancer Research.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical analysis of 21‑gene recurrence score test in hormone receptor‑positive early‑stage breast cancer Lizhe Zhu, Nan Ma, Bin Wang, Can Zhou, Yu Yan, Ke Wang, Jianjun He, Yu Ren Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Systematic review of the clinical and economic value of gene expression profiles for invasive early breast cancer available in Europe E.J. Blok, E. Bastiaannet, W.B. van den Hout, G.J. Liefers, V.T.H.B.M. Smit, J.R. Kroep, C.J.H. van de Velde Cancer Treatment Reviews.2018; 62: 74. CrossRef
Verification of a Western Nomogram for Predicting Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Scores in Korean Patients with Breast Cancer Jae-Myung Kim, Jai Min Ryu, Isaac Kim, Hee Jun Choi, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Jeong Eon Lee Journal of Breast Cancer.2018; 21(2): 222. CrossRef
Use of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with or without the 21-gene expression assay Soo Jin Park, Moo Hyun Lee, Sun-Young Kong, Mi Kyung Song, Jungnam Joo, Youngmee Kwon, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jai Hong Han, Sung Hoon Sim, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Keun Seok Lee, In Hae Park, Eun Sook Lee Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 170(1): 69. CrossRef
Practice patterns and outcomes for patients with node-negative hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and intermediate 21-gene Recurrence Scores Jonathan Chen, Xian Wu, Paul J. Christos, Silvia Formenti, Himanshu Nagar Breast Cancer Research.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Only estrogen receptor “positive” is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer Jai Min Ryu, Hee Jun Choi, Isaac Kim, Se Kyung Lee, Jonghan Yu, Jee-Eun Kim, Byeong-il Kang, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 172(3): 627. CrossRef
Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit Jinkyoung Kim, Aeree Kim, Chungyeul Kim Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact d’un test de signature génomique en sénologie sur les décisions en réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire : une expérience française C. Dreyfus, M. Ballester, J. Gligorov, P. Agranat, M. Antoine, I. Tengher, A. Bricou Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.2015; 43(12): 780. CrossRef