Sun Min Lim, Cheol Joo Yoo, Jung Woo Han, Yong Jin Cho, Soo Hee Kim, Joong Bae Ahn, Sun Young Rha, Sang Joon Shin, Hyun Cheol Chung, Woo Ick Yang, Kyoo-Ho Shin, Jae Kyung Rho, Hyo Song Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2015;47(1):9-17. Published online August 21, 2014
Purpose Pediatric-type sarcomas such as rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), Ewing sarcoma (EWS), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), and desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT) are rare in adults, with limited studies on their prognosis and optimal treatment strategies. We aimed to examine the outcome of children and adult patients with RMS, EWS, PNET, and DSRCT and relevant prognostic factors. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 220 pediatric-type sarcoma patients at a single institution between 1985 and 2011. Comparisons were made in order to examine differences in demographics, disease characteristics, and survival. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. Results A total of 220 consecutive patients were identified at our institute. Median age was 15.6 years (range, 0 to 81 years) and there were 108 children (49%) and 112 adult patients (51%). According to histological classification, 106 patients (48.2%) had RMS, 60 (27.3%) had EWS, 50 (22.7%) had PNET, and 4 (1.8%) had DSRCT. With a median follow-up period of 6.6 years, the estimated median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 75 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.2 to 122.8 months) and median event-free survival (EFS) for all patients was 11 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 13.2 months). No significant difference in OS and EFS was observed between adults and children. In multivariate analysis, distant metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.617; 95% CI, 1.022 to 2.557; p=0.040) and no debulking surgery (HR, 1.443; 95% CI, 1.104 to 1.812; p=0.012) showed independent association with worse OS. Conclusion Metastatic disease and no surgical treatment are poor prognostic factors for OS among pediatric-type sarcomas for both adults and children.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
CAR-T Therapies in Solid Tumors: Opportunities and Challenges Grace Guzman, Megan R. Reed, Kevin Bielamowicz, Brian Koss, Analiz Rodriguez Current Oncology Reports.2023; 25(5): 479. CrossRef
Clinicopathological and treatment response characteristics of updated rhabdomyosarcoma histomolecular subtypes: An Asian population‐based study Guo Yuan How, Chik Hong Kuick, Min Hwee Yong, Shui Yen Soh, Esther XY Hee, Meng Kang Wong, Richard Quek, Mohd Farid Harunal, Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan, Kesavan Sittampalam, Chetan Anil Dhamne, Victor Lee, Kenneth TE Chang, Amos HP Loh Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pediatric sarcoma survivorship: A call for a developmental cascades approach Peter M. Fantozzi, Gina Sprint, Anna Marie Medina Development and Psychopathology.2022; 34(4): 1221. CrossRef
Clinical Perspectives for 18F-FDG PET Imaging in Pediatric Oncology: Μetabolic Tumor Volume and Radiomics Vassiliki Lyra, Sofia Chatziioannou, Maria Kallergi Metabolites.2022; 12(3): 217. CrossRef
Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors With EWS-WT1 Transcript Expression: Should We Consider Children and Adult Patients Differently? Laura Olivier-Gougenheim, Daniel Orbach, Vincent Atallah, Perrine Marec-Berard, Amandine Bertrand Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.2022; 44(3): e637. CrossRef
Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies Potential Actionable Targets in Paediatric Sarcomas Antonio Juan Ribelles, Pablo Gargallo, Pablo Berlanga, Vanessa Segura, Yania Yáñez, Bárbara Juan, Marta Salom, Margarita Llavador, Jaime Font de Mora, Victoria Castel, Adela Cañete Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(4): 268. CrossRef
Ewing Sarcoma Hee Young Ju Clinical Pediatric Hematology-Oncology.2019; 26(1): 27. CrossRef
Emerging trends in immunotherapy for pediatric sarcomas Kyle A. Dyson, Brian D. Stover, Adam Grippin, Hector R. Mendez-Gomez, Joanne Lagmay, Duane A. Mitchell, Elias J. Sayour Journal of Hematology & Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Yoon Soo Chang, Jeong Hun Seo, Ruth Lee, Joong Bae Ahn, Kwang Yong Shim, Soo Jung Gong, Hwa Young Lee, Sun Young Rha, Nae Choon Yoo, Chang Ok Suh, Joo Hang Kim, Jae Kyung Rho, Kyong Sik Lee, Jin Sik Min, Byung Soo Kim, Hyun Cheol Chung
PURPOSE Brain metastasis is estimated to occur in 20 to 40% of cancer patients, and meningeal involvement has been reported in 5% to 8% of cancer patients. Even if the prognosis is grave, standard treatment modality of brain metastasis or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis has not been established. We evaluated the prognosis and the clinical features of the brain and leptomeningeal metastasis of the breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The 43 patients who was diagnosed as brain parenchymal metastasis or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis clinically, radiologically and/or cytologically were included in this study. The median age was 44(range: 27-61) years. RESULTS The median duration from brain metastasis to death was 181 days(range: 8~1599), and the median duration from leptomeningeal carcinomatosis to death was 39 days(range: 25~152). Age(p=0.7174) and number of brain metastatic lesion(p=0.4097) did not influence the survival, but the presence of other systemic metastatic lesion affected the survival(p 0.0224). When we compared the survival rates of patients according to treatment modality, the patients with systemic chemotherapy versus patients without systemic chemotherapy showed differences(p= 0.0009). Patients treated with whole brain radiation only versus patients with whole brain radiation and other systemic management also showed different survival rate(p=0.0009). But intrathecal chemotherapy had no effect on survival. Well differentiated, solitary lesions were treated by operation and/or gamma-knife surgery, and their effects were good. CONCLUSION Prolongation of survival was suggested with whole brain radiotherapy combined with systemic treatment in brain or leptomeningeal metastasis. Further study is expected to confirm this finding.
PURPOSE The Mesima-Ex is a kind of biologic response modifier, which is extracted from a mushroom called Phellinus linteus. Mesima-Ex consists of various chemical compounds which include protein bound polysaccharide, mucoprotein, triterpenoid, and quinones. Mesima-Ex exerts its antitumor effects by augmenting host immune response without any toxic side effects. In vitro study, Mesima-Ex seems to potentiates antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and cell mediated cytotoxicity (CMI) against tumor cells. We initiated this study to verify antitumor effects of Mesima-Ex as an antineoplastic agent. MATERIALS AND METHOD Gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection with normal hepatic and renal function were eligible. They were divided into two groups by random number table. One group (N=30: Mesima-Ex group) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU (500 mg/m2 weekly), adriamycin (40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and Mesima-Ex (6 cap daily per Os). Another group (N=37: control group) received 5-FU and adriamycin only without Mesima-Ex. NK (natural killer cell) activity, ADCC (antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity), CD4 , and CD8 cells were measured and an analysis of disease free survival rate of the two study groups was performed. RESULTS Sixty seven patients were enrolled in this study.
Their median age was 55 years old. NK activity (basal activity: 25%) was enhanced significantly at the 2nd, and 4th months in the Mesima-Ex group (28.9%, 43.4%, p<0.05).
ADCC was also enhanced from 37% to 42.1% at the 2nd month in the Mesima-Ex group (p<0.05). The control group did not show any significant change in NK activity or ADCC. The CD4 cell ratio was increased from 37% to 42.1% at the 2nd months in the Mesima-Ex group but not in the control group (p<0.05).
There was no significant change in CD8 subsets (p>0.05).
There were no toxic side effects more than grade III from Mesima-Ex administration. The two year disease free survival rate was higher in the Mesima-Ex group than that of the control group (77% vs 58%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION Mesima-Ex can be used safely as an immunomodulator with standard chemotherapeutic agents for purpose of adjuvant chemotherapy. Mesima-Ex was effective in augmenting host immune response in vitro. The Mesima-Ex group showed a higher two year disease free survival rate than that of the control group.
Jin Hyuk Choi, Hyun Cheol Chung, Dong Jip Kim, Je Yol Oh, Joon Chang, Eun Hee Koh, Joo Hang Kim, Jae Kyung Rho, Sung Kyu Kim, Won Young Lee, Gwi Eon Kim, John Kyu Loh Juhn