Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of main tumor resection on long-term survival compared with pleural biopsy alone in patients with lung adenocarcinoma who were intraoperatively diagnosed with pleural metastasis.
Materials and Methods A total of 176 patients with adenocarcinoma who had unexpected pleural metastasis detected during surgery from 2002 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Each surgeon decided whether to perform main tumor resection or pleural biopsy alone.
Results The patients were grouped based on the surgical approaches: main tumor resection (resection group; n=83) and pleural biopsy only (O&C group; n=93). The resection group had better overall survival (OS; 10-year survival, 27.9% vs. 9.4%; median survival, 68.3 vs. 36.6 months; p < 0.01) and locoregional progression-free survival (10-year survival, 12.5% vs. 7.1%; median survival, 19.6 vs. 10.6 months; p < 0.01) than the O&C group. Similar results were found for OS in patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy (10-year survival, 49.2% vs. 15.0%; median survival, 72.2 vs. 45.4 months; p=0.03), patients who did not undergo TKIs treatment (10-year survival, 29.4% vs. 9.2%; median survival, 82.4 vs. 23.8 months; p < 0.01), and patients with positive target gene mutation (10-year survival, 31.7% vs. 10.1%; median survival, 72.2 vs. 33.7 months; p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, pleural biopsy only (hazard ratio, 1.73; p=0.04) was a significant predictor of OS.
Conclusion Main tumor resection can improve survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma who had unexpected pleural metastasis during operation.
Purpose
This study investigated the recurrence patterns and timing in patients with pathologic N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to the residual tumor (R) descriptor proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC).
Materials and Methods
From 2004 to 2021, patients with pN2 NSCLC who underwent anatomical resection were analyzed according to the IASLC R criteria using medical records from a single center. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Recurrence patterns between complete (R0) and uncertain resections (R[un]) were compared.
Results
In total, 1,373 patients were enrolled in this study: 576 (42.0%) in R0, 286 (20.8%) in R(un), and 511 (37.2%) in R1/R2 according to the IASLC R criteria. The most common reason for R(un) classification was positivity for the highest lymph node (88.8%). In multivariable analysis, the hazard ratios for recurrence in R(un) and R1/R2 compared to R0 were 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96–1.46) and 1.58 (1.31–1.90), respectively. The hazard rate curves displayed similar patterns among groups, peaking at approximately 12 months after surgery. There was a significant difference in distant recurrence patterns between R0 and R(un). Further analysis after stratification with the IASLC N2 descriptor showed significant differences in distant recurrence patterns between R0 and R(un) in patients pN2a1 and pN2a2 disease, but not in those with pN2b disease.
Conclusion
The IASLC R criteria has prognostic relevance in patients with pN2 NSCLC. R(un) is a highly heterogeneous group, and the involvement of the highest mediastinal lymph node can affect distant recurrence patterns.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Evaluation of Uncertain Resection for Localized Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Crucial Prognosis of Suboptimal Lymph Node Assessment Romain Vergé, Axel Rouch, Pierre Rabinel, Claire Renaud, Mathilde Cazaux, Laurent Brouchet The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.2025; 120(4): 637. CrossRef
Purpose The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer suggests further subdivision of pathologic N (pN) category in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by incorporating the location and number of involved lymph node (LN) stations. We reclassified patients with the station-based N2b disease into single-zone and multi-zone N2b groups and compared survival outcomes between the groups.
Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with pN2 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy from 2006 to 2019. The N2 disease was subdivided into four categories: single-station N2 without N1 (N2a1), single-station N2 with N1 (N2a2), multiple-station N2 with single zone involvement (single-zone N2b), and multiple-station N2 with multiple zone involvement (multi-zone N2b). LN zones included in the subdivision of N2 disease were upper mediastinal, lower mediastinal, aortopulmonary, and subcarinal.
Results Among 996 eligible patients, 211 (21.2%), 394 (39.6%), and 391 (39.3%) were confirmed to have pN2a1, pN2a2, and pN2b disease, respectively. In multivariable analysis after adjustment for sex, age, pT category, and adjuvant chemotherapy, overall survival was significantly better with single-zone N2b disease (n=125, 12.6%) than with multi-zone N2b disease (n=266, 26.7%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.90; p=0.009) and was comparable to that of N2a2 disease (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.49; p=0.46).
Conclusion Prognosis of single-zone LN metastasis was better than that of multiple-zone LN metastasis in patients with N2b NSCLC. Along with the station-based N descriptors, zone-based descriptors might ensure optimal staging, enabling the most appropriate decision-making on adjuvant therapy for patients with pN2 NSCLC.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Using Primary Tumor Somatic Mutation Data Victor Lee, Nicholas S. Moore, Joshua Doyle, Daniel Hicks, Patrick Oh, Shari Bodofsky, Sajid Hossain, Abhijit A. Patel, Sanjay Aneja, Robert Homer, Henry S. Park JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef