Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
10 "Seok Won Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
Breast cancer
Endoxifen Concentration Is Associated with Recurrence-Free Survival in Hormone-Sensitive Breast Cancer Patients
Beomki Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Byung-Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Jeong Eon Lee, Soo-Youn Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2025;57(1):140-149.   Published online June 18, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.1285
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The metabolism of tamoxifen is influenced by various cytochrome p450 enzymes, including CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, leading to variations in the levels of endoxifen, even with the same tamoxifen dose. However, the clinical significance of endoxifen for the prognosis of breast cancer patients remains controversial. This study aimed to elucidate the relevance of endoxifen level to recurrence-free survival censored with tamoxifen discontinuation (RFSt), representing the RFS for tamoxifen itself, of breast cancer patients and determine a suitable cutoff for prognostication.
Materials and Methods
The study included 478 breast cancer patients. Tamoxifen and its metabolites, including endoxifen, were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. An optimal cutoff was determined with maximally selected rank statistics. Survival analysis and Cox regression were conducted based on this cutoff.
Results
An endoxifen level of 21.00 ng/mL was the optimal cutoff for prognostication. Survival analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in RFSt between the low endoxifen group (≤ 21.00 ng/mL) and the high endoxifen group (> 21.00 ng/mL) (log-rank test, p=0.032). The 10-year probability of RFSt was 83.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.0 to 89.9) and 88.3% (95% CI, 83.3 to 93.5) in the low and high endoxifen groups, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression indicated endoxifen concentration as a significant factor associated with prognosis.
Conclusion
Endoxifen could serve as a marker for appropriate tamoxifen treatment with a cutoff of 21.00 ng/mL. Based on this cutoff, therapeutic drug monitoring would benefit patients displaying suboptimal endoxifen concentrations.
  • 1,144 View
  • 100 Download
Close layer
Impact of Social Support during Diagnosis and Treatment on Disease Progression in Young Patients with Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study
Danbee Kang, Seri Park, Hyo Jung Kim, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Ji-Yeon Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Juhee Cho, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(1):125-133.   Published online September 4, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.673
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
We evaluated the association between changes in social support after cancer treatment and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in such patients using a prospective cohort study.
Materials and Methods
Data were obtained from a prospective cohort study (NCT03131089) conducted at Samsung Medical Center (2013-2021). The primary outcome measure was RFS. Social support was measured using the social and family well-being (SFWB) domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General. We calculated the changes in SFWB scores before and during treatment and the hazard ratio for RFS by comparing such changes.
Results
The mean±standard deviation (SD) age of the patients was 35±3.9 years, and 71.5% and 64.8% of the patients were married and had children, respectively. The mean±SD SFWB score at baseline was 20.5±5.0 out of 26. After cancer treatment, 35.9%, 10.3%, and 53.8% of the participants had increasing, unchanged, and decreasing SFWB scores, respectively. The decreasing SFWB score group had a higher risk of mortality or recurrence than the increasing group. Risk factors for the decreasing score were the presence of children during diagnosis.
Conclusion
In this cohort, changes in social support after treatment were associated with RFS in young patients with breast cancer. Health professionals should develop family interventions to help them receive proper social support.
  • 3,299 View
  • 208 Download
Close layer
Real World Evidence of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/Carboplatin/Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab (TCHP) in Patients with HER2-Positive Early or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single-Institutional Clinical Experience
Ji-Yeon Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Seok Won Kim, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(4):1091-1098.   Published online January 10, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.901
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP) regimen is frequently used to treat early and locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer (BC) in neoadjuvant setting. However, large-scaled real-world evidence did not exist.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with early or locally advanced HER2-positive BC who underwent neoadjuvant TCHP followed by curative surgery at Samsung Medical Center between January 2016 and August 2020.
Results
Of 447 patients, 316 (70.7%) received breast-conserving surgery and 131 (29.3%) received total mastectomy. In terms of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) score were analyzed. The rate of pCR was 64% a class of RCB 0 was observed in 65% of cases, RCB class I in 12%, RCB class II in 14%, and RCB class III in 2%. The 3-year event-free survival rate was 90.6%, BC with pCR occurred in 92.8%, and BC with non-pCR in 86.3% (p=0.016). In terms of distant metastasis, the 3-year distant recurrence-free survival rate was 93.5%; BC with pCR occurred in 95.9% and BC with non-pCR in 89.2% (p=0.013). Mucositis (85.2%), pain (83.2%), and diarrhea (70.5%) were the most common non-hematologic adverse events. In terms of hematologic adverse events, anemia (89.9%) was the most commonly observed adverse events followed by thrombocytopenia (29.8%).
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant TCHP therapy had a pCR rate of 64% and a 3-year event-free survival of 90% in real world experience. In terms of toxicity profile, anemia was frequently observed and adequate management including occasional transfusion was required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • De-escalation of neoadjuvant taxane and carboplatin therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer with dual HER2 blockade: a multicenter real-world experience in China
    Song Wu, Li Bian, Haibo Wang, Shaohua Zhang, Tao Wang, Zhigang Yu, Jianbin Li, Feng Li, Kun Wang, Zefei Jiang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Distinct ER and PR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical outcomes of early HER2-positive breast cancer: A real-world analysis of 871 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy
    Haizhu Chen, Xiujuan Gui, Ziwei Zhou, Fengxi Su, Chang Gong, Shunrong Li, Wei Wu, Nanyan Rao, Qiang Liu, Herui Yao
    The Breast.2024; 75: 103733.     CrossRef
  • Impact of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer patients: a multicenter real-life HER2PATH study
    Ahmet Bilici, Omer Fatih Olmez, Muhammed Ali Kaplan, Berna Oksuzoglu, Ahmet Sezer, Nuri Karadurmus, Erdem Cubukcu, Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur, Sercan Aksoy, Dilek Erdem, Gul Basaran, Burcu Cakar, Abdallah T. M. Shbair, Cagatay Arslan, Ahmet Taner Sumbul, Sem
    Acta Oncologica.2023; 62(4): 381.     CrossRef
  • Pathologic Complete Response Achieved in Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy vs. Trastuzumab, Chemotherapy, and Pertuzumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Faizan Fazal, Muhammad Nauman Bashir, Maham Leeza Adil, Usama Tanveer, Mansoor Ahmed, Taha Zahid Chaudhry, Ali Ahmad Ijaz, Muhammad Haider
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trends of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node metastasis: a comprehensive single-center retrospective study
    Yeon Jin Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Soo Yeon Chung, Se Kyung Lee, Byung Joo Chae, Jonghan Yu, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jai Min Ryu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Anthracyclines versus No Anthracyclines in the Neoadjuvant Strategy for HER2+ Breast Cancer: Real-World Evidence
    Inês Soares de Pinho, Paulo Luz, Lucy Alves, Raquel Lopes-Brás, Vanessa Patel, Miguel Esperança-Martins, Lisa Gonçalves, Ritas Freitas, Diana Simão, Maria Roldán Galnares, Isabel Fernandes, Silvia Artacho Criado, Salvador Gamez Casado, Jose Baena Cañada,
    Clinical Drug Investigation.2023; 43(9): 691.     CrossRef
  • Benefit of postoperative regional nodal irradiation in patients receiving preoperative systemic therapy with docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer
    Nalee Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho, Tae Gyu Kim, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Sei Kyung Lee, Jai-Min Ryu, Yeon Hee Park, Haeyoung Kim
    The Breast.2023; 72: 103594.     CrossRef
  • Response Rate and Safety of a Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab, Atezolizumab, Docetaxel, and Trastuzumab Regimen for Patients With ERBB2-Positive Stage II/III Breast Cancer
    Hee Kyung Ahn, Sung Hoon Sim, Koung Jin Suh, Min Hwan Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Ji-Yeon Kim, Dae-Won Lee, Jin-Hee Ahn, Heejung Chae, Kyung-Hun Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Yoon-La Choi, Seock-Ah Im, Kyung Hae Jung, Yeon Hee Park
    JAMA Oncology.2022; 8(9): 1271.     CrossRef
  • 7,952 View
  • 591 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Clinicopathological Characterization of Double Heterozygosity for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Korean Breast Cancer Patients
Yoon Ju Bang, Won Kyung Kwon, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Byung-Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Jong-Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Jeong Eon Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):827-833.   Published online October 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.791
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Double heterozygosity (DH) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant is very rare with only a few cases reported, and most those in Caucasians. In this article, we present seven unrelated cases of DH for BRCA1/2 identified from a single institution in Korea, and describe the characteristics and phenotype of DH individuals compared to those with a single BRCA variant.
Materials and Methods
This study included 27,678 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and surgically treated at Samsung Medical Center (SMC) between January 2008 and June 2020. In total, 4,215 high-risk breast cancer patients were tested for the BRCA1/2 genes, and electronic medical records from 456 cases with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) were reviewed.
Results
A younger mean age at diagnosis was associated with DH than a single variant of BRCA1/2. More triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and higher nuclear and histologic grade cancer occurred with DH than BRCA2 variant. All 7 cases of DH were unrelated, and their mutation combinations were different. There were no Ashkenazi founder variants detected.
Conclusion
We suggest that patients with DH for BRCA1/2 variants develop breast cancer at a younger age, but the histopathologic features are similar to those of BRCA1.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multi-locus inherited neoplasia alleles syndromes in cancer: implications for clinical practice
    Jeanette Yuen, Siqin Zhou, Rebecca Caeser, Mallika Venkatramani, Diana Nur Bte Ishak, Shao-Tzu Li, Zewen Zhang, Jianbang Chiang, Sock Hoai Chan, Joanne Ngeow
    European Journal of Human Genetics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in China and the US
    Junjie Pan, Ning Ren, Lanqi Ren, YiBei Yang, Qiaoping Xu
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Chinese breast cancer patients with double heterozygosity for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline pathogenic variants
    Song Wen, Meng Zhang, Jiuan Chen, Li Hu, Jie Sun, Lu Yao, Ye Xu, Juan Zhang, Yuntao Xie
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2024; 208(1): 155.     CrossRef
  • Discovery of BRCA1/BRCA2 founder variants by haplotype analysis
    Won Kyung Kwon, Hyeok-Jae Jang, Jeong Eon Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Jai Min Ryu, Jonghan Yu, Ja-Hyun Jang, Jong-Won Kim
    Cancer Genetics.2022; 266-267: 19.     CrossRef
  • 6,486 View
  • 251 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Validation of Korean Version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) Among Breast Cancer Survivors
Sungkeun Shim, Danbee Kang, Nayeon Kim, Gayeon Han, Jihyun Lim, Hyunsoo Kim, Jeonghyun Park, Mankyung Lee, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Jai Min Ryu, Seok Jin Nam, Se Kyung Lee, Juhee Cho
Cancer Res Treat. 2022;54(3):834-841.   Published online October 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.784
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
Little is known about the impact of financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. We aim to validate the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity in Korean (COST-K) and evaluate financial toxicity among disease-free breast cancer survivors.
Materials and Methods
We conducted linguistic validation following a standardized methodology recommended by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy multilingual translation (FACITtrans). For psychometric validation, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with 4,297 disease-free breast cancer survivors at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea between November 2018 and April 2019. Survivors were asked to complete the COST-K and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaires. The test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the COST-K were assessed using standard scale construction techniques.
Results
The COST-K demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.81. The test-retest analysis revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78. The COST-K had moderate correlation (r=–0.60) with the financial difficulty item of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and week correlation with the items on acute and chronic symptom burdens (nausea/vomiting, –0.18; constipation, –0.14; diarrhea, –0.14), showing good convergent and divergent validity. The median COST-K was 27 (range, 0 to 44; mean±standard deivation [SD], 27.1±7.5) and about 30% and 5% of cancer survivors experienced mild and severe financial toxicity, respectively. Younger age, lower education, lower household income was associated with higher financial toxicity.
Conclusion
The COST-K is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. Considering its impact on the health-related quality of life, more studies need to be conducted to evaluate financial toxicity in cancer survivors and design interventions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Severity of Financial Toxicity for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy
    Jeremy P. Harris, Eric Ku, Garrett Harada, Sophie Hsu, Elaine Chiao, Pranathi Rao, Erin Healy, Misako Nagasaka, Jessica Humphreys, Michael A. Hoyt
    American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®.2024; 41(6): 592.     CrossRef
  • Financial Toxicity in Radiation Oncology: Impact for Our Patients and for Practicing Radiation Oncologists
    Victoria S. Wu, Xinglei Shen, Janet de Moor, Fumiko Chino, Jonathan Klein
    Advances in Radiation Oncology.2024; 9(3): 101419.     CrossRef
  • Measures of financial toxicity in cancer survivors: a systematic review
    L. B. Thomy, M. Crichton, L. Jones, P. M. Yates, N. H. Hart, L. G. Collins, R. J. Chan
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) in Vietnamese patients with cancer
    Binh Thang Tran, Dinh Duong Le, Thanh Gia Nguyen, Minh Tu Nguyen, Minh Hanh Nguyen, Cao Khoa Dang, Dinh Trung Tran, Le An Pham
    PLOS ONE.2024; 19(6): e0306339.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer and Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Stevanus Pangestu, Fanni Rencz
    Value in Health.2023; 26(2): 300.     CrossRef
  • Association between financial toxicity and health-related quality of life of patients with gynecologic cancer
    Yusuke Kajimoto, Kazunori Honda, Shiro Suzuki, Masahiko Mori, Hirofumi Tsubouchi, Kohshiro Nakao, Anri Azuma, Takashi Shibutani, Shoji Nagao, Takahiro Koyanagi, Izumi Kohara, Shuko Tamaki, Midori Yabuki, Lida Teng, Keiichi Fujiwara, Ataru Igarashi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 28(3): 454.     CrossRef
  • Financial Toxicity Following Cancer in a Middle-Income Country with a Pluralistic Health System: Validation of the COST Questionnaire
    Veni V. Sakti, Mahmoud Danaee, Cheng-Har Yip, Ros S. A. Bustamam, Marniza Saad, Gin Gin Gan, Jerome Tan, Yueh Ni Lim, Flora L.T. Chong, Murallitharan Munisamy, Farahida Mohd Farid, Boon Lui Sew, Yek-Ching Kong, Nishalini Muniandy, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
    Cancer Care Research Online.2023; 3(3): e044.     CrossRef
  • Financial Toxicity Among Breast Cancer Patients
    Yi Kuang, Xiaoyi Yuan, Zheng Zhu, Weijie Xing
    Cancer Nursing.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Heterogeneity of financial toxicity and associated risk factors for older cancer survivors in China
    Mingzhu Su, Siqi Liu, Li Liu, Fang Wang, Jiahui Lao, Xiaojie Sun
    iScience.2023; 26(10): 107768.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of financial toxicity and associated factors in female patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yusuf Çeli̇k, Sevilay Şenol Çeli̇k, Seda Sarıköse, Hande Nur Arslan
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validity of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) in patients with gynecologic cancer
    Yusuke Kajimoto, Takashi Shibutani, Shoji Nagao, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Shiro Suzuki, Masahiko Mori, Hirofumi Tsubouchi, Kohshiro Nakao, Anri Azuma, Takahiro Koyanagi, Izumi Kohara, Shuko Tamaki, Midori Yabuki, Lida Teng, Kazunori Honda, Ataru Igarashi
    International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.2022; : ijgc-2022-003410.     CrossRef
  • 7,346 View
  • 186 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Clinicopathologic Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Experiences at a Single Institution in Korea
Hee Kyung Kim, Jun Soo Ham, Seonggyu Byeon, Kwai Han Yoo, Ki Sun Jung, Haa-Na Song, Jinhyun Cho, Ji Yun Lee, Sung Hee Lim, Hae Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Se Kyung Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1382-1388.   Published online March 11, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.423
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to assess the tumor characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of adjuvant treatments after surgery with a curative aim for patients with breast cancer who are 65 years and older. Materials and Methods Patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2000 to 2009 were analyzed (n=4,388). Tumor characteristics and survival outcome were compared by dividing the patients into two age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65 years old). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for comparison of survival rates by log-rank test, and a Cox regression model was used to examine the effect of variables.
Results
Among 4,388 patients with invasive breast cancer, 317 patients (7.2%) were 65 years or older and the median age of all patients was 47 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Tumor characteristics were similar between the two age groups, but the older patients were treated less often with adjuvant treatments. During a median follow-up period of 122 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was equivalent for patients 65 years and older compared to younger patients, but significantly worse in overall survival (OS) and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) (5-year OS, 94.3% vs. 90.5%; p < 0.001 and 5-year BCSS, 94.7% vs. 91.8%; p=0.031). In the multivariate model, age ≥ 65 years old was identified as an independent risk factor for OS and RFS. Conclusion Elderly breast cancer appeared to have worse outcomes with very low prevalence in Korea, despite similar tumor characteristics. More active adjuvant therapies would have a role for aggressive subtypes for fit, elderly patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • HISTOPATHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF BREAST CANCER IN ELDERLY KURDISH WOMEN
    Kamal Saeed, Shewaz Salih
    JOURNAL OF SULAIMANI MEDICAL COLLEGE.2023; 13(4): 11.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the tumor characteristics in young age breast cancer patients using collaborative stage data of the Korea Central Cancer Registry
    Junyup Kim, Seri Hong, Jae Jun Lee, Young-Joo Won, Eun Sook Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Seeyoun Lee, Jai Hong Han, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Heein Jo, Hyun Hee Kim, So-Youn Jung
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 187(3): 785.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes in elderly Taiwanese women according to breast cancer subtype and lymph node status: A single-center retrospective study
    Kung-Hung Lin, Huan-Ming Hsu, Kuo-Feng Hsu, Chi-Hong Chu, Zhi-Jie Hong, Chun-Yu Fu, Yu-Ching Chou, Golshan Mehra, Ming-Shen Dai, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Guo-Shiou Liao, Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(12): e0261258.     CrossRef
  • Could lymph node evaluation be eliminated in nearly 50% of women with early stage ER/PR positive breast cancer?
    Juan Ruiz, Gerson Maldonado, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Jared Reyes, Karson Quinn, Patty L. Tenofsky
    The American Journal of Surgery.2020; 220(6): 1417.     CrossRef
  • Overall survival of elderly patients with breast cancer is not related to breast-cancer specific survival: A single institution experience in Japan
    Haruko Takuwa, Wakako Tsuji, Fumiaki Yotsumoto
    Breast Disease.2018; 37(4): 177.     CrossRef
  • Observational study of coagulation activation in early breast cancer: development of a prognostic model based on data from the real world setting
    Chiara Mandoj, Laura Pizzuti, Domenico Sergi, Isabella Sperduti, Marco Mazzotta, Luigi Di Lauro, Antonella Amodio, Silvia Carpano, Anna Di Benedetto, Claudio Botti, Francesca Ferranti, Anna Antenucci, Maria Gabriella D’Alessandro, Paolo Marchetti, Silveri
    Journal of Translational Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do site and type of metastasis in breast cancer show a changing pattern with increased age? A cross comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between age groups
    Majid Akrami, Afrooz Sepahdar, Peyman Arasteh, Sedigheh Tahmasebi, Vahid Zangouri, Azam Askari, Babak Pezeshki, Abdolrasoul Talei
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting Nodal Positivity in Women 70 Years of Age and Older with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer to Aid Incorporation of a Society of Surgical Oncology Choosing Wisely Guideline into Clinical Practice
    Jessemae L. Welsh, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Elizabeth B. Habermann, Matthew P. Goetz, Judy C. Boughey
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2017; 24(10): 2881.     CrossRef
  • Combination of 125I brachytherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable recurrent breast cancer
    Qixing Tan, Qinghong Qin, Weiping Yang, Bin Lian, Qinguo Mo, Changyuan Wei
    Medicine.2016; 95(44): e5302.     CrossRef
  • 12,680 View
  • 156 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Association between Mutation and Expression of TP53 as a Potential Prognostic Marker of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyunghee Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Eunjin Lee, Eun Yoon Cho, Kwang Hee Lee, Soo Youn Bae, Se Kyung Lee, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1338-1350.   Published online February 18, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.430
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
TP53, the most frequently mutated gene in breast cancer, is more frequently altered in HER2-enriched and basal-like breast cancer. However, no studies have clarified the role of TP53 status as a prognostic and predictive marker of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Materials and Methods
We performed p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC), nCounter mRNA expression assay, and DNA sequencing to determine the relationship between TP53 alteration and clinical outcomes of TNBC patients.
Results
Seventy-seven of 174 TNBC patients were found to harbor a TP53 mutation. Patients with missense mutations showed high protein expression in contrast to patients with deletion mutations (positivity of IHC: wild type vs. missense vs. deletion mutation, 53.6% vs. 89.8% vs. 25.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). TP53 mRNA expression was influenced by mutation status (mRNA expression [median]: wild type vs. missense vs. deletion mutation, 207.36± 132.73 vs. 339.61±143.21 vs. 99.53±99.57,respectively; p < 0.001). According to survival analysis, neither class of mutation nor protein or mRNA expression status had any impact on patient prognosis. In subgroup analysis, low mRNA expression was associated with poor prognosis in patientswith a TP53 missense mutation (5-year distantrecurrence-free survival [5Y DRFS]: low vs. high, 50.0% vs. 87.8%; p=0.009), while high mRNA expression with a TP53 deletion mutation indicated poor prognosis (5Y DRFS: low vs. high, 91.7% vs. 75.0%; p=0.316).
Conclusion
Association between TP53 mutation and expression indicates a potential prognostic marker of TNBC; hence both DNA sequencing and mRNA expression analysis may be required to predict the prognosis of TNBC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunohistochemical Characterization of a Large Cohort of Triple Negative Breast Cancer
    Rachel Han, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Dina Boles, Hannah Wu, Nikolina Curcin, Elzbieta Slodkowska
    International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2024; 32(2): 239.     CrossRef
  • Exploring Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Hallmarks of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up in Clinical Practice
    Laura Lopez-Gonzalez, Alicia Sanchez Cendra, Cristina Sanchez Cendra, Eduardo David Roberts Cervantes, Javier Cassinello Espinosa, Tatiana Pekarek, Oscar Fraile-Martinez, Cielo García-Montero, Ana María Rodriguez-Slocker, Laura Jiménez-Álvarez, Luis G. Gu
    Medicina.2024; 60(1): 168.     CrossRef
  • TP53R175H mutation promotes breast cancer cell proliferation through CORO1A–P38 MAPK pathway regulation
    Yali Su, Jiaxuan Zhao, Haoran Fu, Zeliang Liu, Panyan Du, Jianxia Zheng, Jinghua Wu, Jinghua Zhang
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2024; 221: 116047.     CrossRef
  • TP53 and/or BRCA1 Mutations Based on CtDNA Analysis as Prognostic Biomarkers for Primary Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Akiko Arimura, Kazuko Sakai, Kazuhisa Kaneshiro, Takafumi Morisaki, Saori Hayashi, Kimihisa Mizoguchi, Mai Yamada, Masaya Kai, Mayumi Ono, Kazuto Nishio, Masafumi Nakamura, Makoto Kubo
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1184.     CrossRef
  • Exploration of newly synthesized deferasirox derivatives as potential anti-cancer agents via in-vitro and in-silico approaches
    Muhammad Zahid Ullah, Zahid Hussain, Syed Ahmad Shakir, Mahnoor Mahmood, Syeda Abida Ejaz, Mubashir Aziz, Ammara Fayyaz, Jamshed Iqbal, Amara Mumtaz
    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.2024; 283: 137971.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Zhijun Li, Yiqun Han, Jiayu Wang, Binghe Xu
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(2): 190.     CrossRef
  • The role of p53 and ki67 in predicting clinical outcome in breast cancer patients
    Bhanu Prakash Lalkota, B.J Srinivasa, Mani V. Swamy, Diganta Hazarika, B.M Jeet, K Jyothi, Mithua Ghosh, Suhail M. Sayeed, Mohammad Nasiruddin, Radheshyam Naik
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2023; 19(2): 208.     CrossRef
  • Novel microtubule inhibitor SQ overcomes multidrug resistance in MCF-7/ADR cells by inhibiting BCRP function and mediating apoptosis
    Xing Chang, Zi Liu, Simeng Cao, Jiang Bian, Dayong Zheng, Nuo Wang, Qi Guan, Yingliang Wu, Weige Zhang, Zengqiang Li, Daiying Zuo
    Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.2022; 436: 115883.     CrossRef
  • Targeted gene next‐generation sequencing reveals genomic profile in a cohort of 46 Chinese patients with breast cancer
    Jie Yao, Qian Chen, Jun‐qi Zhu, Rui‐gang Cai
    The Journal of Gene Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of the elastin-derived peptides (VGVAPG and VVGPGA) on breast (MCF-7) and lung (A549) cancer cell lines in vitro
    Konrad A. Szychowski, Bartosz Skóra, Tadeusz Pomianek
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2022; 151: 113149.     CrossRef
  • p53 Missense Mutation is Associated with Immune Cell PD-L1 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Ai-Yan Xing, Long Liu, Ke Liang, Bin Wang
    Cancer Investigation.2022; 40(10): 879.     CrossRef
  • Checkpoint Kinase 1 (CHK1) Functions as Both a Diagnostic Marker and a Regulator of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hyo-Jin Kim, Bo-Gyeong Seo, Eun-Chan Seo, Kwang-Min Lee, Cheol Hwangbo
    Current Issues in Molecular Biology.2022; 44(12): 5848.     CrossRef
  • An integrative pan-cancer analysis of COPB1 based on data mining
    Heyan Chen, Kunlong Li, Yijun Li, Peilin Xie, Jianjun He, Huimin Zhang
    Cancer Biomarkers.2021; 30(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Sex differences in expression of immune elements emerge in children, young adults and mice with osteosarcoma
    Lauren J. Mills, Logan G. Spector, David A. Largaespada, Lindsay A. Williams
    Biology of Sex Differences.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • GATA3 as an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: A Study with a Review of the Literature
    Patrizia Querzoli, Massimo Pedriali, Rosa Rinaldi, Paola Secchiero, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Elisabetta Kuhn
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(4): 604.     CrossRef
  • Oncogenic and Tumor Suppressive Components of the Cell Cycle in Breast Cancer Progression and Prognosis
    Dharambir Kashyap, Vivek Kumar Garg, Elise N. Sandberg, Neelam Goel, Anupam Bishayee
    Pharmaceutics.2021; 13(4): 569.     CrossRef
  • Characterization of Frequently Mutated Cancer Genes and Tumor Mutation Burden in Chinese Breast Cancer
    Weikai Xiao, Guochun Zhang, Bo Chen, Xiaoqing Chen, Lingzhu Wen, Jianguo Lai, Xuerui Li, Min Li, Hao Liu, Jing Liu, Han Han-Zhang, Analyn Lizaso, Ning Liao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Syndrome de Peutz–Jeghers et surveillance mammaire : les nouvelles recommandations à propos d’une observation
    M. Osada, P. Maniez, N. Taris, C. Mathelin
    Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie .2021; 49(10): 795.     CrossRef
  • Curcumin: Modulator of Key Molecular Signaling Pathways in Hormone-Independent Breast Cancer
    Reyhaneh Farghadani, Rakesh Naidu
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3427.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) and SP600125, a JNK Inhibitor, on Wnt Signaling in Canine Prostate Cancer Growth and Bone Metastases
    Wachiraphan Supsavhad, Bardes B. Hassan, Jessica K. Simmons, Wessel P. Dirksen, Said M. Elshafae, Nicole A. Kohart, Aylin A. Demirer, Thomas J. Rosol
    Veterinary Sciences.2021; 8(8): 153.     CrossRef
  • TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines
    Ashkan Shahbandi, Hoang D. Nguyen, James G. Jackson
    Trends in Cancer.2020; 6(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • The novel TP53 3′-end methylation pattern associated with its expression would be a potential biomarker for breast cancer detection
    Feng Zeng, Jianfu Heng, Xinwu Guo, Yue Wang, Wenhan Wu, Lili Tang, Min Chen, Shouman Wang, Hongyu Deng, Jun Wang
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 180(1): 237.     CrossRef
  • Clinical spectrum and prognostic value of TP53 mutations in circulating tumor DNA from breast cancer patients in China
    Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Guohua Rong, Yanfang Guan, Chunxiao Li, Binghe Xu
    Cancer Communications.2020; 40(6): 260.     CrossRef
  • Gain-of-Function Mutant p53 R273H Interacts with Replicating DNA and PARP1 in Breast Cancer
    Gu Xiao, Devon Lundine, George K. Annor, Jorge Canar, Viola Ellison, Alla Polotskaia, Patrick L. Donabedian, Thomas Reiner, Galina F. Khramtsova, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Alexander Mazo, Jill Bargonetti
    Cancer Research.2020; 80(3): 394.     CrossRef
  • Genomic analysis of racial differences in triple negative breast cancer
    Chang-Sheng Chang, Eiko Kitamura, Joan Johnson, Roni Bollag, Lesleyann Hawthorn
    Genomics.2019; 111(6): 1529.     CrossRef
  • p53 expression status is associated with cancer-specific survival in stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy
    Hyeon Jeong Oh, Jeong Mo Bae, Xianyu Wen, Seorin Jung, Younghoon Kim, Kyung Ju Kim, Nam-Yun Cho, Jung Ho Kim, Sae-Won Han, Tae-You Kim, Gyeong Hoon Kang
    British Journal of Cancer.2019; 120(8): 797.     CrossRef
  • Immunostaining for p53 and p16CDKN2A Protein Is Not Predictive of Prognosis for Dogs with Malignant Mammary Gland Neoplasms
    John S Munday, Harsha Ariyarathna, Danielle Aberdein, Neroli A Thomson
    Veterinary Sciences.2019; 6(1): 34.     CrossRef
  • NUP98 – a novel predictor of response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
    Paul B. Mullan, Victoria Bingham, Paula Haddock, Gareth W. Irwin, Elaine Kay, Stephen McQuaid, Niamh E. Buckley
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of p53 expression with poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma
    Jing-ping Li, Xiang-mei Zhang, Zhenzhen Zhang, Li-hua Zheng, Sonali Jindal, Yun-jiang Liu
    Medicine.2019; 98(18): e15449.     CrossRef
  • Elevated levels of eEF1A2 protein expression in triple negative breast cancer relate with poor prognosis
    Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Petracci, Oriana Nanni, Cristina Bottin, Maurizio Pinamonti, Fabrizio Zanconati, Bruna Scaggiante, Aamir Ahmad
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(6): e0218030.     CrossRef
  • Mutational analysis of triple-negative breast cancers within the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial 22-00
    Elisabetta Munzone, Kathryn P. Gray, Caterina Fumagalli, Elena Guerini-Rocco, István Láng, Thomas Ruhstaller, Lorenzo Gianni, Roswitha Kammler, Giuseppe Viale, Angelo Di Leo, Alan S. Coates, Richard D. Gelber, Meredith M. Regan, Aron Goldhirsch, Massimo B
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 170(2): 351.     CrossRef
  • Cold atmospheric plasma conveys selectivity on triple negative breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo
    Liangjian Xiang, Xiaoyu Xu, Shuo Zhang, Dongyan Cai, Xiaofeng Dai
    Free Radical Biology and Medicine.2018; 124: 205.     CrossRef
  • Genetic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Zuzana Sporikova, Vladimira Koudelakova, Radek Trojanec, Marian Hajduch
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2018; 18(5): e841.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of immunohistochemically detected p53 in adjuvant chemotherapy‐treated triple negative breast cancer
    Soo Youn Bae, Seung Pil Jung, Se Kyung Lee, Jonghan Yu, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam
    The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2018; 34(12): 663.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of CD117 expression and TP53 missense mutations in triple-negative breast cancer
    Yanli Luo, Wentao Huang, Huizhen Zhang, Guang Liu
    Oncology Letters.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • P53 and Ki-67 as prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer patients
    Yunbao Pan, Yufen Yuan, Guoshi Liu, Yongchang Wei, William B. Coleman
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(2): e0172324.     CrossRef
  • Alcohol promotes migration and invasion of triple‐negative breast cancer cells through activation of p38 MAPK and JNK
    Ming Zhao, Erin W. Howard, Amanda B. Parris, Zhiying Guo, Qingxia Zhao, Xiaohe Yang
    Molecular Carcinogenesis.2017; 56(3): 849.     CrossRef
  • Landscape of somatic mutations in different subtypes of advanced breast cancer with circulating tumor DNA analysis
    Zongbi Yi, Fei Ma, Chunxiao Li, Rongrong Chen, Lifang Yuan, Xiaoying Sun, Xiuwen Guan, Lixi Li, Binliang Liu, Yanfang Guan, Haili Qian, Binghe Xu
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • TP53 gene expression levels and tumor aggressiveness in canine mammary carcinomas
    Táya F. Oliveira, Tábata Maués, Mariana S. Ramundo, Agnes Marie S. Figueiredo, Marcela F. V. de Mello, Kênia B. El-Jaick, Maria de Lourdes G. Ferreira, Ana Maria R. Ferreira
    Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation.2017; 29(6): 865.     CrossRef
  • Overexpression of p53 protein is a marker of poor prognosis in Mexican women with breast cancer
    Jisela Dimas-González, Vilma Maldonado-Lagunas, José Díaz-Chávez, María Eugenia López-Arellano, José Muñoz-Camacho, Marco Antonio Terán-Porcayo, Alfredo Lagunas-Martínez
    Oncology Reports.2017; 37(5): 3026.     CrossRef
  • Genomic comparison of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions by multi-region whole-exome sequencing
    Xi-Xi Chen, Qian Zhong, Yang Liu, Shu-Mei Yan, Zhang-Hua Chen, Shan-Zhao Jin, Tian-Liang Xia, Ruo-Yan Li, Ai-Jun Zhou, Zhe Su, Yu-Hua Huang, Qi-Tao Huang, Li-Yun Huang, Xing Zhang, Yan-Na Zhao, Jin-Ping Yun, Qiu-Liang Wu, Dong-Xin Lin, Fan Bai, Mu-Sheng Z
    Nature Communications.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implications of genomic profiles in metastatic breast cancer with a focus on TP53 and PIK3CA, the most frequently mutated genes
    Ji-Yeon Kim, Eunjin Lee, Kyunghee Park, Woong-Yang Park, Hae Hyun Jung, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(17): 27997.     CrossRef
  • miR-34a expression in human breast cancer is associated with drug resistance
    Zhi-Hua Li, Xueling Weng, Qiu-Yun Xiong, Jian-Hong Tu, An Xiao, Wei Qiu, Yu Gong, Er-Wei Hu, Songyin Huang, Ya-Li Cao
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(63): 106270.     CrossRef
  • Coexistent Loss of the Expressions of BRCA1 and p53 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Min Chong Kim, Jung Eun Choi, Soo Jung Lee, Young Kyung Bae
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2016; 23(11): 3524.     CrossRef
  • 2-Methoxy-5((3,4,5-trimethosyphenyl)seleninyl) phenol inhibits MDM2 and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells through a p53-independent pathway
    Jingwen Xu, Mengting Han, Jiwei Shen, Qi Guan, Zhaoshi Bai, Binyue Lang, Huijuan Zhang, Zengqiang Li, Daiying Zuo, Weige Zhang, Yingliang Wu
    Cancer Letters.2016; 383(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • 17,389 View
  • 336 Download
  • 52 Web of Science
  • 45 Crossref
Close layer
Analysis of BRIP1 Variants among Korean Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation-Negative High-Risk Breast Cancer
Haeyoung Kim, Dae-Yeon Cho, Doo Ho Choi, Gee Hue Jung, Inkyung Shin, Won Park, Seung Jae Huh, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee, Won Ho Gil, Seok Won Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):955-961.   Published online January 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.191
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of the current study is to assess the spectrum of genetic variation in the BRIP1 gene among Korean high-risk breast cancer patients who tested negative for the BRCA1/2 mutation.
Materials and Methods
Overall, 235 Korean patientswith BRCA1/2 mutation–negative high-risk breast cancerwere screened for BRIP1 mutations. The entire BRIP1 gene was analyzed using fluorescent-conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis. In silico analysis of BRIP1 variants was performed using PolyPhen-2 and SIFT.
Results
A total of 20 sequence alterations including 12 exonic and eight intronic variantswere found. Among the 12 exonic variants, 10 were missense and two were silent mutations. No protein-truncating mutation was found among the tested patients. Among the 10 missense variants, four (p.L263F, p.L340F, p.L474P, and p.R848H) were predicted to be pathogenic by both PolyPhen-2 and SIFT, and these variants were found in five patients. Of the four missense variants, p.L263F, p.L474P, and p.R848H localize to regions between the helicase motifs, while p.L340F resides in an iron-sulfur domain of BRIP1.
Conclusion
No protein-truncating mutation in BRIP1 was found among the tested patients. The contribution of BRIP1 variants is thought to be minor in Korean non-BRCA1/2 high-risk breast cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identification of pathogenic germline variants in a large Chinese lung cancer cohort by clinical sequencing
    Zhe Yu, Zirui Zhang, Jun Liu, Xiaoying Wu, Xiaojun Fan, Jiaohui Pang, Hua Bao, Jiani Yin, Xue Wu, Yang Shao, Zhengcheng Liu, Fang Liu
    Molecular Oncology.2024; 18(5): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Iron–Sulfur Clusters: Assembly and Biological Roles
    Nunziata Maio
    Inorganics.2024; 12(8): 216.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of 17 genetic variants in association with leukemia in the north Indian population using MassARRAY Sequenom
    Amrita Bhat, Gh. Rasool Bhat, Sonali Verma, Bhanu Sharma, Divya Bakshi, Deepak Abrol, Supinder Singh, Raies Ahmed Qadri, Ruchi Shah, Rakesh Kumar
    Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer-associated mutations in the iron-sulfur domain of FANCJ affect G-quadruplex metabolism
    Diana C. Odermatt, Wei Ting C. Lee, Sebastian Wild, Stanislaw K. Jozwiakowski, Eli Rothenberg, Kerstin Gari, Andrew Deans
    PLOS Genetics.2020; 16(6): e1008740.     CrossRef
  • Helicase-inactivating BRIP1 mutation yields Fanconi anemia with microcephaly and other congenital abnormalities
    Lara Kamal, Sarah B. Pierce, Christina Canavati, Amal Abu Rayyan, Tamara Jaraysa, Orit Lobel, Suhair Lolas, Barbara M. Norquist, Grace Rabie, Fouad Zahdeh, Ephrat Levy-Lahad, Mary-Claire King, Moien N. Kanaan
    Molecular Case Studies.2020; 6(5): a005652.     CrossRef
  • Variants of cancer susceptibility genes in Korean BRCA1/2 mutation-negative patients with high risk for hereditary breast cancer
    Ji Soo Park, Seung-Tae Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Jung Woo Han, Jung-Yun Lee, Jieun Kim, Tae Il Kim, Hyung Seok Park
    BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mutation status of RAD51C,PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese familial breast cancer cases without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
    Katsutoshi Sato, Mio Koyasu, Sachio Nomura, Yuri Sato, Mizuho Kita, Yuumi Ashihara, Yasue Adachi, Shinji Ohno, Takuji Iwase, Dai Kitagawa, Eri Nakashima, Reiko Yoshida, Yoshio Miki, Masami Arai
    Cancer Science.2017; 108(11): 2287.     CrossRef
  • Mutational analysis of FANCJ helicase
    Manhong Guo, Venkatasubramanian Vidhyasagar, Tanu Talwar, Ahmad Kariem, Yuliang Wu
    Methods.2016; 108: 118.     CrossRef
  • 14,275 View
  • 242 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
Close layer
Effect of Time Interval between Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy on Outcomes of Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Taxane
Hyeon Kang Koh, Kyung Hwan Shin, Kyubo Kim, Eun Sook Lee, In Hae Park, Keun Seok Lee, Jungsil Ro, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Seok Won Kim, Han-Sung Kang, Eui Kyu Chie, Wonshik Han, Dong-Young Noh, Kyung-Hun Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Sung Whan Ha
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):483-490.   Published online June 5, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.111
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
This study evaluated the effect of surgery-radiotherapy interval (SRI) on outcomes in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by four cycles of taxane. Materials and Methods From 1999 to 2007, 397 eligible patients were diagnosed. The effect of SRI on outcomes was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, and a maximal chi-square method was used to identify optimal cut-off value of SRI for each outcome.
Results
The median SRI was 6.7 months (range, 5.6 to 10.3 months). A SRI of 7 months was the significant cut-off value for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using a maximal chi-square method. For overall survival, a significant cut-off value was not found. The patients with SRI > 7 months had worse 6-year DMFS and DFS than those with SRI ≤ 7 months on univariate analysis (DMFS, 81% vs. 91%, p=0.003; DFS, 78% vs. 89%, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, SRI > 7 months did not affect DMFS and DFS. Conclusion RT delayed for more than 7 months after BCS and adjuvant four cycles of AC followed by four cycles of taxane did not compromise clinical outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • MiR-210 regulates lung adenocarcinoma by targeting HIF-1α
    Guolei Cao, Peiwen Fan, Ronghui Ma, Qinghe Wang, Lili He, Haiwen Niu, Qin Luo
    Heliyon.2023; 9(5): e16079.     CrossRef
  • Timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy following adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: A post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled clinical trial
    Si-Ye Chen, Guang-Yi Sun, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Xu-Ran Zhao, Yu-Chun Song, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning Lu, Ning Li, Hui Fang, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang
    European Journal of Cancer.2022; 174: 153.     CrossRef
  • Timing of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Following Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Breast Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
    Si-Ye Chen, Guang-Yi Sun, Yu Tang, Hao Jing, Yong-Wen Song, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Xu-Ran Zhao, Yu-Chun Song, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning Lu, Ning Li, Hui Fang, Ye-Xiong Li, Shu-Lian Wang
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Social Determinants of Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality Among Black and White Women
    Oluwole Adeyemi Babatunde, Jan M. Eberth, Tisha Felder, Robert Moran, Samantha Truman, James R. Hebert, Jiajia Zhang, Swann Arp Adams
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.2021; 8(1): 147.     CrossRef
  • How Does the Interval Between Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Initiation of Radiotherapy Impact Clinical Outcomes in Operable Breast Cancer Patients?
    Lu Cao, Cheng Xu, Gang Cai, Wei-Xiang Qi, Rong Cai, Shu-Bei Wang, Dan Ou, Min Li, Kun-Wei Shen, Jia-Yi Chen
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(4): 2155.     CrossRef
  • Saving the Breast Saves the Lives of Breast Cancer Patients
    Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Maryam Khayamzadeh, Hamid Reza Mirzaei, Afshin Moradi, Atieh Akbari, Farid Moradian, Neda Khalili
    International Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Timing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
    Si-Ye Chen, Yu Tang, Shu-Lian Wang, Yong-Wen Song, Hui Fang, Jian-Yang Wang, Hao Jing, Jiang-Hu Zhang, Guang-Yi Sun, Xu-Ran Zhao, Jing Jin, Yue-Ping Liu, Bo Chen, Shu-Nan Qi, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Ning-Ning Lu, Hua Ren, Zi-Hao Yu, Ye-Xiong Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of tissue computed tomography number changes and dosimetric shifts after conventional whole-breast irradiation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery
    Joo Hwan Lee, Dong Soo Lee, So Hyun Park, Young Kyu Lee, Jeong Soo Kim, Yong Seok Kim
    Tumor Biology.2018; 40(8): 101042831879188.     CrossRef
  • The influence of timing of radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery on 10-year disease-free survival
    Marissa C van Maaren, Reini W Bretveld, Jan J Jobsen, Renske K Veenstra, Catharina GM Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Hendrik Struikmans, John H Maduro, Luc JA Strobbe, Philip MP Poortmans, Sabine Siesling
    British Journal of Cancer.2017; 117(2): 179.     CrossRef
  • 11,528 View
  • 126 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer
Impact on Survival of Regular Postoperative Surveillance for Patients with Early Breast Cancer
Ji Yun Lee, Sung Hee Lim, Min-Young Lee, Haesu Kim, Moonjin Kim, Sungmin Kim, Hyun Ae Jung, Insuk Sohn, Won Ho Gil, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(4):765-773.   Published online January 13, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.168
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of regular postoperative surveillance to improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer after curative surgery. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 4,119 patients who received curative surgery for breast cancer at Samsung Medical Center between January 2000 and September 2008. Patients were divided into two groups (group I, regular postoperative surveillance; group II, control group) according to their post-therapy follow-up status for the first 5 years after surgery. Results Among the 3,770 patients selected for inclusion, groups I and II contained 3,300 (87%) and 470 (13%) patients, respectively. The recurrence rates at 5 years for groups I and II were 10.6% and 16.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 1.09; p=0.197). The 10-year mortality cumulative rates were 8.8% for group I and 25.4% for group II (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.35; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS), age over 40 years (p < 0.001), histologic grade 1 (p < 0.001), and pathologic stage I (p < 0.001) were associated with longer RFS but not with follow- up status. Multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed that patients in group I showed significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.37; p < 0.001). Additionally, age over 40 years, histologic grade I, and pathologic stage I were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion Regular follow-up for patients with breast cancer after primary surgery resulted in clinically significant improvements in patient OS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Follow-up strategy and survival for five common cancers: A meta-analysis
    Boris Galjart, Diederik J. Höppener, Joachim G.J.V. Aerts, Christiaan H. Bangma, Cornelis Verhoef, Dirk J. Grünhagen
    European Journal of Cancer.2022; 174: 185.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Features and Outcomes of Invasive Breast Cancer: Age-Specific Analysis of a Modern Hospital-Based Registry
    Ji-Yeon Kim, Danbee Kang, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jong Han Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Eliseo Guallar, Juhee Cho, Yeon Hee Park
    Journal of Global Oncology.2019; (5): 1.     CrossRef
  • Follow-Up Recommendations after Curative Resection of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours: Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Practice
    Angela Lamarca, Hamish Clouston, Jorge Barriuso, Mairéad G McNamara, Melissa Frizziero, Was Mansoor, Richard A Hubner, Prakash Manoharan, Sarah O’Dwyer, Juan W Valle
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(10): 1630.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of patient-detected breast cancer recurrence
    Trishul Kapoor, Sean Wrenn, Peter Callas, Ted A. James
    Breast Disease.2017; 37(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • 12,099 View
  • 89 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP