Cancer Research and Treatment

Original Articles

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Development and Validation of a Symptom-Focused Quality of Life Questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) for Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy: Bang Wool Eom, Joongyub Lee, In Seob Lee, Young-Gil Son, Keun Won Ryu, Sung Geun Kim, Hyoung-Il Kim, Young-Woo Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Ji-Ho Park, Ji Yeong An, Chang Hyun Kim, Byoung-Jo Suh, Hong Man Yoon, Myoung Won Son, Ji Yeon Park, Jong-Min Park, Sang-Ho Jeong, Moon-Won Yoo, Geum Jong Song, Han-Kwang Yang, Yun-Suhk Suh, Ki Bum Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Dong Woo Shin, Ye Seob Jee, Hye-Seong Ahn, Sol Lee, Jae Seok Min, Haejin In, Ahyoung Kim, Hoon Hur, Hyuk-Joon Lee, on behalf of KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS); Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(3):763-772. Published online December 29, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.1270

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
Patients who have undergone gastrectomy have unique symptoms that are not appropriately assessed using currently available tools. This study developed and validated a symptom-focused quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for patients who have received gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods Based on a literature review, patient interviews, and expert consultation by the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS), the initial item pool was developed. Two large-scale developmental studies were then sequentially conducted for exploratory factor analyses for content validity and item reduction. The final item pool was validated in a separate cohort of patients and assessed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and clinical validity.
Results
The initial questionnaire consisted of 46-items in 12 domains. Data from 465 patients at 11 institutions, followed by 499 patients at 13 institutions, were used to conduct item reduction and exploratory factor analyses. The final questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) comprised 40 items within 11 domains. Validation of KOQUSS-40 was conducted on 413 patients from 12 hospitals. KOQUSS-40 was found to have good model fit. The mean summary score of the KOQUSS-40 was correlated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22 (correlation coefficients, 0.821 and 0.778, respectively). The KOQUSS-40 score was also correlated with clinical factors, and had acceptable internal consistency (> 0.7). Test-retest reliability was greater than 0.8. Conclusion The KOQUSS-40 can be used to assess QoL of gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy and allows for a robust comparison of surgical techniques in clinical trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Global status of research on gastrointestinal cancer patients’ quality of life: A bibliometric and visual analysis from 2003 to 2023
Xiaoqin Wang, Caihua Wang, Wenjin Han, Jiaru Sun, Zhaozhao Hui, Shuangyan Lei, Huili Wu, Xiaohong Liu
Heliyon.2024; 10(1): e23377. CrossRef
Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy
Ji-Hyeon Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee, JeeSun Kim, Yo-Seok Cho, Sunjoo Lee, Seongmin Park, Hwinyeong Choe, Eunhwa Song, Youngran Kim, Seong-Ho Kong, Do Joong Park, Byung-Ho Nam, Han-Kwang Yang
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2024; 24(4): 420. CrossRef
Effect of Four Main Gastrectomy Procedures for Proximal Gastric Cancer on Patient Quality of Life: A Nationwide Multi-Institutional Study
Koji Nakada, Akitoshi Kimura, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Nobue Futawatari, Kazunari Misawa, Kuniaki Aridome, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Kazuaki Tanabe, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Atsushi Oshio, Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(2): 275. CrossRef
Quality of life after gastric cancer surgery
Jae Kyun Park, Hyuk-Joon Lee
Foregut Surgery.2023; 3(2): 27. CrossRef
Long-term Functional and Patient-reported Outcomes Between Intra-corporeal Delta-shaped Gastroduodenostomy and Gastrojejunostomy After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy
Sin Hye Park, Hong Man Yoon, Keun Won Ryu, Young-Woo Kim, Mira Han, Bang Wool Eom
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2023; 23(4): 561. CrossRef
Potential Applicability of Local Resection With Prophylactic Left Gastric Artery Basin Dissection for Early-Stage Gastric Cancer in the Upper Third of the Stomach
Yoshimasa Akashi, Koichi Ogawa, Katsuji Hisakura, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Yusuke Ohara, Yohei Owada, Shinji Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Osamu Shimomura, Manami Doi, Yoshihiro Miyazaki, Kinji Furuya, Shoko Moue, Tatsuya Oda
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2022; 22(3): 184. CrossRef
Systematic review of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues associated with gastric cancer: capturing cross-cultural differences
Alison Rowsell, Samantha C. Sodergren, Vassilios Vassiliou, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Marianne G. Guren, Bilal Alkhaffaf, Chantelle Moorbey, Kristopher Dennis, Mitsumi Terada
Gastric Cancer.2022; 25(4): 665. CrossRef
Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms following surgery for gastric cancer and the relative risk factors
Rui Xu, Qiong Gu, Shuomeng Xiao, Ping Zhao, Zhi Ding
Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing survival rates, quality of life and nutritional status between advanced gastric cancer patients with different follow-up intensities: study protocol for the STOFOLUP trial
Bang Wool Eom, Dong-Hoe Koo, Ji Yeong An, Han Hong Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Hoon Hur, Moon-Won Yoo, Min-Hee Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Su Mi Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Jae Seok Min, Kyung Won Seo, Sang-Ho Jeong, Oh Jeong, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Seung Wan Ryu, Chang Hak Yoo, Jae Moon
BMJ Open.2021; 11(12): e056187. CrossRef

8,954 View
334 Download
8 Web of Science
9 Crossref

Gastrointestinal cancer

A Multi-cohort Study of the Prognostic Significance of Microsatellite Instability or Mismatch Repair Status after Recurrence of Resectable Gastric Cancer: Ji Yeong An, Yoon Young Choi, Jeeyun Lee, Woo Jin Hyung, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Sung Hoon Noh, Min-Gew Choi, Jae-Ho Cheong; Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):1153-1161. Published online May 4, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.173

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
High microsatellite instability (MSI) is related to good prognosis in gastric cancer. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors of patients with recurrent gastric cancer and investigate the role of MSI as a prognostic and predictive biomarker of survival after tumor recurrence.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients treated for stage II/III gastric cancer who developed tumor recurrence and in whom the MSI status or mismatch repair (MMR) status of the tumor was known. MSI status and the expression of MMR proteins were evaluated using polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analysis, respectively.
Results
Of the 790 patients included, 64 (8.1%) had high MSI status or MMR deficiency. The tumor-node-metastasis stage, type of recurrence, Lauren classification, chemotherapy after recurrence, and interval to recurrence were independently associated with survival after tumor recurrence. The MSI/MMR status and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with survival after recurrence. In a subgroup analysis of patients with high MSI or MMR-deficient gastric cancer, those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had better treatment response to chemotherapy after recurrence than those who received adjuvant chemotherapy.
Conclusion
Patients with high MSI/MMR-deficient gastric cancer should be spared from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, but aggressive chemotherapy after recurrence should be considered. Higher tumor-node-metastasis stage, Lauren classification, interval to recurrence, and type of recurrence are associated with survival after tumor recurrence and should thus be considered when establishing a treatment plan and designing clinical trials targeting recurrent gastric cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

HIGD1B, as a novel prognostic biomarker, is involved in regulating the tumor microenvironment and immune cell infiltration; its overexpression leads to poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients
Shibo Wang, Siyi Zhang, Xiaoxuan Li, Xiangxue Li, Shufen Zhao, Jing Guo, Shasha Wang, Rui Wang, Mengqi Zhang, Wensheng Qiu
Frontiers in Immunology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Proteomic signatures of infiltrative gastric cancer by proteomic and bioinformatic analysis
Li-Hua Zhang, Hui-Qin Zhuo, Jing-Jing Hou, Yang Zhou, Jia Cheng, Jian-Chun Cai
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2022; 14(11): 2097. CrossRef
The distinct clinical trajectory, metastatic sites, and immunobiology of microsatellite-instability-high cancers
Shuting Han, Aik Yong Chok, Daniel Yang Yao Peh, Joshua Zhi-Ming Ho, Emile Kwong Wei Tan, Si-Lin Koo, Iain Bee-Huat Tan, Johnny Chin-Ann Ong
Frontiers in Genetics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Mismatch Repair Status Characterization in Oncologic Pathology: Taking Stock of the Real-World Possibilities
Roberto Piciotti, Konstantinos Venetis, Elham Sajjadi, Nicola Fusco
Journal of Molecular Pathology.2021; 2(2): 93. CrossRef
The Impact of Mismatch Repair Status on Prognosis of Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis
Wen-Long Guan, Yue Ma, Yue-Hong Cui, Tian-Shu Liu, Yan-Qiao Zhang, Zhi-Wei Zhou, Jian-Ying Xu, Li-Qiong Yang, Jia-Yu Li, Yu-Ting Sun, Rui-Hua Xu, Feng-Hua Wang, Miao-Zhen Qiu
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Establishment of a 5-gene risk model related to regulatory T cells for predicting gastric cancer prognosis
Gang Hu, Ningjie Sun, Jiansong Jiang, Xiansheng Chen
Cancer Cell International.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Mismatch Repair System Genomic Scars in Gastroesophageal Cancers: Biology and Clinical Testing
Gianluca Lopez, Konstantinos Venetis, Elham Sajjadi, Nicola Fusco
Gastrointestinal Disorders.2020; 2(4): 341. CrossRef

9,765 View
201 Download
14 Web of Science
7 Crossref

Comparison of the 7th and the 8th AJCC Staging System for Non-metastatic D2-Resected Lymph Node–Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Different Adjuvant Protocols: Jeong Il Yu, Do Hoon Lim, Jeeyun Lee, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Seung Tae Kim, Su Jin Lee, Sung Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Heejin Yoo, Kyunga Kim; Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):876-885. Published online October 1, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.401

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material PubReader ePub

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare prognostic differentiation performances of the 7th and the 8th edition of American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 1,633 GC patients who underwent curative D2 resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone (CA) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) from 2004 to 2013 were included. Concordance index (c-index) was applied to compare the discriminatory ability.
Results
In the 8th edition, migration of stage was detected in 248 patients (15.2%). Among them, 121 patients were up-staged while 127 patients were down-staged. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the discriminatory ability between the 7th and 8th editions. The new edition of staging system, however, showed a trend of better prognostic performance not only in recurrence-free survival (c-index=0.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.762 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.740; 95% CI, 0.712 to 0.768 in the 8th edition; p=0.14), but also in overall survival (c-index=0.717; 95% CI, 0.688 to 0.745 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.722; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.751 in the 8th edition; p=0.19), especially in stage III. This finding was repeated in the subgroup analysis regardless of adjuvant CA or CCRT.
Conclusion
Generally, the 8th edition of AJCC staging system had failed to show a superior discriminatory ability for curatively D2 resected GC patients than the 7th edition, although there was a trend of better prognostic performance of the new edition, regardless of adjuvant treatment method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

An analysis of the relationship of triglyceride glucose index with gastric cancer prognosis: A retrospective study
Chao Cai, Cheng Chen, Xiuli Lin, Huihui Zhang, Mingming Shi, Xiaolei Chen, Weisheng Chen, Didi Chen
Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pathologic N classification system
Kailai Yin, Xuanhong Jin, Yang Pan, Mengli Zi, Yingsong Zheng, Yubo Ma, Chuhong Pang, Kang liu, Jinxia Chen, Yizhou Wei, Dujiang Liu, Xiangdong Cheng, Li Yuan
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(8): 1283. CrossRef
A Comprehensive Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Styliani Mantziari, Penelope St Amour, Francesco Abboretti, Hugo Teixeira-Farinha, Sergio Gaspar Figueiredo, Caroline Gronnier, Dimitrios Schizas, Nicolas Demartines, Markus Schäfer
Cancers.2023; 15(5): 1628. CrossRef
Normalization weighted combination scores re-evaluate TNM staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database
Junpeng Wu, Hao Wang, Xin Yin, Yufei Wang, Zhanfei Lu, Jiaqi Zhang, Yao Zhang, Yingwei Xue
International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A Substage Increase in The AJCC Classification System Improves Prognostic Prediction in Stage III Gastric Cancer With Insufficient Lymph Nodes Removed
Ri-Sheng Zhao, Yi-Nan Liu, Wei-Gang Dai, Si-Le Chen, Jin-Ning Ye, Er-Tao Zhai, Shi-Rong Cai, Jian-Hui Chen
Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Current therapeutic options for gastric adenocarcinoma
C.R. Akshatha, Smitha Bhat, R. Sindhu, Dharini Shashank, Sarana Rose Sommano, Wanaporn Tapingkae, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Shashanka K. Prasad
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021; 28(9): 5371. CrossRef
Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Mesenchymal and Non-Mesenchymal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer
Jeong Il Yu, Hee Chul Park, Jeeyun Lee, Changhoon Choi, Won Ki Kang, Se Hoon Park, Seung Tae Kim, Tae Sung Sohn, Jun Ho Lee, Ji Yeong An, Min Gew Choi, Jae Moon Bae, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Heewon Han, Kyunga Kim, Sung Kim, Do Hoon Lim
Cancers.2020; 12(4): 943. CrossRef

11,207 View
216 Download
8 Web of Science
7 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search