Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Soo Youn Bae"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Clinicopathologic Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Experiences at a Single Institution in Korea
Hee Kyung Kim, Jun Soo Ham, Seonggyu Byeon, Kwai Han Yoo, Ki Sun Jung, Haa-Na Song, Jinhyun Cho, Ji Yun Lee, Sung Hee Lim, Hae Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Se Kyung Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1382-1388.   Published online March 11, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.423
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to assess the tumor characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of adjuvant treatments after surgery with a curative aim for patients with breast cancer who are 65 years and older. Materials and Methods Patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2000 to 2009 were analyzed (n=4,388). Tumor characteristics and survival outcome were compared by dividing the patients into two age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65 years old). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for comparison of survival rates by log-rank test, and a Cox regression model was used to examine the effect of variables.
Results
Among 4,388 patients with invasive breast cancer, 317 patients (7.2%) were 65 years or older and the median age of all patients was 47 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Tumor characteristics were similar between the two age groups, but the older patients were treated less often with adjuvant treatments. During a median follow-up period of 122 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was equivalent for patients 65 years and older compared to younger patients, but significantly worse in overall survival (OS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) (5-year OS, 94.3% vs. 90.5%; p < 0.001 and 5-year BCSS, 94.7% vs. 91.8%; p=0.031). In the multivariate model, age ≥ 65 years old was identified as an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. Conclusion Elderly breast cancer appeared to have worse outcomes with very low prevalence in Korea, despite similar tumor characteristics. More active adjuvant therapies would have a role for aggressive subtypes for fit, elderly patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • HISTOPATHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF BREAST CANCER IN ELDERLY KURDISH WOMEN
    Kamal Saeed, Shewaz Salih
    JOURNAL OF SULAIMANI MEDICAL COLLEGE.2023; 13(4): 11.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the tumor characteristics in young age breast cancer patients using collaborative stage data of the Korea Central Cancer Registry
    Junyup Kim, Seri Hong, Jae Jun Lee, Young-Joo Won, Eun Sook Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Jai Hong Han, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Heein Jo, Hyun Hee Kim, So-Youn Jung
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 187(3): 785.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes in elderly Taiwanese women according to breast cancer subtype and lymph node status: A single-center retrospective study
    Kung-Hung Lin, Huan-Ming Hsu, Kuo-Feng Hsu, Chi-Hong Chu, Zhi-Jie Hong, Chun-Yu Fu, Yu-Ching Chou, Golshan Mehra, Ming-Shen Dai, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Guo-Shiou Liao, Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(12): e0261258.     CrossRef
  • Could lymph node evaluation be eliminated in nearly 50% of women with early stage ER/PR positive breast cancer?
    Juan Ruiz, Gerson Maldonado, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Jared Reyes, Karson Quinn, Patty L. Tenofsky
    The American Journal of Surgery.2020; 220(6): 1417.     CrossRef
  • Overall survival of elderly patients with breast cancer is not related to breast-cancer specific survival: A single institution experience in Japan
    Haruko Takuwa, Wakako Tsuji, Fumiaki Yotsumoto
    Breast Disease.2018; 37(4): 177.     CrossRef
  • Observational study of coagulation activation in early breast cancer: development of a prognostic model based on data from the real world setting
    Chiara Mandoj, Laura Pizzuti, Domenico Sergi, Isabella Sperduti, Marco Mazzotta, Luigi Di Lauro, Antonella Amodio, Silvia Carpano, Anna Di Benedetto, Claudio Botti, Francesca Ferranti, Anna Antenucci, Maria Gabriella D’Alessandro, Paolo Marchetti, Silveri
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do site and type of metastasis in breast cancer show a changing pattern with increased age? A cross comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between age groups
    Majid Akrami, Afrooz Sepahdar, Peyman Arasteh, Sedigheh Tahmasebi, Vahid Zangouri, Azam Askari, Babak Pezeshki, Abdolrasoul Talei
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting Nodal Positivity in Women 70 Years of Age and Older with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer to Aid Incorporation of a Society of Surgical Oncology Choosing Wisely Guideline into Clinical Practice
    Jessemae L. Welsh, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Elizabeth B. Habermann, Matthew P. Goetz, Judy C. Boughey
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2017; 24(10): 2881.     CrossRef
  • Combination of 125I brachytherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent breast cancer
    Qixing Tan, Qinghong Qin, Weiping Yang, Bin Lian, Qinguo Mo, Changyuan Wei
    Medicine.2016; 95(44): e5302.     CrossRef
  • 12,912 View
  • 156 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Association between Mutation and Expression of TP53 as a Potential Prognostic Marker of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyunghee Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Eunjin Lee, Eun Yoon Cho, Kwang Hee Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Se Kyung Lee, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1338-1350.   Published online February 18, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.430
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
TP53, the most frequently mutated gene in breast cancer, is more frequently altered in HER2-enriched and basal-like breast cancer. However, no studies have clarified the role of TP53 status as a prognostic and predictive marker of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Materials and Methods
We performed p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC), nCounter mRNA expression assay, and DNA sequencing to determine the relationship between TP53 alteration and clinical outcomes of TNBC patients.
Results
Seventy-seven of 174 TNBC patients were found to harbor a TP53 mutation. Patients with missense mutations showed high protein expression in contrast to patients with deletion mutations (positivity of IHC: wild type vs. missense vs. deletion mutation, 53.6% vs. 89.8% vs. 25.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). TP53 mRNA expression was influenced by mutation status (mRNA expression [median]: wild type vs. missense vs. deletion mutation, 207.36± 132.73 vs. 339.61±143.21 vs. 99.53±99.57,respectively; p < 0.001). According to survival analysis, neither class of mutation nor protein or mRNA expression status had any impact on patient prognosis. In subgroup analysis, low mRNA expression was associated with poor prognosis in patientswith a TP53 missense mutation (5-year distantrecurrence-free survival [5Y DRFS]: low vs. high, 50.0% vs. 87.8%; p=0.009), while high mRNA expression with a TP53 deletion mutation indicated poor prognosis (5Y DRFS: low vs. high, 91.7% vs. 75.0%; p=0.316).
Conclusion
Association between TP53 mutation and expression indicates a potential prognostic marker of TNBC; hence both DNA sequencing and mRNA expression analysis may be required to predict the prognosis of TNBC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Large Cohort of Triple Negative Breast Cancer
    Rachel Han, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Dina Boles, Hannah Wu, Nikolina Curcin, Elzbieta Slodkowska
    International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2024; 32(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Hallmarks of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up in Clinical Practice
    Laura Lopez-Gonzalez, Alicia Sanchez Cendra, Cristina Sanchez Cendra, Eduardo David Roberts Cervantes, Javier Cassinello Espinosa, Tatiana Pekarek, Oscar Fraile-Martinez, Cielo García-Montero, Ana María Rodriguez-Slocker, Laura Jiménez-Álvarez, Luis G. Gu
    Medicina.2024; 60(1): 168.     CrossRef
  • TP53R175H mutation promotes breast cancer cell proliferation through CORO1A–P38 MAPK pathway regulation
    Yali Su, Jiaxuan Zhao, Haoran Fu, Zeliang Liu, Panyan Du, Jianxia Zheng, Jinghua Wu, Jinghua Zhang
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2024; 221: 116047.     CrossRef
  • TP53 and/or BRCA1 Mutations Based on CtDNA Analysis as Prognostic Biomarkers for Primary Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Akiko Arimura, Kazuko Sakai, Kazuhisa Kaneshiro, Takafumi Morisaki, Saori Hayashi, Kimihisa Mizoguchi, Mai Yamada, Masaya Kai, Mayumi Ono, Kazuto Nishio, Masafumi Nakamura, Makoto Kubo
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1184.     CrossRef
  • Exploration of newly synthesized deferasirox derivatives as potential anti-cancer agents via in-vitro and in-silico approaches
    Muhammad Zahid Ullah, Zahid Hussain, Syed Ahmad Shakir, Mahnoor Mahmood, Syeda Abida Ejaz, Mubashir Aziz, Ammara Fayyaz, Jamshed Iqbal, Amara Mumtaz
    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.2024; 283: 137971.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Zhijun Li, Yiqun Han, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • The role of p53 and ki67 in predicting clinical outcome in breast cancer patients
    Bhanu Prakash Lalkota, B.J Srinivasa, Mani V. Swamy, Diganta Hazarika, B.M Jeet, K Jyothi, Mithua Ghosh, Suhail M. Sayeed, Mohammad Nasiruddin, Radheshyam Naik
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2023; 19(2): 208.     CrossRef
  • Novel microtubule inhibitor SQ overcomes multidrug resistance in MCF-7/ADR cells by inhibiting BCRP function and mediating apoptosis
    Xing Chang, Zi Liu, Simeng Cao, Jiang Bian, Dayong Zheng, Nuo Wang, Qi Guan, Yingliang Wu, Weige Zhang, Zengqiang Li, Daiying Zuo
    Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.2022; 436: 115883.     CrossRef
  • Targeted gene next‐generation sequencing reveals genomic profile in a cohort of 46 Chinese patients with breast cancer
    Jie Yao, Qian Chen, Jun‐qi Zhu, Rui‐gang Cai
    The Journal of Gene Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of the elastin-derived peptides (VGVAPG and VVGPGA) on breast (MCF-7) and lung (A549) cancer cell lines in vitro
    Konrad A. Szychowski, Bartosz Skóra, Tadeusz Pomianek
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2022; 151: 113149.     CrossRef
  • p53 Missense Mutation is Associated with Immune Cell PD-L1 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Ai-Yan Xing, Long Liu, Ke Liang, Bin Wang
    Cancer Investigation.2022; 40(10): 879.     CrossRef
  • Checkpoint Kinase 1 (CHK1) Functions as Both a Diagnostic Marker and a Regulator of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hyo-Jin Kim, Bo-Gyeong Seo, Eun-Chan Seo, Kwang-Min Lee, Cheol Hwangbo
    Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2022; 44(12): 5848.     CrossRef
  • An integrative pan-cancer analysis of COPB1 based on data mining
    Heyan Chen, Kunlong Li, Yijun Li, Peilin Xie, Jianjun He, Huimin Zhang
    Cancer Biomarkers.2021; 30(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex differences in expression of immune elements emerge in children, young adults and mice with osteosarcoma
    Lauren J. Mills, Logan G. Spector, David A. Largaespada, Lindsay A. Williams
    Biology of Sex Differences.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • GATA3 as an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: A Study with a Review of the Literature
    Patrizia Querzoli, Massimo Pedriali, Rosa Rinaldi, Paola Secchiero, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Elisabetta Kuhn
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(4): 604.     CrossRef
  • Oncogenic and Tumor Suppressive Components of the Cell Cycle in Breast Cancer Progression and Prognosis
    Dharambir Kashyap, Vivek Kumar Garg, Elise N. Sandberg, Neelam Goel, Anupam Bishayee
    Pharmaceutics.2021; 13(4): 569.     CrossRef
  • Characterization of Frequently Mutated Cancer Genes and Tumor Mutation Burden in Chinese Breast Cancer
    Weikai Xiao, Guochun Zhang, Bo Chen, Xiaoqing Chen, Lingzhu Wen, Jianguo Lai, Xuerui Li, Min Li, Hao Liu, Jing Liu, Han Han-Zhang, Analyn Lizaso, Ning Liao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Syndrome de Peutz–Jeghers et surveillance mammaire : les nouvelles recommandations à propos d’une observation
    M. Osada, P. Maniez, N. Taris, C. Mathelin
    Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie .2021; 49(10): 795.     CrossRef
  • Curcumin: Modulator of Key Molecular Signaling Pathways in Hormone-Independent Breast Cancer
    Reyhaneh Farghadani, Rakesh Naidu
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3427.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) and SP600125, a JNK Inhibitor, on Wnt Signaling in Canine Prostate Cancer Growth and Bone Metastases
    Wachiraphan Supsavhad, Bardes B. Hassan, Jessica K. Simmons, Wessel P. Dirksen, Said M. Elshafae, Nicole A. Kohart, Aylin A. Demirer, Thomas J. Rosol
    Veterinary Sciences.2021; 8(8): 153.     CrossRef
  • TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines
    Ashkan Shahbandi, Hoang D. Nguyen, James G. Jackson
    Trends in Cancer.2020; 6(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • The novel TP53 3′-end methylation pattern associated with its expression would be a potential biomarker for breast cancer detection
    Feng Zeng, Jianfu Heng, Xinwu Guo, Yue Wang, Wenhan Wu, Lili Tang, Min Chen, Shouman Wang, Hongyu Deng, Jun Wang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 180(1): 237.     CrossRef
  • Clinical spectrum and prognostic value of TP53 mutations in circulating tumor DNA from breast cancer patients in China
    Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Guohua Rong, Yanfang Guan, Chunxiao Li, Binghe Xu
    Cancer Communications.2020; 40(6): 260.     CrossRef
  • Gain-of-Function Mutant p53 R273H Interacts with Replicating DNA and PARP1 in Breast Cancer
    Gu Xiao, Devon Lundine, George K. Annor, Jorge Canar, Viola Ellison, Alla Polotskaia, Patrick L. Donabedian, Thomas Reiner, Galina F. Khramtsova, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Alexander Mazo, Jill Bargonetti
    Cancer Research.2020; 80(3): 394.     CrossRef
  • Genomic analysis of racial differences in triple negative breast cancer
    Chang-Sheng Chang, Eiko Kitamura, Joan Johnson, Roni Bollag, Lesleyann Hawthorn
    Genomics.2019; 111(6): 1529.     CrossRef
  • p53 expression status is associated with cancer-specific survival in stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy
    Hyeon Jeong Oh, Jeong Mo Bae, Xianyu Wen, Seorin Jung, Younghoon Kim, Kyung Ju Kim, Nam-Yun Cho, Jung Ho Kim, Sae-Won Han, Tae-You Kim, Gyeong Hoon Kang
    British Journal of Cancer.2019; 120(8): 797.     CrossRef
  • Immunostaining for p53 and p16CDKN2A Protein Is Not Predictive of Prognosis for Dogs with Malignant Mammary Gland Neoplasms
    John S Munday, Harsha Ariyarathna, Danielle Aberdein, Neroli A Thomson
    Veterinary Sciences.2019; 6(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • NUP98 – a novel predictor of response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
    Paul B. Mullan, Victoria Bingham, Paula Haddock, Gareth W. Irwin, Elaine Kay, Stephen McQuaid, Niamh E. Buckley
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of p53 expression with poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma
    Jing-ping Li, Xiang-mei Zhang, Zhenzhen Zhang, Li-hua Zheng, Sonali Jindal, Yun-jiang Liu
    Medicine.2019; 98(18): e15449.     CrossRef
  • Elevated levels of eEF1A2 protein expression in triple negative breast cancer relate with poor prognosis
    Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Petracci, Oriana Nanni, Cristina Bottin, Maurizio Pinamonti, Fabrizio Zanconati, Bruna Scaggiante, Aamir Ahmad
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(6): e0218030.     CrossRef
  • Mutational analysis of triple-negative breast cancers within the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 22-00
    Elisabetta Munzone, Kathryn P. Gray, Caterina Fumagalli, Elena Guerini-Rocco, István Láng, Thomas Ruhstaller, Lorenzo Gianni, Roswitha Kammler, Giuseppe Viale, Angelo Di Leo, Alan S. Coates, Richard D. Gelber, Meredith M. Regan, Aron Goldhirsch, Massimo B
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 170(2): 351.     CrossRef
  • Cold atmospheric plasma conveys selectivity on triple negative breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo
    Liangjian Xiang, Xiaoyu Xu, Shuo Zhang, Dongyan Cai, Xiaofeng Dai
    Free Radical Biology and Medicine.2018; 124: 205.     CrossRef
  • Genetic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Zuzana Sporikova, Vladimira Koudelakova, Radek Trojanec, Marian Hajduch
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2018; 18(5): e841.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of immunohistochemically detected p53 in adjuvant chemotherapy‐treated triple negative breast cancer
    Soo Youn Bae, Seung Pil Jung, Se Kyung Lee, Jonghan Yu, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam
    The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2018; 34(12): 663.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of CD117 expression and TP53 missense mutations in triple-negative breast cancer
    Yanli Luo, Wentao Huang, Huizhen Zhang, Guang Liu
    Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • P53 and Ki-67 as prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer patients
    Yunbao Pan, Yufen Yuan, Guoshi Liu, Yongchang Wei, William B. Coleman
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(2): e0172324.     CrossRef
  • Alcohol promotes migration and invasion of triple‐negative breast cancer cells through activation of p38 MAPK and JNK
    Ming Zhao, Erin W. Howard, Amanda B. Parris, Zhiying Guo, Qingxia Zhao, Xiaohe Yang
    Molecular Carcinogenesis.2017; 56(3): 849.     CrossRef
  • Landscape of somatic mutations in different subtypes of advanced breast cancer with circulating tumor DNA analysis
    Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Chunxiao Li, Rongrong Chen, Lifang Yuan, Xiaoying Sun, Xiuwen Guan, Lixi Li, Binliang Liu, Yanfang Guan, Haili Qian, Binghe Xu
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • TP53 gene expression levels and tumor aggressiveness in canine mammary carcinomas
    Táya F. Oliveira, Tábata Maués, Mariana S. Ramundo, Agnes Marie S. Figueiredo, Marcela F. V. de Mello, Kênia B. El-Jaick, Maria de Lourdes G. Ferreira, Ana Maria R. Ferreira
    Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation.2017; 29(6): 865.     CrossRef
  • Overexpression of p53 protein is a marker of poor prognosis in Mexican women with breast cancer
    Jisela Dimas-González, Vilma Maldonado-Lagunas, José Díaz-Chávez, María Eugenia López-Arellano, José Muñoz-Camacho, Marco Antonio Terán-Porcayo, Alfredo Lagunas-Martínez
    Oncology Reports.2017; 37(5): 3026.     CrossRef
  • Genomic comparison of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions by multi-region whole-exome sequencing
    Xi-Xi Chen, Qian Zhong, Yang Liu, Shu-Mei Yan, Zhang-Hua Chen, Shan-Zhao Jin, Tian-Liang Xia, Ruo-Yan Li, Ai-Jun Zhou, Zhe Su, Yu-Hua Huang, Qi-Tao Huang, Li-Yun Huang, Xing Zhang, Yan-Na Zhao, Jin-Ping Yun, Qiu-Liang Wu, Dong-Xin Lin, Fan Bai, Mu-Sheng Z
    Nature Communications.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implications of genomic profiles in metastatic breast cancer with a focus on TP53 and PIK3CA, the most frequently mutated genes
    Ji-Yeon Kim, Eunjin Lee, Kyunghee Park, Woong-Yang Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(17): 27997.     CrossRef
  • miR-34a expression in human breast cancer is associated with drug resistance
    Zhi-Hua Li, Xueling Weng, Qiu-Yun Xiong, Jian-Hong Tu, An Xiao, Wei Qiu, Yu Gong, Er-Wei Hu, Songyin Huang, Ya-Li Cao
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(63): 106270.     CrossRef
  • Coexistent Loss of the Expressions of BRCA1 and p53 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Min Chong Kim, Jung Eun Choi, Soo Jung Lee, Young Kyung Bae
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2016; 23(11): 3524.     CrossRef
  • 2-Methoxy-5((3,4,5-trimethosyphenyl)seleninyl) phenol inhibits MDM2 and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells through a p53-independent pathway
    Jingwen Xu, Mengting Han, Jiwei Shen, Qi Guan, Zhaoshi Bai, Binyue Lang, Huijuan Zhang, Zengqiang Li, Daiying Zuo, Weige Zhang, Yingliang Wu
    Cancer Letters.2016; 383(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • 17,702 View
  • 337 Download
  • 51 Web of Science
  • 45 Crossref
Close layer
The Clinical Impact of 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Treatment Decisions for Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in Korea
Moo Hyun Lee, Wonshik Han, Jeong Eon Lee, Ku Sang Kim, Heeseung Park, Jongjin Kim, Soo Youn Bae, Hyun Joo Shin, Jong Won Lee, Eun Sook Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(2):208-214.   Published online September 11, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2013.223
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The 21-gene (Oncotype DX) recurrence score (RS) assay is useful in predicting the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer patients and is widely used in Western countries. However, to date, it has not gained much popularity in East Asia. We analyzed the results from five institutions’ experience from using the 21-gene assay and examined the impact of assay results on decision making of chemotherapy in Korean breast cancer patients and the associations between RS and clinicopathologic characteristics.
Materials and Methods
The 21-gene assay was performed on 212 patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in five institutions. Each center made systemic treatment decisions both before and after the knowledge of assay results.
Results
Among the 212 patients, 132 (62.3%) had a low RS of < 18, 60 (28.3%) had an intermediate RS of 18-30, and 20 (9.4%) had a high RS of ≥ 31. Histologic grade, presence of micrometastases, Ki-67, and presence of lymphatic invasion were statistically associated with the RS results. Treatment decisions were changed in 115 of 212 patients (54.2%) in 109 of 212 (51.4%) from chemotherapy plus hormone therapy to hormone therapy, and in six of 212 (2.8%) from hormone therapy to chemotherapy plus hormone therapy.
Conclusion
The 21-gene breast cancer assay proved to have a significant impact on treatment decision- making. The test reduces chemotherapy use in more than 50% of Korean estrogen receptor-positive, early breast cancer patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Rochester Modified Magee Algorithm (RoMMa): An Outcomes Based Strategy for Clinical Risk-Assessment and Risk-Stratification in ER Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients Being Considered for Oncotype DX® Testing
    Bradley M. Turner, Brian S. Finkelman, David G. Hicks, Numbere Numbereye, Ioana Moisini, Ajay Dhakal, Kristin Skinner, Mary Ann G. Sanders, Xi Wang, Michelle Shayne, Linda Schiffhauer, Hani Katerji, Huina Zhang
    Cancers.2023; 15(3): 903.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive analysis of the 21-gene recurrence score in invasive ductal breast carcinoma with or without ductal carcinoma in situ component
    Yufei Zeng, Weiqi Gao, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    British Journal of Cancer.2021; 124(5): 975.     CrossRef
  • Identifying Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Oncotype DX® 21-Gene Recurrence Score: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Patients in Quebec City, Canada
    Simon Gagnet, Caroline Diorio, Louise Provencher, Cynthia Mbuya-Bienge, Julie Lapointe, Claudya Morin, Julie Lemieux, Hermann Nabi
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(9): 858.     CrossRef
  • Biomarker and multigene assay testing in ER positive, HER-2 negative breast carcinomas: An international guidelines-based approach
    Bradley M. Turner, Hani Katerji, Huina Zhang, David G. Hicks
    Human Pathology Reports.2021; 26: 300574.     CrossRef
  • Development of a Nomogram to Predict the Recurrence Score of 21-Gene Prediction Assay in Hormone Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer
    Shin Hye Yoo, Tae-Yong Kim, Miso Kim, Kyung-Hun Lee, Eunshin Lee, Han-Byoel Lee, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Sae-Won Han, Tae-You Kim, Seock-Ah Im
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • Impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in older patients with breast cancer
    Yufei Zeng, Weiqi Gao, Lin Lin, Xiaosong Chen, Kunwei Shen
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2020; 11(5): 843.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors of Disease Recurrence in Breast Cancer Using Quantitative and Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Parameters
    Jeongmin Lee, Sung Hun Kim, Bong Joo Kang
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX) on concordance of adjuvant therapy decision making as measured by the Liverpool Systemic Therapy Adjuvant Decision Tool
    Anna Olsson-Brown, Pavlos Piskilidis, Julie O'Hagan, Nicky Thorp, Peter Robson, Helen Innes, Helen Wong, Silvia Cicconi, Richard Jackson, Tamara Kiernan, Christopher Holcombe, Susan O'Reilly, Carlo Palmieri
    The Breast.2019; 44: 94.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of 21-gene recurrence score assay for hormone receptor–positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer in early stage
    Yang Yu-qing, Wang Lei, Huang Mei-ling, Xiao Jing-jing, Wei Mei-chen, Wu Jiang, Hao Jun-sheng, Ling Rui, Li Nan-lin
    Experimental and Molecular Pathology.2019; 108: 150.     CrossRef
  • Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis
    Sue Harnan, Paul Tappenden, Katy Cooper, John Stevens, Alice Bessey, Rachid Rafia, Sue Ward, Ruth Wong, Robert C Stein, Janet Brown
    Health Technology Assessment.2019; 23(30): 1.     CrossRef
  • Uptake of the 21-Gene Assay Among Women With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor−Positive Breast Cancer
    Megan C. Roberts, Allison W. Kurian, Valentina I. Petkov
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.2019; 17(6): 662.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival among patients 70 years of age and younger with node-negative breast cancer and the 21-gene recurrence score of 26–30
    Seho Park, Yunan Han, Ying Liu, Adetunji T. Toriola, Lindsay L. Peterson, Graham A. Colditz, Seung Il Kim, Young Up Cho, Byeong-Woo Park, Yikyung Park
    Breast Cancer Research.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical analysis of 21‑gene recurrence score test in hormone receptor‑positive early‑stage breast cancer
    Lizhe Zhu, Nan Ma, Bin Wang, Can Zhou, Yu Yan, Ke Wang, Jianjun He, Yu Ren
    Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of the clinical and economic value of gene expression profiles for invasive early breast cancer available in Europe
    E.J. Blok, E. Bastiaannet, W.B. van den Hout, G.J. Liefers, V.T.H.B.M. Smit, J.R. Kroep, C.J.H. van de Velde
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2018; 62: 74.     CrossRef
  • Verification of a Western Nomogram for Predicting Oncotype DX™ Recurrence Scores in Korean Patients with Breast Cancer
    Jae-Myung Kim, Jai Min Ryu, Isaac Kim, Hee Jun Choi, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Jeong Eon Lee
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2018; 21(2): 222.     CrossRef
  • Use of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients with or without the 21-gene expression assay
    Soo Jin Park, Moo Hyun Lee, Sun-Young Kong, Mi Kyung Song, Jungnam Joo, Youngmee Kwon, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jai Hong Han, Sung Hoon Sim, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Keun Seok Lee, In Hae Park, Eun Sook Lee
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 170(1): 69.     CrossRef
  • Practice patterns and outcomes for patients with node-negative hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and intermediate 21-gene Recurrence Scores
    Jonathan Chen, Xian Wu, Paul J. Christos, Silvia Formenti, Himanshu Nagar
    Breast Cancer Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Only estrogen receptor “positive” is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer
    Jai Min Ryu, Hee Jun Choi, Isaac Kim, Se Kyung Lee, Jonghan Yu, Jee-Eun Kim, Byeong-il Kang, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 172(3): 627.     CrossRef
  • Examination of the Biomark assay as an alternative to Oncotype DX for defining chemotherapy benefit
    Jinkyoung Kim, Aeree Kim, Chungyeul Kim
    Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact d’un test de signature génomique en sénologie sur les décisions en réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire : une expérience française
    C. Dreyfus, M. Ballester, J. Gligorov, P. Agranat, M. Antoine, I. Tengher, A. Bricou
    Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.2015; 43(12): 780.     CrossRef
  • 13,183 View
  • 127 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP