Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Joung-Soon Jang"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Chemotherapy versus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Jun Ho Ji, Young Saing Kim, Inkeun Park, Soon Il Lee, Rock Bum Kim, Joon Oh Park, Sung Yong Oh, In Gyu Hwang, Joung-Soon Jang, Haa-Na Song, Jung-Hun Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):791-800.   Published online August 23, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.044
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose
Although chemotherapy is recommended by various guidelines for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the evidence supporting its use over best supportive care (BSC) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival benefit of chemotherapy over that of BSC in advanced BTC patients.
Materials and Methods
Advanced BTC patientswith a good performance status (Eastern CooperativeOncologyGroup [ECOG] 0-2) were eligible for the study. Data were retrospectively collected from four tertiary cancer centers and analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 604 patients enrolled, 206 received BSC and 398 received chemotherapy. PSM analysis was performed using the following variables: age, ECOG status, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, white blood cell level, albumin level, total bilirubin level, and aspartate aminotransferase level. The sample size of each group was 164 patients after PSM. Median survival was compared between the two groups by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were investigated using Cox proportional regression analysis.
Results
In post-PSM analysis, the respective median survival for the chemotherapy and BSC groups was dependent on the following prognostic factors: total population, 12.0 months vs. 7.5 months (p=0.001); locally advanced disease, 16.7 months vs. 13.4 months (p=0.490); cancer antigen 19-9 ≤ 100 IU/mL, 12.7 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.330); and CEA ≤ 3.4 ng/mL, 17.1 months vs. 10.6 months (p=0.052).
Conclusion
Chemotherapy improved overall survival of patients with advanced BTC who had a good performance status. However, this survival benefit was not observed in BTC patients with locally advanced disease or with lower tumor marker. Individualized approach is needed for initiation of palliative chemotherapy in advanced BTC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Observational Study of Best Supportive Care With or Without Oral Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma at a Tertiary Center in India
    Abhinav Srivastava, Shagun Misra, Neeraj Rastogi, Vishwas Kapoor, Shaleen Kumar
    JCO Global Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Faisal Saud Dar, Zaigham Abbas, Irfan Ahmed, Muhammad Atique, Usman Iqbal Aujla, Muhammad Azeemuddin, Zeba Aziz, Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti, Tariq Ali Bangash, Amna Subhan Butt, Osama Tariq Butt, Abdul Wahab Dogar, Javed Iqbal Farooqi, Faisal Hanif, Jahanzai
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(9): 1018.     CrossRef
  • Treatment patterns and survival in older adults with unresected nonmetastatic biliary tract cancers
    Ali Belkouz, Elise de Savornin Lohman, Jyothi R. Thumma, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Philip R. de Reuver, Martijn G.H. van Oijen, Cornelis J.A. Punt, Hari Nathan, Heinz-Josef Klümpen
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(3): 101447.     CrossRef
  • Main causes of death in advanced biliary tract cancer
    Kana Kimura‐Seto, Yasushi Kojima, Shiori Komori, Yuya Hisada, Yuki Otake, Yuka Yanai, Akiko Saito, Naoki Akazawa, Yasuo Tanaka, Chizu Yokoi, Mikio Yanase, Junichi Akiyama, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Kazuhiko Yamada
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(9): 10889.     CrossRef
  • A Systematised Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
    Vivian Peirce, Michael Paskow, Lei Qin, Ruby Dadzie, Maria Rapoport, Samantha Prince, Sukhvinder Johal
    Targeted Oncology.2023; 18(6): 837.     CrossRef
  • Short- and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer in the United States From 2000 to 2018
    Van Nghiem, Sarah Wood, Rekha Ramachandran, Grant Williams, Darryl Outlaw, Ravikumar Paluri, Young-il Kim, Olumide Gbolahan
    Cancer Control.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anticancer Drugs Compared to No Anticancer Drugs in Patients with Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancer: A Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map
    Carolina Requeijo, Javier Bracchiglione, Nicolás Meza, Roberto Acosta-Dighero, Josefina Salazar, Marilina Santero, Adriana-G Meade, María Jesús Quintana, Gerardo Rodríguez-Grijalva, Anna Selva, Ivan Solà, Gerard Urrútia, Xavier Bonfill Cosp
    Clinical Epidemiology.2023; Volume 15: 1069.     CrossRef
  • 8,227 View
  • 213 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Close layer
Outcomes of Third-Line Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer Who Failed Previous Oxaliplatin-Based and Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapies
Min Jeong Lee, In Gyu Hwang, Joung-Soon Jang, Jin Hwa Choi, Byeong-Bae Park, Myung Hee Chang, Seung Tae Kim, Se Hoon Park, Myoung Hee Kang, Jung Hun Kang
Cancer Res Treat. 2012;44(4):235-241.   Published online December 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2012.44.4.235
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
PURPOSE
Little is known about outcomes in the use of third-line chemotherapy in cases of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The primary aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate outcomes of docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with AGC that progressed after both oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based regimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eligible patients were those with AGC who had previous chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin as well as fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan and who received subsequent docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients were retrospectively recruited from 5 medical centers in Korea. Patients received either weekly or 3 weekly with docetaxel +/- cisplatin.
RESULTS
Thirty-one out of 35 patients were evaluated for treatment response. A total of 94 cycles of chemotherapy (median, 2; range, 1 to 7) were administered. The overall response rate was 14.3%, and the disease control rate was 45.7%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.7 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.4 months). PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in patients of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, with performance status of 0 or 1 in multivariate analysis (PFS: hazard ratio[HR], 0.411; 95% CI, 0.195 to 0.868; p=0.020 and OS: HR, 0.390; 95% CI, 0.184 to 0.826; p=0.014, respectively). Four of the 35 patients enrolled in the study died due to infection associated with neutropenia.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that salvage docetaxel-based chemotherapy is a feasible treatment option for AGC patients with good performance status (PS), whereas chemotherapy for patients with poor PS (PS< or =2) should be undertaken with caution for those who previously failed oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based regimens.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)
    In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Wonyoung Choi, An Na Seo, Bang Wool Eom, Beodeul Kang, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chung Hyun Tae, Chang In Choi, Choong-kun Lee, Ho Jung An, Hwa Kyung Byun, Hyeon-Su Im, Hyung-Don Kim, Jang Ho Cho, Kyoungjune Pak, Jae-Joon Kim
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2025; 25(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of novel prognostic biomarkers to predict pathological complete response in patients with non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using a window of opportunity design
    Chitradurga Rajashekhar Akshatha, Dhanapathi Halanaik, Rajesh Nachiappa Ganesh, Nanda Kishore, Prasanth Ganesan, Smita Kayal, Harichandra Kumar, Biswajit Dubashi
    Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • HTA and Gastric Cancer: Evaluating Alternatives in Third- and Fourth-Line Patients
    Lucrezia Ferrario, Federica Asperti, Giuseppe Aprile, Jacopo Giuliani
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(3): 2107.     CrossRef
  • Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach
    Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Miyoung Choi, Baek-Hui Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Bum Jun Kim, Byung-Hoon Min, Chang In Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Chung Hyun Tae, Chung sik Gong, Dong Jin Kim, Arthur Eung-Hyuck Cho, Eun Jeong Gong, Geum Jong Song, Hyeon-Su Im
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Global Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines
    Sang Soo Eom, Wonyoung Choi, Bang Wool Eom, Sin Hye Park, Soo Jin Kim, Young Il Kim, Hong Man Yoon, Jong Yeul Lee, Chan Gyoo Kim, Hark Kyun Kim, Myeong-Cherl Kook, Il Ju Choi, Young-Woo Kim, Young Iee Park, Keun Won Ryu
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2022; 22(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Current therapeutic options for gastric adenocarcinoma
    C.R. Akshatha, Smitha Bhat, R. Sindhu, Dharini Shashank, Sarana Rose Sommano, Wanaporn Tapingkae, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Shashanka K. Prasad
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021; 28(9): 5371.     CrossRef
  • What is the value of third‐line chemotherapy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer? A 5‐year retrospective analysis at a single center
    Justina Yick Ching Lam, Su Pin Choo, David Wai‐Meng Tai, Iain Bee Huat Tan, Chee Kian Tham, Wen Hsin Koo, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Soo Fan Ang, Clarinda Wei Ling Chua, Dawn Qingqing Chong, Patrick Tze Hern Teo, Christabel Jing Zhi Lee, Samuel Cheng En Ee, Mat
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 16(1): 23.     CrossRef
  • Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an Evidence-based, Multi-disciplinary Approach

    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2019; 19(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Novel Agents in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Gastric Cancer: More Shadows Than Lights
    Giandomenico Roviello, Alberto D’Angelo, Raheleh Roudi, Roberto Petrioli, Enrico Mini
    Journal of Oncology.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving third-line chemotherapy: A population-based outcomes study
    In Sil Choi, Mihong Choi, Ju Hyun Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Koung Jin Suh, Ji Yun Lee, Beodeul Kang, Ji-Won Kim, Se-Hyun Kim, Jin Won Kim, Jeong-Ok Lee, Yu Jung Kim, Soo-Mee Bang, Jong Seok Lee, Keun-Wook Lee, Ju-Seog Lee
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(6): e0198544.     CrossRef
  • The role of third-line chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer
    Yong Won Choi, Mi Sun Ahn, Geum Sook Jeong, Hyun Woo Lee, Seong Hyun Jeong, Seok Yun Kang, Joon Seong Park, Jin-Hyuk Choi, Seung Soo Sheen
    Medicine.2018; 97(39): e12588.     CrossRef
  • Third line treatment of advanced oesophagogastric cancer: A critical review of current evidence and evolving trends
    P. Edwards, M. Davidson, V. Calamai, D. Cunningham, N. Starling
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2018; 71: 32.     CrossRef
  • Irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, and taxanes
    Takashi Nishimura, Satoru Iwasa, Kengo Nagashima, Natsuko Okita, Atsuo Takashima, Yoshitaka Honma, Ken Kato, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Yasuhide Yamada, Yasuhiro Shimada, Narikazu Boku
    Gastric Cancer.2017; 20(4): 655.     CrossRef
  • Advanced gastric cancer: is there an optimal chemotherapy regimen?
    Kalliopi Andrikou, Massimiliano Salati, Annalisa Fontana, Andrea Spallanzani, Stefania Pipitone, Fabio Gelsomino, Monica Barbolini, Stefano Cascinu
    Expert Review of Quality of Life in Cancer Care.2017; 2(2): 123.     CrossRef
  • Third-line systemic treatment versus best supportive care for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wing-lok Chan, Kwok-keung Yuen, Steven Wai-kwan Siu, Ka-on Lam, Dora Lai-wan Kwong
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2017; 116: 68.     CrossRef
  • Third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer
    Yu Zheng, Xu-Qing Zhu, Xiao-Gang Ren
    Medicine.2017; 96(24): e6884.     CrossRef
  • Second-line treatments: moving towards an opportunity to improve survival in advanced gastric cancer?
    Massimiliano Salati, Katia Di Emidio, Vittoria Tarantino, Stefano Cascinu
    ESMO Open.2017; 2(3): e000206.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with at Least Three Lines of Systemic Chemotherapy
    Valentina Fanotto, Mario Uccello, Irene Pecora, Lorenza Rimassa, Francesco Leone, Gerardo Rosati, Daniele Santini, Riccardo Giampieri, Samantha Di Donato, Gianluca Tomasello, Nicola Silvestris, Filippo Pietrantonio, Francesca Battaglin, Antonio Avallone,
    The Oncologist.2017; 22(12): 1463.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic gastric cancer treatment: Second line and beyond
    Marwan Ghosn, Samer Tabchi, Hampig Raphael Kourie, Mustapha Tehfe
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(11): 3069.     CrossRef
  • A Phase I study of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer who have failed prior chemotherapy (GASTANA)
    Yoon-Koo Kang, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Shinkyo Yoon, Lin Shen, Jooyun Lee, Chenlu Wei, Yu Zhou, Min-Hee Ryu
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2015; 75(2): 309.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the availability of active cytotoxic agents on the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer
    BYUNG HA CHO, HYE SOOK HAN, JIHYUN KWON, JOUNG-HO HAN, SOON MAN YOON, DAE HOON KIM, HYO YUNG YUN, KI HYEONG LEE, SEI JIN YOUN, SEUNG TAIK KIM
    Oncology Letters.2015; 10(4): 2481.     CrossRef
  • Docetaxel and its potential in the treatment of refractory esophagogastric adenocarcinoma
    Hugo Ford, Ioannis Gounaris
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2015; 8(4): 189.     CrossRef
  • Chemotherapy beyond second-line in advanced gastric cancer
    Sung Min Kim
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(29): 8811.     CrossRef
  • Biweekly S-1 plus paclitaxel (SPA) as second-line chemotherapy after failure from fluoropyrimidine and platinum in advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study
    Yulong Zheng, Weijia Fang, Chenyu Mao, Joing Qian, Peng Zhao, Xiaochen Zhang, Haiping Jiang, Yi Zheng, Nong Xu
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2014; 74(3): 503.     CrossRef
  • 62,474 View
  • 93 Download
  • 24 Crossref
Close layer
A Phase II Study of Leucovorin, 5-FU and Docetaxel Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Inoperable or Postoperative Relapsed Gastric Cancer
Kwang-Sun Lee, Ha-Yeon Lee, Eun-Kyung Park, Joung-Soon Jang, Sang-Jae Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40(1):11-15.   Published online March 31, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2008.40.1.11
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

To estimate the effect and toxicity of bimonthly low-dose leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus plus continuous infusion(LV5FU2) with docetaxel combination chemotheraphy in patients with inoperable or postoperative relapsed gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

Total 27 patients are enrolled in this study. LV 20 mg/m2 (bolus), 5FU 400 mg/m2 (bolus), 5-FU 600 mg/m2 (24-hour continuous infusion) on day 1, 2, 15, and 16, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion) on day 15 every 4 weeks.

Results

Total of 141 cycles were administered and response rate were 36.8% with 2 complete response (10.5%) and 5 partial response (26.3%) in 19 evaluable patients. The median response duration is 8.1 months (95% CI, 4.0~12.1). The median progression-free survival time is 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.0~8.5) and the median overall survival time is 11.9 months (95% CI, 4.8~19.1). The grade 3-4 toxcity of neutropenia (24.8%) and anemia (11.3%), neutropenic fever (2.8%) is observed. The grade 1 toxcity of injection site reaction is observed all patients and the grade 1-2 toxcity of alopecia is observed 60%.

Conclusions

LV5FU2 with docetaxel combination chemotheraphy is effective and tolerable in patients with inoperable or postoperative relapsed gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial
    Jian-Xian Lin, Yi-Hui Tang, Hua-Long Zheng, Kai Ye, Jian-Chun Cai, Li-Sheng Cai, Wei Lin, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jun Lu, Qi-Yue Chen, Long-Long Cao, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Chang-Ming Huang
    Nature Communications.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts
    P C Thuss-Patience, A Kretzschmar, Y Dogan, F Rothmann, I Blau, I Schwaner, K Breithaupt, D Bichev, M Grothoff, C Grieser, P Reichardt
    British Journal of Cancer.2011; 105(4): 505.     CrossRef
  • 9,099 View
  • 60 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
A Phase II Trial of Docetaxel and Ifosfamide for Patients with Platinum-Resistant or Refractory Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Salvage Setting
Gyeong-Won Lee, Jung-Hun Kang, Seok-Hyun Kim, Hea Yong Lee, Ho-Cheol Kim, Won-Sup Lee, Jong-Duk Lee, Young-Sil Hwang, Joung-Soon Jang, Jong-Seok Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36(5):287-292.   Published online October 31, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.5.287
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Purpose

We conducted a phase II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide chemotherapy for patients with platinum-resistant or refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate the response and toxicity profiles as a salvage treatment.

Materials and Methods

Between July 2000 and July 2004, 40 patients who had previously received platinum-based regimen as the first-line or second-line therapy were enrolled in this study. The treatment consisted of a docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on day 1 and intravenous ifosfamide 3 g/m2 with Mesna® uroprotectione on day 1 through 3. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

Results

One hundred thirty cycles of treatment were given, with a median of 3 cycles (range: 2~6 cycles). All the patients were evaluable for the response rate and toxicity profile. The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3~4 neutropenia occurred in 30 patients (75%) during treatment. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (40%). Five of 40 patients (12.5%) had a partial response (95% confidence interval, 3.3~21.7%). The median time to disease progression was 2.65 months (range: 2.02~3.20 months), and the median survival was 5.24 months (range: 2.99~7.49 months).

Conclusion

Salvage chemotherapy with docetaxel and ifosfamide showed a low efficacy and a high proportion of severe neutropenia in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory advanced NSCLC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Safety and Efficacy of Second-line Single Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients who were Previously Treated with Platinum-based Chemotherapy
    Byoung Yong Shim, Chi Hong Kim, So Hyang Song, Meyung Im Ahn, Eun Jung Hong, Sung Whan Kim, Suzy Kim, Min Seop Jo, Deog Gon Cho, Kyu Do Cho, Jinyoung Yoo, Hoon-Kyo Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2005; 37(6): 339.     CrossRef
  • 9,503 View
  • 52 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

Cancer Res Treat : Cancer Research and Treatment
Close layer
TOP