Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Keeho Park"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Articles
General
The Fear of Cancer from the Standpoint of Oneself, the Opposite Sex and the Fear of Side Effects of Cancer Treatment
Keeho Park, Youngae Kim, Hyung Kook Yang, Hye Sook Min
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):993-1001.   Published online June 24, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.285
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
It is important to understand the differences between men and women when it comes to attitudes and risk perception toward disease. This study aimed to explore the fear of cancer from the standpoint of themselves and the opposite sex by cancer type.
Materials and Methods
A cross-sectional survey with a representative sample was conducted.
Results
The least and the most feared cancers in men were thyroid cancer and lung cancer, respectively. When men assumed the perspective of women, the least and the most feared cancer were thyroid cancer and stomach cancer, respectively. The least and the most feared cancers in women were thyroid cancer and stomach cancer, respectively. When women assumed the perspective of men, the least and the most feared cancer were prostate cancer and lung cancer, respectively. When both men and women assume the perspective of the opposite sex, the fear of sex-specific cancer was relatively low compared to the actual responses of both men and women. The top six of the most feared side effects of cancer treatment were pain, psychological problems, general weakness, digestive dysfunction, fatigue, and appearance change. These were the same between men and women.
Conclusion
Health care providers and caregivers in the family should provide care with more attention to the differences in thoughts about cancer between men and women. Health care providers should provide care with more attention to the differences in these problems between men and women.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • “Teetering on a Tightrope”: Uncertainty and Information Management During the Cancer Pre-Diagnosis Phase
    Lisa Glebatis Perks, Andrew C. Tollison
    Western Journal of Communication.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • 7,199 View
  • 187 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
Socioeconomic Burden of Cancer in Korea from 2011 to 2015
Young Ae Kim, Ye-Rin Lee, Jeongjoo Park, In-Hwan Oh, Hoseob Kim, Seok-Jun Yoon, Keeho Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(3):896-906.   Published online March 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.398
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Though the socioeconomic burden of cancer on patients is increasing in South Korea, there is little research regarding the type of cancer that incurs the highest costs. This study analyzed the socioeconomic burden on cancer patients from 2011 to 2015 according to sex and age.
Materials and Methods
A prevalence-based approach was applied utilizing claim data of the National Health Insurance Service in Korea to estimate the socioeconomic burden of cancer on patients. Patients who received treatment for cancer from 2011 to 2015 were the study subjects. The total socioeconomic burden of their disease and treatment was divided into direct and indirect costs.
Results
There was an increase of 50.7% for 5 years, from 821,525 to 1,237,739 cancer patients. The cancer costs for men and women increased $8,268.4 million to $9,469.7 million and $3,626.5 million to $4,475.6 million, respectively. Furthermore, the 50-59-year-old age group accounted for a large portion of the total disease cost. Liver, lung, stomach, and colorectal cancers created the heaviest economic burdens on patients.
Conclusion
Overall, this study indicates new policies for cancer prevention, early detection, and postcancer treatment management are necessary to help limit the costs associatedwith cancer, especially in the elderly, and provides a foundation for establishing cancer-related health care policies, particularly by defining those cancers with heavier disease burdens.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Trends in Cancer-Screening Rates in Korea: Findings from the National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2023
    EunKyo Kang, Kui Son Choi, Jae Kwan Jun, Yeol Kim, Hyeon Ji Lee, Chang Kyun Choi, Tae Hee Kim, Sun Hwa Lee, Mina Suh
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Socioeconomic Burden of Psychiatric Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review
    Gniewko Więckiewicz, Sophie Weber, Iga Florczyk, Piotr Gorczyca
    Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1108.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Nivolumab and Regorafenib as Second-line Systemic Therapies after Sorafenib Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hong Jun Lee, Jae Seung Lee, Hyesung So, Ja Kyung Yoon, Jin-Young Choi, Hye Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Jun Yong Park, Sang Hoon Ahn, Do Young Kim
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2024; 65(7): 371.     CrossRef
  • Impact of early economic activity loss on all-cause mortality in gastric cancer survivors following curative treatment: a nationwide study in Korea
    Byungyoon Yun, Juyeon Oh, Heejoo Park, Jinsoo Chung, Juho Sim, Jongmin Lee, Yangwook Kim, Jin-Ha Yoon
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(6): 1159.     CrossRef
  • Economic Burden of Healthcare Services on Cancer Survivors in Bangladesh
    Md. Shahjalal, Padam Kanta Dahal, Md. Parvez Mosharaf, Mohammad Morshad Alam, Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader, Rashidul Alam Mahumud
    Cancer Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High-Dose Corticosteroid Use in Severe to Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Nationwide Population-Based Matched Cohort Study
    Raeseok Lee, Sung-Yeon Cho, Dong-Gun Lee, Dukhee Nho
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Viral Etiology
    Jae Yeon Lee, Min Jung Geum, Jong Hee Ko, Eun Sun Son, Yun Mi Yu
    Journal of Korean Society of Health-System Pharmacists.2024; 41(4): 354.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Journal of Liver Cancer.2023; 23(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of dysphagia requiring medical attention in various types of cancers: A nationwide population-based cohort study
    SuYeon Kwon, Gowun Kim, Seungwoo Cha, Kyungdo Han, Nam-Jong Paik, Won-Seok Kim
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Economic burden of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in Japan
    Eiko Saito, Shiori Tanaka, Sarah Krull Abe, Mayo Hirayabashi, Junko Ishihara, Kota Katanoda, Yingsong Lin, Chisato Nagata, Norie Sawada, Ribeka Takachi, Atsushi Goto, Junko Tanaka, Kayo Ueda, Megumi Hori, Tomohiro Matsuda, Manami Inoue
    Global Health & Medicine.2023; 5(4): 238.     CrossRef
  • Operational Definitions of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean National Health Insurance Database
    Hyeree Park, Yu Rim Kim, Yerin Pyun, Hyundeok Joo, Aesun Shin
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2023; 56(4): 312.     CrossRef
  • The effects of hospice care on healthcare expenditure among cancer patients
    Hoyol Jhang, Wonjeong Jeong, Hyun-Soo Zhang, Dong-Woo Choi, Hyejung Kang, Sohee Park
    BMC Health Services Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of Cancer Diagnosis Based on the National Health Insurance Service Database versus the National Cancer Registry Database in Korea
    Min Soo Yang, Minae Park, Joung Hwan Back, Gyeong Hyeon Lee, Ji Hye Shin, Kyuwoong Kim, Hwa Jeong Seo, Young Ae Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2022; 54(2): 352.     CrossRef
  • Income Disparities in Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013–2019
    Vasuki Rajaguru, Tae Hyun Kim, Jaeyong Shin, Sang Gyu Lee
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The cost of oral cancer: A systematic review
    Rejane Faria Ribeiro-Rotta, Eduardo Antônio Rosa, Vanessa Milani, Nadielle Rodrigues Dias, Danielle Masterson, Everton Nunes da Silva, Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio Zara, Antoine Eskander
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266346.     CrossRef
  • The effect of cancer on traditional, complementary and alternative medicine utilization in Korea: a fixed effect analysis using Korea Health Panel data
    Dongsu Kim, Soo-Hyun Sung, Seungwon Shin, Minjung Park
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Trend Analysis and Prediction of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea
    Hyeong Min Park, Young-Joo Won, Mee Joo Kang, Sang-Jae Park, Sun-Whe Kim, Kyu-Won Jung, Sung-Sik Han
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The population-level economic burden of liver cancer in China, 2019–2030: prevalence-based estimations from a societal perspective
    Meng-Di Cao, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Hong Wang, Lin Lei, Maomao Cao, Yuting Wang, He Li, Xin-Xin Yan, Yan-Jie Li, Xin Wang, Ji Peng, Chunfeng Qu, Eleonora Feletto, Ju-Fang Shi, Wanqing Chen
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea
    Diego Novick, Sae Young Lee, Dong Hyun Koo, Agota Szende, Sam Colman
    Journal of Drug Assessment.2022; 11(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2022; 28(4): 583.     CrossRef
  • 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Korean Journal of Radiology.2022; 23(12): 1126.     CrossRef
  • Trends in breast cancer screening rates among Korean women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2005-2020
    Soo Yeon Song, Yun Yeong Lee, Hye Young Shin, Bomi Park, Mina Suh, Kui Son Choi, Jae Kwan Jun
    Epidemiology and Health.2022; 44: e2022111.     CrossRef
  • Mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
    Hye-Young Min, Ho-Young Lee
    Archives of Pharmacal Research.2021; 44(2): 146.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Medical Use and Treatment Costs of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Using National Patient Sample Data
    Byeong-Chan Oh, Jeong-Yeon Cho, Sun-Hong Kwon, Eui-Kyung Lee, Hye-Lin Kim
    Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2021; 31(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • Liver Stiffness-Based Risk Prediction Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
    Jae Seung Lee, Dong Hyun Sinn, Soo Young Park, Hye Jung Shin, Hye Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Joo Hyun Oh, Jung Il Lee, Seung Up Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(18): 4567.     CrossRef
  • Economic burden of alcohol-related cancers in the Republic of Korea
    Minji Han, Binh Thang Tran, Heeyoun Cho, Jin-Kyoung Oh
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence.2020; 217: 108295.     CrossRef
  • 11,419 View
  • 260 Download
  • 26 Web of Science
  • 26 Crossref
Close layer
What We Talk about When We Talk about Caregiving: The Distribution of Roles in Cancer Patient Caregiving in a Family-Oriented Culture
Ansuk Jeong, Dongwook Shin, Jong Hyock Park, Keeho Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(1):141-149.   Published online March 21, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.557
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary MaterialPubReaderePub
Purpose
When it comes to cancer care, the psychological well-being of family caregivers has gotten its deserved attention. However, the specific roles that the family caregivers take have not been examined as much. The current study aimed to investigate the distribution of family caregivers’ roles, particularly in a family-oriented culture, Korea.
Materials and Methods
A sample of 439 participants was recruited from 11 national and regional cancer centers in Korea. The participants who were 60 years old or above went through treatments for their gastric, colorectal, or lung cancer. The individual survey included questions regarding the family type, living arrangement, and the sources of support when it comes to their physical, emotional, financial, and decision-making needs.
Results
The responses from the participants showed that cancer caregiving is shared by multiple family caregivers; the major source of support for elderly cancer patients on diverse domains was their spouse; patients’ reliance on their daughter(s) increased for emotional support; and patients’ reliance on their son(s) stood out for financial support and decision-making support. Also, the older the patients were, the heavier their reliance was on the adult children, including sons, daughters, and daughters-in-law.
Conclusion
Future support programs for elderly cancer patients are suggested to involve multiple family caregivers to encourage effective and efficient intervention. Also, the limitations of the current study and the suggestions for future research are discussed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Exploring the Lived Experiences of Caregiving for Older Family Members by Young Caregivers in Singapore: Transition, Trials, and Tribulations
    Araviinthansai Subramaniam, Kalyani Kirtikar Mehta
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2024; 21(2): 182.     CrossRef
  • Good Together Makes it Better?
    Carolina Blom, Ana Catarina Reis, Leonor Lencastre
    European Journal of Psychology Open.2024; 83(3): 119.     CrossRef
  • Caregiving Strain, family functioning, and effort to change diet for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A cross-sectional descriptive study
    Myung Kyung Lee
    European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2023; 62: 102264.     CrossRef
  • Preferred and actual involvement of caregivers in oncologic treatment decision-making: A systematic review
    Laura M.L. Tielemans, Kirsten D. van Heugten, Marije E. Hamaker, Inez C. van Walree
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(6): 101525.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions for Patients With Cancer and their Family Members: A Systematic Review
    Cristina Alfaro-Díaz, Erla Kolbrun Svavarsdottir, Nuria Esandi, Marianne E. Klinke, Ana Canga-Armayor
    Journal of Family Nursing.2022; 28(2): 95.     CrossRef
  • Active Engagement, Protective Buffering, and Depressive Symptoms in Young-Midlife Couples Surviving Cancer: The Roles of Age and Sex
    Karen S. Lyons, Jessica R. Gorman, Brandon S. Larkin, Grace Duncan, Brandon Hayes-Lattin
    Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring positive experiences of primary and secondary caregivers of older persons in resource-limited urban settings in Accra, Ghana
    Frank Kyei-Arthur, Samuel Nii Ardey Codjoe, Delali Margaret Badasu, Vijayaprasad Gopichandran
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266269.     CrossRef
  • Health practices in Europe towards families of older patients with cancer: a scoping review
    Hanne Konradsen, Anne Brødsgaard, Birte Østergaard, Erla Svavarsdóttir, Karin B. Dieperink, Lorenz Imhof, Marie Louise Luttik, Romy Mahrer‐Imhof, Cristina García‐Vivar
    Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.2021; 35(2): 375.     CrossRef
  • Family Caregivers' Emotional Preparedness for Death is Distinct from Their Cognitive Prognostic Awareness for Cancer Patients
    Siew Tzuh, Wen-Cheng Chang, Wen-Chi Chou, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Jen-Shi Chen, Fur-Hsing Wen
    Journal of Palliative Medicine.2021; 24(3): 405.     CrossRef
  • Exploring perceptions and practices of cancer care among caregivers and care recipients of breast cancer in India
    Shradha S. Parsekar, Ajay Bailey, Binu V. S., Suma Nair
    Psycho-Oncology.2020; 29(4): 737.     CrossRef
  • 8,525 View
  • 183 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Supporting Low-income Cancer Patients: Recommendations for the Public Financial Aid Program in the Republic of Korea
Hye Sook Min, Hyung Kook Yang, Keeho Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1074-1083.   Published online November 15, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.401
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
As the recent term of “financial toxicity” implies, cancer causes a treatment-related financial harm. Financial Aid Program for Cancer Patient (FAPCP) is a government’s financial support for low-income patients in the Republic of Korea. This study aimed to describe FAPCP applicants’ condition and to investigate factors influencing financial burden, which would provide the basis for implementing a strategy for FAPCP administration.
Materials and Methods
The telephone survey results from 2,700 FAPCP participants were analyzed, including demographic, socioeconomic, and disease characteristics and experiences associated with financial burden and the actions or measures to cope with them.
Results
Overall, 87.6% experienced financial burden more than moderate degree, 39.2% got financial help/a loan, 17.8% disposed of their property, and 10.2% changed or stopped treatment owing to medical costs. Monthly household income was connected to financial burden, and the highest income group was associated with the lowest financial burden (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.38) and the lowest rate of changing/stopping care (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.05 to 1.00). Parents of childhood cancer patients got financial help/a loan (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.88) and disposed of their property (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.40 to 7.22) more frequently, and Medical Aids applicants showed the highest rate of changing/stopping care (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.89 to 4.78).
Conclusion
FAPCP targets low income groups; however, financial burden and the consequent actions taken still exist disproportionately, depending on the income of the applicants. FAPCP should focus on more vulnerable groups including Medical Aid applicants and parents of childhood cancer patients, by increasing funds and expanding their support coverage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identifying the factors affecting financial toxicity status in patients with middle and advanced colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study
    Xiaofang He, Jie Chen, Lin Zhang, Qiuping Li, Xiaoli Zhu, Jie Zhao, Ying Chen
    Frontiers in Public Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Individual and joint effect of socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors on cancer in Korea
    Chi Lan Tran, Kui Son Choi, Sun‐Young Kim, Jin‐Kyoung Oh
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(16): 17389.     CrossRef
  • Financial hardship in families of children or adolescents with cancer: a systematic literature review
    Julie Ritter, Savannah Allen, Phillip D Cohen, Andrés Felipe Fajardo, Kelsey Marx, Patrícia Loggetto, Carmen Auste, Hedley Lewis, Karla Emília de Sá Rodrigues, Sharmeen Hussain, Ayomide Omotola, Nancy S Bolous, Harsha Thirumurthy, Beverley M Essue, Eva St
    The Lancet Oncology.2023; 24(9): e364.     CrossRef
  • Trends in medical care utilization in patients with cancer: An analysis of real‐world data in a tertiary hospital in Korea, 2014–2019
    Jung‐Hyun Won, Tae Kyu Chung, Joochul Lee, Sangwon Yoon, Yoomin Jeon, Howard Lee
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(22): 21022.     CrossRef
  • Impact of objective financial burden and subjective financial distress on spiritual well-being and quality of life among working-age cancer survivors
    Danbee Kang, Ka Ryeong Bae, Jihyun Lim, Nayeon Kim, Sungkeun Shim, Sun Seog Kweon, Hwa Jeong Seo, Juhee Cho
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2022; 30(6): 4917.     CrossRef
  • The influence of cross-regional medical treatment on total medical expenses, medical insurance payments, and out-of-pocket expenses of patients with malignant tumors in Chinese low-income areas
    Bokai Zhang, Haixin Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Guomei Tian, Ting Zhang, Qi Shi, Jian Liu, Jinpeng Xu, Jingchu Liu, Qunhong Wu, Zheng Kang
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Financial Toxicity of Cancer Care: An Analysis of Financial Burden in Three Distinct Health Care Systems
    Divya A. Parikh, Meera Ragavan, Ritika Dutta, Jeffrey Garnet Edwards, James Dickerson, Debeshi Maitra, Sangeeta Aggarwal, Fa-Chyi Lee, Manali I. Patel
    JCO Oncology Practice.2021; 17(10): e1450.     CrossRef
  • Burden of Treatment among Elderly Patients with Cancer: A Scoping Review
    Adem Sav, Sara S. McMillan, Adeola Akosile
    Healthcare.2021; 9(5): 612.     CrossRef
  • Symptom experiences and health‐related quality of life among non‐small cell lung cancer patients participating in clinical trials
    Kyunghwa Lee, Eui Geum Oh, Sanghee Kim, Sang‐We Kim
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2019; 28(11-12): 2111.     CrossRef
  • The Incidences and Characteristics of Various Cancers in Patients on Dialysis: a Korean Nationwide Study
    Soon Kil Kwon, Joung-Ho Han, Hye-Young Kim, Gilwon Kang, Minseok Kang, Yeonkook J. Kim, Jinsoo Min
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Higher Age Puts Lung Cancer Patients at Risk for Not Receiving Anti-cancer Treatment
    Won-Il Choi, Jiah Choi, Mi-Ae Kim, Gyumin Lee, Jihyeon Jeong, Choong Won Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(3): 1241.     CrossRef
  • 7,512 View
  • 130 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Close layer
Patient’s Cognitive Function and Attitudes towards Family Involvement in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: A Patient-Family Caregiver Dyadic Analysis
Dong Wook Shin, Juhee Cho, Debra L. Roter, So Young Kim, Jong Hyock Park, Hyung Kook Yang, Hyun Woo Lee, Sun-Seog Kweon, Yune Sik Kang, Keeho Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):681-690.   Published online July 4, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.201
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Older patient populations commonly have cognitive impairment, which might impact decisional capacity. We examined patients and family caregivers preferences for family involvement in treatment decision making assuming different level of cognitive impairment, and sought to explore the factors associated with the preferences and the degree to which patients and family members agree on preferences.
Materials and Methods
A total of 358 elderly cancer patient and caregiver dyads were recruited from the 11 cancer centers in Korea andwere asked to express their preferences forfamily involvement in treatment decision making using hypothetical scenarios with three different levels of cognitive status (intact, mild impairment, and severe impairment).
Results
Both patients and family caregivers preferred greater family dominance in treatment decision makingwith the increasing the level of cognitive impairment (39.7%, 60.9%, and 86.6% for patients and 45.0%, 66.2%, and 89.7% for caregivers in each scenarios). Patient and family caregiver concordance in decisional control preference was small for all three scenarios (weighted κ=0.32, κ=0.26, and κ=0.36, respectively). Higher patient education was associated with preference for patient dominance in treatment decision in conditions of both mild and severe cognitive impairment. The association of higher patient education and patient-caregiver preference concordance was positive with intact cognition, while it was negative with severe cognitive impairment.
Conclusion
Decision control preferences were affected by hypothesized cognitive status of the patients. Findings from our study would be helpful to develop effective strategy for optimizing family involvement in cancer treatment decision in the context of deteriorating cognitive function of the patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comorbid Dementia and Cancer Therapy Decision-Making: A Scoping Review
    Sean N. Halpin, Gabriel Alain, Aaron Seaman, Erin E. Stevens, Hui Zhao, Mackenzie E. Fowler, Qiuyang Zhang, Tamara Cadet, Minzhi Ye, Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
    Journal of Applied Gerontology.2024; 43(8): 1132.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the association between quantity and quality of family caregiver participation in decision-making clinical encounters on patient activation in the metastatic breast cancer setting
    Nicole L. Henderson, Tanvi Padalkar, Garrett Bourne, Emma K. Hendrix, Courtney P. Williams, J. Nicholas Odom, Kristen Triebel, Gabrielle B. Rocque
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fatalism and metaphor in Confucianism: A qualitative study of barriers to genetic testing among first‐degree relatives of hereditary cancer patients from China
    Chaonan Jiang, Li Liu, Ye Wang, Liangzheng Wu, Wenxia Zhang, Xiaodan Wu
    Psycho-Oncology.2023; 32(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Nurse on the Treatment Decision Support for Older People with Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Hiroko Komatsu, Yasuhiro Komatsu
    Healthcare.2023; 11(4): 546.     CrossRef
  • A prospective cohort study of decision‐making role preferences of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers
    Semra Ozdemir, Sean Ng, Isha Chaudhry, Chetna Malhotra, Eric Andrew Finkelstein
    Cancer.2023; 129(9): 1443.     CrossRef
  • Cancer literacy among Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors and informal carers: Qualitative explorations
    Samar J. Melhem, Shereen Nabhani-Gebara, Reem Kayyali
    Frontiers in Public Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preferred and actual involvement of caregivers in oncologic treatment decision-making: A systematic review
    Laura M.L. Tielemans, Kirsten D. van Heugten, Marije E. Hamaker, Inez C. van Walree
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(6): 101525.     CrossRef
  • Factors Affecting Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Treatment of Myeloma and Indolent Lymphoma
    Chia Jie Tan, Melinda Si Yun Tan, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng, Yen-Lin Chee, Melissa Ooi, Lawrence Cheng Kiat Ng, Yunxin Chen, Joanne Su Yin Yoong, Xin Yi Wong, Wei-Ying Jen
    JCO Oncology Practice.2023; 19(12): 1168.     CrossRef
  • The Association Between Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis and Patient Treatment Preferences: a Survey of Older Adults
    Deborah A. Levine, Andrzej T. Galecki, Brenda L. Plassman, Angela Fagerlin, Lauren P. Wallner, Kenneth M. Langa, Rachael T. Whitney, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Lewis B. Morgenstern, Bailey K. Reale, Emilie M. Blair, Bruno Giordani, Kathleen Anne Welsh-Bohme
    Journal of General Internal Medicine.2022; 37(8): 1925.     CrossRef
  • Patient activation and treatment decision-making in the context of cancer: examining the contribution of informal caregivers’ involvement
    Chiara Acquati, Judith H. Hibbard, Ellen Miller-Sonet, Anao Zhang, Elena Ionescu
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2022; 16(5): 929.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer: A scoping review
    Bea L. Dijkman, Marie Louise Luttik, Hanneke Van der Wal-Huisman, Wolter Paans, Barbara L. van Leeuwen
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2022; 13(4): 391.     CrossRef
  • The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol
    Clizia Cincidda, Serena Oliveri, Virginia Sanchini, Gabriella Pravettoni
    Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A qualitative study
    Ni Gong, Qianqian Du, Hongyu Lou, Yiheng Zhang, Hengying Fang, Xueying Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Ya Meng, Meifen Zhang
    Nursing Ethics.2021; 28(2): 242.     CrossRef
  • Family Caregiving Situations and Engagement in Advance Care Planning
    Kyeongmo Kim, Michin Hong, Thomas Buckley
    Journal of Palliative Medicine.2020; 23(1): 125.     CrossRef
  • What We Talk about When We Talk about Caregiving: The Distribution of Roles in Cancer Patient Caregiving in a Family-Oriented Culture
    Ansuk Jeong, Dongwook Shin, Jong Hyock Park, Keeho Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 141.     CrossRef
  • Experience with age discrimination and attitudes toward ageism in older patients with cancer and their caregivers: A nationwide Korean survey
    Dong Wook Shin, Keeho Park, Ansuk Jeong, Hyung Kook Yang, So Young Kim, Mihee Cho, Jong Hyock Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2019; 10(3): 459.     CrossRef
  • How family caregivers of persons with advanced cancer assist with upstream healthcare decision-making: A qualitative study
    J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom, Deborah Ejem, Rachel Wells, Amber E. Barnato, Richard A. Taylor, Gabrielle B. Rocque, Yasemin E. Turkman, Matthew Kenny, Nataliya V. Ivankova, Marie A. Bakitas, Michelle Y. Martin, Mojtaba Vaismoradi
    PLOS ONE.2019; 14(3): e0212967.     CrossRef
  • 10,770 View
  • 233 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Close layer
Terminal Versus Advanced Cancer: Do the General Population and Health Care Professionals Share a Common Language?
Sang Hyuck Kim, Dong Wook Shin, So Young Kim, Hyung Kook Yang, Eunjoo Nam, Hyun Jung Jho, Eunmi Ahn, Be Long Cho, Keeho Park, Jong-Hyock Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):759-767.   Published online August 10, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.124
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Many end-of-life care studies are based on the assumption that there is a shared definition of language concerning the stage of cancer. However, studies suggest that patients and their families often misperceive patients’ cancer stages and prognoses. Discrimination between advanced cancer and terminal cancer is important because the treatment goals are different. In this study, we evaluated the understanding of the definition of advanced versus terminal cancer of the general population and determined associated socio-demographic factors. Materials and Methods A total of 2,000 persons from the general population were systematically recruited. We used a clinical vignette of a hypothetical advanced breast cancer patient, but whose cancer was not considered terminal. After presenting the brief history of the case, we asked respondents to choose the correct cancer stage from a choice of early, advanced, terminal stage, and don’t know. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine sociodemographic factors associated with the correct response, as defined in terms of medical context.
Results
Only 411 respondents (20.6%) chose “advanced,“ while most respondents (74.5%) chose “terminal stage” as the stage of the hypothetical patient, and a small proportion of respondents chose “early stage” (0.7%) or “don’t know” (4.4%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis found no consistent or strong predictor.
Conclusion
A large proportion of the general population could not differentiate advanced cancer from terminal cancer. Continuous effort is required in order to establish common and shared definitions of the different cancer stages and to increase understanding of cancer staging for the general population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A qualitative study on redefining normality in relatives of patients with advanced cancer
    Helen P. A. Driessen, Evi M. Bakker, Judith A. C. Rietjens, Khanh L. N. Luu, Marjolein Lugtenberg, Frederika E. Witkamp, Leonieke W. Kranenburg
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of prognosis in lung cancer using machine learning with inter-institutional generalizability: A multicenter cohort study (WJOG15121L: REAL-WIND)
    Daichi Fujimoto, Hidetoshi Hayashi, Kenta Murotani, Yukihiro Toi, Toshihide Yokoyama, Terufumi Kato, Teppei Yamaguchi, Kaoru Tanaka, Satoru Miura, Motohiro Tamiya, Motoko Tachihara, Takehito Shukuya, Yuko Tsuchiya-Kawano, Yuki Sato, Satoshi Ikeda, Shinya
    Lung Cancer.2024; 194: 107896.     CrossRef
  • Preserving the integrity of personhood in people with advanced cancer: An in-depth qualitative study among patients, relatives, and care professionals
    Alina Senßfelder, Matthias Havemann, Anna J Pedrosa Carrasco, Pia von Blanckenburg, Carola Seifart
    Palliative Medicine.2024; 38(9): 1054.     CrossRef
  • Complementary Musical Intervention for Patients in Palliative Care in Spain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Inmaculada Valero-Cantero, María Ángeles Vázquez-Sánchez, José Luis Casals-Sánchez, Milagrosa Espinar-Toledo, Juan Corral-Pérez, Cristina Casals
    Healthcare.2024; 12(19): 1938.     CrossRef
  • Challenges of Home Parenteral Nutrition for Patients with Advanced Cancer
    Soroor Fathi, Bahareh Aminnejad kavkani, Soheila Shekari, Samaneh Mirzaei Dahka, Naeemeh Hassanpour Ardekanizadeh, Golsa Khalatbari Mohseni, Maryam Gholamalizadeh, Kourosh Delpasand, Nasibe Jafarnia, Fatemeh Mohammadi-Nasrabadi, Saeid Doaei
    International Journal of Cancer Management.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions
    Olena Mandrik, Chloe Thomas, Sophie Whyte, James Chilcott
    PharmacoEconomics.2022; 40(4): 359.     CrossRef
  • End-of-life communication experiences within families of people with advanced cancer in China: A qualitative study
    Tianmeng Xu, Yuan Qin, Xiaohong Ou, Xiaowei Zhao, Pei Wang, Mengmeng Wang, Peng Yue
    International Journal of Nursing Studies.2022; 132: 104261.     CrossRef
  • Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
    Zhong Ning Leonard Goh, Mu-Wei Chen, Hao-Tsai Cheng, Kuang-Hung Hsu, Chen-Ken Seak, Joanna Chen-Yeen Seak, Seng Kit Ling, Shao-Feng Liao, Tzu-Heng Cheng, Yi-Da Sie, Chih-Huang Li, Hsien-Yi Chen, Cheng-Yu Chien, Chen-June Seak
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(6): 954.     CrossRef
  • Challenges in self‐management of persons living with advanced cancer: An exploratory, in‐depth interview study
    Hanna Noorlandt, Rik Stoevelaar, Sophie van Dongen, Muzeyyen Arslan, Nancy Luu, Leonieke Kranenburg, Erica Witkamp, Carin van der Rijt, Kate Lorig, Agnes van der Heide, Judith Rietjens
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A qualitative meta-synthesis examining spirituality as experienced by individuals living with terminal cancer
    Lucy Hayden, Emma Byrne, Avril Deegan, Simon Dunne, Pamela Gallagher
    Health Psychology Open.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Francis J. O’Hanlon, Konstantinos C. Fragkos, Lucia Fini, Pinal S. Patel, Shameer J. Mehta, Farooq Rahman, Simona Di Caro
    Nutrition and Cancer.2021; 73(6): 943.     CrossRef
  • Strategies for living well with hormone-responsive advanced prostate cancer—a qualitative exploration
    Lauren Matheson, Jo Nayoan, Carol Rivas, Jo Brett, Penny Wright, Hugh Butcher, Paul Jordan, Anna Gavin, Adam Glaser, Malcolm Mason, Richard Wagland, Eila Watson
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2021; 29(3): 1317.     CrossRef
  • Cancer treatment resumption in patients with new-generation drug-eluting stents
    Dinu Valentin Balanescu, Moez Karim Aziz, Teodora Donisan, Nicolas Palaskas, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Saamir Hassan, Peter Kim, Juhee Song, William Ntim, Mehmet Cilingiroglu, Konstantinos Marmagkiolis, Cezar Iliescu
    Coronary Artery Disease.2021; 32(4): 295.     CrossRef
  • Physical Activity for Individuals Living with Advanced Cancer: Evidence and Recommendations
    Lauren C. Capozzi, Julia T. Daun, Manuel Ester, Stephen Mosca, David Langelier, George J. Francis, Eugene Chang, Daniel Santa Mina, Jack B. Fu, S. Nicole Culos-Reed
    Seminars in Oncology Nursing.2021; 37(4): 151170.     CrossRef
  • Shock Index: A Simple and Effective Clinical Adjunct in Predicting 60-Day Mortality in Advanced Cancer Patients at the Emergency Department
    Tzu-Heng Cheng, Yi-Da Sie, Kuang-Hung Hsu, Zhong Ning Leonard Goh, Cheng-Yu Chien, Hsien-Yi Chen, Chip-Jin Ng, Chih-Huang Li, Joanna Chen-Yeen Seak, Chen-Ken Seak, Yi-Tung Liu, Chen-June Seak
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(13): 4904.     CrossRef
  • Impact of prognostic nutritional index on terminal cancer patients
    AmrallahA Mohammed, Omar Al-Zahrani, FifiMostafa Elsayed
    Indian Journal of Palliative Care.2020; 26(4): 433.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic Breast Cancer as a Chronic Condition
    Patti Rager Zuzelo
    Holistic Nursing Practice.2019; 33(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Experiences and Opinions Related to End-of-Life Discussion: From Oncologists' and Resident Physicians' Perspectives
    Su-Jin Koh, Shinmi Kim, JinShil Kim, Bhumsuk Keam, Dae Seog Heo, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong-Seog Kim, Jee Hyun Kim, Hye Jung Chang, Sun Kyung Baek
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(2): 614.     CrossRef
  • End-of-life chemotherapy is associated with poor survival and aggressive care in patients with small cell lung cancer
    Yingming Zhu, Ke Tang, Fen Zhao, Yuanwei Zang, Xiaodong Wang, Zhenxiang Li, Xindong Sun, Jinming Yu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2018; 144(8): 1591.     CrossRef
  • Consensus guidelines for the definition of the end stage of disease and last days of life and criteria for medical judgment
    Sang-Min Lee, Su-Jung Kim, Youn Seon Choi, Dae Seog Heo, Sujin Baik, Bo Moon Choi, Daekyun Kim, Jae Young Moon, So Young Park, Yoon Jung Chang, In Cheol Hwang, Jung Hye Kwon, Sun-Hyun Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Jeanno Park, Ho Jung Ahn, Hyun Woo Lee, Ivo Kwon, Do-
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2018; 61(8): 509.     CrossRef
  • A research study review of effectiveness of treatments for psychiatric conditions common to end-stage cancer patients: needs assessment for future research and an impassioned plea
    Ralph J. Johnson
    BMC Psychiatry.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comment on “Asian collaboration to establish a provisional system to provide high‐quality end‐of‐life care by promoting advance care planning for the elderly”
    Dong Wook Shin, Ji Eun Lee, BeLong Cho, Sang Ho Yoo, SangYun Kim, Jun‐Hyun Yoo
    Geriatrics & Gerontology International.2017; 17(4): 672.     CrossRef
  • 12,976 View
  • 102 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 22 Crossref
Close layer
Public Perceptions on Cancer Incidence and Survival: A Nation-wide Survey in Korea
Soyeun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyung Kook Yang, So Young Kim, Young-Jin Ko, BeLong Cho, Young Sung Lee, Dukhyoung Lee, Keeho Park, Jong Hyock Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):775-788.   Published online May 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.369
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aim of this study was to compare the public perceptions of the incidence rates and survival rates for common cancers with the actual rates from epidemiologic data.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a survey of Korean adults without history of cancer (n=2,000). The survey consisted of questions about their perceptions regarding lifetime incidence rates and 5-year survival rates for total cancer, as well as those of eight site-specific cancers. To investigate associated factors, we included questions about cancer worry (Lerman’s Cancer Worry Scale) or cared for a family member or friend with cancer as a caregiver.
Results
Only 19% of Korean adults had an accurate perception of incidence rates compared with the epidemiologic data on total cancer. For specific cancers, most of the respondents overestimated the incidence rates and 10%-30% of men and 6%-18% of women had an accurate perception. A high score in “cancer worry” was associated with higher estimates of incidence rates in total and specific cancers. In cancers with high actual 5-year survival rates (e.g., breast and thyroid), the majority of respondents underestimated survival rates. However, about 50% of respondents overestimated survival rates in cancers with low actual survival rates (e.g., lung and liver). There was no factor consistently associated with perceived survival rates.
Conclusion
Widespread discrepancies were observed between perceived probability and actual epidemiological data. In order to reduce cancer worry and to increase health literacy, communication and patient education on appropriate risk is needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The correlation between individuals’ attitudes toward cancer screening, cancer information overload, and healthy life awareness: a cross-sectional study
    Melike Demir Doğan, Seda Kurt, Berkay Ertin
    Journal of Public Health.2024; 32(5): 759.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Fear of Thyroid Cancer in the General U.S. Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Stephanie R. Taylor, Alexander Chiu, Ines Hoxha, Megan C. Saucke, Catherine B. Jensen, Susan C. Pitt
    Thyroid®.2024; 34(2): 234.     CrossRef
  • Chasm between Public Perceptions and Epidemiological Data on Colorectal Cancer
    Su Bee Park, Min Seob Kwak, Jin Young Yoon, Jae Myung Cha
    Gut and Liver.2023; 17(3): 449.     CrossRef
  • A Web-Based Decision Aid for Informed Prostate Cancer Screening: Development and Pilot Evaluation
    Wonyoung Jung, In Young Cho, Keun Hye Jeon, Yohwan Yeo, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Ansuk Jeong, Jungkwon Lee, Dong Wook Shin
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Barriers and Challenges to Cervical Cancer Screening, Follow.Up, and Prevention Measures among Korean Immigrant Women in Hawaii
    Eurina Y Cha, Hans Chun
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2021; 8(2): 132.     CrossRef
  • Health-Related Quality of Life, Perceived Social Support, and Depression in Disease-Free Survivors Who Underwent Curative Surgery Only for Prostate, Kidney and Bladder Cancer: Comparison among Survivors and with the General Population
    Dong Wook Shin, Hyun Sik Park, Sang Hyub Lee, Seung Hyun Jeon, Seok Cho, Seok Ho Kang, Seung Chol Park, Jong Hyock Park, Jinsung Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(1): 289.     CrossRef
  • Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
    Dong Wook Shin, Sang Hyub Lee, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seok Joong Yun, Jong Kil Nam, Seung Hyun Jeon, Seung Chol Park, Seung Il Jung, Jong-Hyock Park, Jinsung Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(2): 556.     CrossRef
  • A phase II study of oxaliplatin and prednisone for patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma trial
    Sung Yong Oh, Won Seog Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Yee Soo Chae, Gyeong-Won Lee, Hyeon Seok Eom, Hun Mo Ryoo, Suee Lee, Seok Jin Kim, Dok Hyun Yoon, Jong Ho Won, Junshik Hong, Jinny Park, Sang-Min Lee, Jung Yong Hong, Eunkyung Park, Hyo Jung Kim, Deok-Hwan Yang, H
    Leukemia & Lymphoma.2016; 57(6): 1406.     CrossRef
  • News Portrayal of Cancer: Content Analysis of Threat and Efficacy by Cancer Type and Comparison with Incidence and Mortality in Korea
    Minsun Shim, Yong-Chan Kim, Su Yeon Kye, Keeho Park
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2016; 31(8): 1231.     CrossRef
  • The Workplace Experiences of Breast Cancer Survivors: A Survey of an Online Community
    Ka Ryeong Bae, Sun Young Kwon
    Asian Oncology Nursing.2016; 16(4): 208.     CrossRef
  • 12,892 View
  • 130 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 10 Crossref
Close layer
Perceptions of Cancer Risk and Cause of Cancer Risk in Korean Adults
Su Yeon Kye, Eun Young Park, Kyounghee Oh, Keeho Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(2):158-165.   Published online September 15, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.024
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
The aims of the present study were to assess the prevalence of perceived risk for cancer; to explore associations between sociodemographics and family history of cancer and perceived cancer risk; to identify perceived cause of cancer risk; and to examine the associations between sociodemographics and family history of cancer and perceived cause of cancer risk. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,009 participants aged 30-69 years, selected from a population-based database in October 2009 through multiple-stratified random sampling. Information was collected about the participants’ perceived cancer risk and perceived cause of cancer risk. Results Overall, 59.5% of the respondents thought they had the chance of developing cancer. Female sex, younger age, lower income, and family history of cancer were positively associated with perceived cancer risk. The most important perceived cause of cancer risk was stress. There was a difference between sociodemographics and family history of cancer and perceived cause of cancer risk. Conclusion Factors affecting perceptions of cancer risk and cause of cancer risk need to be addressed in risk communications. The results provide important directions for the development of educational strategies to promote awareness and self-appraisal of cancer risk and risk factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Beliefs on Causes of Cancer in the General Population, and the Association With Risk Perception and Lifestyle in a Multiethnic Setting
    Nur-Nadiatul-Asyikin Bujang, Yek-Ching Kong, Mahmoud Danaee, Murallitharan Munisamy, Ranjit Kaur, Harenthri Devy Alagir Rajah, Hariharan Menon, Shridevi Subramaniam, Kelly Lai Ming Ying, Ros Suzanna Bustamam, Cheng-Har Yip, Nirmala Bhoo Pathy
    JCO Global Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relationship between mental health disorder symptoms and negative cancer perceptions among U.S. adults
    Pierre Fwelo, David Adzrago, Ayooluwatomiwa D. Adekunle, Toluwani E. Adekunle, Ambrose Akinlo, William B. Perkinson
    Cancer Causes & Control.2023; 34(4): 295.     CrossRef
  • Risk Evaluation of Bone Metastases and a Simple Tool for Detecting Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer: A Population‐Based Study
    Shi Li, Caixia Chen, Hua Zhu, Qi Lin, Zhixian Yu, Sathishkumar V E
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk perception of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review on its assessment and associated factors
    Miaw Yn Jane Ling, Norfazilah Ahmad, Azimatun Noor Aizuddin, Ghobad Moradi
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(6): e0286518.     CrossRef
  • Current and Future Perspectives of PD-1/PDL-1 Blockade in Cancer Immunotherapy
    Rangarirai Makuku, Neda Khalili, Sepideh Razi, Mahsa Keshavarz-Fathi, Nima Rezaei, Paola Nistico
    Journal of Immunology Research.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Health Behaviors and Family History of Cancer According to Sex in the General Population
    Minji Hwang, Hyun-Soo Zhang, Boyoung Park
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2019; 56(3): 393.     CrossRef
  • First-degree relatives of cancer patients: a target group for primary prevention? A cross-sectional study
    Ulrike Haug, Oliver Riedel, Constanze Cholmakow-Bodechtel, Louise Olsson
    British Journal of Cancer.2018; 118(9): 1255.     CrossRef
  • Cancer, Stress, and Ironies of Cancer Understanding in South Korea
    Laura C. Nelson
    Medical Anthropology.2017; 36(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Association Assessment among Risk Factors and Breast Cancer in a Low Income Country: Bangladesh
    Kawsar Ahmed, Sayed Asaduzzaman, Mamun Ibn Bashar, Goljar Hossain, Touhid Bhuiyan
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(17): 7507.     CrossRef
  • 11,843 View
  • 100 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP